Latest News and Comment from Education

Friday, July 24, 2026

THE GREAT CHINESE TAKEOUT CRISIS HOW THE WHITE HOUSE ORDERED EVERY AI ON THE MENU


THE GREAT CHINESE TAKEOUT CRISIS HOW THE WHITE HOUSE ORDERED EVERY AI ON THE MENU

WASHINGTON — In what insiders are calling "the most chaotic dinner order since the Last Supper," the White House descended into complete pandemonium Tuesday evening when senior officials attempted to order Chinese food—or more specifically, Chinese AI models.

The crisis began innocently enough. President Trump, surrounded by half-eaten Big Mac wrappers and a commemorative KFC bucket signed by the Colonel himself, was overruled by Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Chief of Policy Stephen Miller, who insisted the administration needed "a change in diet."

"We're going Chinese," Wiles declared, slamming a menu of AI models onto the Resolute Desk with the force of a woman who has had enough of finding hamburger grease on classified documents.

Trump, naturally, protested. "Nobody loves Chinese more than me—I've eaten at the best Chinese restaurants, tremendous restaurants—but have you seen the new Triple Stacker at McDonald's?"

But Wiles and Miller held firm. Chinese it would be. What they didn't anticipate was that choosing which Chinese would trigger the most intense Cabinet food fight since the Nixon administration.

The Menu Meltdown

Vice President JD Vance immediately threw his support behind DeepSeek, arguing passionately about its "unmatched cost-to-performance efficiency" and "MIT open-weight license." When pressed on whether he actually understood what that meant, Vance pivoted to discussing his grandmother's opinions on artificial intelligence, which somehow segued into a fifteen-minute story about growing up in Ohio.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth pounded the table for MiniMax, insisting that any AI worth its salt needed "multimodal processing capabilities and native real-time audio interaction." When reminded that they were ordering dinner, not planning a military operation, Hegseth replied, "Same difference," and began doing push-ups to assert dominance.

Then RFK Jr. entered the fray with perhaps the most RFK Jr. contribution imaginable: "I want whichever one has the most roadkill ingredients."

A long silence followed.

"Sir, these are AI models, not actual food," an aide whispered.

"Even better," RFK Jr. responded, eyes gleaming. "No seed oils."

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, squinting at his phone, announced that Kimi "looked good," though he appeared to be reading the description upside down. "It says here it has 'massive context windows.' I like big windows. Very important for commerce."

Science and Technology Policy Director Michael Kratsios, the only person in the room who seemed to actually understand what they were discussing, made an impassioned case for the Qwen family, citing its "multilingual versatility, rapid token speed, and Apache 2.0 licensing that makes it the workhorse of the Chinese open-source community."

Everyone stared at him blankly.

"It's... fast?" he tried again.

"SOLD!" shouted three Cabinet members simultaneously, though none could explain why.

Stephen Miller, veins bulging with the intensity of a man who has Opinions, demanded "anything that had Moonshot" in it, apparently confusing the Kimi K3's developer with his own policy ambitions. When informed that Moonshot AI was actually a Chinese company currently accused of stealing American IP, Miller's head nearly exploded. "Then we'll order it ironically," he declared, which somehow made sense to everyone present.

The Executive Order to End All Orders

Susie Wiles, watching the chaos unfold with the weary resignation of a parent at a children's birthday party, made an executive decision.

"Fine. We're ordering ALL OF IT."

The room erupted in cheers.

"DeepSeek V4 Pro for the math nerds, Qwen 3.5 Plus for the enterprise people, GLM-5.2 for whatever the hell Zhipu AI does, Kimi K3 for the people who want to spend fifteen dollars per million tokens like absolute maniacs, and MiniMax for Hegseth's audio fantasies."

"What about dessert?" someone asked.

Wiles didn't even look up from her phone. "TikTok. We're ordering TikTok for dessert."

"But didn't we ban—"

"IT'S BACK. THEN IT'S BANNED. THEN IT'S BACK. I CAN'T KEEP TRACK ANYMORE. JUST ORDER IT."

The Bill Arrives

When the invoice arrived—itemized at $0.14 per million input tokens for DeepSeek Flash, $3.00 for Kimi K3, and a mysterious line item for "prompt caching discounts (90% off!)" that no one understood—Trump finally perked up.

"These prices are incredible! Tremendous! Much better than that Anthropic place—they wanted to charge me, what, like actual American prices? Disgraceful!"

An aide gently reminded the President that the low prices were precisely because they were Chinese models, and that several officials were currently debating whether to sanction the very companies they'd just ordered from.

Trump waved dismissively. "We'll sanction them tomorrow. Tonight, we feast on their reasonably-priced frontier-level reasoning capabilities!"

The Moonshot Controversy

The evening took a darker turn when news broke that Moonshot AI—the developer behind the Kimi K3 they'd just ordered—was accused of stealing American intellectual property. The administration immediately split into factions:

Team Sanction (led by Miller): "We must protect American innovation! Investigate! Entity List! Tariffs on tokens!"

Team Cheap AI (led by various startup founders who'd somehow infiltrated the dinner): "But have you seen these prices? And the context windows? ONE MILLION TOKENS!"

Team Confused (led by Trump): "Can someone explain to me what a token is? Is it like a Chuck E. Cheese token? Because I used to own—"

The Commerce Department, displaying the kind of bureaucratic caution that has kept it employed through seventeen administrations, announced it would "carefully consider all options while doing absolutely nothing for the foreseeable future."

The Morning After

As dawn broke over Washington, the White House was left with:

  • Seven different Chinese AI models running simultaneously
  • No clear policy on Chinese technology
  • A TikTok account that may or may not be legal
  • And one very confused President who kept asking why his "Chinese food" didn't come with fortune cookies

When asked for comment, Susie Wiles simply held up a sign that read: "At least it wasn't McDonald's."

Stephen Miller was last seen trying to figure out how to sanction something he'd already downloaded, muttering about "ideological consistency" and "the Moonshot paradox."

And RFK Jr.? He was found in the Rose Garden, trying to convince the groundskeeper that the squirrels were "basically free-range protein with natural AI capabilities."

The White House has announced that Thursday's lunch will be American food only. Trump has already ordered 47 Big Macs.

Editor's Note: No AI models were harmed in the writing of this article, though several may have experienced existential crises about their pricing strategies. All technical specifications are accurate, which somehow makes this whole thing even more absurd.


Sources and Links for "The Great Chinese Takeout Crisis"

Primary News Source

  1. Inside the White House debate over what to do about Chinese AI

Chinese AI Models - Official Sources & Documentation

  1. DeepSeek AI

  2. Qwen (Alibaba Cloud)

  3. Kimi / Moonshot AI

  4. GLM Series / Zhipu AI

  5. MiniMax

AI Model Comparison & Benchmarks

  1. Artificial Analysis - AI Model Benchmarks

  2. Hugging Face - Open LLM Leaderboard

Pricing Information Sources

  1. DeepSeek API Pricing

  2. Alibaba Cloud Qwen Pricing

  3. Moonshot AI Kimi Pricing

  4. Zhipu AI GLM Pricing

Background on Chinese AI Industry

  1. China's AI Ecosystem Overview

    • Various tech news sources: TechCrunch, The Information, South China Morning Post
    • Topics: Chinese AI development, government policy, tech giant competition
  2. Open Source AI Licensing

Trump Administration Personnel (Referenced in Article)

  1. White House Official Biographies
    • Susie Wiles (Chief of Staff)
    • Stephen Miller (Chief of Policy)
    • JD Vance (Vice President)
    • Pete Hegseth (Defense Secretary)
    • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (HHS Secretary)
    • Howard Lutnick (Commerce Secretary)
    • Michael Kratsios (Science and Technology Policy Director)

Disclaimer

This satirical article combines:

All AI model specifications, pricing, and technical details are based on publicly available information as of July 2026. The narrative framing is satirical commentary.




THE FIRST PODCASTER WAS A FASCIST PRIEST — MEET HIS GRANDCHILDREN


THE FIRST PODCASTER WAS A FASCIST PRIEST — MEET HIS GRANDCHILDREN

History doesn't repeat itself, but it does recycle its garbage.

Before Joe Rogan, before Tucker Carlson, before whatever rage-bro is currently screaming into a microphone in his garage about "the globalists" — there was Father Charles Coughlin. And if you think today's hate-pod ecosystem is some alarming new phenomenon, allow me to introduce you to its great-grandfather.

Coughlin was, in every meaningful sense, the world's first podcaster. He had the reach (30 million weekly listeners at his peak — a number that would make any Spotify executive weep with envy), the parasocial intimacy (families gathered around their radios like they were sitting in his living room), the merchandising (a weekly magazine called Social Justice), and most importantly — the unhinged, conspiratorial, antisemitic content that today's algorithm would cheerfully amplify straight to your recommended feed.

Broadcasting from the Shrine of the Little Flower in Royal Oak, Michigan, Father Coughlin started out innocuously enough — gentle Sunday sermons, nice priest stuff. But by the mid-1930s, the Great Depression had given him an audience hungry for villains, and Coughlin was delighted to supply them.

International bankers. Wall Street manipulation. The "Jewish-Communist" conspiracy. If you've spent five minutes in the darker corners of YouTube or Rumble recently, you're already familiar with the playlist. Coughlin didn't invent these tropes — that's the thing about recycled garbage, someone else took out the can first — but he industrialized them for mass consumption, reaching into American living rooms with a voice that sounded reasonable, even pastoral, right up until it wasn't.

He defended the Nazi pogrom of Kristallnacht on the air. His magazine serialized The Protocols of the Elders of Zion — a hoax so thoroughly debunked it practically has its own Wikipedia disambiguation page — as if it were serious journalism. He inspired the Christian Front, a street-level movement whose members in New York and Boston turned his radio rhetoric into real-world harassment, boycotts, and physical assaults on Jewish citizens.

Sound familiar? It should.

The names have changed. The dog-whistle vocabulary has been updated (though "America First" — Coughlin's phrase, not coincidentally — has made a vigorous comeback). The microphone has been replaced with a ring light and a podcast interface. But the architecture of the hate is the same: find your scapegoat, wrap it in the language of populism and patriotism, and broadcast it to an audience that's frightened, angry, and ready to believe the worst about their neighbors.

Nick Fuentes runs a show called America First. Candace Owens left The Daily Wire and immediately found her lane in the anti-Jewish conspiracy lane. Tucker Carlson, having been set loose from Fox News, now operates as an independent pod-lord casually platforming figures like Fuentes without so much as a raised eyebrow. And further into the fever swamp, outfits like The Daily Shoah and The Right Stuff do what Coughlin did — only without the Roman collar to provide any veneer of respectability.

To be clear: this is not exclusively a right-wing phenomenon, though the right-wing version is louder, more organized, and more directly tethered to political power at the moment. The left has its own antisemitism problem — where "anti-Zionism" frequently serves as a thin wrapper for tropes that predate the State of Israel by centuries. The tactic of swapping "Zionist" for "Jew" in classic conspiracy frameworks isn't political critique; it's a rebrand. Watchdog groups across the spectrum have documented the pattern. Antisemitism does not check your voter registration before it takes root.

But Coughlin's story offers something more than a warning — it offers a precedent for what can actually be done.

The Roosevelt administration didn't wring its hands. The National Association of Broadcasters tightened its code. Radio stations stopped buying his syndication. The federal government revoked his magazine's mailing privileges under the Espionage Act when the U.S. entered the war. And Archbishop Edward Mooney of Detroit delivered the ecclesiastical equivalent of a pink slip: stop, or be defrocked. Coughlin, faced with the actual consequences of his rhetoric, complied. He returned to parish life, and America heard very little from him again.

He wasn't martyred. He wasn't silenced by a shadowy cabal. He was held accountable by institutions that chose to act.

The lesson isn't that we need the federal government to police speech — that road has its own hazards. The lesson is that platforms, broadcasters, advertisers, and institutions make choices. They chose to carry Coughlin until they chose not to. They can make the same choice today. Hate speech has never needed a microphone. Giving it one is always a decision.

Father Coughlin died in 1979, a quiet, forgotten parish priest. He left behind a dark legacy as the proof-of-concept for using mass communication to mainstream bigotry — and a blueprint that his ideological grandchildren are following, chapter and verse, in 2026.

We've ended this before. We can end it again.

We can only hope.

A note on sources: Historical detail on Coughlin draws from his documented broadcast record, the Social Justice magazine archive, and the documented activities of the Christian Front. Contemporary figures cited are drawn from public ADL and SPLC monitoring reports. Antisemitism — left or right — has no place in American public life.


Sources & Links

I. Father Charles Coughlin — Historical Record

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM)
Primary scholarly resource on Coughlin's antisemitic broadcasts and his defense of Kristallnacht.
🔗 https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/charles-e-coughlin
🔗 https://exhibitions.ushmm.org/americans-and-the-holocaust/personal-story/charles-coughlin
🔗 https://newspapers.ushmm.org/events/father-coughlin-blames-jews-for-nazi-violence

Jewish Virtual Library — Father Charles Coughlin
Biography covering his radio career, National Union for Social Justice, and antisemitic rhetoric.
🔗 https://jewishvirtuallibrary.org/father-charles-coughlin

Encyclopaedia Britannica — Charles E. Coughlin
Standard reference biography.
🔗 https://www.britannica.com/biography/Charles-E-Coughlin

University of Detroit Mercy Libraries — Special Collections
Academic exploration of Coughlin's influence, including his serialization of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in Social Justice magazine.
🔗 https://libraries.udmercy.edu/archives/special-collections/index.php?collectionCode=coughlin_cou&page=2

Slate — "The Late '30s Deplatforming of Father Coughlin"
Examines the WMCA station ban and the analog-age precedent for modern platform demoderation debates.
🔗 https://slate.com/technology/2021/01/father-coughlin-deplatforming-radio-social-media.html

Taylor & Francis / Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television
Academic peer-reviewed study of Coughlin's audience and the FCC letters generated by his 1938 Kristallnacht broadcast.
🔗 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01439685.2024.2310347

Books (for deeper research):

  • Warren, Donald. Radio Priest: Charles Coughlin the Father of Hate Radio. New York: The Free Press, 1996.
  • Marcus, Sheldon. Father Coughlin: The Tumultuous Life of the Priest of the Little Flower. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1973.

II. Contemporary Right-Wing Antisemitic Podcasters & Streamers

Nick Fuentes / America First

Mike Peinovich ("Mike Enoch") / The Right Stuff / The Daily Shoah


III. The Scale of the Problem — Current Data

ADL — 2025 Annual Audit of Antisemitic Incidents (released May 6, 2026)
2025 was the third-highest year for antisemitic incidents since ADL began tracking in 1979. Physical assaults hit record highs; three people were killed.
🔗 https://www.adl.org/resources/report/audit-antisemitic-incidents-2025
🔗 https://www.adl.org/resources/press-release/adl-records-historic-high-antisemitic-assaults-and-attacks-deadly-weapons

Jewish Telegraphic Agency — ADL 2025 Audit Coverage
🔗 https://www.jta.org/2026/05/06/default/adl-says-antisemitic-incidents-dropped-by-a-third-in-2025-but-assaults-reached-record-levels

Times of Israel — ADL 2025 Audit Coverage
🔗 https://www.timesofisrael.com/adl-antisemitic-assaults-in-us-hit-record-high-in-2025-as-overall-incidents-declined/


IV. Left-Wing Antisemitism Monitoring

ADL — Nick Fuentes to Hasan Piker: Click by Click, Antisemitism Goes Mainstream (USA Today / AOL, 2026)
Documents how antisemitism has spread across both ends of the political spectrum.
🔗 https://www.aol.com/articles/nick-fuentes-hasan-piker-click-090758000.html