Latest News and Comment from Education

Wednesday, May 21, 2025

WE DON'T DO KINGS: NATIONWIDE PROTESTS TO RAIN ON TRUMP'S $45M BIRTHDAY MILITARY PARADE #NoKingsDay #DefendDemocracy #AmericaStrong

 

WE DON'T DO KINGS

NATIONWIDE PROTESTS TO RAIN ON TRUMP'S $45M BIRTHDAY MILITARY PARADE


It’s a tale as old as time: someone tries to throw themselves a lavish, self-indulgent birthday party, and all the neighbors show up to loudly object. Except in this case, the birthday boy is Donald Trump, the party costs a jaw-dropping $45 million in taxpayer dollars, and the neighbors include thousands of activists nationwide shouting, “No thrones, no crowns, no kings!” Welcome to the "No Kings Day" Nationwide Day of Defiance.

Set your calendars for June 14, 2025—a date that coincidentally aligns with Flag Day, the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, and Trump’s 79th birthday. While Trump plans to celebrate with tanks rolling down the streets of Washington, D.C., flyovers that could rival a Marvel movie climax, and a price tag that could make Scrooge McDuck blush, pro-democracy activists are gearing up for a different kind of spectacle. One that involves art, peaceful protests, and a collective rejection of authoritarian vibes.

A Parade Fit for… Well, Not a Democracy

Let’s unpack this parade for a moment. Picture it: 6,600 soldiers marching in formation, 150 military vehicles rumbling across D.C., and enough flyovers to make anyone within earshot rethink their stance on noise-canceling headphones. Trump has defended this extravaganza as a "patriotic celebration," emphasizing the strength of America’s military might. But critics—and there are many—see something else entirely: an authoritarian flex straight out of the dictator playbook.

“This isn’t patriotism,” said one organizer. “This is a $45 million ego trip paid for by taxpayers. Tanks in the streets? Really? What’s next? A golden throne at the Lincoln Memorial?”

While Trump may view this as his personal crowning moment (pun intended), opposition groups have a different idea. Enter the "No Kings" coalition—a diverse collection of advocacy groups, activists, and everyday citizens who are saying "thanks, but no tanks." Their mission? To remind everyone that democracy doesn’t come with parades of power; it comes with accountability, equity, and grassroots action.

The "No Kings" Movement: A Royal Pain for Authoritarians

The "No Kings" protests are shaping up to be a nationwide extravaganza of their own. Over 100 events are planned across the country, from marches and rallies to artistic performances that celebrate democracy and denounce militarism. Think less "Top Gun" and more "Hamilton meets democracy flash mob."

Organized by groups like Indivisible, Refuse Fascism, and Black Voters Matter, the movement is grounded in nonviolence and creativity. Participants are encouraged to de-escalate conflicts (because nothing ruins a protest like an argument over who brought the wrong signs) and leave the weapons at home. After all, nothing says “we’re better than this” like peaceful resistance.

One organizer summed it up perfectly: “We don’t need tanks or flyovers to show strength. True power comes from people standing together for justice, equality, and democracy. Also, let’s be honest—$45 million could fix a lot of potholes.”

Why All the Fuss?

Now, you might be thinking: Why all this hullabaloo over a parade? Isn’t it just a bit of pomp and circumstance? Well, not quite.

Critics argue that this isn’t just about a one-off event—it’s about what the parade represents. To them, it’s a tone-deaf display of dominance at a time when many Americans are struggling with issues like inflation, healthcare costs, and systemic inequality. It’s also seen as part of a broader pattern of authoritarian behavior from Trump’s administration, which has faced accusations of corruption, civil rights abuses, and policies that disproportionately harm vulnerable communities.

And then there’s the price tag. At $45 million, this parade isn’t just expensive—it’s downright extravagant. For context, that’s enough money to provide free school lunches for over 5 million kids or fund nearly 900 teachers’ salaries for a year. Instead, it’s being spent on tanks that will likely tear up D.C.’s streets faster than you can say “infrastructure repair.”

Even some veterans and military officials have voiced concerns about the parade. After all, isn’t the military supposed to serve the people—not act as props in a political theater production?

The Musk Factor

Adding fuel to the fire is the inclusion of Elon Musk in this drama. Critics have accused both Trump and Musk of promoting policies that undermine federal programs while prioritizing corporate interests. Whether it’s union-busting or tax breaks for billionaires, many see their actions as emblematic of a broader threat to democracy and social welfare.

“Trump and Musk are like the Batman and Robin of corporate greed,” one protester quipped. “Except instead of fighting crime, they’re fighting workers’ rights.”

A Battle of Narratives

As the big day approaches, both sides are ramping up their messaging. Supporters of the parade argue that it’s a much-needed celebration of American strength and resilience. Opponents counter that true patriotism isn’t about flashy displays—it’s about ensuring dignity and justice for all citizens.

Social media has become a battleground for these narratives, with hashtags like #NoKingsDay and #DefendDemocracy trending alongside pro-parade slogans like #AmericaStrong (and the occasional meme featuring Trump riding a tank à la Dr. Strangelove).

Meanwhile, law enforcement in D.C. is bracing for what promises to be a massive turnout on both sides. With thousands expected to attend both the parade and the protests, security will be tighter than Trump’s grip on his Twitter account (or whatever platform he’s using these days).

What Comes Next?

The "No Kings" protests aren’t just about June 14—they’re part of a larger movement to resist authoritarianism and promote inclusive democracy. Advocacy groups like Indivisible have been at the forefront of this fight since 2016, organizing campaigns to hold leaders accountable and empower grassroots activism.

As one protester put it: “This isn’t just about Trump or one parade. It’s about what kind of country we want to be. Do we want tanks in our streets or teachers in our classrooms? Do we want leaders who serve themselves or leaders who serve us?”

So whether you’re marching in D.C., attending a rally in your hometown, or simply tweeting your support from the comfort of your couch, one thing is clear: June 14 is shaping up to be more than just another day on the calendar. It’s a reminder that in a democracy, power doesn’t come from parades or pageantry—it comes from people.

As for Trump? Well, let’s just say he might want to keep those birthday candles handy. He’ll need something to light his way when he realizes not everyone is cheering for his parade.

Final Thought

In America, we don’t do kings—or so the saying goes. But if there’s one thing we do exceptionally well, it’s standing up for our values when they’re under threat. So here’s to June 14: a day for flags, freedom, and reminding everyone that democracy doesn’t roll on tank treads—it marches on the will of the people.

Indivisible And Partners Announce ‘NO KINGS’ Nationwide Day of Defiance on Flag Day, During Trump’s Birthday Parade | Indivisible https://indivisible.org/statements/indivisible-and-partners-announce-no-kings-nationwide-day-defiance-flag-day-during 

Volunteer Opportunities, Events, and Petitions Near Me · No Kings on Mobilize https://www.mobilize.us/nokings/

Volunteer Opportunities, Events, and Petitions Near Me · AFT on Mobilize https://www.mobilize.us/aft/?org_ids=42198 

'We Don't Do Kings': Mass Protests Planned to Counter Trump's Birthday Military Parade | Common Dreams https://www.commondreams.org/news/no-kings-day-protest 

Nationwide 'No Kings' Protest Planned for Parade on Trump's Birthday - Newsweek https://www.newsweek.com/no-kings-protest-donald-trump-birthday-parade-2068443 

Schools Matter: National Day of Defiance June 14: No Kings Day http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2025/05/national-day-of-defiance-june-14-no.html 




Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights: A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts! 5-21-25

 

Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
5-20-25

Wall Street Journal: Trump Tax Plan Will Not Cut the Deficit https://dianeravitch.net/2025/05/20/wall-street-journal-trump-tax-plan-will-not-cut-the-deficit/ via @dianeravitch 

Wall Street Journal: Trump Tax Plan Will Not Cut the Deficit By dianeravitch May 20, 2025 // 4 Richard Rubin of The Wall Street Journal politely explains the lie behind Trump’s “big beautiful budget plan” : it will not cut the deficit. It will increase it. WASHINGTON—House Republicans pushed President Trump’s “big, beautiful” tax-and-spending bill past a key hurdle late Sunday night, but the last-minute grappling has them colliding with a stark reality: The plan won’t reduce federal budget deficits and would make America’s fiscal hole deeper. The bill could reach the House floor this week, and it is a tenuous balance between the party’s tax-cut wing and factions seeking

### Key Points

- Trump’s proposed tax-and-spending plan, supported by House Republicans, is criticized for increasing the federal deficit rather than reducing it. 

- The bill faces internal Republican division, with some members advocating for larger spending cuts and others demanding more tax breaks. 

- Moody’s Ratings highlights concerns about the U.S.’s rising debt, exacerbated by the tax cuts, which could lead to further fiscal instability. 

- Critics argue that the tax cuts disproportionately benefit the wealthy while harming vulnerable populations through reduced services. 

- Experts suggest that addressing the deficit would require significant reforms, such as cutting military spending, Medicare, Social Security, or raising taxes on the middle class. 

Why Trump Hates PBS: The Definitive Explanation https://dianeravitch.net/2025/05/20/why-trump-hates-pbs-the-definitive-explanation/ via @dianeravitch 

Why Trump Hates PBS: The Definitive Explanation

### Key Points

- Trump signed an executive order to defund PBS and NPR, which provide valuable news and educational content. 

- Trump's disdain for PBS stems from a 1988 Sesame Street episode where he was satirized as "Ronald Grump," a greedy developer. 

- Commenters suggest Trump's actions often stem from personal slights, highlighting his thin-skinned and vindictive nature. 

Leonie Haimson: How States Can Inspire One Another to Fight for Successful Policies https://dianeravitch.net/2025/05/20/leonie-haimson-how-states-can-inspire-one-another-to-fight-for-successful-policies/ via @dianeravitch 

Leonie Haimson, a leading advocate for class size reduction and executive director of Class Size Matters, highlights the importance of smaller class sizes in improving educational outcomes. Her advocacy inspired Michigan's State Board of Education to pass a resolution calling for class size caps, modeled after New York City's law. The resolution aims to improve literacy rates and overall education quality by reducing student-to-teacher ratios in classrooms, with proposed limits to be implemented by the 2030-31 school year.

### Key Points

- Leonie Haimson’s advocacy for smaller class sizes has influenced education reform policies, including Michigan's recent resolution for class size limits. 

- Michigan’s State Board of Education approved a resolution to cap class sizes at 20 students in early grades to address literacy struggles and improve outcomes. 

- The resolution was inspired by New York City’s law and research, emphasizing the positive impact of reduced class sizes on student performance and teacher effectiveness. 

- Implementation challenges, including funding, staffing, and space, remain, but the resolution marks a significant step towards education reform. 



Big Education Ape: BLUESKY: THE RISING STAR THAT IS POOPING ON X'S PARADE https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/05/bluesky-rising-star-that-is-pooping-on.html 

Big Education Ape’s article highlights the rise of Bluesky as a decentralized, user-centric social media platform that is gaining traction amidst dissatisfaction with Elon Musk’s rebranding of Twitter into "X." Bluesky prioritizes user control, community-driven moderation, and innovative features, offering an alternative to traditional platforms. Its growth is fueled by disillusionment with Musk's decisions and a demand for healthier online spaces.

### Key Points
- Bluesky emerged as a decentralized platform from a Twitter project in 2019 and now operates independently, offering user control over data and identities. 
- The platform emphasizes customizable communities, balanced moderation, and ad-free experiences, attracting over 34 million users. 
- Bluesky’s success is linked to its AT Protocol, fostering interoperability and innovation, alongside alternatives like Skylight for short-form video content. 
- Elon Musk’s controversial management of "X" has driven users to Bluesky, which is seen as a healthier, more user-friendly alternative. 
- Bluesky’s future plans include customizable feeds and enhanced verification, aiming to become a leading social media platform. 

Big Education Ape: META, MONOPOLIES AND THE MISADVENTURES OF THE MODERN PUBLIC SQUARE https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2025/05/meta-monopolies-and-misadventures-of.html 

META, MONOPOLIES AND THE MISADVENTURES OF THE MODERN PUBLIC SQUARE explores Meta's dominance in the social media landscape and its ongoing antitrust trial with the FTC. The article critiques Meta's monopolistic behavior, algorithmic influence, and the broader implications for democracy and public discourse in the digital age.

### Key Points
- Meta, formerly Facebook, faces FTC allegations of monopolistic practices through acquisitions like Instagram and WhatsApp. 
- The FTC argues that Meta’s dominance stifles competition, while Meta defends itself by citing competitors like TikTok and YouTube. 
- Meta’s algorithms prioritize engagement, creating echo chambers and influencing public discourse, raising concerns about transparency and accountability. 
- Critics debate whether social media platforms should be regulated as public utilities to ensure fairness and accessibility. 
- The trial’s outcome could reshape the digital landscape, either breaking up Meta or maintaining its dominance. 


Elon Musk and the Billionaire’s Ketamine Monopoly Test: A Satirical Take on Wealth, Politics, and Public Perception

### Key Points
- Elon Musk’s political involvement during the 2024 election cycle, spending over $290 million to support Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans, resulted in failed outcomes and backlash. 
- His political endorsements alienated Tesla customers and led to a decline in Twitter (X) users, hurting his reputation and businesses. 
- After facing public criticism and declining stock values, Musk announced at the Qatar Economic Forum that he would reduce his political involvement and refocus on running his companies. 
- Musk faces regulatory challenges in South Africa over his Starlink satellite internet service, with allegations of discriminatory policies and conflicts of interest. 
- The article highlights the broader lesson that wealth does not guarantee political acumen and criticizes Musk’s public missteps and overexposure.  




The Gift That Never Stops Giving--Being a Teacher* https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2025/05/20/the-gift-that-never-stops-giving-being-a-teacher-2/ via @CubanLarry 

Larry Cuban reflects on the enduring impact and rewards of being a teacher, emphasizing the deep, lasting bonds formed with students over decades. He highlights the importance of retaining experienced teachers to create meaningful connections that cannot be captured by test scores or short-term teaching stints. Cuban advocates for policies that support teacher growth, retention, and livable salaries to ensure these relationships thrive and positively influence students' lives.

### Key Points

- Teaching provides unspoken, long-term rewards as former students often stay in touch, sharing memories and expressing gratitude. 

- Former students attribute significant influence to their teachers, even if teachers don't recall specific moments, showcasing the immeasurable impact of teaching. 

- Cuban critiques "turnstile teaching," where short-term teachers fail to form lasting bonds, advocating for retaining veteran teachers who build strong relationships over time. 

- Policies supporting teacher retention, professional growth, and adequate pay are essential to fostering these impactful teacher-student connections. 



CURMUDGUCATION: 20 Rules for Life (2025 edition) https://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2025/05/20-rules-for-life-2025-edition.html 

### Summary  

The article presents "20 Rules for Life (2025 edition)" written by Peter Greene, reflecting his personal philosophy and insights gained over the years. These rules emphasize kindness, honesty, self-improvement, understanding, gratitude, and commitment, among other values. The list is revisited annually, showing how certain principles grow in importance based on societal changes. Greene also critiques modern tendencies like untruthfulness, superficiality, and the misuse of technology, while advocating for meaningful connections and purposeful living.  

### Key Points  

- "Don't be a dick" emphasizes kindness and avoiding deliberate harm.   

- Strive to "Do better" every day, regardless of past mistakes.   

- "Tell the truth" and avoid using words as tools for manipulation or lies.   

- Seek to understand rather than seeking comfort or confirmation of beliefs.   

- "Listen and pay attention" to truly hear and see others, valuing all moments.   

- Be grateful for life's blessings, acknowledging privilege and grace.   

- Focus on the 5% of life that truly matters, avoiding trivial distractions.   

- "Mind your own business" and avoid unnecessary opinions on matters you don't understand.   

- Take care of people around you, making a positive difference daily.   

- Commit fully to actions and renew commitment regularly.   

- "Shut up and do the work" instead of seeking validation for efforts.   

- Assume good intent in others rather than labeling them as evil or stupid.   

- Avoid wasting time on people who are not serious or principled.   

- Always remember the point or goal, and avoid being misled by expectations.   

- Acknowledge that people are complex and cannot be categorized easily.   

- Create something meaningful, such as art or music.   

- Show up fully in relationships and answer life's calls when required.   

- Refine your core identity, separating it from external circumstances.   

- Treat others well, irrespective of their behavior, as it reflects your character. 



"Big Beautiful Bill" in Congress Hurts Poor Children and Establishes New Federal School Vouchers https://janresseger.wordpress.com/2025/05/20/big-beautiful-bill-in-congress-hurts-poor-children-and-establishes-new-federal-school-vouchers/ via @janresseger

Congress is advancing a reconciliation bill termed the "big, beautiful bill," which primarily extends tax cuts favoring the wealthy and corporations while slashing funding for critical programs that support vulnerable families and children. The bill includes severe cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, TANF, and the Social Services Block Grant, jeopardizing healthcare, food security, and essential services for millions of children. It also proposes a federal school voucher program that primarily benefits the wealthy as a tax shelter, undermining public education and religious freedom. While the bill increases the Child Tax Credit, it excludes the poorest families from fully benefiting. Critics argue the legislation prioritizes tax breaks for the affluent at the expense of the nation's most vulnerable populations.

### Key Points

- Congress's reconciliation bill extends tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations while cutting programs for vulnerable families. 

- Major cuts to Medicaid, SNAP, TANF, and the Social Services Block Grant will harm millions of children and families. 

- The Child Tax Credit increase excludes the poorest families, favoring higher-income groups. 

- A federal school voucher program in the bill acts as a tax shelter for wealthy donors, undermining public schools and religious freedom. 

- Critics argue the bill prioritizes the wealthy over the needs of children and families. 



Teacher Tom: What We are Saying is Radical https://teachertomsblog.blogspot.com/2025/05/what-we-are-saying-is-radical.html 

Teacher Tom discusses the radical idea of treating children as fully formed individuals deserving of respect, challenging conventional approaches to parenting and education. He emphasizes trusting children, allowing them autonomy, and un-learning outdated methods of control and coercion. Through progressive, play-based education, he advocates for creating environments where children think for themselves and thrive naturally.

### Key Points

- The radical idea that children are fully formed individuals deserving respect and trust. 

- Critique of traditional, controlling approaches to parenting and education. 

- Importance of fostering children's autonomy through play-based learning. 

- The need to un-learn modern parenting and schooling norms to better support children's growth. 

- Promotion of a course aimed at improving communication with children to foster independence and cooperation. 



Buyer's Remorse https://open.substack.com/pub/educationwars/p/buyers-remorse?r=kja7f&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false 

The article discusses the contentious expansion of school voucher programs across several U.S. states and their financial and social implications. While proponents celebrate these programs as "education freedom," critics highlight their detrimental effects on public education funding and the broader societal impacts, including tax cuts for the wealthy and increased costs for taxpayers. The backlash against these programs is growing as states grapple with economic challenges and the consequences of diverting funds from public schools to private institutions.

### Key Points

- The expansion of school voucher programs in states like Texas, Florida, and New Hampshire has led to significant financial strain on public education systems. 

- Voucher programs often benefit wealthy families whose children were already in private schools, creating a dual education system funded by taxpayers. 

- States like Louisiana and Missouri are beginning to push back against escalating voucher costs, prioritizing public school funding instead. 

- Economic downturns and tax cuts for the wealthy exacerbate budget issues, with states struggling to fund public education while supporting voucher programs. 

- Activist groups and local communities, particularly in Florida, are mobilizing to defend public education, signaling a potential backlash against these policies. 



Seattle Schools Community Forum: Seattle Schools in the News https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2025/05/seattle-schools-in-news_20.html?spref=tw 

Seattle Schools Community Forum discusses recent issues in Seattle Public Schools, including communication failures about free school meals, safety measures at Washington Middle School, and traffic camera expansions near schools. Other topics include nepotism concerns within the district and debates over potential school closures.

### Key Points

- Seattle Public Schools failed to notify families about free meal eligibility at certain schools, causing confusion and unnecessary payments. 

- Washington Middle School implemented a temporary street closure for student safety, with discussions ongoing about making it permanent. 

- Seattle plans to expand traffic cameras near schools to improve safety, though Washington Middle School is not included in this initiative. 

- Allegations of nepotism in Seattle Public Schools highlight concerns about promotions based on personal connections rather than merit. 

- Discussions about potential school closures in the district raise questions about financial savings and resource allocation. 



Respect Is Earned: A Letter to My Daughter (and every student) on Fear, Failure, and Leadership – Cloaking Inequity https://cloakinginequity.com/2025/05/20/respect-is-earned-a-letter-to-my-daughter-and-every-student-on-fear-failure-and-leadership/ 

A heartfelt letter from Dr. Julian Vasquez Heilig to his daughter, offering life advice on overcoming fear, failure, and rejection while embracing leadership, discipline, and purpose. Drawing inspiration from Deshauna Barber’s journey, it emphasizes perseverance, preparation, integrity, and using failure as a stepping stone to success.

### Key Points

- Success requires courage, persistence, and the ability to embrace failure as a learning opportunity. 

- Leadership is built on discipline, purpose, and integrity, rather than external validation. 

- Deshauna Barber’s story exemplifies resilience, hard work, and using rejection as motivation to improve. 

- Discipline and preparation are key to achieving excellence and long-term success. 

- Failure should be seen as a teacher and an opportunity to grow stronger. 

- Purpose-driven leadership uplifts others and creates meaningful change. 



On the inadequacies of the city’s planning for class size especially as regards space | Class Size Matters  | A clearinghouse for information on class size & the proven benefits of smaller classes https://classsizematters.org/on-the-inadequacies-of-the-citys-planning-for-class-size-especially-as-regards-space/ 

### Main Points

- NYC Council Finance and Education Committees held a hearing on the education budget and five-year capital plan, focusing on class size issues. 

- Advocacy for NYC to implement a multi-year strategy to reduce class sizes as mandated by law, with a petition and survey available for public participation. 

- The "Talk out of School" radio show and podcast discusses public school issues in NYC and beyond, featuring interviews with key figures. 

- The annual Skinny Award dinner honored Rep. Jamaal Bowman for his contributions to public education. 

- A new law passed in June 2022 requires NYC schools to phase in smaller classes across all grades. 

- Advocacy for sufficient space in schools to accommodate smaller classes, urging public action and Council Member involvement. 



Reddit Unknowingly Becomes Guinea Pig for AI Research | deutsch29: Mercedes Schneider's Blog https://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2025/05/20/reddit-unknowingly-becomes-guinea-pig-for-ai-research/ 

Reddit Unknowingly Becomes Guinea Pig for AI Research

### Key Points

- Researchers from the University of Zurich conducted an AI-driven persuasion experiment on Reddit’s "ChangeMyView" subreddit without user consent, using AI-powered accounts to interact with users. 

- The study aimed to test the persuasiveness of AI compared to human arguments, with bots posting over 1,000 comments during a four-month period. 

- Reddit users were outraged upon discovering the experiment, citing ethical violations and deception, as the bots often impersonated specific personas. 

- The researchers initially defended their methods but later apologized, halted the study, and promised not to publish final results. 

- The experiment highlighted the potential misuse of AI for manipulation, such as swaying public opinion or influencing elections. It also demonstrated the difficulty of distinguishing AI-generated content from human responses. 


Yesterday’s Gems, Today’s Insights
A Roundup of the Web’s Finest Blog Posts!
5-18-25
   

The article is a compilation of educational, political, and societal issues, presenting various controversies, legal battles, reforms, and systemic challenges. It discusses topics such as public education policies, civil rights, healthcare, religious charter schools, and the impact of political decisions on marginalized communities. Key themes include the erosion of democratic protections, privatization of education, and the consequences of authoritarian tendencies.  

### Key Points  

- The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Trump’s immigration policies, affirming due process for all individuals in the U.S., regardless of citizenship.   

- Georgia's abortion law mandates keeping a brain-dead pregnant woman alive, raising ethical and financial concerns.   

- Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu faces criticism for war crimes in Gaza, while Trump avoids addressing the humanitarian crisis.   

- Florida courts ruled against DeSantis’ attempt to ban drag shows, emphasizing free speech rights and opposing political censorship.   

- The Network for Public Education reports $1 billion wasted on failed charter schools, raising concerns about privatization and public funding misuse.   

- Religious charter schools, like St. Isidore Catholic School, challenge the separation of church and state by seeking public funding.   

- Cyberbullying is a significant trauma source for adolescents, emphasizing the need for trauma-informed approaches in schools.   

- Donald Trump secured personal business deals in the Middle East but ignored humanitarian crises, such as the Gaza blockade.   

- Trump’s DOJ stated it could selectively obey court orders, undermining the rule of law and constitutional checks.   

- Boys outperform girls in STEM post-COVID, reversing prior gender equity gains.   

- Walmart raises prices due to Trump-era tariffs, highlighting economic struggles tied to billionaire tax cuts.   

- The Seattle School Board’s superintendent search emphasizes inclusivity, transparency, and community engagement.   

- The Supreme Court is deliberating on a case involving religious charter schools, which could significantly alter the future of public education.   

- A transportation safety event for children with disabilities will be held, offering sensory-friendly activities and resources for families.   

- The Heritage Foundation's Project Esther is criticized for targeting progressive activists and left-wing critics of Israel while ignoring far-right antisemitism.   

- Malcolm X's 100th birthday is celebrated, emphasizing his legacy and relevance in contemporary discussions.   

- College course shutouts negatively impact students, particularly women, reducing their likelihood of pursuing STEM and affecting long-term outcomes.   

- The wage premium for attending college has halved for lower-income Americans since 1960, highlighting growing inequality in higher education.   

- Media often oversimplifies or distorts educational narratives, particularly around charter school successes, which are often tied to socioeconomic factors.   

- The Trump administration’s media tactics, described as "narrative warfare," aim to distract from critical policy issues and consolidate power.   

- The Trump administration’s economic policies, including tax cuts for the wealthy and high tariffs, have led to economic uncertainty and rising prices.   

- Dr. Julian Vasquez Heilig critiques the Turning Point USA Professor Watchlist as an attempt to suppress academic freedom, urging resistance.   

- The wrongful conviction of Leo Schofield highlights judicial and journalistic misconduct, with calls for a new trial and accountability.   

- Teacher Tom advocates for fostering children's creativity and independence by reducing adult-imposed restrictions and focusing on open-ended communication. 





Tuesday, May 20, 2025

META, MONOPOLIES AND THE MISADVENTURES OF THE MODERN PUBLIC SQUARE

 
META, MONOPOLIES AND THE MISADVENTURES OF THE MODERN PUBLIC SQUARE

Meta. The company formerly known as Facebook, which rebranded itself with a name that sounds like a yoga studio but acts more like a corporate empire. If you’ve been following the drama, you know that Meta has been accused of hoarding the digital public square like a dragon guarding its treasure. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken them to court, alleging monopolistic behavior, and the trial is shaping up to be a showdown of epic proportions. Think "Game of Thrones," but with fewer dragons and more lawyers.

Let’s break this down. Meta owns Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp—three platforms you probably use daily to procrastinate, argue with strangers, or share pictures of your dog. The FTC claims that by acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp, Meta effectively squashed its competition and turned the social media landscape into its personal monopoly playground. Meta, of course, denies these allegations, insisting that they face plenty of competition from TikTok, YouTube, LinkedIn, and perhaps your grandmother’s knitting circle on Pinterest.

But here’s the thing: calling TikTok or YouTube "competition" is a bit like saying a cat competes with a goldfish because they both exist in your house. Sure, they’re both there, but they serve wildly different purposes. TikTok is where teenagers go to learn dances they’ll regret in five years. YouTube is where you can find tutorials on anything from fixing your sink to building a rocket (seriously—look it up). And LinkedIn? Well, it’s where people pretend to be professional while secretly hoping their posts go viral. Meanwhile, Meta’s platforms dominate the market for personal social networking, where everyone from your best friend to your weird uncle shares their unsolicited opinions.

The Public Square Problem

Meta likes to position itself as the digital public square—a place where people can gather, share ideas, and engage in democratic dialogue. But let’s be real: it’s more like a digital shopping mall where free speech comes with an algorithmic price tag. The company’s algorithms decide what you see and what you don’t, creating echo chambers that reinforce your existing beliefs. If you think the earth is flat, guess what? Meta will show you more flat-earth content until you’re convinced NASA is part of the conspiracy.

And let’s not forget the censorship issue. Meta has the power to deplatform users or suppress certain viewpoints, which is both a blessing and a curse. On one hand, nobody wants their feed flooded with hate speech or misinformation. On the other hand, who gets to decide what qualifies as hate speech or misinformation? It’s like letting one person control the playlist at a party—they might think they’re doing everyone a favor by playing ABBA on repeat, but not everyone wants to dance to "Dancing Queen" for three hours straight.

Algorithms: The Invisible Puppeteers

Meta’s algorithms are the secret sauce behind its success—and its controversies. These algorithms are designed to keep you scrolling by showing you content that aligns with your interests (or at least what Meta thinks your interests are). The result? You spend more time on their platforms, see more ads, and make Meta more money. It’s a brilliant business model but a questionable one for democracy.

The problem is that these algorithms prioritize engagement over everything else. If outrage gets clicks, you’ll see more content designed to make you angry. If cute cat videos keep you scrolling, prepare for an endless parade of felines. It’s like being trapped in a funhouse where every mirror reflects your worst impulses—or your love of cats.

And because these algorithms are proprietary and secretive, there’s no way to know exactly how they work. It’s like trying to solve a mystery where the detective refuses to share their clues. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to hold Meta accountable for its role in shaping public discourse.

Monopoly or Misunderstanding?

The FTC’s case against Meta hinges on whether the company is a monopoly in the "personal social networking" market. If they win, Meta could be forced to divest from Instagram and WhatsApp, essentially breaking up the empire. This could lead to a more competitive social media landscape—or it could create chaos as users navigate multiple platforms that no longer integrate seamlessly.

Meta argues that breaking up the company would hurt consumers by disrupting their services. It’s a classic "if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it" defense. But critics argue that the system *is* broken—it’s just broken in Meta’s favor. By owning multiple platforms, Meta can cross-promote its services and collect data across all of them, giving it an unparalleled advantage over competitors.

The Bigger Picture

The debate over Meta is part of a larger conversation about the role of Big Tech in our lives. Social media platforms have become essential tools for communication, activism, and even governance. But they’re also private companies with their own agendas—and those agendas don’t always align with the public good.

Take Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, for example. This law shields tech companies from liability for user-generated content while allowing them to moderate that content as they see fit. It’s the legal equivalent of having your cake and eating it too. Critics argue that Section 230 gives companies like Meta too much power without enough accountability.

Then there’s the question of whether social media platforms should be treated as public utilities or common carriers. If these platforms are essential for modern communication, should they be regulated to ensure fairness and accessibility? Or would that stifle innovation and create new problems?

What’s Next?

The trial against Meta is ongoing, and it could take years before we see a resolution. In the meantime, the company will continue to operate as usual—dominating the market, tweaking its algorithms, and making Mark Zuckerberg even richer.

But this isn’t just about Meta; it’s about the future of the internet and how we navigate our digital lives. Do we want an online world controlled by a few mega-corporations? Or do we want a more open and competitive landscape where diverse voices can thrive?

One thing is clear: the digital public square isn’t going away anytime soon. Whether it remains a mall owned by Meta or evolves into something more democratic depends on how we address these challenges—and whether we’re willing to confront the giants of Big Tech.

In the meantime, enjoy your memes and cat videos—but maybe think twice before liking that post about flat-earth theories. After all, you never know what the algorithm will serve up next.


Is Meta a Monopoly? What to Know About the FTC's Antitrust Case - CNET https://www.cnet.com/news/social-media/is-meta-a-monopoly-what-to-know-about-the-ftcs-antitrust-case/ 

Meta and the FTC face off in court over monopoly claims - OPB https://www.opb.org/article/2025/04/14/meta-and-the-ftc-face-off-in-court-over-monopoly-claims/ 

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg takes the stand in historic antitrust trial | AP News https://apnews.com/article/meta-ftc-antitrust-instagram-whatsapp-facebook-f602a09e86c9eb4538949572f72e8380 


BLUESKY: THE RISING STAR THAT IS POOPING ON X'S PARADE

 

In the ever-dramatic saga of social media platforms, one plucky underdog is soaring above the wreckage of Elon Musk's Twitter rebrand, "X." Enter Bluesky—a decentralized, user-centric platform that has seemingly emerged as the hero we didn’t know we needed but now can’t stop rooting for. If Twitter is the grumpy old man yelling at kids to get off his lawn, Bluesky is the cool neighbor hosting a backyard barbecue with free vegan options and an open mic for poetry slams. And boy, is it catching on.

The Origin Story: From Twitter’s Basement to the Big Leagues

Bluesky was born as an experimental project in 2019 under the Twitter umbrella, back when Jack Dorsey was still sporting his Gandalf beard and dreaming of a decentralized internet. Fast forward to today, Twitter has morphed into "X," a dystopian playground of algorithmic chaos and questionable leadership, while Bluesky has spun off into its own independent platform. Think of it as the rebellious teenager who left home to start a punk band—and now has a record deal.

At the helm of Bluesky is CEO Jay Graber, who has taken Dorsey’s initial vision and turned it into something truly revolutionary. Built on the open-source AT Protocol, Bluesky is all about decentralization, interoperability, and giving users control over their online identities and data. Translation: it’s like a social media buffet where you get to pick what you want without being force-fed ads for protein powder or conspiracy theories.

What’s the Deal With Bluesky?

Bluesky’s rapid growth—now boasting over 34 million users—proves that people are tired of the same old social media nonsense. The platform offers customizable communities, balanced free speech (no fascists allowed, thank you very much), and features like verification that don’t require selling your soul—or your data—to the highest bidder.

Unlike "X," which feels like a chaotic blend of doomscrolling and digital gladiator fights, Bluesky is more like a well-organized town hall meeting where everyone gets a say. Want to join a community focused on cat memes? Go for it. Prefer a space dedicated to deep philosophical debates? Have at it. The platform’s community-driven moderation means you can curate your experience without worrying about trolls or bots ruining your day.

And let’s not forget Skylight, Bluesky’s TikTok-esque cousin that’s built on the same AT Protocol. Launched in record time (just 10 weeks!), Skylight offers short-form video content with features like duets and playlists. It’s like TikTok but without the looming fear of a government ban or an algorithm that thinks you really need to see another dance challenge.

Elon Musk: The Antihero of This Tale

Of course, no story about Bluesky would be complete without mentioning its accidental PR agent, Elon Musk. Since taking over Twitter and rebranding it as "X," Musk has made one questionable decision after another. From mass layoffs to algorithmic throttling of links, his reign has been less "visionary genius" and more "The Grinch Who Stole Twitter."

Users have flocked to Bluesky in droves, disillusioned by Musk’s antics and desperate for a healthier digital environment. It’s as if Musk is playing a game of “how many people can I alienate before breakfast” while Bluesky quietly builds a better mousetrap.

Why Bluesky Works (And Why It’s Winning)

Bluesky’s success lies in its commitment to user empowerment and innovation. The platform’s open ecosystem encourages developers to experiment and create new apps, fostering a sense of collaboration that’s rare in today’s competitive tech landscape. Whether it’s Skylight or other ATProto-based apps, users can move seamlessly between platforms while retaining their followers and content. It’s like having a digital passport that actually works—take that, TSA!

Monetization is another area where Bluesky shines. Instead of bombarding users with ads or selling their data to shady third parties, the platform is exploring subscriptions and developer services. Imagine paying for something you actually want instead of being subjected to yet another ad for that weird gadget you Googled once at 2 AM.

And then there’s the moderation system. Unlike "X," which seems to thrive on chaos, Bluesky strikes a balance between decentralization and necessary rules. Users can choose their moderation preferences or even create separate spaces with different guidelines. It’s like having a bouncer at your party who knows exactly when to kick out the guy trying to start a fight over pineapple pizza.

The Future Looks Bright (And Blue)

As Bluesky continues to grow, its potential seems limitless. The platform is already attracting creators, celebrities, and organizations looking for better engagement and less toxicity. With plans to introduce new features like customizable feeds and additional verification options, Bluesky is positioning itself as the social media equivalent of a five-star resort—luxurious but accessible.

Meanwhile, "X" feels more like a crumbling amusement park where the rides are broken, and the popcorn machine is on fire. Musk might have rebranded Twitter as "X," but Bluesky is proving that sometimes sticking with your original name—and your original values—is the smarter move.

In Conclusion: The Sky’s the Limit

Bluesky isn’t just another social media platform; it’s a movement. In an era where online spaces feel increasingly hostile and algorithm-driven, Bluesky offers a breath of fresh air. It’s a place where users can connect meaningfully, share ideas freely (but respectfully), and maybe even have a little fun along the way.

So if you’re tired of doomscrolling through "X" or dodging political rants on Facebook, give Bluesky a try. Who knows? You might just find yourself part of the next big thing in social media—or at least enjoying some really great cat memes.


Bluesky Is Plotting a Total Takeover of the Social Internet | WIRED https://www.wired.com/story/big-interview-jay-graber-bluesky/ 

Skylight | Skylight | Digital Picture Frame and Smart Calendar https://www.skylightframe.com/?srsltid=AfmBOoqq6AVnpoIAw3cudhBCFMoFp4DR3OP2QicGPylh19oFjMBLrenw 

Mark Cuban backs Skylight, a TikTok alternative built on Bluesky's underlying technology | TechCrunch https://techcrunch.com/2025/04/01/mark-cuban-backs-skylight-a-tiktok-alternative-built-on-blueskys-underlying-technology/ 

Big Education Ape: ELON, WHY DID YOU KILL THE BIRD PART 1 https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2024/11/elon-why-did-you-kill-bird.html 

Big Education Ape: ELON, WHY DID YOU KILL THE BIRD PART 2 #EDUSKY https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2024/12/elon-why-did-you-kill-bird-part-2.html 

Big Education Ape: UPDATE: X-TWITTER BIRDS FLOCK TO BLUESKY https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2024/11/x-twitter-birds-flock-to-bluesky.html 

Big Education Ape: ELON MUSK: THE GRINCH THAT STOLE TWITTER https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2024/12/elon-musk-grinch-that-stole-twitter.html