Latest News and Comment from Education

Sunday, March 18, 2012

A Million Teachers Prepare to March Out the Classroom Door - Living in Dialogue - Education Week Teacher

A Million Teachers Prepare to March Out the Classroom Door - Living in Dialogue - Education Week Teacher:


A Million Teachers Prepare to March Out the Classroom Door

Follow me on Twitter at @AnthonyCody
The Metlife survey of American teachers has been much discussed in recent weeks. The biggest red flag I see waving here is the more than 50% increase, over the past two years, in the number of teachers who are likely to leave the profession in the next five years (from 17% to 29%). Assuming this data is accurate, this amounts to more than a million teachers who are preparing to march out of our classrooms. I wonder if the teaching profession as it is now being redesigned and redefined is one that any of us would have chosen when we began teaching? And I especially wonder who would choose to teach in a school with a high level of poverty?
Here is what the Metlife report says:
Teachers are less satisfied with their careers; in the past two years there has been a significant decline in teachers' satisfaction with their profession. In one of the most dramatic findings of the report, teacher satisfaction has decreased by 15 points since the MetLife Survey of the American Teacher measured job satisfaction two years ago, now reaching the lowest level of job satisfaction 

“Testing Fan” Mitt Romney Serves Up Anti-Teacher Union Red Meat on FOX News Sunday | Scathing Purple Musings

“Testing Fan” Mitt Romney Serves Up Anti-Teacher Union Red Meat on FOX News Sunday | Scathing Purple Musings:


“Testing Fan” Mitt Romney Serves Up Anti-Teacher Union Red Meat on FOX News Sunday

James Kitfield writing in the National Journal takes this snippet from Mitt Romney’s interview with Bret Baier:
 Romney reiterated his support for the testing requirements in the 2001 “No Child Left Behind Act,” but promised as president to push back against a federal teachers’ union that has too much power and often “overwhelms” states and local school districts.
Romney actually mentioned teacher unions twice in his comment on ed policy. So Mitt’s a testing guy, eh? No surprise there as one of his ed policy advisors  is a Jeb Bush ally.  Here’s a bit from something I wrote in December 2011:
Perhaps what Romney has in mind for education policy is revealed in whom he’s chosen as 

Who needs a WAIVER:The Myth of Parent Rights under NCLB

Parent Rights under NCLB:


What Parents Need to Know About 
School District Policy
No Child Left Behind is the new education plan that was signed into law by President Bush in January of 2002. It’s designed to improve student achievement and help schools do a better job of teaching. The law includes a number of important opportunities for parents to be involved with the schools. This Tip Sheet, from the Kansas Parent Information Resource Center (KPIRC), is designed to help parents understand their rights under the law.

Every school district that receives Title I funds must have a written Title I parent involvement policy that is developed with and approved by parents of participating Title I children, and evaluated every year. This policy must explain how the district will involve parents in developing its Title I plan and help parents know how to be included in decision-making about the program and in the schools. A school or district can receive Title I funds if a certain percentage of its students are from low-income families. Ask your principal if your school receives Title I funds.

Steps to take and questions to ask:
Call your school superintendent’s office. Ask to see a copy of your district’s Title I parent involvement policy and find out the following:

 How were parents involved in developing, approving, and reviewing the policy?
The law says the policy must be developed jointly with parents, agreed on with parents, and distributed to parents in a language and format that they can understand. In addition, the district must conduct, with the involvement of parents, an annual review of the effectiveness of the parent/family involvement policy in increasing the participation of parents/families and use the review to identify and correct any barriers to parental participation.

 Does the policy explain clearly how parents, including those with limited English proficiency, will be involved in school review and improvement?
The law says that the district must state how parents will be involved in addressing academic issues for schools In Need of Improvement.

 How will the district help Title I schools engage parents in activities to improve student achievement?
The law says that districts will look at how the schools are involving parents and will provide technical assistance to schools In Need of Improvement in carrying our parental involvement activities and plans.

 What does the policy require schools to do?
The law says that schools In Need of Improvement must have school improvement plans that include ways to effectively involve parents in the school.

 Does the policy apply only to Title I schools, or to all schools in the district?
The law says that the policy has to apply to Title I schools, but parents can push to ensure that all schools are covered.

 How will the district make sure that the schools are fully involving parents and families?

The district must review the actions and activities that the schools are using to involve parents to make sure that these are effective.

How does the district connect with parent plans in programs for young children, such as Head Start, Parents as Teachers and Even Start?
The law says that districts must coordinate and integrate Title I parent involvement strategies with those of programs such as these.

The district parent involvement policy must also explain how the district will work with schools to:


  • Explain state standards and annual test results to parents.

  • Let parents know how they can be involved in the school.


  • Help parents work together with teachers to make sure students are doing the best they can.

  • Provide materials, information and other resources to help parents with home learning activities, such as telling stories, reading, playing and talking to students.

  • Find out from parents what’s the best way to reach out to all parents so they can be involved as equal partners.

  • Other things parents can do to ensure that the district policy meets the needs of all parents:


Ask your district to consider developing a district parent advisory council if one does not already exist. This council can assist in evaluating the current policy, oversee the development of a new policy, and identify needs at Title I schools that the district should address.

Submit written comments if the district’s Title I plan is not satisfactory to parents of Title I students.



The district must include these comments when submitting its application to the state for Title I funds.
The state education agency can require changes in the district’s parental involvement policies and practices if they do not meet Title I requirements.


For more information about No Child Left Behind visit the following web sites:
The US Department of Education’s no Child Left Behind web site at 
http://www.nclb.gov

Jane Addams PTSA passes anti-charter school resolution | Seattle Education

Jane Addams PTSA passes anti-charter school resolution | Seattle Education:


Jane Addams PTSA passes anti-charter school resolution

On February 28, 2012, The Jane Addams PTSA board passed the following resolution:
WHEREAS Washington State public schools are chronically underfunded, to the detriment of educational opportunities, staffing, and materials;

WHEREAS the Washington State Supreme Court has ruled that the State of Washington is not fulfilling its constitutional obligation to fully fund public schools;

WHEREAS it has not been demonstrated that charter schools provide better educational outcomes than public schools;

WHEREAS charter schools allow the possibility of shifting money from public schools to private enterprises;
WHEREAS time spent on divisive issues like charter schools diverts time and resources needed to fulfill obligations to existing public schools;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Jane Addams PTSA urges the Washington State Legislature to oppose legislation promoting charter schools in the State of Washington, and to concentrate on fulfilling its paramount obligation according to the Constitution of the State of Washington, to fully fund and support Washington’s public schools.

DON'T SELL OUT AMERICA 

Commentary: The shoe, the gourd & integration | EdNewsColorado

Commentary: The shoe, the gourd & integration | EdNewsColorado:


Commentary: The shoe, the gourd & integration

Written by  on Mar 18th, 2012. | Copyright © EdNewsColorado.org
Alan Gottlieb is publisher of Education News Colorado. The views expressed below are his alone and do not reflect the positions of EdNews or the Public Education and Business Coalition.
I can think of no better preface to this piece than this wonderful clip from Monty Python’s Life of Brian:
A lively comment stream last week on an Education News Colorado story about Denver’s new SchoolChoice system prompted me to take a journey into the not-too-distant past. From 2001-2007, the second two-thirds of my decade at The Piton Foundation, I focused a lot of attention and a fair number of dollars on promoting socio-economic school integration.
I believed then, as I do today, that integrated schools serve society well in a number of ways. While I subscribe to the softer arguments about promoting diversity and tolerance, what I found most compelling were the data on how low-income students fare better in economically mixed schools.
I won’t rehash the arguments here, but you can look back at some of the research I commissioned while at 

Grumpy Educators: Illinois Parents: "No good reasons for this excessive testing."

Grumpy Educators: Illinois Parents: "No good reasons for this excessive testing.":


Illinois Parents: "No good reasons for this excessive testing."

ALEC Exposed in Wisconsin | Seattle Education

ALEC Exposed in Wisconsin | Seattle Education:


ALEC Exposed in Wisconsin

Wisconsin Representative Mark Pocan  explains in a brilliant speech how ALEC  is working to eliminate public education in the state of Wisconsin specifically in a bill regarding vouchers and special education funding that’s right out of the ALEC playbook almost word for word.
This is from the Assembly floor session on March 13th 2012.
PopoutFrom Wisconsin Lawmaker Calls Out Corporate Front Group ALEC For Writing School Privatization Bill:
The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is the most powerful corporate front group 

Sunday links. « Fred Klonsky

Sunday links. « Fred Klonsky:


Sunday links.


Park Ridge Education Association IEA RA delegate Jerry Mulvihill at the mic, wearing orange to make sure he’s seen by the chair.
They are smuggling books by Latino authors into Arizona. The Arizona legislature has banned books and curriculum  that promote “ethnic solidarity.”
The Walton family has a plan and the money to implement it. They want to destroy public education. 
Joel Klein, Condi Rice and the military-business-education reform complex.
Cecily McMillan had her ribs cracked and suffers a seizure after being beaten by the NYPD at Zucotti Park yesterday. Video.
Matt Taibbi on Bank of America.  Too crooked to fail.
Our old high school history teacher and Basketball coach,

School reform legend prepares to take over wayward John McDonogh High School | NOLA.com

School reform legend prepares to take over wayward John McDonogh High School | NOLA.com:


School reform legend prepares to take over wayward John McDonogh High School

Published: Sunday, March 18, 2012, 7:30 AM     Updated: Sunday, March 18, 2012, 7:36 AM