Latest News and Comment from Education

Monday, February 16, 2015

A valuable school and principal — but you wouldn’t know it by the test scores - The Washington Post

A valuable school and principal — but you wouldn’t know it by the test scores - The Washington Post:



A valuable school and principal — but you wouldn’t know it by the test scores


If you’ve never heard of HONY, or the Humans of New York project, this post will introduce you to it, and its relevance to school reform. The author of the post, Barnett Berry, tells the story of a wonderful school (highlighted in a HONY piece) that is embraced by its community but, unfortunately, doesn’t shine when it comes to standardized test scores. Berry is the founder, partner and chief executive officer at the Center for Teaching Quality,  a national nonprofit organization that helps teachers transform their profession.

By Barnett Berry
Blogger and photojournalist Brandon Stanton roams the streets of the Big Apple, drawing out the stories of strangers he encounters. Snapping poignant photos, he invites subjects to reflect on relationships’ ups and downs, the trajectories of their dreams and struggles, or the minutiae of everyday life.
Millions follow Brandon’s daily Humans of New York (HONY) posts on social media, appreciative of his keen recognition of the moving moment or distinguishing detail.
On January 19, Brandon interviewed a young boy in the Brownsville neighborhood:
Brandon: Who’s influenced you the most in your life?
Vidal: My principal, Ms. Lopez.
Brandon: How has she influenced you?
Vidal: When we get in trouble, she doesn’t suspend us. She calls us to her office and explains to us how society was built down around us. And she tells us that each time somebody fails out of school, a new jail cell gets built. And one time she made every student stand up, one at a time, and she told each one of us that we matter.
Vidal’s account of his relationship with his principal garnered thousands of likes, comments, and shares—and quickly. The social media post “took off” A valuable school and principal — but you wouldn’t know it by the test scores - The Washington Post

Tell Your Representative: Get ESEA Right for All Students!

Important Action in Congress Right Now « Education Votes:



Important Action in Congress Right Now

 

equity-image (1)

Tell Your Representative: Get ESEA Right
for All Students!

It has now been 13 years since No Child Left Behind passed, and it’s clear that this law has failed our kids. The focus in education has shifted from student learning towards testing, labeling, and punishing schools—with no significant progress in closing of opportunity gaps.
Right now, Congress is reauthorizing this cornerstone piece of education legislation – and they need to hear the voice of educators and parents across the country!

We can’t afford for Congress to get this wrong again. That’s why we need your help right now!

Tell Congress to pass an education bill that allows students to learn rather than focus on high-stakes standardized tests, and that ensures every child has the resources – like advanced courses, extracurriculars, and access to school counselors – to succeed.

Contact your representatives now — start by entering your ZIP code:Important Action in Congress Right Now « Education Votes:

ESEA Petition for Education Researchers: Sign Now

Open Letter to Congress and the Obama Administration from Educational Researchers Nationwide:



Open Letter to Congress and the Obama Administration from Educational Researchers Nationwide



_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Dear Members of Congress and the Obama Administration:

We are researchers and professors in colleges, universities, and other research institutions throughout the United States with scholarly and practical expertise in public education, including education policy, school reform, teaching and learning, assessment, and educational equity. As Congress revises and reauthorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, we strongly urge departing from test-focused reforms that not only have been discredited for high-stakes decisions, but also have shown to widen, not close, gaps and inequities. The current reauthorization provides an historic opportunity to leverage federal resources to address the deeper and more systemic problems with strategies that research has compellingly demonstrated to be far more effective in improving the educational opportunities and success of all students, particularly those in highest need. Specifically, we write to endorse the concerns, analyses, and recommendations in the recently released policy memo from the National Education Policy Center, “Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act: Time to Move Beyond Test-focused Policies,” which is available online at http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/esea.

[the full memo will appear here in the final letter for distribution]



The following researchers endorse the NEPC memo, as of February 16, 2015. Affiliations are listed for identification purposes only. The signature list on this page will be updated daily. Your name will not appear immediately upon signing on. Total number of signers to date: 1207

Contact Person: Kevin Kumashiro, Dean, University of San Francisco School of Education, kkumashiro@usfca.edu



Open Letter to Congress and the Obama Administration from Educational Researchers Nationwide:

Teacher, You Live in Two Worlds

Teacher, You Live in Two Worlds:

TEACHER, YOU LIVE IN TWO WORLDS
FEBRUARY 15, 2015 BRETT DICKERSON


teachers rally capitol contest
Teachers, parents, and administrators make an unusual foray into the world of the contest March, 2014 with this huge rally at the Oklahoma State Capitol.


We teachers live in two worlds: One is of collaboration and democracy. The other is of contest and domination.

We’ve done well with that first world, the one of collaboration. It’s that second one of the contest and mental brutality of eliminating the competition that we have a hard time swallowing.
But, if the profession is going to survive the next ten years and beyond, we have to learn to successfully operate in both worlds. We will have to become comfortable transiting between the two. Our lives will be lived in that intersection.

Collaboration

When I first started teaching I believed that teaching was telling and that any interruption to that had to be conquered.  It’s the same approach that corporate charters take now with their hyper-strict behavior rules and students walking lines in the hallway that is not very much different from prisons.
But I changed over time. I learned what those experienced teachers tried to tell me at first: Teaching is collaboration — not just with other teachers, but with your own students.
What experience teaches any teacher that lasts longer than five years is that the more input that students have, the better they do.The more say that they have in how the classroom works the better. It’s an environment that they must inhabit, but may not choose to inhabit if they had the choice.
Teachers who have been teaching for over one year understand thatall students in the building are affected by all of the teachers. The notion of having one or two teachers paid more that the others for some “performance” measure seems ridiculous.
What experienced teachers know is that parents can be great allies and collaborators. But not only that, they are collaborators if their children are successful.
The case of one forlorn student with a horrible home life being rescued by a heroic teacher is very often smoke on the part of Teacher, You Live in Two Worlds:


Sorting the Big Standardized Tests | Peter Greene

Sorting the Big Standardized Tests | Peter Greene:



Sorting the Big Standardized Tests




Since the beginnings of the current wave of test-driven accountability, reformsters have been excited about stack ranking -- the process of sorting out items from the very best to the very worst (and then taking a chainsaw to the very worst).
This has been one of the major supporting points for continued large-scale standardized testing -- if we didn't have test results, how would we compare students to other students, teachers to other teachers, schools to other schools. The devotion to sorting has been foundational, rarely explained but generally presented as an article of faith, a self-evident value -- well, of course, we want to compare and sort schools and teachers and students!
But you know what we still aren't sorting?
The big standardized tests.
Since last summer the rhetoric to pre-empt the assault on testing has focused on "unnecessary" or "redundant" or even "bad" tests, but we have done nothing to find these tests.
Where is our stack ranking for the tests?
We have two major BSTs -- the PARCC and the SBA. In order to better know how my child is doing (isn't that one of our repeated reasons for testing?), I'd like to know which one of these is a better test. There are other state-level BSTs that we're flinging at our students willy-nilly. Which one of these is the best? Which one is the worst?
I mean, we've worked tirelessly to sort and rank teachers in our efforts to root out the bed ones, because apparently "everybody" knows some teachers are bad. Well, apparently everybody knows some tests are bad, so why aren't we tracking them down, sorting them out, and publishing their low test ratings in the local paper?
We've argued relentlessly that I need to be able to compare my student's reading ability with the reading ability of Chris McNoname in Iowa, so why can't I compare the tests that each one is taking?
I realize that coming up with a metric would be really hard, but so what? We use value-added measures to sort out teachers, and those have been debunked by everyone except people who work for the USED. I think we've established that the sorting instrument doesn't have to be good or even valid -- it just has to generate some sort of rating.
So let's get on this. Let's come up with a stack-ranking method for sorting out the SBA and the PARCC and the Keystones and the Indiana Test of Essential Student Swellness and whatever else is out there. If we're going to rate every student and teacher and school, why would we not also rate the raters? And then once we've got the tests rated, we can throw out the bottom ten percent of them. We can offer a "merit bonus" to the company that made the best one (and peanuts to everyone elseSorting the Big Standardized Tests | Peter Greene:

Opinion: Test scoring of schools dismantled in California | The Sacramento Bee The Sacramento Bee

Opinion: Test scoring of schools dismantled in California | The Sacramento Bee The Sacramento Bee:

Opinion: Test scoring of schools dismantled in California

02/15/2015 2:10 PM 
 02/15/2015 10:10 PM

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/dan-walters/article10376744.html#storylink=c



 Slowly, quietly – but unmistakably – California’s education establishment is dismantling or softening state and federal testing-based “accountability” systems that were imposed on public schools more than a decade ago.

Those standards, both the state Academic Performance Index (API) and the federal government’s No Child Left Behind measures, have used testing to gauge how schools were meeting academic achievement standards.
Those that lagged faced financial and managerial sanctions, including, potentially, “parent triggers” to convert failing schools into parent-run charter schools. The accountability measures also fed a drive among some school reformers for grading teachers’ competency.
The education establishment, including administrators, teachers, unions and many district trustees, has never made a secret of its disdain for what’s been termed “punitive accountability,” saying it’s a poor way of encouraging improvement.
The state accountability regime has been suspended, supposedly to be revised and improved. The committee that’s rewriting the API has recommended that it no longer contain a single three-digit number and use “multiple measures” to align it with the new Common Core standards and Gov. Jerry Brown’s Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF).
Policy Analysis for California Education, a school think tank, puts it this way: “The new system is grounded in the concept of reciprocal accountability: that is, every actor in the system – from the Capitol to the classroom – must be responsible for the aspects of educational quality and performance that it controls.”
Meanwhile, for the second straight year, the state is seeking a federal waiver from being graded on results of recently revised academic tests.
Without the precise numbers that both accountability systems generated, however, hard consequences for low achievement also may disappear. The “parent trigger” and other interventions may remain in law, but the data that have driven them could disappear.
Los Angeles Unified at one point flatly proclaimed exemption from parent trigger due to the federal waiver, then reversed itself after a change of superintendents.
Without being explicit, Brown seems to be taking the side of those whoOpinion: Test scoring of schools dismantled in California | The Sacramento Bee The Sacramento Bee:


Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/dan-walters/article10376744.html#storylink=cpy

Publishing Giant Pearson Hauls in Billions in Education Dollars: But Do Students Benefit? | EduBloggers

Publishing Giant Pearson Hauls in Billions in Education Dollars: But Do Students Benefit? | EduBloggers:



Publishing Giant Pearson Hauls in Billions in Education Dollars: But Do Students Benefit?

Professor, activist and education blogger Paul Thomas’ piece first appeared on Alternet –http://www.alternet.org/education/publishing-giant-pearson-hauls-billions-education-dollars-do-students-benefit
Publishing Giant Pearson Hauls in Billions in Education Dollars: But Do Students Benefit?
Leave it to Oscar Wilde to get things right. Writing about late-19th-century British attitudes regarding the poor, the Irish writer and social critic concluded, “Their remedies are part of the disease.”
Oh, how far we have not come.
With an extensive and carefully detailed examination of the British publishing giant Pearson, published by Politico last week, Stephanie Simon has drawn a similar conclusion about the state of American education: “The story of Pearson’s rise,” Simon writes, “is very much a story about America’s obsession with education reform over the past few decades.” In short, our obsession with “accountability” at all costs has given birth to an industry that, while feeding on taxpayer dollars, corrupts the very thing it (erroneously) seeks to measure: learning. As with Wilde’s poor, here, too, it is self-evident: our remedies have become part of our disease.
Pearson has clearly profited from the post-No Child Left Behind era, bolstered by the more recent Common Core movement: “Half its $8 billion in annual global sales comes from its North American education division,” Simon reveals. But what gains have Americans reaped in return? According to Simon, relatively few. “Pearson’s dominance,” she writes, “does not always serve U.S. students or taxpayers well.”
Simon’s disturbing expose of corporate gain on the backs of taxpayer dollars is a most welcome addition to the efforts currently being made to beat back the corporatization of education—many of them led by educational researchers and teachers. It is essential reading for anyone concerned with the current state of education. But its appearance also raises a critical question: Why has it taken so long for the media to take note? Scholars and teachers have been warning of this for years.
Writing in 2007, professors Sharon L. Nichols, University of Texas-San Antonio, and David C. Berliner, Arizona State University, shared a detailed account of the unintended consequences of high-stakes testing, highlighting Campbell’s Law, itself a caution about statistics from 1975:
Campbell’s law stipulates that “the more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.”…
High-stakes testing is exactly the kind of practice Campbell warned us about….
Our literature search has turned up endless examples showing how high-stakes testing corrupts education.
On AlterNet two years ago, I connected those concerns to Common Core, asking:
Who advocates for CCSS? What claims drive that advocacy? And who stands to benefit from CCSS implementation as well as the connected tests?…
With the poor track record associated with standards-based reform, that raises another important question Publishing Giant Pearson Hauls in Billions in Education Dollars: But Do Students Benefit? | EduBloggers:

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Accountability? Testing Disclaimers for ALL! | Reclaim Reform

Accountability? Testing Disclaimers for ALL! | Reclaim Reform:



Accountability? Testing Disclaimers for ALL!

Student, teacher and school accountability are absurd if the testing corporations are not held accountable.
Angry child
This is the actual CCSS disclaimer:
“THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS ARE PROVIDED AS-IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS, AND NGA CENTER/CCSSO MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTIBILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NONINFRINGEMENT, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT DISCOVERABLE.”
Our children, our schools, and our children’s teachers are rated by high stakes testing companies with these disclosures. View the actual CCSS disclaimer page HERE.
-
Angry child2If this corporation and the corporations of other high stakes testing companies can get away with this and remain in their multi-billion dollar businesses and government contracts, our children should also have legal disclaimers holding them unaccountable. The same goes for teachers and schools. Otherwise, the insanity and greed of the high stakes testing frenzy will continue and destroy any possibility of real educational growth for our children.
Well, declare that this obscene power grab calling itself “education reform” must stop with our children. Our children are not guinea pigs, data feeders, or things. Our children are children who need our protection from the child abuse which is corporate high stakes testing – high stakes testing in all of its brand names.
How can you legally refuse these tests? Read HERE for UnitedOptOut information.

Teachers often missing from debate over school reform | Dallas Morning News

Teachers often missing from debate over school reform | Dallas Morning News:



Teachers often missing from debate over school reform



The debate over improving public schools too often leaves out the people who teach in the classroom, Alfonso Correa said.
Correa teaches AP English and composition at Dallas’ School for the Talented and Gifted at Yvonne A. Ewell Townview Center in Oak Cliff. A magnet school, TAG is consistently rated among the top public high schools in the nation.
“A lot of these discussions about policies and education reform almost always exclude teachers,” Correa said. “Over the last five to 10 years, this huge reform movement has focused on standardization and data.”
Correa, 46, wants to shift attention back to teachers.
“Instruction” he said, “is for putting together a piece of furniture. Teaching is a far more complex concept that no business model can approach.”
He will speak at the Dallas Festival of Ideas on Feb. 27-28 in the Arts District.
Correa recalled attending the Aspen Ideas Festival in 2007 and watching another education reform panel made up of two Bush administration officials, along with the father of Bill Gates.
“I remember sitting in the audience feeling aghast,” he said. “They were talking in a vacuum about education. They had no perspective about what happens in the classroom. It was totally abstract.”
Classrooms aren’t an abstraction and teachers don’t work in a vacuum, Correa said. They have to connect with their students, and that happens by understanding them.
In the Dallas school district, where nearly 70 percent of the students are Hispanic and many come from new immigrant families, Correa’s background helps him in the classroom.
He grew up in Brownsville and as a first-generation Mexican-American, he spoke English and Spanish. His mother was from the state of Guanajuato in central Mexico, and she raised him with help from his aunt and grandmother.
“The border was nothing at all like it is now,” Correa said. “You could go back and forth easily.”
He still remembers his band teacher as a role model. “I definitely see his no-nonsense style in my approach,” Correa said. “He got great results with a ragtag bunch that turned the band program around into a well-respected, fearsome group.”
Ranked in the top 5 percent of his high school class, Correa wanted to attend the University of Texas at Austin. But his family couldn’t afford the tuition, and he had no idea he was eligible for a scholarship. There was a community college in town, but he didn’t want to live at home. He decided to enlist in the military for the education benefits.
He joined the Navy in 1986 and completed his stint in 1990. He spent those four years assigned to the submarine force and spent his shore leave going to museums and other cultural attractions in places such as Hong Kong and Japan.
“I was part of a little group called the ‘Nerd Herd,’” he said. “Our deal was, ‘We’re in the Far East. Are we ever going to be back here? Probably not.’”
Matured by his time in the Navy, he became more serious about going to college. He returned to his hometown and enrolled in the University of Texas at Brownsville, a campus that had just opened.
He majored in English with a minor in history and an eye toward a career in teaching. An English professor left a lasting impact, teaching him that literature was not just about artistry but also about culture and society.
After his 1996 graduation, he thought he had lined up a teaching job in Brownsville. But when it fell through, a friend who knew someone in the personnel office of the Dallas school district suggested he try there.
As luck would have it, the massive Yvonne A. Ewell Townview Center had opened the year before with six magnet programs, including the School for the Talented and Gifted. Correa got an interview with the late Dr. H.B. Bell, executive principal of the Townview campus, and was offered a position the same day. “It was just this whirlwind thing,” he said.
Correa is now in his 19th year of teaching. He has also taught African-American studies, Latin American studies and Senior Thesis.
He said he was influenced by Louise Cowan, who started the Teachers Academy at the Dallas Institute of Humanities and Culture.
He serves on numerous local and national education committees, including the committee that helps put together questions for the AP English Language and Composition exam. He is also on an advisory board at the Teachers Academy, which runs a summer enrichment class.
He and his wife have three children ages 11, 9 and 4, and his approach to teaching is similar to parenting: Treat each child as an individual.
Even well-intentioned ideas, such as using a best-practices approach to training teachers, are flawed, Correa said.
“The proposition is, all you have to do is observe and talk to really effective teachers and take what they’re doing and teach others to do that thing,” he says. “That’s Teachers often missing from debate over school reform | Dallas Morning News:

LAUSD District 3 race: 5 challengers seek to end Tamar Galatzan’s reign

LAUSD District 3 race: 5 challengers seek to end Tamar Galatzan’s reign:



LAUSD District 3 race: 5 challengers seek to end Tamar Galatzan’s reign


LAUSD candidates for District 3: Elizabeth Badger, Tamar Galatzan, Filiberto Gonzalez, Ankur Patel, Carl Petersen and Scott Schmerelson. 

LAUSD candidates for District 3

Tamar Galatzan
Age: 45
Education: Birmingham High School, salutatorian (1987); Bachelor of Arts in political science, UCLA, magna cum laude (1991); Juris Doctor, University of California, Hastings College of the Law (1994)
Party affiliation: Democrat
Political experience: LAUSD board member, 2007-present
Work experience: deputy city attorney/neighborhood prosecutor (2002-present); Western States associate counsel, Anti-Defamation League (1996-2002)
Family: two sons who attend LAUSD schools
Website: tamar2015.com
Scott Schmerelson
Age: 63
Eduction: Master of Science in education, school administration, Cal State L.A.
Party affiliation: Republican
Political experience: first run for public office
Work experience: more than 35 years as an educator, retired LAUSD principal
Family: Single
Carl Petersen
Age: 47
Education: attended Pace University for computer science and holds a Bachelor of Science in business management from the University of Phoenix
Party affiliation: Democrat
Political experience: first run for public office
Work experience: director of logistics at Arecont Vision, LLC
Family: married with five children, ages 14 to 22
Elizabeth Badger
Age:56
Education: Master of Public Policy and Administration, Cal State Northridge; Bachelor of Arts in political science, Cal State Northridge
Party affiliation: Democrat
Political experience: six terms on the Los Angeles County Democratic Party Central Committee, also a member of the organization’s executive board; ran for L.A. City Council and California State Assembly
Work experience: co-owner of B&B Automotive, founder and chief executive officer of the nonprofit Minority Outreach Committee
Family: married for 14 years, three biological and three stepchildren, the youngest two are in middle school while their older siblings work in banking, the Los Angeles Police Department and U.S. Marine Corps.
Filiberto Gonzalez
Age: 40
Education: Master of Social work, USC; Bachelor of Arts, Cal State Northridge
Party affiliation: Democratic
Political experience: Founded Californians for Safe Schools to organize parents against child abuse in 2012; North Valley Area Planning Commission member from August 2013 to October 2014
Work experience: Served as project director of an early childhood education initiative at United Way of Greater Los Angeles; also served in many management roles at North Valley Caring Services, a community-based nonprofit in North Hills, and chief development officer at Mexican American Opportunity Foundation
Family: married for 10 years; three girls, ages 2, 6 and 8. Two attend local LAUSD school in Chatsworth
Website: gofiliberto.com
Ankur Patel
Age: 29
Education: Master of Science in transportation, Cal State Northridge; Bachelor of Science, UCLA; educated in LAUSD’s San Fernando Valley schools from elementary through high school at North Hollywood High School
Party affiliation: Independent
Political experience: board member, treasurer and budget advocate in the Neighborhood Council System
Work experience: taught English for two years, taught as a graduate assistant at CSUN
Family: single, two younger brothers who also went through LAUSD, immigrant parents from India with strong educational values. Father studied under a street lamp, earned a degree in India and then came to America and earned an engineering degree from CSUN and worked as a rocket scientist in the San Fernando Valley for 30 years.
Website: tellpatel.com
Los Angeles Unified’s primary election in District 3 is shaping up to be a battle of five Davids versus Goliath, after a charter school lobbying group slung its financial clout behind two-term incumbent Tamar Galatzan.
With an independent expenditure of $59,820 earlier this month, the California Charter Schools Association brought Galatzan’s financial backing to $74,125, more than all five of her challengers combined have so far at $52,816, according to campaign finance records.
Galatzan, whose District 3 seat representing the western San Fernando Valley is up for grabs in the March 3 primary, said her support for charter schools has been driven by campus-based educators.
Those educators, she said, are seeking to create either affiliated charters in hopes of alleviating fiscal straits or independent charters, which operate with near autonomy.
“The teachers at the campuses brought the petitions, and I’ve backed those teachers,” Galatzan said of her support for independent charter schools.
But challenger Filiberto Gonzalez said simply approving charter schools is creating a two-tiered system. In one tier are children who are fortunate enough to have parents who secure their seats at charter schools or pay for private education. The remainder, he said, will be left to suffer through LAUSD, a district that has proven too big to give taxpayers “a return on their investment” by educating students.
Gonzalez said he believes schools need more local control. But the way to achieve that lofty goal, he said, is by breaking up the nation’s second-largest school district into smaller, more manageable districts.
While the prospect is nothing new — breaking up LAUSD has been discussed for decades — now is the time to make it happen, and Gonzalez, who grew up in public housing, said he’s the candidate to get it done.
“I think if we’re able to get past the primary, and we’re doing everything we can to do that, we’ll have a very robust debate and discussion about that,” he said.
While Gonzalez has a grass-roots campaign, attending events and meeting voters in neighborhoods with traditionally high turnouts, his campaign coffer has only $2,321.
But it’s not the fewest dollars raised so far. Carl Petersen’s financial support amounts to a mere $1,260. The father of five decided to run after spending two days at LAUSD headquarters fighting with district lawyers for the services two of his children need because they suffer from disorders in the autistic spectrum. While campus-based educators agreed Petersen’s children needed the support, he said, district higher-ups didn’t agree.
“During those two days, I said, ‘Something has to change; parents need a say,’ and I decided I was going to step up and run,” Petersen said.
Petersen also believes the cure to many of LAUSD’s woes is more local control. But rather than break up the district, he said, LAUSD needs to set clear expectations and let educators decide how they’re best achieved.
“You have to let teachers do their thing. They’re professionals; that’s why we hired them,” said Petersen, who heads up logistics for a company that manufactures surveillance cameras. Accountability for educators has proven a contentious issue in the district, as former Superintendent John Deasy’s efforts to measure performance were staunchly opposed by the teachers union.
Candidate Ankur Patel, a former English teacher of two years and previous graduate assistant instructor, wants students to evaluate their educators rather than to rely heavily on test scores.
“The students spend more time with their teachers than anyone else and are in the best position to assess their educational experience,” Patel stated on his website.
Patel also wants smaller classes. While LAUSD has sought to reduce class sizes this year using additional state funding, Patel said far more needs to be done. Classrooms across the district are packed with more than 40 students, each of whom represents roughly $10,000 in state funding for a total of some $400,000 per room. Yet the textbooks are old, teachers aren’t paid enough and schools aren’t clean, Patel said.
Patel has more funding under the direct control of his campaign than any other candidate, including Galatzan, at $21,746 — an amount he amassed, in part, by contributing $5,000 to his campaign directly and loaning it another $5,000, according to campaign finance records.
Candidate Scott Schmerelson assembled the second-highest dollar figure directly under campaign control by borrowing $15,000 from himself.
The retired teacher and administrator worked in LAUSD schools for 33 years and carries the endorsements of LAUSD’s administrators union, Associated Administrators of Los Angeles, as well as the California School Employees Association, which represents clerical workers, teachers aids and other classified positions.
And he’s no stranger to troubled schools. When LAUSD wanted to prevent a state takeover of Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Middle School when it was Mount Vernon Middle School, Schmerelson was called in. During his five years as principal, he improved test scores, conditions and morale at the troubled Mid-City campus, according to his website.
Schmerelson wants to increase local control by sending more decision-making power to school site councils, which are campus-based bodies of administrators, teachers and parents. He also wants teachers to evaluate the performance of their peers, as opposed to administrators, and create mentoring systems to support underperforming educators.
“The average teacher has close to 10 years’ experience right now. Why in the world would we move to get rid of struggling teachers without doing everything we can to help them improve instruction,” Schmerelson states on his website.
Rounding out the field of six is Elizabeth Badger. The 55-year-old finished fourth in a field of six running for Los Angeles City Council in 2013. About five months later her bid for a state Assembly seat LAUSD District 3 race: 5 challengers seek to end Tamar Galatzan’s reign:

Opinion: Charter schools don’t belong in new recovery district. They are already bound by ‘perform or close’ mandate | Get Schooled

Opinion: Charter schools don’t belong in new recovery district. They are already bound by ‘perform or close’ mandate | Get Schooled:



Opinion: Charter schools don’t belong in new recovery district. They are already bound by ‘perform or close’ mandate




Dr. Tony Roberts is president & CEO of the Georgia Charter Schools Association. He wrote this essay in response to the governor’s proposed Opportunity School District, a state-run district that would take over low-performing schools.
His point: Charter schools should not be among the schools taken into the special state district because an effective mechanism already exists to monitor and close them.
By Tony Roberts
AJC_3In the AJC article this week, “New plan for failing schools,” a list of 141 “persistently failing schools” is described based on the College and Career Performance Index. The article mentioned:  “Two state-approved charter schools are on the list of low performers as well.”
As a follow-up, AJC reporter Greg Bluestein posted on the AJC political blog that some skeptics of the proposed Opportunity School District were using the argument that the two schools on the list of failing schools already under state oversight—“state charter schools”—were indicative of the kind of job the state would do if charged with taking over schools.
This argument falls apart miserably when the truth about these and other charter schools in Georgia is known.  (For clarification, I am speaking of “traditional, start-up charter schools” approved either by local school districts or the state Charter Schools Commission—not charter systems or college and career academies that are most always under the control of a local school board.)
First, “state charter” school is a misnomer as the state does not own or run charter schools. The state approvescharter schools, as do local school districts, but they are operated independently with their own board of directors and their own staff, budget, curriculum, and their own higher goals of academic achievement to which they are contractually obligated in their charter. (The AJC stated it correctly by describing the schools as “state-approved.”) By “higher,” I mean at least higher either than the average of similar schools in their district or higher than the state average, in some cases.
Second, charter schools that do not live up to the “promises” made in their charter petition are closed after a reasonable period — or should be.  Sometimes this happens by the school’s charter not being renewed at the end of their five-year contract—or even prior to the end if no improvement is in sight. But the result is the same. Charter schools can only exist if they deliver the results they promise or better.
For example, two state-approved charter schools were closed in 2014: Heritage Preparatory Academy in Atlanta and Scholars Academy in Clayton County. The original charter (or contract) term for Heritage did not expire until Opinion: Charter schools don’t belong in new recovery district. They are already bound by ‘perform or close’ mandate | Get Schooled: