Latest News and Comment from Education

Thursday, January 9, 2025

WOULD THE NEW YORK TIMES AND WASHINGTON POST PUBLISH THE PENTAGON PAPERS AND EXPOSE WATERGATE IN TODAY'S MEDIA CLIMATE?

 

WOULD THE NEW YORK TIMES AND WASHINGTON POST PUBLISH THE PENTAGON PAPERS AND EXPOSE WATERGATE IN TODAY'S MEDIA CLIMATE?

Imagine this: It’s 2025. The New York Times and the Washington Post are handed two of the most explosive stories in American history. The Pentagon Papers—7,000 pages of classified government deception about the Vietnam War—and a trail of corruption leading straight to the Oval Office, a modern-day Watergate. The stakes? Unimaginably high. The risks? Career-ending lawsuits, social media mobs, and, of course, the wrath of Donald J. Trump.  

But wait—this isn’t the 1970s anymore. The media landscape has changed. The Times and the Post aren’t just journalistic institutions; they’re also businesses. And in an era where billionaires own newspapers and public trust in journalism is at an all-time low, would these legendary outlets still have the guts to publish?  

Let’s take a closer look at how the modern-day Times and Post might handle their greatest tests in the age of Jack Smith, Kamala Harris endorsements, and Bezos pulling cartoons.  

The New York Times: Balancing Journalism and Billionaire Interests  

The New York Times is no stranger to controversy, but today’s Times operates under a unique set of pressures. Take, for instance, the recent incident where publisher A.G. Sulzberger reportedly pulled an editorial endorsing Kamala Harris as the Democratic Party’s best bet for 2024. The piece was allegedly spiked after concerns arose that it might alienate centrist readers or reflect poorly on the paper’s supposed neutrality.  

Now, imagine the Pentagon Papers landing on Sulzberger’s desk in this climate. Would he greenlight the publication of 7,000 pages of classified government documents? Or would he worry about alienating subscribers, angering advertisers, or triggering a Twitter firestorm?  

In 1971, the Times’ decision to publish the Pentagon Papers was made by a newsroom that still held editorial independence as sacred. But today, the lines between editorial and business interests are blurrier. The Times has faced criticism for catering to its predominantly liberal audience, sometimes at the expense of journalistic risk-taking. Would the fear of losing subscribers—or worse, being labeled “too partisan”—deter the paper from publishing?  

And let’s not forget the legal risks. In 1971, the Times went all the way to the Supreme Court to defend its right to publish. But in 2025, with Trump’s legal team filing injunctions faster than you can say “fake news,” would the Times have the same resolve? Or would Sulzberger, wary of another PR disaster like the Kamala Harris endorsement debacle, decide it’s just not worth the fight?  

The Washington Post: Democracy Dies in Darkness—But Cartoons Die in Bezos’ Inbox  

Over at the Washington Post, the situation isn’t any simpler. The paper famously broke the Watergate scandal in the 1970s, thanks to the dogged reporting of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. But today’s Post operates under the ownership of Jeff Bezos, a billionaire who’s shown he’s not above meddling when it suits him.  

Take the recent controversy where Bezos reportedly pulled a political cartoon and an opinion piece critical of Amazon’s labor practices. The move sparked outrage among staffers, who saw it as a blatant violation of editorial independence. If Bezos is willing to kill a cartoon to protect his company’s image, what’s to stop him from interfering with a story that could alienate half of Amazon’s customer base?  

Now imagine the Post uncovering a modern-day Watergate. Would Bezos allow the paper to publish a story that could destabilize the country—or worse, hurt Amazon’s bottom line? Or would he quietly suggest that the editors “take a different angle”?  

And then there’s the issue of public trust. In the 1970s, the Post’s reporting helped bring down a president. Today, half the country would dismiss its reporting as partisan hackery, no matter how airtight the evidence. The Post could publish a video of Trump personally orchestrating a break-in, and his supporters would still cry “deep state conspiracy.” Would Bezos, ever the pragmatist, decide that the juice just isn’t worth the squeeze?  

The Jack Smith Factor: A Modern-Day Pentagon Papers Meets Watergate  

Enter Jack Smith, the special counsel whose alleged report claims Trump “engaged in an unprecedented criminal effort” as the head of multiple conspiracies. If the Times and the Post were handed this report today, would they publish it?  

On one hand, both papers have shown they’re willing to take on Trump. The Times exposed his tax returns, and the Post broke the Access Hollywood tape. But those stories, while significant, didn’t carry the same existential risks as the Pentagon Papers or Watergate. Publishing Smith’s report would mean taking on not just Trump, but his entire media ecosystem—a machine designed to discredit, distract, and destroy.  

And let’s not forget the government’s role. In the Nixon era, the Supreme Court ultimately sided with the press. But today’s judiciary is far more conservative, and Trump’s allies would undoubtedly argue that publishing Smith’s report constitutes a national security threat. Would the Times and the Post be willing to risk it all for the sake of the truth?  

The Verdict: Would They Publish?  

So, would the New York Times and the Washington Post publish the Pentagon Papers and expose Watergate if those stories happened today? The answer is… complicated.  

On paper, both institutions remain committed to their mission of holding power accountable. But in practice, they operate in a world where journalism is as much about survival as it is about truth. The Times might hesitate, fearing backlash from subscribers or another Kamala Harris-style endorsement controversy. The Post might falter, wary of angering Bezos or alienating Amazon customers.  

And then there’s the public. In the 1970s, Americans trusted the press to tell them the truth. Today, half the country would dismiss the Pentagon Papers as a “deep state hoax” and Watergate as “fake news.” Even the most explosive story might struggle to break through the noise.  

But here’s the thing: journalism has always been a leap of faith. In 1971, the Times published the Pentagon Papers knowing full well it might lose in court. In 1972, the Post pursued Watergate despite the risks. And if history is any guide, both papers would rise to the occasion again.  

After all, democracy dies in darkness—but it also survives on the courage of those willing to shine a light. Let’s just hope the billionaires don’t dim the bulbs.

Supreme Court allows Trump's sentencing in New York hush money case The decision means a sentencing hearing scheduled for Friday can go ahead as planned. The president-elect had asked the high court to intervene. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-declines-block-trump-sentencing-hush-money-case-rcna186837 

THE OLIGARCHY'S GREAT AMERICAN EDUCATION HEIST: BILLIONAIRES GONE WILD


THE OLIGARCHY'S GREAT AMERICAN EDUCATION HEIST

BILLIONAIRES GONE WILD

Once upon a time, in a land where public education was once the pride of the nation, a cabal of billionaires decided they knew better. Why let trained educators, seasoned policymakers, or—heaven forbid—actual parents have a say in the future of America's children? Enter the oligarchy, a not-so-merry band of billionaires with deep pockets and even deeper disdain for public institutions. Led by Microsoft mogul Bill Gates and backed by a star-studded lineup featuring Eli Broad, Mike Bloomberg, Reed Hastings, the Walton family, the Koch brothers, and Betsy DeVos, etc. they embarked on a mission to "fix" public education. Spoiler alert: their definition of "fix" was more akin to "wreck beyond recognition."  

Step One: Smear Campaigns & Slogans  

First, the oligarchs needed a villain. Enter teachers—those pesky, hardworking professionals who dared to demand fair pay and adequate resources. With the help of mainstream media cheerleaders and a battalion of foundations, nonprofits, and astroturfed "parent groups," the billionaires launched a smear campaign. Teachers became "bad," schools were dubbed "failing," and the narrative was set.  

Armed with catchy slogans like "No Child Left Behind" (ironic, since so many were) and "Race to the Top" (spoiler: not everyone gets to run), they made their pitch sound like a noble crusade. Who could argue with leaving no child behind or racing to excellence? It was marketing genius—if you ignored the fine print.  

Step Two: Standardized Testing & Common Core Chaos  

Next came the billion-dollar tools of destruction: standardized tests and the infamous Common Core State Standards. Bankrolled by—you guessed it—the oligarchs themselves, these initiatives promised to revolutionize education. What they delivered was a soul-crushing regime of bubble sheets and rote memorization.  

Students were reduced to data points, teachers were shackled to test prep, and schools that didn’t measure up were labeled failures. Forget creativity, critical thinking, or joy in learning—there was no time for that nonsense when test scores were at stake!  

Step Three: Charter Schools & Vouchers—The Trojan Horse  

But wait, there’s more! The oligarchs weren’t content with just breaking public schools; they wanted to replace them. Enter charter schools and private school vouchers—the shiny new toys of education reform. Marketed as "choice" and "innovation," these tools were less about helping kids and more about funneling public dollars into private hands.  

Charter schools sprang up like mushrooms after a rainstorm, often with little oversight or accountability. Some succeeded, sure—but many failed spectacularly, leaving students stranded and taxpayers footing the bill. Meanwhile, vouchers siphoned money away from public schools, leaving them even more underfunded than before.  

The result? A two-tiered education system where wealthy kids thrived in well-funded private schools while poor and disabled children languished in crumbling public institutions. Mission accomplished—if your mission was to cement class hierarchies and entrench inequality.  

Step Four: Stirring the Culture War Pot  

But why stop at dismantling public education when you can also divide the nation? The oligarchs deftly weaponized cultural issues to further their agenda. Religious concepts were injected into debates over curriculum, and hot-button topics became distractions from the real issue: the systematic destruction of public schools.  

Real parent groups and teacher organizations tried to fight back, but they were dismissed as ignorant or self-serving. Teacher unions were painted as villains, despite being some of the last defenders of equitable education. It was a masterclass in misdirection—divide and conquer at its finest.  

The Resistance Fights Back  

Not everyone was fooled by the oligarchy’s slick marketing and deep pockets. Education experts like Diane Ravitch sounded the alarm with books like *The Death and Life of the Great American School System* and *Reign of Error*. Activists, parents, and teachers rallied to defend public education, exposing the privatization movement for what it was: a cash grab disguised as reform.  

But fighting billionaires isn’t easy—especially when they’re spending billions to silence you. The oligarchs had think tanks, lobbyists, and PR firms on their side. The resistance had bake sales and Facebook groups. Guess which side had more influence in Washington?  

The Aftermath: A System in Shambles  

Today, the scars of the oligarchy’s education heist are painfully visible. Public schools are underfunded and overburdened. Teachers are burnt out and fleeing the profession in droves. Students are stressed, over-tested, and underserved. And yet, the billionaires press on, undeterred by their trail of destruction.  

Their endgame? An "ownership society" where they control not just education but every facet of American life. Public schools? Privatized. Healthcare? For-profit. Democracy? Optional. It’s not about left or right politics—it’s about power and profit, plain and simple.  

Conclusion: Lessons Learned (or Not)  

So what can we learn from this cautionary tale? For starters, beware of billionaires bearing gifts—especially when those gifts come wrapped in slogans like "choice" and "innovation." Public education isn’t perfect, but it’s worth fighting for. It’s one of the last great equalizers in a society increasingly defined by inequality.  

The oligarchs may have billions, but we have something they’ll never understand: people power. Parents, teachers, students, and communities united can stand up to even the wealthiest adversaries. After all, if there’s one thing history has taught us, it’s that Goliath doesn’t always win—especially when David has a really good slingshot.  

And who knows? Maybe one day we’ll look back on this era not as the death knell of public education but as the moment we woke up and fought back. Until then, sharpen your pencils—and your wit—because this battle is far from over.  


MEMES THAT MADE ME LAUGH TODAY 1-9

MEMES THAT MADE ME LAUGH TODAY 1-9


















































Big Education Ape: THE OLIGARCHY'S GREAT AMERICAN EDUCATION HEIST: BILLIONAIRES GONE WILD https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/01/the-oligarchys-great-american-education.html 









Big Education Ape: WTF CLIMATE CHANGE: DRILL BABY DRILL, SNOW BABY SNOW, AND THE BILLIONAIRE ESCAPE PLAN https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/01/wtf-climate-change-drill-baby-drill.html 

Big Education Ape: FOUNDING FATHERS AND MODERN JUSTICE: A TALE OF POWER, PRIVILEGE, AND A FEW QUESTIONABLES CHOICES https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/01/founding-fathers-and-modern-justice.html 


Big Education Ape: CALIFORNIA: THE LIBERTARIAN WOLF IN LIBERAL CLOTHING https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/01/california-libertarian-wolf-in-liberal.html 







Big Education Ape: HAPPY NEW YEAR FROM THE BIG EDUCATION BLOG!!!! PLUS OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES AND THAT TIME I ATE THE DRY-ERASE MARKER https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2024/12/happy-new-year-from-big-education-blog.html 






Big Education Ape: HAPPY NEW YEAR FROM THE BIG EDUCATION BLOG!!!! PLUS OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES AND THAT TIME I ATE THE DRY-ERASE MARKER https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2024/12/happy-new-year-from-big-education-blog.html 






Big Education Ape: THE OWNERSHIP SOCIETY: AMERICA'S RECIPE FOR DISASTER https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2024/12/the-ownership-society-americas-recipe.html