Latest News and Comment from Education

Friday, April 22, 2016

How Undocumented Students Are Turned Away From Public Schools - NEA Today

How Undocumented Students Are Turned Away From Public Schools - NEA Today:

How Undocumented Students Are Turned Away From Public Schools

undocumented students public schools
In the landmark 1982 decision in Plyler v Doe, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled all children are entitled to a public education, regardless of citizenship or immigration status. The fact that this is established law hasn’t stopped some states and school districts from imposing numerous obstacles that have prevented many undocumented students living in the United States (approximately 750,000) from registering for school. The scope of the efforts to block this fundamental right is the focus of a new report published by the Georgetown University Law Center’s Human Rights Institute and the Women’s Refugee Commission.
“U.S. law is clear on this point – no child in the United States should be excluded from public education,” said Mikaela Harris, a Georgetown Law student and co-author ofEnsuring Every Undocumented Student Succeeds, “What we found is that that doesn’t always play out in practice.”
The researchers spent one year examining the practices and policies in school districts in Georgia, New York, but most closely in North Carolina and Texas. They interviewed government and school officials and families with undocumented children to determine how some communities, according to the report, “have barred immigrant children from enrolling or meaningfully participating in school by creating intentional and unintentional barriers.”  In some schools, students are turned away outright; in others, they are “discouraged” from enrolling.
But, as one social service provider told the researchers, “there is a fine line between discouraging and denying enrollment.”
The recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) raids to detain and deport families who crossed the border in 2014 has fostered a climate of fear and anxiety that has prevented many children from even attempting the school enrollment process.
The families who do make this effort routinely face a wall of obstacles, ranging from delays over complicated paperwork to being turned away from classrooms as the result of a districts’ arbitrary – and usually erroneous – interpretations of residency rules and state laws. Meanwhile, a lack of translation and interpretation services leave families helpless and uninformed about the enrollment process.
The researchers interviewed “Juan,” a 16-year-old who fled violence in Honduras to travel alone to Texas. Attempting to enroll, he was initially turned away by the school principal, who believed Juan would not pass the state test. Fortunately, the teenager had a community advocate by his side who could speak on his behalf. Juan was soon admitted, although he quickly discovered that the school was ill-equipped to provide the kind of one-on-one support he desperately needed.
Support Immigrant and Refugee Students: How are the raids and current immigration policies affecting your school community? Take the pledge and share your story.
The reluctance to enroll undocumented students out of concern that they will drag down the school’s performance on statewide standardized tests is prevalent in some of the communities profiled in the report. One 17 year-old student recounted to the researchers that she was told that she could not start school until How Undocumented Students Are Turned Away From Public Schools - NEA Today:


Public Schools Belong to the People—Not Just Mayors, CEOs, or the President

Public Schools Belong to the People—Not Just Mayors, CEOs, or the President:

Public Schools Belong to the People—Not Just Mayors, CEOs, or the President

Business man holding a card with you're fired text
In Chicago, Troy LaRaviere has been fired from his principal position at Blaine Elementary School, partly because he sided with parents against high-stakes testing. Those who fondly regarded the outspoken administrator were stunned to learn of his ousting by mail. LaRaviere has been critical of Mayor Rahm Emanuel and others in the school system.
I’d like to know why parents were not given some say into such a drastic firing decision. Why weren’t they included in the discussion concerning his behavior? Was it because all the parents would have cheered for LaRaviere?
LaRaviere recently stood alongside and in support of Sen. Bernie Sanders with parents and students, before the Illinois Democratic primary. Sanders has condemned LaRaviere’s removal.
Troy LaRaviere is also running to take over the Chicago Principals and Administrators Association labor group. Here you can read more about why this might be a concern for school reformers who are becoming increasingly more unpopular.
Troy LaRaviere has spoken out against the establishment and on behalf of children. He  read more: Public Schools Belong to the People—Not Just Mayors, CEOs, or the President:


Mr. Duncan's Sad Legacy - Rick Hess Straight Up - Education Week

Mr. Duncan's Sad Legacy - Rick Hess Straight Up - Education Week:
Mr. Duncan's Sad Legacy

On Monday, former Secretary of Education Arne Duncan returned to Washington DC to speak at a Georgetown University conference. Trailing a wake of failed initiatives and toxic politics, Duncan once more leapt at the chance to impugn the motives of those who disagree with him on questions of education policy. Eager to justify his refusal to feel unduly bound by federal law, Duncan said of the lawmakers who wrote the Every Student Succeeds Act, "Without naming names of senators, how many times do you hear them talk about kids . . . about African-American kids, and Latino kids, and special needs kids and English-language learners?" He said, "We can have honest debate on lots of things but where is your heart coming from? What's your true motivation? I doubt the motivations of some."
Well. One thing I've learned during a quarter-century in education is that there is no value in attacking one another's motives. It's a dead end and a recipe for destructive division. Indeed, the notion that we should only engage those whose motives pass a litmus test shows a disturbing ignorance about how democratic government works. Free nations rest upon the capacity of reasonable people to disagree about important things. Serious people understand that debates over federal education policy reflect honest disagreement about what government can do, should do, and how to go about it—and not just who cares about kids. If you don't accept that, the rationale for democratic government crumples. If you're sure you are good and your opponents are evil, then your obligation is to impose your will—the law be damned.
That brings us back to Mr. Duncan. While I deplore much of what he did during his tenure at the Education Department and think he did some real harm while in office, I observed upon his departure last fall that, "I grant his sincerity, even as I profoundly disagree with much that he did . . . He strikes me as a good man who took on a demanding job and did it in the best way he knew how. By all accounts, he was good to his colleagues and subordinates, and a beacon of personal integrity. That counts for a lot." 
Mr. Duncan never granted that same courtesy or respect to those who disagreed with him. Taken with his own virtue, Duncan has blithely treated all but his yes-men and fellow travelers with disdain. As Secretary, in 2013, Duncan told the American Society of Newspaper Editors that concerns about the Common Core were solely the product of a lunatic "fringe." He famously belittled the concerns of "white suburban moms" for fearing the Common Core because it would reveal that "their child isn't as brilliant as they thought they were." He dismissed Republican concerns about Obama's preschool proposals as "morally indefensible" and tantamount "education malpractice"—and then later expressed bewilderment at his trouble drumming up GOP support. He insisted he had no choice but to issue waivers from No Child Left Behind because Congress wouldn't do its job, and then did his best to sabotage Congress's efforts to reauthorize the law.
Those convinced that they really care and uniquely get it can find it easy to dismiss any disagreement or concern as a sign that others just don't. It doesn't help that Duncan spent the better part of a decade surrounded by sycophants who seemingly shared his belief that he possessed a singular concern for the nation's kids—and courtiers who were only too happy to sing his praises in pursuit of access or funding, as long as he shared their priorities.
Fast forward to Monday, when Duncan was asked if he would apologize for having asserted, on his way out of office, that the Every Student Succeeds Act wouldn't limit the Department of Education in practice because, "Candidly, our lawyers are much smarter than many of the folks who were working on this bill." In his response, Duncan was initially scornful, saying, "My one sentence is that important? Are you kidding me?" He then flippantly allowed, "I'm happy to apologize, happy to do whatever, you know." Finally, he added, "Let's get to work." One cannot help but reflect how much more compelling Duncan's "apology" would have been had he not simultaneously announced that some of those he wants to work with are unnamed bigots of suspect motivation.
While in office, aided by billions of stimulus dollars, his NCLB "waivers," and some off-the-leash lawyers, Duncan operated more like a Chicago pol than the U.S. Secretary of Education. He sabotaged trust in the executive branch's commitment to the law of the land and the Constitution. He helped turn teacher evaluation and common standards from sensible ideas into rushed, clumsy, and divisive litmus tests. He brought the snippy partisanship of Chicago to America's educational conversation and casually cast aspersions on the judgment or motives of those who disagreed with him.
Since 2009, Arne Duncan has done more than anyone to inject into education the distrust, divisiveness, and indecency of contemporary American politics. He came to office backed by bipartisan goodwill—at Duncan's confirmation hearing, Senator Lamar Alexander said that president-elect Obama had "made several distinguished Cabinet appointments" but "I think you are the best" of them—and cavalierly did his best to fracture it. He politicized nearly all that he touched. He shows no understanding of any of this, much less any hint of remorse. I am through granting him the presumption of goodwill that he denies to others.  
In Shakespeare's Macbeth, when reporting that Cawdor died with honor, Malcolm observes, "Nothing in his life became him like the leaving it." It's too bad that Mr. Duncan didn't figure this out regarding his own departure from public office. Instead of magnanimity, reflection, or statesmanship, he's opted for bluster and braggadocio. As for Mr. Duncan's belated and insincere "apology," he can keep it. He's done enough harm. I can only hope that, at long last, he will take his certitude and self-righteous meanness back to the streets of Chicago.Mr. Duncan's Sad Legacy - Rick Hess Straight Up - Education Week:










Thursday, April 21, 2016

BATS: Cultural Competence in the Classroom and Beyond #NPE16NC

BATS: Cultural Competence in the Classroom and Beyond on Vimeo:

BATS: Cultural Competence in the Classroom and Beyond



 BATS: Cultural Competence in the Classroom and Beyond on Vimeo:





Schoolhouse Live’s Videos on Vimeo http://bit.ly/23QZi8f
 Vincent Precht http://bit.ly/1GwPEPv




 LIVE STREAM FOOTAGE FROM THE NETWORK FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION 
NATIONAL CONFERENCE MORE ARCHIVAL FOOTAGE TO COME!

Big Education Ape: Educators at Raleigh NPE conference condemn HB2 | News & Observer #NPE16NChttp://bit.ly/1Snl9lP
Live From Raleigh, North Carolina: NPE’s 3rd Annual National Conference Complete interactive schedule http://bit.ly/20LAehc
Big Education Ape: Video: Saturday at NPE’s 3rd Annual National Conference #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/1SnHj7f
Big Education Ape: Karran Harper Royal and Jesse Hagopian at the NPE National Conference on Vimeo http://bit.ly/1YDW2JM
Big Education Ape: Anthony Cody Interviews Mary Cathryn Ricker, AFT VP and Becky Pringle, NEA VP #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/23QZRPn
Big Education Ape: Opt-Out Conscientious Objectors #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/1MGcTuK

What’s Next in the Education Reform Wars? A Spirited Conversation between Jennifer Berkshire (EduShyster) and Peter Cunningham #NPE16NC

What’s Next in the Education Reform Wars? A Spirited Conversation between Jennifer Berkshire (EduShyster) and Peter Cunningham, on Vimeo:

What’s Next in the Education Reform Wars? A Spirited Conversation between Jennifer Berkshire (EduShyster) and Peter Cunningham,



What’s Next in the Education Reform Wars? A Spirited Conversation between Jennifer Berkshire (EduShyster) and Peter Cunningham, on Vimeo:



Schoolhouse Live’s Videos on Vimeo http://bit.ly/23QZi8f
 Vincent Precht http://bit.ly/1GwPEPv





 LIVE STREAM FOOTAGE FROM THE NETWORK FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION 
NATIONAL CONFERENCE MORE ARCHIVAL FOOTAGE TO COME!

Big Education Ape: Educators at Raleigh NPE conference condemn HB2 | News & Observer #NPE16NChttp://bit.ly/1Snl9lP
Live From Raleigh, North Carolina: NPE’s 3rd Annual National Conference Complete interactive schedule http://bit.ly/20LAehc
Big Education Ape: Video: Saturday at NPE’s 3rd Annual National Conference #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/1SnHj7f
Big Education Ape: Karran Harper Royal and Jesse Hagopian at the NPE National Conference on Vimeo http://bit.ly/1YDW2JM
Big Education Ape: Anthony Cody Interviews Mary Cathryn Ricker, AFT VP and Becky Pringle, NEA VP #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/23QZRPn
Big Education Ape: Opt-Out Conscientious Objectors #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/1MGcTuK

Teachers Talk Back: Teacher Evaluation Report #NPE16NC

Teachers Talk Back: Teacher Evaluation Report on Vimeo:

Teachers Talk Back: Teacher Evaluation Report

Teachers Talk Back: Teacher Evaluation Report on Vimeo:



Schoolhouse Live’s Videos on Vimeo http://bit.ly/23QZi8f
 Vincent Precht http://bit.ly/1GwPEPv



 LIVE STREAM FOOTAGE FROM THE NETWORK FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION 
NATIONAL CONFERENCE MORE ARCHIVAL FOOTAGE TO COME!



Big Education Ape: Educators at Raleigh NPE conference condemn HB2 | News & Observer #NPE16NChttp://bit.ly/1Snl9lP
Live From Raleigh, North Carolina: NPE’s 3rd Annual National Conference Complete interactive schedule http://bit.ly/20LAehc
Big Education Ape: Video: Saturday at NPE’s 3rd Annual National Conference #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/1SnHj7f
Big Education Ape: Karran Harper Royal and Jesse Hagopian at the NPE National Conference on Vimeo http://bit.ly/1YDW2JM
Big Education Ape: Anthony Cody Interviews Mary Cathryn Ricker, AFT VP and Becky Pringle, NEA VP #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/23QZRPn
Big Education Ape: Opt-Out Conscientious Objectors #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/1MGcTuK

Outspoken CPS principal known as Emanuel critic ousted from Lakeview school - Chicago Tribune

Outspoken CPS principal known as Emanuel critic ousted from Lakeview school - Chicago Tribune:
Outspoken CPS principal known as Emanuel critic ousted from Lakeview school

 An outspoken Chicago Public Schools principal was ousted from his Lakeview school on Wednesday, as school officials investigated unspecified "alleged acts of misconduct."
Troy LaRaviere, principal of Blaine Elementary School, has established a reputation as a frequent public critic of Mayor Rahm Emanuel and the school system. LaRaviere has also opposed the controversial Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers exam — known as PARCC.
Those actions led the Chicago Board of Education to discipline LaRaviere last summer, when the board approved a "warning resolution" that censured LaRaviere and laid ground for his dismissal if he didn't change his conduct.
"CPS has removed Troy LaRaviere because of alleged acts of misconduct, including violations of a previous Warning Resolution passed by the Board of Education," district spokeswoman Emily Bittner said in a statement. "A hearing will be held to determine his employment status."
The school board's action was partly linked to LaRaviere's opposition to the standardized test, and a confrontation the principal had with former interim CPS CEO and school board Vice President Jesse Ruiz. It also came months after LaRaviere served as an education adviser and supporter of Cook County Commissioner Jesus "Chuy" Garcia, who launched an unsuccessful bid to unseat Mayor Rahm Emanuel.
The district said LaRaviere has been removed from the school, and that he will receive a "pre-suspension hearing" to determine if there is basis to suspend him without pay pending a hearing with the Illinois State Board of Education.
In messages to the Tribune, LaRaviere said CPS notified him of his job status in a letter on Wednesday but that "no reason was provided" for his removal.
"I got the letter right after they attempted to shut down a meeting I was scheduled to have with principals at a (South Side) elementary school," LaRaviere told the Tribune. "They said it was 'an illegal meeting' because they thought it was regarding the privatization of engineers through an Emanuel campaign contributor."
LaRaviere referred to a recent CPS plan to respond to complaints about unclean buildings by doubling the size of a maintenance program run by a firm partly controlled by formerNBA superstar Earvin "Magic" Johnson, a financial supporter of Emanuel. The district plans to expand the maintenance program across the city, which would affect hundreds of building engineers covered by a CPS labor contract that expires in June. Read More: Outspoken CPS principal known as Emanuel critic ousted from Lakeview school - Chicago Tribune:

Students have no ‘right’ to quality education, state court rules - SFGate

Students have no ‘right’ to quality education, state court rules - SFGate:
Students have no ‘right’ to quality education, state court rules


A divided state appeals court ruled Wednesday that California’s anemic level of school funding does not violate students’ constitutional right to an education of “some quality” because no such right exists.
The 2-1 decision by the First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco upheld a judge’s dismissal of a suit filed by some of the state’s major participants in public education — school boards and administrators, the California Teachers Association and State PTA, and nine school districts, including San Francisco and Alameda. The plaintiffs argued that a state that trails nearly every other state in per-pupil spending, staffing and student achievement violates California’s 1879 constitutional guarantee of a school system that encourages “the promotion of intellectual ... improvement.”
Similar suits have been filed in other states, and a majority have been successful, with courts in at least six states finding that their school finance systems violated students’ rights. Last year, the Washington state Supreme Court held its Legislature in contempt for failing to increase funding and imposed a fine of $100,000 a day, which is still in effect.
But the San Francisco court said the right to a public education, guaranteed by the California Constitution, does not include a right to any particular level of educational quality or funding.
An education of “some quality,” the standard asserted by the plaintiffs in the suit, is “good public policy,” Justice Martin Jenkins said in the majority opinion. But he said the state Constitution’s provisions “leave the difficult and policy-laden questions associated with educational adequacy and funding to the legislative branch,” not the courts.
The state Supreme Court first declared education to be a fundamental right in a 1971 ruling that struck down a statewide school financing system based on unequal local property taxes. But Jenkins, quoting that ruling, said the high court had found no constitutional requirement for the Legislature to fund schools “at some magic level to produce either an adequate-quality educational program or a high-quality educational program.”
In dissent, Justice Stuart Pollak said the constitutional mandate of a public school system “implies the need to maintain public schools at some minimum level of competence” — just like a criminal defendant’s constitutional right to a lawyer includes a right of effective legal representation. He said the courts could simply find that the current system falls short of the constitutional standard and leave the solution to lawmakers, with judicial oversight.
Pollak cited the plaintiffs’ evidence that California, in recent years, ranked 47th in the nation in per-pupil spending, 47th or lower in school staffing, and near the bottom in reading and math tests and high school graduation rates. The state, with more than 6 million public school students, plunged from the top to the bottom of national ranking after passage of the Proposition 13 property tax cut in 1978 and subsequent reductions in state spending.
The plaintiffs will ask the state Supreme Court to review the case, said attorney John Affeldt of the nonprofit Public Advocates. He said the court has already determined that the right to an education should enable students to graduate with the knowledge and skills needed to participate in the economy and democracy, and should take up the case “to enforce the right to a quality education.”
The ruling comes six days after an appellate court in Los Angeles upheld state laws on teacher tenure and seniority, overturning a judge’s ruling that found the laws saddled poor and minority students with incompetent teachers and violated the right to educational equality. The plaintiffs plan to appeal that ruling to the state Supreme Court.
Bob Egelko is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: begelko@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @egelko
View the decision at http://bit.ly/schoolsruling.

Want Your Kids to Get a Good Education? Support Their Teachers’ Workplace Rights | The Nation

Want Your Kids to Get a Good Education? Support Their Teachers’ Workplace Rights | The Nation:
Want Your Kids to Get a Good Education? Support Their Teachers’ Workplace Rights
A new lawsuit pits teachers’ rights against students’ access to quality education. That argument doesn’t hold water.


 Sixty years after Brown v. Board of Education enshrined the promise of educational equality as a constitutional right, the question of “separate but equal” in public schools has resurfaced, in a lawsuit that attempts to pit teachers’ labor rights against children’s rights to fair educational access.

When education reformers go after teachers’ labor protections, their seemingly morally unassailable line of attack is, “But what about the children?” It’s an alluring idea—don’t all children deserve a good education?—wrapped around apernicious attack on labor rights: less union protection, ergo more “meritocracy” allowed to flourish in the education workforce. Labor advocates, however, challenge the reformers’ seemingly pro-student rationale with a more expansive definition of civil rights in schools: making a school community equitable and inclusive is a democratic project, not a mere matter of supply and demand.
A California Appeals Court recently struck down the central argumentadvanced by reform advocates backing the suit, called Vergara v. California: that California’s tenure policies—which afford a high level of job protection for teachers with seniority status—are unfair and discriminatory, because theyprotect “grossly ineffective” teachers and promote the clustering of “bad” teachers in poorer schools, with disproportionate impacts on poor students and students of color.“The challenged statutes do not inevitably lead to the assignment of more inexperienced teachers to schools serving poor and minority children,” the Court ruled. While “ineffective teachers” (according to the controversial statistical modeling Students Matter applies) were a problem, the judges acknowledged, this was not solely, or even primarily, the product of tenure policies.
The California Teachers Association argues that tenure protects due process, designed not to protect “bad” teachers, but to ensure “stability” and integrity in hiring and firing decisions. Their defense challenges a neoliberal reformist mentality that champions charter schools and other private-sector “solutions” to problems ascribed to publicly controlled institutions. This framework is driving a nationwide legal attack on collective bargaining rights, giving rise to Vergara-esque litigation attacking tenure policies in Minnesota and New York, featuring mediagenic young plaintiffs backed by well-heeled reform outfitsWant Your Kids to Get a Good Education? Support Their Teachers’ Workplace Rights | The Nation:


Wednesday, April 20, 2016

A Community Based Approach to Reversing Resegregation #NPE16NC

A Community Based Approach to Reversing Resegregation on Vimeo:
A Community Based Approach to Reversing Resegregation


Schoolhouse Live’s Videos on Vimeo http://bit.ly/23QZi8f
 Vincent Precht http://bit.ly/1GwPEPv


 LIVE STREAM FOOTAGE FROM THE NETWORK FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION 
NATIONAL CONFERENCE MORE ARCHIVAL FOOTAGE TO COME!


Big Education Ape: Educators at Raleigh NPE conference condemn HB2 | News & Observer #NPE16NChttp://bit.ly/1Snl9lP
Live From Raleigh, North Carolina: NPE’s 3rd Annual National Conference Complete interactive schedule http://bit.ly/20LAehc
Big Education Ape: Video: Saturday at NPE’s 3rd Annual National Conference #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/1SnHj7f
Big Education Ape: Karran Harper Royal and Jesse Hagopian at the NPE National Conference on Vimeo http://bit.ly/1YDW2JM
Big Education Ape: Anthony Cody Interviews Mary Cathryn Ricker, AFT VP and Becky Pringle, NEA VP #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/23QZRPn
Big Education Ape: Opt-Out Conscientious Objectors #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/1MGcTuK

Testing and Justice: Growing Gaps, Shrinking Opportunity in Public Education #NPE16NC

Testing and Justice: Growing Gaps, Shrinking Opportunity in Public Education on Vimeo:
Testing and Justice: Growing Gaps, Shrinking Opportunity in Public Education


Schoolhouse Live’s Videos on Vimeo http://bit.ly/23QZi8f
From Vincent Precht and SCHOOLHOUSE LIVE
California Father

Thank You Vincent Precht For the Wonderful Coverage
Of the NPE Conference in  Raleigh, North Carolina
I am a teacher, writer, filmmaker and live streamer. I have produced live stream events for United Opt Out featuring addresses by Diane Ravitch and Karen Lewis and am making a documentary, which includes interviews with Noam Chomsky, Jesse Hagopian and many others. Published in the New York Times, Seattle Review, TriQuarterly and elsewhere, I have written award winning short stories. I have been a public school teacher for 29 years. The biggest moments of my life were having a son and 40 years earlier meeting the Beatles.

Vincent Precht http://bit.ly/1GwPEPv
 LIVE STREAM FOOTAGE FROM THE NETWORK FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION 
NATIONAL CONFERENCE MORE ARCHIVAL FOOTAGE TO COME!

Big Education Ape: Educators at Raleigh NPE conference condemn HB2 | News & Observer #NPE16NChttp://bit.ly/1Snl9lP
Live From Raleigh, North Carolina: NPE’s 3rd Annual National Conference Complete interactive schedule http://bit.ly/20LAehc
Big Education Ape: Video: Saturday at NPE’s 3rd Annual National Conference #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/1SnHj7f
Big Education Ape: Karran Harper Royal and Jesse Hagopian at the NPE National Conference on Vimeo http://bit.ly/1YDW2JM
Big Education Ape: Anthony Cody Interviews Mary Cathryn Ricker, AFT VP and Becky Pringle, NEA VP #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/23QZRPn
Big Education Ape: Opt-Out Conscientious Objectors #NPE16NC http://bit.ly/1MGcTuK

Head of the Nation's Largest Teachers' Union: "The Future of Everything" Hinges on 2016

Head of the Nation's Largest Teachers' Union: "The Future of Everything" Hinges on 2016:

Head of the Nation's Largest Teachers' Union: "The Future of Everything" Hinges on 2016

With the national debate over education as contentious as ever, Lily Eskelsen Garcia, president of the National Education Association, the largest labor union in the country, is poised to play a major role in that raging debate. 
The NEA represents 3 million instructors at the elementary and secondary school levels, as well as higher education faculty, "education support professionals, school administrators, retired educators and students preparing to become teachers."
During an interview with Mic, Eskelsen Garcia — the first Latina to lead the NEA — spoke passionately about how education affects the life of the nation in terms of the economy and social justice — and who she thinks would do the best job.
(The questions and responses in this transcript have been edited for brevity and clarity.)
Mic: I understand you're supporting Hillary Clinton for president. Why?
Lily Eskelsen Garcia: What impressed us with Hillary Clinton was her lifelong commitment to children and education as a social justice issue. It's amazing just to look at this race, because you look at the Republican side and who's left standing, and for us it's really quite frightening, because [of] the whole blame game of "If there's anything wrong with the world, it's because of teachers, it's because of public education." You don't like the weather, you know, blame your third-grade teacher for it. 
So they have these very unsophisticated lines that they'll throw out, and we know part of that obviously is to detract from the agenda that we have. And the agenda that we have is to support elected officials — local school board members, your governor, your senators and the president of the United States. Everyone has a little bit of something to do with what's going to happen for that student. Whether that's whether they have access to preschool or access to higher education. 


Head of the Nation's Largest Teachers' Union: "The Future of Everything" Hinges on 2016
Source: Mike Groll/AP
So for us — and because you mentioned the social justice aspect of education — we've hit a horrible milestone: Last year, for the first time in the history of this country, the majority, 51% of American public school students, qualified for free or reduced lunch, which means they come from financially struggling families. It could look on the outside like a perfectly nice middle-class family whose mom lost her job or whose dad is working two jobs at minimum wage, who haven't had a raise for five or six years, and so they can't keep up with putting gas in the car. They might still have a car, but they can't put gas in it. 
What happens in that school is the ultimate community social justice cause, and we take politics very seriously, because politicians have so much to say about what we'll be able to do for our students."
Ted Cruz's wife, Heidi, has said one of her top issues would be school choice if she became first lady. That means vouchers
LEG: You have such a divide: Here's the interesting part. You know, on the Republican side, it's all about privatize, standardize, de-professionalize. How do we get cheaper teachers in there and then get them out before you have to pay them too much. In the marketplace, [regarding vouchers], wealthier families will subsidize that and other families will not be able to do that. So Read more: Head of the Nation's Largest Teachers' Union: "The Future of Everything" Hinges on 2016: