Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Today's Big Education Ape - PostRank Top Mid Day Posts 1-24 #ows #edreform #edchat
Jay Greene (Inadvertently?) Argues for a 23% Funding Increase for Texas Schools « School Finance 101
Jay Greene (Inadvertently?) Argues for a 23% Funding Increase for Texas Schools
I was intrigued by this post from Jay Greene today, in which he points out that public schools can learn from charter schools and perhaps can implement some of their successes. Specifically, Greene is referring to KIPP-like “no excuses” charter schools as a model, and their strategies for improving outcomes including much extended school time (longer day/year). As the basis for his argument, Greene refers specifically to Roland Fryer’s updated analysis of Houston’s Apollo 20 schools – which are – in effect, models of no excuses charters applied in the traditional public district. Greene opines:
Traditional public schools can get results like a KIPP school without having to actually become
Schools Matter: Testing Band and Music is on its Way
Testing Band and Music is on its Way
The Education Department will spend about $5 billion on the program, and even if you’re thinking, hey, I could use $5 billion, consider this: New York won the largest federal grant, $700 million over the next four years. In that time, roughly $230 billion will be spent on public education in the state. By adding just one-third of one percent to state coffers, the feds get to implement their version of education reform.
The facts that school reformers ignore - The Answer Sheet - The Washington Post
The facts that school reformers ignore
This was written by Richard Rothstein, a research associate at the Economic Policy Institute, a non-profit organization created to broaden the discussion about economic policy to include the interests of low- and middle-income workers. From 1999 to 2002 he was the national education columnist of The New York Times, and he is the author of several books, including “Grading Education: Getting Accountability Right” and “Class and Schools: Using Social, Economic and Educational Reform to Close the Black-White Achievement Gap.” This appeared on the institute’s website.
Read full article >>Newt Gingrich’s ‘elite’ PhD topic
Dear Michelle Rhee: About that teacher evaluation study
Hawaii teachers reject contract in ‘blow’ to Race to the Top
NCLB waivers: The devil is in the details
RheeFirst! » Why Rhee is wrong on collective bargaining and teachers’ unions
Why Rhee is wrong on collective bargaining and teachers’ unions
Rhee claims to support the right of teachers to collectively bargain. She says she supports their rights to bargain base compensation and professional development. “But they should not actually be co-managing school systems, and many decisions do not belong on the bargaining table. For example, it would present a huge conflict of interest for unions to be negotiating performance evaluations when unions have to represent effective and ineffective teachers alike. Districts should be able to create evaluations, reward teachers’ success, empower parents with more choices, and run the school system while held to high standards for accountability and success.”
Nonsense. Unassailable research [here, here and here] directly refutes Rhee’s false dichotomies and strawmen. Peer Review and Assistance has been shown to work and indeed, teachers are the toughest critics of their



