Latest News and Comment from Education

Thursday, March 30, 2017

Thinkers Thursday on Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all

Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all:

Thinkers Thursday on Diane Ravitch's blog
A site to discuss better education for all




I am writing this post for the journalists who cover education. Please fact-check every word that DeVos says. She literally doesn’t know what she is talking about. This is the New York Times’ report on Betsy DeVos ‘ press conference at 

In 2013, long before Trump decided to run for president, he signed a lease with the federal government to renovate a beautiful and historic building called the Old Post Office near the White House and convert it to a luxury hotel. The lease 

Slate: For-Profit Alternative Schools Accused of Abusive Treatment
If you ran a for-profit corporation that provides facilities for kids with disciplinary and academic issues, what would you call your chain of alternative high schools? Utopia High? No. Great Scholars High? No. How about Camelot? Bingo! A magical place of hope and possibility. In an age of alternative facts, open deceit, and fake news, why not? This investigative article was conducted by the Teac
CBS Tracks Gulen Charter Schools
CBS News ran a story about the mysterious Gulen charter chain and the reclusive cleric behind it. Former Turkish teachers at the large chain claimed they were required to kick back as much as 40% of their salary. The story is complicated, and few people outside the education world ever heard about it. Turkey has accused the Gulen movement of fomenting a coup. Since the failed coup, the Turkish go
Note to DeVos: A School is not a Taxi or an Uber
At the Brookings celebration of school choice, Secretary DeVos said that people should choose a school like choosing Uber or some other alternative to the traditional public school. She is clueless about the role of public education in a community and in a democracy. Picking your mode transportation is a consumer good that you pay for; public education is both a public good and a right. https://w
Mercedes Schneider: A Real Public School is not a Franchise
Mercedes Schneider had the stomach to watch Betsy DeVos and Grover Whitehurst talk about their favorite subject –School Choice–at Brookings today. She noticed their careless use of business language to talk about schools, at one point referring to them as “franchises.” https://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2017/03/29/are-traditional-public-schools-franchises/ As I said, Mercedes has a strong stomach, a
Betsy DeVos Suck-Up Watch
The website Chalkbeat posted an article about the sunny side of Secretary DeVos. http://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/us/2017/03/28/rave-reviews-here-are-the-states-schools-and-programs-that-have-gotten-betsy-devoss-seal-of-approval/ She likes really good programs! Like Florida’s tax credit programs for vouchers! (Which sucks tax dollars away from public schools) Like Milwaukee’s school choice programs

YESTERDAY

Trump and Russia: The Plot Thickens
A friend sent me this article but I decided not to post it because I didn’t know how to fact-check its sensational allegations. http://whowhatwhy.org/2017/03/27/fbi-cant-tell-trump-russia/ It contains some serious allegations about relations between Trump and the Russian mob. This is way outside my field of expertise but I was nonetheless shocked by the implications. Then today USA Today ran a fr
Network for Public Education Action Fund Endorses Steve Zimmer for Re-Election to LAUSD Board
The billionaires are circling the Los Angeles public schools again, trying to gain control of the school board so they can shift half the students into privately managed charter schools that are free to pick the students they want and kick out the ones they don’t want. They have targeted Steve Zimmer, the current president of the Los Angeles Unified School District, as a barrier to their insidiou
A Call for the American Psychological Association and Other Professionals: Speak Up!
Many readers are asking the same question: Why isn’t the American Psychological Association speaking out about the misuse of standardized testing? Where are the professors who teach about testing? Why are they silent when children as young as 8 are subjected to hours of testing? Why are they silent when children in middle school are compelled to sit through tests that last longer than college adm
Brookings Sullies Its Reputation By Aligning with DeVos Agenda for Privatization
The Brookings Institution used to be referred to as a liberal think tank. In reality, it was a nonpartisan think tank that hired former high-level officials from both Democratic and Republican administrations and produced valuable studies and reports. As I was ending my time in the first Bush administration in late 1992, the president of Brookings came to my office at the US Department of Educati
Peter Greene: What Two Decades of Testing Have Produced
http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2017/03/the-lost-years.html?m=1 Peter Greene asks a crucial questio n: What have we gained–or lost–because of our society’s obsession with standardized testing for at least the last two decades? When did it start? Before No Child Left Behind was signed into law in January 2002, but not with the same intensity or the high-stakes that took hold since 2002, when th
Leonie Haimson Is Collecting Comments on the New York ELA
The state Common Core tests that children in grades 3-8 in New York are supposed to take are shrouded in secrecy. Last year, a teacher posted a couple of items to show how confusing and tricky they were, and the testing company went on a tear, threatening legal action against the teacher and against the blogger who posted the questions. They went to Twitter and had tweets referring to the post de
An 8-Year-Old Child Writes Betsy DeVos: “I Love My Public School”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/8-year-old-sends-heartfelt-message-about-her-public-school-to-betsy-devos_us_58d3ed5ce4b0b22b0d1a9076 A second-grade student wrote to Betsy DeVos to tell her that she loves her public school. She pleaded with DeVos, “Please leave are [sic] public schools alone do not tear it down ever.” Willa is a second grader. She is the daughter of a journalist, who posted W
Ralph Ratto: Today I Am Ashamed to Be a Teacher
Ralph Ratto is an elementary school teacher in New York and a frequent blogger. He describes yesterday as “one of the darkest days in education. ” Testing started yesterday. Now that the tests are untied, some children will struggle for six hours a day for six days to satisfy some adult idea that they need to be compared. Their ordeal has nothing to do with education. “Our children will struggle


Good News: Charter School Growth Is Slowing
Citing an article in Education Week, The National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education at Teachers College notes that charter school growth is slowing. “Charter school growth is slowing down, reported Education Week. 

Diane Ravitch's blog | A site to discuss better education for all:

What N.Y. parents should know about 2017 Common Core standardized tests - The Washington Post

What N.Y. parents should know about 2017 Common Core standardized tests - The Washington Post:

What N.Y. parents should know about 2017 Common Core standardized tests


Spring standardized testing has begun. Millions of students around the country will take standardized tests, with many of the exams carrying high-stakes consequences for students, educators and/or schools. And hundreds of thousands of students are expected to opt out of the exams as a protest against the importance of standardized testing in schools today, and the use of test scores to evaluate students, teachers and schools.
The center of the opt-out movement has been in New York State, where 1.2 million students are taking Common Core standardized tests. For the past few years, more than 20 percent of students in New York state have refused to take the tests, which ostensibly assess how well students have learned in public schools with curriculum designed to meet the Common Core State Standards. State education officials have tried this year to blunt the opt-out movement (see more below), but supporters are encouraging students not to take the exams, and the state’s teachers union are sending the message on billboards and other platforms.
The start of testing in New York included a mistake in which, as Newsday reported, 64 third-graders were given computer-based English Language Arts testing meant for fourth graders. Meanwhile, a blog set up by some New York parents and public school activists already has some posts from teachers and others about the start of testing. For example, one post says in part:
Anonymous said…
Four passages that are well above grade level with 6 multiple choice questions most of which require that a student go back into the text and the answer is still difficult to figure out is ridiculous. Kids were twitching. Two of mine cried. I administered to 7 children with reading disabilities. They didn’t stand a chance. It makes me angry. I spent all year inspiring them to feel excited about learning and confident and in 10 minutes NYS made them feel like idiots….
In the following post, Fred Smith, a testing specialist and consultant, explains how the state is attempting to persuade parents not to opt-out, and what students face when they sit down to take the exams. Smith is retired as a senior analyst for the New York City public schools and a member of Change the Stakes, a parent advocacy group.

By Fred Smith
Last year, the parents and guardians of 220,000 children in New York State opted out of the English Language Arts (ELA) and math exams.  They are given to 1.2 million children annually in Grades 3 through 8, as required by federal law.  Their administration becomes the center of What N.Y. parents should know about 2017 Common Core standardized tests - The Washington Post:

School Vouchers' Dismal Record of Failure Comes Into Focus

School Vouchers' Dismal Record of Failure Comes Into Focus:

School Vouchers’ Dismal Record of Failure Comes Into Focus

Any lingering questions over how aggressively the Trump administration was going to pursue school privatization were answered on March 16 with the release of its FY2018-19 budget proposal. If approved by Congress, federal education programs will be slashed across the board, all to pay for an initial down payment of $1.4 billion this fiscal year on a national expansion of private school voucher programs. The eventual price tag for the program will be $20 billion annually.
It doesn’t matter how their proponents try to disguise them – education savings accounts, tuition tax credits, opportunity scholarships – vouchers are destructive and misguided schemes that use taxpayer dollars to “experiment with our children’s education without any evidence of real, lasting positive results,” says NEA President Lily Eskelsen García,
That was also the consensus of a panel of experts who convened recently at the Center for American Progress (CAP), a progressive think tank based in Washington D.C, to explore the implications of the Trump-DeVos privatization agenda. The discussion focused on three ways school vouchers pose a danger to the nation’s most vulnerable students, which were identified by Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) in a memo to her Senate colleagues and summarized in her keynote remarks.

Vouchers Help Private Schools Skirt Accountability and Transparency

Strong accountability measures help prevent students from falling through the cracks.  “We fly blind without the information we need to make sure our students are succeeding,” said Murray. “We strive to make accountability as effective as possible. ‘Unfortunately that system breaks down completely when it comes to public money going to private schools.”
Unlike public schools, private schools have almost complete autonomy with regard to how they operate: who they teach, what they teach, how they teach, how — if at all — they measure student achievement, how they manage their finances, and what they are required to disclose to parents and the public.



Obama administration Education secretary endorses Gonez, Melvoin for L.A. school board - LA Times

Obama administration Education secretary endorses Gonez, Melvoin for L.A. school board - LA Times:

Obama administration Education secretary endorses Gonez, Melvoin for L.A. school board


Arne Duncan, who was secretary of Education under President Obama, has endorsed Kelly Gonez and Nick Melvoin for the Los Angeles Board of Education, giving the candidates a counterpunch against opponents attempting to link them ideologically with the Trump administration.
Like President Trump and his Education secretary, Betsy DeVos, Melvoin and Gonez strongly support privately operated, publicly funded charter schools. But so does Duncan. And so did the administration of President Obama, who also maintained close ties with leaders of teachers unions critical of charters.

The union message to liberal Los Angeles voters has been that Melvoin and Gonez will pursue the Trump education agenda. But the candidates insist the more apt association is with Obama.
Duncan praised the background of Gonez, a charter school science teacher who worked for about two years during Obama’s presidency in the U.S. Department of Education.
“As the only Democrat in the race with professional education experience — from the classroom to President Obama’s administration — Kelly Gonez is by far the best candidate in the race to fight for California kids,” Duncan said in a statement released by a campaign firm working with both candidates.
In praising Melvoin, Duncan referred to the two years the candidate for District 4 spent teaching at an L.A. Unified School District middle school before attending law school and working for charter-friendly education reform groups.
Based on his experience as a teacher, Melvoin testified in two lawsuits: Reed vs. California sought to eliminate the last in, first out seniority system for teacher layoffs; Vergara vs. California attempted to weaken a range of teacher job protections.
Vergara was unsuccessful. In the short term, the Reed outcome prevented mass layoffs at schools staffed mostly by early career teachers. It’s had a modest longer-term impact.


“Nick Melvoin has shown his commitment to education as a teacher in Watts and a true Obama administration Education secretary endorses Gonez, Melvoin for L.A. school board - LA Times:

Carol Burris: What the public isn’t told about high-performing charter schools in Arizona - The Washington Post

What the public isn’t told about high-performing charter schools in Arizona - The Washington Post:

What the public isn’t told about high-performing charter schools in Arizona


President Trump’s first federal budget proposal seeks a $168 million increase for charter schools, which is a 50 percent funding increase from the current level set by the previous Obama administration. For Trump and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, charters are one tool in the school choice tool box that they say will be front and center of their education reform agenda.
Charter schools — which are publicly funded but privately operated, sometimes by for-profit companies — have been proliferating for some 25 years and today there are thousands in the United States. While the few million students they enroll are a fraction of the number of young people who attend K-12 schools in this country, the charter movement has been a key part of the school choice movement and the education reform debate.
Supporters of charter schools say they give parents an alternative to failing traditional public schools. Critics say they take vital resources away from traditional public schools and that many charters are poorly run.
While some charter schools are well-run and high-performing, others aren’t, and some states that allow charters have little or no oversight. A 2016 audit by the Education Department’s Inspector General’s Office found that the department — which awards multi-million-dollar grants to states for the creation and expansion of charters — had failed to provide adequate oversight of some of its relationships with charter management organizations.
This post details issues with charter schools in Arizona. It was written by Carol Burris, a former New York high school principal who is executive director of the nonprofit Network for Public Education. She has been chronicling problems with corporate school reform for years on this blog, and this post is part of her occasional series about troubled charter schools in California and other states.
Burris was named the 2010 Educator of the Year by the School Administrators Association of New York State, and in 2013, the same organization named her the New York State High School Principal of the Year. She was helped with this piece by Jim Hall, an elementary and middle school principal in Arizona for 23 years who, in 2014, founded Arizonans for Charter School What the public isn’t told about high-performing charter schools in Arizona - The Washington Post:


Join us tomorrow, Friday, for Hitting Left with the Klonsky brothers. | Fred Klonsky

Join us tomorrow, Friday, for Hitting Left with the Klonsky brothers. | Fred Klonsky:

Join us tomorrow, Friday, for Hitting Left with the Klonsky brothers.

Image result for Klonsky brothers

Tomorrow, Friday, March 31 Hitting Left with the Klonsky Brothers returns to the air on WLPN 105.5 FM in Chicago with live streaming at http://www.lumpenradio.com
Screen Shot 2017-03-30 at 6.36.33 AM
hrtln_5291_magnum
We will be missing our usual producer, Logan Bey, but we look forward to his return. Jamie Tucker will be at the producing board.
Joining us as guests in studio will be students from the Logan Square Neighborhood Association who have been active in anti-gentrification work, exploring their own cultural heritage and legacy and traveled earlier this year to Standing Rock.
Our other guests are old-time friends, activists and pioneers in the kind of social justice radio we are now doing. Hosts of the weekly Live from the Heartland, Katy Hogan and Mike James will be joining us in conversation about all things.
Live from the Heartland is on every Saturday morning at 9AM at WLUW, 88.7FM and live streaming.
Remember that our show can be heard on MixCloud about two hours after the broadcast. It is released as a podcast to be downloaded at Liberated Syndication where you can find all our programs starting with program #4. And on iTunes.Join us tomorrow, Friday, for Hitting Left with the Klonsky brothers. | Fred Klonsky:
HITTING LEFT #3

Are Charter CEOs Being Purely Altruistic in Their Demand for More Federal Support for Public Schools? | janresseger

Are Charter CEOs Being Purely Altruistic in Their Demand for More Federal Support for Public Schools? | janresseger:

Are Charter CEOs Being Purely Altruistic in Their Demand for More Federal Support for Public Schools?



What’s happening here?  The leaders of 20 of the nation’s charter school networks, including Achievement First, Aspire, Breakthrough, Green Dot, KIPP, Rocketship Education, Uncommon Schools and YES Prep published a letter in USA Today demanding that the Trump administration must change its budget priorities to be more supportive of traditional public schools.  Trump’s proposed budget expands by 50 percent the funding for the federal Charter Schools Program to stimulate the startup of new charter schools.  So why are these charter school providers complaining and why are they demanding more money for traditional public schools?
Here is some of what they said in their letter: “(W)e see ourselves as partners, not competitors, with traditional school districts… But to make that broader vision work, we need federal support for all schools, for all kids, not just kids in ‘choice’ schools… We realize that expressing concerns about a budget that benefits our schools might seem counterintuitive.  But we want to join with all those who are fighting to defend public education as an essential pillar of our democracy.”
What’s behind this attack of altruism?  What has caused the CEOs of some of the biggest and best known charter school networks to become advocates for federal funding for the very public schools we’ve been taught by Milton Friedman and Betsy DeVos to believe charters need to improve by competing with them in an education marketplace?
Well, for one thing, even though they rarely admit it, charter schools depend on their host public school systems to survive. Their mission is to provide escapes for some children from what they call “failing” public schools, but they count on their host school district to provide the special education services and English language instruction for the children they don’t serve. Charter schools don’t have to serve all children; they can “counsel out” the students who are not comfortable in their school culture—students whose behavior they struggle to manage—students who are too often truant—students whose low test scores are undermining their school’s ratings. The public school district provides the escape valve for the children the Are Charter CEOs Being Purely Altruistic in Their Demand for More Federal Support for Public Schools? | janresseger:


Illinois Moves To Dismiss Chicago Board of Education's Funding Lawsuit Under State Civil Rights Law - Education Law Prof Blog

Education Law Prof Blog:

Illinois Moves To Dismiss Chicago Board of Education's Funding Lawsuit Under State Civil Rights Law


The State of Illinois responded last week to the Chicago Board of Education's funding lawsuit, asking the state court to dismiss the Board's claims that the state's education budget maintains a "separate and unequal" system for funding school districts and pension obligations. In its dismissal motion, the State argued that the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) will not suffer irreparable injury from its budget shortfall after Gov. Bruce Rauner vetoed a bill that would have sent $215 million to CPS to cover its pension obligations that will come due this summer. The Governor reportedly rejected the bill because it did not include pension reforms that the Governor wanted. The State further argued in its dismissal motion that the state's civil rights law creates no grounds either to force the governor to sign a funding bill or to provide money that is not previously established by law. The lawsuit was filed by the Board in February on behalf of five African-American and Hispanic families (whose children attended CPS schools), alleging that the Illinois's failure to allocate money equitably to meet CPS's budget violated the state civil rights of minority children in its district (about 90% of CPS' students are minority).The state’s civil rights law provides that “if the burdens of a state policy fall disproportionately on members of particular racial groups, the state must advance a weighty justification.” As grounds, the Board alleged that the legislature allocated about 15% of the state education budget to Chicago, but the city enrolled nearly 20% of Illinois' schoolchildren in 2016. The Board's suit also challenged the state has created an unequal teacher pension system that requires Chicago to spend much Education Law Prof Blog:





How the SAT and PSAT collect personal data on students — and what the College Board does with it - The Washington Post

How the SAT and PSAT collect personal data on students — and what the College Board does with it - The Washington Post:

How the SAT and PSAT collect personal data on students — and what the College Board does with it


If your child takes the SAT or PSAT, is his or her personal information being collected, profiled, licensed and sold?
That is the question that Cheri Kiesecker, Colorado parent and member of the Parent Coalition for Student Privacy, asks and attempts to answer in the following important post. The Parent Coalition for Student Privacy is a national alliance of parents and advocates defending the rights of parents and students to protect their data.
The SAT has traditionally been used as a college entrance exam but it, and the ACT, also a college entrance exam, are increasingly being used as high school tests. In fact, 25 states now require that high school students take them for school accountability purposes, Education Week reported here.
The protection of personal data is in the news with the recent passage by Congress of legislation that eliminates landmark online privacy protections established by the Obama administration. It removes limits that had been placed on Internet service providers —  such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon — on how they can use data they collect on their customers, including browsing habits and Social Security numbers. Privacy advocates are especially concerned with how this will affect young people.
Here’s the post by Kiesecker, and following it is a response from the College Board, which owns the SAT and the PSAT exams.

By Cheri Kiesecker
 In schools all over the country, middle and high school students will soon take PSAT and SAT assessments. I’m a parent and after my child’s class was asked to take the PSAT 8/9 (given to eighth and ninth graders) this past October, I discovered that the College Board, owner of these assessments, solicits personal information from each student without parental consent.
Several weeks after the test, the College Board returned the completed PSAT answer sheets and test booklets to students once the exam had been scored and recorded. I was surprised to learn that the PSAT 8/9 answer sheet begins by asking many very personal questions of each student; though nowhere on the form or booklet does it say these questions are How the SAT and PSAT collect personal data on students — and what the College Board does with it - The Washington Post:



Technology “Disrupting” Teaching (Part 2) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice

Technology “Disrupting” Teaching (Part 2) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice:

Technology “Disrupting” Teaching (Part 2)

Image result for computer teacher

In the previous post, I argued that the onset of digital technologies since the 1990s had “disrupted” the print media beholden to a business model anchored in advertising revenues. Newspapers closed; reporters let go. Digital media spread swiftly and most Americans now get their news from screens, not newsprint.
Organizations that had not existed two decades ago such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter dispense news to their followers. New technologies had surely changed the institutional terrain of the newspaper world. But had these new technologies also irreversibly altered the practice of news gathering, writing, and publishing particularly investigative journalism?
I argued that core practices have remained constant in the midst of institutional meltdown. The practice of investigative journalism (as shown in procedural films, TV shows, and books such as “All the President’s Men,” “Lou Grant,” and “Spotlight”) not only still existed in the now smaller world of print media but also had mushroomed in cyberspace. Even with the proliferation of computer devices and software and their daily use in gathering and publishing news stories, reporters hewed to well-honed practices at  the heart of the craft called investigative journalism.
Have the new technologies that “disrupted” print media as a business done the same in public education? Have the new technologies used by schools and in classrooms altered the practice of teaching and learning? These questions I take up in this post.
Have the new technologies “disrupted” education?
The answer is no. The screeching rhetoric of new technologies “revolutionizing”  schooling in the U.S. and that  by 2020 online instruction at home and in the community will be how most children and youth learn (see hereherehere, and here)  is, well, talk. That rose-tinted future has yet to emerge from behind the curtain.
Surely, new technologies have spilled over public schools since the early 1980s and especially in the past decade. As student access to new devices and software has increased, so has teacher use in daily lessons. Laptops and tablets have become the new pen and paper in classrooms across the U.S. While for- and non-profit cyber schools have grown and online instruction has expanded in public schools,  bricks-and-mortar, age-graded public and private schools still remain the established institution they have been since the early 19th century. No “disruption” as predicted has occurred (see here and here).
Have the new technologies used by schools and in classrooms altered the practice of teaching and learning?
Depends on what “altered” means? Yes, teachers have said often in surveys and interviews that they now use new technologies to expand the resources students use in lessons, deepen the content they teach, and save time and energy in running down sources for their students while more efficiently recording grades and taking attendance. Using digital tools more frequently than  before, teachers have, indeed, changed how they access information, broaden the sources Technology “Disrupting” Teaching (Part 2) | Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice:


NEWSFLASH: Betsy DeVos Opens Mouth. Nonsense Falls Out | gadflyonthewallblog

NEWSFLASH: Betsy DeVos Opens Mouth. Nonsense Falls Out | gadflyonthewallblog:

NEWSFLASH: Betsy DeVos Opens Mouth. Nonsense Falls Out


Betsy DeVos opened her mouth-hole today and a load of crap fell out.
And somehow that’s news!
Our federal Education Secretary said Wednesday, “I’m not sure how [U.S. public schools] could get a lot worse on a nationwide basis than they are today.”
-Whether charter and voucher schools should be held to the same standards as traditional public schools.
-Whether guns belong on school campuses in reach of children.
-Whether the Department of Education should protect students with special needs.
-Whether the Individuals With Disabilities Act is a federal law (Spoiler Alert: It IS!).
-Oh! And what the heck’s the difference between proficiency and growth?
This woman is an idiot. Worse – she’s a rich idiot.
Why are we publishing a thing she says as anything other than standup comedy?
She knows nothing about public schools. She never went to them as a student. She NEWSFLASH: Betsy DeVos Opens Mouth. Nonsense Falls Out | gadflyonthewallblog:


Are Traditional Public Schools “Franchises”? | deutsch29

Are Traditional Public Schools “Franchises”? | deutsch29:

Are Traditional Public Schools “Franchises”?


According to Investopedia, a franchise is defined as follows:
A franchise is a type of license that a party (franchisee) acquires to allow them to have access to a business’s (the franchiser) proprietary knowledge, processes and trademarks in order to allow the party to sell a product or provide a service under the business’s name. In exchange for gaining the franchise, the franchisee usually pays the franchisor initial start-up and annual licensing fees.
Franchises are a very popular method for people to start a business, especially for those who wish to operate in a highly competitive industry like the fast-food industry. One of the biggest advantages of purchasing a franchise is that you have access to an established company’s brand name; meaning that you do not need to spend further resources to get your name and product out to customers.
In sum, the term franchise is a marketing term. And given the push to turn American public education into a marketed product/service under the auspices of “school choice,” it should come as no surprise that promoters of market-driven ed reform use business terminology to attempt to reframe American public education.
Consider, for example, Brooking Institute fellow Grover “Russ” Whitehurst’s usage of the term, “franchise,” in discussing his disagreement with the institution of the local-board-run community school in this March 29, 2017, Brookings video, “The 2016 Education Choice and Competition Index.” Below is Whitehurst’s first minute of his opening remarks, which precede a speech by US ed secretary Betsy DeVos:


Good morning. Glad to see you here, see some familiar faces. I know you’re here to hear Secretary DeVos talk, but you’ve got to sit through a little bit of me first.
We’re here today to think and talk about K-12 school choice, and we’re doing that in the context of publicly-funded education.
If we had this event, or an event with this title twenty years ago, it would have been mostly about the prospects of something that did not then exist. The traditional, school-district model of the delivery of public education was a monolith that completely dominated education through the end of the twentieth century. Education within each state was provided entirely by school districts governed by elected school boards. Each district had an exclusive franchise to provide educational services within its geographical boundaries, and within those boundaries, districts managed individual schools that themselves were organized as exclusive franchises within their own geographical student assignment zones.
In the above remarks, Whitehurst attempts to redefine traditional public education using economic language, but the language simply does not fit.
Traditional public school is not a for-profit venture. There is no dealing in school-Are Traditional Public Schools “Franchises”? | deutsch29: