Latest News and Comment from Education

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

PAA opposes House charter school bill « Parents Across America

PAA opposes House charter school bill « Parents Across America

PAA opposes House charter school bill

Parents Across America opposes bill that would increase charter schools
National grassroots group: HR 2218 should give priority to children,not charter operators
July 5, 2011 – For immediate release
Contact: Julie Woestehoff, 773-538-1135 or pure@pureparents.org
Caroline Grannan, cgrannan@gmail.com, 415/412-5758
Today, Parents Across America (PAA), a grassroots organization representing public school parents from across the United States, released a position statement opposing HR 2218, the so-called “Empowering Parents through Quality Charter Schools Act.”
As parents, we fear that too much of this bill seems designed to alter a current law not to better serve our children but because it’s ‘not meeting the needs of the charter school community,’ as the Bill Summary puts it,” explained PAA founding member Julie Woestehoff of Chicago. “We believe that children, not charter school operators, should be the priority.”
The bill would provide extra support for charter school expansion, including providing new incentives for raising or abolishing charter school caps, and for taking decisions for authorizing new charter schools away from local school boards – despite substantial research showing that charter schools overall are no better than traditional neighborhood schools. The bill supplements charter school facilities funding and adds incentives for virtual (Internet-based) charter schools.
The PAA statement, released on July 5, said: “We are concerned that the overall effect of the bill will be to rapidly increase the quantity and not the quality of charter schools, without the necessary safeguards, and to weaken the public school system, which we believe is the very backbone of democracy.” The organization is sending a letter announcing the statement to all members of the House Education and the Workforce Committee, which recently approved HR 2218, and to the members of the US Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. PAA members are also sending the statement to their own congressional representatives.
The PAA statement said the organization had hoped that HR2218 would address “concerns about the lack of equity, quality, parental rights, and accountability of many charter schools.” The organization recognized that “the bill makes some progress toward those goals” and offered to work to improve HR2218 “in order to assure better charter school transparency, accountability and governance, so that they fulfill the role … of partners in improving the overall quality of our nation’s public schools.”
PAA founding member and New Orleans parent advocate Karran Harper Royal said: “We need legislation that provides relief for parents who are forced to choose a charter school when the charter takes over the neighborhood school” – a situation that is particularly troubling in her city, where the school system was dismantled after Hurricane Katrina. “When students must compete for access in a lottery, they can be left without a school to attend in their neighborhood. And a concern that affects the lives of many families is the way students with disabilities have been systematically excluded or pushed out of many charter schools.”
Albany, N.Y., parent and PAA founding member Mark Mishler added his concerns about the bill’s lack of assistance to a school district like his. “The charter school industry has targeted our relatively small urban district with an over-saturation of charters that causes a financial drain, without concern for the impact on the majority of students who will continue to attend the public schools.”
The organization doesn’t criticize parents for choosing charter schools, Woestehoff emphasized. “We understand why parents might be attracted to charter schools because of the disinvestment in traditional neighborhood schools under the current administration,” she said. “Parents want their children to attend schools that are important to people in power, and that get the funding they need to provide a high-quality education. Right now, charter schools fit that description more than traditional neighborhood schools. We feel that this is unfair and undemocratic, and that all schools should receive equal resources.”
The PAA statement called for improvements in the bill, including replacing its call for centralized state chartering entities with “guarantees that there will be parent and community input in the charter school authorizing process” and “the right of local communities to approve or disapprove the establishment of charter schools in their communities, either through direct vote or through their school boards or other locally elected body.”
PAA urged lawmakers to include in the bill: prohibitions on charter school enrollment processes that pose a barrier to families: transparency requirements on school procedures, discipline, attrition and governance; and continued caps on new charter schools until improved oversight can assure the schools’ quality.
The statement concludes: “There is no reasonable rationale for using taxpayer funds to build more charter schools until and unless the federal government provides resources to build and renovate our traditional public schools, especially in underfunded and overcrowded urban districts, proportional to the number of students currently enrolled in them.”
Some problems with charter schools:
  • Charter school achievement overall is no better than that of traditional public schools.
  • Charter schools drain resources from traditional public schools and school districts.
  • Charter schools do not serve their share of the highest-need, most at-risk children.
  • Charter schools are not accountable to the public or to their own school communities.
  • Charter schools are often marked by often-secretly selective or exclusive admissions processes, including lengthy application forms requiring essays, teacher recommendations and more; pre-enrollment tests; and signed agreements to parent volunteer hours.
  • Charter schools are often marked by very high attrition – including the schools that are hailed for supposedly high graduation and college matriculation rates.
  • Charter schools provide fertile ground for incompetent or dishonest operators and have too often been marked by financial mismanagement or criminal behavior.
  • Charter schools consume far more than their share of the time and attention of school boards, to the detriment of traditional public schools.
A detailed fact sheet referencing some of the many recent reports of charter school problems is here.

True and False on NEA's New Evaluation Policy - Teacher Beat - #NEARA11

True and False on NEA's New Evaluation Policy - Teacher Beat - Education Week

True and False on NEA's New Evaluation Policy

I've been getting lots of queries about the NEA's new teacher-evaluation policy, and the best way to address this is to list some of the common assertions I'm reading out there and to try to parse their "truthiness." Without further ado:

The policy statement adds nothing new to NEA's position on evaluations.: FALSE. Your intrepid blogger dragged NEA's 450-page handbook all the way to Chicago for just this kind of question! And under perusal, I found that current resolution D-20, which governs existing policy on teacher evaluation is fairly unspecific as to what should be reviewed in evaluations.

The new policy statement, in saying that teachers' evaluations must include a measure of the teacher's ability to improve student learning, is a step more specific. Also, D-20 opposes students' scores being used for evaluation.

State probe finds widespread cheating in Atlanta schools, could lead to criminal prosecution :: The Republic

State probe finds widespread cheating in Atlanta schools, could lead to criminal prosecution :: The Republic

Probe Finds Widespread Cheating in Atlanta Schools

ATLANTA — A probe has found that more than 78 percent of Atlanta schools examined by state investigators engaged in cheating on standardized tests.

Some findings from the report were released by Gov. Nathan Deal on Tuesday.

Deal said 44 of the 56 schools investigated took part in cheating. Investigators also found that 38 principals were wither responsible for the cheating or were directly involved in it. And they determined that 178 teachers and principals cheated. Of those, 82 confessed to the misconduct.

Deal said Tuesday that the results of the investigation are being

Dispiriting Numbers on Education, Civil Rights

National Journal Online -- Education Experts -- Dispiriting Numbers on Education, Civil Rights

Dispiriting Numbers on Education, Civil Rights

The Education Department released new data last week showing that educational disparities are still very much a reality, despite the best efforts of policymakers and school administrators. Here are some of the findings:

• About 3,000 schools serving nearly 500,000 high school students offer no algebra II classes.

• Some 7,300 schools serving more than 2 million students have no access to calculus classes.

• Schools serving mostly African-American students are twice as likely to have teachers with just one or two years of experience.

• Students with limited English proficiency make up 6 percent of the high school population, but are 15 percent of the students for whom algebra is the highest-level math course taken.

• Only 2 percent of students with disabilities are taking at least one Advanced Placement class.

The data is part of a massive new effort by the Education Department to identify where the gaps are in education achievement and access. It covers a multitude of topics such as access to guidance counselors, bullying policies, prevalence of math and science courses, and where the best (and worst) teachers are clustered.

The results may be depressing, especially for those who have been working for years on making sure all kids get

Ed. Dept. Warns States It Will Enforce 'Broken' NCLB - Politics K-12 - Education Week

Ed. Dept. Warns States It Will Enforce 'Broken' NCLB - Politics K-12 - Education Week

Ed. Dept. Warns States It Will Enforce 'Broken' NCLB

| No comments | No recommendations

To the states out there that plan to disregard the No Child Left Behind Act, the Education Department says this: Not so fast.

Idaho, Montana, and South Dakota so far have notified the department that they do not plan to follow the federal accountability law, and instead will use their own accountability systems. But that's not going to fly, department officials say. If Congress does not rewrite the law, either Education Secretary Arne Duncan will enforce the existing law, which he has called "broken," or he will allow states to earn waivers in "exchange for reform." (That's plan B.) There is no plan C.

Spokesman Justin Hamilton said this today when I asked him about the states that plan to disobey the law: "We all agree NCLB is broken, and the best way to fix it is for Congress to send a bipartisan bill for the President to sign by the start of the school year. If Congress needs more time, our plan B would be to offer relief in exchange for reform to states who desperately want flexibility from

Rhee's Florida education reform plan called a 'train wreck'

Rhee's Florida education reform plan called a 'train wreck'

School Tech Connect: Where Will Arne Go? #NEARA11

School Tech Connect: Where Will Arne Go?

Where Will Arne Go?

This will be my last NEA endorsement post for a while, I promise. And who really knows how things will work out-- it may have been a canny move on Dennis Van Roekel's part to speed up the unearned endorsement. If more time elapsed, it might become clearer to the membership that the GOP positions on public education are the same as the President's, and then they would find themselves in the awkward position of having to endorse Obama on strictly non-education issues. Who knows?

For fun, let's imagine for a moment that the NEA didn't disarm, and that they found themselves with some influence over policy. What if they found themselves in a position to influence the early departure of Arne Duncan, for example? I'm fascinated by the guy, personally, as is obvious in my posts over the last year. Where would Arne go? What would he do?

The man is an anomaly, as I've pointed out before. He's never had to beat out other candidates for a job in his life. Which organization would pick him up? I figure his main choices are below:

NEA Endorses Obama: Strange Attraction #NEARA11

Rich Gibson: Strange Attraction

Strange Attraction

By RICH GIBSON

On July 4th , National Education Association Representative Assembly delegates, local leaders from all over the USA, voted 5,414 to 2,102 to endorse the demagogue, Obama. Most of those opposed to the endorsement only sought to delay it, hoping to "send Obama a message," about the Race to the Top.

That vote count is a far wider margin than most observers predicted and, if 95% of the delegates actually voted as they usually do, it means that NEA has nearly 1500 less delegates at the convention than last year, and last year was down from the usual 10,000 or so. Even if NEA lost 30,000 members the past year, as their own figures indicate, that couldn't account for the notable drop in delegates.

In any case, keep in mind that on February 14th of this year, bosses from the NEA, AFL-CIO, Change to Win, and some national community groups held an extraordinary meeting at NEA's headquarters. NEA, the nation's largest union with more than 3.1 million members, isn't affiliated with the bankrupt AFL-CIO, nor CTW, although NEA's leadership has sought affiliation for 25 years, a move repeatedly rejected by NEA members–wisely so as the only people the AFL-CIO is good at fighting are their own members.

The February meeting grew out of labor tops' worries about the nascent

Rhee's D.C. cheating scandal 'heats up'

Rhee's D.C. cheating scandal 'heats up'

Rhee's D.C. cheating scandal 'heats up'

Written by M. Catherine Evans for the American Thinker. Read the original here.
“Top educator Wayne Ryan of Noyes Education Campus in Washington DC resigned his post after having been promoted by super school reformer Michelle Rhee. What precipitated the change? Following a timeline going back three years reveals questions which cannot be explained away. The story involves possible cheating on tests by “erasure corrections,” bonuses handed out to those teachers and principals overseeing the testing, and Rhee’s feigned innocence about the matter.

A year after StudentsFirst founder Michelle Rhee assumed the Chancellorship of DC schools she told Charlie Rose that standardized test scores should be given “the greatest weight” in performance-based teacher evaluations. That was 2008. Her nonprofit website bio makes the audacious claim that “under her leadership, the worst performing school district in the country became the only major city system to see double digit growth in state reading and math scores.”

If Rhee’s “double-digit growth” numbers sound too good to be true they probably are. A March 2011 report in

Shanker Blog » What Do We Do When Second Graders Think Math Is Not For Girls?

Shanker Blog » What Do We Do When Second Graders Think Math Is Not For Girls?

What Do We Do When Second Graders Think Math Is Not For Girls?

Posted by Esther Quintero on July 5, 2011

Although the past several generations have seen declining gender inequalities in educational attainment, gender-based differences in the fields of study we choose seem to persist (see here). For example, the percentage of women obtaining degrees in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields has remained exceedingly static in the last few decades (see here).

In trying to explain this persistent trend, some conclude that (1) women are not as interested in these fields, and/or that (2) women just aren’t as good as men in these domains. But how would one tell whether these explanations are right or wrong?

One problem is that people share specific, culturally based ideas about what men and women are and should be. Numerous studies demonstrate that the dearth of women in STEM fields can be directly linked to negative associations regarding girls and the sciences, and especially girls and math ability (see here and here).

While it is true that we tend to draw generalizations about groups of people based on what we observe, it‘s

Charter school reformers seek democratic control | MyCentralJersey.com | MyCentralJersey.com

Charter school reformers seek democratic control | MyCentralJersey.com | MyCentralJersey.com

Charter school reformers seek democratic control

Comments
Supporters of charter school reform gathered last month at a rally in Highland Park. / STAFF PHOTO: BOB MAKIN
Supporters of charter school reform gather last month at a rally in Highland Park.
Supporters of charter school reform gather last month at a rally in Highland Park. / STAFF PHOTO: BOB MAKIN
Supporters of charter school reform gathered last month at a rally in Highland Park.
Supporters of charter school reform gathered last month at a rally in Highland Park. / STAFF PHOTO: BOB MAKIN

CENTRAL JERSEY — As legislation is drafted and redrafted in the state Senate, proposed charter schools in Hillsborough, Flemington, Highland Park, South Brunswick and Plainfield await the impact of four bills passed in the Assembly last week.

The bills would reform the state’s 15-year-old Charter School Law by:

Requiring local approval for establishment of new charter schools;

Ensuring charter schools have financial, educational and demographic transparency and accountability;

Allowing private and parochial schools to be transformed into charters, as long as they don’t promote religious views;

The doorman gives me a piece of his mind. « Fred Klonsky's blog #neara11

The doorman gives me a piece of his mind. « Fred Klonsky's blog

The doorman gives me a piece of his mind.

This is the fifth morning I’ve attended the state caucus meeting of the NEA RA.

I’ve been commuting from home. I valet my car at the hotel and I’ve gotten to know the doorman pretty well.

“What the hell did you guys do yesterday,” he says to me?

“What do you mean?”

“That Obama vote. Don’t you guys know? The Republicans hate unions and the Democrats take you for granted.”

“Where were you yesterday? I could have used you on the floor yesterday.”

“Oh no! You didn’t want me up there. I would off…” And his voice trailed off.

Queens Teacher: Students Being Prepared for Cheap Labor Market

Queens Teacher: Students Being Prepared for Cheap Labor Market

Students Being Prepared for Cheap Labor Market

Students Being Prepared for Cheap Labor Market

The basis of American education is found in the Wilsonian model. That model perpetuates the economic class system which is dependent on cheap labor and poverty. The broad purpose of American education is to train the children to become workers, not capitalists. This in a capitalist's national economic.

When was the last time you heard of capitalists going into the poorest school districts and teaching those children how they will acquire capital and how to participate in the national economic as capitalists?

No, that does not happen. Children are taught to be present and on time, be quiet and polite, be sober, be compliant by following orders, not question "authority", not discuss wages with others, etc. In other words public education prepares American children to be cheap labor.

An education does not guarantee wages greater than the wages of poverty which America's capitalist oligarchy

NYC Educator: Everything Is on the Table

NYC Educator: Everything Is on the Table

Everything Is on the Table

I've heard quite a bit of talk about getting a seat at the table, most of it from the UFT. For example, we decided to partner with Bill Gates to study teacher evaluation via testing, and now "value-added" is all the rage. Gates endorses it, it was widely placed into practice before this study concluded, and teachers have lost jobs based on various flawed iterations of this system.

I recall the NEA speaking out against the nonsense propagated by Gates and Duncan, and was therefore shocked that they've apparently decided to not only endorse the Obama/ Duncan team, but also to support some undefined teacher evaluation program that appears not to even exist. Apparently, the allure of Obama has something to do with GOP candidates