Latest News and Comment from Education

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

An Alternative To Suspension And Expulsion: 'Circle Up!' : NPR Ed : NPR

An Alternative To Suspension And Expulsion: 'Circle Up!' : NPR Ed : NPR:



An Alternative To Suspension And Expulsion: 'Circle Up!'



 A restorative justice circle at Edna Brewer Middle School in Oakland, Calif.


One by one, in a room just off the gym floor at Edna Brewer Middle School in Oakland, Calif., seventh-graders go on the interview hot seat.
Some 80 students have applied to be "peer leaders" in the school's new, alternative discipline program called "restorative justice."
Kyle McClerkins, the program's director, grills them on aspects of adolescent life: "What is the biggest challenge for middle school girls? What has changed about you from sixth grade to now?"
This school and the Oakland Unified School District are at the forefront of a new approach to school misconduct and discipline. Instead of suspending or expelling students who get into fights or act out, restorative justice seeks to resolve conflicts and build school community through talking and group dialogue.
Its proponents say it could be an answer to the cycle of disruption and suspension, especially in minority communities where expulsion rates are higher than in predominantly white schools.
Oakland Unified, one of California's largest districts, has been a national leader in expanding restorative justice. The district is one-third African-American and more than 70 percent low-income. The program was expanded after a federal civil rights agreement in 2012 to reduce school discipline inequity for African-American students.
At Edna Brewer Middle School, the fact that students are taking the lead — that so many want to be part of this effort — shows that it's starting to take root.
"Instead of throwing a punch, they're asking for a circle, they're backing off and asking to mediate it peacefully with words," says Ta-Biti Gibson, the school's restorative justice co-director. "And that's a great thing."
Last school year — the program's first year — Gibson says, kids weren't ready to talk things out. "Last year there was a lot of different conflicts, An Alternative To Suspension And Expulsion: 'Circle Up!' : NPR Ed : NPR:

2014’s Best and Worst Players in Public Education - Democrats For Public Education

2014’s Best and Worst Players in Public Education - Democrats For Public Education:





2014’s Best and Worst Players in Public Education

December 17, 2014 | Posted in:Articles, News


2014 saw the formation of a much-needed and long overdue new organization to advocate for public schools. Democrats for Public Education (DPE) was launched in June by Ted Strickland, former governor of Ohio, and political consultant Donna Brazile. U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin was soon named co-chair. According to the group’s mission statement, DPE believes every student should have “access to a strong and safe neighborhood school with well-prepared and supported teachers, deep and engaging curriculum and social services to meet their mental, social and physical needs.”  Their message is clear: public education is a fundamental civil right and schools cannot be improved by cutting funding and attacking the very profession that is charged with teaching our students.

Many charter schools funded better than public schools, website shows - Chronicle-Telegram

Many charter schools funded better than public schools, website shows - Chronicle-Telegram:



Many charter schools funded better than public schools, website shows

A1,A2_121714_Page-A2
The Ohio Charter School Accountability Project, a joint venture of the Ohio Education Association teachers’ union and Innovation Ohio, released figures of the study on the websiteknowyourcharter.com. It provides the number of students enrolled in charter schools in every district in Ohio, as well as the grades associated with those charter schools and funding they receive.
In addition to providing insight into the funds provided to charter schools, the figures also show that many of the charter schools received lower grades than their traditional public school counterparts.
According to information provided by Innovation Ohio, the average school district last year received $4,149 per pupil, which is $1,596 less than the $5,745 base amount paid to charter schools. Local school districts have to make up that $1,596 state funding shortfall through local revenue or reductions.
The state spends more than $900 million on the 122,019 students enrolled full-time in charter schools, with 511 of 613 public school districts receiving less money per pupil than charter schools do, according to information provided by the Lorain County Educational Services Center.
In Lorain County, 3,800 students are enrolled in charter schools and more than $29 million is spent on those students, with more than $4.2 million coming from local funds. Six of the county’s 14 districts, Avon, Avon Lake, Clearview, Columbia, North Ridgeville and Sheffield, pay more in local dollars to charters than is deducted from the state foundation on a per pupil funding basis.
Two local educators, Greg Ring and Jay Arbaugh, traveled to Columbus on Tuesday to talk about charter school funding at Innovation Ohio headquarters.
“Charter schools really divert local tax dollars away from local districts,” Arbaugh, superintendent of Keystone Schools, said during a phone interview after the meeting. “That’s certainly not the intent of the people who are paying the local taxes.”
Ring, superintendent of the Lorain County Educational Services Center, said a county survey regarding charter schools was conducted earlier this year and 62 percent of respondents said they were opposed to local tax dollars leaving their districts to support for-profit and other charter schools.
“We know there are local tax dollars leaving to follow students into their charter schools,” Ring said. “Our survey results showed people were resoundingly against that, because sometimes those dollars are going to for-profit institutions which generally have lower ratings.”
Ring said local school boards and administrations have no control over the situation.
“Most people don’t understand this and when they realize what’s happening, they have a problem with it,” Ring said. “I think people vote on local levies expecting that the money will stay in our school systems.”
Arbaugh, who said he is not opposed to parents having a choice of where they send their children to school, said the funding issue needs to be addressed, especially since local governments are facing more revenue challenges than they ever have.
“I’m all for choice and competition,” Arbaugh said. “But when students in my district are going to charter schools that have an average grade of a D or less, and local tax dollars are being funneled to those Many charter schools funded better than public schools, website shows - Chronicle-Telegram:

MY DINNER WITH DEASY : The Unseemly Schemes of UTLA POWER SLATE andLAUSD's Scandal Barron, John Deasy

HEMLOCK ON THE ROCKS: MY DINNER WITH DEASY : The Unseemly Schemes of UTLA POWER SLATE andLAUSD's Scandal Barron, John Deasy:



MY DINNER WITH DEASY : The Unseemly Schemes of UTLA POWER SLATE andLAUSD's Scandal Barron, John Deasy

Ladies and gentlemen,
I got this information from Ms. Cathy Brava where she indicates names and last names of  people who met with John Deasy. Let me now tell  you the whole story.
Just  before his death, Matt Taylor, stood up at the South Area Meeting and asked Ms. Ingrid Villeda, South Area Director, to explain a little more about the meeting she and other Board of Directors had with John Deasy, the LAUSD SUperintendent. Ms. Ingrid Villeda, as usually happens, began to talk  about a meeting she and others  previously had at the LAUSD headquarters with Deasy. She indicated that Deasy had directed  her and other teachers to meet with him to discuss the issue of problematic principals.  Immediately, Matt Taylor interrupted and clarified to Ms. Villeda that he was not asking about the meeting they had at the LAUSD headquarters, but the other meeting they had with Deasy  in a private restaurant.  Ms. Villeda  strongly refused to talk about the meeting and claimed the meeting never took place.

Then, Matt Taylor re-addressed  his question and asked Ms. Villeda  to explain the reasons  for her and other UTLA members, to meet with Mr. Deasy in a private restaurant without  Warren Fletcher being present.  Ms. Villeda ignored Mr. Taylor questions  and forced a different issue on the agenda. Mr. Taylor asked her again and again and Ms. Ingrid continued to avoid the issue. She repeatedly said that Matt was interrupting and she was not going to discuss any of that with him or anybody else. Frustrated for not getting any answer, Mr. Taylor  decided to leave the room. As Mr. Taylor walked toward the exit, a few teachers approached Mr. Taylor and asked him about the issue. He indicated that a group of UTLA Directors had met with Deasy secretly  and Ingrid  was part of it.
Later,  Mrs. Cathy Brava  published a document titled “The Animals Farm”, and also made public that John Deasy requested a secret meeting to discuss several issues that concerned the District.  She did not give specific  details but other sources have made  public that the meeting involved several members of the “Union Power” slate and other Board of Directors. For example, it is indicated that  the Union Power slate members who attended the meeting with Deasy were: Cecily Myart-Cruz, Colleen Schwab and Daniel Barnhart. From the other group were present: Jose Lara and Ingrid Villeda.
In later  postings, teachers  began to ask questions about  this issue. In response, Ms. Villeda accused these teachers of spreading venom, distrust and rumors that only hurt the union. However, It is not Ms. Villeda’s  duty, in any way, to take unilateral action to meet with Dr. Deasy  regardless of how frustrating it could have been for her and other teachers that Mr. Fletcher did not take actions that she and her friends would have expected.  Instead of meeting with Deasy secretly, she should have forced Trygstad and Schwab to do the job that they were getting paid  to do by our union members to represent our members.If there were legal problems, why didn't the UTLA lawyers meet with Deasy to discuss any legal  issues? 
It is crystal clear that the meeting they had with Deasy had a purpose. As we can now see, most of those who met with Deasy are now  office. Let's not forget that The Union Power members visited a large number of  schools  during working hours for 43 days HEMLOCK ON THE ROCKS: MY DINNER WITH DEASY : The Unseemly Schemes of UTLA POWER SLATE andLAUSD's Scandal Barron, John Deasy:

Tuesday, December 16, 2014

Video: Jeopardy Names a Category “Common Core Math” | deutsch29

Video: Jeopardy Names a Category “Common Core Math” | deutsch29:



 Video: Jeopardy Names a Category “Common Core Math”

December 16, 2014





In its kids version, the game show Jeopardy makes fun of Common Core math via its category name of mental math problems as captured in this one-minute video clip:










Too straightforward for the nonsense that is now widely recognized as “Common Core math.” Now, if the answer involved Alex Trebecq moving sticky notes and engaging in philosophical discussions of The Meaning of Math–and if the prepackaged math materials were riddled with errors– that would be “Common Core math.” Video: Jeopardy Names a Category “Common Core Math” | deutsch29:


Geaux Teacher!: Open Letter to Louisiana Legislature Joint Education Committee Members

Geaux Teacher!: Open Letter to Louisiana Legislature Joint Education Committee Members:



Open Letter to Louisiana Legislature Joint Education Committee Members




Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
The controversy is raging as to the procurement of our Common Assessment.  John White submits that the test will be the PARCC test although there is no contract with Pearson who has been awarded the PARCC contract signed by Sec. Hannah Skandera of the New Mexico Department of Education on behalf of all PARCC states.  States must individually enter into this  contract with Pearson to acquire their own test.
 
Supt. White has created an untenable situation by misrepresenting our state assessment as the PARCC test.  Teachers and students are preparing for the PARCC test using materials provided by PARCC online and the Department of Education.   Our state participated in the PARCC field test last spring (which was free).  Under the circumstances, there is no way that Louisiana can administer a faux PARCC test and consider the results to be reliable or valid.  
 
 
I am providing you with some information regarding the special interests and conflicts that Supt. White and others appear to have regarding the procurement of this test through Pearson, Inc.  First I offer the latest information regarding the latest legal problems facing Pearson that should factor into any decision to do business with that corporation and should prompt you to question the propriety and legality of Louisiana's proposed procurement of the PARCC test through another provider, Data Recognition Corporation.  Please open the links provided for supporting evidence. 

***********
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-singer/pearson-education-can-run_b_6327566.html

Bad news for Pearson Education may be good news for the rest of us. The testing and publishing mega-giant is on the run, but it looks like it will not be able to hide. Pearson Education is closing its foundation; it is under investigation by the FBI for possible insider dealings in the Los Angeles iPad fiasco; the company is being sued by former employees for wrongful termination; and its PARCC exams are losing customers.

(A) Pearson's Foundation Closing

 Pearson has tried to give it a positive spin, but the reality is that Pearson the for-profit company is closing down its partner not-for-profit Pearson Foundation after having trouble with the law in both New York and California. In 2013, the Pearson Charitable Foundation paid $7.7 million in fines in New York State to reach an out-of-court settlement after the Office of the State Attorney General found the Foundation had broken state laws by generating business for the for-profit company.

According to the settlement agreement, "The Foundation's staff has consisted of Pearson employees; the Foundation's board was comprised entirely of Pearson executives until 2012; select Foundation programs have been conducted with the advice and participation of senior Pearson executives; and the Foundation continues to rely heavily upon Pearson Inc. for administrative support." While the Pearson Foundation neither admitted to nor denied the charges, it agreed to pay the fines.

In September 2014, Annie Gilbertson, education reporter for 88.3 KPCC, Southern California Public Radio, uncovered emails that appear to show complicity between officials in LAUSD, Pearson, the Pearson Foundation, representatives of Apple, and America Choice, a Pearson affiliate, to influence a LAUSD contract decision and circumvent the bidding process.

This was followed on November 18, 2014 by an announcement by the Pearson Charitable Foundation's Board of Directors of their "intent to cease Foundation operations and close the Pearson Foundation at the end of the year." They claimed that Pearson Education no longer needed "the Foundation as the primary vehicle for its philanthropic and community activities."

In an internal memo to Foundation employees that was passed along to me, Pearson promised to place many of them with other groups working on its projects and denied it was closing the Foundation "because it was unable to comply with the New York Attorney General settlement." It claimed that, "Over the last two years, Pearson has undertaken a review of all its business activities and investments, including its corporate responsibility activity. We feel strongly that there is significant potential to scale Pearson's social impact efforts by leveraging the full resources of our global operations, networks, and expertise." Maybe it is true; I just do not believe them, especially given the FBI investigation in Los Angeles.

(B) FBI Raid in Los Angeles

The Los Angeles Times reported that the Federal Bureau of Investigation had seized twenty boxes of records about the LAUSD's $1.3 billion plan to provide iPads to every student and a federal grand jury is examining the matter. A Geaux Teacher!: Open Letter to Louisiana Legislature Joint Education Committee Members:

Monday, December 15, 2014

Pearson Education Can Run, But It Cannot Hide | Alan Singer

Pearson Education Can Run, But It Cannot Hide | Alan Singer:



Pearson Education Can Run, But It Cannot Hide



Bad news for Pearson Education may be good news for the rest of us. The testing and publishing mega-giant is on the run, but it looks like it will not be able to hide. Pearson Education is closing its foundation; it is under investigation by the FBI for possible insider dealings in the Los Angeles iPad fiasco; the company is being sued by former employees for wrongful termination; and its PARCC exams are losing customers.
(A) Pearson's Foundation Closing 
Pearson has tried to give it a positive spin, but the reality is that Pearson the for-profit company is closing down its partner not-for-profit Pearson Foundation after having trouble with the law in both New York and California. In 2013, the Pearson Charitable Foundation paid $7.7 million in fines in New York State to reach an out-of-courtsettlement after the Office of the State Attorney General found the Foundation had broken state laws by generating business for the for-profit company. According to thesettlement agreement, "The Foundation's staff has consisted of Pearson employees; the Foundation's board was comprised entirely of Pearson executives until 2012; select Foundation programs have been conducted with the advice and participation of senior Pearson executives; and the Foundation continues to rely heavily upon Pearson Inc. for administrative support." While the Pearson Foundation neither admitted to nor denied the charges, it agreed to pay the fines.
In September 2014, Annie Gilbertson, education reporter for 88.3 KPCC, Southern California Public Radio, uncovered emails that appear to show complicity between officials in LAUSD, Pearson, the Pearson Foundation, representatives of Apple, and America Choice, a Pearson affiliate, to influence a LAUSD contract decision and circumvent the bidding process.
This was followed on November 18, 2014 by an announcement by the Pearson Charitable Foundation's Board of Directors of their "intent to cease Foundation operations and close the Pearson Foundation at the end of the year." They claimed that Pearson Education no longer needed "the Foundation as the primary vehicle for its philanthropic and community activities."
In an internal memo to Foundation employees that was passed along to me, Pearson promised to place many of them with other groups working on its projects and denied it was closing the Foundation "because it was unable to comply with the New York Attorney General settlement." It claimed that, "Over the last two years, Pearson has undertaken a review of all its business activities and investments, including its corporate responsibility activity. We feel strongly that there is significant potential to scale Pearson's social impact efforts by leveraging the full resources of our global operations, networks, and expertise." Maybe it is true; I just do not believe them, Pearson Education Can Run, But It Cannot Hide | Alan Singer:

'You Just Heard It!' We Must All Join the Great Truth-Telling Conversation | John Thompson

'You Just Heard It!' We Must All Join the Great Truth-Telling Conversation | John Thompson:



'You Just Heard It!' We Must All Join the Great Truth-Telling Conversation


We often hear that public education suffers from a "culture of compliance." I often add that the refusal of education leaders to speak obvious truths is due to the "blame game," which has created a culture of powerlessness. What I mean, but don't dare articulate, is that education across much or most of the nation is paralyzed by a culture of fear that gags even the best school leaders.
So, I was stunned by Oklahoma City Superintendent Rob Neu who proclaimed on the front page of the Daily Oklahoman that "We must face our current reality with brutal honesty." The constant criticism of the OKCPS has "stifled risk-taking and created an atmosphere of fear." Administrative turnover has created "a real-life game ofSurvivor."
Neu said that district's overall student performance is "bleak" and African-American students are "simply dying on the vine."
Then, the new superintendent addressed the "Great Conversation," which brings together students, civil rights and civil liberties organizations, religious coalitions, the Chamber of Commerce, the AFT/OK, conservatives, and liberals. He continued to express truths that I have never heard articulated in public (even though they are often expressed privately, off the record.) After a half dozen accurate, but daring statements, Neu punctuated his candid appraisal with the words, "You just heard it!"
We first heard the revelation that "African-American students are being passed on" while "Hispanic students are being exited." Superintendent Neu told stakeholders in our nearly 90% low-income district, "poverty is not a disability."
Neu said that the "blame game" could no longer be an option. Then, he tackled the issue which has inflicted the most pain on teachers. He began with the common statement that there is "no such thing as student failure." At that point, teachers across the nation tend to flinch reflectively, expecting to be blamed for each of our students' failure. But, the superintendent then asserted that a student's failure is "the system's failure!"
When he tackled sensitive issues, Mr. Neu was refreshingly explicit. He described complaints against the district by the United States Office of Civil Rights. Moreover, even if 46 percent of OKCPS students were not Hispanic, we would still need the dual language school initiative that is being introduced.
Mr. Neu was just warming up his honesty campaign. He described the problems created by the top-down management that too often accompanied grants by Silicon Valley entrepreneurs. He condemned the loss of 45 days of schooling, in part or in 'You Just Heard It!' We Must All Join the Great Truth-Telling Conversation | John Thompson:

Friday, December 12, 2014

Live Long and Prosper...: Tell Duncan He's Wrong!

Live Long and Prosper...: Tell Duncan He's Wrong!:



Tell Duncan He's Wrong!



Arne Duncan and the Obama Department of Education have redirected their attack on public schools to post-secondary schools of education. Duncan has proposed that colleges be judged based on the test scores of their graduates' students and the ability of their graduates to get hired. There is simply no research which indicates that this is an accurate measure of the success of a school of education. Simple common sense says that there are other factors which come into play...most notably, the socio-economic status of the children teachers teach. Poverty is the number one factor in student test scores, not their teachers' SAT scores or school of education.

Of course, it's important for teachers to be competent at what they do. Good training is vital, and why Duncan is going after schools of education instead of Teach for America is a topic for another post (think $$$).

In the meantime, using VAM to measure the effectiveness of schools of education is no more appropriate as using VAM to measure the effectiveness of classroom teachers. It is simply invalid.

Student achievement test scores should be used for tracking student achievement and determining the instructional needs of students. That is what achievement tests were designed for...and that's what they should be used for. Anyone who has ever learned anything about standardized tests ought to know that tests should be used only for that which they have been designed. Period.

You have a chance to tell Secretary Duncan how wrong he is.

Anthony Cody, a blogger, public education activist, author, teacher, and founding member of the Network for Public Education, writes...
We have a short window -- just until Jan. 2, to submit public comments for consideration by the Department of Ed in response to their proposed new regulations affecting teacher education.

These regulations are aimed at wiping out "ideological resistance" to high stakes tests.

The proposal states that the new regulations will evaluate teacher education programs based on the following criteria:
  • Employment outcomes: New teacher placement and three-year retention rates in high-need schools and in all schools.
  • New teacher and employer feedback: Surveys on the effectiveness of preparation.
  • Student learning outcomes: Impact of new teachers as measured by student growth, teacher evaluation, or both.
  • Assurance of specialized accreditation or evidence that a program produces high-quality candidates.
Please let the US DOE know that VAM is inappropriate for evaluating teachers, schools, school systems, and post secondary teacher training schools. Anthony Cody has all the information in his Live Long and Prosper...: Tell Duncan He's Wrong!:

parentingthecore | A Parent's Thoughts on Education in the Era of Reform

parentingthecore | A Parent's Thoughts on Education in the Era of Reform:



Credit_Karen_Apricot__Creative_Commons.JPG

Writing Off “Those Kids”

Just curious… does anyone else find this New York Times “Room For Debate” piece by Michael Petrilli, president of The Thomas B. Fordham Institute, which ran under the headline “Charters Can Do What’s Best For Students Who Care,” as breathtakingly offensive as I do? What boggles my mind is that this man is a leading voice among the so-called education reformers. His honesty is, at least, honest, I suppose. Unlike the DFERs, at least he’s not out there shouting that access to charter schools is the new civil rights movement of our time. He’s not out there suggesting that charter schools don’t cherry-pick and weed out students. So there’s that. I guess.
Instead, Petrilli’s saying that the fact that tax-dollar-funded charter schools kick out large numbers of students is “a feature, not a bug.” And that when it comes to discipline, “[t]raditional public schools that serve all comers have to find a middle ground, as best they can, which often pleases no one.”
And this guy is a thought-leader for the education reform movement.  His institute’s tagline is “Advancing Educational Excellence.”  I guess a more accurate version would read, “Advancing Education Excellent For Some.”
Judge for yourself.  Here are the money paragraphs from Petrilli:
Because [charter schools] are schools of choice, they have many advantages, including that everyone is there voluntarily. Thus they can make their discipline codes clear to incoming families (and teachers); those who find the approach too strict can go elsewhere.
This is a good compromise to a difficult problem: Not all parents (or educators) agree on how strict is too strict. Traditional public schools that serve all comers have to find a middle ground, as best they can, which often pleases no one. Schools of choice, including charters, need not make such compromises. That’s a feature, not a bug.
It’s not too strong to say that disruption is classroom cancer. It depresses achievement and makes schools unpleasant, unsafe and unconducive to learning. We need to think long and hard about taking tools away from schools — especially schools of choice — that allow their students to flourish.
In other words, we should divide students into those who care and those who don’t. We should provide resources to those who care, and warehouse the rest.  And when our public schools actually attempt to meet kids where they are and parentingthecore | A Parent's Thoughts on Education in the Era of Reform:

Charter Schools May Actually Be Re-Segregating America’s School System - In These Times

Charter Schools May Actually Be Re-Segregating America’s School System - In These Times:



Charter Schools May Actually Be Re-Segregating America’s School System

Charters’ defenders like to position themselves as 21st century civil rights activists. But a Delaware lawsuit alleges that charters are actually worsening racial inequality in the state.





Charter schools are often promoted as a tool to address educational inequities, but a potential precedent-setting legal case launched earlier this month says the opposite. In filings with the U.S. Department of Education, two Delaware nonprofit groups allege that some of the state's publicly funded, privately managed schools are actively resegregating the education system—and in a way that violates federal civil rights law.
The complaint, by the Delaware branch of the American Civil Liberties Union and the Community Legal Aid Society, cites data showing that more than three-quarters of Delaware's charter schools are “racially identifiable”—a term that describes schools whose demographics are substantially different from the surrounding community. 
According to the complaint, “High-performing charter schools are almost entirely racially identifiable as white” while “low-income students and students with disabilities are disproportionately relegated to failing charter schools and charter schools that are racially identifiable as African-American or Hispanic.” 
The groups are asking the Obama administration to take specific steps, including prohibiting subjective admissions policies for charter schools and barring extra fees for attending charter schools—factors they say discriminate against low-income, disabled and minority students. 
Because the case is being filed with the federal government, these actions could have implications for school districts everywhere—and there is already plenty of data tying charter schools to segregation. 
In 2010, a University of Colorado report analyzing charter schools found that “as compared with the public school district in which the charter school resided, the charter schools were substantially more segregated by race, wealth, disabling condition and language.” Similarly, in reviewing a decade worth of research about charter schools, George Washington University education researcher Iris Rotberg earlier this year concluded that “charter schools often lead to increased school segregation … and lead to the stratification of students who were previously in integrated environments.” 
Meanwhile, a General Accountability Office study in 2012 showed that “charter schools enrolled a lower percentage of students with disabilities than traditional public schools.”
The causes of educational segregation are a point of debate. Charter school defenders, for example, argue that the trends may merely reflect geography.
“A naive examination … appears to show that the critics are right: More choice is associated with minority students attending less diverse schools,” wrote the Brookings Institution's Matthew M. Chingos in his 2013 study of education data. “Of course, this relationship ignores the fact that charters tend to locate in areas that serve large shares of disadvantaged students and members of minority groups. As a result, this simple correlation tells us nothing about whether charters increase segregation or just tend to locate in areas where the schools are already segregated.”
Yet, in the Delaware case, the nonprofit groups blame charter schools' admissions requirements for effectively promoting discrimination. 
“These requirements include high examination scores, essays written by parents to explain why a school is a good choice for their child, access to gifted and talented elementary and middle school programs that help increase academic performance, annual activities fees, mandatory parent involvement and mandatory high-cost uniform purchases,” the ACLU said in astatement announcing the complaint. “Such barriers prevent students from low-income African-American and Hispanic families from having the same access to high-quality charter schools that middle- and upper-class families have.” 
In May, the Department of Education warned charter school administrators that their admissions policies “may not use Charter Schools May Actually Be Re-Segregating America’s School System - In These Times:

"Teach For America" Trojan Horse Among Ferguson Activists? | Black Agenda Report

"Teach For America" Trojan Horse Among Ferguson Activists? | Black Agenda Report:



"Teach For America" Trojan Horse Among Ferguson Activists?

by BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon


Some minor revisions and additional links have been inserted in this article since its Dece. 10 publication.
It's hard to imagine more ruthless, murderous and insanely wealthy corporate criminals than theKoch Bros. What if one of their executive vice presidents was black? What if she came from Florissant MO, only a few minutes from the spot where Michael Brown was murdered? What if the Koch VP had kicked it with some of the demonstrators and activists early on, maybe even taken an arrest or three, run around some corners and huffed some tear gas with them?
Now suppose that black Koch VP from Florissant got picked as one of the “young black leaders” whomet with President Obama at the White House last week. The black Koch VP does not offer to resign her position or denounce her employer, and the Koch Bros empire certainly won't stop doing any of the reprehensible things it does in Richmond CA, in Louisiana, and everywhere else in the world.
  1. Is this OK? Should the activists in motion over police murder of black people be good with this? Should they just look away and say well, the other stuff she's involved in, that her employer's involved in IS a concern butthis here is about the police. Should they say that concern ain't THIS concern, that concern ain't OUR concern???? Is this the way a broad new social movement against injustice and oppression is supposed to act?
  2. Can they really doubt that the Koch PR team will NOT use the black VP's participation in their movement to confuse and disadvantage oppressed people somewhere else?
  3. And would it be right for those with misgivings and questions about whether the Koch VP really belongs at the table, numbered among movement activists, to keep their reservations private, restricted to personal and closely held conference phone calls, private emails and the like? Or is this everybody's movement and therefore everybody's business, not just the affair of the designated "leaders"?
Something much like this is actually occurring around Ferguson. One of the “young black activists” who met with President Obama last week was Brittney Packnett, a Florissant native who happens to be executive director for the St. Louis office of Teach For America.
TFA is a nonprofit organization backed to the tune of hundreds of millions per year by Wal-Mart, the Broad Foundation, Monsanto and a long list of corporate villains and hedge fund predators intent upon dismantling, destroying and privatizing public education in black and brown neighborhoods, turning public education into a private profit center. Privatizing public education is also the bipartisan aim of top Republicans and Democrats across the country, so the Obama Department of Education has also provided tens of millions per year in federal funding for Teach For America.
Teach For America recruits young, mostly white grads from elite colleges to undergo a 5 week training program which supposedly enables them to replace experienced, mostly black teachers in inner city schools. Although TFA used to claim it sends its recruits to “underserved” schools where experienced teachers don't want to go, the facts are that underprepared TFA temps have replaced tens of thousands of experienced teachers in Newark, Chicago, St. Louis, and dozens of other cities around the country. Teach For America contends that inner-city public schools are NOT underfunded, that chronic poverty, joblessness, homelessness and short staffing are merely “excuses” used to protect the "bad teachers" which its mostly white temps are replacing. This is precisely the opposite of what knowledgeable young activists like the Dream Defenders Phillip Agnew will tell you.
For those not up on the criminal role Teach For America plays in black communities around the country, here are a few links....
In this context, the Teach For America rep sitting among the “young black activists” is a Trojan Horse.
No, it won't do any good to take Ms. Packnett aside and “talk to her” about this. That's naĆÆve. She has a 




 "Teach For America" Trojan Horse Among Ferguson Activists? | Black Agenda Report: