Latest News and Comment from Education

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Physical Fitness Test Results for 2011 - Year 2011 (CA Dept of Education)

Physical Fitness Test Results for 2011 - Year 2011 (CA Dept of Education):

Physical Fitness Test Results for 2011 Prompt Schools
Chief Tom Torlakson and NBA All-Star Bill Walton
to Team Up for Healthy Kids Campaign

EL CAJON—With only 31 percent of students posting healthy scores in all six areas of the latest Physical Fitness Test, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson joined NBA all-star Bill Walton today in urging schools across California to take part in the Team California for Healthy Kids campaign.

"Today's results are clear: when only 31 percent of children are physically fit, that's a public health challenge we can't wait to address," Torlakson said. "That's where our Team California for Healthy Kids campaign can make a world of difference, by helping make healthy choices the easy choices, at school and beyond."

Torlakson and Walton discussed the public awareness campaign at a news conference at Grossmont High School in El Cajon, where they also released the results of the state's 2011 Physical Fitness Test.

The 2011 Physical Fitness Test was administered to 1.34 million students representing 93 percent of pupils enrolled in fifth, seventh, and ninth grades (Table 1). New standards have been established for the aerobic capacity and body composition fitness areas. Under the new criteria for aerobic capacity and body composition, these fitness areas are broken down into three categories: (1) In the Healthy Fitness Zone® (HFZ®), (2) Needs Improvement (i.e., not in HFZ®), and (3) Needs Improvement — High Risk (i.e., not in HFZ® — High Risk). In the last four fitness areas of abdominal strength, trunk extensor strength, upper body strength, and flexibility, performance is classified into two general areas: (1) In the HFZ® and (2) Needs Improvement. A score in the HFZ® indicates the student's level of fitness is sufficient for good health.

While aerobic capacity is an indicator of physical fitness, body composition is perhaps the most important indicator of who will develop future health problems. The results show 34.1 percent of grade five students, 30.3 percent of grade seven students, and 25.0 percent of grade nine students are categorized as High Risk (Table 1).

Table 2 provides a bridge for comparisons between the previous year's results with the 2011 data by applying both the 2010 and 2011 standards to the aerobic capacity and body composition scores for those students tested in 2011.

To score in the HFZ®, the test requires, for instance, that a five-foot six-inch, 150-pound, 15-year-old ninth grade male run a mile within nine minutes, perform at least 16 push-ups, and do at least 24 curl-ups. For all six areas of the test:

  • 25.2 percent of fifth-grade students were in the HFZ®, compared to 29 percent in 2010;
  • 32.0 percent of seventh-grade students were in the HFZ®, compared to 35 percent in 2010; and
  • 36.8 percent of ninth-grade students were in the HFZ®, compared to 38.7 percent in 2010 (Tables 3 and 4).

A teacher and longtime high school cross country coach, Torlakson launched the Team California for Healthy Kids effort to engage celebrity athletes, community leaders, public health advocates, parents, teachers, and students in achieving three major goals:

  • Increasing physical activity, especially moderate-to-vigorous physical activity throughout the day, every day, in schools and communities.
  • Increasing access to fresh fruits and vegetables in meals and snacks in early childhood and after-school programs, and in salad bars in schools.
  • Increasing access to drinking water.

Athletes and others involved in the campaign will be visiting schools throughout the state to encourage local efforts to increase physical activity and increase access to water, fresh fruits, and vegetables. Working alongside Walton on the effort as the Team's co-chairs are former NFL star William "Bubba" Paris, ultramarathoner Dean Karnazes, fitness expert Lorrie Sullenberger, and UCLA Professor Toni Yancey, MD, MPH.

Organizers have created a set of online resources and tools available to any school or community organization looking to promote student health and fitness. The campaign's materials are posted on the California Department of Education's Web site at Team California for Healthy Kids - Initiatives & Programs or at the Team California for Healthy Kids site at Team California Home (Outside Source)

The California State Board of Education designated the FITNESSGRAM® in 1996 as the required Physical Fitness Test that local educational agencies administer to students annually in grades five, seven, and nine. State law requires all public schools in California to report these results in their School Accountability Report Cards and provide students with their individual results.

The FITNESSGRAM® was designed by The Cooper Institute to evaluate fitness performance and increase the likelihood students will adopt lifetime patterns of physical activity. The FITNESSGRAM® assesses six fitness areas: (1) aerobic capacity, (2) body composition, (3) abdominal strength, (4) trunk extensor strength, (5) upper body strength, and (6) flexibility.

The 2011 Physical Fitness Test results for schools, school districts, counties, and state are available on the California Department of Education Web site at PFT Results - Physical Fitness Testing (PFT). For information on the Team California for Healthy Kids initiative, please visit Team California for Healthy Kids - Initiatives & Programs.

# # # #

Attachments

2011 Physical Fitness Test Results

Table 1: 2011 Percentage of Grade Five, Seven, and Nine
Students in Healthy Fitness Zone1 (HFZ) by Fitness Areas

Fitness Areas

Number of Grade 5 Students2

Percent of Grade 5 Students in HFZ

Percent of Grade 5 Students Not in HFZ

Percent of Grade 5 Students Not in HFZ –
High Risk3

Number of Grade 7 Students2

Percent of Grade 7 Students in HFZ

Percent of Grade 7 Students Not in HFZ

Percent of Grade 7 Students Not in HFZ –
High Risk3

Number of Grade 9 Students2

Percent of Grade 9 Students in HFZ

Percent of Grade 9 Students Not in HFZ

Percent of Grade 9 Students Not in HFZ –
High Risk3

Aerobic Capacity

454,703

61.4

30.5

8.1

442,543

63.0

25.3

11.7

445,077

61.7

25.5

12.8

Body Composition

454,703

52.1

13.8

34.1

442,543

55.5

14.2

30.3

445,077

59.4

15.6

25.0

Abdominal Strength

454,703

78.8

21.2

N/A

442,543

85.1

14.9

N/A

445,077

87.2

12.8

N/A

Trunk Extensor Strength

454,703

87.4

12.6

N/A

442,543

90.2

9.8

N/A

445,077

92.0

8.0

N/A

Upper Body Strength

454,703

69.0

31.0

N/A

442,543

72.1

27.9

N/A

445,077

77.4

22.6

N/A

Flexibility

454,703

70.9

29.1

N/A

442,543

79.1

20.9

N/A

445,077

83.7

16.3

N/A

1 Healthy Fitness Zone® is a registered trademark of The Cooper Institute.
2 Includes partially tested students.
3 Aerobic Capacity and Body Composition fitness areas have added a new standard category for 2011, Not in HFZ - High Risk (Needs Improvement – High Risk). Students in this area have the potential for future health problems. The need for increased activity and eating a healthy controlled diet is more urgent for students in this category than those students in the Not in HFZ (Needs Improvement) category. High-risk category does not exist for fitness areas that are denoted as N/A (not applicable). New standards applied to Aerobic Capacity and Body Composition fitness areas are located on the California Department of Education (CDE) Physical Fitness Test Program Resources Web page at Program Resources - Physical Fitness Testing (PFT).

Back to top

Table 2: 2011 and 2010 Comparison of Results
for Grades Five, Seven, and Nine Students

Physical Fitness
Test Areas

Percent of 2011 Grade 5 Students in HFZ1Applying 2010 Standards3

Percent of 2011 Grade 5 Students in HFZ1Applying 2011 Standards4

Percent Change 2011 – 2010 Standards

Percent of 2011 Grade 7 Students in HFZ1Applying 2010 Standards3

Percent of 2011 Grade 7 Students in HFZ1Applying 2011 Standards4

Percent Change 2011 – 2010 Standards

Percent of 2011 Grade 9 Students in HFZ1Applying 2010 Standards3

Percent of 2011 Grade 9 Students in HFZ1Applying 2011 Standards4

Percent Change 2011 – 2010 Standards

Aerobic Capacity

64.7

61.4

-3.3

65.9

63.0

-2.9

61.1

61.7

0.6

Body Composition

70.2

52.1

-18.1

69.7

55.5

-14.2

72.4

59.4

-13.0

1 This table provides a comparison of the 2011 administration results using both the 2010 and 2011 standards. New standards applied to Aerobic Capacity and Body Composition fitness areas are located on the CDE Physical Fitness Test Program Resources Web page at Program Resources - Physical Fitness Testing (PFT).
2 Healthy Fitness Zone® is a registered trademark of The Cooper Institute.
3 Results using 2010 HFZ Standards.
4 Results using 2011 HFZ Standards.

Explanation of table contents: Line 1 shows the percentage of students in grades five, seven, and nine in 2010–11 who scored in the HFZ for the Aerobic Capacity fitness area applying both 2009–10 and the 2010–11 standards. Line 2 shows the percentage of students who scored in the HFZ for the Body Composition fitness area after applying both the 2009–10 and the 2010–11 standards. Approximately 61.4 percent of the grade 5 students, who were tested in 2010–11 scored in the HFZ. To allow for comparison to previous years these same students' aerobic capacity scores were scored with the 2009–10 standards, resulting in 64.7 percent of the students scoring in the HFZ. Approximately 59.4 percent of the grade nine students scored in the HFZ for body composition, if the 2009–10 standards were applied to these same students 72.4 percent would have scored in the HFZ.

Back to top

Table 3: 2011 Percentage of Grade Five, Seven, and Nine Students
Number of Fitness Areas in the Healthy Fitness Zone1 (HFZ)

Number of Fitness Areas in the Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)2

Number of Grade 5 Students3

Percent of Grade 5 Students in HFZ

Cumulative Percent of Grade 5 Students in HFZ4

Number of Grade 7 Students3

Percent of Grade 7 Students in HFZ

Cumulative Percent of Grade 7 Students in HFZ4

Number of Grade 9 Students3

Percent of Grade 9 Students in HFZ

Cumulative Percent of Grade 9 Students in HFZ4

6 of 6

114,690

25.2

25.2

141,813

32.0

32.0

163,795

36.8

36.8

5 of 6

105,641

23.2

48.4

101,113

22.8

54.8

100,478

22.6

59.4

4 of 6

91,855

20.2

68.6

85,979

19.4

74.2

85,969

19.3

78.7

3 of 6

70,424

15.5

84.1

61,936

14.0

88.2

54,099

12.2

90.9

2 of 6

45,749

10.1

94.2

34,604

7.8

96.0

26,073

5.9

96.8

1 of 6

21,415

4.7

98.9

13,892

3.1

99.1

10,846

2.4

99.2

0 of 6

4,929

1.1

100.0

3,206

0.7

99.8

3,817

0.9

100.0

Total Tested

454,703

N/A5

N/A5

442,543

N/A5

N/A5

445,077

N/A5

N/A5

1 Healthy Fitness Zone® is a registered trademark of The Cooper Institute.
2 New standards applied to aerobic capacity and body composition fitness areas are located on the CDE Physical Fitness Test Program Resources Web page at Program Resources - Physical Fitness Testing (PFT).
3 Includes partially tested students.
4 Column percents may not add to 100 percent due to rounding.
5 N/A means not applicable.

Back to top

Table 4: Percentage of Grade Five, Seven, and Nine Students
in Healthy Fitness Zone1 (HFZ) for 6-Out-of-6 Fitness Areas

Grade

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

20112

Percent Change 2011 to 2006

Percent Change 2011 to 2010

Grade 5

25.6

27.1

28.5

29.2

29.0

25.2

-0.4

-3.8

Grade 7

29.6

30.9

32.9

34.2

35.0

32.0

2.4

-3.0

Grade 9

27.4

30.1

35.6

37.9

38.7

36.8

9.4

-1.9

1 Healthy Fitness Zone® is a registered trademark of The Cooper Institute.
2 New standards applied to aerobic capacity and body composition fitness areas are located on the CDE Physical Fitness Test Program Resources Web page at Program Resources - Physical Fitness Testing (PFT).

Back to top

# # # #

Tom Torlakson — State Superintendent of Public Instruction


Communications Division, Room 5206, 916-319-0818, Fax 916-319-0100

Our Students Deserve No Less | ED.gov Blog

Our Students Deserve No Less | ED.gov Blog:

Our Students Deserve No Less

(Official Department of Education Photo by Joshua Hoover)

“My chief message today is a sobering one,” said Secretary Duncan yesterday at the annual Federal Student Aid conference in Las Vegas, Nev. “I want to ask you, and the entire higher education community, to look ahead and start thinking more creatively—and with much greater urgency—about how to contain the spiraling costs of college and reduce the burden of student debt on our nation’s students.”

Duncan called for a national conversation on the issue, and noted that containing the cost of college and student debt will always be some of the most controversial and thankless work in all of higher education. He went on to explain that:

With higher productivity and better accountability, institutions of higher education can boost both quality and access and constrain costs, all at the same time. In the era of the knowledge economy, the urgency of controlling college costs is not at odds with the urgency of increasing college attainment. Both goals are necessary if society is to do all it can to help more Americans succeed and thrive in the global job market.

Duncan acknowledged that for too many students and families that the cost of college is a serious and growing problem. He pointed out the Obama Administration’s unprecedented commitment to helping students pay off their student debt, including the recently announced Pay As You Earn proposal to help make student loan debt more manageable. “All told, federal support for increased college access has expanded more in the last three years than at any period since the years following the passage of the GI bill,” the Secretary said.

To those in attendance at the conference, Secretary Duncan called for creativity and a commitment to help contain the growth of college costs and student debt. “Our students deserve no less,” he said.

Click here to read the entire speech.

POVERTY DEFEATS EVEN CHARTER SCHOOLS « Teachers Fight Back

POVERTY DEFEATS EVEN CHARTER SCHOOLS « Teachers Fight Back:

POVERTY DEFEATS EVEN CHARTER SCHOOLS

Today’s Chicago Tribune has an article about how research has suggested that many charter schools in Chicago are performing no better than traditional neighborhood schools and some are actually doing much worse. The article shows the test scores to back up the research that was done.

Does this really surprise anyone? What is so difficult to understand about the fact that children from poverty-stricken areas will almost always do worse than their peers from non poverty areas? Yes, there are some charter schools in poor neighborhoods that have had great success, but I doubt even those have their students testing on a par with their middle class and affluent peers.

What really irritates me about so many education reformers is their idea that we could lift up the children of poverty if only the teachers were better, or the methods were innovative, or the curriculum was changed, or we had merit pay, or longer school days, and on and on.

We have had decades of reform and changes and innovations, and yet very little has changed in our schools that

tomhayden.com - Peace Exchange Bulletin - The Morning After #OWS

tomhayden.com - Peace Exchange Bulletin - The Morning After:

THE MORNING AFTER

Last night’s LAPD raid is a tough story to convey. Polar opposite views of the same reality.

It was not a case of LAPD brutality or excessive force – not compared to LA’s past experiences, nor compared to New York, Oakland, Berkeley, etc. The reason for police restraint was the cumulative impact of many years of struggle for police reform. From the street perspective, however, it was a massive case of overkill and intimidation which took great bravery to withstand.

In some instances, peaceful demonstrators were literally run over by packs of police. A few people were shot with bean bags because they were occupying a tree house. The encampment itself was

Politicians shocked by pension abuse. But not the abuse you’re thinking of. « Fred Klonsky

Politicians shocked by pension abuse. But not the abuse you’re thinking of. « Fred Klonsky:

Politicians shocked by pension abuse. But not the abuse you’re thinking of.

GOP House leader and pension killer Tom Cross.

Governor Quinn, GOP House Leader Tom Cross and Rahm Emanuel all expressed shock at the abuse of the state employee pension system.

Said Quinn:

“Taxpayer money must be protected, which is why I supported lawmakers’ move to address egregious abuses of the pension system. … I look forward to reviewing and taking action quickly when the bill reaches my desk.”

Quinn is not talking about the abuse that

Diocese letter pushed principals to promote vouchers - The Answer Sheet - The Washington Post

Diocese letter pushed principals to promote vouchers - The Answer Sheet - The Washington Post:

Diocese letter pushed principals to promote vouchers

Just how involved did the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh get in the effort to promote vouchers? Very.

This is clear in an Oct. 20 letter that Dr. Ronald R. Bowes, assistant superintendent for policy and development in the diocese, wrote in October to Catholic school principals.

It calls for them to be “relentless” in promoting school choice, in part by telling parents who had received financial aid that they had to call their state legislators and push for school choice legislation to receive more financial aid the next year.

Read full article >>

School Tech Connect: Free Speech Zone

School Tech Connect: Free Speech Zone:

Free Speech Zone

I have nothing to add to this.

Robert Reich fills in some details, though.

Popout

The First Amendment is being stood on its head. Money speaks, and an unlimited amount of

Modern School: Give the People What They Want—Educational Snake Oil and Teachers to Burn!

Modern School: Give the People What They Want—Educational Snake Oil and Teachers to Burn!:

Give the People What They Want—Educational Snake Oil and Teachers to Burn!


Burn, Teacher, Burn! (Image from Flickr, cdrummks)
A recent poll by the Los Angeles Times and University of Southern California has found that a majority of California voters want teacher evaluations made public and student test scores used in their reviews.

So what?

Does the public necessarily get or even deserve what it demands? Do we make employee

Hechinger Report | Q&A with the College Board’s Sandy Baum: ‘Too many low-and moderate-income students are being left behind’

Hechinger Report | Q&A with the College Board’s Sandy Baum: ‘Too many low-and moderate-income students are being left behind’:

Q&A with the College Board’s Sandy Baum: ‘Too many low-and moderate-income students are being left behind’

Sandy Baum

Sandy Baum, an independent policy analyst for the College Board, discovered recently that colleges and universities awarded $5.3 billion in grants beyond the demonstrated financial need of students and their families this year. Her analysis included state-supported public universities, which in some cases gave more than half of their aid to students who federal formulas showed didn’t need it. Baum’s findings were documented in aHechinger Report story on November 25th that also ran on the front page of USA Today. Baum spoke withHechinger Report editor Liz Willen about her findings and what they mean.

Q: New figures from the College Board show that U.S. colleges and universities are handing out $5.3

NJ Spotlight | Op-Ed: Waiting for Achilles Focusing on NJ's student achievement gaps misses he broader -- and better -- picture

NJ Spotlight | Op-Ed: Waiting for Achilles:

Op-Ed: Waiting for Achilles
Focusing on NJ's student achievement gaps misses he broader -- and better -- picture

There is a famous paradox, attributed to the Greek mathematician Zeno, in which there is a race between the great hero Achilles and a lowly tortoise. In view of their vastly different speeds, the tortoise was granted a substantial head start. The race began, and in a short time Achilles had reached the tortoise's starting spot. But in that time, the tortoise had moved slightly ahead. In the second stage of the race Achilles quickly covered that short distance, but the tortoise moved a little farther onward. And so it was that this continued -- Achilles would reach where the tortoise had been, but the tortoise would always inch ahead, just out of his reach. From this example, the great Aristotle, concluded that, "In a race, the quickest runner can never overtake the slowest, since the pursuer must first reach the point whence the pursued started, so that the slower must always hold a lead."

The lesson that we should take from this paradox is that when we focus only on the differences between groups, we too easily lose track of the big picture. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the current public discussions of the size of the gap in test scores that is observed between racial groups. It has been noted that in New Jersey the gap between the average scores of white and black students on the well-developed scale of the National Assessment of Educational Progress