The superintendent candidates for Seattle Public Schools: The good, the bad and the ugly
I will focus on two of the candidates, Enoch and Husk. They are, in a sense, polar opposites. Banda seems “nice enough” but we need more than that in Seattle, particularly now after having to live through Broad and Goodloe-Johnson forcing their will on Seattle Public Schools with the stealth help of Gates funded organizations.
Because I want to end this post on a positive note, I’ll start with who we don’t want as superintendent. That would be Dr. Sandra Husk.
Dr. Husk didn’t get off on the right foot when the district that had just hired her discovered that she had lied during the interview process. According to The Statesman Journal:
Because I want to end this post on a positive note, I’ll start with who we don’t want as superintendent. That would be Dr. Sandra Husk.
Dr. Husk didn’t get off on the right foot when the district that had just hired her discovered that she had lied during the interview process. According to The Statesman Journal:
But what should be community joy is tempered by the realization that the next school superintendent already has misled the public. She said she wasn’t a candidate for school
