Latest News and Comment from Education

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

DCPS budget: RHEEFORM IMPACT’s impact - D.C. Schools Insider - The Washington Post

DCPS budget: IMPACT’s impact - D.C. Schools Insider - The Washington Post:

DCPS budget: IMPACT’s impact

There’s plenty for DCPS stakeholders to dislike in the newly released school-based budget allocations proposed for 2012-13. While they reflect a two-percent increase in the Uniform Per Student Funding Formula, they will still mean larger class sizes--as in, fewer teachers--at the middle and high school levels, along with cuts in positions such as special education coordinator.

Read full article >>

Estimados padres de las escuelas públicas de NYC….. | United Opt Out National

Estimados padres de las escuelas públicas de NYC….. | United Opt Out National:

Estimados padres de las escuelas públicas de NYC…..

School Tech Connect: Arne Duncan's Genie, Part 2

School Tech Connect: Arne Duncan's Genie, Part 2:

Arne Duncan's Genie, Part 2

Focusing On Neighborhood Assets — One Of My Favorite Lessons! | Larry Ferlazzo’s Websites of the Day…

Focusing On Neighborhood Assets — One Of My Favorite Lessons! | Larry Ferlazzo’s Websites of the Day…:

Focusing On Neighborhood Assets — One Of My Favorite Lessons!

We’re in the middle of one of my favorite units — where we focus on our neighborhood’s assets instead of its deficits.

I explain it more in detail at A Lesson Highlighting Community Assets — Not Deficits, and have a complete lesson plan, including hand-outs, in my book on Helping Students Motivate Themselves. In short, students compare our lower-income school neighborhood with the Fabulous Forties, commonly considered the most wealthy area of Sacramento, and they decide which neighborhood is the better one. Typically, about 95% of my students choose our neighborhood (though this year the percentage was a little lower — about 80$ choose the school neighborhood.

Today, students completed a response to the question “Which neighborhood was better?” using the “ABC”

California Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program - School Nutrition (CA Dept of Education)

California Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program - School Nutrition (CA Dept of Education):

California Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program


The Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program, administered by the California Dept of Education, provides schools with funding to offer students a free fresh fruit or vegetable snack during the school day.

Program Description

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) administers the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP) at the federal level. At the state level, the FFVP is administered by the California Department of Education (CDE), Nutrition Services Division (NSD). The purpose of this federal assistance program is to provide an additional free fresh fruit or vegetable snack to students during the school day as a supplement to (and not part of) the school breakfast and lunch programs, and to teach students about good nutrition. The FFVP also encourages grantees to develop partnerships at the state and local level for support in implementing and operating the program. The FFVP is a reimbursement grant program and selected schools receive a year-long grant (June–July) to implement the program. California first participated in the FFVP in July 2008 with 24 pilot schools and the program continues to grow each year.

Program Goals

The goal of the FFVP is to create healthier school environments by providing healthier food choices, and to:
  • Expand the fruits and vegetables children experience
  • Increase children’s fruit and vegetable consumption
  • Make a difference in children’s diets to impact their present and future health
The program is seen as an important catalyst for change in efforts to combat childhood obesity and by helping children learn more healthful eating habits.

Program History

The FFVP began as the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Pilot Program, authorized by Congress under the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–171) in a limited number of states and schools. The purpose of the pilot was to identify best practices for increasing fresh fruit and vegetable consumption among students and to determine the feasibility and students’ interest.
In 2008, the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Farm Bill) amended the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act by adding section 19, the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program. Section 19 authorized the program nationwide to 50 states (as well as the District of Columbia and the territories of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands) and provided significant funding increases, beginning with $40 million in federal fiscal year 2009 and growing to $150 million by 2012. After fiscal year 2012, annual changes will be made in accordance with the Consumer Price Index.

How Does It Work?

A School Food Authority (SFA) must submit an application to the CDE by the deadline each year to be considered for a grant. The following are considered to be SFAs and are eligible to apply for a FFVP grant:
  • School districts and county offices of education are eligible to apply on behalf of their school sites.
  • Direct funded charter schools are eligible to apply directly.
  • Private elementary schools are eligible to apply if they participate in the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and 50 percent or more of their students are eligible for free/reduced price meals.
  • Residential child care institutions may also apply if they operate an elementary school during the day and participate in the NSLP.
The State Agency (SA) is required to select elementary schools to participate that have the highest free and reduced price enrollment. Elementary schools who receive a grant are awarded $50.00–$75.00 per student for the school year. The SA identifies the per‐student funding based on total funds allocated to the state and the enrollment of applicant schools.
With these funds, schools purchase additional fresh fruits and vegetables to serve free to students as a snack during the school day. Participating school sites must serve the snack outside the normal time frames for the NSLP and School Breakfast Program (SBP). The SFA determines the best method to obtain and serve the additional fresh produce within the program requirements.
The SFAs participating in the FFVP submit monthly reimbursement claim forms, which are reviewed and approved by the SA. The SA reimburses the SFA for the cost of the fresh fruits and vegetables and limited non‐food costs.
The USDA provides funds to the SA to administer the program according to federal requirements.

Program Minimum Requirements

Schools have the flexibility to develop their own implementation plan, choose the type of produce, number of days a week (at least three days per week), and times during the day (outside of NSLP and SBP operation) to provide the free fresh fruit or vegetable snacks to their students. Schools must agree to widely publicize the availability of the program. Schools must follow all food safety requirements and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point guidance. Schools are encouraged to develop partnerships to help implement the program, such as with local universities, extension services, farmer’s markets, and local growers and grocers.
At a minimum, for a school to receive a FFVP grant they must:
  • Be an elementary school
  • Operate the National School Lunch Program
  • Have 50 percent or greater of enrolled students eligible for free and reduced price meals; priority given to those with the highest percentage
  • Have documented support of the food service, principal, and district superintendent
  • Submit a FFVP application to the NSD by the posted deadline—FFVP applications are available each spring (March) on the CDE Web site and are due four weeks after posting (April)
  • Implement the FFVP in accordance to the most recent guidelines issued by the USDA in their FFVP Handbook for Schools (PDF; Outside Source)

Program Reimbursement

The FFVP is a reimbursement grant. Therefore, grantees must expend their own funds and then submit a claim form (monthly) to the SA for reimbursement.
Payment Timeline: Upon receipt of a claim form, the NSD and the State Controller’s Office (SCO) will process the claim within 45 calendar days. Please note: once the SCO has mailed a reimbursement check, the time frame for a school to receive the payment will vary due to the practices within a specific county.

USDA Program Resources

FFVP Resources
Nutrition Education Resources
Program Guidelines

Program Contacts

For program questions, please contact Elizabeth Moreno, Nutrition Education Consultant, or David Hazeleaf, Program Specialist, by e-mail at FFVP@cde.ca.gov or by phone at 800-952-5609.

Federal Suspension and Expulsion Report - Year 2012 (CA Dept of Education)

Federal Suspension and Expulsion Report - Year 2012 (CA Dept of Education):

State Schools Chief Tom Torlakson Responds to Federal
Report on Student Suspension and Expulsion Rates

SACRAMENTO—State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson today applauded efforts by the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights (OCR) to shed light on the problem of excessive use of suspension and expulsion of students as a disciplinary tool in the nation's schools.

"Collecting this data helps us start crucial conversations at the local school level to ensure disciplinary practices are carried out fairly and equitably," said Torlakson. "I encourage all local educational agencies to continue to collect and analyze their suspension and expulsion data to determine whether their current practices are meeting the needs of their students, keeping in mind that the objective is to keep as many students as possible in a learning environment. We encourage all districts and sites to continue to seek behavioral interventions and options other than suspension and expulsion as a means of addressing student behavior."

Under state law, suspending or expelling students is the responsibility of the local school district. California is in the process of collecting more detailed student level data when reporting suspension and expulsion reports, as part of the state's conversion to the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System.

County and school district superintendents are required by state law every three years to develop Countywide Plans for Expelled Students and submit them to the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. These plans outline educational alternatives for expelled students, identify gaps in educational services to them, and develop strategies for filling those service gaps. The plan also identifies alternative placements for expelled pupils in community day school programs, but who fail to meet the terms and conditions of their rehabilitation plan, or who pose a danger to other students. The goals of the plan are to:

  1. Ensure that expelled students have appropriate options;
  2. Decrease the dropout rate;
  3. Increase the graduation rate; and
  4. Close the achievement gap.

To view the OCR suspension and expulsion report, please visit New Data from U.S. Department of Education Highlights Educational Inequities Around Teacher Experience, Discipline and High School Rigor | U.S. Department of Education (Outside Source). For California's suspension and expulsion report, please visit DataQuest. For California's Countywide Plans for Expelled Students, please visit Countywide Plans for Expelled Students - Educational Options.

# # # #

Tom Torlakson — State Superintendent of Public Instruction


Communications Division, Room 5206, 916-319-0818, Fax 916-319-0100

Big Education Ape: 3-6-12 PM #askarne Questions of Fundamental Fairness EDition #OCCUPYEDCA #SIGNON

Big Education Ape: PARENTS CAN!
Big Education Ape: PARENTS CAN!

Published by Coopmike48 – 8 news spotters today

Answering Questions of Fundamental Fairness

ed.gov - Earlier today, Secretary Duncan released new data from the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights that reveal unfortunate truths about our nation’s schools. The Civil Rights Data Collect...

arneduncan

Tribal Education Agency Pilot | ED.gov Blog

ed.gov - Thank you for your interest in the grant competition tentatively called the State-Tribal Education Partnership (STEP) Pilot, the Department’s pilot to provide an opportunity for tribes to meaningfu...

arneduncan

Hardly the reform we had in mind » The Commercial Appeal

commercialappeal.com - The public education "reform" movement, which began with the signing of the idiotic No Child Left Behind law in 2002, then morphed into the money grab called Race to the Top, which Tennessee legisl...

DianeRavitch

Black Teachers Fired En Masse

blackagendareport.com - Printer-friendly versionA Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen FordEducational policy in the Obama era isn't about education at all. It's about replacing skilled, experienced teachers with rootles...

DianeRavitch

Live Twitter stream on

@coopmike48/big-edu-ape-news-11

coopmike48 profile

coopmike48 Vice President Biden, Administration Officials Welcome Clarification of Countervailing Duty Law | The White House whitehouse.gov/the-press-offi…about 1 minute ago · reply · retweet · favorite

coopmike48 profile

coopmike48 Kwame Brown’s omnibus education act - D.C. Schools Insider - The Washington Postwashingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-schoo…51 seconds ago · reply · retweet · favorite

coopmike48 profile

coopmike48 Big Education Ape: Reform critic speaking in Hub City today - The Independent Weeklybigeducationape.blogspot.com/2012/03/reform…14 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite

EducationSee all

Analyzing Released NYC Value-Added Data Part 3

garyrubinstein.teachforus.org - The inaccuracy of the New York City teacher evaluation data is taking a beating in the media. As I expected, this data would not stand up to the scrutiny of the public or even the media. Value-Ad...

DianeRavitch

SocietySee all

PoliticsSee all

Exclusive: Russ Feingold Endorses Sheyman In IL-10

livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com - Former Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) has made his first endorsement in a Democratic primary since leaving the Senate. He's putting his weight and the strength of his PAC, Progressives United, behind Il...

mikeklonsky

HealthSee all

Partners in ‘slime’ - WWW.THEDAILY.COM

thedaily.com - The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s continued purchase of so-called pink slime for school lunches makes no sense, according to two former microbiologists at the Food Safety Inspection Service. “I ...

K12NN

Healthy Child’s Legacy—And Future « MomsRising Blog

momsrising.org - by Rachel Lincoln Sarnoff Executive Director/CEO Healthy Child Healthy Worldwww.healthychild.org I spent the past few weeks poring over the Healthy Child archives and I’m amazed at what I found. I ...

coopmike48

Art & EntertainmentSee all

TV's "New Girl" Teacher Is She One Of You?

scholasticadministrator.typepad.com - March 6, 2012 | Posted At: 10:23 AM | Author: Alexander Russo | Category: School Life Pop Culture She's not exactly Mr. Prezbo, but on "New Girl" hyper-quirky actress Zooey Deschanel plays a a char...

coopmike48

Michelle Rodriguez, Ancestry, PBS Series "Finding Your Roots"

hispanicallyspeakingnews.com - Michelle Rodriguez Among Those Discovery Their Ancestry on PBS Series “Finding Your Roots” Published at 6:18 pm EST, March 5, 2012 Photo Credits: Michelle Rodriguez, PBS Series "Finding Your Roots"...

coopmike48

AdultSee all

#occupyedcaSee all

March 5 Update! | Occupy Education California

occupyeducationca.org - 5:28pm EST 17 arrests so far at Occupy the Capitol action at the Governor’s Office in Albany. 5:21pm EST Now up 13 arrests at the Governor’s Office in the Capitol Building in Albany chanting “The s...

K12NN

#signonSee all

VideosSee all