Latest News and Comment from Education

Monday, June 27, 2016

Bruce Lesley: U.S. May Soon Stand Alone for Failing to Ratify U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child

U.S. May Soon Stand Alone for Failing to Ratify U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child:

U.S. May Soon Stand Alone for Failing to Ratify U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child


Twenty-five years after ratification of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Somalia and the South Sudan are taking steps to join 193 other countries around the world that have ratified the treaty. This is important news for children, as it provides a framework for nations — even oppressive ones — to at least acknowledge and recognize that children have special needs and should be provided the opportunity to, as UNICEF says, “develop their full potential, free from hunger and want, neglect and abuse.”
And just last week, it is noteworthy that Malala Yousafzia and Kailash Satyarthi were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize “for their struggle against the suppression of children and young people and for the right of all children to an education.”
These advocates for child rights were honored on a world stage that, unfortunately, may soon find the United States of America as the only nation left in the shadows for its failure to ratify the CRC.
The Convention on the Rights of the Child, which our nation was instrumental in writing during the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, was approved by the United Nations in 1989 and is now the world’s most accepted human rights treaty. Moreover, the CRC is, according to human rights expert Don Cipriani, “inspiring people in countries across the world to think differently about children.” He cites examples of how governments and citizens have positively changed policies to improve the lives and well-being of children in countries as diverse as Pakistan, India, Tanzania, Ireland, Japan, and Montenegro.


Despite these important examples of success and our country’s own significant role U.S. May Soon Stand Alone for Failing to Ratify U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child:

With A Brooklyn Accent: A Great Upstate NY Principal Announces Why She Has Decided to Retire

With A Brooklyn Accent: A Great Upstate NY Principal Announces Why She Has Decided to Retire:

A Great Upstate NY Principal Announces Why She Has Decided to Retire



Dear Parents,

                I am writing to you with an extremely heavy heart.  After almost twenty years in this beloved school, I am announcing my retirement.  This is very bittersweet for me, because I have come to really know and believe in the wonderful children you have graciously shared with me over the years.  I have had the wonderful opportunity to watch them as beginning Kindergarteners learning to navigate around the school independently, and learning the correct bus number to take them back home at the end of the school day.   Each of them has a different birthday, and they come in a variety of sizes.  Some have had the advantage of having attended a preschool program, but many have not.  They will all learn and develop in their own very unique learning style, and at their very own unique rate.  By no means are they standardized.  They are however, the very best that you have placed in our trust and care.  Our job is to nurture them, and guide them along the path in becoming lifelong learners, and kind, caring people.

                Throughout the course of my years, many of the children have shared with me just how overwhelming elementary school is for them.  There is so much for them to learn.  Some of them struggle to learn to read, and know that they are a little behind their classmates when it comes to the actual reading level that they are on --- in other words, each child learns to read at a different rate than their peers.  Some children have a form of dyslexia which has been medically diagnosed, and must work their way through all sorts of frustrations when learning to read.  They need the gift of time.  It is unfair for them to be subjected to taking a state mandated test that is 2 to 3 years above their grade level.  It is heartbreaking to watch children have meltdowns, and shutdown because the reading level, and questions on a state level test are so far above their reading level.

                This year, we were able to enrich our science curriculum through the use of environmental instructors from Earth Spirit Educational Programs.  Children in grades K through 5 were able to go outdoors throughout the school year.  Children need opportunities to get outdoors and learn about their environment, and nature.  They need to learn about their surroundings.  It is important that children feel a sense of freedom.  It is my hope that you will continue to support this excellent program for years to come. 

                I can no longer watch as corporate elites tear the heart out of public education due to their own personal greed and avarice.  I cannot stand by in silence as they promote five week teacher training programs, and student test scores linked to teacher evaluations.  The tests are developmentally inappropriate.  To continue to use these assessments in this manner is malpractice.  Parents have a right to see these tests and to know what the expectations are for their child.  You will need to be aware of the U.S. Secretary of Education, John King’s Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).  While ESSA allows states to pass laws allowing parents to opt children out of taking the state tests, the draft regulations would make any such state “opt out” law simply a vehicle to setup high opt-out schools to be labeled failing.  This would put parents in the position of, either exercising their right to direct their children’s education or, putting their children’s school into the crosshairs of the federal government’s over-reaching regulations.  Last year, Allendale had 75% opt-out.  We would be labeled a failing school according to this dichotomy.  The battle continues.  Please remain vigilant.  I certainly will.

                I am thankful for the opportunity to have watched thousands of children become fine, contributing members of our community, and feel With A Brooklyn Accent: A Great Upstate NY Principal Announces Why She Has Decided to Retire:

Mónica Ratliff for City Council 2017

Mónica Ratliff for City Council 2017:

Meet Ms. Ratliff

Monica Natural
My name is Mónica Ratliff and I'm a teacher and a school boardmember.
In 2013, voters of School Board District 6, which includes Sunland-Tujunga, where I make my home, Lake View Terrace, La Tuna Canyon, North Hills, Mission Hills, Shadow Hills, Sylmar and Pacoima, gave me the honor of serving on the Los Angeles Unified School District's Board of Education. With over 600,000 students and a budget of 7 billion dollars, it was a challenge I embraced with an immense amount of responsibility. I promised the voters of our district: transparency, accountability, safety, support of the arts and to support schools that work.
Our campaign to get to the board seat succeeded thanks to donations from hard-working teachers, neighbors, friends, family and believers.  Some even told me that they knew they were throwing their money away since they felt that I had no chance without any political connections. Opponents spent a combined 2.2 million dollars while we spent under 88 thousand dollars. Thanks to the faith of the voters, I was sworn in to the board seat not owing  anyone other than the voters.  And after my four year term ends in July 2017, I hope, with your help and support, to continue serving our area on the City Council again not owing anyone except you, the voter.
Please consider getting to know me if you don't already or getting to know me better if you do.  Also, please share your concerns and your potential solutions for our communities.  We're in this together and together we can make a difference. Email me at monicaratliff2017@gmail.com or give me a call at (818) 925-5797.
Thanks for visiting! See you in the neighborhood.  
                                                         Mónica Mónica Ratliff for City Council 2017:

Schools Matter: A KIPP Pre-K or a Yale Pre-K: You Choose, Part 1 + Earth to NPE

Schools Matter: A KIPP Pre-K or a Yale Pre-K: You Choose, Part 1:

A KIPP Pre-K or a Yale Pre-K: You Choose, Part 1

Two days ago The Oklahoman reported that "KIPP Reach Academy Principal Tracy McDaniel pulled his proposal off Monday's school board agenda because he said it doesn't have enough support" among Oklahoma City school board members.  

We must applaud those school board members' positions to protect the most vulnerable children of their city from the miseducative and punitive indoctrination that segregated KIPP Model schools provide for the black and brown children of the poor.

I came across a report published in 2015 by some Harvard public policy graduate students that examined the feasibility and advisability of developing Pre-K programs at Uncommon Schools, one of the infamous "no excuses" corporate charter chains based on the KIPP Model.  I will have more to say about the scary possibility of Uncommon Schools getting into the Pre-K business in another post.

A later section of appendices in the 90 page report includes comparisons of some very different Pre-K programs that were examined in the study.  Here are the 12 schools where researchers gathered data in preparation for their recommendations for Uncommon School:

Bank Street School for Children

The Coop School

Fieldston School

First Step NYC

Pre-Pave Academy

Pre-Prep (Public Prep)

Eliot Pearson Children’s School (Tufts)

Calvin Hill Day Care Center (Yale)

DC Prep

KIPP Grow

Powell Elementary

UDC Lab School

I have provided the data below on two of the schools to give readers an idea of the vast gaps in 
Schools Matter: A KIPP Pre-K or a Yale Pre-K: You Choose, Part 1:



 Earth to NPE: There is NOT an Opt-Out Provision in ESSA, So Stop Pretending

Three things to know about how L.A. schools are using your money - LA Times

Three things to know about how L.A. schools are using your money - LA Times:

Three things to know about how L.A. schools are using your money

 Tuesday, the Los Angeles Unified School District approved $7.6 billion in spending for the upcoming fiscal year. But where does that money go, and who decides how to spend it? Here are a few things to know about the 2016-17 budget.
1. Most of the money goes to salaries and benefits
Most of the general fund money— about $6.1 billion—goes toward salaries and benefits for certificated employees (mainly in the classroom) and classified employees (mainly out of the classroom).



In 2015-16, the school district had more than 60,000 full-time employees, including teachers, principals and school support staff who aren’t in the classroom. In the coming year, the district will pay the balance of a two-year, 10% raise for teachers and other employees. 
The district will also add more elective teachers to middle schools and high schools, and introduce teachers to make class sizes smaller for 55 elementary schools with the highest needs.
2. The district has to give more resources to high-needs students.
The district  probably will receive about $5.4 billion of its budget from the state through the Local Control Funding Formula, which gives extra money to districts based on the Three things to know about how L.A. schools are using your money - LA Times:


John Merrow: The Broad Prize Now Goes Only to Charter Schools | Diane Ravitch's blog

John Merrow: The Broad Prize Now Goes Only to Charter Schools | Diane Ravitch's blog:

John Merrow: The Broad Prize Now Goes Only to Charter Schools

Today, the Broad Prize for the nation’s best charter schools will be announced in Nashville at the annual meeting of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. The finalists are IDEA Public Schools, Success Academy Charter Schools and YES Prep Public Schools.
John Merrow laments here that the Broad Foundation–and its billionaire leader Eli Broad–has given up on public schools and has decided to drop some money into charter schools. There was no Broad Prize for urban districts either last year or in 2016. This is only right and just, because Eli Broad favors charter schools over public schools.
Eli Broad launched his Broad Prize for Excellence in Urban Education in 2002, when the first award of $1 million went to the Houston Independent School District. Houston must have been an unusually stellar district because it improved so much that it won the Broad Prize again in 2013. The next year, 2014, was the last year that the prize was awarded, and it went not to a big urban district but to Gwinnett County Public Schools in Georgia and to Orange County Public Schools in Florida. Eli Broad, mastermind of American education (a title shared with Bill Gates) decided that urban districts were no longer improving fast enough to satisfy him, and he suspended the Broad Prize for Urban Education. After all, how many times can you give the prize to Houston?
If you go to the Broad Foundation website, linked in John Merrow’s post, you may gag on some of its “beliefs.”
Like the first one: We believe public schools must remain public. Nothing about charter schools is public, except the money they get from government. Otherwise, they are managed by private boards, which do not hold open meetings, with finances that are neither transparent nor accountable, and with disciplinary rules that do not comply with state requirements for public schools. In short, they are not transparent, they are not democratically controlled, they are not accountable, and they are thus NOT public schools.
One would hope to believe that the Broad Foundation actually does believe that teachers deserve to be treated with respect as professionals, but you learn on this website that Broad is a major funder of StudentsMatter, the group promoting lawsuits to strip teachers of their right to tenure and seniority, both of which protect academic freedom.
Merrow writes that it is not surprising that Eli Broad has dropped the award for urban districts:
But that’s not really new news, as the Foundation’s own pie chart reveals. Since 1999, the Foundation has made $589,500,000 in John Merrow: The Broad Prize Now Goes Only to Charter Schools | Diane Ravitch's blog:
 

Bob Braun: Who Pays the Salary of Chris Cerf’s Chief of Staff in Newark? | Diane Ravitch's blog

Bob Braun: Who Pays the Salary of Chris Cerf’s Chief of Staff in Newark? | Diane Ravitch's blog:

Bob Braun: Who Pays the Salary of Chris Cerf’s Chief of Staff in Newark?
Newark’s shameful response to Cerf’s charms and lies. | - http://www.bobbraunsledger.com/?p=5351

Bob Braun has written an astonishing column about the arrogance of power.
Chris Cerf, who was previously the Commissioner of Education in New Jersey, stepped in to take control of the Newark public schools after the unpopular Cami Anderson stepped down. Cerf is a bona fide reformer, having previously worked for for-profit Edison Schools and as deputy chancellor to Joel Klein in New York City.
Cerf’s chief of staff is De’Shawn Wright, who began his education career in Teach for America, then moved from one policy position to another.
Braun stumbles upon a mystery: Who pays Wright’s salary?
Wright, a champion of charter schools in Washington, DC, New York, and Newark, and past associate of Cerf and Cerf’s protégé and predecessor, Cami Anderson, is Cerf’s chief of staff, according to an organizational chart released at Tuesday night’s board meeting. Wright is paid a six figure salary but exactly how much is a secret–as is the source of his income.
Although Wright is probably the second most powerful figure in the Newark schools, he doesn’t work for the Newark schools.
Got that? Let’s repeat it: Although Wright is probably the second most powerful figure in the Newark schools, he doesn’t work for the Newark schools.
Who does he work for? Probably for the Fund for Newark’s Future–otherwise known as what’s left of the $100 million Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg gave to the Newark schools. But that hasn’t yet been confirmed because the fund is a private organization and not subject to New Jersey’s Open Public Records Act (OPRA). Or some other private foundation devoted to the expansion of charter schools.

Charter schools founder Steve Barr weighs 2017 challenge to Garcetti - LA Times

Charter schools founder Steve Barr weighs 2017 challenge to Garcetti - LA Times:
Green Dot Charter Schools founder Steve Barr weighs 2017 challenge to Garcetti


The founder of a prominent chain of Los Angeles charter schools said Wednesday he is considering running for mayor in 2017, the second person in as many days to muse aloud about challenging incumbent Mayor Eric Garcetti.
Steve Barr, who established the successful Green Dot Charter Schools group and has been a high-profile player in the battle to overhaul the L.A. school system, said his exploration of a potential run was driven by frustration over what he described as Garcetti's hands-off approach to public education.
Although the mayor in L.A. has no formal control over the school district, Barr said Garcetti had abdicated any meaningful involvement in the school system — in contrast to Garcetti's predecessor, former Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who placed education reform at the core of his agenda.
Barr said he believes Garcetti is avoiding education issues out of fear of alienating the powerful interest groups involved in the schools debate.
"When people move to a new neighborhood, their first question is not, 'What's the water system like?' or 'Are there enough press conferences about climate change this week?' It's, 'What are the schools like?'" Barr said. "It seems I've talked to at least a half-dozen people who will tell you he won't get involved because it's too controversial."
Barr, 56, of Silver Lake, said he is meeting with potential supporters and donors but has not decided whether to run. He said he wants to enter the race but will only do so if he can see a path to building a campaign with adequate political and financial backing. He said he expects to make his decision by the beginning of April.
Villaraigosa's foray into public education saw mixed results. His effort to assert mayoral control of the school district, emulating the systems in cities such as New York and Chicago, was defeated in court.
However, he succeeded in establishing direct control over a group of district schools and Charter schools founder Steve Barr weighs 2017 challenge to Garcetti - LA Times:


An Educated Parent Voice is a Stronger Parent Voice. | Dad Gone Wild

An Educated Parent Voice is a Stronger Parent Voice. | Dad Gone Wild:

AN EDUCATED PARENT VOICE IS A STRONGER PARENT VOICE.


Earlier this week, I commented on the education reform movement’s brilliant use of language. This week, another component of their modus operandi revealed  itself. Over the years, I’ve noticed that the education reform crowd seems to have incredibly thin skin. If they feel even slightly questioned, they are quick to jump on the defensive. One of their favorite tools to use for their defense is the newspaper editorial.
Last week, a lot of folks had questions about Nashville Rise’s true mission and exactly who was footing the bill for their operations. So of course, it was time for an editorial, and Nashville Rise co-founder Wendy Tucker did not disappoint. In this editorial, there are a few interesting nuggets.
First of all, Ms. Tucker reiterates that Nashville Rise is “a parent-led, grassroots coalition of district, charter, magnet, and private school parents from across Davidson County who have joined forces to advocate for high-quality education for every child” and who “generally tune out negativity and focus on our work. When the integrity of our parent volunteers is maligned, however, we feel compelled to respond.” See what she did there? Very subtly and delicately, she shifted the conversation from questioning Nashville Rise and its intentions to defending parents who were supposedly being maligned.
Before we go any further here, let’s get one thing perfectly clear. Nobody is questioning the integrity or the validity of any of the parents who are involved in Nashville Rise. I’ve always said the more voices in the conversation the better, and everybody is welcome to their own opinions as long as they can defend them with empirical evidence. Point being, if you are advocating for educational policy that impacts more than just your child, you need to be able to defend it and site the sources for your opinions. I don’t think that’s too much to ask.
Which leads us to a question I’ve asked a couple of Nashville Rise supporters this An Educated Parent Voice is a Stronger Parent Voice. | Dad Gone Wild:


Just Like Michelle Rhee's Students first only BETTER


Astroturf lobbying refers to political organizations or campaigns that appear to be made up of grassroots activists but are actually organized and run by corporate interests seeking to further their own agendas. Such groups are often typified by innocent-sounding names that have been chosen specifically to disguise the group's true backers


Just Like Michelle Rhee's
 Students first Astroturf lobbying (only Better) 

Democratic Party's Draft Platform Focuses on ZIP Codes, 'School-to-Prison Pipeline' - Politics K-12 - Education Week

Democratic Party's Draft Platform Focuses on ZIP Codes, 'School-to-Prison Pipeline' - Politics K-12 - Education Week:

Democratic Party's Draft Platform Focuses on ZIP Codes, 'School-to-Prison Pipeline'


As part of the run-up to the Democratic National Convention in roughly a month's time, the Democratic Party released a draft of the party's official policy platform on June 25. So what does it say about K-12 education? electionslug_2016_126x126.jpg
There's not a whole lot, but there are a couple of issues that might be familiar to regular readers. The draft says the party supports supplying the resources educators need to "raise achievement for all students," and "demands strong public schools in every zip code."
That latter phrase comes straight from folks like American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten, whose union endorsed presumptive nominee Hillary Clinton last year for the Democratic nomination—see her reference to the need for an education system "that gives every child, no matter her ZIP code, a great education" in 2010 U.S. Senate testimony, for example.
And National Education Association President Lily Eskelsen García also used a similar phrase last year during the push to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act—the NEA also backed Clinton for the Democratic nomination last year.
Although you won't find the phrase in the platform highlights released by the party, the "school-to-prison pipeline" also gets attention. That's according to Maya Harris, a senior policy adviser to Clinton and her campaign's official representative to the committee that's creating the party platform. 
"For the first time ever, our platform calls for ending mass incarceration, shutting down the school-to-prison pipeline, and taking on the challenges of systemic racism," Harris wrote on the campaign website June 26.
Harris doesn't say anything more about the issue, although the draft platform does call for the end to racial profiling, among related issues. Last February, Clinton proposed changes she said would help end the pipeline, such as the end to "zero tolerance" discipline policies in schools based on automatic student suspensions. And it's been on the minds of officials at the U.S. Department of Education for some time, including former Secretary of Education Arne Duncan.
The final party platform will be approved in a meeting taking place July 8-9, and will then be presented for ratification at the Democratic National Convention later that month.Democratic Party's Draft Platform Focuses on ZIP Codes, 'School-to-Prison Pipeline' - Politics K-12 - Education Week:

Don't miss another Politics K-12 post. Sign up here to get news alerts in your email inbox.
Follow us on Twitter at @PoliticsK12.
 

Malloy destroys Connecticut’s regional hospitals, Jepsen and Democrats fail to act - Wait What?

Malloy destroys Connecticut’s regional hospitals, Jepsen and Democrats fail to act - Wait What?:

Malloy destroys Connecticut’s regional hospitals, Jepsen and Democrats fail to act


While national attention has focused on the Malloy administration’s inappropriate relationship with the insurance industry and the merger of CIGNA and Anthem, few in Connecticut are fully aware that Malloy’s disastrous budget and regulatory policies are leading to the demise of Connecticut’s historic system of regional hospitals and hospitals that are owned and operated by nonprofit entities based in Connecticut.
From The Journal Inquirer, via the Hartford Business Journal, comes more news about the destruction of Connecticut.  In ECHN sale gets final OK; State officials expect end of July completion (6/13/2016) and State gives conditional OK to Waterbury Hospital sale (6/26/16), Connecticut citizens have the opportunity to learn more about the repercussions of Malloy’s unprecedented attacks on Connecticut’s once great system of regional hospitals that were dedicated to the health of the citizens and communities in which they served.
Instead of protecting these important community and health assets, Governor Malloy and his administration – with the support of the Connecticut legislature – have undermined Connecticut’s hospitals and set up a system in which these vital institutions are being turned over to out-of-state, for-profit entities that see Connecticut’s citizens as simply an opportunity to make a buck at the expense of our health and our communities.
Few, except for the Connecticut Citizen Action Group (CCAG), have been stepping up to fight Malloy’s destructive policies.  Among those dedicated to the “get-along-to-go-along” approach to politics and governance has been Attorney General George Jepsen who shouldMalloy destroys Connecticut’s regional hospitals, Jepsen and Democrats fail to act - Wait What?: " RSS" 

The Fate of Oakland’s Celebrated American Indian Public Charter School, After the Diversion of $3.8 Million to Someone’s Bank Account | Diane Ravitch's blog

The Fate of Oakland’s Celebrated American Indian Public Charter School, After the Diversion of $3.8 Million to Someone’s Bank Account | Diane Ravitch's blog:

The Fate of Oakland’s Celebrated American Indian Public Charter School, After the Diversion of $3.8 Million to Someone’s Bank Account


Once upon a time, the American Indian Public Charter School in Oakland, California, received national attention for its high test scores. In a book by David Whitman, called Sweating the Small Stuff: Inner-City Schools and the New Paternalism (2008), the AIPCS was identified as one of the six best no-excuses schools in the nation. (In 2009, Whitman became Arne Duncan’s speech writer.) Its leader, Ben Chavis, was showered with praise by national education writers, TV pundits, and politicians. Based on its stellar data, reformers ranked it the best school in the nation. See here and here , including Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, George Will, and many more.
Critics charged that Chavis got those astonishingly high scores by pushing out the children who were American Indian and replacing them with children of Asian descent.
Chavis’s style of leadership was brutal. He frequently made remarks demeaning racial and ethnic groups, complained about multiculturalism and unions, and punished children for minor infractions. Read here for a few of his more offensive comments.
He got results! Higher test scores.
But a state audit disclosed that $3.8 million went missing. Apparently much of it went to pay rent to the owner of the buildings, which was Chavis. Chavis resigned. He has since moved to North Carolina, where he is “a coveted speaker” on the free market view of capitalism and education.”
Chavis never received any punishment for the money he paid himself and his wife’s businesses.
 

Bill Gates Just Pumped $6.4M into California for Common Core | deutsch29

Bill Gates Just Pumped $6.4M into California for Common Core | deutsch29:

Bill Gates Just Pumped $6.4M into California for Common Core

It seemed that Bill Gates’ Common Core push had cooled. As of June 01, 2016, I had seen no grants specific to Common Core listed on Gates’ “awarded grants” website. However, as of June 26, 2016, it seems that the first two Common Core grants for 2016 have indeed appeared on Gates’ site.
The combined amount for the two grants is $6.4 million.
Both are associated with California.
The first is to San Francisco-based WestEd. The Gates goal is to get teachers to buy into Common Core via WestEd’s “establishing local relationships”:

Date: May 2016
Purpose: to support and scale Common Core State Standards implementation and leverage established local relationships and teacher leaders to drive deeper use of high quality, standards-aligned tools and practices
Amount: $4,350,875
The second is to Cal State Fullerton for a one-day, statewide teacher pep rally that is supposed to ignite Common Core buy-in:

Date: May 2016
Purpose: to convene large numbers of teachers on a single day in regions 
Bill Gates Just Pumped $6.4M into California for Common Core | deutsch29: