State Standards, Mapping the NAEP, & Student Performance: Who's the "Liar"? Part I
Education Secretary Arne Duncan is sick and tired of all those states that "lie" to their students:
Angry Arne's construction here is something I've heard echoed over and over again throughout Reformyland: we must set higher standards for our children if they are ever going to succeed in the real world of 21st century global competition knowledge-based competitive blah blah blah...“The idea that the Common Core standards are nationally-imposed is a conspiracy theory in search of a conspiracy. The Common Core academic standards were both developed and adopted by the states, and they have widespread bipartisan support. GOP leaders like Jeb Bush and governors Mitch Daniels, Chris Christie, and Bill Haslam have supported the Common Core standards because they realize states must stop dummying down academic standards and lying about the performance of children and schools. In fact, South Carolina lowered the bar for proficiency in English and mathematics faster than any state in the country from 2005 to 2009, according to research by the National Center for Education Statistics.“That’s not good for children, parents, or teachers. I hope South Carolina lawmakers will heed the voices of teachers who supported South Carolina’s decision to stop lowering academic standards and set a higher bar for success. And I hope lawmakers will continue to support the state’s decision to raise standards, with the goal of making every child college- and career-ready in today’s knowledge economy.” [emphasis mine]
But is it true? Does setting higher standards lead to better performance?
Let's find out.
Every few years, the good folks at the National Center for Education Statistics put out a cool piece of research that attempts to shed light on how states judge their student to be - See more at: http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2015/07/state-standards-mapping-naep-student.html#sthash.90fF4CTi.dpuf
