THE REDNECK BOOK BANNING TIK TOK CHALLENGE

 

THE REDNECK BOOK BANNING TIK TOK  CHALLENGE

Attention all rednecks! Have you heard about the latest Tik Tok challenge? It's called the Redneck Book Banning Challenge, and it's taking the nation by storm. The challenge is simple: who can ban the most books from libraries and schools? And guess what? The red states seem to be walking away with it!

Now, I know what you're thinking. "But wait a minute, isn't book banning a serious problem?" Well, yes, it is. But that doesn't mean we can't have a little fun with it, right?

According to the American Library Association, over 700 books were challenged or banned in 2021 alone. And who's leading the charge? None other than our favorite Christian non-profit organizations! Focus on the Family, The American Family Association, and Moms for Liberty are just a few of the groups that have been actively campaigning against books they deem "inappropriate" or "harmful" to children.

But let's be real here, folks. Book banning is just plain ignorant. You can't just ban books because they don't align with your beliefs or values. That's not how the world works. If we start banning books left and right, we're only breeding more ignorance.

And let's not forget about the importance of free speech and freedom of expression. When books are banned, people are denied access to information and ideas. How are we supposed to learn and grow as individuals if we're only exposed to a narrow-minded perspective?

So, if you're a redneck looking to participate in the book banning challenge, I urge you to reconsider. Instead of banning books, why not read them? You might just learn something new and expand your horizons.

And for those of you who are concerned about book banning, there are a few things you can do. First and foremost, speak out against it. Let your elected officials know that you oppose book banning. Support libraries and bookstores that sell books that are often banned. And most importantly, educate yourself and others about the importance of free speech and the dangers of book banning.

In conclusion, let's put an end to this Redneck Book Banning Tik Tok Challenge once and for all. It's time to embrace diversity of thought and ideas, and stop trying to silence those we disagree with. After all, as the saying goes, "The pen is mightier than the sword." So let's pick up a book instead of a ban hammer and start reading!

Over 1,900 library book titles targeted for censorship so far in 2023 : NPR https://www.npr.org/2023/09/20/1200647985/book-bans-libraries-schools 

School book bans show no signs of slowing, PEN America finds : NPR https://www.npr.org/2023/09/21/1200725104/book-bans-school-pen-america 

Katy ISD bans more books as Texas leads nation in ban attempts - Axios Houston https://www.axios.com/local/houston/2023/09/20/katy-isd-bans-books-texas 

'Toll of book banning' increases as Missouri ranks No. 3 among states, report says https://www.stltoday.com/life-entertainment/local/books/toll-of-book-banning-increases-as-missouri-ranks-no-3-among-states-report-says/article_9191edd6-57df-11ee-b4e0-674df3c44fcc.html 

Official says Florida "does not ban books" after releasing list of 300 books that have been banned - LGBTQ Nation https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/09/official-says-florida-does-not-ban-books-after-releasing-list-of-300-books-that-have-been-banned/ 

Ron DeSantis' Florida is No. 1 in book banning, free speech group says https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/politics/2023/09/21/ron-desantis-florida-is-no-1-in-book-banning-free-speech-group-says/70900798007/ 

‘Chilling’: Ariana Grande, Amanda Gorman and others sign letter against book bans | Books | The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/sep/19/celebrities-sign-letter-book-ban-ariana-grande-amanda-gorman 

US book bans and attempted bans rise as efforts extend to public libraries | Books | The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/sep/20/book-bans-us-rise-public-libraries 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI

The history of book banning in America dates back to the colonial era. In 1637, the Puritan government of Massachusetts Bay banned Thomas Morton's book *New English Canaan*, which was critical of Puritan society. Since then, there have been many other books that have been banned in America, for a variety of reasons.

In the 19th century, books were often banned for religious reasons. For example, in 1840, the Catholic Church banned the Bible in English, arguing that it should only be read in Latin by priests. In 1873, the federal government passed the Comstock Act, which banned the publication and distribution of obscene materials. This law was used to ban books that dealt with sex, contraception, and other topics that were considered taboo at the time.

In the 20th century, books were often banned for political reasons. For example, during the McCarthy era, many books were banned because they were suspected of being communist propaganda. In the 1960s and 1970s, many books were banned because they dealt with sex, drugs, and other controversial topics.

In recent years, there has been a resurgence of book banning in America. In 2021, there were more books banned in American schools than in any other year on record. The books that are being banned today are often about race, gender, and sexuality.

Here are some of the most famous books that have been banned in America:

• * *The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn* by Mark Twain
• * *To Kill a Mockingbird* by Harper Lee
• * *Catch-22* by Joseph Heller
• * *The Catcher in the Rye* by J.D. Salinger
• * *Beloved* by Toni Morrison
• * *The Perks of Being a Wallflower* by Stephen Chbosky
• * *Harry Potter* series by J.K. Rowling
• * *The Hunger Games* trilogy by Suzanne Collins
• * *Thirteen Reasons Why* by Jay Asher
• * *Gender Queer* by Maia Kobabe

Book banning is a serious problem because it denies people access to information and ideas. It is also a form of censorship, which is a threat to democracy.

**Why are books banned?**

• There are a variety of reasons why books are banned. Some books are banned for religious reasons, while others are banned for political reasons. Still others are banned for moral reasons.
• Books that are banned for religious reasons often deal with topics that are considered taboo by certain religions. For example, the Bible has been banned in some countries because it is considered to be a Christian text.
• Books that are banned for political reasons often deal with controversial topics, such as communism, socialism, and other political ideologies. For example, many books were banned in the Soviet Union because they were critical of the government.
• Books that are banned for moral reasons often deal with topics that are considered to be immoral, such as sex, drugs, and violence. For example, many books were banned in the United States during the Victorian era because they were considered to be too sexually suggestive.

**What are the effects of book banning?**

• Book banning has a number of negative consequences. First, it denies people access to information and ideas. This can be particularly harmful to students and scholars, who need access to a variety of materials in order to learn and conduct research.
• Second, book banning is a form of censorship. Censorship is a threat to democracy, because it prevents people from accessing the information they need to make informed decisions.
• Third, book banning can have a chilling effect on free speech. When books are banned, authors and publishers may be less likely to publish books on controversial topics. This can lead to a less informed and less engaged public.
• **What can be done to stop book banning?**

• There are a number of things that can be done to stop book banning. First, it is important to be aware of the books that are being banned and the reasons why they are being banned. This information can be used to challenge book bans and educate the public about the importance of free speech.
• Second, it is important to support libraries and bookstores that sell books that are often banned. Libraries and bookstores play an important role in ensuring that people have access to a variety of information and ideas.
• Third, it is important to contact your elected officials and let them know that you oppose book banning. Elected officials need to hear from their constituents on this issue in order to take action to protect free speech.

Book banning is a serious problem, but it is a problem that can be solved. By working together, we can ensure that everyone has access to the information and ideas they need to be informed citizens.

According to the American Library Association, 729 books were challenged or banned in 2021, with more than 1500 individual book bans taking place across the country. The following organizations and groups have been actively supporting book banning in the US:

• * **Focus on the Family** is a Christian non-profit organization that has been campaigning against books that it considers to be sexually suggestive or harmful to children. In 2021, Focus on the Family published a list of 100 books that it believes should be banned from libraries and schools.
• * **The American Family Association** is another Christian non-profit organization that has been involved in book banning campaigns. In 2015, the American Family Association launched a campaign to ban the book "Gender Queer: A Memoir" from schools and libraries.
• * **Moms for Liberty** is a conservative advocacy group that has been involved in book banning campaigns in recent years. In 2021, Moms for Liberty members challenged or banned over 100 books from schools and libraries across the country.
• * **No Left Turn in Education** is a conservative education advocacy group that has been involved in book banning campaigns. In 2022, No Left Turn in Education published a list of 200 books that it believes should be banned from schools and libraries.
• * **Parents Defending Education** is a conservative education advocacy group that has been involved in book banning campaigns. In 2022, Parents Defending Education launched a campaign to ban the book "The 1619 Project" from schools and libraries.

These are just a few of the organizations and groups that are actively supporting book banning in the US. It is important to note that book banning is a complex issue, and there are many different reasons why people support it. However, the organizations and groups listed above have been among the most active in supporting book banning campaigns in recent years.

It is also important to note that book banning is a threat to democracy and freedom of expression. When books are banned, people are denied access to information and ideas. This can be particularly harmful to students and scholars, who need access to a variety of materials in order to learn and conduct research.

If you are concerned about book banning, there are a number of things you can do. You can contact your elected officials and let them know that you oppose book banning. You can also support libraries and bookstores that sell books that are often banned. Finally, you can educate yourself and others about the importance of free speech and the dangers of book banning.

FROM BING AI

Thank you for your interest in the history of book banning in America. Here is a summary of what I found from my web search:

• - Book banning is the practice of censoring or removing books from public or school libraries, classrooms, or bookstores because of their content, language, or themes.
• - Book banning has a long history in the United States, dating back to the colonial era when religious authorities banned books that challenged their doctrines or morals.
• - Some of the earliest banned books in America were The Meritorious Price of Our Redemption by William Pynchon, which was burned in 1650 for its theological views, and The New English Canaan by Thomas Morton, which was banned in 1637 for its criticism of Puritan society.
• - Book banning became more prevalent during the slavery and Civil War periods, when books that supported abolition, such as Uncle Tom's Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe, or criticized slavery, such as Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass, were banned or restricted in the South.
• - In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, book banning was influenced by social movements and moral crusades that targeted books that were considered obscene, immoral, or indecent, such as Ulysses by James Joyce, Lady Chatterley's Lover by D.H. Lawrence, and The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger.
• - In the mid-20th century, book banning shifted to schools and libraries, where parents, teachers, administrators, and community groups challenged books that they deemed inappropriate or offensive for children or young adults. Some of the most frequently challenged books in this period were The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, and The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck.
• - In 1982, the Supreme Court ruled in Island Trees School District v. Pico that school officials cannot ban books solely based on their content, affirming the constitutional right to read. However, book banning and challenging continued to occur at local levels, often involving court cases and public debates.
• - In recent years, book banning and challenging have increased significantly, especially targeting books that feature or address LGBTQ+ issues, people of color, racism, sexism, violence, sexuality, religion, or politics. Some of the most challenged books in 2020 were George by Alex Gino, Stamped: Racism, Antiracism, and You by Ibram X. Kendi and Jason Reynolds, and Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling.
• - Book banning and challenging have been opposed by various organizations and individuals who advocate for intellectual freedom and the right to read. The American Library Association (ALA) organizes an annual Banned Books Week to raise awareness and celebrate the books that have been banned or challenged throughout history.

Bing, 9/21/2023

• (1) The history of book bans in the United States - National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/history-of-book-bans-in-the-united-states.
• (2) The little-known history of banned books in the United States. https://readingpartners.org/blog/history-banned-books-week/.
• (3) PEN America reports book bans in Florida and U.S. grow by the thousands. What we know. https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/education/2023/09/21/books-bans-florida-pen-america-report-picture-health-lgbtq-people-of-color-book-banning-schools/70910852007/.
• (4) Book-ban efforts continue at record pace, reports American Library Association. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/book-ban-efforts-continue-at-record-pace-reports-american-library-association/ar-AA1h17Mj.
• (5) How many books were banned in Missouri last year? This report logs state at 3rd highest. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/how-many-books-were-banned-in-missouri-last-year-this-report-logs-state-at-3rd-highest/ar-AA1h30ox.
• (6) The history of book bans in the United States - National Geographic. https://bing.com/search?q=history+of+book+banning+in+America.

According to my web search, there are many organizations and groups that are actively supporting book banning in the US. Some of them are:

• - **Moms for Liberty**: A national organization that claims to advocate for parental rights in education. It has been involved in several book challenges and bans in school districts across the country, such as in Tennessee, Florida, and Texas. It has also launched a website called [Book Report](^1^) that lists books it considers inappropriate or harmful for children⁴⁵.
• - **Parents Defending Education**: A national organization that aims to "reclaim" schools from "activists" who promote "indoctrination". It has filed complaints and lawsuits against schools and districts that use books or curricula that address topics such as racism, sexism, LGBTQ+ issues, or social justice. It also provides a [toolkit](^2^) for parents to challenge books and materials in schools⁴⁵.
• - **No Left Turn in Education**: A national organization that opposes the teaching of "critical race theory" and "woke ideology" in schools. It has organized protests and campaigns to remove books and resources that it deems "divisive" or "anti-American" from schools and libraries. It also offers a [guide](^3^) for parents to fight against book censorship⁴⁵.
• - **Family Policy Alliance**: A national organization that promotes "biblical citizenship" and "family values". It has supported efforts to ban books that feature or discuss LGBTQ+ characters or issues, such as George by Alex Gino and The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas. It also provides a [resource](^4^) for parents to protect their children from "harmful" books⁴⁵.

These are just some examples of the groups that support book banning in the US. There are many more groups operating at different levels and locations, often presenting themselves as grassroots efforts, while in reality they have links to prominent, wealthy, or influential individuals or organizations⁴⁵. These groups pose a serious threat to the freedom to read and the right to access information for everyone.

Bing, 9/21/2023

• (1) More than 25 organizations join forces with the American Library .... https://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2022/05/organizations-join-ala-unite-against-book-bans.
• (2) Banned in the USA: The Growing Movement to Ban Books - PEN America. https://pen.org/report/banned-usa-growing-movement-to-censor-books-in-schools/.
• (3) At Least 50 Groups in the U.S. Advocated Banning Books This Year. https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/9/20/least-50-groups-us-advocated-banning-books-year.
• (4) Unite Against Book Bans - Unite Against Book Bans. https://uniteagainstbookbans.org/.
• (5) ‘Unparalleled in intensity’ – 1,500 book bans in US school districts .... https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/apr/07/book-bans-pen-america-school-districts.
• (6) Banned in the USA: The Growing Movement to Ban Books - PEN America. https://pen.org/report/banned-usa-growing-movement-to-censor-books-in-schools/.

STANDARDIZED TESTING SUCKS

 

STANDARDIZED TESTING SUCKS

Larry Strauss Opinion contributor

Standardized testing sucks worse than a cheap vacuum cleaner. There, I said it. As a high school English teacher, I've seen firsthand how these tests have become a tyrant that sucks the life out of learning. It's time to stop prioritizing test scores over student learning and start focusing on what really matters.

Let's be real here, standardized tests only determine which students are good at taking tests. They offer no meaningful measure of progress and have not improved student performance. Instead, they measure a narrow range of skills and knowledge, leaving out important aspects like creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, and social-emotional skills. It's like trying to judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree.

And let's not forget about the culture of teaching to the test that standardized testing creates. It reduces the quality and diversity of curriculum and instruction, leaving students bored and unchallenged. I mean, who wants to spend their days memorizing facts just to regurgitate them on a test?

But it gets worse. Standardized tests are racist, classist, and sexist. They reflect the biases and assumptions of the test developers, who are predominantly white, male, and affluent. This puts students from different cultural, linguistic, or socioeconomic backgrounds at a disadvantage. And don't even get me started on how they perpetuate stereotypes and discrimination against certain groups of students.

And let's not forget about how unfair standardized tests are as metrics for teacher evaluations. They don't account for the many factors that affect student learning and achievement, like poverty, family background, health, motivation, attendance, behavior, or prior knowledge. They also don't measure the many aspects of effective teaching, like rapport with students, classroom management, differentiation, or pedagogy. It's like trying to judge a chef on how well they can make toast.

But the worst part? Standardized test scores are not predictors of future success. They don't measure the skills and competencies that are essential for success in the 21st century, like creativity, innovation, entrepreneurship, leadership, communication, or teamwork. They limit students' opportunities and choices by narrowing their options or excluding them from certain programs or institutions based on their test scores. It's like trying to judge a bird on how well it can swim.

So what can we do to address the negative consequences of standardized testing? Well, for starters, we can reduce the number of tests students are required to take. We can use standardized test results in conjunction with other data, like teacher assessments and student portfolios, to make decisions about student progress and placement. We can provide more support to students who are struggling with standardized tests. And we can develop tests that are less biased against certain groups of students.

It's time to stop sucking the life out of learning with standardized testing. Let's focus on what really matters: student learning, excitement, and joy. Because let's face it, no one wants to spend their days being sucked dry by a cheap vacuum cleaner.

Schools' obsession with standardized testing is ruining education https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2023/09/21/test-scores-standardized-testing-bad-measure-education-learning/70856233007/ 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI

Standardized testing has been a part of the American education system for over a century. The first standardized test, the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, was developed in 1924. Since then, standardized testing has become increasingly important, with students now taking standardized tests at multiple grade levels and in multiple subjects.

The focus on standardized testing in American schools is due to a number of factors, including:

• * **The rise of accountability:** In the 1990s, there was a growing movement to hold schools accountable for student performance. This led to the development of standardized tests that could be used to compare the performance of different schools.
• * **The belief that standardized tests can measure student learning:** Standardized tests are designed to measure student learning in specific subjects. This belief is based on the idea that there is a common body of knowledge that all students should learn.
• * **The pressure from colleges and universities:** Many colleges and universities require students to submit standardized test scores as part of their applications. This pressure has led to students taking standardized tests at a younger age and taking them more often.

The focus on standardized testing has a number of positive and negative consequences.

**Positive consequences:**

• * Standardized tests can provide data that can be used to track student progress and identify students who may need additional support.
• * Standardized tests can help to ensure that all students are learning the same core skills and knowledge.
• * Standardized tests can help to prepare students for college and the workforce.

**Negative consequences:**

• * Standardized tests can be stressful for students and can lead to test anxiety.
• * Standardized tests can narrow the curriculum, as teachers may focus on teaching to the test.
• * Standardized tests can be biased against certain groups of students, such as low-income students and students of color.
• * Standardized tests can be expensive to develop and administer.

The focus on standardized testing in American schools is a complex issue with both positive and negative consequences. It is important to weigh the pros and cons of standardized testing before deciding whether or not to support their use.

**What can be done to address the negative consequences of standardized testing?**

There are a number of things that can be done to address the negative consequences of standardized testing, including:

* **Reduce the number of standardized tests that students are required to take.**

* **Use standardized test results in conjunction with other data, such as teacher assessments and student portfolios, to make decisions about student progress and placement.**

* **Provide more support to students who are struggling with standardized tests.**

* **Develop standardized tests that are less biased against certain groups of students.**

By taking these steps, we can help to reduce the negative consequences of standardized testing and ensure that all students have the opportunity to succeed.

FROM BING AI

Standardized testing in American schools is a controversial topic that has been debated for decades. Some of the pros and cons of standardized testing are:

Pros:

• - Standardized tests offer an objective measurement of education and a good metric to gauge areas for improvement. They assess students based on a similar set of questions, are given under nearly identical testing conditions, and are graded by a machine or blind reviewer. They are intended to provide an accurate, unfiltered measure of what a student knows⁵.
• - Standardized tests offer meaningful data to help students in marginalized groups. They can reveal achievement gaps among different subgroups of students, such as racial/ethnic minorities, low-income students, English language learners, and students with disabilities. They can also hold schools accountable for providing quality education to all students and ensure that they receive the necessary resources and interventions⁵.
• - Standardized tests are useful metrics for teacher evaluations. They can provide feedback to teachers on their strengths and weaknesses, as well as inform professional development and instructional decisions. They can also reward effective teachers with bonuses or recognition, and identify ineffective teachers who need improvement or dismissal⁵.
• - Standardized tests scores are good indicators of college and job success. They can predict students' academic performance and readiness for higher education, as well as their potential for career advancement and earnings. They can also help students choose the best college or career path for them based on their interests and abilities⁵.

Cons:

• - Standardized tests only determine which students are good at taking tests, offer no meaningful measure of progress, and have not improved student performance. They measure a narrow range of skills and knowledge, and do not capture students' creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, or social-emotional skills. They also create a culture of teaching to the test, which reduces the quality and diversity of curriculum and instruction. They have not led to significant improvements in student achievement or equity, as evidenced by the declining rankings of US students in international comparisons⁵.
• - Standardized tests are racist, classist, and sexist. They reflect the biases and assumptions of the test developers, who are predominantly white, male, and affluent. They disadvantage students who come from different cultural, linguistic, or socioeconomic backgrounds, who may not be familiar with the test content or format. They also perpetuate stereotypes and discrimination against certain groups of students, who may face lower expectations or negative labels based on their test scores⁵.
• - Standardized tests are unfair metrics for teacher evaluations. They do not account for the many factors that affect student learning and achievement, such as poverty, family background, health, motivation, attendance, behavior, or prior knowledge. They also do not measure the many aspects of effective teaching, such as rapport with students, classroom management, differentiation, or pedagogy. They can lead to unfair consequences for teachers, such as loss of autonomy, morale, or job security⁵.
• - Standardized tests scores are not predictors of future success. They do not measure the skills and competencies that are essential for success in the 21st century, such as creativity, innovation, entrepreneurship, leadership, communication, or teamwork. They also do not account for the changing nature of work and learning in a globalized and digitalized world. They can limit students' opportunities and choices by narrowing their options or excluding them from certain programs or institutions based on their test scores⁵.

Bing, 9/21/2023

• (1) Standardized Testing Pros and Cons - Does It Improve Education?. https://standardizedtests.procon.org/.
• (2) History of Standardized Testing in the United States | NEA. https://www.nea.org/professional-excellence/student-engagement/tools-tips/history-standardized-testing-united-states.
• (3) Future of Testing in Education: Effective and Equitable Assessment .... https://www.americanprogress.org/article/future-testing-education-effective-equitable-assessment-systems/.
• (4) Schools must give standardized tests this year, Biden ... - EdSource. https://edsource.org/2021/schools-must-give-standardized-tests-this-spring/649751.
• (5) Prepare for U.S. Standardized Tests | EducationUSA. https://educationusa.state.gov/your-5-steps-us-study/research-your-options/graduate/prepare-us-standardized-tests.
• (6) Pro and Con: Standardized Tests | Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/story/pro-and-con-standardized-tests.
• (7) Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing - Part Two - NWEF. https://noahwebstereducationalfoundation.org/pros-and-cons-of-standardized-testing-part-two/.
• (8) Standardized Testing - Pros & Cons Part 1 - NWEF. https://noahwebstereducationalfoundation.org/pros-and-cons-of-standardized-testing-part-one/.

JIM CROW FUNDING FOR HBCUS

JIM CROW FUNDING FOR HBCUS

In a shocking turn of events, the Biden administration has discovered that historically Black land-grant colleges have been underfunded by hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars over the past 30 years. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack signed the memos, which are the first time the government has attempted to put a comprehensive number on the financial discrimination against these institutions.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "Jim Crow funding? Is that some kind of new Kickstarter campaign for racists?" But no, dear reader, it's much worse than that. Jim Crow funding refers to the systematic underfunding of historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) by the government.

HBCUs were founded to provide educational opportunities to Black Americans during a time when they were largely excluded from white institutions. These institutions have played a vital role in the education and empowerment of Black Americans, and they continue to do so today. But unfortunately, they have long been underfunded by the government.

In 2018, for example, HBCUs received only 3% of all federal funding for higher education, despite serving 10% of all Black college students. This underfunding has a number of negative consequences for HBCUs, including higher tuition and fees, fewer resources for students, and lower salaries for faculty and staff.

But let's be real here, folks. The government isn't just underfunding HBCUs because they're racist (although that's certainly a possibility). They're also underfunding them because they're cheap. It's like when you go to a fancy restaurant and they charge you $20 for a tiny piece of chicken breast. You know they could give you more, but they don't want to because they're trying to save money.

So what can be done to address this underfunding? Well, the government could start by increasing federal funding for HBCUs. They could also create targeted funding programs for HBCUs that focus on specific areas of need, such as STEM education, infrastructure, and faculty development. And they could provide tax breaks to donors to HBCUs, which would encourage more people to give to these institutions.

But let's be real here, folks. The government isn't going to do any of that. They're too busy spending money on things like building walls and buying tanks. So what can we do to help HBCUs? Well, we could start by donating money to them ourselves. I mean, sure, we could spend that money on things like avocado toast and fancy coffee drinks, but wouldn't it feel better to know that we're helping to support an institution that has played such an important role in the education and empowerment of Black Americans?

And if you're not convinced yet, think about this: HBCUs are some of the coolest colleges and universities out there. They have a rich history and culture that you just don't find at predominantly white institutions. Plus, they produce some seriously talented graduates. Did you know that Oprah Winfrey went to Tennessee State University? Or that Thurgood Marshall went to Howard University? Or that Kamala Harris went to Howard University too? That's right, folks. HBCUs are where the cool kids go.

So let's show some love to our HBCUs. Let's donate money to them, attend their events, and spread the word about how awesome they are. And who knows? Maybe one day we'll be able to say that we helped to end Jim Crow funding for good.

The Government Finally Acknowledges That It’s Been Underfunding HBCUs - The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/09/land-grant-colleges-underfunded-biden-administration/675379/ 

University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff chancellor reacts to Biden administration letter claiming state underfunding of school | KARK https://www.kark.com/news/education/university-of-arkansas-at-pine-bluff-chancellor-reacts-to-biden-administration-letter-claiming-state-underfunding-of-school/ 

Tennessee lawmakers react to federal claim that HBCU's were underfunded billions of dollars | WZTV https://fox17.com/newsletter-daily/tennessee-lawmakers-react-to-federal-claim-that-hbcus-were-underfunded-billions-of-dollars 

Fort Valley State University missed funding over 30 years. | 13wmaz.com https://www.13wmaz.com/article/news/education/fort-valley-state-university-missed-funding-30-yearrs/93-2926bf9e-043b-4fbe-8888-9fec88781ade 

THE DEFT DIVE 

FROM BARD AI 

Underfunding of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs)

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) are institutions of higher education that were founded to provide educational opportunities to Black Americans during a time when they were largely excluded from white institutions. HBCUs have played a vital role in the education and empowerment of Black Americans, and they continue to do so today.

However, HBCUs have long been underfunded by the government. In 2018, for example, HBCUs received only 3% of all federal funding for higher education, despite serving 10% of all Black college students. This underfunding has a number of negative consequences for HBCUs, including:

• * **Higher tuition and fees:** HBCUs must rely more heavily on tuition and fees to cover their costs, which can make them less affordable for students.
• * **Fewer resources for students:** HBCUs often have fewer resources than predominantly white institutions, such as smaller libraries, fewer research opportunities, and less state-of-the-art equipment.
• * **Lower salaries for faculty and staff:** HBCU faculty and staff are often paid less than their counterparts at predominantly white institutions.

The underfunding of HBCUs is a serious problem that needs to be addressed. HBCUs play an important role in the education and empowerment of Black Americans, and they deserve to be adequately funded by the government.

**Here are some specific examples of how underfunding has impacted HBCUs:**

• * In 2017, the National Endowment for the Humanities awarded HBCUs just 3.5% of its grants, despite HBCUs serving 10% of all Black college students.
• * In 2018, the National Science Foundation awarded HBCUs just 5.5% of its research grants, despite HBCUs producing 13% of all Black bachelor's degrees in science and engineering.
• * In 2019, the National Institutes of Health awarded HBCUs just 4.5% of its research grants, despite HBCUs producing 12% of all Black bachelor's degrees in health professions.

This underfunding has a direct impact on the quality of education that HBCU students receive. For example, HBCUs often have fewer resources to invest in their libraries, laboratories, and other facilities. They also have fewer faculty and staff, which can lead to larger class sizes and less individualized attention for students.

The underfunding of HBCUs is also a racial justice issue. Black students deserve to have access to high-quality education, and they should not be penalized because they choose to attend an HBCU. The government needs to do more to support HBCUs and ensure that they have the resources they need to succeed.

**What can be done to address the underfunding of HBCUs?**

There are a number of things that can be done to address the underfunding of HBCUs, including:

• * **Increase federal funding for HBCUs:** The federal government should increase its funding for HBCUs, both in terms of overall funding and in terms of funding for specific programs and initiatives.
• * **Create targeted funding programs for HBCUs:** The federal government should create targeted funding programs for HBCUs that focus on specific areas of need, such as STEM education, infrastructure, and faculty development.
• * **Provide tax breaks to donors to HBCUs:** The federal government should provide tax breaks to donors to HBCUs, which would encourage more people to give to these institutions.
• * **Increase the number of HBCUs that are eligible for Pell Grants:** The Pell Grant is the largest federal grant program for low-income students. The federal government should increase the number of HBCUs that are eligible for Pell Grants, which would make them more affordable for low-income students.

By taking these steps, the government can help to ensure that HBCUs have the resources they need to succeed and that Black students have access to high-quality education.

FROM BING AI

Here is a brief report on the government underfunding of historic black colleges and universities (HBCUs):

• - HBCUs are institutions of higher education that were established before 1964 with the primary mission of educating African Americans. There are more than 100 HBCUs in the U.S., serving about 300,000 students, mostly from low-income and first-generation backgrounds.
• - HBCUs have historically faced discrimination and underfunding from both federal and state governments. One of the sources of this inequity is the Second Morrill Act of 1890, which created 19 land-grant HBCUs in 17 states. These institutions were supposed to receive equal funding from their states as their predominantly white land-grant counterparts, which were established by the First Morrill Act of 1862. However, many states failed to comply with this requirement, resulting in a cumulative funding gap of $13 billion over 30 years, according to a recent analysis by the Biden administration³.
• - The underfunding of HBCU land grants has had negative impacts on their academic quality, research capacity, infrastructure, student services, and enrollment. For example, some HBCU land grants have outdated facilities, low graduation rates, high student debt, and limited access to federal grants and contracts. These challenges have also affected their ability to fulfill their mission of serving the needs of Black communities and addressing racial disparities in various fields.
• - The Biden administration has taken some steps to address the underfunding of HBCU land grants, such as sending letters to 16 governors urging them to rectify the funding inequities³, allocating $1.6 billion to HBCUs in the American Rescue Plan¹, and proposing $45 billion for HBCUs in the Build Back Better plan⁴. However, these efforts have faced opposition from some Republican lawmakers and state officials, who argue that they are unfair or unnecessary. Moreover, the proposed funding for HBCUs has been reduced to $2 billion in the latest version of the spending plan due to Democratic infighting⁴.
• - HBCU advocates and leaders have called for more action from the federal and state governments to ensure that HBCU land grants receive equitable and sustainable funding. They have also sought support from private donors, corporations, foundations, and alumni to enhance their resources and programs. Some examples of recent donations to HBCUs include $40 million from MacKenzie Scott⁵, $20 million from Netflix⁵, and $10 million from Google⁵.

Bing, 9/21/2023

• (1) States underfunded Black land grants by $13B over 30 years. https://bing.com/search?q=government+underfunding+of+historic+black+colleges+and+universities.
• (2) The Government Finally Acknowledges That It’s Been Underfunding HBCUs .... https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/09/land-grant-colleges-underfunded-biden-administration/675379/.
• (3) HBCU Funding Falls From $45 Billion to $2 Billion Under ... - Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/hbcu-funding-falls-45-billion-2-billion-under-latest-biden-spending-plan-1635870.
• (4) Black colleges were denied state funding for decades. Now they're .... https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hbcu-coppin-state-tennessee-state-federal-funding-howard-kamala-harris/.
• (5) States underfunded Black land grants by $13B over 30 years. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/government/2023/09/20/states-underfunded-black-land-grants-13b-over-30-years.

GREAT DAD JOKES MAYBE THE KEY TO YOUR CHILD'S EDUCATION

 

GREAT DAD JOKES MAYBE THE KEY TO YOUR CHILD'S EDUCATION

Dads, listen up! You may think that your role in your child's education is limited to paying for their textbooks and nagging them to do their homework, but a recent study has shown that you can do so much more. In fact, you can be the key to unlocking your child's full potential!

According to the University of Leeds, fathers who engage in playful and educational activities with their children can have a "unique and important effect" on their educational outcomes. That's right, dads, you have the power to shape your child's future with just ten minutes of quality time a day. So put down that remote and pick up a book, because it's time to get involved!

Now, I know what you're thinking. "But I don't know how to read!" Well, fear not, my illiterate friend. There are plenty of other ways to engage with your child that don't require any literacy skills whatsoever. For example, you could play a game of catch, sing a silly song, or draw a picture together. The possibilities are endless!

And don't worry if you're not the most creative person in the world. Your child doesn't care if your drawings look like they were done by a drunk monkey with a crayon. They just want to spend time with you and have fun. So let loose and embrace your inner child!

But wait, there's more! The study also found that greater involvement by fathers before their child attends primary school gives an educational advantage to children in their first year. So if you have a little one at home, now is the perfect time to start building that bond.

And if your child is already in primary school, don't worry. It's never too late to get involved. In fact, greater involvement at five can help increase attainment in key stage 1 assessments at seven. So even if you've been slacking off until now, there's still time to make a difference.

So what are you waiting for, dads? It's time to put down that beer and pick up a board game. Your child's future is in your hands (or rather, your funny bone). Let's show those mums who's boss!

Fathers have ‘unique effect’ on children’s educational outcomes, study finds | Children | The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/sep/20/fathers-have-unique-effect-on-childrens-educational-outcomes-study-finds 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI

Fathers play a vital role in their children's education, and their involvement can have a significant impact on their children's academic success. Research has shown that children with involved fathers are more likely to:

• * Earn higher grades and test scores
• * Have better attendance and fewer behavioral problems
• * Graduate from high school and go on to college
• * Be successful in their careers

There are a number of ways that fathers can be involved in their children's education. Some simple things that fathers can do include:

• * Talking to their children about their day and their schoolwork
• * Helping their children with homework
• * Reading to their children
• * Attending school events and parent-teacher conferences
• * Volunteering at their children's school
• * Showing interest in their children's academic and extracurricular activities

Fathers can also support their children's education by creating a positive and supportive home environment. This means providing their children with a quiet place to study, helping them to develop good study habits, and encouraging them to do their best.

Here are some specific examples of how fathers can support their children's education:

• * **Read to your children every day.** This is one of the best things you can do to help your children develop a love of reading and learning.
• * **Help your children with their homework.** This doesn't mean doing their homework for them, but it does mean being available to help them when they need it.
• * **Talk to your children about their school day.** Ask them what they learned, what they enjoyed, and what they found challenging.
• * **Attend school events and parent-teacher conferences.** This shows your children that you are interested in their education and that you support their teachers.
• * **Volunteer at your children's school.** This is a great way to get involved in your children's education and to show your support for the school community.
• * **Show interest in your children's academic and extracurricular activities.** Go to their sporting events, plays, and concerts. Ask them about their interests and hobbies.

Fathers who are involved in their children's education are not only helping their children to succeed academically, but they are also helping them to develop into well-rounded and successful adults.

FROM BING AI 

The importance of dad in the success of a child's education. Here are some key points:

• - When fathers are involved in the lives of their children, especially their education, children learn more, perform better in school, and exhibit healthier behavior¹.
• - Fathers play an important role in a child's development and can affect a child's social competence, performance in school and emotion regulation³.
• - Fathers can also influence a child's well-being indirectly through their relationship with the child's mother. Supportive co-parenting relationships are related to better self-regulation and fewer behavior problems in children³.
• - Fathers are not just helpers for mothers but are important to children in their own right. For example, preschoolers with involved fathers have stronger verbal skills than those with less involved fathers¹. Girls who have a close, warm relationship with their father have stronger math skills and abilities¹. Boys with highly involved fathers in their life receive higher grades and perform a year above their expected age level on achievement tests¹.

Bing, 9/20/2023

• (1) Father Involvement in Education | Fatherhood.gov. https://www.fatherhood.gov/for-dads/father-involvement-education.
• (2) The Importance of Fathers for Child Development - Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/parenting-and-culture/202106/the-importance-fathers-child-development.
• (3) Father Involvement in Education | Fatherhood.gov. https://www.fatherhood.gov/for-dads/father-involvement-education.
• (4) The Importance of Fathers for Child Development - Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/parenting-and-culture/202106/the-importance-fathers-child-development.
• (5) Why Fatherhood Is Important to a Child’s Education. https://learningliftoff.com/family/parenting/fatherhood-important-education/.
• (6) . https://bing.com/search?q=the+importance+of+dad+in+the+success+of+a+child%27s+education.
• (7) undefined. https://www.all4kids.org/news/blog/why-fatherhood-engagement-matters/.

TEXAS TEACHER FIRED FOR READING ABOUT ANNE FRANKS PERIOD

 

TEXAS TEACHER FIRED FOR READING ABOUT ANNE FRANKS PERIOD

In a bizarre turn of events, a Texas middle school teacher has been fired for reading a passage from an illustrated version of Anne Frank's diary that included discussions of male and female genitalia. Yes, you heard that right. Apparently, the school district deemed this "unapproved" literature, and decided to give the teacher the boot.

Now, I don't know about you, but when I think of Anne Frank's diary, I don't exactly think of it as a steamy romance novel. But apparently, there are some pretty racy parts in there that we've all been missing out on. Who knew?

The passage in question comes from Anne Frank's Diary: The Graphic Adaptation, which is a full and unabridged version of her diary, including sections that were initially removed and later re-added about her sexuality and puberty. And let me tell you, it's a real page-turner.

According to reports, the passage in question includes discussions of Anne's period, as well as a memory of her asking a female friend to show her breasts. Now, I don't know about you, but when I was in middle school, the most scandalous thing we talked about was who had a crush on who. These kids today are wild.

But in all seriousness, it's pretty ridiculous that this teacher was fired for reading from a book that is meant to educate and inform. It's not like she was showing them Fifty Shades of Grey or anything. And let's be real, if kids these days are getting their kicks from reading about Anne Frank's period, we've got bigger problems on our hands.

This isn't the first time that Anne Frank's Diary: The Graphic Adaptation has been at the center of controversy. In April, it was banned from a high school in Florida for similar reasons. And according to a report by PEN America, books containing LGBTQ+ themes, topics of race and racism, or sexual content are the most frequently banned in the United States.

It's a shame that we live in a world where books are still being banned and censored. As the late great Robin Williams once said, "Censorship is like telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it." Let's trust our teachers to do their jobs and educate our children without fear of retribution.

In conclusion, let's all take a moment to appreciate the fact that we live in a world where Anne Frank's diary is considered too scandalous for middle schoolers. It's a funny old world we live in, folks.

Texas teacher 'investigated' for reading Anne Frank novel in class https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/09/20/texas-ane-frank-diary-graphic-novel-teacher-fired/ 

Texas teacher fired over graphic 'Diary of Anne Frank' adaptation assignment to eighth graders - The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/09/20/texas-teacher-anne-frank-fired/ 

School fires teacher for assigning lesbian readings from "Diary of Anne Frank" - LGBTQ Nation https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/09/school-fires-teacher-over-lesbian-passages-from-the-diary-of-anne-frank/ 

THE WORLD WIDE EFFORT TO DEFUND PUBLIC EDUCATION IS REAL

 

THE WORLD WIDE EFFORT TO DEFUND PUBLIC EDUCATION IS REAL

France’s schools are SO screwed up that they could easily be mistaken for a red state in the US. It's like they're mirroring the right wing policies in American education. And we all know how that usually goes - it always begins with defunding. But what's even more hilarious is that the media only focuses on culture wars issues, just like in the US. Sound familiar? It should, because it's right out of the billionaire's playbook for destroying public education. 

Chronic underfunding has led to a record exodus of teachers, but the government is using populist policy as a cheap distraction. Instead of addressing the real issues, they'd rather create a controversy over what children are wearing to school. Yes, you read that right - what they're wearing! As if that's going to solve anything. 

Politicians and policymakers are playing on the fear of Islam as an easy way to mobilize public opinion and pander to populist ideas. But let's be real here - what does a child's clothing have to do with their education? It's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline. 

Staff shortages, long hours of teaching, some of the worst pupil-teacher ratios in Europe, and bullying are rampant in many schools. And it's no wonder that two cases a month of schoolchildren taking their own lives have been reported. French education has been the object of international concern for nearly two decades, among the EU countries where cultural and socioeconomic background has the greatest influence on learning outcomes. 

French schools are reproducing social inequality, preventing the most severely disadvantaged students from ever escaping the unfair circumstances many of them grow up in. With state schools slowly disintegrating, more prosperous families are turning to private education, which also receive public funding. This raises questions about the national investment in children who need it the most. 

It's like the French government is playing a game of Jenga with their education system - pulling out one block at a time until the whole thing comes crashing down. And what's left? A bunch of confused students who don't know whether they're coming or going. 

But let's not forget about the funny side of things. It's like watching a comedy show where the jokes just keep coming. The French government is so focused on culture wars that they're missing the bigger picture. It's like trying to put a band-aid on a broken leg - it's not going to work! 

So, what can we do? Well, for starters, we need to stop focusing on trivial issues and start addressing the real problems at hand. We need to invest in our teachers and our students, and give them the resources they need to succeed. We need to stop playing politics with our education system and start putting our children first. 

In conclusion, France's education system is in dire need of a makeover. We need to stop pretending that everything is okay and start taking action. Let's invest in our future and give our children the education they deserve. Who knows, maybe one day they'll look back and laugh at how screwed up things used to be.

France’s schools are in crisis – and it has nothing to do with pupils’ dress | Rokhaya Diallo | The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/sep/20/frances-schools-are-in-crisis-and-it-has-nothing-to-do-with-pupils-dress 

WHY DO WE STILL BEAT ON KIDS IN SCHOOLS: IT DOESN'T WORK

WHY DO WE STILL BEAT ON KIDS IN SCHOOLS: IT DOESN'T WORK

Ah, corporal punishment in schools. The age-old tradition of smacking kids' bottoms to teach them a lesson. Because apparently, nothing says "I'm here to educate you" like a good old-fashioned spanking. But hey, it's 2023, people! We have self-driving cars and robots that can do our laundry. Can't we come up with a more civilized way to discipline our children?

Now, I'm not saying that kids shouldn't be disciplined. Trust me, as a parent, I know the struggle. But there has to be a better way than resorting to physical violence. I mean, we don't go around smacking adults when they mess up, do we? Well, unless you count those reality TV shows where people throw drinks at each other. But that's a whole other can of worms.

So why do we still beat on kids in schools? Is it because we secretly enjoy it? Are there secret sadist societies that get together and discuss the best techniques for spanking? Or maybe it's just because some people are stuck in the past and can't let go of outdated practices. Come on, people, it's time to join the 21st century!

But let's take a step back and look at the arguments for and against corporal punishment. On one hand, you have those who believe that it's a traditional and biblical method of discipline. They argue that it teaches students to obey authority and follow rules. Well, if that's the case, I guess we should start stoning people for wearing mixed fabrics or eating shellfish. After all, it's in the Bible, right?

On the other hand, you have those who argue that corporal punishment is a form of violence that can cause physical and psychological harm to students. Bruises, injuries, low self-esteem, anxiety, depression - these are just a few of the lovely side effects of smacking kids around. And let's not forget that it's completely ineffective. It doesn't address the root causes of misbehavior and may even make things worse. Talk about a fail!

But fear not, my friends, for there is hope! We live in an age of innovation and progress. We have evidence-based methods that can actually work. Positive reinforcement, time-outs, detention - these are just a few examples of alternative forms of discipline that are more effective and don't involve hurting children. Imagine that!

And guess what? The American Psychological Association agrees with me. They say that corporal punishment is not an effective way to discipline students and that it can have harmful consequences. They also point out that it's disproportionately used against students of color and students with disabilities. So not only is it ineffective, but it's also discriminatory. Double fail!

But hey, don't take my word for it. Let's look at the numbers. The use of corporal punishment in schools has been on the decline in recent years. More and more states are banning it or allowing parents to opt out. It's like we're finally waking up from a bad dream and realizing that there's a better way.

In fact, just recently, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona urged governors and school leaders to ban corporal punishment in schools. He wants us to replace it with evidence-based methods. You know, because science and stuff. I don't know about you, but I think it's about time we start listening to the experts.

So there you have it, folks. The case against beating on kids in schools is pretty clear. It doesn't work, it's harmful, and it's just plain old-fashioned. Let's leave the spanking to the Fifty Shades of Grey enthusiasts and focus on educating our children in a safe and nurturing environment.

It's 2023, for God's sake! Let's move forward and leave the dark ages behind us. And if anyone tries to argue in favor of corporal punishment, just give them a good slap on the wrist - metaphorically speaking, of course. After all, violence is never the answer... unless you're talking about slapping mosquitoes. Those little bloodsuckers deserve it.

Now go forth, my friends, and spread the word. Let's put an end to this outdated practice once and for all. Our children deserve better!

Texas principal arrested after administering legal corporal punishment | The Texas Tribune https://www.texastribune.org/2023/09/19/texas-principal-corporal-punishment/ 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI

Corporal punishment in schools is the use of physical force to discipline students. It can include hitting, spanking, and paddling. Corporal punishment is permitted in some schools in the United States, but it is banned in many other countries.

There is a lot of debate about the pros and cons of corporal punishment in schools. Some people believe that it is an effective way to deter bad behavior and teach students discipline. Others believe that it is a form of child abuse and that it can have negative physical and psychological consequences for students.

There is some evidence to suggest that corporal punishment can be effective in reducing student misbehavior in the short term. However, there is also evidence to suggest that it can have negative long-term consequences, such as increased aggression, decreased academic achievement, and mental health problems.

The American Psychological Association (APA) opposes the use of corporal punishment in schools. The APA states that corporal punishment is not an effective way to discipline students and that it can have harmful consequences for both the students and the school environment.

The APA also states that corporal punishment is disproportionately used against students of color and students with disabilities.

There are a number of alternative forms of discipline that can be used in schools, such as positive reinforcement, time-outs, and detention. These alternative forms of discipline are more effective than corporal punishment and they do not have the same negative consequences.

In conclusion, there is no evidence to suggest that corporal punishment is an effective way to discipline students in schools. There is, however, evidence to suggest that it can have negative physical and psychological consequences for students. There are a number of alternative forms of discipline that can be used in schools that are more effective and do not have the same negative consequences.

FROM BING AI

Corporal punishment in schools that permits hitting, spanking and paddling in schools.

Corporal punishment is the deliberate infliction of physical pain by hitting, paddling, spanking, slapping, or any other physical force used as a means of discipline². It is legal in public schools in 19 states in the U.S., including Texas¹³. It is also legal in private schools in every state except New Jersey and Iowa³.

However, corporal punishment is a controversial practice that has been debated by lawmakers, educators, parents, and students. Some argue that it is an effective way to deter misbehavior and teach respect, while others claim that it is abusive, harmful, and violates human rights. Some of the arguments for and against corporal punishment are:

• - For: Corporal punishment is a traditional and biblical method of discipline that teaches students to obey authority and follow rules. It is a quick and immediate way to correct bad behavior and prevent future problems. It is also a parental choice that should be respected by schools.
• - Against: Corporal punishment is a form of violence that can cause physical and psychological harm to students, such as bruises, injuries, low self-esteem, anxiety, depression, and aggression. It is also ineffective and counterproductive, as it does not address the root causes of misbehavior and may increase resentment and defiance. It is also a violation of human dignity and rights that should be protected by schools.

The use of corporal punishment in schools has declined significantly in recent years, as more states have banned it or allowed parents to opt out of it. A U.S. Education Department report found that the number of students who received corporal punishment dropped by more than one-third between the 2013-14 school year and the 2017-18 school year¹. In March 2023, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona urged governors and school leaders to ban corporal punishment in schools and replace it with evidence-based methods, such as positive behavioral interventions¹.

Bing, 9/20/2023

(1) Texas Education Code Section 37.0011 - Use of Corporal Punishment. https://texas.public.law/statutes/tex._educ._code_section_37.0011.

(2) Texas principal arrested after administering legal corporal punishment .... https://www.texastribune.org/2023/09/19/texas-principal-corporal-punishment/.

(3) Corporal punishment: when schools spank | GreatSchools.org. https://www.greatschools.org/gk/articles/corporal-punishment-when-schools-spank/.

OKLAHOMA'S MAD MAGA MONK'S PREEMPTIVE STRIKE AGAINST CHINESE CRITICAL RACE THEORY

OKLAHOMA'S MAD MAGA MONK'S PREEMPTIVE STRIKE AGAINST CHINESE CRITICAL RACE THEORY 

In a recent hearing, Oklahoma State Superintendent Ryan Walters, also known as the Mad Maga Monk of Oklahoma Education, spoke on behalf of the Koch Network and made some bold claims about Chinese influence in American schools. According to Walters, the Chinese government is actively running or ruining schools in the US, using a program called Confucius Classrooms as a front organization to spread communism. Walters went on to say that the Koch Network is totally different because they only spread fascism, not evil communism. He emphasized that they don't want anything in their schools that doesn't spread white Christian nationalism culture.

The Mad Monk claimed that he was only doing a preemptive strike on Chinese critical race theory. However, it seems like he was parroting the Koch Network front group Parents Defending Education's talking points almost verbatim. Walters demanded that nothing be taught in Oklahoma but MAGA culture and history.

The Confucius Classroom Program is a Chinese government initiative that promotes Chinese language and culture around the world. The program provides funding to schools and other institutions to establish Confucius Classrooms, which offer Chinese language and culture classes to students of all ages. The CCP has been controversial, with some critics arguing that it promotes Chinese propaganda and nationalism.

But let's be real here, the Mad Monk's claims are just plain ridiculous. The idea that the Chinese government is secretly infiltrating American schools to spread communism is straight out of a bad spy movie. And the idea that the Koch Network is any better because they only spread fascism is just laughable.

It's clear that the Mad Monk and his allies at Parents Defending Education are just trying to stir up controversy and push their own agenda. They want to ban anything that doesn't fit their narrow worldview, even if it means denying students the opportunity to learn about other cultures and perspectives.

But let's not forget that there are plenty of programs sponsored by the US government that promote language and culture learning in other countries. These programs are designed to foster cross-cultural understanding and friendship, not to spread propaganda or undermine other countries.

So let's all take a deep breath and remember that learning about other cultures and perspectives is a good thing. It helps us to understand and appreciate the world around us, and it makes us better global citizens. And if the Mad Monk and his allies can't see that, well, maybe they need to go back to school themselves.

Big Education Ape: OKLA SSPI RYAN WALTERS SAYS TULSA PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE LINKED TO CHINESE COMMUNIST https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2023/08/okla-sspi-ryan-walters-say-tulsa-public.html

'The Chinese Government Set Up In Schools To Spread Communism': Walters Testifies To US House Committee https://www.news9.com/story/650a0932b0c882040053f29f/the-chinese-government-set-up-in-schools-to-spread-communism:-walters-testifies-to-us-house-committee 

Little Red Classrooms - Parents Defending Education https://defendinged.org/investigations/little-red-classrooms-china-infiltration-of-american-k-12-schools/

'The Chinese Government Set Up In Schools To Spread Communism': Walters Testifies To US House Committee https://www.newson6.com/story/650a0932b0c882040053f29f/the-chinese-government-set-up-in-schools-to-spread-communism:-walters-testifies-to-us-house-committee 

THE DEFT DIVE

FROM BARD AI (UPDATED)

The Confucius Classroom Program (CCP) is a Chinese government initiative to promote Chinese language and culture around the world. It was established in 2004 by the Hanban, an affiliate of the Chinese Ministry of Education.

The CCP provides funding to schools and other institutions to establish Confucius Classrooms, which offer Chinese language and culture classes to students of all ages. Confucius Classrooms are typically staffed by Chinese teachers and offer a variety of courses, including Chinese language, Chinese culture, Chinese history, and Chinese art.

The CCP has been controversial, with some critics arguing that it is a form of Chinese soft power and that it promotes Chinese propaganda. However, supporters of the CCP argue that it is a valuable program that provides students with the opportunity to learn about Chinese language and culture.

**Deep Dive**

• The CCP has grown rapidly since its inception. In 2004, there were only 100 Confucius Classrooms worldwide. By 2023, there were over 5,000 Confucius Classrooms in over 150 countries.
• The CCP is funded by the Chinese government and by tuition fees from students. In 2018, the Chinese government spent $1.5 billion on the CCP.
• The CCP is administered by the Hanban, which is an affiliate of the Chinese Ministry of Education. The Hanban provides funding and support to Confucius Classrooms around the world.
• The CCP is staffed by Chinese teachers who are typically sent to Confucius Classrooms by the Chinese government. These teachers are responsible for teaching Chinese language and culture classes to students.
• Confucius Classrooms offer a variety of courses, including Chinese language, Chinese culture, Chinese history, and Chinese art. Some Confucius Classrooms also offer courses on Chinese business and economics.
• Confucius Classrooms are typically located in schools, universities, and cultural centers. They are open to students of all ages and backgrounds.

**Controversy**

• The CCP has been controversial since its inception. Some critics argue that it is a form of Chinese soft power and that it promotes Chinese propaganda. These critics point to the fact that the CCP is funded by the Chinese government and that Chinese teachers are typically sent to Confucius Classrooms by the Chinese government.
• Critics also argue that the CCP is used by the Chinese government to promote its own values and interests. For example, some Confucius Classrooms have been accused of promoting Chinese nationalism and of censoring information about China's human rights record.
• Supporters of the CCP argue that it is a valuable program that provides students with the opportunity to learn about Chinese language and culture. They argue that the CCP is not a form of Chinese propaganda and that it does not promote Chinese nationalism.
• Supporters of the CCP also argue that the CCP is important for promoting mutual understanding between China and the rest of the world. They argue that the CCP helps to build bridges between China and other countries and that it promotes cultural exchange.

**Conclusion**

• The CCP is a complex and controversial program. It is important to be aware of the potential risks and benefits of the CCP before deciding whether or not to participate in the program.
• If you are considering participating in the CCP, it is important to do your research and to choose a Confucius Classroom that is reputable and that offers a high-quality curriculum. It is also important to be aware of the potential for Chinese government interference in the CCP.
• If you are a student who is considering taking classes at a Confucius Classroom, it is important to be critical of the information that you are presented with. It is also important to be aware of the potential for censorship and to seek out information from a variety of sources.

FROM BING AI

The Confucius Classroom program is a global initiative that aims to promote Chinese language and culture in foreign primary and secondary schools. The program is sponsored by the Chinese government and affiliated with the Confucius Institute, which operates in universities and colleges around the world. The program provides funding, resources, teachers, and curriculum support to local schools that want to offer Chinese language and culture courses to their students. The program also facilitates cultural exchanges and sister school relationships between schools in China and other countries.

The Confucius Classroom program has been praised for its benefits in enhancing students' intercultural competence, global awareness, and career opportunities. Some of the benefits of the program are:

• - It offers students a chance to learn one of the most widely spoken languages in the world, which can open up new possibilities for communication, travel, and work.
• - It exposes students to the rich and diverse aspects of Chinese culture, such as history, literature, art, music, philosophy, and traditions.
• - It fosters students' curiosity and appreciation for other cultures and perspectives, which can help them develop critical thinking and empathy skills.
• - It encourages students to participate in various activities and events that showcase their learning achievements and celebrate cultural diversity.
• - It connects students with peers and teachers from different backgrounds and countries, which can enhance their cross-cultural understanding and friendship.

However, the Confucius Classroom program has also been criticized for its controversies in terms of its influence, transparency, and academic freedom. Some of the controversies of the program are:

• - It is seen as a tool of soft power by the Chinese government, which aims to shape the perceptions and opinions of foreign audiences in favor of China's interests and values.
• - It is accused of censoring or omitting topics that are sensitive or critical of the Chinese government, such as human rights, democracy, Tibet, Taiwan, Xinjiang, and Hong Kong.
• - It is suspected of interfering with the academic autonomy and integrity of the host institutions, by imposing restrictions on hiring, curriculum, research, and events.
• - It is alleged of spying on or influencing students, teachers, and administrators who are involved in the program or who express views that are contrary to the Chinese government's stance.
• The Confucius Classroom program is a complex and controversial phenomenon that has both positive and negative impacts on education and society. It is important for students, teachers, parents, and policymakers to be aware of the benefits and challenges of the program, and to make informed decisions based on evidence and dialogue. 

Bing, 9/19/2023

• (1) Confucius Classrooms | Confucius Institute of the State of Washington .... https://www.plu.edu/confucius-institute/past-programs/confucius-classrooms/.
• (2) . https://bing.com/search?q=confucius+classroom+program.
• (3) The Confucius Classroom Conundrum | Opinion - Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/confucius-classroom-conundrum-opinion-1577492.
• (4) Confucius Institute - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confucius_Institute.
• (5) Confucius Classrooms - Confucius Institute of Southern Kentucky. http://ciwky.org/confucius-classrooms/.
• (6) undefined. https://china.usc.edu/confucius-institutes-united-states.
• (7) Confucius Institutes: The growth of China's controversial ... - BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-49511231.
• (8) . https://bing.com/search?q=confucius+classroom+program+controversy.
• (9) Why are Confucius Institutes closing? - The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/08/24/state-department-labeled-chinas-confucius-programs-bad-influence-us-students-whats-story/.
• (10) Confucius Institutes in the United States: Selected Issues - CRS Reports. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11180.
• (11) New Confucius classroom benefits high school students. https://confucius-institute.centre.uq.edu.au/article/2016/10/new-confucius-classroom-benefits-high-school-students.
• (12) . https://bing.com/search?q=confucius+classroom+program+benefits.
• (13) undefined. https://www.voanews.com/a/controversial-confucius-institutes-returning-to-u-s-schools-under-new-name/6635906.html.
• (14) undefined. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/its-time-for-a-new-policy-on-confucius-institutes/.
• (15) undefined. https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-are-confucius-institutes-and-do-they-teach-chinese-propaganda-114274.

Yes, the U.S. government offers various programs that aim to promote language and culture learning in countries outside the U.S. Some of these programs are:

• - The Critical Language Scholarship (CLS) program, which provides overseas foreign language instruction and cultural immersion experiences for American undergraduate and graduate students in fifteen critical need languages².
• - The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) programs, which offer full scholarships for American high school students to study abroad on cultural and educational exchange programs³.
• - The Office of English Language Programs (ELP), which designs and manages programs to support the teaching of English in countries around the world through local American Embassies and Consulates⁴.

These programs are part of the U.S. government's initiative to expand the number of Americans studying and mastering foreign languages that are critical to our national security and prosperity, as well as to foster cross-cultural understanding and friendship.

 Bing, 9/19/2023

• (1) Critical Language Scholarship Program | Exchange Programs. https://exchanges.state.gov/cls.
• (2) Program: Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs. https://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/non-public-education/other-federal-programs/dos.html.
• (3) Office of English Language Programs | Bureau of Educational and .... https://eca.state.gov/about-bureau/organizational-structure/office-english-language-programs.
• (4) All Language Programs | Critical Languages. https://studyabroad.state.gov/languages/all-programs.

Parents Defending Education (PDE) is a right-leaning organization that opposes the teaching of critical race theory and related left-progressive ideology in K-12 public schools¹. According to its website, PDE was founded in 2021 by Nicole Neily, a former executive director of the Koch-backed Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity².

PDE does not disclose its donors, but some of its funding sources have been revealed by investigative reports and public records. According to a commentary by the Portland Press Herald, PDE raised almost $3.2 million in 2021, and some of its major donors were⁵:

• - Donors Trust, a dark money operation associated with the Koch network, donated more than $20,000.
• - The Achelis & Bodman Foundation, which funds voucher and charter school programs and targets public education, contributed $25,000.
• - Searle Freedom Trust, another right-wing donor with ties to Donors Trust, contributed $250,000.

Another report by Mass Politics Profs found that PDE has connections to other Koch-backed groups, such as the Independent Women's Forum and the State Policy Network⁸. PDE also shares staff and board members with these groups, such as Asra Nomani, who is a senior fellow at the Independent Women's Forum and a board member of PDE⁸.

PDE is part of a larger network of conservative groups that are carrying out a campaign to ban books from school libraries, often focused on works that address race, LGBTQ issues or marginalized communities⁷. Some of these groups include Moms for Liberty, No Left Turn in Education, and the National School Choice Week. These groups are often linked to deep-pocketed rightwing donors, such as the DeVos family, the Walton family, and the Bradley Foundation⁷⁹.

PDE has also filed racism complaints with the U.S. Department of Education against several school districts that have supposedly admitted to engaging in “systemic racism”¹. PDE claims that such admissions violate the 1964 Civil Rights Act and make the districts ineligible for federal funds¹. PDE also opposes masking policies, remote learning, and evidence-based curricula that it dislikes¹.

PDE provides parents with step-by-step guides to ask questions of school board members and school administrators and instructs them on writing op-eds and on how to talk to the media¹. It also provides templates for parents to file Freedom of Information Act requests, a guide to parents’ rights, organizing strategies, and talking points¹. PDE says its goal is to “empower, expose and engage” parents to combat critical race theory and other indoctrination in schools¹. The organization’s website includes an “IndoctriNation Map,” allowing parents to look up school districts and “learn about parents organizations, incidents and FOIAs”¹.

Bing, 9/19/2023

• (1) Many “Parent” Groups Opposing Masks and CRT Are Actually ... - Truthout. https://truthout.org/articles/many-parent-groups-opposing-masks-and-crt-are-actually-driven-by-dark-money/.
• (2) Parents Defending Education - InfluenceWatch. https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/parents-defending-education/.
• (3) Commentary: Parents Defending Education is not at all what it says it is. https://www.pressherald.com/2023/01/18/commentary-parents-defending-education-has-a-lot-of-explaining-to-do/.
• (4) Koch Connections and Sham Grassroots of Parents Defending Education. https://www.masspoliticsprofs.org/2021/04/12/koch-connections-and-sham-grassroots-of-parents-defending-education/.
• (5) US conservatives linked to rich donors wage campaign to ban books from .... https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jan/24/us-conservatives-campaign-books-ban-schools.
• (6) undefined. https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/who-behind-attacks-educators-and-public-schools.
• (7) Parents Defending Education Action. https://actionpde.org/.
• (8) undefined. https://defendinged.org/.
• (9) . https://bing.com/search?q=Parents+Defending+Education+donors.