Can a Constitutional amendment save California schools?

Read more: http://www.sdnn.com/sandiego/2010-03-20/politics-city-county-government/can-a-constitutional-amendment-save-california-schools#ixzz0ip4aSXbR

President Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan, former superintendent of Chicago schools, are on a mission to reform public education. The president first proposed awarding nearly $4.5 billion in incentive grants to states with the best plans to reform their education laws and schools. Next, in a proposal made public last week, Obama outlined the changes he wants to make to the Bush-era No Child Left Behind Act.
Both proposals are largely positive, but neither is likely to do what state and local education reform efforts have failed to do for decades: permanently increase the performance of schools that chronically fail their students.
Obama's changes would end the misguided No Child Left Behind policy of penalizing a well-functioning school because one segment of its population, children with disabilities or non-native speakers of English, for example, failed to make adequate yearly progress toward a fixed target. Instead, the progress each student makes, no matter what their starting point, would be what counts. The crowning achievement of No Child Left Behind, its insistence that all children, no matter their ability or background, get the best education possible remains. But schools would be rated not just on test scores but on factors like graduation rates, attendance and teacher turnover.
The reforms made under what is now called the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, are also designed to end the ability of states to dumb down assessment tests so, as in the fictional Lake Wobegon, all children could be if not above average, at least average. The willingness of states to cheat actually points to the need, in a mobile 21st-century world, for national rather than state education standards.
Similarly, Obama wants states to develop a rational, effective way, based only partially on student test performance, to assess the effectiveness of teachers and administrators. Ideally, the best state measurements systems should become the template for a national model for evaluating educator performance.
The new act would give better-run schools more flexibility in their approach to meeting education goals, but it leaves consistently failing schools with just four options: instituting a turnaround plan and firing the principal and half the staff;

For years the Texas State Board of Education has fallen somewhere between “embarrassment” and “disgrace.” But lately it's reached a new low: hijacking our kids' textbooks to teach a mindset that's downright un-American.
In its revamp of the state's social studies curriculum, a majority of the board has consistently voted to reshape our history. Instead of the messy, complicated past, the extremist members prefer a simple story of triumphant Christian soldiers.
Last week the board voted to remove Thomas Jefferson — Thomas Jefferson! — from a list of Enlightenment thinkers who changed the world. The Enlightenment, with its emphasis on reason over tradition, doesn't sit well with the board.
Equally inconvenient is the Constitution's First Amendment, which begins: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” The idea — one of those brave young Enlightenment ideas — was that the United States doesn't officially embrace any single religion.
We are a democracy, not a theocracy; a live-and-let-live country where we're all free to worship as we choose. It's a crucial idea, and one that separates Texas from the Taliban.
But the board didn't like it. By 10-5, it voted down a proposal that teachers “examine the reasons the Founding Fathers protected religious freedom in America by barring government from protecting or disfavoring any particular religion over all others.”
Religious freedom? Phooey.
How did we get into this mess? Unfortunately, we elect our board officials in partisan elections that few Texans notice. And since democracy works only when people pay attention, it's easy for extremists to slide into office.
You could argue that democracy is already repairing that wound, that the board has become so terrible that we voters have started to pay attention. In the most recent Republican primary, of the five ultraconservative incumbents running, three lost outright, and one is in a runoff.