Latest News and Comment from Education

Show All

Thursday, July 23, 2026

THE VANISHING ACT: HOW AMERICA'S HISTORY GETS THE SELECTIVE MEMORY TREATMENT(AGAIN)


THE VANISHING ACT

HOW AMERICA'S HISTORY GETS THE SELECTIVE MEMORY TREATMENT(AGAIN)

When "Heritage" Means Forgetting Half the People Who Built It

There's an old magician's trick where you make something disappear right in front of the audience's eyes. The secret? Misdirection. Get everyone looking at the shiny object in your right hand while your left hand does the real work. American history education has been performing this trick for generations—and the Trump 2.0 administration just brought back the classic routine.

The Curriculum That Dare Not Speak Its Name

Welcome to 2026, where teaching actual American history has become a federal offense—well, not technically, but close enough. The strategy is elegantly simple: You don't need to ban ethnic studies when you can just harass, defund, and sue it into oblivion. It's like saying you're not against ice cream, you're just eliminating all freezers, taxing dairy farms, and investigating anyone who says "sundae" for promoting "divisive desserts."

The Trump administration has weaponized the phrase "divisive concepts"—which apparently means "anything that makes white people uncomfortable at PTA meetings." Through a cocktail of executive orders with names like "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunities" (translation: "Making Sure History Class Stays Comfortable"), the federal government has essentially turned the Department of Education into the Ministry of Approved Narratives.

The Four Horsemen of the Historical Apocalypse

Here's what gets memory-holed when we return to "traditional" American history:

African American Studies → Reduced to "slavery was bad, MLK had a dream, Obama happened, we're done here." Gone are the inconvenient truths about Reconstruction's promise and betrayal, the Tulsa Race Massacre, redlining, and the fact that the Civil Rights Movement didn't magically end racism in 1968.

Latina/o & Chicana/o Studies → Apparently the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (where the U.S. acquired half of Mexico) is too spicy for the curriculum. Also missing: the farmworkers movement, forced repatriations, and the reality that some families didn't cross the border—the border crossed them.

Asian American & Pacific Islander Studies → The Chinese Exclusion Act, Japanese American internment camps, and the fact that Asian Americans fought for language rights in schools (Lau v. Nichols) are all apparently "divisive." Nothing says "unity" like pretending 23 million Americans don't have a history worth teaching.

Native American/Indigenous Studies → "Manifest Destiny" sounds so much more heroic than "systematic land theft and cultural genocide." Tribal sovereignty, the Indian Removal Act, and ongoing treaty violations? Too complicated. Better to stick with Thanksgiving myths and move on.

The San Francisco Sideshow

In a plot twist worthy of a political thriller, San Francisco—that bastion of progressive values—is now ground zero for the ethnic studies wars. The Friends of Lowell Foundation just sued SFUSD for allegedly sneaking through a new ethnic studies curriculum like a teenager hiding a bad report card.

The lawsuit claims the district:

  • Buried the curriculum approval in a vague agenda item
  • Spent $7 million from arts funding (allegedly illegally)
  • Made materials available for public review only during limited office hours (because who doesn't have time to take off work to review textbooks?)

The delicious irony? This happened after the district's previous ethnic studies curriculum got torched for praising Mao's Red Guards and referring to America as the "so-called United States." Apparently, they went from one extreme (revolutionary cosplay) to another (bureaucratic hide-and-seek).

The Federal Sledgehammer

Meanwhile, the Trump administration is wielding federal power like a particularly aggressive game of Whac-A-Mole:

Executive Order 14173 essentially says: "Certify you're not doing DEI stuff, or lose your federal funding." It's the educational equivalent of "nice grant money you got there; shame if something happened to it."

Title VI Investigations now target any curriculum that discusses "systemic oppression" or "racial capitalism." Because nothing says "civil rights enforcement" like investigating people for teaching about civil rights violations.

English Language Learners? Executive Order 14224 declared English the official language and eliminated the federal requirement for language access plans. The $890 million in Title III funding for English language instruction? Proposed for elimination. The message is clear: Sink or swim, preferably in English.

The "Liberated" vs. "Traditional" False Binary

The administration has created a helpful flowchart:

Traditional Ethnic Studies (teaching historical contributions of diverse groups) = Good, acceptable, won't defund you

"Liberated" Ethnic Studies (examining power structures, systemic inequality, or using words like "colonization") = Bad, divisive, prepare for investigation

It's a distinction without much difference—like saying you support "weather studies" but not if they mention "climate change."

The Heritage Foundation's Greatest Hits

This playbook comes straight from Project 2025, that 900-page love letter to white Christian nationalism. The strategy isn't subtle:

  1. Frame inclusive history as "divisive"
  2. Defund anything that challenges the master narrative
  3. Use federal civil rights laws to prevent teaching about civil rights violations
  4. Wrap it all in the language of "unity" and "merit"

It's the educational equivalent of a doctor removing your appendix and calling it "restoring bodily unity."

The Missing History Hall of Fame

What gets left on the cutting room floor when we return to "traditional" American history?

  • The fact that the GI Bill systematically excluded Black veterans
  • Redlining and how the federal government created segregated housing
  • The Bracero Program and how America imported Mexican labor then deported workers during recessions
  • Vincent Chin's murder and the "slap on the wrist" sentences that sparked Asian American activism
  • The reality that Native American boarding schools operated into the 1970s

These aren't "divisive concepts." They're just... history. The kind that happened. To actual people. On American soil.

The Textbook Cartel

For decades, Texas and California textbook adoption boards functioned as de facto national curriculum committees. Publishers sanitized content to satisfy the largest markets, creating a race to the blandest common denominator. The result? Textbooks that made American history read like a Disney movie: some conflict, lots of progress, everybody learns a lesson, roll credits.

The 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre—where a white mob destroyed a prosperous Black neighborhood, killing hundreds—didn't appear in most textbooks until the 21st century. Not because historians didn't know about it. Because it was inconvenient.

The Unity Paradox

Here's the central irony: The people screaming loudest about "unity" and "not dividing students by race" are the same ones insisting we teach history exclusively through the experiences of one racial group.

Real unity doesn't come from pretending we all had the same experience. It comes from understanding we didn't—and reckoning with why.

Teaching that Japanese Americans were incarcerated during WWII while German Americans weren't doesn't "divide" students. It teaches them about the Constitution, due process, and how fear can override civil liberties. You know, civics.

The Courtroom Tango

The legal battles are heating up:

  • The 4th Circuit blessed federal DEI restrictions, giving agencies broad authority to eliminate "equity-related" grants
  • The Southern District of New York pushed back on arbitrary grant revocations
  • San Francisco parents are suing over curriculum transparency
  • Universities are fighting to maintain programs that train teachers in inclusive pedagogy

It's a jurisdictional mess that will keep lawyers employed for years.

What's Really At Stake

This isn't about "divisive concepts" or "merit-based opportunities." It's about who gets to define America.

The "traditional" narrative says: America was founded on freedom, expanded westward, had some growing pains, fixed them, and became a beacon of democracy.

The complete narrative says: America was founded on Enlightenment ideals and slavery, expanded through Indigenous dispossession, created legal racial hierarchies that took centuries to partially dismantle, and is still working through the consequences.

Both can be true. One is just more honest.

The Students Who Disappear

When you eliminate ethnic studies, you don't just erase history—you erase students. The kid whose great-grandparents were incarcerated at Manzanar. The student whose family lost their home to eminent domain for highway construction that deliberately destroyed Black neighborhoods. The child whose Indigenous language was beaten out of their grandparents at boarding schools.

These students sit in classrooms learning an American history that erases their families' experiences. And we wonder why they disengage.

The Bitter Punchline

The cruelest joke? Many of the "divisive" topics that get banned are actually stories of American ideals working—eventually. The Civil Rights Movement showed that protest and organizing can change unjust laws. Mendez v. Westminster (1947) proved that Mexican American parents could challenge school segregation. The farmworkers movement demonstrated that multiracial coalitions could win labor rights.

These are stories of the Constitution's promises being expanded to include more people. They're patriotic as hell—if you believe America's ideals matter more than its comfort.

Conclusion: The Magician's Reveal

The trick behind "missing history by design" is finally visible. It's not about protecting students from "divisive concepts." It's about protecting a narrative that centers one group's experience as universal and treats everyone else's as optional, supplementary, or—worst of all—divisive.

The Trump administration isn't inventing this playbook. They're just saying the quiet part loud and adding federal enforcement mechanisms.

But here's the thing about disappearing acts: They only work if the audience doesn't know the trick. Once you see how it's done—how histories get erased, curricula get defunded, and "unity" gets weaponized—you can't unsee it.

The question isn't whether ethnic studies is "divisive." The question is whether American history is big enough to include all Americans.

Spoiler alert: It always was. Some people just preferred the edited version.

"Those who control the present, control the past. Those who control the past, control the future." —George Orwell, who apparently wrote the instruction manual for 2026.


SOURCES AND LINKS

Based on the article content and available information, here is a comprehensive list of sources and citations:

Primary Federal Documents

1. Executive Order 14173 - "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity"

2. Executive Order 14224 - "Designating English as the Official Language of the United States"

3. Executive Order 14281 - "Eliminating Disparate Impact Liability"

  • Referenced in federal civil rights enforcement policy changes (2025)
  • Impact on educational institutions and Title VI enforcement

Legal Cases and Lawsuits

4. San Francisco Unified School District Ethnic Studies Lawsuit

5. Federal Court Rulings on DEI Executive Orders

  • 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling (2025-2026) - upheld federal DEI restrictions
  • Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) - American Council of Learned Societies v. McDonald
  • Multiple ongoing federal litigation cases regarding grant revocations

Historical Legal Precedents

6. Lau v. Nichols (1974)

  • U.S. Supreme Court case establishing language access rights for English Language Learners
  • Still binding constitutional precedent despite Executive Order 14224

7. Mendez v. Westminster (1947)

  • Federal case challenging school segregation for Mexican American students
  • Preceded Brown v. Board of Education

Federal Education Programs

8. Title III of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)

  • Annual funding: Approximately $890 million
  • Purpose: English language acquisition and immigrant student support
  • Status: Proposed for elimination in Trump administration budget

9. Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964

  • Federal civil rights law prohibiting discrimination in federally funded programs
  • Current enforcement focus: Investigating "divisive concepts" in curricula

Background Sources on Ethnic Studies

10. Third World Liberation Front Strikes (1968)

  • San Francisco State University and UC Berkeley
  • Origin of modern Ethnic Studies programs in U.S. higher education

11. California Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum

  • State-mandated high school graduation requirement
  • Four foundational disciplines: African American, Latina/o & Chicana/o, Asian American & Pacific Islander, Native American/Indigenous Studies

Project 2025 and Heritage Foundation

12. Project 2025 Policy Framework

  • Heritage Foundation policy document
  • 900+ page policy blueprint
  • Sections on education, DEI elimination, and "colorblind" civil rights enforcement

Historical Events Referenced

13. 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre

  • Omitted from most textbooks until 21st century
  • Example of "missing history by design"

14. Japanese American Incarceration (WWII)

  • Executive Order 9066 (1942)
  • Approximately 120,000 Japanese Americans incarcerated

15. Chinese Exclusion Act (1882)

  • First federal law restricting immigration based on nationality
  • Rarely included in traditional history curricula

16. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848)

  • Ended Mexican-American War
  • U.S. acquired present-day California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and parts of Colorado and Wyoming

Additional Academic and Policy Sources

17. Textbook Adoption Policies

  • Texas State Board of Education influence on national textbook content
  • California curriculum frameworks
  • Market-driven content sanitization

18. Federal Grant Compliance Certifications

  • Required under Executive Order 14173
  • Affects universities, K-12 districts, research institutions
  • Mandate certification that DEI programs don't violate federal anti-discrimination laws

News and Media Coverage

19. KQED (San Francisco Public Radio)

20. Legal Analysis Sources

Note on Source Accessibility

As of July 23, 2026, many of these policies and legal cases are actively developing. Federal register documents, court filings, and official executive orders are publicly accessible through government websites. Legal analyses are available through law firm publications and civil rights organizations monitoring these policy changes.

For the most current information on ongoing litigation and policy implementation, consult:

  • Federal Register (federalregister.gov)
  • Department of Education official communications
  • State education department websites
  • Civil rights organization tracking databases


Posted by at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)