Latest News and Comment from Education

Monday, September 21, 2015

Lower test scores for students who use computers frequently in school, 31 country study finds - The Hechinger Report

Lower test scores for students who use computers frequently in school, 31 country study finds - The Hechinger Report:

Lower test scores for students who use computers frequently in school, 31 country study finds

In top performing nations, teachers, not students, use technology





For those of us who worry that Google might be making us stupid, and that, perhaps, technology and education don’t mix well, here’s a new study to confirm that anxiety.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) looked at computer use among 15-year-olds across 31 nations and regions, and found that students who used computers more at school had both lower reading and lower math scores, as measured by PISA or Program for International Student Assessment. The study, published September 15, 2015, was actually conducted back in 2012, when the average student across the world, for example, was using the Internet once a week, doing software drills once a month, and emailing once a month. But the highest-performing students were using computers in the classroom less than that.
“Those that use the Internet every day do the worst,” said Andreas Schleicher, OECD Director for Education and Skills, and author of “Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection,” the OECD’s first report to look at the digital skills of students around the world. The study controlled for income and race; between two similar students, the one who used computers more, generally scored worse.* 
Home computer use, by contrast, wasn’t as harmful to academic achievement. Many students in many high performing nations reported spending between one to two hours a day on a computer outside of school. Across the 31 nations and regions, the average 15-year-old spent more than two hours a day on the computer. (Compare your country here).
Back in the classroom, however, school systems with more computers tended to be improving less, the study found. Those with fewer computers were seeing larger educational gains, as measured by PISA test score changes between 2009 and 2012. 
“That’s pretty sobering for us,” said Schleicher in a press briefing. “We all hope that integrating more and more technology is going to help us enhance learning environments, make learning more interactive, introduce more experiential learning, and give students access to more advanced knowledge. But it doesn’t seem to be working like this.”
Schleicher openly worried that if students end up “cutting and pasting information from Google” into worksheets with “prefabricated” questions, “then they’re not going to learn a lot.”
“There are countless examples of where the appropriate use of technology has had and is having a positive impact on achievement,” said Bruce Friend, the chief operating officer of iNACOL, a U.S.-based advocacy group for increasing the use of technology in education. “We shouldn’t use this report to think that technology doesn’t have a place.”

Seattle Education Association members ratified the new contract | Seattle Education

Seattle Education Association members ratified the new contract | Seattle Education:

Seattle Education Association members ratified the new contract



logo
What we know so far is that at the General Membership Meeting this evening, members of the Seattle Education Association voted to ratify the new agreement with Seattle Public Schools.
Per the Seattle Education Association’s website, the highlights of the contract include:
  • Recess: Guaranteed 30 minutes of recess for all elementary students.
  • Reasonable testing: New policies to reduce the over-testing of our students.
  • Professional pay: Base salary increases of 3 percent, 2 percent and 4.5 percent, plus the state COLA of 4.8 percent
  • Fair teacher and staff evaluations: Test scores will no longer be tied to teacher evaluations, plus there is new contract language that supports teachers’ professional growth.
  • Educator workload relief: Additional staff to reduce workloads and provide student services.
  • Student equity around discipline and the opportunity gap: Creating race and equity teams at 30 of the district’s schools.
  • The administration’s proposal to lengthen the school day: Teachers will be compensated for additional work.
It was a great time in Seattle during the strike with parents, students, the Seattle City Council, legislative districts, community organizations, other workers’ unions and citizens showing their support for our teachers.
Now it’s time to settle back into the new school year but something has changed and I believe we are all better for it.
We met, made new connections, showed pride in our teachers and our school communities, shared laughter and concerns, shared our food, our homes, our time and energy with our teachers and now they return to the classrooms knowing we appreciate them and are here for them.
We have their backs.



What the Data Actually Says About Shifting Views on the Common Core :: Frederick M. Hess

What the Data Actually Says About Shifting Views on the Common Core :: Frederick M. Hess:

What the Data Actually Says About Shifting Views on the Common Core

There've been a lot of claims made of late about what Americans think of the Common Core. The back-and-forth features a lot of push polls and agenda-driven analysis. As oneWashington Post headline proclaimed earlier this year, "Conservatives hate Common Core. The rest of America? Who knows." So, let's take a moment to sort things out. There are two national annual polls of attitudes towards education: one by Gallup/Phi Delta Kappan and the other by Education Next (full disclosure: I'm an executive editor ofEducation Next). Today, these are the only credible, independent numbers providing a year-over-year measure of national sentiment. Conveniently, both organizations released their 2015 surveys a few weeks back, marking the start of the 2015-16 school year.
Between 2010 and 2015, each survey featured two Common Core questions that were asked more than once.
In 2012 and 2013, PDK/Gallup asked: "Do you believe common core standards would help make education in the United States more competitive globally, less competitive globally, or have no effect?" In 2012, 53 percent of respondents said the Common Core would make the U.S. "more competitive" and just 7 percent that it would make the U.S. "less competitive." Democrats were positive at 65-5, and Republicans, 44-5. In 2013, the pro-Common Core split declined to 41-21, with Democratic support falling to 46-14 and Republican to 32-26. Democratic enthusiasm actually fell more than Republican enthusiasm. The question has not been asked since.
The other question that PDK/Gallup has asked multiple times is: "Do you favor or oppose having the teachers in your community use the Common Core state standards to guide what they teach?" This question was asked in 2014 and in 2015. In 2014, the public was opposed to teachers using the Common Core by a 33 to 60 margin. Democrats favored teachers using the Common Core by 53-38, but Republicans opposed it by 17-76 and independents by 34-60. In 2015, national sentiment and Republican sentiment was broadly unchanged, though Democratic opinion shifted from 53-38 in favor to 35-38 against.
Each year since 2012, Education Next has asked: "As you may know, all states are currently deciding whether or not to adopt the Common Core standards in reading and math. If adopted, these standards would be used to hold the state's schools accountable for their performance. Do you support or oppose the adoption of the Common Core standards in your state?" In 2012, respondents supported the Common Core 63-7 (support was 63 percent among Republicans and 65 percent among Democrats). By 2015, support was 49-35— the pro-Common Core margin had shrunk from 56 points to 14. Between 2012 and 2015, Republican sentiment shifted from 63-7 in favor to 37-50 against. Democratic support softened from 65-5 to 57-25.


In 2012, 2014, and 2015, Education Next also asked the same question, but without the words "Common Core." The question reads: "As you may know, in the last few years states have been deciding whether or not to use standards for reading and math that are the same across the states. In the states that have these standards, they will be used to hold public schools accountable for their performance. Do you support or What the Data Actually Says About Shifting Views on the Common Core :: Frederick M. Hess:

Hypocrisy on exhibit at L.A.’s Broad museum opening. | Fred Klonsky

Hypocrisy on exhibit at L.A.’s Broad museum opening. | Fred Klonsky:

Hypocrisy on exhibit at L.A.’s Broad museum opening.

protest39


UTLA teachers outside. Froo-froo inside.
While Bill Clinton and other members of the froo-froo class drank white wine and dined on finger food inside the new Broad Museum in Los Angeles, a thousand L.A. teachers protested the role many of the rich inside played in promoting charter schools and defeating California’s Prop 30, a proposal to raise taxes to fund public schools, including arts program funding.
Jay Davis, an art teacher at Augustus F. Hawkins High School, spoke to the assembled protesters about the importance of art in schools and communities.
“We’re grateful to send a clear message together to say that arts literacy isn’t something you just buy and hang on a wall, or simply absorb through a passing gaze in a museum,” Davis said.
Beyond arts funding, protesters raised concerns with Broad’s charter school plan, which, according to (UTLA President Alex) Caputo-Pearl, will entail “half a billion to a billion dollars” to fund charter schools, taking students out of LAUSD schools.
Caputo-Pearl said charter schools, which are not managed transparently by a public entity, do not have to follow the same guidelines as public schools, are prone to specially pick students for admission and do not facilitate a public process for teachers to interact with parents.
The Los Angeles Times was gushing in reporting about the party thrown by billionaire Eli and his wife, Edye Broad.
Another gala opening Friday for nearly 700 more guests, and another 
Hypocrisy on exhibit at L.A.’s Broad museum opening. | Fred Klonsky:


 Big Education Ape: Teachers union holds protest outside Broad museum on opening day - LA Times http://bit.ly/1FWf5W3

Activists say hunger strike over Chicago school has ended - Yahoo News

Activists say hunger strike over Chicago school has ended - Yahoo News:

Activists say hunger strike over Chicago school has ended






CHICAGO (AP) — Activists have announced the end of a 34-day hunger strike over the fate of a Chicago neighborhood school, an effort that garnered national headlines when supporters disrupted public budget hearings held by Mayor Rahm Emanuel.
About a dozen activists went without solid foods over the plans for Walter H. Dyett High School, which was once slated for a phased-out closure. Officials with the nation's third-largest school district had cited poor performance and declining enrollment, but later said they'd consider proposals to reopen it. Earlier this month Chicago Public Schools CEO Forrest Claypool announced it would reopen as an arts-focused school.
However, the activists, who wanted a community partnership for a green technology school, said they weren't happy and continued their strike. They said their efforts were sparked by what they considered racial disparities in the school system — Dyett is located in the historically black Bronzeville neighborhood — and that the decision-making for the school's future wasn't transparent or in line with what the area wanted.
They announced the end of the hunger strike on Saturday over health and safety concerns, saying more details would follow in the coming days.
"We did not want to see one of our fellow hunger strikers die," said activist Aisha Wade-Bey, according to The Chicago Sun-Times (http://bit.ly/1LGwDHE ).
Parents and activists had long opposed the closure of Dyett.
The efforts drew widespread attention when protests became so intense at a community budget hearing this month that Emanuel was escorted from the room. The group of hunger strikers, who sought help from U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, also drew solidarity from the Rev. Jesse Jackson.
Claypool said plans for the new open-enrollment school were made after consulting with the community and the group's concerns were considered, even though not all demands were met.
Information from: Chicago Sun-Times, http://chicago.suntimes.com/
Activists say hunger strike over Chicago school has ended - Yahoo News:


Will Ohio ban pay-to-play school activities? | The Columbus Dispatch

Will Ohio ban pay-to-play school activities? | The Columbus Dispatch:

Will Ohio ban pay-to-play school activities?

Officials seek ways to end extracurricular fees without overburdening districts



Central Ohio has the highest percentage of schools charging pay-to-play fees in the state, according to a 2014 survey. Players at Olentangy Liberty, shown charging onto the field before a home game against Upper Arlington last season, pay an $80 fee.


In his 22 years as a head high-school football coach in Ohio, state Sen. Cliff Hite’s athletes never were required to pay a fee just to join the team. But he saw what happened when a rival did that.
“There were a lot of young kids in Marion (Harding) that couldn’t play football anymore,” the Findlay Republican said. “As the opponent, you sit there and go, ‘Maybe that’s going to be an easy win, but is that what we’re here for?’ I think we should give every kid that opportunity.”
Hite said he plans to convene an informal study committee this fall to discuss what can be done about pay-to-play fees that many say can be detrimental to students and their families.
Over the years, a growing number of Ohio school districts have implemented what’s commonly known as pay-to-play fees that a family must pay in order for a student to participate in extracurricular activities.
A 2014 survey by the Ohio High School Athletic Association found that 46 percent of athletic directors said their schools had some type of pay-to-play fee, up from 42 percent in a 2011 survey. Central Ohio has the highest percentage of schools charging the fees, at 63 percent, while northeastern Ohio has the highest average rates, at $153 per sport or activity.
Hite was drawn into the issue by Secretary of State Jon Husted.
Husted has talked to the OHSAA and legislative leaders about finding bipartisan sponsors for a bill that, he hopes, would one day make Ohio one of the first states in the country to ban pay-to-play fees. He said he’s trying to bring along groups, including school districts, to assure them it’s about helping kids in a way that doesn’t cause schools financial stress.
Extracurricular activities teach leadership, character, teamwork and grit, Husted said, adding that if kids are increasingly growing up in poverty and in broken families, with fewer holding after-school jobs, where do they learn those skills if they aren’t in those activities?
“If we’re going to develop the character of our young people, more of them have to participate in the kind of character-building activities that extracurriculars provide.”
Hite said he expects the committee to study a range of topics related to high-school athletics, including concussions and sudden cardiac arrest. Pay-to-play fees will be a major issue.
“I’m not sure what avenue we’re going to take yet,” Hite said, noting he wants to avoid creating financial burdens on schools.
Fees can vary widely. Columbus, for example, charges no fee for athletics, while New Albany charges $625 per sport.
Factors including limited state funding increases (or cuts), and local levy failures have pushed more districts to charge a pay-to-play fee.
“Schools will often hold athletics as a bargaining chip, and that’s unfortunate,” said Tim Stried, director of information services for the OHSAA, noting that the athletic department budgets are a small percentage of a district’s total operating costs. “We just ask schools to do the best they can in keeping those fees low and offering discounts for multiple sports or within a family."
After a levy failure in 2011 and subsequent $7 million deficit, Westerville schools raised a number of fees for nonacademic clubs, performing arts and athletics. Pay-to-play went from $100 per sport to $240.
Fees generate nearly $600,000 per year for the district, though that Will Ohio ban pay-to-play school activities? | The Columbus Dispatch:

iPads for kids program sets off password security alarms for parents | ZDNet

iPads for kids program sets off password security alarms for parents | ZDNet:

iPads for kids program sets off password security alarms for parents

ANALYSIS/OPINION: An iPads-for-kids program has parents worried about sending kids to school with their child's Apple ID password and the answers to three Apple ID security questions on paper.



ipad kids password security


A U.S. federal digital literacy program providing kids with iPads has asked parents to send kids to school on orientation day with their child's name, Apple ID, password, and the answers to three Apple ID security questions -- on a piece of paper.
As you'd expect, putting this information on paper and providing it to the school program is ringing alarms for some tech-savvy parents.
Right now at Knoxville's Bearden and Carter Middle Schools every student is getting iPad Air 2 tablets with 5GB per month data plans under the Verizon Innovative Learning Schools (VILS) program (with help from Apple and federal nonprofit Digital Promise).
To use the iPads students need Apple IDs, which requires parental consent. Packets were mailed to parents early this month with a double-sided last page consisting of a consent form and an "Apple ID Worksheet" (.pdf) currently linked from the Bearden Middle School website.
It explains, "As part of the process of creating an Apple ID for your student, we will ask you to provide us with the following information: your student's full name, birthdate, password, and the answers to three security questions."
Worried parents talked to Bearden Middle School staff and told ZDNet, "They apologised about the lack of clarity in the forms we were sent, and said that the security portion is only to expedite the Apple ID setup process, which is going to happen in homeroom orientation. They wanted kids to have their answers ready."
Parents who followed up with the school also discovered another detail not made clear in the packet: While signing the Apple ID consent form is required for program participation, providing their child's password and security questions on paper is not.
A school rep told ZDNet via email, "Password and personal information will reside with parents of course." Parents we spoke with said they were assured that only one side of the iPads for kids program sets off password security alarms for parents | ZDNet:

Moscow makes the case for school reform | Russia Beyond The Headlines

Moscow makes the case for school reform | Russia Beyond The Headlines:

Moscow makes the case for school reform

Five years into a process to consolidate and redistribute funding to schools, results are being seen, despite protests from parents and experts.





When news came in fall 2012 that School 122 in central Moscow would be merged with another school, parents were up in arms. The school, which is the home of the Moscow Boys Cappella and requires all students to take choir, is one of the few places outside of conservatories where students can do coursework for a special diploma in music. Parents were afraid that the merger would not only result in the loss of the special music curriculum, but that it would “destroy the school’s unique culture,” in the words of one parent, whose daughter was then in the second grade.
The school was slated for consolidation under a controversial reform that began in 2010 and involves merging small or underperforming schools with larger schools primarily to more evenly distribute financial and administrative resources. Under the reform, funding for schools would be distributed on a per capita basis — a move officials said was necessary to accommodate an increase in demand.
“In our very large country, it is essential to ensure maximum equal access to early childhood services, and supplementary education,” said Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, defending the changes, which went into effect Jan. 1, 2011.
Russia experienced a baby boomlet during the economic prosperity of the early 2000s. Russia’s state statistics service, Rosstat, showed a steady increase in births from 2007–2012. In Moscow, 101,000 children were born in 2007. By 2012, that number had risen to more than 134,000. While some schools in the center of Moscow, like School 122, are undersubscribed, schools in the bedroom communities on the edges of the city, where young families moved into newly constructed apartment complexes, are overcrowded.
Parents at Intellectual, a state-run boarding school for gifted students in western Moscow, took to the streets to protest the merger and expansion of their school, which had a student-teacher ratio of two to one. Students from the school took up the cause, writing letters to President Vladimir Putin and Moscow’s mayor and making a short film that was shown on local news portal Moskva24.
Moscow Deputy Mayor Leonid Pechatnikov responded in an interview with Russian daily Kommersant that if the parents wanted to keep that level of staffing, they would have to pay for additional salaries themselves. “We cannot afford to allocate 378,000 rubles ($5,640) per student. Two students for one teacher is, in fact, a system of tutoring. We have a law on universal education, but we do not have the law on universal tutoring,” Pechatnikov said.
The average amount per student spent in Moscow schools today is 63,000 rubles ($940).

In search of excellence

In addition to redistributing funding, the reform’s authors hoped to improve the performance of students on the Unified State Exam (E.G.E.), which is required for graduation from Russian schools, by combining schools with weaker academics with stronger ones.
Boris Kagarlitsky, a political scientist and the director of the Institute of Globalization and Social Movements, said that this second goal is at odds with the first one.
“In Soviet times, they sought to reduce class sizes so that the teacher could work with each student. Now per capita funding encourages schools to fill classrooms as much as possible, with fewer teachers,” Kagarlitsky said.
But other experts disagree with Kagarlitsky. Isak Frumin, a researcher at the Institute of Education of the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, said that forcing smaller schools to merge with larger ones will give more students access to high-quality education.
“There are several schools where the competition was dozens of people for one place, but now they were given additional space by combining with other schools and now they take more children. Opportunities to send a child to a good school have increased,” Frumin said.
Writing in a blog on the website of independent radio station Ekho Moskvy, local lawmaker Irina Kurash said that it is clear that the school reform has been a success — parents no longer have to “run around Moscow” in search of a good school and teacher salaries have increased as administrative costs were lowered, she wrote. Additionally, she noted, 13 schools in Moscow made it into the listing of the top 25 schools in Russia.
“Moscow finally has a fair system of financing educational institutions. Now funding decisions are based on standards and not the status of the school,” Kurash wrote. Previously school funding depended in part on the school’s designation, if it was classified as an ordinary school or had a title that indicated a special curriculum, such as “gymnasium.”

Out of options

Frumin said that no matter what experts and parents think of the reforms, they are necessary. This year, the number of children entering school in Russia has increased by 560,000 over last year, and the number is only going to continue to rise at least for the near future.
“In the next few years, we will need between 1 and 2 million new places,” Frumin said. “Either the number of children who will study in a second shift will increase, or we should put new school buildings into operation. This is a serious problem for the entire country; we are talking about hundreds of billions of rubles. The money has not been fully allocated for it.”
Over the past four years, 4,000 schools in Moscow have been combined into 692 larger institutions — including Intellectual, which merged with Gymnasium 1588, and School 122, which was united along with a kindergarten and a school with an intensive German-language program, with School 1234, an English-intensive school with a reputation for strong academics.

Results?

After the merger, the students remained in the same building and the music curriculum continued, but School 1234 brought in a new administration and some new teaching staff in the academic subjects in the upper school. The crumbling entryway and concert hall of the school’s 1930s building were remodeled and a new playground was installed. Now, two years later, the graduates of combined School 1234 scored so well on the E.G.E. that the school is now ranked 57th out of all schools in Moscow. After years of struggling to attract new
students, the arts division introduced a first-grade class of 21 students at the opening bell
ceremony on Sept. 1 and the school choirs held a concert as part of Moscow’s official City Day celebrations on Sept. 5.
“Things have changed for the better, and many of our fears were not realized,” said one parent with two children at the school, who declined to give his name.
According to a poll conducted by the Public Opinion Foundation (FOM) in July, his views are shared by only 15 percent of parents; 
42 percent of Russian parents believe the consolidation of schools is wrong. But for nearly half of those who responded, the jury is still out — 43 percent of respondents told the pollsters the question was too difficult to answer.

http://rbth.com/society/2015/09/21/moscow_makes_the_case_for_school_reform_49279.html)




Why Aren't Democratic Presidential Contenders Talking About K-12 Policy? - Politics K-12 - Education Week

Why Aren't Democratic Presidential Contenders Talking About K-12 Policy? - Politics K-12 - Education Week:

Why Aren't Democratic Presidential Contenders Talking About K-12 Policy?




Former U.S. Secretary of State and White House contender Hillary Clinton has proposals to eliminate college-debt and expand universal pre-kindergarten. And two of her rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, and former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, have also put out far-reaching proposals for significantly boosting access to higher education.
Edu-experts have picked apart and prodded at the higher-ed plans, and even Josh Earnest, a White House spokesman, said it would good for the country to have a "robust debate" on college access. 
Missing from all this discussion of the bookends of education? Any sort of comprehensive proposal, from any of the leading Democratic candidates, on how they would like to reshape K-12 policy. 
To be sure, Clinton gave a general thumbs-up to a bipartisan bill to rewrite the Elementary and Secondary Education Act that passed the Senate with big support from both sides of the aisle earlier this year. And as a member of the Senate and the education committee, Sanders not only endorsed the bill, he actually voted for it. O'Malley, meanwhile, has touted his K-12 record in Maryland. (More on whether he, or any of the other governors-turned-presidential-candidates, can legitimately claim credit for edu-outcomes in their states here.) 
There's been more chatter about K-12 among the nearly dozen Republican candidates, but much of it has been about the Common Core State Standards, which former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush hastaken a lot of abuse for supporting. (So far, the other common core fan in the field, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, hasn't been subjected to the same ribbing from his rivals.)
And GOP contenders have talked about teachers' unions, with Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin pledging to rein them in big time, and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie proclaiming he'd like to give them a big punch in the face. Other contenders, including Sens. Marco Rubio, Raul Paul, and Ted Cruz, have said they'd like to slim down, or get rid of the U.S. Department of Education. (No point-by-point plans on K-12 from anyone running for the GOP nod yet, though.) 
So what's going on with the Democrats? I asked some experts:
Patrick McGuinn, a professor of political science at Drew University, in Madison, N.J., who has studied K-12 education and elections, gave me three possibilities. One, Democrats are staying mum in part because Republicans are talking about the issue but in an "ideologically extreme way to appeal to the Tea Party wing of the GOP that dominate[s] the primaries." The GOP contenders are creating "self-inflicted wounds" that will come back to haunt the eventual nominee, according to McGuinn. "No Need for the Dems to say much when the Repubs are making themselves look bad all by themselves!" McGuinn wrote in an email.
Two, he said, K-12 has been a "tricky" issue for Democratic presidential candidates because of the divide between the "reform" wing of the party and teachers' unions on issues like ending teacher tenure and expanding charter schools. It's easier to focus on the areas where most primary voters are in agreeement, like ending student loan debt, McGuinn wrote. 
Finally, this past year has seen a big backlash around the federal role in education and Obama's K-Why Aren't Democratic Presidential Contenders Talking About K-12 Policy? - Politics K-12 - Education Week:

Gov. Cuomo reaches out to teacher unions - NY Daily News

Gov. Cuomo reaches out to teacher unions - NY Daily News:
Gov. Cuomo reaches out to teacher unions




Here is the third item from my "Albany Insider" column from Monday's editions:
Gov. Cuomo’s recent efforts to improve relations with the Democratic party’s left wing seemingly includes the powerful teacher unions with which he’s been warring.
Top Cuomo aide James Malatras recently met in Albany with city teacher union President Michael Mulgrew, officials from the state teachers union, and new state Education Commissioner MaryEllen(CQ) Elia to discuss enacting an appeals process for a tough teacher evaluation system Cuomo pushed through earlier this year, sources said.
Two weeks after the meeting, the state Board of Regents enacted a new appeals process—a move Cuomo publicly supported.
"I think he wants to get this (stuff) behind him without looking like he caved too much,” said one source familiar with the meeting.
A Cuomo aide noted that the education reform package adopted earlier this year included a provision to address anamolies in the teacher evaluation process, which is what was done with the Regents action.

When charter schools run amok - Editorials - Ohio

When charter schools run amok - Editorials - Ohio:

When charter schools run amok




Why have so many charter schools performed poorly across the state? The Ohio Supreme provided insights into the answer in a long-awaited ruling last week. The court majority sided with White Hat Management of Akron, one of the largest private operators of charter schools in the country, in a dispute involving the possession of assets (equipment and supplies) that were purchased initially with public money.
In doing so, the court made plain just how much clout the state legislature, with Republicans in the majority, has ceded to White Hat and other private operators. Writing for a fractured majority, Justice Judith Ann Lanzinger adopted a reluctant tone, concluding the court was ruling “narrowly” and all but ordering the legislature to take the responsible path of providing fitting requirements and oversight.
Lawmakers have a prime opportunity. The state Senate has approved strong legislation to hold charter schools more accountable. Unfortunately, the bill has stalled in the House. The court ruling provides a compelling reason to move quickly to enactment.
The dispute stems from the board decisions of 10 former Hope academies and Life Skills Centers to part with White Hat and find a new management company. White Hat argued the boards would need to move, and if they wanted to take the equipment and supplies, they would have to purchase them from White Hat. This seemed an audacious request. Public money flowed to White Hat so it could buy the materials to operate the school. Now the public entity must pay again to get them back?
Justice Lanzinger reluctantly answered yes. Her opinion explains that such were the terms of the contract reached between the boards and the private operator. The law simply does not define the requirements of the operators or the parameters of contracts in any adequate way. Lanzinger pointed to the “laissez-faire attitude” adopted by lawmakers toward charter schools.
Looking for an indicator of how much sway White Hat and others have at the Statehouse, their political money a conspicuous presence? They arranged for the public to pay twice.
Hard not to appreciate the outrage voiced by Justices William O’Neill and Paul Pfeifer, in their separate dissents. O’Neill essentially reminds that White Hat has not fulfilled its side of the contract, failing to turn the public money into a quality education. Pfeifer argues that the contract is so one-sided and unfair “as to be unconscionable.” He concludes, not unreasonably, that the court should refuse to enforce it.
There is one saving element among the opinions. Justice Lanzinger holds for a majority that a private operator has a “fiduciary relationship” with the charter school it runs. Thus, in performing a government function, the operator has a first obligation to serve the public interest. In that way, the door is open to sufficient transparency, regulation and oversight of all charter schools. Of course, that must come in legislation. How long before the House acts to address this embarrassment, charter schools run amok in Ohio?

Sunday, September 20, 2015

What A Time To Be Alive [The Secret Sauce] | The Jose Vilson

What A Time To Be Alive [The Secret Sauce] | The Jose Vilson:

What A Time To Be Alive [The Secret Sauce]


June 20, 2015 -- ATLANTA --  Drake makes a surprise appearance Future at Birthday Bash 20.   (Akili-Casundria Ramsess/Special to the AJC)


For those of you who missed it, I had two separate, equally potent interviews with both the Wall Street Journal and Slate. I didn’t expect them to come out in the same week, but here’s a couple of excerpts. First, I was asked to debate / converse with National Center for Teaching Quality’s Kate Walsh and The New Teacher Project’s Daniel Weisberg. I have little respect for Walsh’s rep because it behooves her to see this country’s teachers as failing. She practically speaks herself into necessity. I barely knew Weisberg, but, even in places where we merged, I still couldn’t shake off the feeling that he’s compartmentalizing the job in all the wrong ways. Here’s my excerpt:
“Teacher prep in pedagogy is critical in this discussion. It is less about “rigor,” but about the ways in which we connect what new teachers are learning in their colleges of education and what’s happening at their own school. Teachers often say they’re not ready for a particular challenge not because they don’t know the material, but because schools are different from building to building, staff to staff, 
What A Time To Be Alive [The Secret Sauce] | The Jose Vilson:

STEVE JOBS WIDOW FUNDS $50 MILLION XQ: THE SUPER SCHOOL PROJECT - Perdaily.com

STEVE JOBS WIDOW FUNDS $50 MILLION XQ: THE SUPER SCHOOL PROJECT - Perdaily.com:

STEVE JOBS WIDOW FUNDS $50 MILLION XQ: THE SUPER SCHOOL PROJECT



Lauren Powell Jobs.jpg


(Mensaje se repite en Español)

Does Steve Jobs widow Lauren Powell Jobs really need to spend $50 million to reinvent our public schools or do we just have to eliminate the endemic corruption of public education that puts corporate profit and gimmickry ahead of tried and true pedogogic methods from the past that have systematically been removed or sabotaged in order to keep poor students of color in their place with a non-public education system expressedly designed to accomplish this regrettable goal.

One need only look at an LAUSD of the 1950s and 1960s to find the successful model of academic and trade oriented public education that was subsequently systematically dismantled. So now, rather than address what was done to create the dropout failure factories that the vast majority of LAUSD schools have become, we are told to concentrate on the effects of this programmed failure, as if to do so will somehow make a better public education system.

While smaller classes might be nice, successful LAUSD public schools in the past and many public schools around the world today have large class sizes. This in and of itself is not the problem. Rather, the problem is the lack of homogeneity of the 40 students sitting in the class that have consistently been socially promoted without the requisite prior grade-level standards necessary to be engaged no matter how many students are in the class.

Referring to teachers teaching as "droning lectures" or attacking "dry textbooks" uses pejorative language to cover up the real impediment to student learning: The vast majority of students have been purposefully socially promoted STEVE JOBS WIDOW FUNDS $50 MILLION XQ: THE SUPER SCHOOL PROJECT - Perdaily.com:

CURMUDGUCATION: Hillary's Education Plan

CURMUDGUCATION: Hillary's Education Plan:

Hillary's Education Plan





So, the Clinton campaign is starting to feel a little stress. This was in an e-mail from Robby Mook, the campaign manager:

Friend --

The Republican candidates for president are all over the place, but they do agree on one thing: They know that Hillary would be the strongest Democratic candidate, so they’ll say, do, and spend whatever it takes to bring down this campaign.

Karl Rove’s super PAC just released a vicious attack ad that spreads lies about Hillary’s emails, and they’re putting it out in New Hampshire. They know the polls are tight there, and that this is their best play to try to make sure they don’t have to face Hillary in the general election.


And this evening, the twitterverse is afraid that the NEA is going to make an early endorsement for Clinton. So here's the question again-- is Clinton a candidate that those of us who support public education can live with?

There are plenty of things to discuss, but let's focus, for a second, on Hillary believes that every child, no matter his or her race, income, or ZIP code, should be guaranteed a high-quality education. 

That could mean any damn thing. It could mean that she supports building charter schools on every corner and shipping every poor child out of her own neighborhood to attend them. And it doesn't 
CURMUDGUCATION: Hillary's Education Plan:

Why is Washington State Attorney General Robert Ferguson sticking his neck out for charter schools? | Seattle Education

Why is Washington State Attorney General Robert Ferguson sticking his neck out for charter schools? | Seattle Education:

Why is Washington State Attorney General Robert Ferguson sticking his neck out for charter schools?



In politics, actions are everything. That’s why it’s especially interesting Attorney General Bob Ferguson has decided to defend charter schools AFTER they were ruled unconstitutional by the Washington State Supreme Court.
Here’s the twist: before the Supreme Court made their surprise ruling, many opponents of the charter school Initiative 1240 predicted the law was unconstitutional. The basis of their argument was that charters did not qualify as “common schools” because they weren’t under the supervision of an elected body. Because these schools were not common, they should not have access to public funds.
Currently the Washington State Legislature is being held in contempt by the Supreme Court for not fully funding public education in the state of Washington. This was just as true in 2012, when the voters narrowly approved Initiative 1240.
After Initiative 1240 squeaked to victory with 50.69% of the vote, both the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Randy Dorn, and the newly elected Attorney General, Bob Ferguson, decided not to challenge its constitutional standing.
This voter approved initiative opened the gates for public education funding to be channeled to private organizations without public oversight — essentially denying even Why is Washington State Attorney General Robert Ferguson sticking his neck out for charter schools? | Seattle Education: