Latest News and Comment from Education

Sunday, May 11, 2025

WILL HISTORY HOLD BILL GATES ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF PUBLIC EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES

 

WILL HISTORY HOLD BILL GATES ACCOUNTABLE
FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF PUBLIC EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES

Ah, Bill Gates—a name synonymous with tech wizardry, philanthropic billions, and, apparently, the wrecking ball that swung a bit too hard at the fragile scaffolding of public education in America. While most people know Gates as the bespectacled genius who brought us Microsoft Office and endless Windows updates (some of which crashed our computers mid-term paper), fewer are aware of his ambitious foray into education reform. But here’s the kicker: Gates’ well-intentioned meddling in schools didn’t just ruffle a few feathers; it sent the entire henhouse into chaos. So, will history hold him accountable for this educational debacle? Or will he simply escape into the philanthropic sunset, leaving behind a trail of standardized test bubbles and underfunded schools?

Let’s dive in, shall we?

The Gates Empire Strikes Back (at Public Education)

Bill Gates didn’t wake up one morning and decide to destroy public education. No, no. That would be too cartoonishly villainous, even for a billionaire. Instead, like many well-meaning tech moguls with more money than sense, Gates genuinely believed he could “fix” education. After all, if you can debug software, why not debug an entire school system? Armed with billions of dollars and an unshakable faith in data-driven solutions, Gates ventured into the world of public education reform like a knight on a white horse—except this knight brought along spreadsheets, algorithms, and a penchant for standardized testing.

Enter the Common Core State Standards, a Gates-funded initiative that swept across the nation faster than you could say “No Child Left Behind.” The idea was simple: create a unified set of academic standards so that students in Mississippi and Massachusetts would learn the same things at the same pace. Sounds great on paper, right? Except that in practice, it turned classrooms into test-prep factories, angered parents who couldn’t decipher their kids’ math homework, and left teachers feeling like robots programmed to teach to a test.

But Gates didn’t stop there. Oh no. His foundation poured billions into charter schools  programs, effectively undermining public schools by diverting funds to privately-run institutions. It was like inviting a fox into the henhouse and then acting surprised when feathers started flying. Charter schools promised innovation and choice but often delivered segregation and inequality. Meanwhile, public schools—already struggling under the weight of budget cuts—were left to fend for themselves with fewer resources and more students.

The Zombie Apocalypse: Jim Crow Edition

One of the most chilling consequences of Gates’ reforms has been the resurgence of segregation in American schools. Yes, you read that right. Thanks to charter schools and voucher programs, we’ve managed to resurrect Jim Crow like a zombie in a bad horror movie. Only this time, he’s armed with PowerPoint presentations and corporate jargon.

Here’s how it works: Charter schools often cherry-pick students, leaving behind those with disabilities, behavioral issues, or language barriers. Voucher programs funnel taxpayer dollars into private schools that aren’t held to the same accountability standards as public institutions. The result? A two-tiered education system where affluent families get shiny new options while low-income students—disproportionately students of color—are left in underfunded and overcrowded public schools.

And where is Bill Gates in all this? Silent as a mouse navigating a Windows 95 error screen. Despite being the father of corporate school reform, Gates has never publicly addressed the rise of segregation or the negative impacts of charter schools and vouchers. It’s almost as if billionaires have a magical ability to dodge accountability while still collecting accolades for their “philanthropy.”

The Standardized Testing Circus

If there’s one thing Gates loves more than Excel spreadsheets, it’s standardized testing. To him, tests are the ultimate tool for measuring success—whether you’re troubleshooting software bugs or evaluating student performance. But here’s the problem: kids aren’t code.

The obsession with standardized testing has turned schools into pressure cookers where students are reduced to numbers and teachers are judged by their ability to produce high test scores. Creativity? Out the window. Critical thinking? Who has time for that when there are multiple-choice questions to answer? It’s no wonder parents across the country have revolted against this testing frenzy, opting their kids out of exams and demanding a return to sanity.

And let’s not forget the teachers—those brave souls who are expected to perform miracles with dwindling resources while being micromanaged by billionaires who’ve never set foot in a classroom. Imagine being evaluated not on your ability to inspire young minds but on how well your students bubble in Scantron sheets. It’s enough to make even the most dedicated educator throw in the towel.

The Billionaire Playbook: Never Apologize, Never Explain

One of the perks of being a billionaire oligarch is that you never have to say you’re sorry. When your initiatives fail—or worse, cause harm—you can simply pivot to your next philanthropic project without so much as a backward glance. It’s like playing Monopoly with an infinite supply of Get Out of Jail Free cards.

Gates is hardly alone in this regard. He’s part of a cabal of wealthy individuals—including Reed Hastings, Mark Zuckerberg, and Betsy DeVos—who have used their fortunes to reshape education according to their own visions. But while others may dabble in education reform as a side hustle, Gates has been its undisputed leader. His fingerprints are all over Common Core, charter schools, and standardized testing. Yet when these initiatives backfire, he remains conspicuously absent from the conversation.

Perhaps it’s because billionaires operate on a different plane of existence—one where accountability is optional and criticism is dismissed as the whining of ungrateful peasants. Or perhaps Gates genuinely believes he’s doing more good than harm. After all, he recently announced plans to give away nearly all his wealth through the Gates Foundation, doubling its contributions to over $200 billion by 2045. That’s a lot of money—and a lot of potential for both progress and unintended consequences.

The Verdict: History’s Judgment Awaits

So, will history hold Bill Gates accountable for the destruction of public education in the United States? It’s hard to say. On one hand, his reforms have undeniably caused harm—undermining public schools, exacerbating inequality, and turning classrooms into test-prep factories. On the other hand, Gates’ philanthropy has also funded life-saving vaccines, global health initiatives, and poverty reduction efforts.

Perhaps history will remember him as a complicated figure—a man whose good intentions sometimes led to disastrous outcomes. Or perhaps it will lump him in with other billionaire meddlers who thought they could solve complex social problems with money and data but ended up making things worse.

One thing is certain: public education deserves better than to be treated as a billionaire’s pet project. It deserves investment, equity, and respect for the expertise of educators who actually know what they’re doing. So let’s hope that future reformers learn from Gates’ mistakes—and that history doesn’t let him off the hook too easily.

In the meantime, we’ll be here—watching from the sidelines with popcorn in hand—as billionaires continue their misguided attempts to save us from ourselves. Because if there’s one thing we’ve learned from Bill Gates’ foray into education reform, it’s this: just because you can reboot a computer doesn’t mean you should try rebooting an entire school system.


Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights: A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts! 5-11-25

 

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
5-11-25

Trump Plans Deep Cuts to Interior Department, National Parks Service https://dianeravitch.net/2025/05/10/trump-plans-deep-cuts-to-interior-department-national-parks-service/ via @dianeravitch 

Trump administration plans significant budget cuts and workforce reductions at the Interior Department, particularly targeting the National Park Service (NPS) and other agencies like the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The reductions include layoffs, incentivized departures, and consolidation of department functions, leading to concerns about the agency's ability to maintain operations and morale. Critics argue these cuts undermine the department's mission and essential services.

### Key Points

- The Interior Department, led by Secretary Doug Burgum, plans to cut thousands of jobs, including 1,500 at NPS, with reductions also impacting USGS and BLM. 

- Consolidation of functions at headquarters is seen as a means to facilitate layoffs, with science and cultural resource teams at NPS particularly affected. 

- Critics warn the cuts will harm essential services like fish surveys and park operations, with some statutory functions potentially left unfulfilled. 

- Employees and stakeholders express concerns about low morale, operational failures, and the inability to support Trump administration priorities like leasing and resource management. 

- Critics view the changes as a deliberate attack on effective government functions, with legal challenges likely to follow. 

Senator Chris Murphy Gives a Master Class in Cutting Through B.S. https://dianeravitch.net/2025/05/10/senator-chris-murphy-gives-a-master-class-in-cutting-through-b-s/ via @dianeravitch 

Senator Chris Murphy criticized Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem during a Senate hearing for breaking laws, overspending, deporting people with legal status, and ignoring due process. The blog post highlights Murphy's pointed remarks and expresses broader frustrations with Trump administration officials, accusing them of undermining democracy and governance.

### Key Points

- Senator Chris Murphy accused Kristi Noem of illegal practices, including budget overspending and violating due process rights. 

- The post reflects criticism of Trump-era officials, describing them as harmful to democracy and governance. 

- Readers praised Murphy’s speech as direct and impactful. 

Arkansas: Supporters of Abortion Rights Meet, Protestors Don't Show Up https://dianeravitch.net/2025/05/10/arkansas-supporters-of-abortion-rights-meet-protestors-dont-show-up/ via @dianeravitch 

Arkansas: Supporters of Abortion Rights Meet, Protestors Don’t Show Up By dianeravitch May 10, 2025 // 0 Arkansas is deep-red, so of course the Legislature banned abortion. Supporters of abortion rights gathered enough signatures to put the issue to the voters, but the politicians knocked their referendum off the ballot. But the issue has not gone away. I thought readers might like to read about the persistence of abortion right supporters. The Arkansas Times is a dissident website that keeps readers informed about events like this one. If you want to know what Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders is doing, this is a great source. Austin Gelder wrote about the annual planned parenthood Garden Party: For proof of the sorry state of reproductive rights in Arkansas, consider that

### Key Points

- Arkansas has banned abortion, with supporters of abortion rights facing challenges in getting a referendum on the ballot. Despite setbacks, advocacy persists. 

- Anti-abortion protests at Planned Parenthood events have diminished, with the focus shifting to other issues like transgender rights and immigration. 

- Arkansas has some of the worst maternal and child health outcomes, yet continues to implement restrictive policies on reproductive health. 

- Planned Parenthood in Arkansas is adapting to restrictions, sharing strategies with affiliates in other states, and seeing a rise in patients for non-abortion services. 

- Advocates at events like the Planned Parenthood Garden Party emphasize resilience and creativity in fighting for reproductive rights despite federal and state-level challenges. 



NAEP: A Modest Proposal https://radicalscholarship.com/2025/05/10/naep-a-modest-proposal/ via @plthomasEdD 

The article critiques the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a standardized test in the U.S., highlighting its flaws and its role in perpetuating a false narrative of educational crisis. It argues that the NAEP's achievement levels are misleading and often misinterpreted, leading to exaggerated claims about student performance. The article connects NAEP's origins to accountability-driven education reforms and criticizes the excessive reliance on standardized testing, which it claims reflects socioeconomic disparities rather than actual educational quality. The author proposes renaming achievement levels to align with age-level performance metrics as a step toward reforming NAEP and addressing systemic issues in education.

### Key Points

- NAEP is a misunderstood and misrepresented test, often misused to declare an educational crisis. 

- Achievement levels like "proficient" are misleading and create false perceptions of failure. 

- NAEP originated from accountability-focused education reforms tied to the Reagan administration. 

- Standardized testing results are heavily influenced by socioeconomic factors, which schools cannot control. 

- Policies relying on test results unfairly reward advantaged schools and penalize disadvantaged ones. 

- The author proposes renaming achievement levels to "below age level," "age level," and "above age level" for clarity. 

- Excessive testing has failed to improve education and instead perpetuates a state of crisis for political and market agendas. 



Vallas takes a poke at Trump's D.O.E. But it was just a head fake.  https://open.substack.com/pub/klonsky/p/vallas-takes-a-poke-at-trumps-doe?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 

### Key Points

- Paul Vallas, a policy adviser and CEO of a charter school start-up group, critiques Trump’s Department of Education but ultimately supports privatizing schools, vouchers, and weakening teacher unions. 

- Vallas criticizes Chicago Public Schools (CPS) and advocates for replacing them with charter schools, claiming they are failing due to systemic issues tied to income and ZIP codes. 

- His argument relies on standardized test scores to label CPS schools as failing, ignoring the correlation between test scores and family income. Wealthier districts perform better globally, while poorer districts struggle. 

- Research shows charter schools and vouchers do not outperform public schools and often underperform. Vallas’ claims about teachers' unions shutting down charter schools are misleading, as unions have worked to support and unionize charter schools. 

- Vallas’ alignment with MAGA policies and his attacks on teacher unions suggest his criticism of Trump’s education policies is a diversion, aligning with broader goals to privatize public education. 




Schools Matter: Tell Congress to Stop the Presidential Crime Wave http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2025/05/tell-congress-to-stop-presidential.html

### Key Points

- The blog highlights the importance of classmates' characteristics over teachers in influencing a child's learning, referencing James Coleman's statement from 1972. 

- It discusses political activism, urging Congress to impeach Trump and address a "Presidential Crime Wave." 

- The article critiques corporate education reforms, including "No Excuses" teaching and charter school models, linking them to systemic issues like poverty and compliance-driven systems. 

- The blog emphasizes poverty as a key factor affecting education outcomes, contrasting it with the focus on teacher quality. 

- It references Hillary Clinton's alleged role in promoting corporate charter schools in Haiti, as revealed by WikiLeaks. 

- The blog archives contain extensive commentary on educational policies, testing, and reforms over the years, with critiques of standardized testing and NCLB (No Child Left Behind). 

- Reviews and essays on various educational themes, such as teacher renewal, qualitative research, and the impact of testing, are included. 

Schools Matter: Nationalize, Stigmatize, Penalize: Corporate Education's Recurring Fever Dream Recast http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2025/05/nationalize-stigmatize-penalize.html 

Schools Matter: Analysis of Corporate Education and Testing Culture

### Key Points

- The blog critiques corporate-driven education reforms, highlighting their focus on standardized testing and penalization rather than addressing systemic issues like poverty. 

- It references the recurring push for privatized education models, including corporate charter schools, and their detrimental effects on public education systems. 

- The article discusses broader societal issues tied to education, such as economic inequality, political agendas, and the influence of corporate interests in shaping education policy. 

- The blog emphasizes the need for systemic change, including resistance to over-testing and a focus on equity in education. 



CURMUDGUCATION: The Failed Case for Super-NAEPery https://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2025/05/the-failed-case-for-super-naepery.html 

The article critiques a proposal to expand the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) into an annual, universal standardized test for all 4th and 8th graders in the U.S. The author argues that such a move would repeat past failures of national standardized testing initiatives, such as those linked to Common Core, and would lead to federal overreach, ineffective accountability, and misaligned educational goals. The writer emphasizes that standardized tests like NAEP have historically failed to solve systemic educational issues and questions the practicality and necessity of the proposed reforms.

### Key Points

- The proposal to expand NAEP into a universal, annual test repeats past failed attempts at national standardized testing. 

- Standardized test scores are incorrectly expected to rise perpetually, which is an unrealistic and flawed assumption. 

- Using NAEP for accountability and federal control over local curricula is criticized as intrusive and counterproductive. 

- The belief that standardized tests can provide actionable data to improve education is challenged, as past efforts have not yielded meaningful results. 

- The article questions the practicality of using NAEP for multiple purposes, such as informing parents, educators, and policymakers simultaneously. 



Big Education Ape: BIG EDUCATION TOP READS THIS WEEK: 5-4 TO 5-10 2025 https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/05/big-education-top-reads-this-week.html 


Schools, education policy, and societal issues dominate the article, discussing topics such as school vouchers, charter schools, abortion rights protests, and critiques of education reform. It also highlights various blog posts, books, and resources related to public education advocacy and political commentary.

### Key Points

- Discussion on Paul Vallas's stance on school vouchers, charter schools, and teacher unions. 

- Arkansas abortion rights supporters gather signatures for a vote, reflecting political activism in a conservative state. 

- Overview of the influence of standardized testing, particularly the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). 

- Highlights from "Big Education Ape," including critiques of billionaire-funded education reforms and the separation of church and state. 

- Mention of Donny Trump’s book and commentary on Trump-era policies. 

- Blog series "Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights" curates notable education-related articles. 

- Resources and organizations supporting public education, such as Diane Ravitch’s blog and the Badass Teachers Association. 

- Advocacy against privatization in education and promotion of public education reform. 



Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
5-10-25

The article compiles a wide range of topics spanning education, politics, religion, and social issues. Key discussions include Pope Leo XIV's progressive election, critiques of education policies, the challenges of AI in education, Trump's controversial proposals, and systemic issues affecting democracy and inclusivity. The overarching themes emphasize activism, reform, and the importance of protecting democratic principles.

### Key Points  

- Pope Leo XIV, the first American-born and Peruvian pope with Afro-Caribbean roots, continues Pope Francis's progressive legacy, focusing on social justice, workers' rights, and inclusivity.   

- Critics label Pope Leo XIV a "Woke Marxist," reflecting polarized reactions to his progressive ideals.   

- Former President Trump proposed reopening Alcatraz prison, a costly and impractical idea criticized as a distraction from political controversies.   

- New York Governor Hochul faced criticism for compromising with ultra-Orthodox Jewish yeshivas that fail to meet educational standards, undermining equality in education.   

- A federal judge ordered the release of Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts graduate student detained by ICE for writing an op-ed critical of Israel, citing violations of free speech and due process.   

- Over-reliance on AI in education risks undermining critical thinking, perpetuating inequality, and damaging intellectual growth.   

- Proposals to expand NAEP into universal standardized testing are criticized for federal overreach and failing to address systemic educational issues.   

- Teacher Tom emphasizes the value of play-based learning, dignity, and respect in fostering independent and cooperative children.   

- Trump administration policies weakened protections for marginalized students, dismantling civil rights offices and reducing diversity initiatives.   

- Bill Gates’s influence on education policy, driven by technology and corporate interests, often undermines democracy and perpetuates inequality.   

- Activism and grassroots efforts are essential to resisting authoritarian policies and promoting democratic values.   

- Seattle Public Schools' enrollment practices harm equity and drive families away, leading to funding losses and program cuts.   

- Teacher appreciation is undermined by systemic disrespect, privatization, and reduced teacher roles in public education.   

- Community schools in Wisconsin are highlighted as transformative models addressing systemic inequalities.   

- STEM stereotypes and limited early exposure hinder gender diversity in engineering and computer science.   

- Eating disorders on college campuses are a hidden crisis, with programs like Body U addressing the issue.