Tuesday, July 6, 2010
8 Theories on Why College Kids Are Studying Less | The Atlantic Wire
8 Theories on Why College Kids Are Studying Less
- Study Leaders Cite Professor Apathy The Boston Globe's Keith O'Brien writes, "when it comes to 'why,' the answers are less clear. ... What might be causing it, they suggest, is the growing power of students and professors’ unwillingness to challenge them."
- Modern Technology Not to Blame The Boston Globe's Keith O'Brien says the study leaders don't think so. "The easy culprits — the allure of the Internet (Facebook!), the advent of new technologies (dude, what’s a card catalog?), and the changing demographics of college campuses — don’t appear to be driving the change, Babcock and Marks found." Why so sure? "According to their research, the greatest decline in student studying took place before computers swept through colleges: Between 1961 and 1981, study times fell from 24.4 to 16.8 hours per week (and then, ultimately, to 14)."
- Grades Becoming Less Important Than Activities An anonymous Mother Jonescommenter writes, "I graduated recently, and Prospective employers and graduate school admission committees are very interested in your extracurricular and leadership positions, or your research work. Grades matter, but they are not the only thing. Perhaps in the seventies, grades were the main signal of success, so students studied more?"
- Increase in 'Temporary, Adjunct' Faculty Mother Jones commenter Lisa argues, "Rise in numbers of temporary, adjunct faculty, who teach many, many courses, and are terribly vulnerable to course evaluations (that's me, by the way). One can only assign so much work
The Stimulus Wars Get Friendly | The Atlantic Wire
The Stimulus Wars Get Friendly
It seems unlikely that Krugman and Ferguson loyalists will ever concede to one other. But is there a middle way? The following pundits spent some time this week trying to find consensus between the two extremes.
- Let's Be Pragmatic, writes David Brooks at The New York Times: "So you have your doubts, but you are practical. You want to do something. Too much debt could lead to national catastrophe. Too much austerity could lead to stagnation. Well, there's a few short-term things you can do. First, extend unemployment insurance; that's a foolish place to begin budget-balancing. Second, you need to mitigate the pain caused by the state governments that are slashing spending. You need a program modeled on Race to the Top. You will provide federal money now to states that pass responsible long-term budget plans that will reduce spending and pension commitments."
- Both Sides Have Something to Offer, writes Henry Blodget at Business Insider: "Where are we on this fight between Krugman (Keynesians) and Niall Ferguson, et al (who argue that our ballooning debts and deficits will kill us in the end)? In the middle. We think Krugman is right about the short-term impact 'austerity' will have on the global economy, and we never hear the Tea Party and other austerity pundits acknowledge that. At the same time, we don't think
Sacramento Digital Media Economy — The Rancho Cordova Post
Is Sacramento a Digital Media Hot Spot or Dead Zone
NorthJersey.com: N.J. Assembly leader says she won't block property tax deal
LAST UPDATED: TUESDAY JULY 6, 2010, 2:23 PM
“I think that the political reality in New Jersey is that taxpayers want to see some effort made by the Legislature to control property taxes,” Oliver said. “So I don’t think that the General Assembly would stand in the way of that.”
Still, Oliver said Assembly Democrats have concerns they want to address with Christie before he takes any further action, and she is hoping to speak with him today.
“He had his schedule already established for today as did I, but we’re seeking to maybe get together as the day closes out,” she said.
Under Christie’s compromise with Sweeney, the governor plans to conditionally veto a bill the Legislature passed last week that would have lowered the property tax cap but include a number of exceptions.
The conditional veto would lower the cap further and only allow municipalities to exceed it for costs from health insurance, pensions, debt service payments and
Hechinger Report | Results are mixed on small schools in Philly
Results are mixed on small schools in Philly
New York City went for small high schools in a big way, and the country’s largest school system is still high on that education reform strategy.
Small schools in Philadelphia
Read the first part of the series that explores how the small schools movement has worked out of Philly high school students.And in Philadelphia, the superintendent’s message is clear – small schools are fine, but don’t expect any new ones until inequities at big neighborhood high schools are fixed.
For a time in the mid-2000s, small schools were booming. They were supposed to transform the large, failing American high school, to engage students and boost their achievement to ready them for college.
But the results have been mixed, national and local research shows. Students at small high schools were more
Teachers' jobs vs. Race to the Top? | Philadelphia Public School Notebook
Teachers' jobs vs. Race to the Top?
by Rajiv Venkataramanan on Jul 06 2010
- $500 million from RttT,
- $100 million from charter school expansions, and
- $200 million from the teacher incentive fund.
On Teacher Buy-In and IMPACT � The Quick and the Ed
On Teacher Buy-In and IMPACT
The following blog post has been re-posted from ABCDE, written by DCPS high school English teacher Wookie Kim.
As a teacher, I see Post-It notes as my personal guardians. Filled with reminders, notes, slogans, messages, and posted—literally—all around me, they guide me and protect my life from the uncertainties of not knowing. They are beautiful (and, if you go to Costco, not too expensive in bulk!). One Post-It note that has been up on my bedroom wall—placed conspicuously by the door above the lightswitch to serve as a constant reminder—contains a quote that I firmly believe in:
Texas Education Agency Firing Over Creationism E-Mail Upheld - The School Law Blog - Education Week
Texas Education Agency Firing Over Creationism E-Mail Upheld
This Week In Education: Media: Sentimental Treatment For A Chicago Violence Prevention Program
Media: Sentimental Treatment For A Chicago Violence Prevention Program
Democurmudgeon: Wealth Care Sycophants: Sean Duffy, Scott Walker, Ron Johnson, Paul Ryan, Tea Party Movement...
Wealth Care Sycophants: Sean Duffy, Scott Walker, Ron Johnson, Paul Ryan, Tea Party Movement...

Congressional candidate Sean Duffy cares more about the increased taxes on large companies and wealthy people than he does about the average Wisconsin taxpayer. The same goes for Republicans Scott Walker and Ron Johnson. And who's about to back these Wealth Care candidates; the GOP and tea party "constitutionalists." The founding fathers aren't just rolling over in their graves, their sailing back to England on the first ghost ship out.
Remember when corporate tax cuts and lower taxes on wealth were supposed to spur economic growth, trickle down "voodoo economics" they called it, after the mild 2001 recession. Now after the Great Bush Recession, how'd that work out for you? It didn't, in spades.
So why is congressional candidate, Democratic State Sen. Julie Lassa, "defending" herself against a conservative candidate fighting for "Wealth Care" in the name of "freedom and liberty?" Like the Wisconsin State Journal pointed out:
Free Technology for Teachers: Seven Videos All Educators Should Watch
Seven Videos All Teachers & Principals Should Watch
The "classic" of course is the various incarnations of Karl Fisch's and Scott McLeod's Did You Know? Version 4.0 is embedded below, but I still prefer this version.
For Georgian Choice, Slips Twixt the Cup and Lip :: Frederick M. Hess
For Georgian Choice, Slips Twixt the Cup and Lip
by Frederick M. Hess • Jun 30, 2010 at 9:10 am
Cross-posted from Education Week
| ShareThis |
The Republic of Georgia's attempt to embrace expansive school choice has encountered some substantial roadblocks, all of which are more than a little familiar and may provide some useful guidance and cautions for those promoting choice-based reform in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Georgia offers a terrific illustration of the difference between choice in theory and in practice. The theory of choice requires that schools compete for students, with rewards flowing to schools that attract students (and therefore revenues) and adverse consequences to those that do not. However, in Georgia, there is no shame in being director (e.g. principal) of a school whose revenues do not cover its outlays. Indeed, half or more of the nation's 2,300 schools are now "deficit" schools. The rationales and excuses are many. "High mountain" schools cannot attract new students (though, of course, they also don't lose students, and they receive a voucher weighted at 1.7 times the basic voucher), utility bills are unexpectedly high, especially in areas affected by the 2008 Russian invasion, and so on.
As the reform-friendly Transparency International Georgia concluded in a 2010 analysis, the reforms have "not been as successful in achieving many of [their] objectives as had been hoped. A lack of funding for the voucher system has meant that schools have not been able to assert their financial autonomy. School boards of









