Latest News and Comment from Education

Showing posts with label STUDENT EVALUATION OF TEACHERS SETS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label STUDENT EVALUATION OF TEACHERS SETS. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

Brevity – radical eyes for equity

Brevity – radical eyes for equity
Brevity



Some words are predictable—”arrogant,” “intimidating,” “mean,” “stoic,” “blunt,” “sarcastic.”

Predictable, that is, as descriptions of me.

I anticipate them, and I recognize they are inaccurate in some (most?) ways. They also hurt, sting at the very core of who I am, who I try to be.

Especially as a teacher.

Recently, a new label popped up—”passive aggressive.”

I didn’t expect that because “passive aggressive” doesn’t square with “blunt,” which I most certainly am. The context was also frustrating since it involved me frantically communicating (mostly on my phone email App) with a student who had put themselves in a precarious situation, about to fail a course by not meeting minimum requirements.

Since expectations for my course are explicit on my course materials, and since I routinely email students reminding students of those expectations (as CONTINUE READING: Brevity – radical eyes for equity

Monday, May 10, 2021

Student Agency and Responsibilities when Learning to Write: More on the Failure of SETs – radical eyes for equity

Student Agency and Responsibilities when Learning to Write: More on the Failure of SETs – radical eyes for equity
Student Agency and Responsibilities when Learning to Write: More on the Failure of SETs



As anticipated and predicted, my student evaluations of teaching (SET) included what has become a classic contradiction; in my first-year writing seminar, I received strong praise for my feedback and diligent support for students revising their writing along side a student who proclaimed that I provided no valuable feedback.

I typically share this recurring evidence that SETs are deeply flawed on social media, and I also reached out to students in my upper-level writing/research course since the SETs from that course had a much higher number of negative comments than is typical (again including contradictory responses about my feedback and support for revising).

Several comments on social media—including those by former high school students from decades ago and current colleagues—helped me work past the frustration of anonymous and misguided comments. In short, I want to stress that while SET data lack validity, student comments may offer more insight CONTINUE READING: Student Agency and Responsibilities when Learning to Write: More on the Failure of SETs – radical eyes for equity