Latest News and Comment from Education

Showing posts with label SCREEN TIME. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SCREEN TIME. Show all posts

Monday, November 16, 2020

CURMUDGUCATION: Donors Choose Monday: The Extra Screen

CURMUDGUCATION: Donors Choose Monday: The Extra Screen
Donors Choose Monday: The Extra Screen


Every Monday, I'm making a donation to someone on Donors Choose, a well-rated charity site that lets folks offer financial support to teachers across the country. No, we shouldn't have to do this. Yes, some of the requests might raise an eyebrow (is that something you really need, really?) But we are where we are in the world right now, and this is a small way to help support individual classrooms in a concrete way.

This week I'm looking at a request for a second screen. Actually, there are many such requests on the site. If you have never had a second screen, well-- it's heaven. Two or three windows open at once, able to work on this without having to minimize that. And in the age of the zoom meeting (or Google Meet or whatever software you're using during the pandemess), a second screen can be one of those things that just makes life a bunch easier. It's exactly the kind of thing that a teacher can really benefit from and administration would label an unnecessary luxury.

So I'm donating to a teacher at the Young Women's Leadership School in the Bronx. The dollar CONTINUE READING: CURMUDGUCATION: Donors Choose Monday: The Extra Screen

Tuesday, October 6, 2020

Parenting during the Pandemic | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

Parenting during the Pandemic | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

Parenting during the Pandemic




With the closure of U.S. schools in March of the infamous year of 2020 and the desperation-driven reform of distance learning, Moms have become teacher-in-charge. The cartoon below offers a glimpse of a traditional and familiar style of parenting. Less than a decade ago, a Yale Law professor categorized the Mom in this cartoon as exhibiting one historical patterns in rearing children.
In 2011, Amy Chua wrote an international best seller about her tough-love parenting of daughters in Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother. She must have laughed all the way to the bank at the fuss she kicked up about her tough-love parenting of daughters.  Time magazine reported that her Wall Street Journal op-ed garnered over a million readers and 5000 comments.
For educated, financially comfortable non-Tiger Moms, however, the thought of giving up “Baby Mozarts,” chants of “well done” to build self- esteem, and, yes, CONTINUE READING: Parenting during the Pandemic | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

Saturday, September 26, 2020

NANCY BAILEY: The Longtime Plan for Screens to Replace Teachers: School Choice the Prenda Way

The Longtime Plan for Screens to Replace Teachers: School Choice the Prenda Way

The Longtime Plan for Screens to Replace Teachers: School Choice the Prenda Way




No matter your viewpoint on the coronavirus, for those who care about democratic public schools, our fears merge when it comes to worrying that technology will replace teachers and end those schools. Covid-19 is the perfect storm, and Prenda micro-schools are the prototype. These are schools that focus on commercial tech programs without real teachers. Students learn by screens. Getting rid of teachers is a massive goal of the privatization movement. It’s not a new goal, either.
In 1992, The Nation published a report, “A small circle of friends: Bush’s new American schools.” President H. W. Bush, then Education Secretary Lamar Alexander, and Fortune 500 C.E.O.s launched the New American Schools Development Corporation (NASDC).
The report says, It was the centerpiece of Bush’s education plan and was supposed to mark the emergence of corporate America as the savior of the nation’s schoolchildren.
The NASDC didn’t become the revolution they planned, but it’s easy to see their fingerprints on the corporate push for school privatization today, including the influence of technology.
Here are some excerpts of The Nation’s report.
Perhaps most chilling, many of the plans approved by NASDC use CONTINUE READING: The Longtime Plan for Screens to Replace Teachers: School Choice the Prenda Way

Friday, September 25, 2020

HOW MUCH IS TOO MUCH? Screen Time Guidelines For Distance Learning - capradio.org

Don’t Cite Pre-Pandemic Screen Time Guidelines For Distance Learning, Pediatricians Say - capradio.org

HOW MUCH IS TOO MUCH?
Screen Time Guidelines For Distance Learning


Big Education Ape: Scores of Education Experts Call on Schools to Reject Screen-Saturated Return to Learning | Common Dreams News - http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2020/08/scores-of-education-experts-call-on.html



Editor’s note: We’ve updated this story’s headline to clarify the recommendations were based on guidelines, not a study.
When Sacramento City schools started back up again just before Labor Day this year, parents were scrambling to figure out their kids’ online learning schedule for the fall.
The teachers union and the Sacramento City Unified School District still hadn’t agreed on a distance learning plan during the pandemic. So the school system sent out the schedule as they wanted it, and the teachers moved forward with their own. 
The crux of their dispute? About an hour of screen time a day.
The district wants first graders to have at least three hours of live time with their instructor. But teachers say, that’s too much screen time. It should be less than two hours for that age group.
“We can’t support a district plan that puts our 6-, 7- and 8-year-olds in front of a screen on zoom for three or more hours a day. It goes against research on screen time and brain development, ” said Erin Macy, a teacher at John Cabrillo Elementary School, to reporters on Labor Day.  
“This goes against our professional judgement and our ethical judgement,” she said.
The Sacramento City Teachers Association points to research from the American Academy of Pediatrics, which warns that too much screen time could lead to obesity, and could interfere with children’s sleep. Pediatricians say electronic device use should not get in the way of children getting a minimum of an hour of exercise a day, and, as a general framework, it’s healthy to keep screen time to less than two hours of recreational use a day.
But the doctors don’t think their guidelines should be used in the district’s fight.
“I don’t think they can be extrapolated that way,” said Dr. Cori Cross, spokesperson with the American Academy of Pediatrics. She said that pre-pandemic media-use guidelines “really applied to time when they weren’t doing homework.”  
She said their recommendations were mostly based on recreational screen use, not school work.  It’s better for kids to learn in-person, she said, but the COVID-19 pandemic has required education to be conducted in other ways.  
“The next best thing is remote education. So just because it’s on a screen, it’s not ideal, but it’s still better than nothing,” Cross said. “It has a lot more value than playing video games, or surfing the internet, or Facetiming with a friend.”
Still, the SCUSD and the Sacramento teachers are at odds over how many minutes should be live teacher instruction versus how much is independent study.

State education policy expert Alix Gallagher said schools across the state vary in the mix of live teacher interaction and independent study that is provided under distance learning.
But Gallagher, the director of Strategic Partnerships with Stanford University’s Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE), said that the state does set some standards through Senate Bill 98.
The state law requires a minimum amount of daily instruction by grade level, daily live CONTINUE READING: Don’t Cite Pre-Pandemic Screen Time Guidelines For Distance Learning, Pediatricians Say - capradio.org

Saturday, August 15, 2020

Mr. G for District 3: Chris Guerrieri's Education Matters: The ZOOM Lawsuit to decide the fate of teachers and students

Mr. G for District 3: Chris Guerrieri's Education Matters: The ZOOM Lawsuit to decide the fate of teachers and students

The ZOOM Lawsuit to decide the fate of teachers and students




I am confused why the judge didn't just say, well as long as we have to have court through zoom, we should have school through zoom too.

Corcoran and DeSantis are attempting to usurp the authority of districts and force them to do what they want them to do, not what the local supers and boards think is best, and nowhere is this more evident than in Hillsborough county.

From the Tampa Times,

Hillsborough County school officials were up against a deadline.

State officials had instructed them to revise their reopening plan or lose millions in funding. The School Board’s vote to start the year with four weeks of virtual lessons to lessen the chance of coronavirus infections didn’t meet state expectations. Plus thousands of teachers and more than 200,000 students were in limbo.

So on Thursday, superintendent Addison Davis announced a new timetable: The school year will begin Aug. 24 with all-virtual instruction. Then, for those who choose it, in-person school will begin a week later.

https://www.tampabay.com/news/hillsborough/2020/08/13/hillsborough-state-reach-compromise-on-school-reopening/

The state's strategy seems to be delay, delay, delay. First, they wanted a change of venue, then they wanted CONTINUE READING: 
Mr. G for District 3: Chris Guerrieri's Education Matters: The ZOOM Lawsuit to decide the fate of teachers and students

Wednesday, August 12, 2020

Scores of Education Experts Call on Schools to Reject Screen-Saturated Return to Learning | Common Dreams News

Scores of Education Experts Call on Schools to Reject Screen-Saturated Return to Learning | Common Dreams News

Scores of Education Experts Call on Schools to Reject Screen-Saturated Return to Learning
"Now is the time for parents and teachers to come together and demand what children really need."




As school districts across nation make plans for the fall semester—with the ongoing coronavirus pandemic forcing varying degrees of reliance on remote learning—scores of education experts on Tuesday sounded the alarm over the very real threat to students posed by increased screen time.
The warning comes in a new statement (pdf) that cites risks to student privacy, the potential entrenchment of controversial educational technology (EdTech), and students' need for authentic and human engagement.
"Our children and our nation deserve nothing less than safe schools and low-tech, child-centered, educator-driven learning."
—Education experts' joint statement
"With no end in sight to the pandemic, school leaders would do well to remember that remote learning does not have to equal online learning, and to emphasize offline approaches to support children's wellbeing and learning," said Faith Boninger, Ph.D. of the National Education Policy Center at the University of Colorado Boulder's School of Education.
Boninger is one of 70 experts that signed onto the statement authored by the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood's (CCFC) Children's Screen Time Action Network. The call is also backed by three dozen advocacy groups including the Massachusetts Teachers Association, Badass Teachers Association, Boston Teachers Union, and ParentsTogether.
The groups say their message applies "whether school is in-person, remote, or some combination thereof" and suggest educators eye with suspicion claims from the companies that sell educational technology under the guise of personalized learning.
As the joint statement explains:
Seizing an opportunity to capture a larger portion of the $10 trillion global CONTINUE READING: Scores of Education Experts Call on Schools to Reject Screen-Saturated Return to Learning | Common Dreams News