RELIGIOUS CHARTER SCHOOLS - A HOLY MESS FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE (SUPREME COURT AUDIO)

RELIGIOUS CHARTER SCHOOLS

A HOLY MESS FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

The separation of church and state—America's favorite constitutional conundrum. For over two centuries, this principle has been the delicate balancing act between keeping religion out of government and government out of religion. But now, in a plot twist worthy of a Netflix drama, the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to weigh in on whether religious charter schools can be classified as public charter schools. Spoiler alert: this could be the plotline that kills the separation of church and state—or at least sends it into a coma.

At the heart of the controversy is St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School in Oklahoma, a school that wants to have its communion wafer and eat it too. By seeking public charter school status—and the sweet, sweet taxpayer dollars that come with it—St. Isidore has sparked a fiery debate about whether religious institutions should get a slice of the public funding pie. The stakes are high, the arguments are heated, and the implications are enormous.

A Brief History Lesson: How We Got Here

The phrase "separation of church and state" isn't explicitly in the Constitution, but its spirit is enshrined in the First Amendment. The Establishment Clause ensures that Congress can't make laws respecting an establishment of religion, while the Free Exercise Clause protects individuals' rights to practice their faith freely. It's a delicate dance that has kept public institutions largely secular while allowing religious freedom to flourish.

Fast forward to today, and this balance is being tested like never before. Religious charter schools are knocking on the door of public funding, and critics argue that letting them in could shatter the wall between church and state like a wrecking ball through drywall.

The Case That Could Change Everything

The Supreme Court's decision on St. Isidore of Seville could redefine what it means to be a charter school. Charter schools occupy a peculiar space in American education—they're publicly funded but privately operated. Think of them as the cool cousin of traditional public schools, wearing ripped jeans and playing acoustic guitar at family gatherings. But here's the catch: they’re supposed to be non-sectarian. That’s right, no religious affiliations allowed.

Oklahoma law explicitly states that charter schools must remain non-religious, but the Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board approved St. Isidore's application anyway, allowing it to operate as a Catholic school with public funding. The Oklahoma Supreme Court promptly struck down this decision, ruling that charter schools are public entities and must remain secular. Enter stage right: the U.S. Supreme Court, ready to deliver its verdict.

The Arguments: A Battle of Biblical Proportions

Proponents of St. Isidore argue that excluding religious schools from public funding programs is discriminatory and violates recent Supreme Court precedents. They point to cases like *Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer* and *Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue*, where the Court ruled that religious organizations couldn't be excluded from public benefits solely because they were religious.

But critics—including the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools—are sounding the alarm. They argue that allowing religious charter schools to access public funds would blur the line between church and state beyond recognition. Carol Burris, director of the Network for Public Education, warns that this could spell doom for the national charter school movement itself. If religious charter schools are allowed, states might impose stricter oversight on all charters or even reconsider their public/private status entirely. And let’s be honest—charter schools don’t exactly have a stellar reputation for transparency and accountability as it is.

The Supreme Court’s Wild Card

Justice Amy Coney Barrett has recused herself from this case, likely due to her ties to a Notre Dame professor connected to the Catholic Church. Her absence leaves Chief Justice John Roberts as the potential swing vote in what could be a 4-4 deadlock. If that happens, the Oklahoma Supreme Court's ruling against religious charter schools would stand—but don’t pop the champagne just yet.

The Court’s conservative majority has been steadily chipping away at the separation of church and state in recent years. Justice Brett Kavanaugh has even suggested that strict separation might itself be unconstitutional if it limits individuals’ ability to opt into religious activities using public funds. Translation: taxpayers could soon find themselves footing the bill for institutions that teach creationism alongside calculus.

The Broader Implications: A Pandora’s Box

If the Supreme Court rules in favor of St. Isidore, it could open the floodgates for religious charter schools nationwide. States would likely be required to fund not just Catholic schools but also institutions affiliated with every imaginable faith—Baptist, Buddhist, Pastafarian (yes, that's a thing). This could lead to logistical headaches over admissions policies, curriculum standards, and hiring practices. Imagine trying to reconcile a science teacher's union contract with a school’s belief in divine intervention—awkward.

Moreover, this ruling could set a precedent for other public services. Could hospitals demand public funding while refusing to perform procedures that conflict with their religious beliefs? Could fire departments decline to rescue someone who doesn’t share their faith? Okay, maybe I’m exaggerating—but you get the point.

The Conclusion (Because Why Not?)

Let’s face it: allowing religious charter schools into the public education system is like inviting your overly opinionated uncle to Thanksgiving dinner—it’s bound to get messy. The separation of church and state isn’t just some quaint relic of Enlightenment-era thinking; it’s a cornerstone of American democracy. It ensures that public institutions serve everyone equally, regardless of their faith (or lack thereof).

If St. Isidore gets its way, we could be looking at a future where “public” education is anything but secular, where taxpayer dollars fund schools that teach theology alongside trigonometry, and where the line between church and state is so blurred it might as well be written in invisible ink.

So buckle up, America. This Supreme Court decision could be one for the history books—or at least for your next heated dinner table debate. Let’s just hope we don’t end up rewriting the Constitution on a chalkboard at Sunday school.

This Supreme Court Decision Could Determine the Future of Charter Schools - Progressive.org https://progressive.org/public-schools-advocate/this-supreme-court-decision-could-determine-the-future-of-charter-schools-burris-20250513/ 

Supreme Court seems open to religious charter schools : NPR https://www.npr.org/2025/04/30/nx-s1-5382348/supreme-court-seems-poised-to-require-state-funded-charter-schools-to-include-religious-schools 

Supreme Court hears arguments in effort to create first U.S. religious charter school | full audio

The Supreme Court debates whether a religious charter school, St. Isidore, violates the Establishment Clause, focusing on religious neutrality, private choice, and state regulations in public education.

Detailed Summary for [Supreme Court hears arguments in effort to create first U.S. religious charter school | full audio](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP67WzpOzN8&t=15s) by [Monica](https://monica.im)

  [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP67WzpOzN8&t=15s&t=0.24) The Supreme Court hears arguments regarding the establishment of a religious charter school, focusing on issues of autonomy, religious inclusion, and constitutional rights.

  - The charter school model allows for innovation and autonomy in mission and curriculum.}

- State laws currently prevent religious groups from participating in charter programs, citing a narrow definition of diversity.}

- Legal precedents suggest that excluding religious groups from public programs violates the free exercise clause of the First Amendment.}

- St. Isidor, created by private Catholic organizations, operates independently and is not a government entity.}

- The community's support for St. Isidor indicates a demand for inclusion rather than exclusion based on religious affiliation.}      

[16:26](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP67WzpOzN8&t=15s&t=986.72) The Supreme Court hears arguments regarding the establishment clause and the potential creation of a religious charter school, focusing on the implications of government funding for religious education.

  - Discussion on the requirement for students to support the school's religious mission.}

- Clarification that St. Isidor aims to be a religious charter school, not just a standard charter school.}

- Debate over whether funding a single religious school violates the establishment clause.}

- Concerns raised about the potential violation of the establishment clause if the government favors one religion over others.}

- Argument that the program could allow other religious organizations as long as they comply with its terms.}      

[32:56](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP67WzpOzN8&t=15s&t=1976.24) The Supreme Court is examining the case of St. Isidor, which seeks to establish a religious charter school in Oklahoma, raising questions about the distinction between secular and religious educational benefits.

  - Discussion on Oklahoma's attempt to establish a religious charter school.}

- St. Isidor aims to create a religious school, not a secular one, distinguishing their request from public benefits.}

- The argument suggests that integrating a secular requirement into the definition of benefits leads to errors previously corrected by the court.}

- St. Isidor seeks a contract tailored to include religious education, which the state claims is not part of the benefits offered.}      

[49:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP67WzpOzN8&t=15s&t=2965.52) The Supreme Court is deliberating on the implications of including religious charter schools in a state-funded education program, addressing the balance between religious freedoms and state regulations.

  - Discussion of previous court cases that set precedents regarding the inclusion of religious entities in educational funding.}

- Emphasis on the importance of religious education for communities, highlighting the distinct educational needs of various religious groups.}

- The court's ruling in Carson reinforces that if a state opens funding to private organizations, it cannot exclude religious institutions.}

- The state's desire for curricular flexibility contrasts with the obligation to fund religious schools if they are included in the program.}

- Clarification that a state is not required to open its educational programs to private organizations, indicating limits to the funding obligations.}      

[01:05:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP67WzpOzN8&t=15s&t=3952.48) The Supreme Court deliberates on the distinction between religious charter schools and public schools, focusing on the implications of state funding and the establishment clause.

  - The discussion begins with the court examining the differences between religious schools and public schools, emphasizing the state's interest in avoiding entanglement with religious funding.}

- The argument references prior cases to support the notion of private choice in school participation, highlighting the role of parents and the schools in the decision-making process.}

- The court considers whether the state can impose educational requirements on religious schools, suggesting that such requirements could be neutral and generally applicable.}

- Challenges to free exercise claims are discussed, particularly regarding whether religious beliefs can exempt schools from teaching certain subjects if the requirements are deemed neutral.}      

[01:22:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP67WzpOzN8&t=15s&t=4941.92) The Supreme Court is examining the implications of a charter school application that aligns with Catholic teachings and how this affects the definition of public schools and compliance with federal and state laws.

  - Discussion on the approval of the school application and changes made regarding non-discrimination requirements.}

- The application emphasizes compliance with laws while prioritizing Catholic Church teachings and obligations.}

- A significant change in the definition of public schools is noted, highlighting the distinction between charter schools and state-supported institutions.}

- The case references previous rulings on religious discrimination, questioning the treatment of religious entities in educational contexts.}      

[01:38:51](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP67WzpOzN8&t=15s&t=5931.6) The Supreme Court is examining the implications of charter schools in relation to state educational requirements and the potential for religious or secular viewpoints to influence curricula.

  - Charter schools must meet state academic standards while allowing for diverse curricular focuses.}

- Discussion centers around whether a charter school can promote a specific secular viewpoint while adhering to educational requirements.}

- The conversation explores the boundaries of educational content, particularly regarding LGBTQ+ representation and state law limitations.}      

[01:55:20](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP67WzpOzN8&t=15s&t=6920.8) The Supreme Court hears arguments regarding the establishment of the first U.S. religious charter school, focusing on the differences between charter schools and public schools, their regulatory frameworks, and the implications for educational standards.

  - Discussion on the perception of charter schools and their intended purpose compared to public schools.}

- Clarification that charter schools aim to provide innovative teaching methods while adhering to state standards and rigorous evaluation processes.}

- Inquiry into the oversight of charter schools, specifically regarding curriculum inspection and adherence to academic standards.}

- Justice Gorsuch raises questions about the governance of charter schools and the potential for litigation regarding board member appointments.}

Supreme Court hears arguments in effort to create first U.S. religious c... https://www.youtube.com/live/cP67WzpOzN8?si=GcjghlMP5hng8LzC via @YouTube       

Transcript

Follow along using the transcript.

 

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
5-15-25

The Atlantic: Trump Declares War on the Rule of Law https://dianeravitch.net/2025/05/14/the-atlantic-trump-declares-war-on-the-rule-of-law/ via @dianeravitch 

Home About Follow Diane’s Posts NPE Blog Posts Of The Day Blog Topics DeSantis Diane Ravitch's blog A site to discuss education and democracy « Marc Elias’s Democracy Docket: Sign up Lithwick & Stern: A Time for Lawyers to Defend Their Profession and Democracy » The Atlantic: Trump Declares War on the Rule of Law By dianeravitch May 14, 2025 // 1 During Biden’s term in office, Republicans continually complained that Biden was “weaponizing” the Justice Department because it prosecuted Trump for inciting the insurrection of January 6, 2021, and for taking classified documents to his Mar-A-Lago estate. Days ago, the Trump administration announced that it had reached a settlement with the family of Ashli Babbitt, who was shot and killed by a police officer as she attempted to be first to break into the House of Representatives’ chamber, where members of Congress were fleeing. The family is suing for $30 million

### Key Points

- During Biden's presidency, Republicans accused him of weaponizing the Justice Department, but now Trump is accused of doing the same by prosecuting his political enemies and rewarding allies. 

- Trump's administration settled with Ashli Babbitt's family, who was shot during the Capitol insurrection, and is using the DOJ to target law firms representing Democrats. 

- Trump's executive orders against law firms have been challenged in court, with Perkins Coie winning an injunction against his bans. 

- Trump's actions are described as an assault on the rule of law, using DOJ to punish opponents and eliminate internal opposition. 

- Investigations by Trump's DOJ are politically motivated, targeting individuals like Chris Krebs and Miles Taylor for perceived disloyalty. 

- The DOJ under Trump is investigating states and entities opposing his policies, such as New Jersey and Maine, and targeting journalists. 

- Trump's DOJ is accused of targeting Democratic fundraising platforms, demonstrating misuse of power for political gain. 

Lithwick & Stern: A Time for Lawyers to Defend Their Profession and Democracy https://dianeravitch.net/2025/05/14/litvins-stern-a-time-for-lawyers-to-defend-their-profession-and-democracy/ via @dianeravitch 

The article discusses the response of the legal profession to former President Trump's attempts to undermine the rule of law in the United States. It highlights criticism by Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern of large law firms that complied with Trump's demands to abandon diversity programs and support his causes. The article emphasizes the role of judges, particularly Judge Beryl Howell, in defending the independence of lawyers and the fair administration of justice. Judge Howell's opinion is noted for its strong defense of lawyers' rights to represent clients without government retribution and urges lawyers to actively participate in upholding democracy and the rule of law.

### Key Points

- Lithwick and Stern criticize big law firms for yielding to Trump's demands against diversity programs. 

- Over 200 lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration, with judges facing threats. 

- Judge Beryl Howell defended the role of lawyers in democracy with a significant ruling. 

- Howell's decision praised Perkins Coie and criticized firms that complied with Trump. 

- Howell warned that lawyers must not compromise their ethics for political pressure. 

- The article calls on lawyers to actively defend the rule of law. 

- Howell argues against neutrality in the face of lawlessness, quoting Alexis de Tocqueville. 

Chief Justice Roberts Blames "Lack of Civics Education" for Breakdown in Respect for Law https://dianeravitch.net/2025/05/14/chief-justice-roberts-blames-lack-of-civics-education-for-breakdown-in-respect-for-law/ via @dianeravitch

Chief Justice John Roberts attributed the decline in respect for the law to a lack of civics education in a speech at Georgetown University Law School. However, the article criticizes him for not addressing other significant factors contributing to this issue, such as political leaders undermining the rule of law and the Supreme Court's own decisions that have eroded legal principles. The article points out that the emphasis on test scores, driven by policies like No Child Left Behind, has marginalized civics education in schools. The discussion includes various opinions on the systemic problems affecting civics education and the rule of law in the United States.

### Key Points

- Chief Justice Roberts blamed the lack of civics education for the decline in respect for the law but did not address political leaders' actions undermining the rule of law. 

- The article argues that policies like No Child Left Behind have contributed to the reduction of civics education by prioritizing test scores in reading and math. 

- The Roberts Court's decisions, such as granting presidential immunity, have also weakened respect for the law, contradicting civics teachings that no one is above the law. 

- The discussion highlights systemic issues, including political and economic priorities and the influence of privatization on education. 

RFK Jr. Takes the Family Swimming on Mother's Day---in a Toxic Creek https://dianeravitch.net/2025/05/14/rfk-jr-takes-the-family-swimming-on-mothers-day-in-a-toxic-creek/ via @dianeravitch 

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary, faced criticism for taking his family swimming in Rock Creek, a heavily polluted waterway in Washington, D.C., on Mother’s Day. Despite explicit warnings from the National Park Service about the creek's hazardous bacterial levels, Kennedy proceeded with the activity, raising concerns about his judgment. His controversial actions align with previous criticisms of his leadership, including skepticism about vaccines and questionable health claims. The incident has sparked debates about child welfare and public health leadership.

### Key Points

- RFK Jr. swam with his family in a polluted creek despite warnings about health hazards. 

- Swimming in D.C. rivers has been banned since 1971 due to high levels of fecal bacteria. 

- RFK Jr. has faced criticism for his judgment, including from family members and health professionals. 

- He previously made controversial health claims and has no medical training despite leading the Department of Health and Human Services. 

- Public reactions include accusations of child abuse and calls for investigations. 

Why Does the Word "Traditional" Have a Negative Rather Than a Positive Ring? https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2025/05/14/why-does-the-word-traditional-have-a-negative-rather-than-a-positive-ring/ via @CubanLarry 

### Key Points

- A student compared a "flipped" classroom model to the author's seminar, labeling the latter as "traditional," which surprised the author. 

- In a "flipped" classroom, students watch video lectures at home and engage in collaborative discussions during class time. 

- The author's seminar involved structured discussions, group activities, and guided exploration, which aligned with "traditional" teaching methods despite active student engagement. 

- The author reflects on the negative connotations of the word "traditional" among reform-minded educators, associating it with passive learning and teacher-controlled classrooms. 

- The author acknowledges that effective "traditional" teaching can result in engaged and active student participation, challenging reformist rhetoric. 

- The experience led the author to reevaluate their perception of "traditional" teaching, recognizing its diverse impacts on students and teachers. 

DeSantis vs Canady, pt 2: make the Lakeland city elections mean something to living in Lakeland, by @BillyTownsendEd https://open.substack.com/pub/billytownsend/p/desantis-vs-canady-pt-2-make-the?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 

The article discusses the importance of making Lakeland city elections meaningful by addressing real issues rather than focusing on individual personalities. The author, Billy Townsend, expresses dissatisfaction with past political outcomes and emphasizes the need for candidates to engage with critical issues affecting Lakeland's future, such as protecting public assets, addressing local institutional failures, and improving civic engagement. Townsend also outlines specific questions and topics he believes should be addressed by candidates to ensure accountability and better governance.

### Key Points

- The role of elected officials in Lakeland should be defined by the voters, focusing on the city's future rather than personal status. 

- Past political efforts failed to prevent undesirable candidates from gaining power, leading to negative consequences at state and national levels. 

- Institutional issues and systemic failures need to be confronted for meaningful electoral campaigns. 

- The author plans to pressure city candidates to address anti-corruption principles and other crucial issues for Lakeland's future. 

- Questions are posed to candidates about protecting Lakeland Electric and other public assets from privatization. 

- Discussions about the future of Lakeland Regional Health and healthcare in the city are necessary. 

- The author advocates for a new trial for Leo Schofield, citing systemic legal failures as a threat to citizens. 

- Lakeland voters supported restoring Roe v. Wade protections, indicating a disconnect with current legislative actions. 

- The author criticizes Florida Poly's impact on education and suggests seeking reimbursement and alternative management. 

- The lack of competitive teacher pay and educational resources in Polk County is highlighted as a significant issue. 

- The Southern Group's lobbying contract with the city should be scrutinized and potentially put out for competitive bidding. 

- The current legislative priorities of Lakeland are seen as inadequate and not reflective of community needs. 

- The author criticizes the local leadership's focus on personal status over community service and calls for higher expectations from elected officials. 

- The article suggests that Lakeland officials have historically failed to defend local interests against state-level political pressures. 

- The Southern Group and local political figures are accused of protecting state legislators from accountability. 

- The legislative priority list of Lakeland is criticized for its lack of significance and transparency. 

- A recent city commission forum failed to provide meaningful dialogue or accountability from local leaders. 

- The author plans to organize candidate forums to address substantial issues and encourage civic engagement. 

Call for Poetry Submissions – English Journal https://radicalscholarship.com/2025/05/14/call-for-poetry-submissions-english-journal/ via @plthomasEdD 

This article is a call for poetry submissions to the English Journal, edited by Paul Thomas from Furman University. It outlines the submission process and requirements for poets interested in contributing. The journal seeks poems that explore themes central to English education, such as the impact of reading and writing, language, and teaching experiences. Submissions should include a cover sheet with a biographical sketch and up to five original poems. Poets must grant permission for publication and are encouraged to submit shorter pieces. Published poets will receive complimentary copies of the journal issue featuring their work.

### Key Points

- The English Journal is seeking poetry submissions related to English education themes. 

- Submissions require a cover sheet with personal details and a biographical sketch. 

- Poems should be original, not previously published, and shorter pieces are preferred. 

- Poets must complete a consent form for publication and are offered complimentary copies if published. 

Curmudgucation: More Culture Panic From Heritage Foundation | National Education Policy Center https://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/more-culture 

### Key Points

- The Heritage Foundation's Phoenix Declaration outlines a vision for American education rooted in conservative values, emphasizing parental choice, cultural transmission, and character formation. 

- The Declaration promotes the idea of "education freedom" and asserts that parents should have primary responsibility for their children's education, aligning it with their values. 

- Concerns are raised about the potential dangers of prioritizing parental rights over children's welfare and the implications for privatization and collective responsibility in education. 

- The Declaration advocates for education grounded in "objective truth," but critics argue this approach assumes a singular, rigid interpretation of truth and morality. 

- Cultural transmission is framed around preserving "Western and Judeo-Christian traditions," which critics suggest overlooks diversity and the evolving nature of culture. 

- The emphasis on character formation and virtues aligns with social and emotional learning (SEL), though the Declaration critiques SEL as "experimental teaching methods." 

- Academic excellence and patriotism are highlighted, with calls for schools to cultivate gratitude toward American institutions and promote a specific vision of history. 

- The Declaration is criticized for its vague language, ideological bias, and exclusion of pluralistic and diverse perspectives. 

Trump’s Civil Rights Shell Game: Protecting Some, Persecuting Others https://cloakinginequity.com/2025/05/14/trumps-civil-rights-shell-game-protecting-some-persecuting-others/ 

The article discusses the strategic shift in political discourse by Donald Trump and the American right, focusing on anti-Semitism as a singular civil rights issue while neglecting other forms of racism and discrimination. The piece criticizes Trump's selective approach to civil rights, highlighting his history of emboldening white nationalist groups and using civil rights language for political control. It emphasizes the need for a universal, intersectional approach to anti-racism that addresses all forms of hate and discrimination.

### Key Points

- Trump's focus on anti-Semitism is a strategic move rather than a genuine commitment to civil rights. 

- The executive order targeting anti-Semitism lacks parallel actions against other forms of racism and discrimination. 

- The administration is dismantling programs that previously protected marginalized communities. 

- Trump's history includes promoting racist narratives and emboldening hate groups. 

- His selective civil rights actions are politically motivated and ignore other marginalized groups. 

- The article calls for a universal anti-racism approach that is inclusive and intersectional. 

- The current framing of anti-Semitism excludes Arab Americans and is politically convenient. 

- Trump's immigration policies show racial bias, favoring white immigrants over others. 

School Privatization is the Opposite of Populism https://open.substack.com/pub/educationwars/p/school-privatization-is-the-opposite?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 

The article discusses the controversial inclusion of a $5 billion school voucher program in the GOP's tax bill, highlighting how it circumvents the will of voters and benefits wealthy donors. The Educational Choice for Children Act is criticized for being a tax shelter that fuels school privatization and undermines public education funding. Despite opposition from Trump's voter base, who have repeatedly rejected voucher proposals, the GOP is pushing the program through federal legislation. The article also notes internal contradictions within the GOP regarding federal overreach and populism, as well as the potential backlash from both right-wing activists and voters.

### Key Points

- The GOP has included a $5 billion school voucher program in their tax bill, benefiting wealthy donors and undermining public budgets. 

- The program allows donors to reduce their tax bill by donating to nonprofits granting scholarships, which could be popular among wealthy taxpayers. 

- The program is criticized for facilitating tax avoidance and promoting school privatization, against the will of voters who have rejected vouchers. 

- The federal voucher program contradicts the populist ethos and is seen as federal overreach by some conservatives. 

- Internal contradictions within the GOP may cause the bill to fall apart, as the voucher scheme benefits the wealthy and is not populist. 

Teacher Tom: Treating Children Like People Rather than Their Challenging Behavior https://teachertomsblog.blogspot.com/2025/05/treating-children-like-people-rather.html 

Treating Children Like People Rather than Their Challenging Behavior

### Key Points

- The author reflects on challenging behaviors in children, emphasizing that often the issue lies in how adults communicate with them. 

- Language shapes reality; the way adults speak to children can unintentionally discourage independent thinking and provoke resistance. 

- The author developed a 6-week course, "The Technology of Speaking With Children So They Can Think," which focuses on transforming communication to reduce challenging behaviors and foster cooperation. 

- The approach encourages children to make decisions independently and promotes an authoritative, calm teaching style rather than authoritarian tactics. 

- Treating children as individuals rather than focusing solely on their behavior creates environments where self-motivation and peacefulness thrive. 

Seattle Schools Community Forum: Seattle Schools in the News https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2025/05/seattle-schools-in-news.html?spref=tw 

Seattle Public Schools are experiencing a mix of positive developments and ongoing challenges. The newly opened Rainier Beach High School showcases modern facilities and sustainable design, while community health services and specialized learning spaces aim to enhance education. However, issues persist, including inadequate support for Deaf and hard-of-hearing families, safety concerns at Garfield High School, and debates over school waitlists and closures. The district faces criticism for nepotism and transparency in decision-making.

### Key Points

- Rainier Beach High School's new building features modern classrooms, specialized labs, and sustainable design, symbolizing community vision and advocacy. 

- Challenges persist for Deaf and hard-of-hearing families, including inaccessible emergency systems and insufficient ASL interpretation at school board meetings. SPS issued an apology but faces criticism for lack of consistent action. 

- Gun violence and safety concerns at Garfield High School highlight inadequate security measures and policy enforcement, leading to a lawsuit from a victim's family. 

- Parents push for resolving school waitlists, seeking access to specialized option schools, while the district balances enrollment at neighborhood schools. 

- Criticism arises over nepotism within SPS, with concerns about promotions based on personal connections rather than merit. 

- Proposed school closures spark debate over financial savings versus community impact, with questions about transparency and planning. 

Seattle Schools Community Forum: Seattle School Board Meeting, May 14, 2025 https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2025/05/seattle-school-board-meeting-may-14-2025.html?spref=tw 

Seattle School Board Meeting Summary

### Key Points

- The Seattle School Board meeting on May 14, 2025, included discussions on public engagement, budget, mental health counselors, and the superintendent search. 

- Student board members requested a handbook for future student directors, aiming to improve their participation. 

- Concerns were raised about the lack of progress in community engagement and frustration over unclear roles between staff and the board. 

- Public testimony highlighted issues such as enrollment, waitlists, Memorial Stadium plans, and the need for an ADA coordinator. 

- Updates on school choice assignments revealed challenges in flexibility, equity, and alignment with district goals. 

- The district faces criticism over its long-term strategy of building larger schools and closing neighborhood ones, with concerns about impacts on communities. 

- Allegations of nepotism within Seattle Public Schools were discussed, citing promotions based on personal connections. 

- The district’s plan to close schools to save costs and potentially lease/rent them sparked controversy due to lack of transparency and data. 

Schools Matter: AI and the Death of Human Learning http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2025/05/ai-and-death-of-human-learning.html 

AI and the Death of Human Learning

### Key Points

- The article discusses the impact of AI on education, suggesting that AI might lead to the decline of human learning. 

- It emphasizes the importance of classmates in a child's learning process over the characteristics of teachers, referencing James Coleman. 

- The blog post is part of a larger series of articles addressing various educational issues, including poverty's impact on education and critiques of corporate educational reforms. 

- The blog also includes historical archives and reviews on educational topics, highlighting ongoing debates and challenges in the education sector. 

CURMUDGUCATION: ECCA Is A Boondoggle For The Wealthy https://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2025/05/ecca-is-boondoggle-for-wealthy.html 

ECCA Is A Boondoggle For The Wealthy

### Key Points

- The Education Choice for Children Act (ECCA) primarily benefits wealthy families, allowing households earning up to 300% of the area median gross income to qualify for vouchers. 

- The bill uses a tax credit scholarship model, creating a significant federal revenue loss and serving as a tax shelter for wealthy donors. 

- ECCA avoids voter approval by bypassing direct voter input, a common issue with voucher-related legislation. 

- The bill lacks oversight mechanisms to ensure funds are used effectively or to prevent fraud, discrimination, or misuse by private education providers. 

- ECCA promotes discriminatory practices by subsidizing private schools that can exclude students based on LGBTQ status, religion, or other criteria. 

- The legislation undermines public education by shifting responsibility for education entirely to parents while benefiting wealthy individuals. 

RANKING DONALD J. TRUMP | The Merrow Report https://themerrowreport.com/2025/05/14/ranking-donald-j-trump/ 

The article uses a creative approach to evaluate Donald Trump by ranking him on three aspects of his character and behavior: greed, narcissism, and business acumen. The author provides historical and modern examples of individuals known for these traits and invites readers to compare Trump to them. The article includes lists of historically greedy, narcissistic, and failed business leaders, offering context and examples for readers to assess Trump's position in these categories.

### Key Points  

- The article introduces three lists to rank Donald Trump: greed, narcissism, and business acumen.   

- Readers are given a scoring system to evaluate Trump compared to historical figures.   

- Historical examples of greed include figures like Caligula, Marcus Licinius Crassus, Hetty Green, Leona Helmsley, Leopold II, Bernie Madoff, Imelda Marcos, Queen Ranavalona I, Cecil Rhodes, and John D. Rockefeller.   

- Modern figures such as Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Vladimir Putin are also mentioned as examples of greed.   

- Trump is quoted acknowledging his own greed but framing it as a positive quality for serving the United States.   

- The article transitions to narcissism, defining it and listing examples such as Adolf Hitler, Ted Bundy, Cleopatra, Jim Jones, Kim Jong Un, Kim Kardashian, Madonna, King Louis XIV, Elon Musk, and Joseph Stalin.   

- Trump is described as a textbook narcissist with traits like self-centeredness, thin skin, and neglect of responsibilities.   

- The third list evaluates the worst business leaders, including John Akers (IBM), Leo Apotheker (HP), Steven Ballmer (Microsoft), Carly Fiorina (HP), Fred Goodwin (RBS), Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos), Ron Johnson (J.C. Penney), Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling (Enron), Bob Nardelli (Home Depot), and Martin Winterkorn (Volkswagen).   

- Trump’s business failures, such as Trump Airlines, Trump Beverages, Trump Game, and Trump Casinos, are highlighted, along with his multiple bankruptcies.   

- The article invites readers to rank Trump among the worst business leaders and share their scores. 

May Revision to the Governor’s Proposed Budget - Year 2025 (CA Dept of Education) https://www.cde.ca.gov/nr/ne/yr25/yr25rel26.asp

State Superintendent Tony Thurmond praised Governor Gavin Newsom’s revised budget plan for prioritizing funding initiatives that improve student achievement. The budget includes investments in expanded learning programs, literacy educator training, reading difficulty screeners, and universal transitional kindergarten. Superintendent Thurmond highlighted the success of these initiatives, such as increased enrollment in transitional kindergarten, reduced chronic absenteeism, and improved test scores through specialized technical assistance for local educational agencies. The proposed budget allocates $525 million for expanded learning programs, $200 million for literacy professional development, $10 million for reading screeners, and full funding for universal transitional kindergarten.

### Key Points

- Governor Newsom’s revised budget supports expanded learning programs, literacy educator training, and universal transitional kindergarten. 

- Superintendent Thurmond emphasized the positive impact of these initiatives on student achievement and chronic absenteeism. 

- The budget proposes $525 million for expanded learning programs, $200 million for professional development, and $10 million for reading difficulty screeners. 

- Transitional kindergarten enrollment has doubled, and test scores have improved due to targeted funding strategies. 

- Superintendent Thurmond established a cohort of 250 local educational agencies for technical assistance to maximize funding impact. 

 BIG EDUCATION TOP READS THIS WEEK 5-4 TO 5-14 2025 https://open.substack.com/pub/ru4people/p/big-education-top-reads-this-week?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 

This week's edition of Big Education Ape covers a range of topics, from political dynamics within the Democratic National Committee to the impact of billionaire-funded education reforms. The articles explore themes such as the intersection of politics and education, the role of influential figures like Bill Gates and Donald Trump, and ongoing debates about church-state separation. Additionally, there is a roundup of notable blog posts providing insights into current events and historical perspectives.

### Key Points

- The DNC's challenges involving David Hogg highlight procedural issues and youthful rebellion. 

- The implications of Trump's mission to support white Afrikaner refugees are discussed. 

- Bill Gates' influence on public education is questioned regarding accountability. 

- Pope Leo XIV's first speech signals potential changes within the Catholic Church. 

- The rule of law and due process are examined in the context of Trump's presidency. 

- The separation of church and state is revisited through the lens of the Scopes Monkey Trial. 

- A report details the rise and decline of billionaire-funded education reforms. 

- A series of blog posts offer insights into various cultural and political topics. 

- Donald Trump's new book and its themes are highlighted. 

Nichiren: and The Opening of the Eyes: Ultican, Thomas: 9783991306092: Amazon.com: Books 

https://a.co/d/6UW3FYP #Amazon via @Amazon

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
5-14-25

The article is a compilation of various blog posts and articles that cover a wide range of topics including education reforms, political activism, immigration issues, and systemic societal challenges. It highlights critiques of Trump administration policies, the influence of corporate interests in education, and grassroots efforts for reform and inclusivity.

### Key Points

- The NEA criticizes Trump's budget for deep cuts and promoting privatization through vouchers and charter schools. 

- Project 2025 proposes turning major federal education funding into block grants, reducing oversight. 

- Marc Elias's Democracy Docket is a platform to stay informed about democracy-related issues, led by lawyer Marc Elias. 

- President Trump's executive order aims to ban the use of disparate impact in civil rights investigations, potentially weakening protections against discrimination. 

- The Seattle Schools Board is conducting meetings on the superintendent search and employee issues, including potential changes in leadership. 

- The article discusses the decline in proficiency of Ohio students using vouchers, noting a drop from 75% to 54% over three years. 

- The GOP proposes a decade-long ban on AI regulation, prioritizing corporate profit over public safety and education. 

- ICE conducted a raid in Maui, targeting immigrants, including Filipino teachers, under the guise of national security enforcement. 

- The trend to ban smartphones and reduce digital technology in schools is critiqued as conservative and reactionary. 

- President Trump initiated a mission to offer refuge to white South African farmers, citing racial discrimination and violence. 

- Bill Gates attempted to reform public education by applying corporate principles, which ultimately failed. 

- Teacher Tom emphasizes a child-directed, play-based learning approach, challenging traditional notions of "school" and "teacher." 

- Teach Truth received a positive review from Kirkus, emphasizing its inspirational and well-researched content advocating for antiracist education. 

- The proposal for a national Big Standardized Test is critiqued as a repackaged failed idea, suggesting that using the existing NAEP for all students annually is unnecessary.