Latest News and Comment from Education

Saturday, October 22, 2016

For Many Schools The Recession Never Ended : NPR Ed : NPR

For Many Schools The Recession Never Ended : NPR Ed : NPR:

For Many Schools The Recession Never Ended

Schools across the country are functioning on far less now than they did in 2008.

The Great Recession technically ended in June of 2009, but many of America's schools are still feeling the pinch.
A new study of state budget documents and Census Bureau data finds that the lion's share of spending on schools in at least 23 states will be lower this school year than it was when the recession began nearly a decade ago.
This analysis looked specifically at what's called general formula funding, which accounts for roughly 70 percent of the money states spend in their K-12 schools.
CBPP analysis of the Census Bureau's Public Elementary-Secondary Education 2014 Data and National Center for Education Statistics enrollment estimates.
LA Johnson/NPR
The report, from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, suggests that many of the nation's schools are being asked to educate a growing number of students without state lawmakers growing their budgets.
"Public investment in K-12 schools, which are crucial for communities to thrive and for the U.S. economy to offer broad opportunity, has declined dramatically in recent years," says Michael Leachman, director of state fiscal research at CBPP.
The report is a slurry of numbers, so the NPR Ed team pulled out a few of the most compelling figures.
  • As of 2014, the most recent year of available Census data, 35 states were still spending less overall per student than they did in 2008. Why does that matter? Because state dollars, on average, account for nearly half of a school's revenues. The other major source of funding comes from local governments. That's our next headline ...
  • 27 states saw their local funding drop from 2008 to 2014.
  • When you combine state and local dollars — which is most of the money schools survive on — overall funding dropped in 36 states.
That's right, 36 states were still living in 2008.
  • Arizona's schools saw the biggest percentage cut. From 2008 to 2014, state per-pupil spending dropped nearly 37 percent. Which helps make sense of this story, reported for NPR's School Money project, about schools turning to a four-day week to save money. Voters did recently approve a funding increase, though it's not clear how big a difference that will make.
  • Some anomalous news (in case this story's bringing you down): Because of a natural resources windfall (oil!), North Dakota's school spending skyrocketed, up 94 percent from 2008 to 2014.
  • Five states — Kansas, Oklahoma, North Carolina, Arizona and Wisconsin — didn't just cut For Many Schools The Recession Never Ended : NPR Ed : NPR:


Trump trickle-down could impact education board races | The Texas Tribune

Trump trickle-down could impact education board races | The Texas Tribune:

Trump trickle-down could impact education board races

Image result for trump effect down ballot
Several Democrats aiming to unseat incumbent Republicans on the State Board of Education say they believe the relative unpopularity of the Republican at the top of the ticket, Donald Trump, will help propel them to victory in the Nov. 8 general election. 
Approving textbooks, crafting curriculum standards and setting graduation requirements for the state’s more than 5 million public school students. The role of the Republican-dominated Texas Board of Education remains undoubtedly influential even as the Legislature has removed some of its powers over the decades following a series of embarrassing kerfuffles.
The stakes rarely get much buzz during the general election season, however. That’s because the 15 sprawling districts are drawn to be friendly to Republican or Democratic candidates — mostly the former — meaning the shakeups are usually reserved for the spring primary elections. 
But several Democrats aiming to unseat incumbent Republicans from the education board this fall say this year could be different.
Those candidates — two of whom are running for the third time — say the relative unpopularity of the Republican at the top of the ticket, Donald Trump, will help propel them to victory in the Nov. 8 general election. And observers and experts say their contention isn’t too far off base.
At least one SBOE race is “very much in play,” said Rice University political scientist Mark P. Jones. He’s referring to District 5, where Democrat Rebecca Bell-Metereau is attempting to unseat incumbent Republican Ken Mercer for the third time. The district reaches from Austin to San Antonio, extending northwest to cover several Hill County counties such as Llano and Kerr.
While Mercer — a fixture of the board’s far-right faction — is still the favorite to win, Jones noted the district is now “pink, not red” after the latest round of redistricting. With Trump also headlining the ticket, “the race stands to be the most tightly contested SBOE general election contest in more than a dozen years,” Jones wrote in an email.
Several recent polls show Trump is statistically tied with Democrat Hillary Clinton in GOP-friendly Texas.
Bell-Metereau, 66, a Texas State University English professor and former Fulbright scholar, notes that Mercer’s margin of victory has gotten smaller each time she’s run against him. InTrump trickle-down could impact education board races | The Texas Tribune: 

BRIDGEGATE TRIAL–The “extraordinarily weird” twist in the month-long trial. |

BRIDGEGATE TRIAL–The “extraordinarily weird” twist in the month-long trial. |:

BRIDGEGATE TRIAL–The “extraordinarily weird” twist in the month-long trial


The prosecution’s case in the Bridgegate trial has been living with a possibly fatal flaw for weeks–and, on Friday, that flaw threatened both the chances for convicting at least one defendant and also the credibility of the two-year federal investigation into the closing of entrance lanes at the George Washington Bridge in September, 2013. It has to do with an oddly worded email:
“I have an issue to discuss with you, extraordinarily weird even by my standards.”
Nearly a month ago, David Wildstein, the government’s chief witness against two allies of Gov. Chris Christie, told federal prosecutors he  sent that email to Bridget Anne Kelly, one of the defendants in the case, on August 12, 2013. Wildstein was working for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and Kelly was a deputy chief of staff in Christie’s office.
Wildstein said the message led to a telephone call with Kelly–but he couldn’t remember while he was testifying for the government exactly what he meant by the strange message and, more, he couldn’t remember what was said during the telephone call with Kelly that followed. On the stand last month, Wildstein repeatedly apologized but he just couldn’t remember what that message and call were all about.
Sounds strange. Wildstein had few memory problems while he testified for the government against Kelly and Bill Baroni, the former Port Authority deputy executive director and the trial’s other defendant.
On Friday, during the first hours of Bridget Kelly’s testimony in her own defense, she certainly remembered what that “extraordinarily weird” subject was: The so-called traffic study that would lead to massive traffic jams at the bridge–and, indirectly, to the downfall of Christie’s presidential ambitions.
“He (Wildstein) wanted Christie to be able to tout he had helped all those commuters,” Kelly said.
This wasn’t about punishing the mayor of Fort Lee–the government’s theory and the thrust of Wildstein’s testimony–it was about promoting Christie’s campaign among commuters using the bridge.
She said the study–which she believed to be genuine–would  ultimately be used for BRIDGEGATE TRIAL–The “extraordinarily weird” twist in the month-long trial. |:

SBE Agenda for November 2016 - State Board of Education (CA Dept of Education)

SBE Agenda for November 2016 - State Board of Education (CA Dept of Education):

SBE Agenda for November 2016

Agenda for the California State Board of Education (SBE) meeting on November 2-3, 2016.
Image result for big education ape SBE Agenda
State Board Members
  • Michael W. Kirst, President
  • Ilene W. Straus, Vice President
  • Sue Burr
  • Bruce Holaday
  • Feliza I. Ortiz-Licon
  • Patricia A. Rucker
  • Niki Sandoval
  • Ting L. Sun
  • Trish Williams
  • Olivia Sison, Student Member
  • Vacancy
Secretary & Executive Officer
  • Hon. Tom Torlakson
Executive Director
  • Karen Stapf Walters


Schedule of MeetingLocation
Wednesday, November 2, 2016 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time ±
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION 
Public Session.  Public Session, adjourn to Closed Session – IF NECESSARY.
California Department of Education 1430 N Street, Room 1101 
Sacramento, California 95814 
916-319-0827
Please see the detailed agenda for more information about the items to be considered and acted upon. The public is welcome.
Schedule of MeetingLocation
Thursday, November 3, 2016 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time ±
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

The Closed Session will take place at approximately 8:30 a.m. (The Public may not attend.) 
California Department of Education 1430 N Street, Room 1101

Sacramento, California 95814

916-319-0827
The Closed Session (1) may commence earlier than 8:30 a.m.; (2) may begin at 8:30 a.m., be recessed, and then be reconvened later in the day; or (3) may commence later than 8:30 a.m.

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA

Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation: Under Government Code sections 11126(e)(1) and (e)(2)(A), the State Board of Education hereby provides public notice that some or all of the pending litigation follows will be considered and acted upon in closed session:
  • California School Boards Association, et al. v. California State Board of Education and Aspire Public Schools, Inc.,Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. 07353566, CA Ct. of Appeal, 1st Dist., Case No. A122485, CA Supreme Court, Case No. S186129
  • Cruz et al. v. State of California, State Board of Education, State Department of Education, Tom Torlakson et al.,Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG14727139
  • D.J. et al. v. State of California, California Department of Education, Tom Torlakson, the State Board of Education, Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BS142775,CA Ct. of Appeal, 2nd Dist., Case No. B260075 and related complaint from the U.S. Department of Justice
  • Emma C.et al. v. Delaine Eastin, et al., USDC (No.Dist.CA), Case No. C-96-4179
  • Options for Youth, Burbank, Inc., San Gabriel, Inc. Upland, Inc. and Victor Valley, Notice of Appeal Before the Education Audit Appeals Panel, EAAP Case Nos. 06-18, 06-19- 07-07, 07-08 OAH Nos. L2006100966, L2006110025, L20070706022, L2007060728, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC 347454
  • Peoples v. State of California, State Board of Education, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC618619
  • Reed v. State of California, Los Angeles Unified School District, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Jack O’Connell, California Department of Education, and State Board of Education, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC432420, CA Ct. of Appeal, 2nd Dist., Case No. B230817, CA Supreme Ct., Case No. 5191256
  • Valenzuela v. Tom Torlakson, the California Department of Education, the State Board of Education, Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG16805941
  • Vergara et al. v. State of California, Governor Edmund G. Brown, Tom Torlakson, the California Department of Education, the State Board of Education, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC484642, CA Ct. of Appeal 2nd Dist., Case No. B253282, B253310


ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY
ALL ITEMS MAY BE HEARD IN A DIFFERENT ORDER THAN HOW THEY ARE LISTED ON THE AGENDA ON ANY DAY OF THE NOTICED MEETING
THE ORDER OF BUSINESS MAY BE CHANGED WITHOUT NOTICE
Time is set aside for individuals desiring to speak on any topic not otherwise on the agenda. Please see the detailed agenda for the Public Session. In all cases, the presiding officer reserves the right to impose time limits on presentations as may be necessary to ensure that the agenda is completed.
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY
Pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, any individual with a disability or any other individual who requires reasonable accommodation to attend or participate in a meeting or function of the California State Board of Education (SBE), may request assistance by contacting the SBE office at 1430 N Street, Room 5111, Sacramento, CA 95814; by telephone at 916 319-0827; or by facsimile at 916 319-0175.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

FULL BOARD AGENDA
Public Session Day 1

Wednesday, November 2, 20168:30 a.m. Pacific Time ±
California Department of Education

1430 N Street, Room 1101

Sacramento, California 95814
  • Call to Order
  • Salute to the Flag
  • Communications
  • Announcements
  • Report of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction
  • Special Presentations
    Public notice is hereby given that special presentations for informational purposes may take place during this session.
  • Agenda Items
  • Adjournment

AGENDA ITEMS DAY 1

PLEASE NOTE: Individual speakers will be limited to one minute each for public comment for all items Wednesday and Thursday.
For items 3 and 4 only, a group of five speakers may sign up together and designate one speaker who will be allocated a total of three minutes for the group.
Item 01 (DOC)
Subject: 2017-2018 State Board of Education Student Member: Recommendation of Three Finalists for Submission to the Governor for Consideration and Appointment.
Type of Action: Action, Information

Item 02 (DOC)
Subject: Reports from the 2016 Student Advisory Board on Education.
Type of Action: Information

Item 03 (DOC)
Subject: Developing an Integrated Local, State, and Federal Accountability and Continuous Improvement System: Approval of the Performance Standards for the Academic Indicator; Review of Recommendations on the Process for Local Educational Agencies to Evaluate and Report Progress on Local Performance Indicators; Update on How the Evaluation Rubrics Apply to Charter Schools; and Update on Continuing Developmental Work on the Evaluation Rubrics.
Type of Action: Action, Information

Item 04 (DOC)
Subject: The Local Control and Accountability Plan Template, California Code of Regulations, Title 5, Section 15497.5 – Adoption of the proposed Revised Local Control and Accountability Plan Template, pursuant to Education Code Section 52064(e).
Type of Action: Action, Information

Item 05 (DOC; 1MB)
Subject: Update on the Development of the California State Plan for the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Type of Action: Action, Information

Item 06 (DOC)
Subject: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress: Determination of the Release of Up to 10 Percent Withheld for the 2015–16 Educational Testing Service Contract.
Type of Action: Action, Information

Item 07 (DOC)
Subject: English Language Proficiency Assessments for California: Approve Commencement of a 15-Day Public Comment Period for Proposed Amendments to California Code of Regulations, Title 5, Sections 11518 through 11519.5.
Type of Action: Action, Information

Item 08 (DOC)
Subject: STATE BOARD PROJECTS AND PRIORITIES. Including, but not limited to, future meeting plans; agenda items; and officer nominations and/or elections; State Board appointments and direction to staff; declaratory and commendatory resolutions; Bylaw review and revision; Board policy; approval of minutes; Board liaison reports; training of Board members; and other matters of interest.
Type of Action: Action, Information



Ms. Katie's Ramblings: The New Best Way to Destroy Special Education

Ms. Katie's Ramblings: The New Best Way to Destroy Special Education:

The New Best Way to Destroy Special Education

Image result for Destroy Special Education

The best lies are always ones based in some truth.

The newest austerity project for districts across the nation, including the Chicago Public Schools, is to claim that special education budgets must be decimated: in the name of racial equality. Now, the refrain to destroy public services in the name of equality should sound familiar if you've been paying attention. Remember how corporate ed reformers claim that we must dismantle and privatize public education because of inequality, because of Civil Rights, because of racism? In fact, this is a favorite tactic of neoliberalism more broadly.

And now it's coming for special education.

Special ed has flown somewhat under the radar of the neoliberal education reform debate. Usually, it's brought up in the context of pushing out kids with special needs from "schools of choice" especially the charters where a significant disability is simply a liability on the books for free market privateers. These kids find themselves bounced around schools until they land back in the neighborhood school which must provide services, only now that school has been so striped resources as public money flows towards privatizers, the child languishes through schooling more unsupported than ever.

So now, districts that have had funding sources dry up-are looking to save money on the backs of their most fragile-but also most expensive-students: students with special needs.

Now, the one thing that stood in the way of this desire to slash costs, was that darned federally-protected document called an Individual Education Plan. There was legal recourse if this plan was not implemented. Charter or neighborhood, parents and kids had some 
Ms. Katie's Ramblings: The New Best Way to Destroy Special Education:

Trump surrogate: GOP candidate would dismantle ‘corrupted, incompetent urban school systems’ - The Washington Post

Trump surrogate: GOP candidate would dismantle ‘corrupted, incompetent urban school systems’ - The Washington Post:

Trump surrogate: GOP candidate would dismantle ‘corrupted, incompetent urban school systems’




A surrogate for Republican presidential candidate Donald J. Trump told a group of urban school superintendents on Friday that Trump would seek to do away with “corrupted, incompetent” public school systems in America’s cities, replacing them with charter schools and vouchers for private schools.
Such an approach would “encourage competition in the marketplace and eventually dismantle the corrupted, incompetent urban school districts that we have in America today,” said Carl Paladino, Trump’s New York State co-chairman, drawing audible boos from an audience composed largely of people who run the school districts Paladino criticized.
Paladino was unfazed: “A monopoly will not continue to work, it will not solve the problem,” he said, decrying what he described as school districts’ dysfunction and their “incestuous relationships with teachers unions.”
The remarks came at an education town hall in Miami on Friday in conjunction with the 60th annual conference of the Council of the Great City Schools, a coalition of urban school systems. Moderated by journalist Dan Rather, it featured Paladino — who is also a school board member in Buffalo, N.Y. — and Mildred Otero, a surrogate for and former senior adviser to Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, as well as three leaders of school systems in swing states.
Friday’s event represented a rare opportunity to hear in-depth discussion of education issues from the two major-party campaigns. The candidates themselves received no direct questions about their education policies during the three presidential debates, and the subject has received little attention on the campaign trail.
Otero, responding to Paladino’s broad criticisms of urban school systems, said it was wrongheaded to believe that there are no examples of success or improvement in urban education. Then she pivoted to Clinton’s plans to expand public preschool and address skyrocketing student debt.
Alberto Carvalho, superintendent of the nation’s fourth-largest school system in Miami-Dade County, took exception to Paladino’s premise that there’s something particularly wrong with urban schools. “Poor kids in non-urban districts often perform exactly like poor kids in urban districts,” Carvalho said. “The difference is there are a lot more poor kids in urban districts.”
Math and reading performance in urban districts trails the national average, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, known as the “Nation’s Report Card.” But urban districts have been gaining ground, slowly closing the gap with the rest of the country.
Paladino has been a controversial figure on the national political scene. In August, he told the New York Observer that there is “no doubt” that President Obama is a Muslim, a rumor many Trump surrogate: GOP candidate would dismantle ‘corrupted, incompetent urban school systems’ - The Washington Post:


Students Send Message: Milk Is Garbage | Huffington Post

Students Send Message: Milk Is Garbage | Huffington Post:

Students Send Message: Milk Is Garbage

2016-10-21-1477060383-7379349-milkisgarbage.png

Students are pouring hundreds of tons of plain milk into the garbage in Los Angeles schools each week. Maybe that’s because more than 88 percent of Los Angeles Unified School District students are predisposed to suffer from lactose intolerance. But instead of providing a healthful nondairy beverage that students might drink, LAUSD is compelling students to drink more milk by offering chocolate milk, which it had stopped serving in 2011.
Plain or chocolate, high-fat or low-fat, all milk can cause digestive symptoms, among other health dangers. And Latinos, African-Americans, and Asian-Americans who, according to the National Institutes of Health, are most likely to suffer from lactose intolerance comprise the majority of LAUSD’s student body: 74 percent, 8.4 percent, and 6 percent, respectively.
But LAUSD—which has designed four pilot programs to increase milk consumption—isn’t wholly responsible for pushing milk. The National School Lunch Program requires that schools offer milk with each meal—even though it’s clear that students are done with dairy.
They’re not alone. As the sales of almond milk and other plant-based milks have surged, sales of dairy milk have continued to plummet: Since the beginning of 2016, U.S. farmers have dumped 43 million gallons of milk.
Digestive issues aren’t the only reason students and other consumers are ditching dairy. Milk consumption is linked to bone fractures, heart disease, cancer, and even early death. But plant-based milks can provide all the calcium, vitamin D, and potassium without these health risks.
It’s time for the National School Lunch Program to allow LAUSD and other school districts to keep students healthy, reduce waste, and save money by moving the milk requirement off the menu.
2016-10-21-1477060426-2035628-dangersofdairymilklg.jpg
 Students Send Message: Milk Is Garbage | Huffington Post:

Anyone else surprised by strong opposition to Opportunity School District in new AJC poll? | Get Schooled

Anyone else surprised by strong opposition to Opportunity School District in new AJC poll? | Get Schooled:

Anyone else surprised by strong opposition to Opportunity School District in new AJC poll?

osdbutton
I have to admit surprise at the results of a new AJC poll finding significant opposition to Gov. Nathan Deal’s Opportunity School District, which is Amendment 1 on the Nov. 8 ballot.
The OSD requires a change to the state constitution because it gives the governor sweeping new powers to take control of local schools and the local taxes going to those schools. Those who control the Statehouse also control the ballot language so voters are being asked simply whether the state should intervene in failing schools. I thought the genial language of the ballot would ensure easy passage, but it appears voters are digging deeper on this complex question of local vs. state control and recoiling at what they are learning.
An earlier poll this year by WSB-TV also found a majority of Georgians were against the OSD, but the margin was not as wide. I suspect fierce TV ads against Amendment 1 are playing a role in souring voters on state takeover of schools. In addition, there have been dozens of public presentations about the implications of state takeover just in the last few weeks across Georgia.
It may be a public wariness of government overreach is also feeding the dissent.
People tend to trust government they can see and touch — locally elected officials who attend Friday night football games, shop at the Main Street Piggly Wiggly and go to the same church. Georgians understand who runs their local schools now; it may not be clear to them who will be in charge if the state seizes a school. The Opportunity School District vests tremendous power into a single individual, the appointed superintendent chosen by the governor. And that person is an unknown at this point.
Some poll results worth discussing: Despite the OSD being the signature legislation of a popular Republican governor, the proposal has the least support among Republican voters, 28 percent. It has the highest support among independents, 38 percent. Among Democrats, 34 percent support the OSD.
According to a news story this morning by AJC education writer Ty Tagami:
Gov. Nathan Deal’s proposed Opportunity School District has significant opposition just weeks ahead of the Nov. 8 election, according to a new Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll.
The results released Friday found likely voters siding nearly 2-1 against Amendment 1, the referendum that would create a statewide school district to take over Georgia’s lowest performing schools.
The poll question revealed more about the proposal than does the ballot question itself, which has been criticized by opponents as misleading because it does not clearly say that the state would take over schools.
The AJC poll found 34 percent of likely voters indicating they would vote for the measure while 59 percent were opposed and 8 percent undecided. Support was greater among men at 37 percent versus 31 percent for women; it was weakest among 
Anyone else surprised by strong opposition to Opportunity School District in new AJC poll? | Get Schooled:


UW-Madison undergraduate researchers: If you favor standardized testing, you're racist - The College Fix

UW-Madison undergraduate researchers: If you favor standardized testing, you're racist - The College Fix:

UW-Madison undergraduate researchers: If you favor standardized testing, you’re racist



The University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Daily Cardinal  highlighted a trio of undergraduate researchers this past week who allege that standardized testing “exemplifies systematic racism” which, among other things, hinders the college attendance of black Americans.
Juniors Tyriek Mack, Marquise Mays, and Tashiana Lipscomb presented their findings at the International Colloquium on Black Males in Education earlier this month.
“The group compiled research to create a narrative,” the article notes, “for how standardized testing came to be and found that the tests corroborated white supremacist tendencies of the creators.”
“Create a narrative,” eh?
The students didn’t have to dig all that hard to discover the rather unappetizing beginningsof such testing:
Standardized tests first entered American public schools in the 1920s, at the urging of eugenicists whose pseudoscience proclaimed that white males were naturally smarter.
One of these early eugenicists was Carl Brigham, a professor at Princeton University and author of the white supremacist manifesto, A Study of American Intelligence. Brigham developed the Scholastic Aptitude Test, known as the SAT. Some of the most important early voices in opposition to intelligence testing—especially in service of ranking the races—came from leading African American intellectuals such as W.E.B. Du Bois and Howard Long. Horace Mann Bond, in his work “Intelligence Tests and Propaganda,” noted in 1924 what today we call the “Zip Code Effect”—what standardized tests really measure is a student’s proximity to wealth and the dominant culture.
Certainly, contemporary concerns about the quantity of testing and certain biases within tests have merit; however, should we completely ditch standardized assessments merely due to their creators’ backgrounds?
Under such a standard, we would do away with access to abortions — because Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist who wanted to use the procedure to help produce “cleaner” races … and held other objectionable views on race (specifically towards blacks).
It’s highly unlikely (progressives) would ever agree to that proposal; why, then, completely abolish standardized exams?
Mr. Mack says that “Our role on this campus is to be able to use this, standardized testing, as UW-Madison undergraduate researchers: If you favor standardized testing, you're racist - The College Fix:


More money for schools at stake in two state measures

More money for schools at stake in two state measures:

More money for schools at stake in two state measures

Image result for yes Propositions 51 and
Image result for yes Propositions 55


Do California schools need more money to renovate campuses, build new facilities and provide services including full-time counselors, tutoring and reading specialists?
That's what voters will decide in two ballot measures appearing on the November ballot, Propositions 51 and 55.
Proposition 51 would provide $9 billion to renovate aging campuses and build new facilities. Four local school districts that are trying to pass their own bond measures in November would benefit if Proposition 51 passes because they could get matching funds for their construction projects. They are Fillmore Unified, Oak Park Unified, the K-8 Oxnard School District and Simi Valley Unified.
"The Legislature and governor have done nothing to help fund facilities in probably more than eight years," said Jeff Baarstad, a former superintendent of the Conejo Valley Unified School District who describes himself as a fiscal conservative and supports the proposition. "There are billions of dollars of projects waiting for funding."
  • Simi Valley needs to update 15 elementary schools that were built in the 1960s and early '70s, Superintendent Jason Peplinski said. The district, which has been trying to attract more families to its schools, could get an additional $50 million in matching state funds if its $239 million bond passes, Peplinski said.
  • The Oxnard district needs to build new schools to ease overcrowding, Superintendent Cesar Morales said. The district also plans to replace portable classrooms, update existing campuses, and renovate libraries, among other projects. The district stands to get an additional $69 million in matching state funds if its $142.5 million bond passes, Morales said. "This would allow us to maximize the investment the community would be making in our local bond," Morales said. "It doesn't help only our district, but others across the state that have a lot of need."
  • Oak Park, which could get $10 million in state funds if its $60 million bond passes, also plans to renovate schools, as well as upgrade technology and provide facilities and equipment for music, arts and other programs.
  • Fillmore Unified is asking voters to approve a $35 million bond that would primarily fund school renovations and safety systems.       
Proposition 55 would extend a tax on people earning more than $250,000 a year, with the money going to K-12 schools and community colleges. Voters approved that tax in 2012, under Proposition 30, which also provides health care for low-income children. If Proposition 55 fails, the income tax increase would expire at the end of 2018.
Proposition 30 was promoted as a one-time tax that would allow schools to recover from the recession when they were forced to slash their budgets. That's just one reason Baarstad doesn't support extending the tax.
"It was supposed to be a temporary tax in an economic crisis," Baarstad said. "The economy has improved, and now they want to come back and make it semi-permanent."
If the tax is extended, it would last until 2024. However, the sales tax that was part of Proposition 30 would not be extended.
That's another reason Baarstad doesn't support Proposition 55. Under Proposition 30, the cost was shared because everyone has to pay sales tax, he said. But under Proposition 55, the tax would be limited to California's wealthiest residents.
"I don't think having people vote on a specific tax on other people is good tax policy," Baarstad said.
But Alfonso Gamino, superintendent of the Santa Paula Unified School District, says the tax means he wouldn't have to worry about laying off teachers, shortening the school year or cutting services, as he did during the recession.
"It's allowed us to focus on services," Gamino said. "We can continue with stable budgets."
Both measures have support among the state's major education organizations. Proposition 51 supporters include the California School Boards Association, California State PTA and the Community College League of California, as well as California State Firefighters Association and the California School Nurses Organization.
Proposition 55 supporters include the California Teachers Association and Tom Torlakson, the state superintendent of public instruction.
But both propositions have critics, too. Opponents argue that the campaign for Proposition 51 is largely funded by construction companies that stand to gain if it passes. They also say it potentially favors wealthier districts that may be in a better position to work the system.
Like Baarstad, critics of Proposition 55 argue that it extends what was supposed to be a temporary tax. They also say that the Legislature needs to fundamentally change how it funds schools, rather than relying on temporary solutions, such as Proposition 55.
That fundamental change, however, could take time, and today's students shouldn't suffer while the Legislature figures out funding, said Stan Mantooth, Ventura County superintendent of schools.
"We just need to recognize that we have a responsibility to the future, and you can't do that by keeping your wallet closed," Mantooth said.
For more information on these and other state bond measures, see the Secretary of State's Official Voter Information Guide: http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov.
More money for schools at stake in two state measures: