Latest News and Comment from Education

Thursday, July 31, 2014

Cigarette tax vote canceled; schools opening in jeopardy | Philadelphia Public School Notebook

Cigarette tax vote canceled; schools opening in jeopardy | Philadelphia Public School Notebook:



Cigarette tax vote canceled; schools opening in jeopardy

By Dale Mezzacappa on Jul 31, 2014 07:10 PM





Pennsylvania House Republicans have canceled a planned session on Monday to vote on a $2-a-pack cigarette tax in the city, jeopardizing the next school year for tens of thousands of students.
"Here we are again," said a frustrated Superintendent William Hite at a hastily called press conference Thursday afternoon.
Schools are now weeks from opening but without assurances that the District will have enough funds to operate a functional system, much less one that offers an acceptable education.
The same thing happened last year, and the city's schools still don't have a guarantee of reliable, recurring revenue sufficient to their needs.
Hite, Mayor Nutter, and City Council President Darrell Clarke all called the cancellation of the vote "devastating." House Republicans said they would come back on Sept. 15 instead, but Hite says he needs assurances of the money by Aug. 15 in order to forestall all kinds of operational decisions, including up to 1,300 layoffs.
"We support Dr. Hite's belief that ensuring schools are safe and adequately staffed is more important than opening schools as planned on September 8," Nutter and Clarke said in a joint statement.
In making the decision, House Republicans urged Gov. Corbett to advance money to the District, but Hite said that might be no help.
"I don't know what that advance means," he said. If it is simply advancing money earlier, rather than an infusion of new funds, "that doesn't help us...we still need Cigarette tax vote canceled; schools opening in jeopardy | Philadelphia Public School Notebook:

Advisory Commission on Special Education (ACSE) meeting agenda. (CA Dept of Education)

Agenda August 13 and 14, 2014 - Administration & Support (CA Dept of Education):



Agenda August 13 and 14, 2014

Advisory Commission on Special Education (ACSE) meeting agenda.



Advisory Commission on Special Education Members
  • Gina Plate, Chair
    Barbara Schulman, Vice Chair
    Feda Almaliti
    Mildred Browne
    Morena de Grimaldi 
    Kristi Hagans
    Somer Harding
    Sara Jocham
    Betty Karnette
    Matthew Navo
    Lester Pincu
    Nancy Portillo
    Mariano Sanz
    Jaclyn Vincent
    Steven Winlock
Student Members
  • Hyla Rachwal
Legislative Members
  • Carol Liu, Senate
  • Joan Buchanan, Assembly
State Board of Education
  • Carl Cohn, Liaison
State Special Schools
  • Scott Kerby, Director, State Special Schools and Services Division
    California Department of Education
Executive Secretary
  • Fred Balcom, Director, Special Education Division
    California Department of Education
Agenda Times Are Approximate and Are Provided for Convenience Only
All items may be re-ordered to be heard on any day of the noticed meeting. The order of business may be changed without notice.
Advisory Commission on Special Education
Schedule of MeetingLocation
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
10:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time ±
California Department of Education
1430 N Street, Room 1101
Sacramento, California
916-445-4602
Thursday, August 14, 2014
8:30 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time ±
California Department of Education
1430 N Street, Room 1101
Sacramento, California
916-445-4602
Please see the detailed agenda for more information about the items to be considered and acted upon. The public is welcome.
Guidelines for Public Input Sessions
The Commission welcomes public involvement. Opportunities for public comment are provided at every Commission meeting.
Reasonable Accommodation for Any Individual With a Disability
Pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, any individual with a disability who requires reasonable accommodation to attend or participate in a meeting or function of the Advisory Commission on Special Education (ACSE), may request assistance by contacting the Special Education Division, 1430 N Street, Suite 2401, Sacramento, CA, 95814; telephone, 916-445-4602; fax, 916-327-3706.

Advisory Commission on Special Education
Agenda, Wednesday, August 13, 2014, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time
California Department of Education
1430 N Street, Room 1101
Sacramento, California 
NOTE: Items not heard or completed on August 13, 2014, may be carried over to August 14, 2014.
10:00–10:15 a.m.
  • Call to Order–Roll Call
    Salute to the Flag
    Welcome New Members
    Communication and Announcements
    Review of Agenda and Meeting Standards
10:15–10:40 a.m.
Operations and Planning
  • ACSE 2014 Annual Report
  • Commissioner liaison reports on activities directly related to representation on behalf of the ACSE
  • ACSE appointing body liaison reports
10:40 a.m.–Noon
Commissioner Orientation Part 1: Commissioners will receive information including, but not limited to, statutory roles and responsibilities, state and federal requirements and guidelines, travel guidelines, Commission bylaws, liaison assignments, meeting regulations, role of the California Department of Education (CDE) in supporting the ACSE, Grazer Outstanding Achievement in Learning (GOAL) award, and operating procedures of the ACSE. 
Noon–1:00 p.m. LUNCH
1:00–2:15 p.m.
Commissioner Orientation Part 2: Commissioners will receive orientation and information on the legislative process, people first language, protocol for providing advice to appointing bodies, and important timelines.
NOTE: The orientation portions of the agenda will not be Webcast.
2:15–2:30 p.m. Type of Action: Information
Item 1−General Public Comment and Organizational Input: Public comment is invited on any matter notincluded on the agenda. The ACSE is precluded from discussing matters not included on the agenda; however, questions may be asked for clarification purposes. Issues raised by the public may be referred to a future meeting agenda for discussion. Depending on the number of individuals wishing to address the ACSE, the Chair may establish time limits on presentations.
2:30–3:15 p.m. Type of Action: Information, Discussion, Action
Item 2–Status Update: California State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) and Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Determination Letter for California. Shiyloh Duncan-Becerril; Education Administrator; Assessment, Evaluation and Support Unit; CDE, Special Education Division (SED).
  1. Review of 2013 State Performance Plan (SPP) indicators from 2013 Annual Performance Review (APR) to set the stage for new indicators and changes to federal requirements with Results Driven Accountability (RDA).
  2. Overview of 2014–15 State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) submission and 2013–14 data release timeline.
  3. Review of OSEP’s determination notice, CDE’s response, and implications of needs intervention status.
3:15–3:30 p.m. BREAK
3:30–4:00 p.m. Type of Action: Information, Discussion, Action
Item 3–Statewide Assessment Update: Report and status of Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) implementation and the status and timeline for National Center and State Collaborative (NCSC) assessment implementation for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Update on SBAC support to the field relating to accessibility and accommodations. Diane Hernandez, Director, Assessment Development and Administration Division, CDE.
4:00–4:30 p.m. Type of Action: Information, Discussion, Action
Item 4–Update from NCSC Community of Practice (COP): Supporting California teachers instructing students with disabilities in the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and CCSS update. Kristen Brown, Ph.D., Education Research and Policy Consultant, SED, CDE.
4:30–5:00 p.m. Type of Action: Information, Discussion
Item 5–California Youth Leadership Forum (YLF) and the Youth Voice. Report on California Youth Leadership Forum July 2014 and future activities related to supporting the training and employment of youth with disabilities in California. Rachel Stewart, Staff Services Manager, California Committee for Employment of People with Disabilities; Hyla Rachwal, ACSE Student Commissioner.
5:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment of day's session.

Advisory Commission on Special Education
Agenda, Thursday, August 14, 2014, 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time
California Department of Education
1430 N Street, Room 1101
Sacramento, California 
8:30–8:40 a.m.
  • Call to Order–Roll Call
  • Salute to the Flag
  • Communications and Announcements
  • Review of Agenda
8:40–9:10 a.m. Type of Action: Information, Discussion
Item 6–Ted Talk Video: Simon Sinek–Start with the Why External link opens in new window or tab.
9:10–9:40 a.m. Type of Action: Information, Discussion
Item 7−Review of Strategic Plan and ACSE Structure for 2014–2015.
9:45–11:30 a.m. Type of Action: Information, Discussion
Item 8−Legislative and Policy Committees: Commissioners will meet in two pre-assigned committee groups to discuss and prepare legislative and policy recommendations to be presented for consideration by the ACSE. Stakeholders and visitors are welcome to join either group and participate in roundtable discussion.
  • Legislative Committee: Review and update legislative platform and formulate recommendations for additions, amendments, or changes. Review current active legislation.
  • Policy Committee: Review bylaws and make specific recommendations for bylaw updates related to Student Commissioners and the GOAL Award.
11:30 a.m.–Noon Type of Action: Information, Discussion, Action
Item 9−Legislative and Policy Committees Reports and Recommendations
  • Legislative Committee: Recommendations and adoption of legislative platform
  • Policy Committee: Recommendations and adoption of proposed bylaw amendments
Noon.–1:15 p.m. LUNCH
1:15–1:45 p.m. Type of Action: Information
Item 10–General Public Comment and Organizational Input*: Public comment is invited on any matter notincluded on the agenda. The ACSE is precluded from discussing matters not included on the agenda; however, questions may be asked for clarification purposes. Issues raised by the public may be referred to a future meeting agenda for discussion. Depending on the number of individuals wishing to address the ACSE, the Chair may establish time limits on presentations.
*Time will be allocated to distance participant Parent Training Institutes to present issues of importance to parents. Stakeholders who wish to give public comment via the PTI may contact their local PTI prior to the meeting and advise them of their intent to comment. A listing of California’s federally funded Parent Training and Information Centers can be found at the California Parent Organizations Web page.
1:45–2:10 p.m. Type of Action: Information
Item 11–State Special Schools Division Report: Scott Kerby, Director, State Special Schools and Services Division, CDE.
2:10–2:35 p.m. Type of Action: Information
Item 12–State Special Education Director’s Report. Fred Balcom, Director, SED, CDE.
2:35–3:00 p.m. Type of Action: Information, Discussion, Action
Item 13–Agenda Building for October 2014 Meeting: Commissioners are invited to submit recommendations and suggestions for future meeting agenda items.
3:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT
Adjournment of day's session.
Adjournment of meeting. 
Related Content
  • ACSE Meeting Webcast - Live and recent Webcasts of the California Advisory Commission for Special Education (ACSE) Meeting.

4LAKids - some of the news that doesn't fit 7-31-14

4LAKids - some of the news that doesn't fit:







Is giving students laptops a terrible idea?: WHY ONE DISTRICT IS THROWING ALL ITS STUDENT LAPTOPS AWAY + smf’s 2¢
The Hechinger Report / By Jill Barshay  | http://bit.ly/1xH0mJN July 30, 2014 |   Inside Hoboken’s combined junior-senior high school is a storage closet. Behind the locked door, mothballed laptop computers are strewn among brown cardboard boxes. Others are stacked one atop another amid other computer detritus. Dozens more are stored on mobile computer carts, many of them on their last legs.




4LAKids - some of the news that doesn't fit 7-30-14
4LAKids - some of the news that doesn't fit: Pasadena Unified To File Lawsuit Against Acton-Agua Dulce Unified For Authorizing Charter School In PasadenaBy Hugo Guzman & Sarah Favot, The Pasadena Star-News | http://bit.ly/1lc2Av7 The Pasadena Unified School District school board voted to file a lawsuit against the Acton-Agua Dulce Unified School District for opening the SCALE Academy Charter S


7-31-14 Seattle Schools Community Forum

Seattle Schools Community Forum:







Stritikus Steps Down
Tom Stritikus announced that he is resigning his position as the Dean of the UW College of Education to accept a position with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.Here is his message to COE students and staff:Dear Students: I am writing to inform you that I will step down from the Deanship of the College of Education in early September. I’ve shared this news with Provost Cauce who is working on

"Do We Really Have a Problem Without a Solution"
(I'm hoping this will be a multi-part thread about public education in this country, where we are, where we are going and what should/could change.) I come to this thread thinking of two different things that really have nothing (but really everything) to do with public education. One is a song by the late Waylon Jennings (a great country/western singer) called Luckenbach, Texas.  In it, he is sin

7-30-14 Seattle Schools Community Forum
Seattle Schools Community Forum: An Alternative Narrative on TurnoverThe Seattle Times likes to peddle this story about how a fractious and meddling Board is the driving reason for the turnover of senior staff, including the superintendent, at Seattle Public Schools.It's a good yarn, but it doesn't actually fit the facts. It doesn't fit the facts becauseThe Board isn't all that fractious. Most vot





7-31-14 Schools Matter

Schools Matter: Member of FBI-Raided School Funds Todd Rokita AFTER the Raid:









Member of FBI-Raided School Funds Todd Rokita AFTER the Raid

by Doug Martin I mention Todd Rokita, the Indiana US congressman from the 4th district, in my book Hoosier School Heistbecause of his role with the Muslim Gulen charter schools recently raided by the FBI (see more on this at the end of this article). Since Rokita is up for election this year, I decided to peek into his campaign funding ("peek" because I merely touch the surface with what


7-29-14 Schools Matter All Week
Schools Matter: Evan Bayh Loves Christel DeHaan and Hedge Funders: CORPORATE SCHOOL ALERTby Doug Martin With so many people saying Evan Bayh must come back to Indiana to "save" public education as governor, it is time to set the record straight and let Hoosiers know about the real Evan Bayh. Here is just a glimpse (after only a few hours of research) into Indiana’s hero, Fox News' on-air




BADASS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION PROTEST RALLY RESULTS IN MEETING WITH U.S. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION ARNE DUNCAN

Badass Teachers Association:





BADASS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION PROTEST RALLY RESULTS IN MEETING 
WITH U.S. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION ARNE DUNCAN
 

--Call for National Teachers Congress--
--Halt to Destructive and Discriminatory Education Policies--
July 31, 2014, Washington, D.C.--U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan met with the Badass Teachers Association (BATs), a burgeoning grassroots organization, to gain an understanding of the concerns of the 50,000+ member group which has been highly critical of the Secretary’s policies. The BATs had been protesting outside the Department of Education (DOE) building on July 28, and met with the Secretary during a post-rally meeting which BATs had scheduled with senior staff in the DOE's Civil Rights department that same afternoon.
BATs articulated numerous concerns about Race to the Top policies. In addition to criticisms, they also suggested a way forward. Dr. Yohuru Williams, an author, historian and education activist from Connecticut, suggested the Secretary convene a “National Teachers Congress” to invite a frank discussion about policy concerns. DOE staffers promised to give the idea serious consideration.
BATs Co-Founder Mark Naison sounded the alarm on civil rights. Naison, a professor of African American Studies and History at Fordham University, said, “These policies, promoted with Civil Rights rhetoric, are riding roughshod over the civil rights of residents of inner city communities. School closings, privately run charter schools, chasing away teachers of color—all of these things are destroying our public schools, and they need to stop.”
When Secretary Duncan surprised BATs by joining the meeting, he asked specifically about BATs’ concerns about policies regarding special needs students. BATs General Manager Marla Kilfoyle responded.
“I told the Secretary what I know as a teacher and a mother of a special needs student,” said Kilfoyle. “The policies push schools to expose special needs students to abusive levels of testing, and force school districts to disregard individual student IEP’s,” Kilfoyle said. (IEPs are Individualized Education Plans which are required by law to help ensure special needs students gain greater access to curriculum).
Officials at the meeting seemed baffled by the intensity of anger teachers across the country have directed at the DOE. BATs explained that the Secretary fueled teacher mistrust by making statements showing disrespect for teachers from his support of the firings of Central Falls, Rhode Island teachers in
 2009, to his comments on Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans public schools, from his support of Cathy Black for NYC school chancellor to his recent endorsement of the Vergara decision undermining teacher due process in California.
“If provocative comments like these stop,” Naison said, “maybe teachers will regard the Department more favorably.”
When DOE officials insisted that school closings, charter school preferences, and the use of test scores to rate teachers and schools were not the sources of problems, Chicago parent activist Shoneice Reynolds and her 10-year-old son Asean Johnson described in depth how Chicago community schools were first starved, then closed, and replaced with privately run charter schools which were often limited in their programming and sometimes abusive in their discipline policies. They explained that the  result was stifling parent voices, depriving children of great neighborhood schools, and making Chicago neighborhoods more dangerous. Reynolds and Johnson have been outspoken in their criticism of Mayor Rahm Emanuel's implementation of DOE policies.
At the meeting, NEA BAT Caucus Liason Larry Proffitt, a middle school teacher, described how rating teachers on the basis of test scores was driving the best teachers out of the profession in almost every school district in his state of Tennessee and was severely constricting the curriculum.
DOE officials including Secretary Duncan and James Kim, of the Office of Civil Rights, promised future meetings with the BATs.
The rally earlier in the day drew over 500 teachers, parents, and education activists from 38 states. It marked the one-year anniversary of BATs, which started as a Facebook group that attracted 20,000 members within two weeks. A list of ten demands included ending Common Core State Standards.
“We spoke truth to power, without fear and without compromise,” Naison concluded. “We intend to continue doing just that. Whether they will listen, only time will tell.”

Additional information is available at http://badassteachers.blogspot.com and www.badassteachers.org. Spokespersons are available in every state and may be reached by emailing Marla Kilfoyle or Melissa Tomlinson at contact.batmanager@gmail.com.

Press Release written by CA BAT Karen WolfeBadass Teachers Association:

The End of Paper-and-Pencil Exams? - The Atlantic

The End of Paper-and-Pencil Exams? - The Atlantic:



The End of Paper-and-Pencil Exams?

In a recent pilot program, kids as young as 9 were asked to respond to online prompts and type out essays on a computer. 
Click Here to go to the WebsiteUnited Opt Out Team

Are fourth graders computer-savvy enough to have their writing skills measured in an online assessment? A new federal study suggests that they are, although it’s not clear whether old-fashioned paper and pencil exams might still yield useful results.
The National Assessment of Educational Progress, sometimes referred to as “The Nation’s Report Card,” is administered every two years to a representative sampling of students in grades 4, 8, and 12. Because each state uses its own mix of assessments, NAEP (along with the SAT and ACT college entrance exams) is one of the few ways of making comparisons nationally on student performance. NAEP expects to be a fully online assessment by 2017.
In preparation for that shift, the National Center on Education Statistics tested an early version of an online writing assessment on 60 fourth graders to gauge their comfort level with the platform and design. After identifying common issues that students were struggling with, the pilot online writing assessment was eventually redesigned. Among the changes: swapping out a drop-down menu for icons, and giving students more frequent – and shorter – prompts. That assessment was then administered to 13,000 fourth graders. 
Students were asked to respond to prompts that required one of three modes of writing:
  • Persuade: Write a letter to your principal, giving reasons and examples why a particular school mascot should be chosen.
  • Explain: Write in a way that will help the reader understand what lunchtime is like during the school day.
  • Convey: While you were asleep, you were somehow transported to a sidewalk underneath the Eiffel Tower. Write what happens when you wake up there. 
Because it was not a representative sampling, NCES has cautioned against drawing conclusions about the online assessment, or the students’ performance.
With that caveat, here are a few of the findings from the pilot study:
  • On a scale of 1 to 6, just over 60 percent of students scored a 3 or higher on the assessment. NAEP officials say that means “the majority of students wrote enough to be assessed, included ideas that were mostly on topic and used simple organizational strategies in most of their writing.”
  • Students scored higher when they had more time – 30 minutes vs. 20 minutes – to construct their responses.
  • Nearly all students – 92 percent – said they had previously taken some form of an online assessment.
While this may only have been a pilot study, it’s clear that many of the students The End of Paper-and-Pencil Exams? - The Atlantic:

7-31-14 Wait What? - Jonathan Pelto: Gubernatorial Candidate and A Really Nice Guy

Wait What?:



Wait What?
Pelto-Murphy
Pelto/Murphy 2014




You know that line between being “pushy” and “annoying”?
Well here is the – we’ve got less than 6 days to go – and we still need more signatures to ensure we have enough names (and a buffer) to get on the November ballot. If every person who has written in support of the Pelto/Murphy campaign collected 10 signatures – we’d be well over […] The post You know that line between being “pushy” and “annoying”? appeared first on Wait What?.

Self-proclaimed as “America’s Most Trusted Educator,” Steve Perry says he is opening a charter school in NYC?
According to his PR operation, “Dr. Steve Perry, and the founders of what US News & World Reports has called one of America’s top high schools, are coming to Harlem.” Despite the fact that Perry and his “team” are full-time employees of the Hartford Board of Education, Steve Perry’s media statement explains that, “The Capital […] The post Self-proclaimed as “America’s Most Trusted Educator,” S

7-29-14 Wait What? - Jonathan Pelto: Gubernatorial Candidate and A Really Nice Guy
Wait What?: Wait What?: Pelto/Murphy 2014Pelto/Murphy 2014 Petition Signing Tues and Wed (Bushnell Park – near the food trucks 11am – 1pm)Reminder: Looking for an opportunity to ensure that our voices are heard in this year’s gubernatorial election? If you are in the area, swing by Bushnell Park from 11:00am  to 1:00pm today or tomorrow. We’ll be near the food trucks. You signature will allow us t

2012 Campaign Cash Scandal Ends With PAC’s Shutdown | KQED News Fix

2012 Campaign Cash Scandal Ends With PAC’s Shutdown | KQED News Fix:



2012 Campaign Cash Scandal Ends With PAC’s Shutdown



In a quiet ending to one of the most high-profile campaign money controversies in California history, the political action committee reprimanded for accepting $11 million from mystery donors in 2012 has closed its doors.
The political arm of the Small Business Action Committee (SBAC) filed official termination papers on Monday, six months after agreeing to hand over $300,000 in campaign cash to state officials for accepting what turned out to be the largest anonymous donation to a political effort in California history.
The group’s backers agreed to the settlement, but disagree with the enforcement effort that led to it.
“We still feel that the law has unconstitutional aspects to it,” said Joel Fox, president of the SBAC, in a telephone interview.
Fox’s group was a principal opponent of Gov. Jerry Brown’s 2012 tax increase initiative and is a longtime player in California political campaigns opposed to tax hikes. He argues the rules that require the repayment of money spent on what was legal political activity — from mailers to TV ads — probably wouldn’t pass muster in the courts because of the possibility that it would mute a group’s right to freedom of political speech.
“How do you take that speech back?” asked Fox.
The shutdown of the Small Business Committee’s PAC was a matter of necessity for Fox’s group: Had the PAC remained in operation, every new dollar it raised would have had to be handed over to the state, up to $11 million — the amount of the original contribution SBAC accepted from what turned out to be a network of opaque nonprofits with links to conservative billionaires Charles and David Koch.
In all, three out-of-state nonprofit groups funneled $16 million into the effort to beat Brown’s Proposition 30 and pass Proposition 32, an effort to curb union political power that voters ultimately rejected.
The case highlighted the complex and secretive way political money now moves through ‘social welfare’ groups.
The case highlighted the complex and secretive way political money now moves through 501(c)(4) organizations, designated by the IRS as “social welfare” groups and allowed to keep confidential the identity of their donors. In all, $29 million was collected by a Virginia-based nonprofit to influence California political campaigns in 2012. Most of that money was then transferred to an Arizona-based 501(c)(4) and ultimately funneled into two California political campaigns, the most prominent being the campaign run by the SBAC.
Last October, state officials imposed a $1 million fine in the case while also ordering four groups to hand over $15 million in tainted money — which, because the money had already been spent on the 2012 campaigns, effectively meant that the groups were required to pay it back.
In January, SBAC agreed to hand over $300,000, leaving it $10.7 million short of the settlement. State officials admitted that they had no way to compel the group to make up the difference.
The reality was that if SBAC shuttered its campaign committee, as it did on Monday, it would be the 2012 Campaign Cash Scandal Ends With PAC’s Shutdown | KQED News Fix:

Why Teachers Need Tenure. Part 1 southbronxschool

http://www.southbronxschool.com:



Why Teachers Need Tenure. Part 1


With all the talk of the lawsuit Campbell Brown and her lackies Mona Davids and Sam Pirozzolo have brought forth, the reason to explain tenure has never been more important than ever.

This story came into the DTOE newsroom a few weeks ago., and posted on DTOEthis past Tuesday. This is one of the most heinous examples of teacher abuse and abuse of power The Crack Team has heard of. In fact, Crack Team member Moose was so upset he was crying like a baby while sucking his thumb and calling for his mother.

This story, told from the teacher involved, has all the markings of what is the problem in education. Not the teachers, but the ones in charge, the ones making the decisions.

The letter to follow (In it's entirety) was originally sent to High Schools Superintendent Donald Conyers. Donald was at the forefront of damage to this teacher (here and here).

Coincidentally, Conyers worked closely with DR Mychael Willon. He of the false PhD and the arrest forhttp://www.southbronxschool.com:

New Web Site: Student Privacy Matters - Parent Coalition for Student Privacy

Student Privacy Matters:



OUR LETTER TO CONGRESS



Today, our Parent Coalition for Student Privacy launched.  Our letter to Congress urging them to strengthen federal student privacy protections ishere (pdf) and below; our press release is here.
July 23, 2014
Dear member of Congress:
We write on behalf of a broad coalition of parents across the country to urge Congressional review of emerging threats to student privacy rights and to request legislative action to address significant shortcomings in current law. Specifically, we are alarmed about ill-thought-through federal policies that, instead of providing safeguards against non-consensual disclosure and downstream uses of children’s personally identifiable information, actually promote policies in which a child’s highly sensitive personal data is disclosed to third-parties for purposes that go well beyond reasonable educational uses and deny parents the right of notification or consent.
First, we respectfully urge Congress to hold hearings on why the U.S. Department of Education has abdicated its historic role as the guardian of educational privacy rights. In responding to interest groups that included Big Data enthusiasts, influential foundations and their grantees, and educational technology firms, the Departmenthas re-interpreted (and, in effect, unilaterally amended) the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 to nullify many of its most important privacy protections. This radical re-invention of FERPA is at the root of much of the data free-for-all that has resulted in massive amounts of personally identifiable student data being collected and divulged to third parties, including for-profit vendors.
As the controversy over one such third party, inBloom, has revealedthere is a wide gap between the view of most parents that they should be able to control access to their children’s personal information to protect their privacy and safety, and the perspective of various governmental agencies and private corporations that are intent on collecting and using that data without informing parents or providing them with the right to consent.
The inBloom data-mart, funded with $100 million from the Gates Foundation, sought to capture records of millions of children to enable the creation of a market in technological learning tools that would utilize and data-mine this information in name of “personalized learning.” Parents mobilized in opposition because they justly feared that the transmission and storage of their children’s most personal data on data clouds, as well as inBloom’s stated intent to provide it to a large number of for-profit vendors, was both a security and a privacy threat.
We are pleased to say that parental concerns and protests won the day over the poor judgment of state and district education officials, resulting in inBloom being driven out of business. But sadly, many other vendors seek to take inBloom’s place or to sell their wares directly to schools and districts with inadequate protections for security or privacy, and very little respect for parental rights.
Second, we respectfully urge Congress to review privacy and security practices of the multiple state longitudinal data systems created in direct response to various federal programs in recent years. These data systems are designed to collect, store and share an increasing amount of children’s personal information among a variety of state agencies and to track students over time without sufficient oversight and protections for privacy.
Finally, we respectfully urge Congress to review and strengthen both FERPA and Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), to roll back the harmful provisions of the 2009 and 2011 FERPA regulations, and to update both laws in light of new and unforeseen threats to privacy rights. Particularly with the growth of the educational technology industry, there has been a huge push to expand the access to personal student data with little or no federal restrictions to slow down this trend. We are dissatisfied with the recommendations of the recent White House report on privacy that evades most of the important issues and simply asserts that any student data disclosed to third parties should be used only for “educational purposes.” This generic statement is far too vague to be reassuring.
The push for greater access to educational data is motivated by the desire of the educational technology sector to develop new products and grow their market, as well as by advocates who claim that big data will revolutionize education. We believe parents—not school officials—should be in charge of deciding whether or how much of their children’s information may be shared with vendors. The benefits of big-data and data-mining software in the area of education are still highly hypothetical and cannot be used to justify the massive amount of personal data that is being collected and shared with third parties without parental knowledge or consent.
Many parents do not want their children to spend hours more each day in front of a computer and do not believe that the model of mechanized instruction that is being promoted can deliver true personalized learning. We certainly do not want our children’s disability, health and disciplinary records shared widely with third parties.
We believe that any legislation should uphold the following principles:
  • Minimize the collection by governmental agencies of highly sensitive student data and their ability to share this data with third parties;
  • Maximize the opportunities for parental notification and consent;
  • Except in very limited circumstances, restrict non-consensual access to personal student data to education authorities and roll back the 2012 “authorized representative” loophole, by which nearly anyone can be designated as an authorized representative of officials entitled to its access;
  • Mandate strict security provisions for the storage and transmission of personal student data, regular audits, and the training of education personnel about the need to maintain robust privacy and security provisions;
  • Ensure that the law is enforceable, including but not limited to the ability of the federal government to impose fines and families to sue if their children’s privacy is violated.
We urge you to open up a dialogue with parents as soon as possible. Since inBloom’s demise, much has been written about the importance of including parents in the debate over how to protect their children’s privacy yet very little has been done to involve them in the discussion. We thank you for your leadership and stand ready to work with you on this important issue.