Latest News and Comment from Education

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

East L.A. Blowouts: Walking Out for Justice in the Classrooms | KCET

East L.A. Blowouts: Walking Out for Justice in the Classrooms | Highland Park | Departures Columns | KCET:



East L.A. Blowouts: Walking Out for Justice in the Classrooms




 In 1967 Mexican American students throughout the Southwest held a 60% high school dropout rate. If they did graduate, they averaged an 8th-grade reading level. Due to Anglo-centric internal school policies many Chicano students were fielded to vocational training or classes for the mentally disabled. Prejudice from teachers and administrators, both liberally-minded and outright bigoted, instigated stereotypes of Mexican Americans that discouraged the students from higher learning. These inequalities in education led to the 1968 East Los Angeles Walkouts, also known as the "Blowouts," which displayed the largest mobilization of Chicano youth leaders in Los Angeles history.

During the 1950s college educated and professional Chicanos, as part of the Education Committee of the Council of Mexican Americans Affairs, challenged the school system through proper channels, including P.T.A. participation and meetings with school officials and legislators. In 1967 Julian Nava was elected as the first Latino to serve on the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) board of education. Despite these efforts, however, Mexican American students continued to trail behind in the classroom.
The 1960s gave hope for social justice within the Chicano community, as civil rights leaders across the nation demanded change and equal opportunities for people of color. Leaders like Ceasar Chavez, Reiss Lopez Tijerina and Rodolfo "Corky" Gonzales were shaking up injustices in the labor system, presenting Chicano youth in Los Angeles with role models to emulate. Meanwhile, a developing iconography of cultural pride and beauty was empowering Chicanos with art and murals throughout East Los Angeles communities.
To combat the failed efforts toward progress in education, young Chicano activists looked to the changing political climate for a more direct approach for action. From March 1 to March 8 1968, approximately 15,000 students walked out of classes from Woodrow Wilson, Garfield, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Belmont, Venice and Jefferson High Schools, all demanding an equal, qualitative, and culturally relevant education. The protesters were blocked by administrators barring doors to the outside, and helmeted police officers either jailed or escorted students to their principals. Two student beatings were reported during the March 6 walkout at Roosevelt.
The walkouts were a result of both a changing cultural zeitgeist and the collective efforts of organizing groups such as the Brown Berets, United Mexican American Students (UMAS) and The Young Citizens for Community Action (YCAA), two local newspapers: La Raza and Inside Eastside; and Sal Castro, a Mexican American educator teaching at Lincoln. These leaders, along with local clergy, professionals and parents, formed the core of the Educational Issues Coordinating Committee (EICC), which served as a voicebox for the fight for equal student rights in the aftermath of the walkouts.
In a special meeting held March 11 1968, the students articulated their needs and injustices through the EICC in a list of 39 demands presented to the Los Angeles Board of Education. Chief among the demands were academic changes to the LAUSD curricula and source material in order to reflect Mexican American history and culture. They demanded bilingual education, Mexican folklore in textbooks, and the recruitment of administrators of Mexican descent in schools with a majority Mexican American student body. Additional demands included improvements to school buildings, facilities and the Industrial Arts Program -- designed seemingly to funnel Mexican Americans to low-paying jobs, which required less critical thinking and communication skills.
Unfortunately these demands fell to the wayside along with the public's attention. An anti-climactic community meeting held at Lincoln High School on March 28 brought 1200 attendees, who witnessed the Board of Education agree with 99% of student demands, yet not follow through citing lack of funding. When 13 of the walkout organizers, dubbed the L.A. 13, were later arrested on felony conspiracy charges for "disturbing the peace," the focus shifted dramatically to legal defense of those being prosecuted rather than fighting for equal education. The EICC dismantled not long afterward due to discontent between groups within the coalition, who ranged from militant youth to middle-class professionals.
If the walkouts weren't entirely successful, they certainly empowered and unified the East L.A. community under a just cause, while awakening the political consciousness of Chicano youth. With placards that read "Chicano Power," "Viva La Raza" and "Viva La Revolucion," they instigated the first public demonstration of Chicanismo en masse. Their demonstrations were covered by the Los Angeles Times and Chicano newspapers across the Southwest, increasing visibility of working-class, Chicano issues. However, with the grassroots support loss and the organization dissolved into merely a symbol, the needs of the working class were soon faded from the spotlight.

Garfield High School principal appealing to students to return to classes, March 7th 1968. Photo courtesy of the Los Angeles Public Library

Garfield High School principal appealing to students to return to classes, March 7th 1968. Photo courtesy of the Los Angeles Public Library


In recognition of the courageous efforts by these students we've listed their original demands below, as noted on Latinopia. The success of changes like 1998's Proposition 227, which introduced a Structured English Immersion model which is currently shaping a new generation of elementary school student in Highland Park, reflects great improvements for seeds laid by the student protesters. Yet much and more has changed since 1968. Read the list to learn more about Chicana/o youth struggles in the 1960s, and see how they fit in with contemporary educational needs:
PROPOSALS MADE BY HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS OF EAST LOS ANGELES TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION
ACADEMIC
  • No student or teacher will be reprimanded or suspended for participating in any efforts which are executed for the purpose of improving or furthering the educational quality in our schools.
  • Bilingual-Bi-cultural education will be compulsory for Mexican-Americans in the Los Angeles City School System where there is a majority of Mexican-American students. This program will be open to all other students on a voluntary basis. A) in-service education programs will be instituted immediately for all staff in order to teach them the Spanish language and increase their understanding of the history, traditions, and contributions of the Mexican culture. B) All administrators in the elementary and secondary schools in these areas will become proficient in the Spanish language Participants are to be compensated during the training period at not less than $8.80 an hour and upon completion of the course will receive in addition to their salary not less than $100.00 a month. The monies for these programs East L.A. Blowouts: Walking Out for Justice in the Classrooms | Highland Park | Departures Columns | KCET:

Chicago Teacher Pension Money Invested With Rahm Emanuel's Friends and Donors #‎Chuy2015‬ ‪#‎imwithchuy‬

Chicago Teacher Pension Money Invested With Rahm Emanuel's Friends and Donors:



Chicago Teacher Pension Money Invested With Rahm Emanuel's Friends and Donors






 It is the kind of transaction Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s much-touted ethics reforms appeared designed to halt: Chicago teachers’ pension money flowed to financial companies connected to some of the mayor’s friends and top donors. Emanuel, whose administration appoints some members of the teachers’ pension-fund board, received campaign cash from those same financial firms despite his own 2011executive order purportedly preventing donors from receiving city business.

“When Mayor Emanuel took office, he said he was going to stop the culture of pay-to-play,” said Alderman Scott Waguespack, who is among a group of lawmakers asking the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate whether the donations also violated that agency’s anti-corruption rule. “This is an example of his failure to follow through on those promises.”
Emanuel’s office declined an International Business Times request for comment.
According to city documents obtained by IBTimes, the firm affiliated with Illinois’ Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner -- a longtime friend of Chicago’s Democratic mayor -- as well as executives at private-equity giant Madison Dearborn have gained substantial investments from the Chicago Teachers’ Pension Fund (CTPF) since Emanuel took office. The documents also show the CTPF has an indirect equity stake in Grosvenor Capital Management. Executives at the latter two firms have donated nearly $1.8 million to Emanuel’s campaign and political organizations since 2011.
The teachers’ pension money went to the donors’ firms even though the Chicago Teachers Union has become one of Emanuel’s most outspoken opponents after the mayor shuttered 50 schools across the city and proposed cutting public employees’ retirement benefits. SEC rules are designed to prohibit campaign contributions to city officials from executives at firms managing city pension money. Those rules are in addition to the executive order signed by Emanuel that purports to prohibit campaign donations from city contractors and subcontractors.
“Pay-to-play practices unfortunately remain all too common in pension funds,” said Jay Youngdahl, a fellow at the Initiative for Responsible Investment at Harvard University. “It encourages a toxic milieu in which pension trustees may place their own interests or the interests of those who appointed them above the interests of the people whose healthy retirement depends on the funds. For an investment manager to donate hundreds of thousands of dollars to a public official charged with appointing trustees to a fund, while at the same time providing investment services and soliciting business from a pension fund, is a clear red flag.”
The CTPF, whose board includes two appointees from Emanuel’s board of education, declined to comment, as did Rauner’s company, GTCR. Michael Sacks, the CEO of Grosvenor who also serves as atop Emanuel administration appointee, told IBTimes that while the teachers’ pension system does have an indirect equity stake in Grosvenor, it does not pay fees to the firm. A representative of Madison Dearborn asserted that federal and municipal rules barring donations from companies managing pension money do not apply to the firm.
The new disclosures follow a November report showing other Chicago pension funds overseen by Chicago Teacher Pension Money Invested With Rahm Emanuel's Friends and Donors:

Wisconsin Education Policy: Part 1 Hail to the king. Part 2. Let the bodies hit the floor. | BustED Pencils

Wisconsin Education Policy: Part 1 Hail to the king. Part 2. Let the bodies hit the floor. | BustED Pencils:

BustED Pencils

Wisconsin Education Policy: Part 1 Hail to the king. Part 2. Let the bodies hit the floor.

Re_di_Midlands_01_by_M0lybdenum







 Once again our elected officials have decided to intervene (here and here) in matters that deal with public education and as usual they continue to muck around—and if they get their way—make things worse for children, but reward campaign donors.

First, in a blatant attack on one of our foundational democratic institutions, our elected officials have decided to usher in a new era of monarchies.  School boards will be stripped of any authority to make decisions that reflect the values of their communities and local superintendents will be given supreme rule over local public schools.
The revised Assembly bill, released Tuesday, also places sole decision-making power with a school district superintendent to improve a low-performing school, and the ability to override school board policies.
If a public school does not improve after three years, the bill requires a school board to authorize its superintendent to act unilaterally to improve the school ‘contrary to policies and procedures adopted by the school board.’
The bill also prohibits school boards from “retaliating” against the superintendent.
Yes.  There it is.  Elected school boards will be neutered and possibly even punished for representing our local communities.
Now I’ll be the first to admit that local school board politics can be messy and sometimes even divisive, but is that really a reason to give all authority to one person?  And let’s be real.  Do we really believe the “unilateral” power proposed for supers will not be usurped by politicians—essentially creating puppet rulers that really only represent the desires of campaign donors?
How about teasing out this idea (legislation)?  If public schools continue to serve legislatively neglected students and communities, we require that our elected officials turn over the authority to qualified educators and community members to make evidence based policy decisions? And if need be, our elected officials will also be required to provide the necessary resources that legislatively neglected schools deserve.
Part 2.
And if the gut shot to community based democracy wasn’t enough, our elected officials Wisconsin Education Policy: Part 1 Hail to the king. Part 2. Let the bodies hit the floor. | BustED Pencils:

LAUSD board votes to send 2,400 employees pink slips | abc7.com

LAUSD board votes to send 2,400 employees pink slips | abc7.com:



LAUSD BOARD VOTES TO SEND 2,400 EMPLOYEES PINK SLIPS






 LOS ANGELES (KABC) --

The Los Angeles Unified School District board voted Tuesday to send pink slips to more than 2,400 employees in an effort to deal with a nearly $160 million budget deficit heading into the 2015-2016 school year. 

The board voted unanimously to support Superintendent Ramon Cortines' recommendation to send out the layoff warning notices by a March 15 deadline. 

Included on the list of those who will receive notices are more than 260 adult education teachers, 59 counselors, dozens of foreign-language teachers, 63 psychiatric social workers and 1,800 administrators. 

Tuesday's approved recommendation is LAUSD's first move to lay off employees since 2012 when 5,000 teachers lost their jobs. The district blames the shortfall on declining enrollment. Officials say about 40,000 students have left LAUSD in the last three years alone and 175,000 in the last decade. 

The shortfall is also due to increasing retirement pension costs, rising health benefit costs for current employees and retirees and underfunding of special education, LAUSD said. 

According to the teachers' union, United Teachers Los Angeles, however, the pink slips are LAUSD's push-back for the ongoing impasse in labor contract talks. 

UTLA President Alex Caputo-Pearl blasted the layoff notices, saying he believes there is funding available to prevent them.

"This doesn't make sense, and it especially doesn't make sense in the face of actually having money," Caputo-Pearl said. "We know from the state that there's going to be an eight to ten percent increase in funding coming into LAUSD."

LAUSD says the notices could be rescinded in May when Gov. Jerry Brown releases his revisions to the state budget.
LAUSD board votes to send 2,400 employees pink slips | abc7.com:

Let Them Eat Charters | EduShyster

Let Them Eat Charters | EduShyster:



Let Them Eat Charters



 Will Massachusetts reduce its public school system to crumbs?

cake crumbsThe rich are different from you and me, reader. For one thing, they are rich, which means that when passion strikes they can forget, for a moment, their billable hours and labor for free. It’s called pro bono, and it is Roman for *charter schools are great.* I am alluding, of course, to the new news that three of Boston’s whitest white shoe law firms, WilmerHale, Goodwin Procter LLP and FoleyHoag LLP, are joining forces for the kids, for free. What makes this new news even newsier is that the three firms have long been fierce rivals in the battle to ensure that no litigation is left unlitigated. Why it’s like that time that crew-sters from Harvard, Yale AND Princeton all climbed into a single shell and rowed down the Charles together!
white-bucks-2 (1)Old bucks 4 new schools
No doubt you have many questions about thepro bono-ists’ civil-rights-based challenge to the state’s cap on the number of charter schools. Such as *from whence does theexpression white shoe law firm come?* As always, I am happy to shed light. You see the phrase derives from *white bucks,* laced suede or buckskin shoes with a red sole, long popular in the sorts of Ivy League colleges that our pro bono-ists no doubt attended. What? You want to know how it is that civil rights can be used to argue for more charter schools, when, according to a growing body of case law, students in charter schools don’t actuallyhave civil rights? Or how, in the course of four decades, *civil rights* could go from afierce battle over desegregating schools and diversifying the teaching force to the fresh new right of students to attend more segregated schools and be taught by Let Them Eat Charters | EduShyster:

Telephone Town Hall for ESEA Activists! #AFT

http://action.aft.org/c/44/p/salsa/web/common/public/signup?signup_page_KEY=7725

Telephone Town Hall for ESEA Activists!




Register for the activist telephone town hall with AFT president Randi Weingarten for a briefing on ESEA and NCLB.

Date: Wednesday, March 11, 2015
Time: 8:00 p.m. eastern
A final vote on ESEA is stalled in the House, but the Senate is working on its own version. Over the next couple of weeks, we will need to encourage senators and representatives to fix the federal education law in a meaningful way by finding solutions that will mitigate poverty’s impact on children from low-income families. 

To continue this discussion and help us in our work, AFT President Randi Weingarten will hold a telephone town hall, with activists like you, this Wednesday, March 11, at 8 p.m. Eastern time, to discuss what we need to do to continue the fight to get ESEA back to its original intent and level the playing field for all children.
You will receive an automatic call to the phone number you provide below shortly before 8:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 11. You will then be placed on a brief hold until the conference call begins.
http://action.aft.org/c/44/p/salsa/web/common/public/signup?signup_page_KEY=7725

American Federation of Teachers (AFT) conference call tonight at 5pm PST of anyone wants to RSVP below.
ESEA Activist Telephone Town Hall
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
8 p.m. EST / 5 p.m. PST
Click here to RSVP

Virtual Schools Remain Unproven | National Education Policy Center

Virtual Schools Remain Unproven | National Education Policy Center:



Virtual Schools Remain Unproven

Team of scholars produce annual examination of online education



 


Boulder, CO (March 10, 2015) – The third edition of the National Education Policy Center’s annual report on virtual schools finds that while online schools continue to proliferate, there continues to be little evidence of their effectiveness. The limited evidence in hand indicates that virtual schools lag behind traditional public schools.
Virtual Schools in the U.S. 2015: Politics, Performance, Policy, and Research Evidence, published today, edited by University of Colorado Boulder professor Alex Molnar, consists of three major sections on policy issues, research findings and descriptive information on the nation’s virtual schools. 
“The NEPC reports contribute to the existing evidence and discourse on virtual education by providing an objective analysis of the evolution and performance of full-time, publicly funded K-12 virtual schools,” Molnar points out.
As previous editions of the report have found, the 2015 analysis concludes that “Claims made in support of expanding virtual education are largely unsupported by high quality research evidence.” While lawmakers in some states have made attempts to provide greater oversight on the virtual school industry, those efforts have not been especially successful. Moreover, the report observes, such actions as policymakers have attempted do not appear to be well informed by research evidence.
The first section of the report, by Luis Huerta of Columbia University’s Teachers College and Sheryl Shafer, includes a comprehensive survey of virtual school legislation introduced in the states in 2014. Additionally, Huerta and Shafer consider a range of policy issues that remain unresolved. These include how to ensure that teachers who provide online instruction have appropriate training and development for the distinctive characteristics of the online classroom setting, and how to more closely guard against profiteering by private for-profit companies.
The second section, by Michael Barbour of Sacred Heart University, surveys the research literature on virtual education and ponders the fact that “more than twenty years after the first virtual schools began, there continues to be a dearth of empirical, longitudinal research to guide the practice and policy of virtual schooling.”
The third section, by Gary Miron of Western Michigan University and Charisse Gulosino of the University of Memphis, takes stock of the country’s virtual schooling operations, with analyses that examine the demographics of virtual school students as well as the virtual schools’ outcomes where measures such as Adequate Yearly Progress and graduations rates are concerned – metrics increasingly used to judge conventional public schools in the name of accountability. On measures of student achievement and general educational outcomes, they write, “full-time virtual schools continued to lag significantly behind traditional brick-and-mortar schools.”
Find a copy of the NEPC report Virtual Schools in the U.S. 2014: Politics, Performance, Policy, and Research Evidence online at

http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2015.

The mission of the National Education Policy Center is to produce and disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed research to inform education policy discussions. We are guided by the belief that the democratic governance of public education is strengthened when policies are based on sound evidence.  For more information on NEPC, please visit http://nepc.colorado.edu/.
This report is made possible in part by the support of the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice (GLC).  For more information about GLC, visithttp://www.greatlakescenter.org/.

Big Education Ape: Ohio’s First Public School Hundred-Millionaire: ECOT Founder William Lager http://bit.ly/1ETIoe3
Big Education Ape: Charter spent $2.27M on advertising | The Columbus Dispatch http://bit.ly/1ETD7mt
Big Education Ape: Report Slams Virtual Charter Schools That Graduate Just 36% Of Students - BuzzFeed Newshttp://bit.ly/1AVX7nl

As Students Opt Out of Common Core Exams, Some Say Movement Is Not About Testing - US News

As Students Opt Out of Common Core Exams, Some Say Movement Is Not About Testing - US News:



Opt-Out Movement About More Than Tests, Advocates Say

Thousands of students are refusing to take annual Common Core-aligned exams, even when the consequences may be severe.

BustED Pencils
Go to  BustED Pencils Website

Tens of thousands of parents and students nationwide are engaging in civil disobedience by refusing to participate in federally mandated standardized tests, as states are fully deploying new exams aligned to the Common Core State Standards for the first time.
While the opt-out movement has gained steam from some looking to protest the controversial academic standards and what they say is an overemphasis on testing in schools, some of its leaders say it's about more than just those two things.
"Opt-out is not an anti-testing movement. This is a movement to reclaim and do what’s right for kids in public schools," says Tim Slekar, a leader of the United Opt Out movement in Wisconsin and dean of the school of education at Edgewood College. "This is a movement to restore real learning."
Spending on standards and tests, Slekar says, has taken away from funding music and arts programs, for example, and could be better allocated elsewhere.
"Why are the standards – the first ones we set – not, 'All kids will come to school not hungry, not sick and with access to books?'" Slekar says. "Those are some great standards, but yet those standards we're not allowed to go after."
"A place for testing is when it is given back to the classroom teacher," he adds. "Politicians have no business of being in the testing, teaching and learning business. They're the ones to blame for the fact that we have an increasing achievement gap … They're responsible for the absolute disaster we see in some of our poorer public schools."
The number of students who have chosen not to take the tests has varied, from a relative handful who have opted out to hundreds who have walked out in protest.
Widespread protests against the Common Core-aligned tests began last month, when states began administering exams created by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) consortium. The other Common Core testing consortium, the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC), will begin administering exams in about 20 states later this month. Parents, teachers and school leaders have expressed concern that the tests may be too difficult or time-consuming, or that their schools' technology might not be up to snuff for what the tests require.
For many, the jury is still out on both the Common Core standards and the linked exams. Teach Plus, a nonprofit focused on placing effective teachers in urban schools, on Tuesday released a survey of more than 1,000 teachers in Boston, Chicago, Memphis, Nashville and the District of Columbia who evaluated sample PARCC questions. More than three-quarters – 79 percent – of teachers said the test items were better than what their states used to have, but there were mixed results on whether they were grade-appropriate or too challenging.
"As a teacher, we know developmentally some kids might not learn to read until the second grade," says Peggy Robertson, a former teacher and an administrator of the national United Opt Out group. "It's not like when a kid can’t walk you push them harder to walk. You wait and allow them to walk as they’re ready. Under Common Core, if you’re not reading at a particular level in kindergarten … you’re As Students Opt Out of Common Core Exams, Some Say Movement Is Not About Testing - US News:

New state standardized tests begin after rocky trial run - LA Times

New state standardized tests begin after rocky trial run - LA Times:



New state standardized tests begin after rocky trial run



Parents Can Opt Out - United Opt Out National

Click Here to go to United Opt Out National: 


Click Here to go to the WebsiteUnited Opt Out Team
Home
Click Here to go to the Website FairTest


Tuesday marked the first day that schools statewide could begin administering new  standardized tests that, for the first time, will be given online.

As the exams began, Los Angeles school officials acknowledged that a trial run of the test in February was a disaster both at the local and state level. The major problems have been corrected, officials said.

The English and math exams are part of a nationwide move to computerized assessments. California also is among 43 states that have adopted common learning goals linked to the new tests.

A major problem occurred Feb. 19, when L.A. Unified asked all of its schools to sign on to the state testing system for a two-hour trial. The state system crashed, forcing L.A. Unified to halt the effort about 30 minutes in, said Cynthia Lim, head of data and accountability for the nation’s second-largest school system.

State officials told L.A. Unified that it has since made fixes that will allow high levels of online traffic, Lim said.

But L.A. Unified also was having online traffic jams. During the trial, Internet access slowed through the school system. Only about two-thirds of schools were able to log into the practice test. Nearly 80% of these schools reported frustratingly slow response times and other issues.

Problems occurred on all types of devices used, including iPads, Chromebooks and desktop computers, Lim said.

The online exams are a welcome improvement over paper-and-pencil, multiple-choice tests, said state Supt. of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson.

The new approach reflects "the exciting changes taking place in California classrooms,” Torlakson said in a statement. “Students are being tested on their ability to reason and think. They must draw logical conclusions and cite evidence from what they have read, and they must solve real-world math problems.”

He added: These tests will give parents, teachers and schools the feedback they need to help students succeed.”

Torlakson conceded that technical issues have complicated the roll out.

Board member Monica Ratliff said she heard from schools that the test seemed to work best on desktop computers in computer labs.

Since the troubled practice run, L.A. Unified has made changes in its programming and equipment. The first testing on Tuesday seemed to go smoothly for about 6,000 students at 94 schools, Lim said.

The state intends to use this year’s results as a baseline to compare with future years.

L.A. schools Supt. Ramon C. Cortines said it may be too soon to use the tests for anything New state standardized tests begin after rocky trial run - LA Times:

Charter schools less likely to have libraries - The Washington Post

Charter schools less likely to have libraries - The Washington Post:



Charter schools less likely to have libraries






  March 10 at 5:53 PM  

Charter schools are far less likely than traditional schools to have libraries or librarians, surveys show.
During the 2011–12 school year, 49 percent of public charter schools reported having a library media center compared to 93 percent of traditional public schools in the United States, according to a survey by the National Center on Education Statistics.
Nationwide, one-third of libraries in public charter schools had full-time, paid, state-certified library media center specialists, compared to two-thirds of traditional public schools.
Publicly funded, independently operated charter schools typically have greater discretion over their spending and often have smaller or temporary facilities.
In 2014, the D.C. Public Charter School Board surveyed charter schools in the District to determine what library services they offer. Of the 100 campuses that reported library data, 43 had libraries outside the classroom, while 44 had classroom libraries. There were 13 campuses that reported having no library.
KIPP DC reported investing in classroom libraries at each of its campuses rather than in school-wide libraries.
Kate Finley, chief academic officer for KIPP DC, said it’s part of the culture of their classrooms for students to have a wide range of books at their fingertips, organized by reading levels.
Advocates for school libraries say centralized libraries serve a different purpose, as a center where students can learn research and information skills and where they can explore books on any topic at any level.
D.C. Public Libraries is opening a branch at DC Prep Benning Public Charter School this month, with plans to have a collection of 5,000 books and staff who will connect students and teachers to library resources at the Charter schools less likely to have libraries - The Washington Post: