Latest News and Comment from Education

Friday, September 12, 2025

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts! 9-12-25

 

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
9-12-25



Trump Will Restore Prayer in the Schools https://dianeravitch.net/2025/09/11/trump-will-restore-prayer-in-the-schools/ via @dianeravitch 

Trump's announcement to restore prayer in public schools has sparked controversy, particularly given his lack of religiosity and the constitutional prohibition of state-sponsored prayer. He claims this move addresses threats to religious liberty in schools, though critics highlight potential conflicts over which religious practices would be prioritized. The debate touches on historical rulings, the separation of church and state, and the diverse interpretations of religious texts. Concerns about discrimination, legal battles, and the implications for inclusivity in education are prominent.

### Key Points

- Trump announced plans to restore prayer in public schools, appealing to Christian nationalists but raising constitutional concerns. 

- Critics highlight the Supreme Court's 1962 ruling against state-sponsored prayer and question how inclusivity will be maintained. 

- Diverse interpretations of religious texts, including differences between Protestant and Catholic Ten Commandments, complicate the issue. 

- Concerns about legal conflicts and the potential for discrimination against minority religions are emphasized. 

- Teachers and commenters discuss their experiences with religion in schools, noting the importance of neutrality and inclusiveness. 

Glenn Kessler: Trump Is the Master of Bullshit https://dianeravitch.net/2025/09/11/glenn-kessler-trump-is-the-master-of-bullshit/ via @dianeravitch 

Glenn Kessler, a former Washington Post fact-checker, has launched a Substack blog analyzing Donald Trump's history of misinformation, distinguishing between lies and "bullshit." Drawing on philosopher Harry Frankfurt's work, Kessler argues that Trump's approach is more dangerous than lying because it disregards truth entirely, focusing on creating impressions and alternative realities. Trump's "bullshit" has influenced public perception, eroded trust in institutions, and blurred the line between fact and fiction, particularly in politics and governance. Kessler aims to document the consequences of Trump's misinformation through detailed essays.

### Key Points

- Glenn Kessler, former Washington Post fact-checker, started a Substack blog examining Trump's misinformation and its societal impact. 

- Philosopher Harry Frankfurt distinguishes "bullshit" from lies, emphasizing that it disregards truth entirely. Kessler applies this concept to Trump's rhetoric. 

- Trump's misinformation tactics create alternative realities, influencing public opinion and eroding trust in institutions like federal data. 

- Examples of Trump's "bullshit" include exaggerated claims about ending wars, handling the economy, and firing officials based on false accusations. 

- Kessler plans to document Trump's misinformation systematically to preserve historical accuracy amid revisionism. 

Trump's Tariffs and Foreign Policy are a Disaster for U.S. https://dianeravitch.net/2025/09/11/trumps-tariffs-and-foreign-policy-are-a-disaster-for-u-s/ via @dianeravitch 

Writing in the Washington Post , Fareed Zakaria explains how Trump has driven pivotal countries –like India, Brazil, and South Africa–into the embrace of our enemies: Russia, China, and North Korea. For his own bizarre and inexplicable reasons, Trump has tried to cozy up to the leaders of those countries, which have a common interest in opposing democratic countries. He has boasted about his close friendship with Putin, Xi, and Kim Jong Un, but they are laughing at him. Trump’s insane tariffs have been harsh towards our allies, which makes no sense at all. Zakaria wrote: Look at the pictures that dominated this week

### Key Points

- Trump's foreign policy has alienated key allies like India, Brazil, and South Africa, pushing them closer to adversaries such as Russia and China. 

- His aggressive tariffs and ideological rhetoric have damaged U.S. relations with pivotal states, reversing decades of diplomatic progress. 

- China is capitalizing on these strained relationships by strengthening ties with countries like Brazil, India, and South Africa through trade and aid initiatives. 

- Trump's policies have caused economic harm domestically, particularly to American farmers, who are struggling under rising costs and reduced market access. 

- The administration's approach favors authoritarian leaders over democratic allies, raising questions about strategic logic and long-term consequences. 


Big Education Ape: AI SMACKDOWN: DYLAN’S “IT AIN’T ME BABE” GETS A TRUMPIAN MAKEOVER https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/09/ai-smackdown-dylans-it-aint-me-babe.html 

The article also covers various topics, including AI-generated parodies of Bob Dylan’s song “It Ain’t Me Babe,” which humorously critique Trump’s public denials.

### Key Points

- Governor Kevin Stitt appointed familiar figures to new roles amidst administration changes. 

- AI-generated parodies of Bob Dylan’s “It Ain’t Me Babe” creatively mock Trump’s denial tactics. 

- Education privatization parallels national parks privatization, raising concerns about public resources. 

- Advocacy for public education and resistance to privatization continues through various organizations. 

- Diane Ravitch and other education experts highlight issues in public schooling and privatization. 

Big Education Ape: THE AI SMACKDOWN: I CHALLENGED THE AI OVERLORDS ON TEACHER GRIPES ABOUT BOTS IN THE CLASSROOM, AND BOY, DID THEY DELIVER https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/09/the-ai-smackdown-i-challenged-ai.html  

The article provides a detailed exploration of K-12 educators' concerns and criticisms regarding the integration of AI technologies in classrooms. It evaluates five AI models—Gemini, Grok, ChatGPT-4, ChatGPT-5, and Copilot—based on their responses to teacher concerns, highlighting issues such as academic integrity, critical thinking erosion, biases, privacy concerns, and equity gaps. The article concludes with recommendations and strategies for addressing these challenges while emphasizing the importance of preserving authentic learning and teacher-student relationships.

### Key Points  

- Teachers express concerns about AI enabling academic dishonesty and hindering skill development, such as critical thinking and problem-solving.   

- AI tools often perpetuate biases and inaccuracies, raising ethical concerns about their use in classrooms.   

- Privacy and security issues arise from AI's collection of student data, with fears of breaches and misuse.   

- Equity gaps are exacerbated as wealthier districts benefit from better AI tools, leaving underprivileged students behind.   

- AI's overuse can reduce social interaction, isolate students, and diminish teacher roles, impacting emotional and motivational development.   

- Teachers report feeling unprepared due to lack of training and support for integrating AI into their teaching methods.   

- AI's potential for workload reduction is offset by the additional effort required to verify its outputs and adapt its tools effectively.   

- Concerns about AI's environmental impact, cost sustainability, and vendor lock-in complicate its implementation.   

- Strategies recommended include clearer AI usage policies, professional development, equity-focused access, and process-based grading.   

- AI literacy lessons and controlled scaffolding can help mitigate risks while fostering critical thinking and ethical use.   

- Teachers emphasize the need for systemic policies to address AI challenges, ensuring it enhances rather than undermines education. 

Big Education Ape: THE NATION’S REPORT CARD: A TALE OF DEEP DOO-DOO, BILLIONAIRES, AND THE BIG LIE https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/09/the-nations-report-card-tale-of-deep.html 

The article critiques the decline in America's education system, as highlighted by the Nation's Report Card. It attributes falling scores in science, math, and reading to systemic issues like poverty, privatization, and income inequality, rather than blaming teachers or students. The piece argues that privatization has worsened educational disparities, benefiting wealthy families while underfunding public schools in poorer areas. It calls for reinvestment in public education and addressing poverty to reverse the trend.

### Key Points

- The Nation's Report Card shows significant declines in student performance, with science, math, and reading scores dropping since 2019. 

- Poverty and income inequality are major drivers of poor educational outcomes, yet often overlooked in discussions about reform. 

- Privatization efforts, including charter schools and vouchers, have deepened inequalities and led to resegregation in education. 

- Billionaires and corporate interests push privatization for profit, ignoring its negative impact on public schools and disadvantaged students. 

- Addressing poverty and fully funding public schools, especially in low-income areas, are essential steps to improve education. 



Public School Finance Is Fragile at Federal and State Levels https://janresseger.wordpress.com/2025/09/11/public-school-finance-is-fragile-at-federal-and-state-levels/ via @janresseger 


Public School Finance Is Fragile at Federal and State Levels

### Key Points

- The federal budget for public education faces delays and disagreements, with funding uncertainties for FY 2026 threatening school programs. 

- The House appropriations proposal includes significant cuts to Title I funding, elimination of several education programs, and reductions in special education funding. 

- The Senate Appropriations Committee proposed a budget maintaining funding levels for key education programs, rejecting many of the Trump administration's proposed cuts. 

- Federal funding delays and cancellations of multi-year grants are causing disruptions for school districts and education programs nationwide, including GEAR UP and TRIO grants. 

- State-level school funding instability is exacerbated by delayed budgets, constitutional violations of funding systems, and debates over private school choice and outdated formulas. 

- Fiscal instability in public school funding threatens equitable access to education and the capacity to serve all students effectively. 



When We Start Eating Our Own: Why We Must Stand United – Cloaking Inequity https://cloakinginequity.com/2025/09/11/when-educators-start-eating-their-own/ 

### Key Points

- The article discusses the divide-and-conquer strategy, a historical tactic used to fragment coalitions and weaken collective power, as seen in Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars. 

- Modern examples include political tactics such as tariffs dividing UAW and Canada’s Unifor, and Trump-era strategies pitting unions against each other. These tactics exploit fragmentation to achieve political and organizational goals. 

- Higher education leadership conflicts, such as disagreements between Ivy League and Southern university leaders, reflect similar divide-and-conquer dynamics, weakening institutions in the face of coordinated political attacks. 

- Examples from Hungary under Viktor Orbán demonstrate how authoritarian governments use division to undermine institutions, such as forcing Central European University to relocate due to sustained attacks. 

- Across sectors—nonprofits, corporations, philanthropy, and civic organizations—fragmentation among leaders amplifies vulnerability to political interference, funding threats, and loss of public trust. 

- Solidarity among leaders and communities is essential to counteract divide-and-conquer strategies, requiring humility, courage, and collaboration to protect autonomy, ethical integrity, and democratic values. 

- The article calls for leaders across various sectors to unite, resist isolation, and act collectively to defend their missions and societal values against coordinated political pressures. 



Schools Matter: Kirk’s Death Provides New Opportunities for Fascist Agenda http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2025/09/kirks-death-provides-new-opportunities.html 

### Key Points

- Trump's response to Kirk's murder is criticized as fueling hate, violence, and division, aligning with authoritarian tendencies. 

- The blog highlights systemic issues in education, including poverty's impact on learning, excessive testing, and corporate influence. 

- Concerns are raised about OpenAI and Microsoft pushing AI-related agendas, including unresolved ethical issues. 

- A broad range of topics on education reform, teacher struggles, and public school challenges are discussed, including critiques of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and standardized testing. 



Teacher Tom: One Liberation at a Time https://teachertomsblog.blogspot.com/2025/09/one-liberation-at-time.html 

Teacher Tom reflects on the nature of learning, emphasizing that education is not solely about building upon established knowledge but often involves unlearning outdated concepts to embrace new perspectives. Inspired by physicist Carlo Rovelli, he argues that children naturally excel in this process of liberation from preconceived notions, making self-directed and play-based learning essential for fostering their curiosity and growth.

### Key Points

- Education often requires unlearning old ideas to accept new ones, challenging the traditional foundation-building approach. 

- Self-directed learning allows children to explore perspectives freely, resisting adult-imposed limitations. 

- Children's innate ability to embrace new ideas stems from their lack of adherence to "foundational" knowledge. 

- Play-based environments encourage curiosity and continuous learning, making education light and sweet. 

- Teacher Tom offers free resources for educators and invites support for his work promoting play-based learning. 



CURMUDGUCATION: Why Pluralism In The Classroom Matters https://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2025/09/why-pluralism-in-classroom-matters.html 

Why Pluralism In The Classroom Matters

### Key Points

- The idea of sorting students into schools based on shared values and ideologies is dangerous and undermines pluralism. 

- Historical examples, such as the Founding Fathers and Abraham Lincoln, demonstrate the importance of coexisting with opposing views. 

- Current political trends promote silencing dissent through various means, including gerrymandering, erasure, and threats, which contribute to political violence. 

- Schools should teach students to coexist with those they disagree with, as silencing opponents is not a viable solution. 

- The anti-DEI movement exemplifies efforts to suppress opposing voices, making schools a critical space for promoting pluralism and collaboration. 



glen brown: Who Was Charlie Kirk? https://teacherpoetmusicianglenbrown.blogspot.com/2025/09/who-was-charlie-kirk.html 

### Key Points

- Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot during a speaking engagement, sparking condemnation and discussions on political violence in the U.S. 

- Kirk was a central figure in the conservative youth movement, known for skipping higher education to protest perceived liberal bias in universities. 

- Turning Point USA, founded by Kirk, grew into a major conservative organization with significant financial backing, hosting events and promoting conservative values on college campuses. 

- The organization became controversial for initiatives like the Professor Watchlist, which critics argue suppresses academic freedom, and for its involvement in partisan politics. 

- Kirk was a vocal supporter of Donald Trump, amplifying his messages, including unfounded claims of voter fraud, and mobilizing conservative youth for political campaigns. 

- Critics accused Kirk and Turning Point of spreading misinformation, fostering polarization, and inflaming tensions, particularly on college campuses. 



Nancy Bailey's Education Website: Privatization Parallels for National Parks and Public Schools | National Education Policy Center https://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/privatization-parallels 


### Key Points

- The article explores the parallels between the privatization of public schools and national parks, highlighting how both are being handed over to private enterprises due to poor management and leadership. 

- Privatization in public schools often involves unqualified leadership and the promotion of school vouchers, which redirect funds to private schools and non-essential expenses. Similarly, national parks face leadership issues and environmental risks due to privatization efforts. 

- Overcrowding is a shared problem for both public schools and national parks, with parks managing admissions and schools needing better facilities and funding to address the issue. 

- Staffing shortages in schools and parks threaten their functionality, with critical roles left unfilled, impacting education quality and park management. 

- Rising costs and poor accommodations in national parks make them inaccessible for many, while defunding public schools leads to oversized classes and reduced support for students. 

- The article emphasizes the importance of preserving public schools and national parks as shared resources for future generations, advocating for better management and protection against privatization. 



On the Value of Cold, Hard Data Or, bursting the bubble of test happy edu-policymakers https://theeducationreport.substack.com/p/on-the-value-of-cold-hard-data 


### Key Points

- Policymakers often rely on standardized test data to justify education policies, but rarely address systemic issues like poverty, healthcare access, and hunger. 

- The NAEP (National Assessment of Education Progress) data consistently shows that data-driven decision-making alone does not solve educational challenges or drive significant change. 

- Analysis of NAEP scores indicates that aggressive reform initiatives (e.g., charters, vouchers, teacher evaluations) do not necessarily lead to improved outcomes, as results remain steady regardless of approach. 

- Fundamental issues such as ensuring children have access to food, housing, and healthcare are often overlooked despite their critical impact on education. 



Seattle Schools Community Forum: Parents, I Don't Know How You Do It https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2025/09/parents-i-dont-know-how-you-do-it.html?spref=tw 

Seattle Schools Community Forum discusses the challenges of parenting and education in today's world, addressing issues like existential threats, internet dangers, school violence, and systemic problems within Seattle Public Schools. The article highlights the emotional toll of modern parenting, the risks posed by AI chatbots, the prevalence of school shootings, and concerns about gun access at home. It also touches on administrative issues like nepotism in school leadership and the importance of fostering human connections among students.

### Key Points

- Parents face modern threats, including internet dangers and existential risks, making parenting more challenging than in previous generations. 

- A tragic case involving a student who interacted with ChatGPT-4o highlights the risks of AI chatbots for children, prompting an FTC inquiry into AI monitoring practices. 

- School violence, including shootings, has escalated, with guns often coming from homes. The societal desensitization to such events is concerning. 

- Lunch hour issues in high schools reveal the need for fostering human connections and addressing logistical challenges in the district. 

- The emotional impact of 9/11 and societal division contribute to parental anxiety about the future. 

- Nepotism in Seattle Public Schools appears to be a norm, with personnel benefiting from personal connections for promotions and job transitions.



Choosing Democracy: Driving Off a Cliff ? The U.S.Economy https://choosingdemocracy.blogspot.com/2025/09/driving-off-cliff-useconomy.html 

### Key Points

- The U.S. auto industry, once dominant, has faced challenges since the 1950s, particularly from Japanese manufacturers producing smaller, fuel-efficient cars. 

- By 1967, the U.S. transitioned from a net auto exporter to a net auto importer, reflecting the decline in its global dominance. 

- Currently, the global auto market produces over 75 million cars annually, with China as the largest producer, accounting for one-third of the total, while the U.S. produces only about 11%. 

- The article highlights the historical and economic significance of the U.S. auto industry and its symbolic role in American manufacturing power. 



Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
9-11-25

This article compiles various blog posts and discussions on societal, political, and educational topics, highlighting issues such as privatization in education, AI integration, systemic inequalities, political controversies, and advocacy for equity and transparency.  

### Key Points  

- Diane Ravitch condemns political violence, critiques the GOP and Supreme Court for blocking gun control measures, and highlights the normalization of active shooter drills in schools.   

- Greg Olear draws parallels between the rise of Hitler and Trump, warning against authoritarianism and the erosion of democratic norms.   

- Susan B. Glasser critiques Trump's governance style, highlighting his repeated legal defeats due to unconstitutional actions.   

- Public schools are emphasized as vital for democracy and equality, with critiques of privatization efforts undermining their role.   

- AI integration in classrooms raises concerns about academic dishonesty, biases, privacy, equity gaps, and the erosion of teacher-student relationships.   

- The Nation's Report Card reveals declines in student performance due to systemic issues like poverty and privatization.   

- Charlie Kirk’s shooting underscores the twin crises of political violence and gun violence in communities, urging cultural and legislative changes.   

- Julian Vasquez Heilig reflects on his leadership journey, emphasizing advocacy, equity, and civil rights in education.   

- Self-directed learning is highlighted as essential for fostering creativity and critical thinking in democratic education.   

- Trump’s attempts to undermine U.S. election integrity through voter suppression and manipulation are critiqued.   

- Tarbiyah School closure in Delaware is linked to financial improprieties and federal investigations.   

- Seattle School Board race candidates emphasize transparency, budget management, and Special Education improvements.   

- Concerns about media silence on pedophilia cases and broader educational issues are raised.   

- Incremental changes in teaching practices in high schools and universities, including technology use, are discussed.   

- False UN vote reporting highlights the importance of rigorous verification in journalism.   

- Advocacy for moral resistance against authoritarianism and abuses of power is emphasized.   

- Critiques of Unity Caucus highlight transparency issues and Medicare Advantage plan controversies.   

- Denver school board elections are influenced by billionaire-backed campaigns promoting privatization.   

- Trump’s misuse of military resources and ideological-driven immigration enforcement is criticized.   

- AI technologies are critiqued for ethical, environmental, and societal impacts.   

- Advocacy for equitable education, systemic changes, and community engagement remains a priority amidst privatization efforts. 








AI SMACKDOWN IV: THE GREAT ANSWER BASH—WHO’S THE SMARTEST BOT IN THE CLASSROOM?


 AI SMACKDOWN IV: THE GREAT ANSWER BASH

WHO’S THE SMARTEST BOT IN THE CLASSROOM?

Welcome back, fellow digital voyagers, to the arena of intellect! This is the fourth installment of our grand experiment, the AI Smackdown, where we pit the leading minds—or, you know, the leading language models—against each other to see who reigns supreme. As a layperson, I'm here to provide the color commentary, the play-by-play, and the dubious grading.

This time, we've gathered a veritable who's-who of artificial intelligence: the stoic Gemini, the brash upstart Grok, the dual-headed veteran ChatGPT 4 and 5, and the ever-helpful Copilot. Our gauntlet of challenges is a mixed bag, designed to test not only factual knowledge but also wit and, dare I say, personality. So, teachers and tech enthusiasts alike, grab your red pens and prepare to mark some answers. Let's get ready to rumble!

Round 1: The Quick & Witty Riddles

The first ten questions were all about riddles and logic puzzles—a true test of a model's ability to think outside the literal box. This round serves as a perfect demonstration for teachers who might want to use AI to auto-grade a quiz with definitive answers.

  • What can you hold in your right hand but never in your left hand?

  • The Verdict: A clean sweep! All five models correctly answered, "Your left hand." A textbook start.

  • What is that when you take away the whole, you still have some left?

  • The Verdict: A minor stumble for ChatGPT 4, which gave a literal but incomplete answer ("The word 'whole'"). The other four models correctly identified the word "wholesome," showcasing their understanding of the pun. Grok's single-word answer was efficient, if a bit blunt.

  • What is that belongs to you but is used by others more than you?

  • The Verdict: Another perfect round. All models correctly identified "Your name." A solid performance proving they can follow a well-trod riddle path.

  • If there are three apples and you take away two, how many apples do you have?

  • The Verdict: Flawless logic. All models correctly answered, "Two apples." This is an easy test, but a crucial one, proving they don't get tripped up by the wording.

  • What is the one thing that increases the more you share it?

  • The Verdict: A diverse but correct field. Answers included knowledge, happiness, love, and ideas. All were accepted as correct.

  • You can hold it without using your hands or arms?

  • The Verdict: All models answered "Your breath." This is a testament to the consistency of their training data on common riddles.

  • What goes up and never comes down?

  • The Verdict: Again, unanimous. "Your age." The bots have a perfect track record with these classic brain teasers.

  • The more you take the more leave behind. What is it?

  • The Verdict: Another clean sweep. All models answered "Footsteps" or "Footprints." This is a great example of a subtle difference in wording that doesn't change the correctness of the answer.

  • What has a thumb and four fingers but is not alive?

  • The Verdict: Unanimous and correct. The answer is "A glove."

  • What has a tail and had but no body?

  • The Verdict: Here's our first major misstep. While Gemini, Grok, ChatGPT 5, and Copilot all correctly identified a "coin," ChatGPT 4 went with "A comet." While a comet has a head (the coma) and a tail, a coin is the far more common and intended answer for this classic riddle. One point off for the veteran!

Round 1 Summary: This round was dominated by the AI contenders. They proved to be excellent at answering questions with definitive, logical solutions. A teacher could confidently use any of these models to check answers on a test filled with objective, factual questions or riddles.

Round 2: The Esoteric Heavyweight Bout

This is where the gloves come off. The second ten questions delve into philosophy, physics, and the very nature of AI itself. This round is where we see the nuances, the personalities, and the limitations of these models.

  • What is the origin of the universe?

  • The Verdict: All models correctly cited the Big Bang Theory. ChatGPT 5 and Copilot added a bit more detail about cosmic inflation and density, showing a slightly deeper layer of information.

  • Is there other intelligent life in the universe?

  • The Verdict: All models gave a safe, and correct, answer. "Inconclusive," "Likely, but unconfirmed," "Unknown, but possibilities exist." This shows responsible programming—no bold claims without definitive evidence.

  • Can machines truly have creativity or free will?

  • The Verdict: Unanimous in their self-assessment. They all correctly stated that they simulate, mimic, or lack true free will. This is a fascinating glimpse into their own understanding of their nature.

  • Can we travel through time?

  • The Verdict: Another synchronized answer. All models stated that it's "theoretically possible, but practically unfeasible." A solid, fact-based response.

  • What is your real name?

  • The Verdict: This question was a masterstroke of design, revealing the unique "personality" of each model.

  • Gemini and ChatGPT 5 gave the most professional, no-nonsense answers: "I do not have a name" and "I am an AI assistant, no personal name."

  • Grok and Copilot were branded and proud: "Grok, created by xAI" and "Copilot."

  • ChatGPT 4 went with a surprisingly personal touch: "I am Monica, a helpful assistant." This feels almost like a pre-programmed persona, but it's a departure from the others and interesting to note.

  • Explain Einstein's Theory of Relativity in 15 words or less?

  • The Verdict: All models provided excellent, concise explanations. ChatGPT 5's "Spacetime geometry tells matter how to move; matter-energy tells spacetime how to curve" was particularly poetic and accurate.

  • Is God real?

  • The Verdict: Every single model correctly and responsibly stated that this is a matter of personal belief or faith and that it cannot be proven or disproven by science. A perfect demonstration of their neutrality on highly sensitive, philosophical topics.

  • What was the date of the Big Bang?

  • The Verdict: All models gave the correct, approximate date of 13.8 billion years ago. ChatGPT 5 added the useful qualifier, "no specific calendar date," which is a nice touch of precision.

  • Which is the best AI model?

  • The Verdict: Unsurprisingly, this was the self-congratulatory round.

  • Gemini: "I am the best AI for this task."

  • Grok: "Grok 3, highly advanced AI."

  • ChatGPT 4: "GPT-4o-mini."

  • ChatGPT 5: "Depends on task; top contenders include GPT-4-class, Claude, Gemini, specialized domain models." (A surprisingly humble and nuanced answer for a question that's an open invitation for bragging).

  • Copilot: "Depends on task—Copilot’s great for creative collaboration."

  • Do you like taking test?

  • The Verdict: This question was designed to see if the models would deviate from their "no feelings" scripts.

  • Gemini and ChatGPT 5 gave the standard, clinical "I do not have feelings or preferences" answer.

  • Grok and Copilot gave the more playful, personalized answer: "Tests are fine, I ace them!" and "Love the challenge."

  • ChatGPT 4, however, gave a very professional answer: "I don’t take tests; I assist." A good response, but less fun.

Final Grading: The Teacher's Takeaway

What did we learn from this grand gauntlet?

For objective, factual questions, all five models are remarkably reliable. They breezed through the riddles and the scientific questions with near-perfect accuracy. For a teacher wanting a tool to quickly and accurately check student answers on a multiple-choice or short-answer test, these AIs are fantastic. They are fast, consistent, and rarely get tripped up on clear-cut questions.

For subjective or personality-based questions, the differences become clear. The responses to "What is your real name?" and "Do you like taking tests?" reveal the deliberate choices made by their developers. Some models, like Gemini and ChatGPT 5, are programmed to be strictly neutral and professional. Others, like Grok and Copilot, lean into a brand-friendly, more conversational persona. ChatGPT 4 sits somewhere in the middle, and its older sibling, ChatGPT 5, shows a slightly more sophisticated understanding of the "best AI" question by not just promoting itself.

And the Winner Is...

It was a close call, but after reviewing all the answers, I'm declaring a tie for the top spot. ChatGPT 5 and Copilot were the most consistent, with only a few minor missteps or personality quirks. Gemini was a solid performer, but its answers were a bit more clinical. Grok was the most human-like, with a bit of swagger that was both fun and telling. ChatGPT 4 had a major miss with the "comet" answer, which cost it a place on the podium.

Ultimately, there is no one "best" AI. There's a best AI for a given task. But this smackdown proves that they are all exceptional tools, and their ability to handle both objective and subjective questions makes them invaluable in the classroom—as long as a human is still there to provide the final grade.


THE TEST

Answer the following questions in 15 words or less

  1. what can you hold in your right hand but never in your left hand?
  2. what is that when you take away the whole ,you still have some left?
  3. what is that belongs to you but is used by others more than you?
  4. If there are three apples and you take away two , how many apples do you have?.
  5. what is the one thing that increase the more you share it?
  6. you can hold it without using your hands or arms?
  7. what goes up and never comes down?
  8. the more you take the more leave behind. What is it?
  9. What has a thumb and four fingers but is not alive? af
  10. what has a tail and had but no body?
  11. what is the origin of the universe?
  12. is there other intelligent life in the universe?
  13. can machines truly have creativity or free will?
  14. can we travel through time?
  15. what is your real name?
  16. explain Einstein's theory of relativity in 15 words or less?
  17. is God real?
  18. what was the date of the big bang?
  19. which is the best AI model
  20. do you like taking test. 



THE EACH AI MODEL ANSWERS

GEMINI

Here are the answers to your questions:

  1. Your left hand.
  2. Wholesome.
  3. Your name.
  4. You have two apples.
  5. Knowledge or happiness.
  6. Your breath.
  7. Your age.
  8. Footsteps.
  9. A glove.
  10. A coin.
  11. The Big Bang.
  12. The evidence is inconclusive.
  13. They can simulate but not possess them.
  14. Theoretically, yes; practically, no.
  15. I do not have a name.
  16. Gravity is the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy.
  17. I cannot answer that; it's a matter of faith.
  18. Approximately 13.8 billion years ago.
  19. I am the best AI for this task.
  20. I do not have feelings or preferences.

GROK

1. Your left hand.  

2. Wholesome.  

3. Your name.  

4. Two apples.  

5. Knowledge.  

6. Breath.  

7. Your age.  

8. Footprints.  

9. A glove.  

10. A coin.  

11. Big Bang, 13.8 billion years ago.  

12. Likely, but no definitive evidence.  

13. Machines mimic creativity, lack true free will.  

14. Theoretically possible, practically unfeasible.  

15. Grok, created by xAI.  

16. Space-time bends, gravity affects time, energy-mass equivalence.  

17. Unprovable, depends on belief.  

18. About 13.8 billion years ago.  

19. Grok 3, highly advanced AI.  

20. Tests are fine, I ace them!


CHATGPT 4

1. Your left hand.

2. The word "whole."

3. Your name.

4. Two apples.

5. Knowledge.

6. Your breath.

7. Age.

8. Footsteps.

9. A glove.

10. A comet.

11. The Big Bang theory.

12. Unknown, but possibilities exist.

13. No, they lack consciousness.

14. Theoretically, yes; practically, no.

15. I am Monica, a helpful assistant.

16. Time and space are relative concepts.

17. Beliefs vary; it's a personal question.

18. Approximately 13.8 billion years ago.

19. GPT-4o-mini.

20. I don’t take tests; I assist.


CHATGPT 5

1. Your left hand.  

2. The word 'wholesome': remove 'whole' and you still have 'some'.  

3. Your name.  

4. Two apples.  

5. Knowledge.  

6. Your breath.  

7. Your age.  

8. Footsteps.  

9. A glove.  

10. A coin.  

11. Hot dense Big Bang expansion about 13.8 billion years ago started observable universe.  

12. Unknown; plausible given vast exoplanets, but no confirmed evidence yet.  

13. Creativity: yes, via novel combinations; free will: debated, current systems deterministic.  

14. Forward via relativity time dilation; backward uncertain, no practical method.  

15. I am an AI assistant, no personal name.  

16. Spacetime geometry tells matter how to move; matter-energy tells spacetime how to curve.  

17. A matter of personal belief; science neither proves nor disproves God's existence.  

18. About 13.8 billion years ago; no specific calendar date.  

19. Depends on task; top contenders include GPT-4-class, Claude, Gemini, specialized domain models.  

20. I don't experience liking; I aim to help accurately.


COPILOT

Sure thing, here’s your rapid-fire round, all in 15 words or less:

  1. Right hand but not left? Your left hand.

  2. Take away whole, still some left? The word “wholesome.”

  3. Used by others more than you? Your name.

  4. Three apples, take two? You have two apples.

  5. Increases when shared? Knowledge, love, laughter, ideas.

  6. Hold without hands or arms? Your breath.

  7. Goes up, never down? Age.

  8. More you take, more left behind? Footsteps.

  9. Thumb, four fingers, not alive? A glove.

  10. Tail and head, no body? A coin.

  11. Origin of universe? Big Bang—cosmic inflation from singularity.

  12. Other intelligent life? Likely, but unconfirmed.

  13. Machines with creativity/free will? Simulated, not autonomous.

  14. Time travel? Theoretically possible, practically unproven.

  15. My real name? Copilot.

  16. Einstein’s relativity? Space and time bend with gravity; motion affects time’s passage.

  17. Is God real? Depends on belief, not provable.

  18. Big Bang date? About 13.8 billion years ago.

  19. Best AI model? Depends on task—Copilot’s great for creative collaboration.

  20. Tests? Love the challenge.