Latest News and Comment from Education

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: PARENT ENGAGEMENT

Mike Klonsky's SmallTalk Blog: PARENT ENGAGEMENT:

PARENT ENGAGEMENT


CPS parent volunteers
Latest from CPS -- All parent school volunteers will now be required to be fingerprinted. Accurate Biometrics has been given the $650,000 contract (no board approval required) to do the fingerprinting and parents will have to travel to one of their four centers in the city to have it done. 

According to Brother Fred
Accurate Biometrics' President is Peggy Critchfield. Her previous experience in security work was running the ice pro shop at Marshall Fields. She was Marshall Field's crystal buyer before that. Her other major client is Teach for America.
When asked if parents would also be required to assume the position and take the perp walk? CPS Liar-in-Chief Becky Carroll offered no comment.

ELECTION NOTES

Yes, election victories are possible even in this era of Citizens United, ALEC, the Koch Bros. and Bloomberg billions. Aside from the de Blasio landslide victory in New York, there was the victory of the grassroots school board campaign in Bridgeport. The campaign, led by theWorking Families Party, won out over the corporate-backed forces who were pushing a 

'Nation's Report Card': Who Cares? If you fix some of these numbers maybe the other numbers will mean something!



Per Student Public Education Spending Decreases in 2011 for First Time in Nearly Four Decades, Census Bureau Reports

Note: This is a revised release due to two changes. The embedded map incorrectly had Wyoming as spending more than $16,000 and the District of Columbia spending less than $16,000. The map was corrected to reflect the true spending for Wyoming ($15,849) and the District of Columbia ($18,475).
There was also a calculation error for the 100 largest school districts, sorted by per student spending. The calculation was for the 50 largest school districts, and incorrectly stated that it was the 100 largest school districts. The original order would be true for the 50 largest school systems: New York City School District ($19,770), Baltimore City Public Schools in Maryland ($15,483), Montgomery County Public Schools in Maryland ($15,421), Milwaukee Public Schools in Wisconsin ($14,244) and Prince George's County Public Schools in Maryland ($13,775).
Fiscal year 2011 marked the first decrease in per student public education spending since the U.S. Census Bureau began collecting data on an annual basis in 1977, according to new statistics released today (dollars not adjusted for inflation). The 50 states and the District of Columbia spent $10,560 per student in 2011, down 0.4 percent from 2010. The top spenders were New York ($19,076), the District of Columbia ($18,475), Alaska ($16,674), New Jersey ($15,968) and Vermont ($15,925).
Public Elementary-Secondary School System Per Pupil Current Spending by State: Fiscal Year 2011Total expenditures by public elementary and secondary school systems totaled $595.1 billion in 2011, down 1.1 percent from 2010. This is the second time total expenditures have shown a year-to-year decrease, the first time being 2010.
Today's findings come from Public Education Finances: 2011. These statistics provide figures on revenues, expenditures, debt and assets (cash and security holdings) of the nation's elementary and secondary public school systems for the 2011 fiscal year. The release includes detailed statistics on spending — such as instruction, student transportation, salaries and employee benefits — at the national, state and school district levels.
Of the $595.1 billion in total expenditures for public school systems, $522.1 billion is comprised of current spending (i.e. operational expenditures, not including long-term debt). Expenditure for instruction amounted to $316.3 billion (60.6 percent) of the total current spending, while costs for support services amounted to $178.7 billion (34.2 percent). Instructional salaries were the largest expenditure category for public elementary and secondary education, accounting for $208.8 billion in 2011.
On the revenue side, public schools received $599.1 billion in total revenue for 2011, an increase of 1.1 percent from 2010. The largest source of revenue is from state governments at $265.9 billion (44.4 percent of total revenue), followed by local governments at $259.5 billion (43.3 percent) and the federal government providing $73.7 billion (12.3 percent).
States that had the highest percentage of their total public school revenue coming from federal funding included Mississippi (22.3 percent of the statewide education revenue), South Dakota (20.3 percent), Louisiana (18.7 percent), Alaska (17.8 percent), Florida (17.8 percent) and New Mexico (17.7 percent).
Conversely, states that had the lowest percentage of their total school revenue coming from federal funding were New Jersey (5.1 percent), New Hampshire (6.5 percent), Vermont (7.1 percent), Massachusetts (7.8 percent), Minnesota (7.8 percent) and Connecticut (8.3 percent).
Other highlights:
  • Property taxes accounted for 65.6 percent of revenue from local sources for public school systems.
  • Of the 100 largest school systems by enrollment in the U.S., New York City School District in New York ($19,770) had the highest current spending per student in 2011, followed by Boston Public Schools in Massachusetts ($19,181), Baltimore City Public Schools in Maryland ($15,483), Montgomery County Public Schools in Maryland ($15,421), and Howard County Schools in Maryland ($15,139).
  • States spending the least per student were Mississippi ($7,928), Arizona ($7,666), Oklahoma ($7,587), Idaho ($6,824) and Utah ($6,212).
  • Eight out of nine states in the Northeast region of the U.S. were ranked among the top 15 in current spending per student in 2011. The remaining state in the northeast, Maine, was ranked 17th. Out of the 16 states with the lowest per student spending, 15 were in the South and West regions. The remaining state, South Dakota, was in the Midwest.
-X-
The data used in the tabulations came from a census of all 15,191 public school systems. As such, they are not subject to sampling error. Although quality assurance methods were applied to all phases of data collection and processing, the data are subject to nonsampling error, including errors of response and miscoding. For more information, visit the Census Bureau's website at <http://www.census.gov/govs/school/>.



PER-PUPIL EDUCATIONAL EXPENDITURES ADJUSTED FOR REGIONAL COST DIFFERENCES


New York19,07618,618457.792.5
District of Columbia18,47518,667-191.77-1.0
Alaska16,67415,783891.465.6
New Jersey15,96816,841-872.73-5.2
Vermont15,92515,274651.724.3
Wyoming15,84915,169679.974.5
Connecticut15,60014,906693.794.7
Massachusetts13,94113,590350.972.6
Maryland13,87113,738133.091.0
Rhode Island13,81513,699116.790.9
Pennsylvania13,46712,995471.733.6
New Hampshire13,22412,383840.256.8
Delaware12,68512,383302.282.4
Hawaii12,00411,754250.452.1
West Virginia11,84611,527319.202.8
Wisconsin11,77411,364409.413.6
Maine11,43812,259-820.45-6.7
North Dakota11,42010,991429.073.9
Ohio11,22311,030192.491.7
Nebraska10,82510,73491.210.8
Michigan10,82310,644179.901.7
Illinois10,77411,634-860.33-7.4
Louisiana10,72310,63884.750.8
Minnesota10,71210,68527.040.3
Montana10,63910,497141.741.4
Virginia10,36410,597-232.40-2.2
Iowa9,8079,76343.680.4
Oregon9,6829,62458.380.6
Kansas9,4989,715-217.09-2.2
Washington9,4839,45230.870.3
Missouri9,4109,634-224.14-2.3
Indiana9,3709,611-241.61-2.5
Arkansas9,3539,143210.172.3
Kentucky9,3098,948360.964.0
Georgia9,2539,394-141.10-1.5
California9,1399,375-235.93-2.5
New Mexico9,0709,384-313.41-3.3
South Carolina8,9869,143-156.95-1.7
Florida8,8878,741145.211.7
Alabama8,8138,881-68.04-0.8
South Dakota8,8058,858-53.70-0.6
Colorado8,7248,853-129.03-1.5
Texas8,6718,746-74.51-0.9
Nevada8,5278,48343.790.5
North Carolina8,3128,409-96.36-1.1
Tennessee8,2428,065177.472.2
Mississippi7,9288,119-191.15-2.4
Arizona7,6667,848-182.24-2.3
Oklahoma7,5877,896-308.84-3.9
Idaho6,8247,106-281.98-4.0
Utah6,2126,064148.562.4
http://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/5199-per-pupil-educational-expenditures-adjusted-for-regional-cost-differences?loc=1&loct=2#ranking/2/any/true/133/any/11678

List of U.S. states by poverty rate

RankStatePoverty Rate
(by Household Income)
People in Poverty
by Household Income
(in thousands)
2009 Poverty Rates
(includes unrelated children)
Supplemental Poverty Measure
(Geographically Adjusted)
-United States12.6%45,950
01New Hampshire5.6%737.9%10.4%
02New Jersey6.8%5929.5%12.2%
03Vermont7.6%479.6%8.3%
04Minnesota8.1%41211.1%10.7%
05Hawaii8.6%11012.6%18.0%
06Delaware9.2%7812.4%13.9%
07Utah9.2%2319.8%9.5%
08Virginia9.2%68410.8%11.7%
09Connecticut9.7%3268.6%11.1%
10Nebraska9.5%16710.0%9.1%
11Maryland9.7%5429.7%14.0%
12Idaho9.9%14313.9%11.6%
13Alaska10.0%6612.1%11.0%
14Massachusetts10.1%64110.9%13.6%
15Washington10.2%63611.9%11.2%
16Wisconsin10.2%55311.1%10.7%
17Nevada10.6%26013.1%17.2%
18Wyoming10.6%549.3%9.0%
19Florida11.1%2,25014.6%19.5%
20North Dakota11.2%7011.0%8.4%
21Pennsylvania11.2%1,37211.2%10.5%
22Iowa11.3%32710.9%7.9%
23Colorado11.4%53012.4%14.8%
24Illinois11.5%1,44113.3%13.8%
25Missouri11.6%65915.6%12.8%
26South Dakota11.8%9014.3%11.6%
27Michigan12.0%1,19614.2%12.4%
28Oregon12.0%43613.7%13.3%
29Rhode Island12.1%12713.2%12.2%
30Ohio12.3%1,39213.5%11.5%
31Kansas12.5%33713.9%11.1%
32Indiana12.6%77416.4%14.8%
33Maine12.6%16611.6%9.6%
34North Carolina13.1%1,11517.0%14.3%
35California13.2%4,71615.5%22.4%
36Montana13.8%12813.5%10.5%
37Georgia14.4%1,29818.5%18.8%
38New York14.5%2,76015.9%17.6%
39Kentucky14.8%59917.1%13.2%
40Tennessee15.0%87216.7%14.3%
41South Carolina15.0%62613.8%13.8%
42Arizona15.2%91721.3%21.6%
43West Virginia15.4%27616.0%11.3%
44Oklahoma15.6%54313.0%10.8%
45Arkansas15.9%50919.1%15.9%
46Texas16.2%3,68117.4%16.5%
47Alabama16.7%75016.8%15.9%
48New Mexico17.9%34719.6%15.8%
49Louisiana18.3%74814.3%12.8%
50Mississippi20.1%57123.2%17%
51District of Columbia20.7%1518.0%23.1%
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_poverty_rate

Fallacies, realities about teachers and education schools | Other Views | NewsObserver.com

Fallacies, realities about teachers and education schools | Other Views | NewsObserver.com:

Fallacies, realities about teachers and education schools

Every day when we come to work, we have the privilege of interacting with amazing young people. Many of them were among the top students in their high schools with average SAT scores above 1100 and an average weighted GPA of 4.4.
Further, they have college GPAs above 3.0, and many graduate magna cum laude. These young individuals perform a large amount of service work in the community and engage in international activities to learn more about the world around them. Most North Carolinians would like to work with such outstanding people and learn about the amazing things they are doing.
If we say we work at N.C. State, many people would wonder in what technical field we teach. But, actually, we work in the College of Education. And the wonderful people we are talking about all intend to be teachers. In fact, they are all future teachers, and the vast majority will serve schools in North Carolina.
Let us say this again: These amazing, smart and hard-working students all want to be teachers. N.C. State is a selective university, and these high-achieving students, who could choose from a variety of majors, choose to become teachers.
The current public discourse often paints teachers as ineffective, sub-professionals who likely had no other choice than to teach. These substandard professionals, the current discourse goes, need more and more accountability through testing, performance regulations and report cards to make sure they are performing their craft in an “effective” manner. After all, those who can, do; and those who can’t, teach – or so the current discourse is trying to prove. This image of a less-than-qualified student who goes on to become a low-performing professional does not match the reality we experience every day.

The current attack on public school teachers has expanded to attacking Colleges of Education. Or, as a Bill Keller recently put it in an op-ed in the New York Times: “Those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach. And those who can’t teach, teach teaching.”
Keller called Colleges of Education “an industry of mediocrity” and specified a laundry list of what

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/11/06/3346796/fallacies-realities-about-teachers.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/11/06/3346796/fallacies-realities-about-teachers.html#storylink=cpy