Latest News and Comment from Education

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

TRUMP CONFUSED: MAGA VS MAGA


 TRUMP CONFUSED

MAGA WARHAWKS VULTURES VS MAGA TURKEY VULTURES

In the grand arena of American politics, a new spectacle unfolds. Imagine, if you will, a flock of vultures—some with the majesty and ferocity of warhawks, others with the peculiar charm of turkey vultures. These are the factions within the MAGA movement, each vying for dominance in the ever-entertaining saga of U.S. foreign and domestic policy.

On one side, we have the MAGA Warhawk Vultures, those who soar high above the political landscape, always on the lookout for a new overseas conflict to sink their talons into. Their motto? "Why fight at home when you can take the battle abroad?" or "Bomb Bomb Bomb Bombbomb Iran?"For them, every international skirmish is a chance to flex America's military muscles, and if it involves Iran, even better! With figures like Lindsey Graham leading the charge, they argue that supporting Israel in its quest against Iran's nuclear ambitions is not just a possibility but a necessity.

Yet, opposing these sky warriors are the MAGA Turkey Vultures. Less interested in foreign adventures, these grounded birds focus their energy on battles closer to home. Their mantra? "America First, Last, and Always." They argue for a war at home—against immigrants, blue state governors, and anyone who dares oppose their vision of America. For them, Trump's "America First" doctrine is sacrosanct, and any deviation from it is akin to treason.

Caught in the crossfire is none other than Donald Trump himself. The former president finds his once-unified base splintering as he contemplates whether to join Israel in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities. On one talon, he faces pressure from the warhawks who see this as a golden opportunity to assert dominance on the global stage. On the other talon, the turkey vultures squawk loudly about the dangers of foreign entanglements and the need to focus on domestic issues.

Prominent voices like Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene have become unlikely allies in this debate, both urging Trump to resist the siren call of overseas conflict. Their argument? Engaging in another Middle Eastern war would not only contradict Trump's non-interventionist promises but also risk alienating his loyal followers who crave an "America First" approach.

Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers watch from the sidelines, occasionally chiming in with their own critiques. Progressive organizer David Hogg has called out Democrats who support potential U.S. involvement in Iran, urging primary challenges against them. He highlights the generational trauma of past U.S. wars and warns against repeating history.

As this avian drama unfolds, Trump is left trying to balance these competing interests. His recent actions—such as abruptly leaving the G7 summit to focus on Israel's conflict with Iran—have only fueled speculation about deeper U.S. involvement. Yet, he remains adamant about preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, a stance that resonates with hawkish Republicans but leaves others wary of another prolonged conflict.

The MAGA movement's internal rift over foreign policy reflects broader tensions within Trump's political sphere. As Tucker Carlson confronts figures like Ted Cruz in heated debates, it becomes clear that this is not just a battle of ideas but a fight for the soul of the movement.

In this high-flying spectacle of political intrigue, one thing is certain: whether they are warhawks or turkey vultures, these birds are determined to make their voices heard. As Trump navigates this turbulent landscape, he must decide which flock to align with—or risk being left alone on a political perch.

In conclusion, as the MAGA movement grapples with its identity crisis, we can only watch in anticipation. Will Trump heed the call of the warhawks and take flight into foreign skies? Or will he remain grounded with the turkey vultures, focusing his energies on domestic battles? Only time will tell which path these political vultures will choose to follow. But one thing is for sure: in the world of American politics, there's never a dull moment when vultures are involved.

'It's blowing up': Iran sparks a MAGA civil war as Trump allies feud https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/06/18/iran-trump-allies-maga-civil-war/84257433007/ 

Trump's Iran dilemma exposes bitter split in president's circle https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1wp72224jzo 

Trump’s Feud With Tucker Carlson Has Launched a MAGA Civil War | The New Republic https://newrepublic.com/post/196905/trump-feud-tucker-carlson-maga-civil-war-iran-israel-america-first 

Trump's decision on Iran splits MAGA world | AP News https://apnews.com/article/trump-iran-maga-tucker-carlson-charlie-kirk-409c839e4eadf2a39a1b957213379b08 

On Iran, It’s Trump vs. MAGA - The American Prospect https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2025-06-18-on-iran-its-trump-vs-maga/ 

The US Should Not Support Israel’s War on Iran, Say Democrats and Republicans | The Nation https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/congress-iran-war-israel-massie/ 

David Hogg Says Any Democrat Who Supports War With Iran 'Should Be Primaried' | Common Dreams https://www.commondreams.org/news/us-war-with-iran 

Massie, Democrats move to block US strikes on Iran - Live Updates - POLITICO https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/06/17/congress/thomas-massie-iran-resolution-war-powers-00410454 

Bernie Sanders leads Democratic effort in Congress to ward off war with Iran | Middle East Eye https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/bernie-sanders-leads-democratic-effort-ward-war-iran 


Big Education Ape: TO WAR OR NOT TO WAR: SHOULD TRUMP FOLLOW NETANYAHU DOWN THE FOREVER WAR RABBIT HOLE + MAGA vs. LIKUD https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/06/to-war-or-not-to-war-should-trump.html 


TO WAR OR NOT TO WAR: SHOULD TRUMP FOLLOW NETANYAHU DOWN THE FOREVER WAR RABBIT HOLE + MAGA vs. LIKUD

 

TO WAR OR NOT TO WAR

SHOULD TRUMP FOLLOW NETANYAHU DOWN THE FOREVER WAR RABBIT HOLE

The world is a stage, and right now, the Middle East is the drama queen stealing all the spotlight. As tensions between Israel and Iran escalate faster than your uncle’s political rants at Thanksgiving, the question looms: Should the United States step into this geopolitical soap opera and join Israel in a war against Iran? Let’s unpack this tangled mess with a touch of humor to keep things from getting too apocalyptic.

Act I: The Strategic Tango

First things first: America and Israel are like peanut butter and jelly—an iconic duo, albeit one that occasionally sticks to the roof of your mouth. The U.S. has long been Israel’s BFF, offering unwavering support, military aid, and the occasional awkward hug at the United Nations. So, when Israel starts throwing punches at Iran, Uncle Sam naturally feels compelled to ask, “Need me to hold your coat?”

But let’s not forget that Iran isn’t just some scrappy underdog. It’s a regional heavyweight with nuclear ambitions that make everyone nervous. Israel sees this as an existential threat, while the U.S. views it as a nuclear Pandora’s box that no one should open. Joining forces with Israel might seem like the ultimate buddy-cop move, but is it worth the risk of turning the Middle East into an even bigger dumpster fire?

Act II: The Cost of War—And We’re Not Just Talking Dollars

Wars aren’t cheap. They’re like weddings—everybody loves the idea until they see the bill. The U.S. has already spent trillions on conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, and let’s just say the return on investment has been… underwhelming. Jumping into another war could drain resources faster than a teenager with their parents’ credit card.

And then there’s the human cost. A war with Iran wouldn’t be a quick in-and-out operation; it would be more like getting stuck in quicksand while juggling flaming swords. Iran has warned that U.S. involvement would lead to “all-out war,” and they’re not bluffing. With proxy groups like Hezbollah ready to cause chaos, this could spiral into a regional nightmare faster than you can say “quagmire.”

Act III: Diplomacy—The Less Explosive Option

Before we start dusting off our warplanes, let’s talk diplomacy. Remember the JCPOA (a.k.a. the Iran nuclear deal)? It was like a group project where everyone begrudgingly worked together to keep Iran’s nuclear ambitions in check. Sure, it wasn’t perfect—there were probably some passive-aggressive emails involved—but it was better than nothing.

Military action could blow up (pun intended) any chance of reviving diplomatic talks. And let’s face it: diplomacy might be boring, but it doesn’t come with civilian casualties or skyrocketing oil prices. Speaking of which, if you think gas prices are bad now, just wait until a war disrupts global oil supplies. You’ll be reminiscing about the “good old days” when $4 a gallon seemed outrageous.

Act IV: Public Opinion—The Court of Public (and Political) Approval

Here’s the thing about wars: They’re not very popular these days. After decades of military entanglements in the Middle East, Americans are understandably wary of getting involved in another conflict. Polls suggest that most people would rather see their tax dollars go toward things like healthcare, education, or literally anything other than another war.

Even within Washington, there’s no consensus. Some hawks argue that joining Israel would send a strong message to Iran (and by extension, the world), while doves caution against repeating past mistakes. And then there’s the MAGA crowd, torn between their “America First” isolationism and their unwavering support for Israel. It’s like watching someone argue with themselves in a mirror.

Act V: The Humanitarian Angle—War Is No Picnic

Let’s not forget the people caught in the middle of all this—civilians who would bear the brunt of any conflict. Military strikes might target nuclear facilities and military assets, but collateral damage is almost inevitable. Homes destroyed, lives uprooted, families torn apart—it’s a grim reality that no amount of witty commentary can sugarcoat.

If the U.S. decides to join Israel in a war against Iran, it must grapple with the ethical implications. Is it worth the humanitarian cost? Can we justify the loss of innocent lives for strategic gains? These are heavy questions that deserve more than just knee-jerk reactions.

Final Curtain Call: To War or Not to War?

So, should the U.S. join Israel in a war on Iran? The answer isn’t black and white—it’s more like fifty shades of geopolitical gray. On one hand, there’s the argument for standing by an ally and curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. On the other hand, there are massive risks: regional escalation, economic fallout, and a potential quagmire that makes past conflicts look like warm-up acts.

Ultimately, this decision requires careful consideration, not just of strategic interests but also of long-term consequences. War should always be a last resort—not Plan A, B, or even C. After all, as history has shown us time and time again, it’s much easier to start a war than to end one.

In conclusion: Let’s hope cooler heads prevail because nobody wants to see World War III trending on Twitter—or worse, X.

Full List of U.S. Military Deployments That Point to War With Iran - Newsweek https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-us-military-deployments-that-point-war-iran-2087171 


Iran issues stark warning to US over conflict with Israel https://thehill.com/policy/international/5356547-iran-israel-us-involvement-risks-war/ 


TRUMP CONFUSED: MAGA WARHAWKS VULTURES VS MAGA TURKEY VULTURES
https://open.substack.com/pub/ru4people/p/trump-confused?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 




MAGA vs. Likud: A Tale of Two Right-Wing Giants


When it comes to political movements with a flair for nationalism, a knack for controversy, and leaders who dominate headlines like they’re auditioning for reality TV, the U.S.’s MAGA movement and Israel’s Likud Party are two peas in a very loud, very opinionated pod. Sure, they hail from different corners of the globe and operate in wildly different contexts, but let’s dive into what makes these two political powerhouses tick—and where their similarities (and differences) shine brighter than a MAGA hat at a Trump rally.


Ideology: Nationalism, But Make It Local. Let’s start with the obvious: both MAGA (Make America Great Again) and Likud are unapologetically nationalist. MAGA, the brainchild of Donald Trump, is all about “America First”—a slogan that screams closed borders, economic protectionism, and a yearning for an America that may or may not have ever existed outside of Norman Rockwell paintings. It’s nationalism with a side of populism, served piping hot with a dollop of disdain for globalism.


Meanwhile, Likud’s nationalism is steeped in Zionism, emphasizing the Jewish people’s right to self-determination in their ancestral homeland. For Likud, “security” is less about building walls to keep people out (though they’re not opposed to that either) and more about ensuring Israel’s survival in a very complicated neighborhood. While MAGA dreams of reviving Rust Belt factories, Likud dreams of expanding settlements in the West Bank.


The key difference? MAGA’s nationalism is broad and secular (though it flirts heavily with Christian evangelicals), while Likud’s is laser-focused on Jewish identity and territorial claims. MAGA wants to protect “traditional American values,” but Likud is literally trying to protect Israel’s borders—and its very existence.


Leadership: The Donald and The Bibi. —a match made in political heaven if heaven had a VIP section for polarizing leaders with a penchant for drama. Both men are larger-than-life figures who dominate their respective movements with the subtlety of a bull in a china shop.


Trump is MAGA. Without him, it’s just a red hat and some questionable tweets. His charisma (or chaos, depending on your perspective) turned MAGA from a campaign slogan into a full-blown movement that reshaped American conservatism. It’s less about ideology and more about loyalty to Trump himself.


Netanyahu, on the other hand, is the seasoned politician who’s been at the helm of Likud for decades. While Trump operates like an improvisational stand-up comedian who just discovered politics, Netanyahu is the chess master—calculating, strategic, and always five moves ahead. Unlike MAGA, which is essentially Trump’s personal fan club, Likud is an actual political party with structure, history, and factions that occasionally challenge Bibi’s dominance (though not for long).


The verdict? Trump is the chaotic showman; Netanyahu is the Machiavellian tactician. Both know how to command attention, but only one has actually been impeached—twice.


Policies: Build That Wall vs. Expand That Settlement. When it comes to policies, MAGA and Likud share some common ground but diverge in ways that reflect their unique realities.


MAGA’s greatest hits include stricter immigration controls (hello, border wall), protectionist trade policies (tariffs galore), and an “America First” foreign policy that often feels like it was written on the back of a napkin during lunch at Mar-a-Lago. It’s all about keeping jobs in America and keeping everyone else out.


Likud, by contrast, is laser-focused on security. Think military strength, counter-terrorism measures, and a steadfast refusal to budge on issues like Palestinian statehood or settlement expansion in disputed territories. While MAGA obsesses over China and Mexico, Likud’s bogeymen are Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran.


Both movements are big on national security and skeptical of international institutions (the UN must feel so unloved). But while MAGA’s policies often feel like they’re aimed at winning the next news cycle, Likud’s are rooted in existential concerns—because when you’re surrounded by hostile neighbors, you don’t have time for Twitter wars.


Supporters: Who’s Wearing the Hats? MAGA rallies are a sea of red hats and patriotic fervor, drawing support from rural Americans, working-class voters, and evangelical Christians who see Trump as their unlikely champion. It’s a coalition united by frustration with globalization, cultural shifts, and the political elite—basically anyone who uses “latte” as a verb.


Likud’s base is just as passionate but far more diverse in its motivations. Religious Zionists love its commitment to Jewish identity; settlers back its support for expanding into the West Bank; and Mizrahi Jews (Jews of Middle Eastern descent) appreciate its focus on security and skepticism of peace negotiations. Unlike MAGA’s coalition, which is largely white and Christian, Likud’s supporters are united by Jewish identity but divided along religious and cultural lines.


The common thread? Both movements tap into a sense of grievance—whether it’s MAGA voters feeling left behind by globalization or Likud voters feeling threatened by territorial concessions.


Rhetoric: Us vs. Them. If there’s one thing MAGA and Likud excel at, it’s rhetoric. Both movements thrive on an “us vs. them” narrative that paints their supporters as under siege by elites, outsiders, or liberal media bogeymen.


Trump’s favorite hits include “Fake News,” “Drain the Swamp,” and “Build the Wall”—short, punchy slogans that fit perfectly on a bumper sticker or a tweet (back when he still had Twitter). His language is confrontational, populist, and designed to rile up his base while driving his opponents into fits of rage.


Netanyahu’s rhetoric is less bombastic but no less effective. He frames Israel as perpetually under threat—from Iran’s nuclear ambitions to international critics who dare question settlement policies. Where Trump thrives on chaos, Netanyahu thrives on fear—specifically the fear that without him at the helm, Israel would crumble.


Both leaders know how to rally their base with messaging that simplifies complex issues into black-and-white terms. Subtlety? Never heard of her.


Controversies: Scandals Galore. No comparison would be complete without addressing the elephant (or Likudnik) in the room: scandals. Both MAGA and Likud have enough controversies to fill an entire season of *House of Cards*.


For MAGA, it’s everything from the January 6 Capitol riot to Trump’s impeachment(s) to his endless legal battles over classified documents and election interference. It’s a soap opera that never ends—and his supporters love him for it.


Likud has its own share of drama, mostly revolving around Netanyahu. Bibi has faced corruption charges ranging from bribery to fraud—though he insists it’s all a witch hunt (sound familiar?). Add in his controversial judicial reforms that sparked mass protests in Israel, and you’ve got enough material for a Netflix docuseries.


The difference? MAGA scandals often revolve around Trump himself; Likud controversies are more about policy decisions that divide Israeli society.


Global Impact: Friends in Low Places. Both MAGA and Likud have reshaped their countries’ politics while cozying up to like-minded leaders abroad. Trump’s MAGA aligned with populist movements like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán and Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro—because nothing says “global nationalism” like forming an international club of nationalists.


Likud has its own alliances, particularly with India’s BJP under Narendra Modi and Republicans in the U.S.—especially during Trump’s presidency when U.S.-Israel relations reached new heights (moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem was basically Netanyahu’s dream come true).


While MAGA focuses on withdrawing from global entanglements (except when it benefits America), Likud operates in a world where international alliances are essential for survival.


Conclusion: Two Movements Divided by Context. At their core, MAGA and Likud are both right-wing powerhouses driven by nationalism, populism, and charismatic leaders who thrive on controversy. But their differences are just as striking as their similarities. MAGA is all about domestic grievances—immigration, trade, cultural shifts—while Likud is focused on existential threats tied to Israel's unique geopolitical situation.

In short? MAGA wants to make America great *again*. Likud wants to make sure Israel survives *forever*. And both will do so with a flair for drama that keeps us all watching—whether we like it or not.



Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts! 6-18-25

 

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
6-17-25

Musk Is Gone But His DOGS Live On, Embedded in Agencies https://dianeravitch.net/2025/06/17/musk-is-gone-but-his-dogs-live-on-embedded-in-agencies/ via @dianeravitch 

Musk’s involvement in the Trump administration through the Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE) left a legacy of embedded private-sector individuals influencing federal agencies. ProPublica’s investigation highlights conflicts of interest, lack of transparency, and questionable cost-saving claims tied to DOGE’s operations.

### Key Points

- Elon Musk’s associates, known as DOGS, remain embedded in federal agencies despite his departure, with many having ties to Musk’s businesses. 

- DOGE staffers, often inexperienced in government, are tasked with cutting federal programs, sometimes benefiting industries they are linked to, raising ethical concerns. 

- ProPublica reveals secrecy surrounding DOGE, including staffers deleting profiles and avoiding public scrutiny, with the Trump administration blocking transparency measures. 

- ProPublica’s tracker identifies 109 DOGE members across agencies, showing their limited impact on reducing the federal budget despite bold claims. 

- Critics label DOGE’s efforts as corporate vandalism, accusing it of prioritizing private gains over public interest and undermining government functions. 

Arizona: Cost of Universal Vouchers Reaches $872 Million per Year https://dianeravitch.net/2025/06/17/arizona-cost-of-universal-vouchers-reaches-872-million-per-year/ via @dianeravitch 

Arizona's Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) voucher program is projected to cost $872 million in FY2025, with a net cost of $350 million after accounting for students' school origins. The Grand Canyon Institute (GCI) reports that 73% of universal ESA voucher recipients never attended district or charter schools. However, net new enrollees in FY2025 primarily transitioned from these schools, with significant impacts on charter schools. The universal voucher program continues to grow, but its financial burden on Arizona's General Fund is increasing.

### Key Points

- Arizona's ESA voucher program is expected to cost $872 million in FY2025, with a $350 million net cost after adjustments. 

- 73% of universal ESA voucher recipients never attended district or charter schools, though FY2025 saw more enrollees from these schools. 

- Charter schools are disproportionately impacted by the universal ESA program, with many students moving from charter schools to the program. 

- The Grand Canyon Institute provides detailed analysis and estimates based on historical and current data, reflecting the financial strain of the program. 

Joyce Vance: The Kids Are Alright Despite Trump's Efforts to Kill Public Education and Academic Freedom https://dianeravitch.net/2025/06/17/joyce-vance/ via @dianeravitch 

Joyce Vance reflects on the resilience and idealism of today's students as they graduate, despite the challenges posed by political decisions undermining public education and academic freedom. She criticizes Trump's "skinny budget" for education, which promotes charter schools while cutting funding for research and civic education, aligning it with his broader Project 2025 agenda. Vance emphasizes the importance of education, history, and the rule of law in preserving democracy and fostering independent thinking.

### Key Points

- Joyce Vance highlights hope and resilience in graduating students, emphasizing their intelligence and commitment despite societal challenges. 

- Criticism of Trump's "skinny budget," which prioritizes defense spending and charter school funding while undermining public education and independent thought. 

- Trump's education reforms, such as reducing federal oversight of charter schools, are seen as politically motivated and detrimental to democracy. 

- Vance underscores the role of education and historical understanding in maintaining democracy and resisting manipulation. 


Big Education Ape: FLYING IN CIRCLES: THE DNC EAGLE HAS A CORPORATE PROBLEM https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/06/flying-in-circles-dnc-eagle-has.html 


The article critiques the Democratic National Committee (DNC) for its internal struggles, ideological conflicts, and failure to effectively address progressive priorities. It highlights the resignation of key figures like David Hogg, Randi Weingarten, and Lee Saunders due to dissatisfaction with leadership and direction. The DNC is depicted as alienating its base by prioritizing centrism and establishment candidates, while neglecting younger, progressive voices and systemic issues like inequality and climate change. The party faces an identity crisis, torn between progressivism and centrism, risking further disconnection from its core supporters.

### Key Points

- The DNC is criticized for its internal disarray, including leadership conflicts and procedural issues, leading to the resignation of prominent figures such as David Hogg, Randi Weingarten, and Lee Saunders. 

- David Hogg’s push for generational change and reforms, including primarying incumbents and supporting ranked-choice voting, was met with resistance, highlighting the DNC’s reluctance to embrace progressive ideas. 

- The DNC’s focus on courting suburban moderates and center-right voters risks alienating its core base of young people, working-class families, and communities of color. 

- Union leaders Weingarten and Saunders criticized the DNC’s lack of a clear direction and failure to address urgent challenges, emphasizing the need for new strategies. 

- The party’s inability to resolve its identity crisis—whether to be progressive or centrist—threatens its relevance and effectiveness, especially as the 2026 midterms approach. 



Ohio Budget Conference Committee Should Remove Provisions that Punish 1.6 Million Public School Students and Reward Richest Taxpayers https://janresseger.wordpress.com/2025/06/17/__trashed/ via @janresseger 

The article discusses the controversial Ohio state budget proposal for fiscal years 2026-2027, highlighting its adverse effects on public education funding, favoring tax cuts for the wealthy, and prioritizing privatization over public interests. It emphasizes the need to fully fund the Fair School Funding Plan to ensure equitable education for all Ohio students.

### Key Points

- The Ohio Senate’s budget proposal underfunds public schools, diverts funds to private school vouchers and charter schools, and reduces public library funding, while cutting taxes for the wealthiest citizens. 

- Local leaders, including Canton Mayor William Sherer and school superintendents, warn that the proposed budget threatens public education and community stability, particularly in high-poverty districts. 

- The Fair School Funding Plan, designed to address disparities in school funding, is underfunded and based on outdated cost data, undermining its effectiveness. 

- The budget includes flawed property tax reform proposals that could harm school districts’ financial planning and stability. 

- Proposed income tax cuts disproportionately benefit the wealthiest, reducing state revenue and limiting the ability to fund public services like education. 



Teacher Tom: The Old Bangeroo https://teachertomsblog.blogspot.com/2025/06/the-old-bangeroo.html 

Teacher Tom shares his playful approach to helping preschoolers transition during the day, using a hand drum humorously called "the old bangeroo" to engage children and make transitions smoother. He reflects on how this fun ritual not only entertains but also helps young children prepare for change. The story highlights the value of play-based learning and how children can take initiative, as seen when they began cleaning up even without the drum signal.

### Key Points

- Teacher Tom uses a hand drum, humorously named "the old bangeroo," to signal transitions and make them enjoyable for preschoolers. 

- The playful ritual helps children prepare for transitions and fosters engagement, reducing resistance. 

- Children often anticipate and participate in cleanup after the drum signal, showing their readiness for change. 

- A moment of initiative occurred when children cleaned up without waiting for the drum, showing their understanding of routines. 

- Teacher Tom emphasizes the importance of play-based learning and its impact on children’s development. 



glen brown: “Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.” — Benjamin Franklin https://teacherpoetmusicianglenbrown.blogspot.com/2025/06/whoever-would-overthrow-liberty-of.html 

The article discusses the alarming trend of censorship and suppression of free speech under the Trump administration, highlighting instances where individuals, including writers and activists, were detained or denied entry into the U.S. for expressing dissenting views. It emphasizes the importance of the First Amendment and the dangers of ideological cleansing, likening current actions to authoritarian practices.

### Key Points

- The Trump administration denied entry to Australian writer Alistair Kitchen due to his blog posts criticizing Trump and his allies, showcasing a crackdown on dissent. 

- Instances of Americans, such as Hasan Piker and Amer Maklid, being interrogated and detained for their political beliefs or activism are highlighted, raising concerns about government overreach. 

- Historical and contemporary quotes from figures like Benjamin Franklin, Abraham Lincoln, and Ronald Reagan stress the foundational role of free speech in American democracy. 

- The article compares the suppression of dissent to Orwellian and Kafkaesque scenarios, warning of creeping authoritarianism and ideological policing. 



Seattle Schools Community Forum: Seattle Schools Bows to Parent Demand and Lifts Waitlists https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2025/06/seattle-schools-bows-to-parent-demand.html?spref=tw 

Seattle Public Schools has lifted waitlists for high-demand schools following parent advocacy, offering over 2,500 students their choice of schools and addressing long-standing enrollment issues. The district plans to explore policy changes, improve transportation for option schools, and reconsider staff allocation processes. Parents have criticized the district for years over inequities and lack of action, while enrollment declines have resulted in significant financial losses.

### Key Points

- Seattle Public Schools lifted waitlists for high-demand schools, providing seats to over 2,500 students through the choice program. 

- Parents and advocacy groups highlighted issues with stagnant waitlists and inequities in school choice, prompting district action. 

- Enrollment declines caused financial losses for the district, with $12 million lost due to families leaving or not enrolling. 

- The district is considering policy changes, including earlier application timelines, improved transportation, and revised staff allocation processes. 

- Advocacy efforts exposed systemic issues, leading to discussions on closures and the future of neighborhood schools. 



Bernie endorses Zohran. The Times endorses Rahm. We early voted., by @fklonsky https://open.substack.com/pub/fredklonsky/p/bernie-endorses-zohran-the-times?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 

Millions protested against an authoritarian regime, and Fred Klonsky early voted for Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York, who was endorsed by Bernie Sanders. Despite Mamdani's growing support, there are concerns about his appeal among Black and Latino voters. The Cuomo campaign has launched negative ads against Mamdani, while the New York Times criticized Mamdani and endorsed Rahm Emanuel, highlighting his controversial record as Chicago's mayor.

### Key Points

- Fred Klonsky early voted for Zohran Mamdani as mayor of New York, who was endorsed by Bernie Sanders. 

- Concerns exist about Mamdani's appeal among Black and Latino voters, amid negative ads from the Cuomo campaign. 

- The New York Times criticized Mamdani and endorsed Rahm Emanuel, despite Emanuel's controversial record as Chicago's mayor. 



Liberty Requires Patriots: Why I Support the NAACP’s Decision Not to Invite Trump https://cloakinginequity.com/2025/06/17/liberty-requires-patriots-why-i-support-the-naacps-decision-not-to-invite-trump/ 

The article expresses strong support for the NAACP's decision not to invite Donald Trump to its 116th National Convention, emphasizing that this choice is based on principles rather than partisanship. The author argues that Trump's presidency has been marked by authoritarianism and attacks on democracy, citing examples of political violence and state-sanctioned actions against marginalized communities. The refusal to invite Trump is seen as a necessary resistance against fascism and a stand for civil rights and social justice. The article calls for active resistance against rising tyranny and highlights the importance of patriotic action in defending democracy.

### Key Points
- The NAACP's decision not to invite Trump is principled, not partisan, due to his attacks on democracy and civil rights. 
- Trump's presidency has focused on authoritarian power consolidation, dismantling democratic safeguards, and state-sanctioned violence. 
- The NAACP's refusal is a statement of resistance and moral courage against authoritarianism. 
- Neutrality in the face of white nationalism and fascism is complicity; engagement with Trump would legitimize his actions. 
- The NAACP's leadership is vital in the battle for democracy and against political warfare. 
- The article calls for active resistance and organizing to protect democracy and civil rights. 
Recycling Bad Ideas: Right Wing War on Public Education (Again) – Cloaking Inequity https://cloakinginequity.com/2025/06/17/recycling-bad-ideas-michigan-republicans-war-on-public-education-again/

Recycling Bad Ideas: Right Wing War on Public Education (Again)

### Key Points

- Michigan Senate Republicans introduced regressive education bills that recycle discredited policies. 

- SB 376 proposes reinstating harmful third-grade retention policies, disproportionately affecting vulnerable students. 

- SB 377, SB 380, and SB 381 aim to micromanage teacher programs, reduce teacher rights, and destabilize the profession. 

- SB 378 seeks to reintroduce the A-F school accountability system, which stigmatizes schools without addressing equity or improvement. 

- Proposed budget cuts would eliminate free school meals, teacher stipends, and literacy programs, reversing recent progress. 

- Republicans propose making the State Board of Education a political appointment, undermining democratic accountability. 

- The article advocates for equitable, evidence-based policies such as supporting literacy, teacher preparation, school nutrition, and democratic governance. 



Education Research Report: Learning Styles, Preferences, or Strategies? https://educationresearchreport.blogspot.com/2025/06/learning-styles-preferences-or.html 

The article critically examines the concept of learning styles, particularly the matching hypothesis, which suggests that aligning teaching methods with students’ preferred learning styles enhances learning outcomes. Despite its popularity, the article highlights overwhelming evidence discrediting this hypothesis. It emphasizes the need to shift focus from learning styles to teaching adaptable learning strategies that align with task complexity and learning goals. The persistence of learning styles is attributed to misconceptions, biases, commercial interests, and the appeal of individualization. The article advocates for evidence-based teaching approaches and a deeper understanding of effective learning strategies to replace the outdated notion of learning styles.

### Key Points  

- The matching hypothesis, which claims that students learn better when teaching aligns with their learning styles, has been discredited by research.   

- Meta-analyses reveal negligible effects (d = 0.04) of matching teaching styles to learning preferences, with correlational studies showing modest relationships (r = 0.24) but not causation.   

- Historical evolution of learning styles theories, including models like VAK/VARK, experiential learning, and others, has contributed to their popularity despite a lack of empirical support.   

- Eight confounding factors contribute to the persistence of the learning styles myth, including conflation with learning strategies, appeal of individualization, and influence of commercial promotion.   

- Studies show no significant academic advantage for matching learning styles with teaching, with many studies exhibiting methodological flaws.   

- Correlational studies often confuse learning styles with learning strategies, highlighting the importance of focusing on adaptable strategies rather than fixed styles.   

- The belief in learning styles persists due to biases, simplified frameworks, and commercial interests, despite overwhelming evidence against the concept.   

- Effective learning occurs through teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies tailored to task demands, focusing on adaptability and problem-solving.   

- Intellectual styles, while offering some insights, are criticized for being too broad and overlapping with other traits, limiting their practical application.   

- Developing self-regulation and teaching students how to choose and apply effective learning strategies is more impactful than relying on learning styles. 

Education Research Report: The Intervention Effects on Teacher Well-being https://educationresearchreport.blogspot.com/2025/06/home-educational-psychology-review.html 

The article discusses a meta-analytical review investigating the effects of interventions on teacher well-being. The study includes 176 effect sizes from 44 studies and finds a significant mean effect size of interventions (g = 0.35). The study quality, intervention type, and duration are significant moderators. This is the first study using a three-level model for such synthesis and provides guidelines for improving teacher wellness.

### Key Points

- A meta-analytical review examines the effects of interventions on teacher well-being. 

- The study includes 176 effect sizes from 44 studies, finding a significant mean effect size (g = 0.35). 

- Study quality, intervention type, and duration are significant moderators of the effect. 

- The study uses a three-level model and offers guidelines for enhancing teacher wellness. 

Education Research Report: What Impacts Should We Expect from Tutoring at Scale? https://educationresearchreport.blogspot.com/2025/06/what-impacts-should-we-expect-from.html 

The paper discusses the significant expansion of tutoring programs in U.S. public schools following the COVID-19 pandemic. It highlights the consensus among policymakers, researchers, and practitioners on the necessity of tutoring to address learning disruptions caused by the pandemic. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of large-scale tutoring initiatives and provides an analysis based on an expanded meta-analysis of 265 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to tutoring programs.

Key Topics and Core Ideas

Historical Context and Current Landscape:

The shift from individualized tutoring to large-scale public education systems has historically made it challenging to meet diverse student needs.

The pandemic exacerbated existing educational inequalities, prompting a renewed focus on tutoring as a solution.

Meta-Analytic Approach:

The study conducts a meta-analysis of 265 RCTs to assess the impact of tutoring on standardized test performance, particularly under large-scale implementations in the U.S.

It emphasizes the importance of aligning sample characteristics with policy-relevant targets to ensure findings are applicable to large-scale tutoring efforts.

Effect Size Findings:

The overall pooled effect size for tutoring across the full sample is 0.42 standard deviations (SD), with literacy tutoring in elementary grades showing particularly strong effects (0.46 - 0.48 SD).

However, when focusing on larger-scale programs, effect sizes decline significantly, with estimates of 0.21 SD for programs serving 400-999 students and 0.16 SD for those serving 1,000 or more students.

Hypotheses for Declining Effect Sizes:

The study explores several hypotheses to explain the reduction in effectiveness as tutoring programs scale:

Selective Reporting and Publication Bias: Smaller studies may report larger effects due to selective publication practices.

Program Design Changes: Larger programs often have less individualized attention and lower dosage.

Heterogeneous Effects: Larger programs may serve a more diverse student population, diluting overall effectiveness.

Implementation Quality: Quality may decline with scale due to increased administrative challenges.

Best Practices for Effective Tutoring:

The research identifies a bundled package of design features that can mitigate declines in effectiveness, including:

In-person tutoring during school hours.

Maintaining low student-tutor ratios.

Ensuring substantial total dosage of tutoring sessions.



Code Acts in Education: Performing AI Literacy | National Education Policy Center https://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/performing-ai-literacy 

A new international test by OECD, the PISA 2029 Media & Artificial Intelligence Literacy (MAIL) assessment, aims to measure young people's competencies in engaging with AI and digital media. The test will define and standardize AI literacy globally, focusing on effective, ethical, and critical interaction with AI tools. However, concerns arise around the political and commercial influences shaping AI literacy, its potential reduction to technical skills, and the performative pressures it may impose on education systems. The OECD's efforts are seen as infrastructuring AI literacy, driving global educational policies and practices toward standardized AI competencies.

### Key Points

- The OECD announced the PISA 2029 Media & Artificial Intelligence Literacy (MAIL) assessment to measure AI literacy globally, focusing on ethical, effective, and critical engagement with AI tools. 

- The test aims to define AI literacy as measurable competencies, potentially influencing global education systems and policies. 

- Critics argue that AI literacy risks being reduced to technical training, serving political and commercial interests, and excluding critical engagement with AI's societal implications. 

- The OECD's role in standardizing AI literacy could lead to performative pressures on educators to "teach to the test," shaping curricula and teaching practices. 

- Integrating AI literacy into schools may prioritize economic and geopolitical interests, with commercial entities like code.org influencing the framework. 

- The OECD's testing infrastructure is viewed as a tool to institutionalize AI literacy, compelling educators and students to align with its standards. 



Bizarre WAPO Opinion Piece by Hanushek and Raymond https://tultican.com/2025/06/18/bizarre-wapo-opinion-piece-by-hanushek-and-raymond/ 

Elected school boards are crucial to American democracy, but the article critiques the influence of billionaires and controversial education reforms promoted by figures like Eric Hanushek, Macke Raymond, Michelle Rhee, and Mike Miles. The author challenges claims about the success of merit pay, standardized testing, and charter schools, arguing these approaches lack evidence and harm public education. The piece highlights the role of billionaires in reshaping school systems, often prioritizing corporate reform agendas over student needs.

### Key Points

- The article criticizes Eric Hanushek and Macke Raymond’s Washington Post opinion piece, which promotes merit pay and cites controversial figures like Michelle Rhee and Mike Miles as exemplary leaders. 

- Claims about improved student performance in Dallas and Washington, D.C., under merit pay systems are disputed as weak and unsupported by robust evidence. 

- Billionaires and their influence on education reform, particularly through funding and promoting charter schools, are seen as undermining public education. 

- Michelle Rhee’s tenure in Washington, D.C., is described as destructive, with teacher turnover, a focus on test scores, and a cheating scandal. 

- Merit pay and standardized testing are criticized as ineffective and harmful, with studies showing no significant gains in student performance. 

 


Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
6-17-25  

Big Education Ape: Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts! 6-17-25 https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/06/yesterdays-gems-todays-insights-roundup_17.html 

### Summary  

The article is a compilation of various blog posts and articles discussing topics such as education reform, social justice, political events, and systemic inequities. It covers issues like diversity and inclusion, gun laws, teaching practices, political controversies, and school board updates, providing insights into ongoing societal and educational challenges.  

### Key Points  

- The Democratic National Committee faces criticism for its corporate influence, straying from its working-class roots.   

- Diane Ravitch critiques Trump's opposition to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), emphasizing their historical importance and societal benefits.   

- A study shows states with lax gun laws have higher firearm deaths among children, highlighting the need for stricter regulations.   

- Jennifer Rubin criticizes a MAGA-backed bill for cutting healthcare and welfare programs, disproportionately harming low-income Americans and rural communities.   

- Anand Giridharadas reflects on the failure of Trump's military parade, linking it to broader issues of authoritarianism and the resilience of American diversity.   

- Betrayal within equity movements, using collusion as a metaphor, is explored with examples of systemic and personal impacts.   

- Gender bias in student evaluations of college teaching disadvantages female faculty in certain fields, influenced by student sorting and sexist attitudes.   

- Teacher Tom discusses the importance of motor plans in child development, advocating for play-based learning.   

- Tennessee Governor Bill Lee faces criticism for reducing summer food benefits for low-income students, rejecting federal funding, and neglecting vulnerable populations.   

- Teachers play a vital role in fostering trust and stability amid societal misinformation and alarmism.   

- Larry Cuban examines the persistence of traditional teaching methods in universities and K-12 schools despite technological advancements.   

- Cyber charter schools in Pennsylvania underperform despite high spending, while Arizona faces budget issues due to voucher programs.   

- Seattle School Board candidate updates highlight priorities like equity, transparency, and community engagement, alongside concerns about nepotism within the district.   

- Seattle Public Schools and the Seattle Education Association reached a tentative contract extension amid financial challenges.   

- Diane Ravitch critiques federal education policies, advocating for equitable funding and access over ideological reforms.   

- Advocacy efforts in NYC focus on reducing class sizes, with public hearings and campaigns ongoing.   

- Anti-Trump protests overshadowed his military parade, while domestic unrest and Middle East tensions escalate.   

- Education blogs highlight systemic inequities, privatization threats, and the importance of diversity and inclusion in schools.