Saturday, April 15, 2017

President of teachers union will speak on the future of education | Around the O

President of teachers union will speak on the future of education | Around the O:

President of teachers union will speak on the future of education

Randi Weingarten
For the last event in its “Future of Public Education” series, the Wayne Morse Center for Law and Politics is hosting Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, to speak in Portland for a for a free public talk Tuesday, April 25, and also in Eugene on Wednesday, April 26.
The leader of the 1.6 million-member educators’ union, American Federation of Teachers, Weingarten was named as one of the most influential New Yorkers in the past 25 years by the New York Observer. Washington Life magazine also included Weingarten on its 2013 Power 100 list of influential leaders. At her speech on Tuesday, she plans to address the federation’s interest in the future of both K-12 and higher education issues.
As the federation’s leader, Weingarten said that public education is a foundation ofdemocracy,  and stressed that it’s vital to ensure that all schools are successful.
 “There are common traits in every school that is working as it should,” she said in a recent interview. “I call them the four pillars of effective public schools: promoting children’s well-being, supporting powerful learning, building teacher capacity and fostering school and community collaboration. While these pillars are effective, they’re not a given in our schools. And deep cuts to K-12 and higher education have set us even further back.”
Formerly a lawyer and a high school history teacher, Weingarten served for 12 years as president of the United Federation of Teachers, AFT Local 2 in New York City, representing 200,000 public school educators and home child care providers. Also a New York Times columnist, Weingarten was appointed by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo to serve on the Common Core Task Force in 2013 and recently has pushed efforts to make education reform one of her union’s and the nation’s highest priorities.
“Twenty-three states spend less on education than they did before the Great Recession,” she said. “On top of that, President Trump wants to slash $9 billion in education spending, which would be the largest cut ever made to the U.S. Education Department. We’ve got to focus on what works, and show that we value public education and higher education by making adequate investments in them.”
The event in Portland will take place at 5:30 p.m. April 25 at the First Congregational United Church of Christ, 1126 SW Park Ave. The Eugene event will be at 7 p.m. April 26 at the Giustina Ballroom in the Ford Alumni Center.  
The event is co-sponsored by AFT-Oregon, the World Affairs Council, United Academics, AAUP-AFT Local 3209 and the UO Labor Education and Research center.
 President of teachers union will speak on the future of education | Around the O:

Seattle Schools Community Forum: Things That Make You Go, Hmmm

Seattle Schools Community Forum: Things That Make You Go, Hmmm:

Things That Make You Go, Hmmm

Image result for Things That Make You Go, Hmmm

Interesting but somewhat concerning article from the Chicago Tribune about students who take the state's free SAT who then find that the score appears on their transcript (whether they want it there or a not).  

While the test is designed to evaluate whether a student is prepared for college, some parents say it's unfair to rely on just one exam. They note that anything from an illness to anxiety could disrupt the test-taking process, leaving students stuck with a score that could hurt their child's chances of getting into their dream school.
Well, yeah. Some kids take the SAT multiple times.  Some do better on the ACT.  Why wouldn't the student and their parent decide what score goes to admissions offices?   Seems like this could be an opt-in thing rather than a blanket item.

Anyone heard of this for SPS?   

Jonathan Knapp, former head of the Seattle Education Association, is running to be the head of the Washington Education Association.  He has quite the interesting (and impressive) resume.  Sadly, he misspells McCleary as "McCleery,"  And he certainly wastes no words in criticizing past administrations.  

OSPI just released data on student attendance and absenteeism, saying Washington state was recently ranked second-worst in the U.S. for the number of chronically missing students.


For the 2015-16 school year, an average of 16.7 percent of students Seattle Schools Community Forum: Things That Make You Go, Hmmm:

6 Ways to Spread Happiness in the Classroom - Teacher Habits

6 Ways to Spread Happiness in the Classroom - Teacher Habits:

6 Ways to Spread Happiness in the Classroom


It’s an exciting day here at Teacher Habits Headquarters! We have our first guest post! Paul Ellsworth (aka Profe Pablo) is a high school Spanish Teacher and a writer. He loves trying “out of the box” classroom management techniques to create a fun and productive classroom. He writes about his classroom at ProfePablo.com. There you can download his Top 25 Teaching Tricks or even tune into his podcast Schooled Radio. Today, he writes about spreading happiness in the classroom, a subject near and dear to my heart, and, not-so-coincidentally, the subject of my next book, Happy Teacher, available on Amazon by the end of the month.

6 Ways to Spread Happiness in the Classroom

When analyzing the classroom often we look at test scores or students’ grades. Grades are important, but what if grades were not a true indicator of success?
Instead of looking at the grades first, what if I asked you about your students’ happiness?
You would think I was crazy.
However, in his book The Happiness Advantage, positive psychology expert Shawn Achor proves that success doesn’t lead to6 Ways to Spread Happiness in the Classroom - Teacher Habits:

Closing schools is not an educational option | Eclectablog

Closing schools is not an educational option | Eclectablog:

Closing schools is not an educational option

The suggestion that the solution to poorly performing students is simply closing schools is merely following what has become a common trope in the corporate education reform community–the notion that “the problems” in education can be solved simply by, variously, “getting rid of the bad teachers“, converting public schools to charter schools, continuously raising standards, or increasing the amount of standardized testing for students. Much of this rhetoric chooses to ignore the role that the corporate reform agenda itself has played in contributing to “the problems” in education, but that’s an issue for another day.
Whenever I hear public officials and education policy decision makers suggest that closing schools is a legitimate strategy, I know that person is not serious about actually improving educational outcomes. The decision to close a school is not made to improve student learning, or to increase the effectiveness of teachers. Put simply, closing a school is a business decision. School closings are a strategy lifted from the “creative destruction” school of thought championed by economists like Joseph Schumpeter, and vulture capitalists such as Mitt Romney. The goal is to maximize financial resources, sell off existing assets, and provide an attractive return to one’s investors.
For these reasons, we tend to see more school closings in the charter school sector, especially for-profit charters–some for financial mismanagement, others for low enrollment, and still others for…more nefarious reasons. Now, while I’m no fan of for-profit charters, I still don’t believe that closing these schools makes any sense as an educational strategy.
When a school is closed, it creates more problems than when your local auto dealer or dry cleaner closes. While you may have to find a different place to buy a new car or clean your suit, closing a school disrupts an entire community.
Closing a school fractures families, scatters colleagues, and damages neighborhoods. Schools are not just places that children go during the day when their parents go to work–they are complicated, complex ecological and social systems that provide spaces for learning communities to develop and flourish. Schools are places where children go to feel safe, and to feel valued. Schools are Closing schools is not an educational option | Eclectablog:

May Day: A Day Without Immigrants - Strike! Hundreds Of Thousands Of Workers Will Strike May 1, Organizers Say

May Day: A Day Without Immigrants - Strike! Hundreds Of Thousands Of Workers Will Strike May 1, Organizers Say:

May Day: A Day Without Immigrants - Strike! Hundreds Of Thousands Of Workers Will Strike May 1, Organizers Say


Portside Date: 
April 13, 2017


Date of Source: 
Thursday, April 13, 2017


Cosecha

 
 Our Vision
 
Cosecha is a nonviolent movement activating the migrant community and the public at large to fight for permanent protection, dignity, and respect for all immigrants in the United States. Developed by organizers who watched immigration reform stall in Congress for over a decade, Cosecha is taking a new approach. We believe that in order to win real protection for our communities, we need to mobilize millions of active supporters—by polarizing the American people to take an active stance on immigration issues.
 
Our work honors and draws from the legacy of other social movements in this country. We are students of the thousands of farmworkers who, under the leadership of Dolores Huerta, Larry Itliong and Cesar Chavez, fought back against labor exploitation. We have learned from the millions of African Americans who challenged the racism of Jim Crow and fueled the Civil Rights Movement. Building on this tradition, Cosecha views non-cooperation as our best tactic for building popular support and securing real victories for the 11 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S. 
 
Why We're Striking
 
Time and time again our community is called upon to vote for the next Deporter-in-Chief, whether Obama or Trump, who will shape immigration policy for the next four to eight years. Each election, we’re promised that if we vote for the Democrats, they will give us immigration reform. When their promises go unfulfilled--when Obama deports 3 million immigrants or when Trump expands his power to deport and terrorize our communities--what do we do? We strike.
 
Long enough have we voted, marched in DC, and gone to court to protect the morsels of protection that we have; longer still have we endured pain as our communities are exploited, unrecognized, shamed, and torn apart.
 
Let’s be clear. We are not striking to make the Republicans like us or to pass legislation that is in our favor. We are not striking because we want to remove Trump’s oppressive executive orders. We are striking because our fight is not in DC--it's in every home, business, and industry that takes advantage of our labor and consumption. By striking, we make it clear that this country cannot function without immigrants. We build confidence that through non-cooperation, we can force this country to recognize us and realize that it depends on us. It is not until the United States accepts that it cannot sustain itself without immigrant labor that we will be able to win permanent protection, dignity, and respect.
 
On February 16th, the immigrant community demonstrated their readiness and willingness to self-organize. The first Day Without Immigrants made waves all over the media. Now, Cosecha is pushing to organize a series of intensifying strikes.
 
We will start with one day, but we are going for seven--a week without immigrants. We will end with dignity, respect, and permanent protection.
 
Frequently Asked Questions
 
  • What are your demands?
We are fighting for a new day of justice, reconciliation and unity for our immigrant communities. Cosecha’s demands are permanent protection, dignity, and respect for the migrant community in this country.
 
  • What does permanent protection mean?
When we say permanent protection, we envision a change in the treatment of immigrants in this country. We visualize a future where immigrants are able to work and travel freely without the risk or fear of deportation. A future where we can walk the streets of this country with the recognition that we are a part of it. A future where we are not treated as outsiders, where our communities are not criminalized, and where we don’t have to abide by the narrative of a model immigrant.
 
  • How will workers be protected?
We want to make sure workers that go on strike are protected. This takes continuous preparation and communication and an understanding that you are not striking alone. Cosecha is organizing an extensive network of legal support that can respond to unfair repercussions of striking. Workers will be protected through a strike fund that will help workers meet their essential needs during the strike. Cosecha will also provide necessary information in preparation of the strike so workers know their rights.
 
  • Is this strike for immigrants only?
We constantly attempt to ground ourselves in the pain of the immigrant experience. Whether you are an immigrant or not we welcome you to join us in striking as long as you abide by our principles. http://www.lahuelga.com/strategy/ [1]
 


The Reality Check: THE SADNESS OF THE BORDER WALL

The Reality Check: THE SADNESS OF THE BORDER WALL:

THE SADNESS OF THE BORDER WALL

By David Bacon

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1536504217696064

https://contexts.org/ 


In Playas de Tijuana, on the Mexican side of the border wall between Mexico and the U.S., Catelina Cespedes and Carlos Alcaide greet Florita Galvez, who is on the U.S. side. The family came from Santa Monica Cohetzala in Puebla to meet at the wall.


It took two days on the bus for Catalina Cespedes and her husband Teodolo Torres to get from their hometown in Puebla - Santa Monica Cohetzala - to Tijuana.  On a bright Sunday in May they went to the beach at Playas de Tijuana.  There the wall separating Mexico from the United States plunges down a steep hillside and levels off at the Parque de Amistad, or Friendship Park, before crossing the sand and heading out into the Pacific surf.  

Sunday is the day for families to meet through the border wall.  The couple had come to see their daughter, Florita Galvez. 




Florita Galvez is on the U.S. side of the border wall between Mexico and the U.S., and her family on the Mexican side can only see her through holes in the metal mesh.


Florita had arrived that day in San Ysidro, the border town a half hour south of San Diego.  Then she went out to the Border Field State Park, by the ocean two miles west of town.  From the parking lot at the park entrance it was a 20-minute walk down a dirt road to the section of the wall next to the Parque de Amistad.

At 11 that morning, Catalina and Florita finally met, separated by the metal border.  They looked at each other through the metal screen that covers the wall's bars, in the small area where people on the U.S. side can actually get next to it.  And they touched.  Catalina pushed a finger through one of the screen's half-inch square holes.  On the other side, Florita touched it with her own finger. 



On the Mexican side of the border wall Catelina Cespedes sticks her finger through a hole in the mesh so that she can touch the finger of her daughter, Florita Galvez, who is on the other side, the only physical contact possible between people on each side.


Another family shared the space with Catalina and Teodolo.  Adriana Arzola had brought her baby Nazeli Santana, now several months old, to meet her family living on the U.S. side for the first time.  Adriana had family with her also - her grandmother and grandfather, two older children and a brother and sister.  

It was very frustrating, though, to try to see people on the other side through the half-inch holes.  So they moved along the wall to a place where the screen ended.  There the vertical eighteen-foot iron bars of the wall - what the wall is made of in most places - are separated by spaces about four inches wide.  Family members in the U.S. could see the baby as Adriana held her up.

But only from a distance.  The rules imposed by the U.S. Border Patrol in Border Field State Park say that where there's no screen the family members on that side have to stay several feet away from the wall.  So no touching.



Adriana Arzola, her sister and her baby Nayeli Santana talk with her family living in the U.S. through the bars of the wall.  On the U.S. side, her family has to stay several feet away from the wall, so they can't touch each other through the bars.


I could see the sweep of emotions playing across the faces of everyone, and in their body language.  One minute the grandmother was laughing, and the next there were tears in her eyes.  The grandfather just smiled and smiled.  Adriana talked to her relatives, and tried to wake the baby up.  Her brother leaned on the bars with his arms folded against his eyes, and her sister turned away, overcome by sadness.  On the U.S. side, a man in a wheelchair and two women with him looked happy just to have a chance to see their family again. 

Some volunteers, most from the U.S. side, called Friends of Friendship Park, have tried to make the Mexican side The Reality Check: THE SADNESS OF THE BORDER WALL:

NaughtyBots Part 3: Advocacy and Marginalization | Truth in American Education

NaughtyBots Part 3: Advocacy and Marginalization | Truth in American Education:

NaughtyBots Part 3: Advocacy and Marginalization


This is the third part in a four part NaughtyBots series about the #commoncore Project: How Social Media is Changing the Politics of Education.
Advocacy
The BotNet, or naught, issue was addressed in the previous installment so there is no need to address it again. This section will have a focus on the advocacy of Common Core opponents.
On page 32 of the project’s pdf report it says:
“As the data show, in many ways, Prasek and the PJNET Team accomplished what they set out to do. Not only did they dominate the Common Core conversation
on Twitter, but they also achieved their stated goal of promoting a set of “conservative topics, causes, and legislation.” What is even more intriguing is that the group is apparently unaffiliated with any registered political action committee. They are instead a homegrown grassroots social media movement intent on promoting their social and political agendas, cleverly aided by BotNets and hashtag rallies.”
file0001949378562That team is portrayed as a grassroots social media movement. Since the Project looked at the use of Twitter, this limited view is understandable. The team, or advocates, is more than a social media movement. Many are very involved in opposing the Common Core outside of social media. That outside social media involvement includes writing articles, writing letters to the editor, calling and working with legislators, attending school board meetings, testifying, and giving presentations.
It is fair to portray this as a homegrown grassroots effort. The on-Twitter and off-Twitter opposition NaughtyBots Part 3: Advocacy and Marginalization | Truth in American Education:

This Week In Education: DeVos Hires; NY Announces Free College And Free Textbooks : NPR Ed : NPR

This Week In Education: DeVos Hires; NY Announces Free College And Free Textbooks : NPR Ed : NPR:

This Week In Education: DeVos Hires; NY Announces Free College And Free Textbooks


Greetings and welcome to our weekly roundup of education news from Washington and around the country:
DeVos hires

U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos made her first official staff announcement this week, with 10 names.
Among them: Josh Venable, will serve as DeVos' chief of staff. He worked on the presidential campaign of former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, and is an advocate of both school choice and the Common Core.
Robert Eitel, who was a lawyer in the department under President George W. Bush and also worked for the owner of a for-profit college, will serve as senior counsel to the secretary.
Candice Jackson will be Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Office for Civil Rights and Acting Assistant Secretary. Her brief at OCR will include prosecuting campuses for violations of Title IX, including sexual assault cases. Jackson is the author of a book focusing on women who have accused Bill Clinton of sexual harassment and abuse.
Big Education Ape: DeVos Pick to Head Civil Rights Office Once Said She Faced Discrimination for Being White - ProPublica - http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2017/04/devos-pick-to-head-civil-rights-office.html
Ebony Lee, another veteran of the Bush administration who has also worked for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, will be deputy chief of staff for policy.


Student loan regulation rollback
In a letter sent on Tuesday, DeVos withdrew several policy memos from the previous administration involving consumer protections for student loan borrowers.
Student loan repayment is managed in part by for-profit loan servicers. In her letter, DeVos cited the need to limit the cost to taxpayers of loan servicing. The Obama-era guidance had instead emphasized protection for borrowers.
This may be good news for Navient, the largest student loan servicer. As we noted last week, the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in January sued Navient, alleging that it "illegally cheated borrowers" out of their rights and their money — as much as $4 billion — through patterns of deception and misapplying payments.
Navient has denied wrongdoing, calling the suit "unsubstantiated, unjustified and politically driven."
Protecting the Secretary
Image result for big education ape DeVos  protective security from the U.S. Marshals Service.
In case you missed it, DeVos is receiving full, 24/7 protective security from the U.S. Marshals Service.
Most every White House cabinet official gets some level of protection, of course. But often it's door-to-door and not a round-the-clock detail, let alone from active duty federal law enforcement agents.
"This is unique," Marshals Service spokeswoman Nikki Credic-Barrett tells us. "The Attorney General felt that there was a need for her to be provided with a protective detail."
Credic-Barrett declined to say how many Marshals are protecting DeVos or the nature of the threat, only that "the detail is commensurate with the existing threat" and based on the service's "requirements, experience and methodology."
The extra money for security comes as President Trump's proposed budget contains deep cuts to the Education department. The Marshals Service says its contract with the Department of Education will cost taxpayers $7.78 million, from mid-February through Sept. 30, or about $1 million a month.
Credic-Barrett says the Marshals Service has not protected a cabinet official since the head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, better known as the "Drug Czar," held cabinet rank. That ended 8 years ago.
Protesters showed up at many appearances by President Trump's cabinet officials, including DeVos, during the confirmation process. The only known security "incident" for DeVos since she took office was a February visit to a Washington, D.C., public school where several protesters shouted "shame, shame!" and temporarily blocked her and an aide from entering.
Scott Pruitt, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, has also asked for additional round-the-clock security. Pruitt is facing criticism for backing a 31 percent slice to the agency's budget, including research for climate change, among other deep cuts.
Free college for New York State 

Charter School Builds Wall of Shame to Hide the Truth

Shame on American Prep Academy:
Shame on American Prep Academy
‘Shame’ Sign & ‘Spite’ Fence Mark Charter Debate in Utah

In an era of social media, charter school messaging went hard core 20th Century last week in Draper, Utah, about a half-hour south of Salt Lake City.
First, homeowners Josh and Emily Aune put a banner on their fence promoting a website critical of the American Preparatory Academy charter school, ShameOnAPA.org. Then, the school constructed a fence that the homeowners believe was put there to obstruct the view of the anti-charter school banner.
The Aune home is located next to the school’s driveway.
See the full story by the Salt Lake City Tribune.
H/T ChoiceMediaTV


SHAME ON AMERICAN PREP
Taking massive profits while abusing their neighbors. 

(This is a new site, please share your photos, stories, news articles, edits, corrections, etc) 
Updated 04/12/2017, email working, updated articles.

ARTICLES

Here is a Salt Lake Tribute article that discusses some issues with charter schools and APA specifically: Analysis: Utah charter schools move millions of public dollars to the coffers of a few private companies. This is particularly relevant to APA as they are one of the handful of charters to utilize the split non-profit school entity/for-profit management company methodology, which hides the pay and expenses of all of the top individuals. There are other ways that copyright, trademark or other intellectual property protections can be established without a for-profit management company.
In 2011 80% of Michigan Charter Schools are For-Profits (forbes.com) and then in 2016 A Sea of Charter Schools in Detroit Leaves Students Adrift (nytimes.com). Utah is on this path. See the awfully boring section Brief history of Charter schools in Utah for more details on how charter schools in Utah grew up, the laws that allow APA to treat it's neighbors this way, and what reforms are needed to keep charters healthy in the future. We need healthy charter schools, Utah can't afford to end up like Michigan.
All Of This Has Happened Before And Will Happen Again
--Battlestar Galactica


Join the Facebook Group

KEY NEIGHBORHOOD ISSUES

American Preparatory Academy (APA) is our neighbor, we would like to welcome them to our Draper Utah community and believe a school is an excellent use for this property. Sadly APA did not do appropriate diligence prior to purchasing the land and constructing phase one, the elementary school. APA has created significant ongoing harm to our community for the past several years through the elementary alone, and now APA is building a high school expansion which will only increase the negative impacts to our community.
We request APA to work with us to put together an action plan for the items below, including: agreed upon success criteria, the plan for addressing each with time frame, and for long term items a self evaluation and reporting mechanism. A more detailed history of various issues can be found below.
  • Traffic Note: Phase2 as currently submitted to Draper City as public record
    will likely block access to the neighborhood for twice as long as Phase1
    alone currently blocks access.
  • Traffic Note: There is no substantiated evidence supporting the belief that
    11950S will affect traffic flow, the issue of fire access via 119500 S is
    independent of resolving traffic concerns.
  • Traffic Safety: How will traffic be kept out of the neighborhood, especially
    out of our driveways? Current attempts to talk to offenders have not worked.
    Causes for neighborhood driving include avoiding the no left turn rule, dropping
    off children in the neighborhood to avoid excessive traffic lines
  • Traffic Safety: How will traffic patters creating an extremely unsafe exit
    from the neighborhood be improved?
  • Traffic Safety: What policies will be put in place by fire, police and other
    emergency vehicles to ensure the safety of children in the Inauguration
    neighborhood when accessing the fire gate at the back of the subdivision.
  • Traffic Safety: How will the school ensure parents do not drop children off
    in the neighborhood to avoid the excessively long lines? Current policies have
    been ineffective. This must include license plate based identification.
  • Traffic Delays: How will traffic blocking access to/from the neighborhood be improved?
  • Privacy: APA has constructed their site with no regard to the privacy of
    the neighbors. Previously private back yards are now exposed and windows can
    easily be peered through as parents idle in the pickup/drop off queue. How
    will APA return privacy to the affected neighbors?
    • Yay! APA has promised to install an 8 ft vinyl fence along the length of the
      property and will discuss a grading plan with each of the property owners prior
      to starting construction. Time line is TBD but some time prior to Phase2 completion.
  • Nuisance Construction Noise: How will APA ensure their contractors obey noise ordinances?
    • Yay! After a few false starts, APA has limited their start time to 7AM for the last several days!
  • Nuisance Construction Dust: We are happy to report that after
    several interactions, APA has started to follow required dust mitigation policies.
    We hope to be able to continue to report this positive improvement
  • Nuisance Ongoing: How will APA handle noise and light pollution related
    nuisance cases in the future? Of greatest concern is early morning and after
    hours activities, ambient safety light pollution and excessive noise on the
    entry/exit from teenage drivers.
  • Neighborhood Integrity: If APA fails to gain access to 11950 S, what is
    the maintenance plan that will be followed to ensure the destroyed home site
    does not become an eyesore and further detract from property values? What is
    the escalation path neighbors can utilize and what is the turn around
    time?
Join the Facebook Group

INDEX OF ISSUE DETAILS

FAILURE TO PLAN FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT

TRAFFIC ACCESS IMPLICATIONS

The Phase1 traffic study indicated there would be little to no queuing on Loan Peak Parkway, but with just the elementary in operation there is 3,500 feet of on street queuing. Residents are often stuck inside the neighborhood for 10 minutes in the morning during a 30 minute window. APA claims that Phase2 will improve queuing but their traffic study is again likely deficient. Back logs of 3500 feet are frequently observed with the current phase1 traffic load. Phase2 will increase the total per minute traffic load as well as the active traffic time from 30 to 60 minutes. The added on site queuing is not sufficient to handle the current 3500 ft of on road queuing and thus It is highly likely the residents will be stuck inside their neighborhood from APA traffic for a full hour, rather than the half hour seen today.
To make matters worse, APA does not refresh their engineering traffic impact plans when they increase the school's headcount. APA told Draper City that Phase1 would consist of 960 students, after their plans were approved they requested and were approved by the state charter board an increase of funding to 1,100 students. APA has provided no indication that they investigated the impacts of this increase on the surrounding community, as is typically done via filings with the city planning department.
APA plans to use this tactic again. They already have on the agenda a request to increase the combined Phase1+Phase2 campus to from the engineered headcount of 1610 to somewhere over 1700.

TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPLICATIONS

There are currently ongoing traffic safety issues including in-neighborhood near misses of children, pet deaths and several car wrecks. Causes include unsafe entry and exit from the neighborhood; parents turning around in the neighborhood and using residents driveways, and parents dropping children off in the neighborhood. Phase2 will compound these issues with additional traffic, emergency services gate, and a large influx of young high school drivers. The Inauguration neighborhood's main roads were not designed with sufficient off street parking and the roads are often lined with cars, creating blind spots and one way choke points. The neighborhood also has many many families with small children playing outside. There was a recent 3 year old who died from a similar situation less than 2 miles away. This is a significant hazard on it's own for experienced drivers but the situation will become extremely dangerous with young inexperienced drivers in play.
The future fire access gate creates safety issues for the neighborhood. A fire truck or other emergency vehicles with their blinking lights will draw children out to see them, possibly appearing out from behind a parked car. We would like some special consideration applied by the emergency services when driving on the neighborhood's streets, and to try avoid using the access gate. Initially the gate had been left incomplete and walk able. During this time APA parents would drive to the back of the neighborhood and drop their children off to avoid waiting in the horrendous traffic created by the poorly designed facilities. This method of accessing the school has been expressly forbidden by Draper City's Planning Commission.
Inauguration residents are not the only ones sick of the traffic. APA parents are so desperate to bypass the excessive traffic lines that when there is a fence down, parents will drop their children off inside the neighborhood and have them tress pass through a homes back yard to avoid the traffic lines. Safety issues and property rights violations all on one!
Shame on American Prep Academy: