Why is Obama calling for a ‘rigorous curriculum’ for 3-year-olds?
Given that research clearly shows big benefits of quality early childhood education, President Obama’s new proposal to greatly expand these programs seems like a no-brainer. In fact, the first question to ask might be this: Why didn’t he do this sooner?
As it turns out, his administration did promote an early education initiative in his first term, and that is what raises a big concern about the ultimate fate of the new proposal.
Back in 2011, the administration’s Race to the Top sweepstakes — in which states and even districts can compete for federal funds based on promises to implement specific school reforms — had a round that focused on early childhood education. The first priority states were asked to consider as they wrote their proposals was this:
“Priority 1: Absolutely Priority — Using Early Learning and Development Standards and
How many ineffective teachers are actually out there?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7584/a7584a086499ae1b312ba0b36feb34dd1e6d02fc" alt="question mark"
By Aaron Pallas
How many New York City public schoolteachers are so incompetent that they should be fired? That’s the 250-million-dollar question that must be addressed by both sides wrangling over what kind of teacher-evaluation system the city is going to build.
How many New York City public schoolteachers are so incompetent that they should be fired? That’s the 250-million-dollar question that must be addressed by both sides wrangling over what kind of teacher-evaluation system the city is going to build.
For months now, despite a state mandate to build such a system, Mayor Michael