HISD MEATAXE MIKE MILES CUTS CURRICULUM DEPARTMENT THEN FINDS "PORN" IN SCRIPTED LESSONS

 

HISD MEATAXE MIKE MILES CUTS CURRICULUM DEPARTMENT THEN FINDS "PORN" IN SCRIPTED LESSONS

Oh, boy! Have you heard the latest news from the Houston Independent School District (HISD)? It's a real doozy, folks! Apparently, there's been a bit of a scandal involving an eighth-grade reading assignment. And let me tell you, it's a doozy!

So, here's the lowdown. The assignment in question contained some mature content. We're talking about a passage from none other than the legendary Maya Angelou herself. Now, normally, that would be cause for celebration. Maya Angelou is a literary icon, after all. But this particular passage depicted a scene between a man and a woman in a hotel room. And guess what? It included references to drinking whiskey and passion. Whiskey and passion, people! In an eighth-grade reading assignment! Can you believe it?

Naturally, the district was quick to respond. They discovered the inappropriate material before it was distributed, thank goodness. But here's the kicker: the Houston Federation of Teachers Union offered their help to the district, and they said no! Can you believe it? The teachers union, trying to lend a hand, and they turned them down. Talk about a missed opportunity!

Now, the poor teachers are left to pick up the pieces. They have to spend their valuable time reviewing, correcting, and rewriting materials to ensure that students get accurate and appropriate resources. I mean, come on! These teachers have enough on their plates already. They don't need this added stress.

But fear not, my friends! The HISD has taken some action. They've hired 25 out of the 32 teachers needed to review lesson plans. Progress, right? And they're even launching opportunities for teachers to partner with district leaders and provide feedback to make their curriculum stronger. Well, it's about time!

But let's not forget who's ultimately to blame for this whole mess. That's right, folks. It's none other than Superintendent Mike Miles. I mean, seriously, Mike? Cutting the curriculum department? What were you thinking? Maybe old MeatAxe Mike should change his name to Magic Mike because he sure knows how to make things disappear!

But in all seriousness, it's good to see that steps are being taken to rectify this situation. Our students deserve the best education possible, and that means having access to appropriate and engaging materials. So let's hope that the HISD can learn from this incident and ensure that it never happens again.

In the meantime, let's give a round of applause to those hardworking teachers who are going above and beyond to make sure our kids get the education they deserve. They're the real heroes in this story. And Maya Angelou? Well, she'll always be a literary legend, even if her work occasionally finds its way into eighth-grade classrooms.

So there you have it, folks. The scandal that rocked the HISD. Whiskey, passion, and a whole lot of drama. Who said education was boring?

HISD curriculum: Teachers blame Superintendent Mike Miles for inappropriate reading assignment ending up in 8th-grade classroom - ABC13 Houston https://abc13.com/hisd-superintendent-mike-miles-8th-grade-handout-inappropriate-reading-assignment-in-school/13864152/ 

HISD curriculum: Teachers blame Superintendent Mike Miles for inappropriate reading assignment ending up in 8th-grade classroom - ABC13 Houston https://abc13.com/hisd-superintendent-mike-miles-8th-grade-handout-inappropriate-reading-assignment-in-school/13864152/ 

TEACHERS PAY PENALTY REACHES RECORD HIGH, BILLIONAIRES CELEBRATE DEFUNDING PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND CRUSHING TEACHERS SPIRITS

 

TEACHERS PAY PENALTY REACHES RECORD HIGH

BILLIONAIRES CELEBRATE DEFUNDING PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND CRUSHING TEACHERS SPIRITS

Attention all billionaires! Are you tired of public education being accessible to the masses? Sick of teachers having livable wages and benefits? Well, have no fear, the Billionaires Playbook for Destroying Public Education is here!

First on the agenda, defund schools. Why waste money on educating the youth when you could be using it to buy another yacht? It's simple economics, really. Plus, think of all the tax breaks you'll get for donating to private schools instead.

Next up, tell teachers they must take a vow of poverty to teach in America. Who needs money when you have the satisfaction of molding young minds? Plus, if they're poor, they won't be able to afford to unionize and demand higher wages. It's a win-win!

But wait, there's more! According to a new report by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), teachers are already making 26% less in income than other professionals with similar education levels. Let's make that gap even wider! The report even refers to it as a "pay penalty" for teachers. Ha! Who needs fair wages when you have the joy of grading papers and dealing with unruly students?

And let's not forget about those pesky right-wing groups attacking teachers. We can't have them advocating for better working conditions and wages. So, let's just make it impossible for them to do so by making sure they're too poor to even consider it.

But wait, there's even more! The report also found that the pay penalty for women teachers has widened since the mid-1990s to reach 21.3% this year, while the pay gap for men teachers was 36.6%. We can't have equality in education AND in pay, now can we? Let's keep those women and men in their place.

And as an added bonus, fewer college graduates will choose teaching as a career. Who needs educated and passionate teachers when you can have underpaid and overworked ones?

But don't worry, billionaires, we've got your back. With our playbook, you'll be able to destroy public education and ensure that only the elite have access to quality education. Just remember, money talks and education walks.

EXCERPTS FROM THE BILLIONAIRES PLAYBOOK: 

1. First things first, we need to make sure that schools are severely underfunded. After all, how can teachers do their jobs properly if they don't have the resources they need? And don't worry about the students. They'll figure it out. Or they won't. Who cares?
2. Next up, we need to make sure that teachers are paid as little as possible. After all, why pay someone a decent wage when you can just exploit their passion for teaching? And if they complain about their low pay, just tell them to take a vow of poverty. It's not like they became teachers to make money or anything.
3. Ah, the 'Pay Penalty'. This is one of our favorite tactics. Basically, we make sure that teachers are paid significantly less than other similarly educated professionals. That way, people who are smart enough to become doctors or lawyers won't even consider teaching as a career option. Brilliant, right?
4. Let's face it, education is overrated. Who needs critical thinking skills or the ability to read and write when you can just throw money at a problem? And if students struggle in school, well, that's their problem. We'll just blame it on their lack of motivation or intelligence.
5. After years of defunding schools, exploiting teachers, and ignoring students, public education is in shambles. But don't worry, fellow billionaires. We've won again. And the best part? We didn't even have to lift a finger.

Teacher ‘Pay Penalty’ Reaches Record High | NEA https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/teacher-pay-penalty-reaches-record-high

Pay Gap Between Teachers, Other Professionals, Is Widest Since 1960s — Report | Truthout https://truthout.org/articles/pay-gap-between-teachers-other-professionals-is-widest-since-1960s-report/ 

Teacher pay penalty still looms large: Trends in teacher wages and compensation through 2022 | Economic Policy Institute https://www.epi.org/publication/teacher-pay-in-2022/#:~:text=Key%20findings,increase%20from%206.1%25%20in%201996. 

Teacher pay penalty still looms large - Trends in teacher wages and compensation through 2022 https://files.epi.org/uploads/274103-overview.pdf

Education Research Report: Teacher pay penalty still looms large https://educationresearchreport.blogspot.com/2023/10/teacher-pay-penalty-still-looms-large.html 

OHIO EDUCATION: FROM A.B.C.S TO MAGA-ZED - THE ALPHABET SOUP OF CHAOS (AKA FLAMING VOUCHERS)

OHIO EDUCATION: FROM A.B.C.S TO MAGA-ZED - THE ALPHABET SOUP OF CHAOS (AKA FLAMING VOUCHERS)

Ohio's education system has become the center of attention, and it's not because they've discovered a new way to teach math that actually makes sense. No, it's because Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine has passed a bill that is hell-bent on destroying the public school system. And, let's be honest, who needs an educated populace anyway? Ignorance is bliss, right?

The bill, known as HB 33, is part of the state's budget bill, and it's causing quite a stir. The policy would transfer much of the power from the Board of Education, which includes publicly elected officials, to a governor-appointed director who would then appoint deputy directors. This has caused seven board members to file a lawsuit against its enforcement, claiming that it's unconstitutional.

But, let's be real, who needs democracy when you have a governor-appointed director? It's not like the people of Ohio have any say in how their education system is run. And who needs local control when you can have a governor-appointed director? It's not like the people who actually live in the community know what's best for their kids.

Opponents of the bill argue that it will undermine public education, democracy, and local control in Ohio. They assert that the overhaul will violate the state constitution, which grants the OSBE the authority to supervise public education in Ohio. They also argue that the overhaul will diminish the voice of voters, parents, teachers, and students in education matters, and give too much power to the governor and business interests.

But who needs voters, parents, teachers, and students when you can have the governor and business interests making all the decisions? It's not like they have any ulterior motives or anything.

The opponents of the bill fear that it will lead to more privatization, standardization, testing, and inequity in Ohio's education system. But who needs equity when you can have a two-tiered education system where only the rich can afford to send their kids to private schools? It's not like education is a right or anything.

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine announced that although a court order had delayed a Republican-backed overhaul of the state's K-12 education system, part of it would still take effect. A lawsuit challenging the overhaul argued that it violated the constitution, and a court magistrate ordered a temporary restraining order until a judge could decide to put it on hold indefinitely.

But who needs courts when you have a governor-appointed director? It's not like they'll be biased or anything.

DeWine stated that the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce would replace the Ohio Department of Education, ensuring that necessary operations such as school funding and approval of voucher applications would continue. The new department would function despite the court order, DeWine added, but his office would not take any affirmative action on major decisions still pending, such as appointing a new director of the department.

But who needs checks and balances when you have a governor-appointed director? It's not like they'll abuse their power or anything.

The law is currently facing a legal challenge in the Ohio Supreme Court. A group of plaintiffs, including the Ohio Education Association and the League of Women Voters, argue that the law is unconstitutional because it gives the governor too much power over the state's education system. The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the case in the coming months.

But who needs the Supreme Court when you have a governor-appointed director? It's not like they'll be biased or anything.

In summary, Ohio's education system is being overhauled by a bunch of right-wing goodies who are hell-bent on destroying public education. But who needs public education when you can have privatization, standardization, testing, and inequity? It's not like education is important or anything. And who needs democracy when you can have a governor-appointed director? It's not like the people of Ohio have any say in how their education system is run. 

So sit back, relax, and watch as Ohio's education system goes up in flames. It's going to be a wild ride.

How Ohio's overhaul of K-12 schooling became a flashpoint - ABC News https://abcnews.go.com/US/overhaul-12-education-center-lawsuit-ohio/story?id=103655330 

DeWine says new education department can exist, despite court order https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/politics/2023/10/02/gov-mike-dewine-to-speak-at-515-about-education-department-lawsuit/71036139007/

Part of Ohio's GOP-backed K-12 education overhaul to take effect | 10tv.com https://www.10tv.com/article/news/local/ohio/part-of-ohios-gop-backed-k-12-education-overhaul-take-effect-despite-court-order/530-c57b3054-6c23-470d-9cbb-8922509adc16 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI

Ohio's GOP-backed K-12 education overhaul, signed into law by Governor Mike DeWine in March 2023, is one of the most significant changes to the state's education system in decades. The law makes a number of changes, including:

• * **Shifting oversight of the state education department from the elected Ohio State Board of Education to a director appointed by the governor.** The law also creates a new cabinet-level position of Secretary of Education and Workforce Development, who will oversee the new education department.
• * **Giving the governor more power over the state's education curriculum.** The law requires the governor to appoint a new State Board of Education, which will be responsible for setting academic standards. The law also gives the governor the power to veto any changes to the state's curriculum.
• * **Expanding school choice options for families.** The law creates a new scholarship program that will allow students to attend private schools using public funds. The law also expands the state's existing voucher program and makes it easier for charter schools to open.
• * **Requiring teachers to undergo more training on topics such as civics and social justice.** The law also requires teachers to post their lesson plans online and to allow parents to opt their children out of lessons that they find objectionable.

The law has been met with mixed reactions from education stakeholders. Supporters of the law argue that it will give parents more control over their children's education and improve the quality of education in Ohio. Opponents of the law argue that it will give the governor too much control over the state's education system and that it will harm public schools.

The law is currently facing a legal challenge in the Ohio Supreme Court. A group of plaintiffs, including the Ohio Education Association and the League of Women Voters, argue that the law is unconstitutional because it gives the governor too much power over the state's education system. The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the case in the coming months.

Regardless of the outcome of the legal challenge, the Ohio's GOP-backed K-12 education overhaul is a significant change to the state's education system. The law is likely to have a major impact on students, parents, teachers, and administrators across Ohio.

In addition to the changes listed above, the law also includes a number of other provisions, such as:

• * **Creating a new accountability system for schools.** The law requires the state to develop a new system for measuring school performance. The system will take into account factors such as student test scores, graduation rates, and chronic absenteeism.
• * **Providing more funding for early childhood education.** The law increases funding for Ohio's Early Head Start program, which provides early childhood education services to low-income families.
• * **Expanding access to mental health services for students.** The law requires schools to provide mental health assessments to students who are struggling academically or behaviorally. The law also provides funding for schools to hire more mental health counselors and social workers.

The law is still in its early stages of implementation, so it is too early to say what its long-term impact will be. However, the law has the potential to significantly change the way that education is delivered in Ohio.

FROM BING AI

Ohio's GOP-backed K-12 education overhaul is a controversial legislation that aims to restructure the state's education system and create a new department of education and workforce. The overhaul was passed as part of the state budget in June 2023 and was supposed to take effect on October 1, 2023. However, a lawsuit filed by seven Ohio State Board of Education members and some parents challenged the constitutionality of the overhaul and sought to block its implementation. A county judge issued a temporary restraining order on September 21, 2023, halting the overhaul until further notice.

The main features of the overhaul are:

• - It abolishes the Ohio Department of Education (ODE) and replaces it with the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce (DEW), which will be headed by a director appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate. The director will have broad powers over the state's education policies, standards, assessments, funding, and accountability.
• - It reduces the size and role of the Ohio State Board of Education (OSBE), which is currently composed of 19 members, 11 elected and eight appointed by the governor. The overhaul reduces the number of elected members to five, one from each congressional district, and eliminates the appointed members. The OSBE will no longer have authority over the state superintendent of public instruction, who will be appointed by the DEW director. The OSBE will also lose its oversight over charter schools, vouchers, and other education programs.
• - It creates a new Ohio Commission on Student Success (OCSS), which will consist of 15 members appointed by the governor, legislative leaders, and business groups. The OCSS will advise the DEW director on various education issues, such as curriculum, graduation requirements, career pathways, workforce development, and data collection.

The proponents of the overhaul argue that it will bring more efficiency, accountability, and innovation to Ohio's education system, which they say is failing to meet the needs of students and employers in the 21st century. They claim that the overhaul will streamline the bureaucracy, reduce political interference, align education with workforce demands, and empower local districts and schools to make decisions that best suit their communities.

The opponents of the overhaul contend that it will undermine public education, democracy, and local control in Ohio. They assert that the overhaul will violate the state constitution, which grants the OSBE the authority to supervise public education in Ohio. They also argue that the overhaul will diminish the voice of voters, parents, teachers, and students in education matters, and give too much power to the governor and business interests. They fear that the overhaul will lead to more privatization, standardization, testing, and inequity in Ohio's education system.

Bing, 10/3/2023

• (1) Part of Ohio’s GOP-backed K-12 education overhaul will take effect despite court order. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/part-of-ohios-gop-backed-k-12-education-overhaul-will-take-effect-despite-court-order/ar-AA1hBj0k.
• (2) Ohio judge puts massive GOP-backed education overhaul on hold. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ohio-judge-puts-massive-gop-backed-education-overhaul-hold.
• (3) Overhaul of Ohio's K-12 Education System Is Unconstitutional, New Lawsuit Says. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/ohio/articles/2023-09-19/overhaul-of-ohios-k-12-education-system-is-unconstitutional-new-lawsuit-says.
• (4) Part of Ohio's GOP-Backed K-12 Education Overhaul Will Take Effect .... https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/ohio/articles/2023-10-02/part-of-ohios-gop-backed-k-12-education-overhaul-will-take-effect-despite-court-order.
• (5) Part of Ohio's GOP-backed K-12 education overhaul will take effect .... https://apnews.com/article/ohio-education-state-board-overhaul-lawsuit-8c31c3714d122490c8f1bd2a4891aa84.
• (6) Ohio judge puts massive GOP-backed education overhaul on hold. https://www.allsides.com/news/2023-09-22-0830/politics-ohio-judge-puts-massive-gop-backed-education-overhaul-hold.
• (7) Ohio Judge Issues Temporary Restraining Order, Halting GOP-Backed K-12 .... https://www.bollyinside.com/news/education/ohio-judge-issues-temporary-restraining-order-halting-gop-backed-k-12-education-overhaul/.
• (8) GOP-proposed overhaul of Ohio's education system clears Senate .... https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-proposed-overhaul-ohios-education-system-clears-senate-committee-vote-full-senate.
• (9) Ohio Senate panel Oks bill to overhaul education oversight - WOUB. https://woub.org/2023/03/01/an-ohio-senate-panel-oks-a-bill-to-overhaul-ohios-education-oversight/.
• (10) Judge temporarily blocks overhaul of Ohio's K-12 educational system. https://www.wcpo.com/news/state/state-ohio/judge-temporarily-blocks-overhaul-of-ohios-k-12-educational-system.

SCHOOL BOARD MEETING TURNS INTO JERRY SPRINGER EPISODE THANKS TO KAREN

 

SCHOOL BOARD MEETING TURNS INTO JERRY SPRINGER EPISODE THANKS TO KAREN

It's a tale as old as time: you elect a Karen to the school board, and suddenly you're knee-deep in restraining orders and court appearances. Such is the case with Darbi "Karen" Boddy, a conservative member of the Lakota school board who has caused quite the stir in her short time in office.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But wait, isn't 'Karen' just a derogatory term for entitled white women who demand to speak to the manager?" And while that may be true, it's also a fitting description for Ms. Boddy, who seems to relish in causing drama and making outrageous claims.

Let's start at the beginning. Ms. Boddy was elected to the Lakota school board in 2021, along with fellow conservative Isaac Adi. From the get-go, she made her presence known by spreading false and inflammatory claims about the district's curriculum, diversity initiatives, and LGBTQ+ issues. It's almost as if she was trying to stir up controversy for the sake of it.

In April 2022, Ms. Boddy took things to a whole new level when she posted a typo on Facebook that led to a pornographic website. She claimed that students were being exposed to inappropriate sexual materials at school, which the district and other board members denied. Needless to say, this did not go over well with her colleagues or the community at large.

The board censured Ms. Boddy and asked her to resign, but she refused. She also faced backlash from parents and community members who called for her removal. But that didn't stop her from attending a conference in Sarasota, Florida, hosted by The Leadership Institute, a conservative organization that trains conservatives on how to campaign, fundraise, and organize.

At the conference, Ms. Boddy allegedly embarrassed Mr. Adi and the Lakota School District by making a scene in front of other attendees. She also accused Mr. Adi of voting against her on LGBTQ+ issues and grabbed the microphone from the stage to make her claims. Mr. Adi said he felt harassed and threatened by Ms. Boddy and filed a civil protection order against her in September 2023.

And that's where things really started to get interesting. A judge granted the order, which barred Ms. Boddy from being within 500 feet of Mr. Adi or contacting him. The order also prevented Ms. Boddy from attending any school board meetings while Mr. Adi was present, effectively suspending her from her duties as a board member.

But did that stop Ms. Boddy from trying to attend meetings? Of course not! She filed an emergency motion to partially suspend the order so that she could attend the board meetings. A judge granted the motion on September 29, 2023, but imposed strict conditions on Ms. Boddy's behavior.

It's almost like Ms. Boddy is a character straight out of a sitcom. She's the wacky neighbor who always causes trouble but somehow manages to come out on top. But in reality, her behavior is no laughing matter. She's wasting taxpayer money on court appearances and causing unnecessary drama when she should be working to improve the district.

In the end, it's clear that electing a Karen to the school board is never a good idea. They may be entertaining at first, but their antics quickly become tiresome and detrimental to the community they serve. Let's hope that Lakota voters have learned their lesson and elect someone more competent next time around.

Court orders Lakota school board member Darbi Boddy to stay away from fellow board member https://www.fox19.com/2023/09/20/lakota-school-board-member-darbi-boddy-ordered-stay-away-fellow-board-member/ 

Judge overrules request to keep Lakota board member Darbi Boddy from today’s meeting https://www.journal-news.com/news/lakota-board-member-given-permission-to-attend-todays-meeting-despite-protection-order/2WE2TNLBUNER3ANNI57S7CQD6E/ 

School board member attends first meeting since protection order issued | WKRC https://local12.com/news/local/school-board-member-attends-first-meeting-since-protection-order-issued-lakota-liberty-township-darbi-boddy-crt-ela-classes-isaac-adi-harassment-file-pattern-cincinnati-ohio 

Darbi Boddy attends Lakota Schools meeting despite protective order https://www.wcpo.com/news/local-news/butler-county/darbi-boddy-attends-lakota-schools-meeting-despite-protective-order-from-fellow-board-member 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BING AI

Here is a summary of the controversy involving Lakota school board member Darbi Boddy:

• - Darbi Boddy is a conservative board member who was elected in 2021 along with Isaac Adi, another conservative candidate¹.
• - Boddy has been accused of spreading false and inflammatory claims about the district's curriculum, diversity initiatives, and LGBTQ+ issues¹²³.
• - In April 2022, Boddy posted a typo on Facebook that led to a pornographic website. She claimed that students were being exposed to inappropriate sexual materials at school, which the district and other board members denied⁴.
• - The board censured Boddy and asked her to resign, but she refused. She also faced backlash from parents and community members who called for her removal⁴.
• - In May 2022, Boddy attended a conference in Sarasota, Florida, hosted by The Leadership Institute, a conservative organization that trains conservatives on how to campaign, fundraise and organize¹.
• - At the conference, Boddy allegedly embarrassed Adi and the Lakota School District by making a scene in front of other attendees. She also accused Adi of voting against her on LGBTQ+ issues and grabbed the microphone from the stage to make her claims¹.
• - Adi said he felt harassed and threatened by Boddy and filed a civil protection order against her in September 2023. A judge granted the order, which barred Boddy from being within 500 feet of Adi or contacting him¹².
• - The order also prevented Boddy from attending any school board meetings while Adi was present, effectively suspending her from her duties as a board member².
• - Boddy filed an emergency motion to partially suspend the order so that she could attend the board meetings. A judge granted the motion on September 29, 2023, but imposed strict conditions on Boddy's behavior².
• - Boddy was also excluded from the new Lakota Community Diversity Council, which was created in June 2023 to replace the district's disbanded Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Committee³.
• - The previous committee had a heated meeting in May 2023, where Boddy accused the staff members of promoting terrorism for supporting the Black Lives Matter movement and trying to indoctrinate children with Critical Race Theory³.
• - The other board members voted 4-1 to approve the new council without Boddy's participation. They said they wanted to have more productive and respectful conversations about diversity and inclusion in the district³.

Bing, 10/3/2023

• (1) Lakota School Board excludes controversial member in new diversity .... https://www.wvxu.org/education/2023-06-05/lakota-school-board-diversity-council-darby-boddi.
• (2) Darbi Boddy allowed to attend school board meetings despite civil .... https://www.wvxu.org/education/2023-09-29/darbi-boddy-allowed-attend-school-board-meetings-civil-protection-order.
• (3) Lakota School Board's Darbi Boddy receives civil protection order - WVXU. https://www.wvxu.org/education/2023-09-21/darbi-boddy-lakota-school-board-civil-protection-order.
• (4) Lakota school board meets Monday after censuring member. https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2022/05/09/lakota-school-board-meets-monday-after-censuring-member/9702399002/.

IT YOU AREN'T OUTRAGED YOU ARE NOT PAYING ATTENTION: THE PROBLEM WITH NO ACCOUNTABILITY CHARTER SCHOOL BULLSHIT

IT YOU AREN'T OUTRAGED YOU ARE NOT PAYING ATTENTION

THE PROBLEM WITH NO ACCOUNTABILITY CHARTER SCHOOL BULLSHIT

Charter schools have been in the news a lot lately, and not for good reasons. They've been charged with fraud, embezzlement, mismanagement, and child abuse. And now, to add insult to injury, one of the co-founders of Breakthrough Charter Schools in Cleveland, Ohio has been arrested and charged with engaging in prostitution as part of a statewide human trafficking operation called "Operation Buyer's Remorse." I mean, come on! When will Congress act to stop the no accountability of charter schools instead of spending on scandal-riffic charter schools?

John Zitzner, the founder of Breakthrough Charter Schools, was among 160 people taken into custody from September 25-30. 149 suspects were charged with engaging in prostitution, two charged with seeking to have sex with minors, and six charged with promoting prostitution. Zitzner's case is being handled through the Rocky River Municipal Court. The Ohio Attorney General's Office said that Zitzner told task force members "he works in education at Friend of Breakthrough Schools." Board Chair Jeff Berlin confirmed that Zitzner worked for Friends of Breakthrough, a separate organization from the schools, and did not work at any of the Breakthrough Schools.

But let's not focus solely on Zitzner. Let's talk about the bigger issue at hand: the lack of accountability in charter schools. The U.S. Department of Education has requested and received $440 million from Congress for the CSP grant every fiscal year. That's a lot of money! And yet, 14 percent of charter schools that received CSP State awards closed or never opened between fiscal years 2006 and 2020. That's just 638 schools that received about $152 million (8 percent) of the approximately $2 billion provided in CSP State awards during that period. That's not so bad, right? Wrong!

Charter schools are supposed to be held accountable for their actions, but time and time again we see instances where they are not. The lack of oversight and regulation is alarming. It's like giving a teenager a credit card with no limit and no consequences for their spending habits. They're going to go wild! And that's exactly what we're seeing with charter schools.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that all charter schools are bad. There are some great ones out there that are doing amazing things for their students. But the bad apples are spoiling the bunch. And until we start holding these schools accountable for their actions, we're going to continue to see scandals like the one involving John Zitzner.

So what can be done? Well, for starters, Congress needs to start taking a closer look at how these schools are being run. They need to put more regulations in place to ensure that taxpayer dollars are being spent appropriately. They also need to hold these schools accountable for their actions. If a school is found to be engaging in fraudulent or illegal activities, they should be shut down immediately.

In addition, parents need to do their homework before sending their children to a charter school. They need to research the school's history and reputation. They need to talk to other parents and students who have attended the school. And they need to ask tough questions about how the school is being run and how their tax dollars are being spent.

In conclusion, the problem with no accountability charter school bullshit needs to be addressed. We can't continue to turn a blind eye to the scandals and illegal activities that are happening within these schools. It's time for Congress to step up and start holding these schools accountable for their actions. And it's time for parents to start doing their homework before sending their children to a charter school. Let's make sure that every child has access to a quality education, but let's do it in a way that is transparent, accountable, and responsible.

Charter school founder arrested in Ohio human trafficking sting | wkyc.com https://www.wkyc.com/article/news/local/human-trafficking/john-zitzner-cleveland-breakthrough-charter-schools-statewide-human-trafficking-operation/95-fbdcdfa0-b6b1-4db0-9539-ee4846be1871 

John Zitzner, Founder of Breakthrough Charter Schools, Arrested in Human Trafficking Sting AG Dave Yost announced the arrests of nearly 150 suspects in 'Operation Buyer's Remorse.' Zitzner was charged with engaging in prostitution https://www.clevescene.com/news/john-zitzner-founder-of-breakthrough-charter-schools-arrested-in-human-trafficking-sting-42860285 

Charter Scandals - Network For Public Education https://networkforpubliceducation.org/charter-scandals/ 

Big Education Ape: US DEPT. OF EDUCATION SENDS MISSOURI CHARTER SCHOOL CHAIN A 36 MILLION STARTUP MONEY BOMB http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2023/09/us-dept-of-education-sends-missouri.html 

THE BANALITY OF EVIL: TRUMP'S FOLLOWERS AND THE DANGERS OF BLIND OBEDIENCE

THE BANALITY OF EVIL: TRUMP'S FOLLOWERS AND THE DANGERS OF BLIND OBEDIENCE

As we reflect on the events of January 6th, it's easy to label Trump's followers as red-eyed monsters, blindly following their leader into a violent insurrection. But the truth is much more banal and disturbing. These were ordinary Americans, blinded by their own prejudices and empowered by Trump's violent rhetoric.

The concept of the banality of evil, coined by philosopher Hannah Arendt (*see below), helps us understand how ordinary people can commit extraordinary acts of evil. Arendt witnessed this firsthand during the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi official responsible for organizing the deportation of millions of Jews to concentration camps. Eichmann was not a sadistic monster, but rather a "bureaucrat" who was more concerned with following orders than with the consequences of his actions.

Similarly, many of Trump's followers were not inherently evil, but rather ordinary people who were swept up in his dangerous rhetoric. They were told to "take action" and "stop the steal," and they obeyed without question. The Milgram experiment(*see below) showed us that ordinary people are capable of committing great evil if they are ordered to do so by an authority figure. Trump became that authority figure for his followers.

But we must not excuse their actions. Blind obedience is dangerous and can lead to horrific consequences. We must be willing to think critically about our actions and challenge authority when necessary. We must also be vigilant in defending our individual conscience and moral values.

President Joe Biden has warned that Trump is a threat to American democracy, and he is right. Trump's false message that the election was stolen and his efforts to pressure Congress and Vice President Pence to overturn the result led to the violent insurrection at the Capitol. Legal experts are split on whether Trump could face criminal liability for his role in these events, but testimony from rioters who felt directed to take part in illegal acts by his speech could inform a decision by prosecutors about whether to attempt to build a case.

The banality of evil is a reminder that we are all capable of doing terrible things, especially when we are placed in difficult or dangerous situations. It is important to be aware of this and to take steps to prevent ourselves from becoming perpetrators of evil. We must challenge authority when necessary, and we must stand up for what is right, even when it is difficult.

As we move forward as a nation, we must remember the lessons of the banality of evil. We must resist blind obedience and challenge authority when necessary. We must defend our individual conscience and moral values. And we must never forget the dangers of following a leader who seeks to divide us and incite violence.

Biden warns Trump, 'MAGA' movement threaten American democracy | Reuters https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-warn-threat-democracy-trump-honor-mccain-2023-09-28/ 

The Trump world’s assault on the people who administer U.S. elections https://www.reuters.com/investigates/section/campaign-of-fear/ 

Trump Attacks on Prosecutors and Judges Raise Safety Concerns | TIME https://time.com/6303523/trump-prosecutors-violent-threats/ 

'No Blame?' ABC News finds 54 cases invoking 'Trump' in connection with violence, threats, alleged assaults. - ABC News https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/blame-abc-news-finds-17-cases-invoking-trump/story?id=58912889 

Trump targeted prosecutors in D.C. election case with threats, harassment, according to district judge | PBS NewsHour https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-targeted-prosecutors-in-d-c-election-case-with-threats-harassment-according-to-district-judge

Trump Wants His Enemies to Fear for Their Lives https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/09/trump-milley-death-fbi-threats.html 

Trump’s threats to Milley fuel fears he’ll seek vengeance in second term | The Hill https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4224405-trumps-threats-to-milley-fuel-fears-hell-seek-vengeance-in-second-term/ 

‘Trump said to do so’: Accounts of rioters who say the president spurred them to rush the Capitol could be pivotal testimony - The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-rioters-testimony/2021/01/16/01b3d5c6-575b-11eb-a931-5b162d0d033d_story.html 

Trump is explaining exactly how wild and extreme his second term would be | CNN Politics https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/11/politics/trump-wild-rhetoric-2024/index.html 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI 

The banality of evil is a term coined by the German-born American philosopher Hannah Arendt in her 1963 book *Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil*. Arendt used the term to describe the disturbing phenomenon of ordinary people committing extraordinary acts of evil.

Arendt's book is a report on the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a high-ranking Nazi official who was responsible for organizing the deportation of millions of Jews to concentration camps. Eichmann was captured in Argentina in 1960 and put on trial in Jerusalem in 1961. He was found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity and was executed in 1962.

Arendt attended the Eichmann trial and was struck by how ordinary Eichmann seemed. She described him as a "bureaucrat" who was more concerned with following orders and advancing his career than with the consequences of his actions. Eichmann was not a sadistic monster or a rabid anti-Semite, Arendt argued. Instead, he was a "banal person" who was capable of committing great evil because he was unable to think critically about his actions.

Arendt's concept of the banality of evil has been controversial, but it has also been influential. It has helped us to understand how ordinary people can become involved in atrocities, and it has challenged the idea that evil is always perpetrated by monsters.

The banality of evil is a reminder that we are all capable of evil, and that we must constantly be on guard against it. We must be willing to think critically about our actions and to challenge authority when necessary. We must also be willing to stand up for what is right, even when it is difficult.

Here are some examples of the banality of evil in the real world:

• * Nazi soldiers who carried out the Holocaust were not all sadistic monsters. Many of them were ordinary people who were simply following orders.
• * American soldiers who committed atrocities in the Vietnam War were often ordinary young men who had been drafted into the army and were trying to do their job.
• * Police officers who use excessive force against civilians are often not bad people. They are simply making bad decisions in the heat of the moment.

The banality of evil is a reminder that we are all capable of doing terrible things, especially when we are placed in difficult or dangerous situations. It is important to be aware of this and to take steps to prevent ourselves from becoming perpetrators of evil.

Here are some things we can do to prevent the banality of evil:

• * Think critically about our actions and the consequences of our choices.
• * Challenge authority when necessary.
• * Stand up for what is right, even when it is difficult.
• * Be aware of the dangers of groupthink and conformity.
• * Speak out against injustice and discrimination.
• * Promote education and critical thinking skills.

The banality of evil is a serious problem, but it is one that we can overcome if we are vigilant and committed to doing what is right.

*The Milgram experiment was a series of psychology experiments conducted by Stanley Milgram at Yale University in the early 1960s. The experiment examined the willingness of ordinary people to obey the orders of an authority figure, even when those orders contradicted their own moral sense.

In the experiment, participants were told that they were participating in a study of learning and memory. They were instructed to administer a series of electric shocks to a learner (who was actually an actor) each time the learner made a mistake. The shocks were fake, but the participants believed that they were real.

As the experiment progressed, the shocks became increasingly severe. The learner screamed in pain and begged to be stopped. However, the experimenter (who was actually Milgram himself) continued to order the participants to administer the shocks.

Despite the obvious distress of the learner, a surprisingly large number of participants continued to obey the experimenter's orders. In fact, two-thirds of the participants went all the way to the end of the experiment and administered the maximum shock.

The Milgram experiment has been widely criticized for its ethical implications. However, it remains one of the most important and influential psychology experiments ever conducted. It has helped us to understand the power of obedience and the dangers of groupthink.

The Milgram experiment has had a number of important implications. It has shown that ordinary people are capable of committing great evil if they are ordered to do so by an authority figure. It has also shown that we are all susceptible to the power of groupthink and the desire to conform to the expectations of others.

The Milgram experiment is a reminder that we must always be on guard against the dangers of obedience and conformity. We must also be willing to think critically about our actions and to challenge authority when necessary.

Here are some of the lessons we can learn from the Milgram experiment:

• * Ordinary people are capable of committing great evil if they are ordered to do so by an authority figure.
• * We are all susceptible to the power of groupthink and the desire to conform to the expectations of others.
• * We must be willing to think critically about our actions and to challenge authority when necessary.
• * We must be vigilant in defending our individual conscience and our moral values.

The Milgram experiment is a powerful and disturbing reminder of the human capacity for evil. However, it is also a reminder that we have the power to resist evil and to choose the right thing to do, even when it is difficult.

PHILLY CHARTER SCHOOLS: THE BEYONCE OF EDUCATION OR JUST ANOTHER ONE HIT WONDER

PHILLY CHARTER SCHOOLS: THE BEYONCE OF EDUCATION OR JUST ANOTHER ONE HIT WONDER

Ah, Philadelphia charter schools. The topic that's more controversial than a cheesesteak with ketchup. But fear not, dear readers, for I have embarked on a quest to uncover the truth about these elusive institutions. And let me tell you, it's been a wild ride.

First off, let's talk about how charter schools work. They receive government funding but are managed privately by nonprofits. It's like if the government gave you money to start a lemonade stand, but then you got to make up your own lemonade recipe and charge whatever you wanted for it. Sounds pretty sweet, right?

But not everyone is a fan of this setup. Some argue that charter schools take away funding from public schools, leaving them with less resources to educate the students who need it the most. Others say that charter schools cherry-pick the best students, leaving public schools with a disproportionate number of students who require more resources and support.

So what's the deal with Philly charter schools specifically? Well, according to a series of reports by The Logan Center for Urban Investigative Reporting and Chalkbeat Philadelphia, there's a lot of work to be done. The reports found that charter schools in Philly are more racially segregated than public schools, and that students with disabilities are less likely to attend charter schools than their peers in public schools.

But wait, there's more! The reports also found that some charter schools in Philly have been caught inflating their enrollment numbers to receive more funding. It's like when your little brother tries to sneak an extra cookie from the jar, except instead of cookies it's taxpayer dollars.

But before we completely write off charter schools, let's acknowledge that they do have some benefits. Charter schools can design their own curriculums and electives, which can be tailored to the needs and interests of their students. And some charter schools have shown impressive academic results, particularly in low-income communities.

So what's the verdict? Are Philly charter schools good or bad? The answer is...complicated. There are certainly issues that need to be addressed, but it's not all doom and gloom. As with most things in life, the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

Now, let's talk about something even more exciting than charter schools: the Philadelphia Renaissance Schools. These are public schools that have undergone a transformation to improve academic performance and student outcomes. It's like when Cinderella goes from rags to riches, except instead of a fairy godmother it's a team of educators and administrators.

But here's where things get really interesting: Cherelle Parker, the Democratic nominee for Philadelphia mayor, has some strong opinions on charter schools. She's been vocal about her support for Philadelphia Renaissance Schools, but has also expressed concerns about the impact of charter schools on public education.

So what does all of this mean for the future of education in Philly? It means that there's a lot of work to be done, and a lot of tough decisions to be made. But if we can come together and focus on what's best for our students, we can create a brighter future for everyone.

In conclusion, Philly charter schools are like a cheesesteak with onions: some people love them, some people hate them, and everyone has an opinion. But no matter where you stand on the issue, let's all agree on one thing: ketchup has no place on a cheesesteak.

How Philadelphia charter schools work, and why they’re controversial https://billypenn.com/2023/10/02/philadelphia-charter-schools-explainer-10-questions/ 

IDEA CLASH AT COLLEGE: ACADEMIC FREEDOM OF SPEECH VS. STFU MENTALITY

IDEA CLASH AT COLLEGE: ACADEMIC FREEDOM OF SPEECH VS. STFU MENTALITY

Are college campuses friendlier to liberals than conservatives when it comes to free speech? According to a new poll conducted by the University of Chicago and The Associated Press-NORC Centre for Public Affairs Research, the answer is a resounding "yes." But why is that the case? And how can we ensure that all voices are heard on campus?

First, let's address the elephant in the room: political correctness. It seems that in our quest to be inclusive and tolerant, we have become intolerant of anyone who doesn't share our views. We've created safe spaces where students can retreat from ideas that challenge their worldview, and we've labeled dissenting opinions as hate speech. But what if we're wrong? What if our beliefs are misguided or incomplete? Shouldn't we welcome opposing viewpoints as a way to broaden our understanding of the world?

Of course, that's easier said than done. It's hard to listen to someone who disagrees with us, especially if they're loud and obnoxious about it. But that's where academic freedom of speech comes in. It's the idea that professors and students should be free to express their ideas without fear of censorship or retaliation. It's the foundation of higher education, the reason why we have universities in the first place. Without academic freedom of speech, we'd be stuck in an echo chamber, hearing only what we want to hear.

But here's the thing: academic freedom of speech isn't just for liberals. It's for conservatives, too. And libertarians. And socialists. And anarchists. And anyone else who wants to join the conversation. We can't pick and choose which voices we want to hear. We have to hear them all, even if we don't like what they're saying.

So, what can we do to ensure that all voices are heard on campus? First, we need to stop demonizing people who disagree with us. Just because someone has a different opinion doesn't mean they're evil or stupid or racist or whatever label we want to slap on them. We need to engage with them in a civil and respectful manner, even if we think they're wrong.

Second, we need to encourage diversity of thought. This means hiring professors with different perspectives and backgrounds, and exposing students to a variety of ideas and viewpoints. It means creating an environment where students feel comfortable expressing their opinions, even if they're unpopular.

And third, we need to defend academic freedom of speech at all costs. This means pushing back against attempts to censor or silence dissenting voices, whether it's through administrative policies or student protests. It means standing up for professors who are being targeted for their views, even if we don't agree with them.

In conclusion, academic freedom of speech is essential for a healthy and vibrant university community. It's not just a liberal or conservative issue; it's a human issue. We need to hear all voices, even if they don't fit our own point of view. So let's embrace academic freedom of speech, and if you don't like it... well, you know what to do. STFU.

Few Americans say conservatives can speak freely on college campuses, an AP-NORC/UChicago poll shows | AP News https://apnews.com/article/free-speech-college-campuses-0b2811fb35c9c6288b7517da7c9affd3 

Public perceptions of freedom of expression on university campuses paints a complex picture - AP-NORC https://apnorc.org/projects/public-perceptions-of-freedom-of-expression-on-university-campuses-paints-a-complex-picture/ 

THE VIRGINITY COMPLEX: HOW ABSTINENCE ONLY SEX EDUCATION FAILS KIDS

 

THE VIRGINITY COMPLEX: HOW ABSTINENCE ONLY SEX EDUCATION FAILS KIDS

Okay folks, buckle up because we're about to talk about everyone's favorite subject: sex education! Specifically, we're going to dive into the wacky world of Texas public schools and their partnership with crisis pregnancy centers to teach sex ed. Yes, you read that correctly. The same centers that try to talk women out of getting abortions are now trying to teach our kids about the birds and the bees. What could possibly go wrong?

First of all, let's talk about the elephant in the room: abstinence-only education. Look, I get it. Waiting until marriage to have sex is a noble goal. But let's be real, it's about as effective as a leaky rubber. Kids are going to have sex, and pretending otherwise is like sticking your head in the sand. Plus, abstinence-only education is about as funny as a root canal. It's like telling a kid they can't have candy and then never explaining why. Of course they're going to sneak it when you're not looking!

But seriously, folks. The power of human sexuality is greater than any MAGA Christian rules saying save it for marriage and other claptrap being spouted in Texas sex ed classes run by MAGA Christians. We need comprehensive sex education that covers everything from contraception to consent. And no, teaching kids about condoms isn't going to make them go out and have sex. It's like saying teaching kids about seat belts is going to make them go out and crash their cars.

Now, let's talk about these crisis pregnancy centers infiltrating our schools. They claim their approach is effective, but public health experts say otherwise. Their curricula can be misleading and biased, and they often use fear-based tactics to promote abstinence-only education. I mean, come on. Scaring kids into not having sex is like trying to scare a cat into not chasing a laser pointer. It's not going to work.

And let's not forget the elephant in the room: these centers are pushing an anti-abortion agenda. They're using their influence to sway young minds and promote their own beliefs. It's like letting McDonald's teach nutrition classes. Sure, they might talk about the importance of fruits and veggies, but at the end of the day, they're still going to try to sell you a Big Mac.

Look, I'm not saying we should ban crisis pregnancy centers from our schools. But we need to be aware of their agenda and the potential harm they can cause. We need to demand comprehensive sex education that gives our kids the tools they need to make informed decisions about their bodies and their health. And we need to do it with a sense of humor, because let's face it, sex is funny. It's messy and awkward and hilarious. So let's embrace that and teach our kids in a way that's both informative and entertaining.

In conclusion, folks, we need to take sex education seriously. We can't rely on leaky rubbers or fear-based tactics to keep our kids safe and healthy. We need comprehensive sex education that covers everything from contraception to consent, and we need it taught by qualified professionals who aren't pushing their own agendas. And most importantly, we need to remember that sex is funny. So let's laugh a little while we learn a lot.

How anti-abortion centers teach sex ed inside Texas public schools | The Texas Tribune https://www.texastribune.org/2023/10/02/crisis-pregnancy-centers-texas-sex-ed/ 

Which sex ed approach works best for STI and pregnancy prevention? Research remains unclear | KQED https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/62450/which-sex-ed-approach-works-best-for-sti-and-pregnancy-prevention-research-remains-unclear 

PROOF POINTS: The research evidence for sex ed remains thin https://hechingerreport.org/proof-points-the-research-evidence-for-sex-ed-remains-thin/ 

Comprehensive Sexuality Education to Reduce Pregnancy and STIs in Adolescents in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: American Journal of Sexuality Education: Vol 18, No 1 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15546128.2022.2080140 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI

Abstinence-only sex education (AOE) is a form of sex education that teaches that abstinence from sexual activity is the only way to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). AOE programs typically do not provide information about contraception or safe sex practices.

AOE programs have been widely criticized for being ineffective and harmful. Research has shown that AOE programs do not delay sexual activity or reduce rates of pregnancy and STIs. In fact, some studies have shown that AOE programs may actually increase the risk of these outcomes.

AOE programs have also been criticized for promoting negative attitudes towards sex and sexuality. These programs often teach that sex is shameful and wrong outside of marriage. They may also promote harmful gender stereotypes and reinforce traditional sexual norms.

Despite the evidence against AOE, these programs continue to be funded by governments and religious organizations around the world. In the United States, the federal government has spent billions of dollars on AOE programs since the 1980s.

Here are some of the key problems with abstinence-only sex education:

• * **It is not effective in preventing pregnancy and STIs.** Research has shown that AOE programs do not delay sexual activity or reduce rates of pregnancy and STIs. In fact, some studies have shown that AOE programs may actually increase the risk of these outcomes.
• * **It is harmful to young people.** AOE programs can promote negative attitudes towards sex and sexuality, and can reinforce harmful gender stereotypes. They can also leave young people unprepared to deal with the realities of sex and sexuality, such as unwanted sexual advances and pressure to have sex.
• * **It is not comprehensive.** AOE programs do not provide young people with the information they need to make informed decisions about their sexuality and sexual health. They do not teach about contraception or safe sex practices, which can leave young people at risk of pregnancy and STIs.

Comprehensive sex education, on the other hand, is a form of sex education that teaches about both abstinence and contraception. Comprehensive sex education programs provide young people with the information they need to make informed decisions about their sexuality and sexual health. They teach about contraception, safe sex practices, and healthy relationships.

Research has shown that comprehensive sex education is effective in preventing pregnancy and STIs. It also helps young people develop positive attitudes towards sex and sexuality, and can reduce the risk of sexual violence.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and other leading public health organizations recommend comprehensive sex education for all young people.

Here are some of the benefits of comprehensive sex education:

• * **It delays sexual activity.** Studies have shown that comprehensive sex education can delay the onset of sexual activity.
• * **It reduces rates of pregnancy and STIs.** Studies have shown that comprehensive sex education can reduce rates of pregnancy and STIs among young people.
• * **It improves sexual health outcomes.** Comprehensive sex education can help young people develop positive attitudes towards sex and sexuality, and can reduce the risk of sexual violence.
• * **It is effective for all young people.** Comprehensive sex education programs can be tailored to meet the needs of all young people, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Conclusion

Abstinence-only sex education is an ineffective and harmful approach to sex education. Comprehensive sex education is the best way to help young people make informed decisions about their sexuality and sexual health.

FROM BING AI

Abstinence-only sex education is a form of sex education that teaches not having sex outside of marriage. It often excludes other types of sexual and reproductive health education, such as birth control and safe sex. ²

Some people may support abstinence-only sex education because they believe it is the only morally correct option for teenagers, and that it can prevent unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). However, there is no evidence that abstinence-only sex education is effective at achieving these goals. In fact, studies have shown that abstinence-only sex education is ineffective, misleading, and even harmful to young people. ¹²⁸

Some of the drawbacks of abstinence-only sex education are:

• - It denies young people necessary and even life-saving information about their own bodies, reproductive health, and sexuality. [^10^]
• - It uses fear tactics to promote abstinence and to limit sexual expression. ¹³
• - It discusses condoms and contraception only in terms of failure rates, and often exaggerates these rates. ¹³
• - It provides no information on forms of contraception other than condoms, leaving young people unprepared for preventing pregnancy if they do become sexually active. [^10^]
• - It omits controversial topics such as abortion, masturbation, and sexual orientation, or presents them in a negative or biased way. ²¹³
• - It teaches only one set of values as morally correct for all students, regardless of their personal beliefs, cultural backgrounds, or sexual identities. ¹³
• - It does not address the issues of consent, sexual violence, healthy relationships, or gender equality. [^10^]

Some alternatives to abstinence-only sex education are comprehensive sex education and abstinence-plus education. Comprehensive sex education teaches about abstinence as the best method for avoiding STIs and unintended pregnancy, but also teaches about condoms and contraception to reduce the risk of these outcomes. It also teaches interpersonal and communication skills and helps young people explore their own values, goals, and options. Abstinence-plus education is similar to comprehensive sex education, but it stresses abstinence as the best way to prevent pregnancy and STIs, while also providing information on contraception and condoms. ¹¹³

Both comprehensive sex education and abstinence-plus education have been proven to be more effective than abstinence-only sex education in delaying sexual activity, reducing sexual risk behaviors, increasing condom and contraceptive use, and preventing STIs and pregnancies among young people. They also provide positive messages about sexuality and sexual expression, including the benefits of abstinence. They respect the diversity of students' backgrounds and experiences, and empower them to make informed decisions about their sexual health and well-being. ¹⁴⁷

Source: Conversation with Bing, 10/2/2023

• (1) Abstinence-only sex education - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstinence-only_sex_education.
• (2) Abstinence Education Programs: Definition, Funding, and Impact on ... - KFF. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/fact-sheet/abstinence-education-programs-definition-funding-and-impact-on-teen-sexual-behavior/.
• (3) Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Programs Are Ineffective and Harmful to .... https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2017/abstinence-only-until-marriage-programs-are-ineffective-and-harmful-young-people.
• (4) Federally Funded Abstinence-Only Programs: Harmful and Ineffective .... https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/abstinence-only-programs.
• (5) Sex Education Programs: Definitions & Point-by-Point Comparison. https://www.advocatesforyouth.org/resources/fact-sheets/sex-education-programs-definitions-and-point-by-point-comparison/.
• (6) Evidence on the Effectiveness of Abstinence Education: An Update. https://www.heritage.org/education/report/evidence-the-effectiveness-abstinence-education-update.
• (7) Pros and Cons of Sex Education in School Children: Review - IDOSR. https://idosr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/IDOSR-JAS-51-42-45-2020.-UN.pdf.
• (8) Abstinence-Only Sex Education: Arguments For And Against. https://edubirdie.com/examples/abstinence-only-sex-education-arguments-for-and-against/.
• (9) The Pros And Cons Of Abstinence-Only Education In Texas. https://www.gogreenva.org/the-pros-and-cons-of-abstinence-only-education-in-texas/.
• (10) Abstinence Education: Weighing Pros and Cons | Education. https://www.education.com/download-pdf/article/98043/.
• (11) The Effectiveness of Abstinence Education Programs in Reducing Sexual .... https://www.heritage.org/education/report/the-effectiveness-abstinence-education-programs-reducing-sexual-activity-among.
• (12) Sex Education Standards Across the States - Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/sex-education-standards-across-states/.
• (13) Abstinence Only Education is a Failure | Columbia Public Health. https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/news/abstinence-only-education-failure.
• (14) Abstinence-Only Education States [Updated August 2023]. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/abstinence-only-education-states.