Latest News and Comment from Education

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

TODAY'S TOP NEWS - YESTERDAY'S BEST BLOG POST JANUARY 7, 2026

 

TODAY'S TOP NEWS STORIES 

JANUARY 7, 2026 

U.S. News
  1. Fifth Anniversary of January 6 Capitol Riot: President Trump marked the anniversary by rewriting history, pardoning rioters, and launching a webpage blaming opponents and media; Democrats held hearings warning of a "whitewash."
  2. U.S. Military Operation in Venezuela: Nicolás Maduro captured in a raid, pleaded not guilty in U.S. court; Trump claims Venezuela will hand over oil, sparking partisan divide and international concerns.
  3. Trump Revives Greenland Ambition: White House confirms discussions to acquire Greenland, including military options as a possibility.
  4. Wildfires and Health Impacts: Eaton fire devastates California areas; ACA subsidy expiration leads to higher health insurance costs for millions starting 2026.
  5. Vance Home Vandalism: Arrest made for property damage at Vice President JD Vance's Ohio residence.
Politics
  1. Trump Warns of Impeachment: Told House Republicans a third impeachment likely if Democrats retake House in 2026 midterms.
  2. Venezuela Fallout: Lawmakers demand details on Maduro capture; public split on approval (33% support per poll).
  3. Jan. 6 Commemorations: Trump recasts riot narrative; pardoned participants march while opponents protest.
  4. Federal Health Changes: CDC scales back childhood vaccine recommendations; potential overhaul looms.
  5. Midterm Focus: Early jockeying for 2026 elections, with House control key to Trump's agenda.
World Affairs
  1. Venezuela Crisis Escalates: U.S. strike captures Maduro; Trump eyes oil control and potential blockade; international criticism mounts.
  2. Greenland Tensions: European leaders push back on U.S. acquisition threats, calling it challenge to NATO principles.
  3. Ukraine Peace Talks: France and UK commit to military hubs if ceasefire agreed; Paris meetings ongoing.
  4. Middle East and Asia Developments: Iran executes alleged spy; protests grow; Japan earthquake strikes.
  5. Global Reactions: Europe rejects U.S. Venezuela actions; Trump comments on Modi tariffs strain India-U.S. ties.
Education
  1. New State Laws in Effect: California rolls out cellphone limits, gender-neutral bathrooms, and healthier school meals in 2026.
  2. AI and Tech Integration: Rising adoption of AI tools in classrooms; predictions for personalized learning and STEM focus.
  3. Policy Debates: Indiana eyes stricter cellphone bans and school efficiency measures.
  4. International Partnerships: Microsoft and others expand AI training in schools globally.
  5. Trends for 2026: Hyper-personalized education via wearables; concerns over AI equity.
Economy
  1. Wall Street Optimism: Forecasts for S&P 500 to reach 7,500–8,000 by end-2026; mediocre but resilient growth expected.
  2. Fed and Policy Risks: Trump pressures for rate cuts; potential new chair nomination raises independence concerns.
  3. Venezuela Oil Impact: Potential influx of Venezuelan oil to U.S. amid geopolitical shifts.
  4. AI and Tech Boom: Continued capital expenditure on AI; bubble fears among top risks.
  5. Global Outlook: Tariffs, deficits, and inflation pose challenges; U.S. projected to outperform.
Technology
  1. CES 2026 Highlights: Lenovo rollable laptops, Nvidia Vera Rubin AI platform, Intel Core Ultra Series 3 chips debut.
  2. Robotics Surge: Humanoid robots and AI integrations dominate; Google partners with Boston Dynamics.
  3. AI Advancements: New chips from Nvidia/AMD/Qualcomm; DLSS updates and autonomous driving tech.
  4. Laptop Wars: Snapdragon X2 Elite, Ryzen AI, Panther Lake compete for performance crowns.
  5. Displays and Concepts: Expandable screens, Wi-Fi 8 routers, and immersive lighting systems unveiled.
Health
  1. ACA Subsidies Expire: Millions face steep premium hikes in 2026; coverage losses projected.
  2. Flu Surge: Record-high doctor visits; 5,000+ deaths this season amid vaccine schedule changes.
  3. Measles Threat: U.S. risks losing elimination status by January 2026 due to outbreaks.
  4. Policy Overhauls: CDC cuts childhood vaccines; potential FDA warnings on COVID shots.
  5. Trends for 2026: Rise in GLP-1 drugs, AI wearables, and personalized wellness.
Sports
  1. NFL Season Wrap-Up: Playoff races heat up; coaching changes and injuries dominate headlines.
  2. NBA Action: Key matchups like Lakers vs. Pelicans; nightly recaps highlight stars.
  3. 2026 Preview: Busy calendar with Winter Olympics, World Cup buildup, and midterms impact.
  4. Transfer Window: Premier League January moves underway.
  5. College and Pro Predictions: Bold forecasts for championships and player movements.




Wyoming Supreme Court Overturns Abortion Bans https://dianeravitch.net/2026/01/06/wyoming-supreme-court-overturns-abortion-bans/ via @dianeravitch 

The Wyoming Supreme Court has overturned two laws that sought to ban abortion and abortion pills, ruling that they violated the state constitution's guarantee of a woman's right to make her own healthcare decisions. The laws were initially passed in 2023 following the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade. The Governor of Wyoming expressed outrage and plans to push for a constitutional amendment to prohibit abortion entirely, which would require voter approval in a future referendum. The case was brought forward by Wyoming’s only abortion clinic, a nonprofit organization, and a group of women.

### Key Points
- The Wyoming Supreme Court overturned two abortion-related laws, citing a violation of the state constitution's guarantee of a woman's right to make her own healthcare decisions. 
- The overturned laws included a near-total abortion ban and a prohibition on abortion pills, both passed in 2023 following the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade. 
- Wyoming's Governor plans to propose a constitutional amendment to ban abortion, which would require a public referendum in 2026. 
- The legal challenge was brought by Wyoming’s sole abortion clinic, a nonprofit organization, and a group of women. 

January 6: The Worst Day in U.S. History https://dianeravitch.net/2026/01/06/january-6-the-worst-day-in-u-s-history/ via @dianeravitch 

January 6: The Worst Day in U.S. History

### Key Points
- On January 6, 2021, a mob of Trump supporters violently stormed the U.S. Capitol, aiming to overturn the 2020 election results
- Despite losing over 60 court cases and being told by advisors he lost the election, Trump continued to spread false claims of election fraud. 
- Trump incited the mob with a speech urging them to march on the Capitol, but he did not join them as promised. Instead, he watched the events unfold on television. 
- The rioters caused significant damage, assaulted law enforcement officers, and disrupted the certification of electoral votes. 
- Trump delayed calling for the rioters to leave the Capitol, and his tweets during the attack were seen as inflammatory by his staff and even his own children. 
- The House select committee's report highlighted Trump's role in inciting the violence and his reluctance to de-escalate the situation. 
- Trump has since tried to rewrite the narrative of January 6, referring to it as a "hoax" and a "beautiful day," while many of his supporters continue to believe his false claims. 
- The attack is considered one of the darkest days in U.S. history because it was an assault on democracy by Americans themselves. 

Harvard President Blames Faculty Activism for Repression of Free Speech https://dianeravitch.net/2026/01/06/harvard-president-blanes-facukty-activism-for-repression-of-free-speech/ via @dianeravitch 

Harvard University President Alan Garber has expressed concerns about faculty activism in classrooms, stating that it has suppressed free speech and open debate among students. He emphasized the need for neutrality in teaching and fostering an environment where students feel comfortable expressing dissenting opinions. Garber highlighted steps being taken to address these issues, such as promoting objectivity in teaching and implementing new university orientation modules to encourage empathetic discussions on controversial topics.

### Key Points

- Harvard President Alan Garber criticized faculty activism for creating a repressive climate on campus and stifling free speech. 

- Garber emphasized the importance of maintaining neutrality in classrooms to encourage open discourse and student participation. 

- The university is introducing measures like orientation modules to teach effective communication on controversial issues and reports addressing bias. 

Parker Molloy Read Jack Smith's Testimony So You Wouldn't Have To https://dianeravitch.net/2026/01/06/parker-molloy-read-jack-smiths-testimony-so-you-dont-have-to/ via @dianeravitch 

This article discusses Special Prosecutor Jack Smith’s testimony, which was released by House Republicans on New Year’s Eve. Smith testified about his investigations into Donald Trump, asserting proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump engaged in criminal activities, including attempting to overturn the 2020 election and retaining classified documents after leaving office. Smith emphasized his impartiality, stating he would prosecute anyone regardless of political affiliation. The article also touches on Trump’s actions in Venezuela and the arrest of a protester in Michigan.

### Key Points

- Special Prosecutor Jack Smith testified before the House Judiciary Committee, claiming evidence of Trump’s criminal actions related to the 2020 election and classified documents. 

- Smith stated he would prosecute anyone based on evidence, irrespective of political affiliation, and reaffirmed his commitment to justice. 

- The testimony was released on New Year’s Eve, a strategic move by House Republicans to minimize public attention. 

- Trump’s actions in Venezuela, including the sale of CITGO Petroleum Corporation to a donor, are criticized as imperialistic and self-serving. 

- A preschool teacher in Michigan was arrested for protesting Trump’s Venezuela invasion, highlighting tensions around his policies. 

Peter Greene: Ohio Slams Schools with an Unfunded Mandate https://dianeravitch.net/2026/01/06/peter-greene-ohio-slams-schools-with-an-unfunded-mandate/ via @dianeravitch 

Ohio's legislature is considering a bill that mandates schools to provide free "high-dosage tutoring" and professional development for math teachers. However, the mandate lacks funding, placing a significant burden on schools. The bill, championed by Andrew Brenner, has been criticized for its impracticality and the absence of resources to implement it effectively. Critics argue that such unfunded mandates are a way to set public schools up for failure, fueling arguments for privatization.

### Key Points

- Ohio's legislature proposes an unfunded mandate requiring free high-dosage tutoring and professional development for math teachers. 

- The bill's sponsor, Andrew Brenner, claims it addresses students' needs but offers no funding for implementation. 

- Critics highlight the impracticality of scaling up high-dosage tutoring without significant resources and funding. 

- The legislation could exacerbate challenges for public schools, potentially undermining their credibility and promoting privatization. 

- Lawmakers often impose mandates without providing the necessary resources, leading to ineffective implementation. 



Big Education Ape: JACK SMITH TESTIMONY: WHEN JUSTICE CAME KNOCKING (BUT NOBODY ANSWERED THE DOOR) https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2026/01/jack-smith-testimony-when-justice-came.html 

Jack Smith Testimony - Jack Smith, former Special Counsel, testified before the U.S. House Judiciary Committee about his investigations into Donald Trump's alleged election interference and handling of classified documents. Despite presenting substantial evidence, including witness testimony, classified documents, and phone records, political dynamics and Trump's re-election resulted in the cases being dismissed. Smith highlighted the challenges of pursuing justice in a politically charged environment and expressed concerns about political retribution against investigators. His testimony serves as a reflection on the intersection of legal evidence and political influence.

### Key Points
- Critical questions should be asked before implementing new educational technologies or policies to ensure their effectiveness. 
- Jack Smith's deposition focused on his investigations into Trump's alleged election interference and mishandling of classified documents. 
- Smith presented evidence, including witness testimonies, phone records, and classified documents, indicating Trump's actions to overturn the 2020 election and obstruct justice. 
- Smith emphasized his nonpartisan approach and adherence to legal protocols but faced political opposition and threats. 
- Despite strong evidence, Trump's re-election led to the dismissal of cases, highlighting the challenges of pursuing justice in a politically charged environment. 
- Smith's testimony reflects the tension between legal evidence and political realities. 

Big Education Ape: TODAY'S TOP NEWS - YESTERDAY'S BEST BLOG POST JANUARY 6, 2026 https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2026/01/todays-top-news-yesterdays-best-blog_0760529618.html 

The article provides a comprehensive overview of global and domestic events as of early January 2026. It highlights significant political, educational, economic, and technological developments, with a focus on the U.S. military intervention in Venezuela, policy changes in healthcare and education, advancements in AI, and societal issues like wealth inequality and public education privatization.

### Key Points  
- The U.S. military captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, sparking international backlash and domestic protests.   
- Trump announced temporary U.S. control over Venezuela to stabilize oil production and manage a government transition, raising concerns about sovereignty and global stability.   
- Critics argue the Venezuela operation is unconstitutional and serves U.S. oil interests rather than humanitarian concerns.   
- The intervention has led to geopolitical tensions, with China, Russia, and Latin American countries condemning U.S. actions.   
- The Trump administration faces criticism for bypassing Congress and ignoring constitutional requirements for military action.   
- Expiration of ACA subsidies caused steep health insurance premium hikes, risking coverage for over 20 million Americans.   
- CDC revised childhood vaccine recommendations, shifting to "shared decision-making" with providers, raising public health concerns.   
- Rising measles outbreaks threaten the U.S. elimination status due to declining immunization rates.   
- Connecticut implemented a play-based learning law for early education, showing improved student outcomes and reduced stress.   
- Florida’s "Schools of Hope" program allows charter schools to occupy public school spaces, causing financial strain and undermining public education.   
- Billionaires are criticized for exploiting tax loopholes, privatizing public services, and undermining democracy and social mobility.   
- Sensational news stories, like the Venezuela crisis, distract from critical domestic issues like healthcare, food prices, and energy costs.   
- AI misuse raises ethical concerns, including the creation of non-consensual sexualized images and its psychological impact on children.   
- The accountability era of education reform, focused on standardized testing, failed to address systemic issues like poverty and inequity.   
- The rise of AI in education sparks debates on equity, traditional teaching, and the psychological impact of AI companions on children.   
- CES 2026 showcases advancements in AI, robotics, and immersive technologies with practical applications, but raises concerns about their societal impacts.   
- The U.S. withdrawal from the World Health Organization is set to take effect on January 22, 2026.   
- Advocates call for democratic reforms, tax reform, and public investment to counteract wealth inequality and protect public welfare. 

Big Education Ape: MORNING NEWS UPDATE: JANUARY 6, 2026 https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2026/01/morning-news-update-january-6-2026.html 

The article covers a range of global, political, technological, and educational updates for early January 2026, including U.S. actions in Venezuela, vaccine policy changes, economic impacts, and CES 2026 highlights.

### Key Points
- Former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro was captured by U.S. forces, pleaded not guilty to narco-terrorism charges, and faced international backlash at the U.N. 
- The fifth anniversary of the January 6 Capitol attack was marked by commemorations, debates on pardons, and the rewriting of historical narratives. 
- The CDC reduced the number of universally recommended childhood vaccines, sparking controversy among experts. 
- The U.S. announced a $10 billion freeze on federal funding for social services in Democratic-led states, citing fraud concerns. 
- Economic updates include concerns over inflation from tariffs, AI-driven inflation risks, and steady GDP growth forecasts despite geopolitical tensions. 
- CES 2026 showcased advancements in AI chips, robotics, and home automation technologies. 
- The U.S. faces its highest flu levels in 25 years due to a new strain, while Novo Nordisk launched an oral version of Wegovy to address supply shortages. 
- Public education updates include extended winter school closures in India, new California education laws, and initiatives to improve teacher education. 
- Sports updates include NFL coaching changes, college basketball rankings, and major upcoming events like the Winter Olympics and World Cup

Big Education Ape: GOD DAMN THE OIL MAN: DONALD TRUMP, THE CRUDE OIL KING https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2026/01/god-damn-oil-man-donald-trump-crude-oil.html 

The U.S.'s oil-driven intervention in Venezuela under Donald Trump. The article critiques America's addiction to oil, its bipartisan complicity, and the environmental, humanitarian, and geopolitical consequences of fossil fuel dependency. It highlights the need for renewable energy as the only sustainable solution.

### Key Points 
- Criticism of Trump's intervention in Venezuela, revealing oil interests behind the "drug war" narrative. 
- America's long-term addiction to oil fuels bipartisan foreign policies and forever wars. 
- Environmental and humanitarian consequences of fossil fuel dependency, with Venezuela as a case study. 
- Call for renewable energy and leadership to break the cycle of fossil fuel addiction. 


The article provides a comprehensive overview of global and domestic events as of January 5, 2026, focusing on U.S. military actions in Venezuela, the impacts of policy changes in education and healthcare, advancements in AI and technology, and societal issues like wealth inequality and privatization of public goods. It highlights the controversial "Donroe Doctrine," critiques on U.S. foreign policy, and the growing influence of billionaires and AI in shaping public education and societal norms.





Big Education Ape MORNING NEWS UPDATE: JANUARY 5, 2026
















Big Education Ape: BILLIONAIRE ETHICS: AN OXYMORON? THE MORAL BANKRUPTCY OF AMERICA'S NEW OLIGARCHY https://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2026/01/billionaire-ethics-oxymoron-moral.html 

The article critiques the ethical and societal implications of the immense concentration of wealth and power among billionaires in the United States. It explores how billionaires exploit tax loopholes, influence political systems, and privatize public goods like education, healthcare, and infrastructure for profit while externalizing societal costs. The article argues that this oligarchic system undermines democracy, social mobility, and public welfare, calling for democratic reforms, stronger regulations, and investments in public services to counteract the growing inequality and protect the public good.


Distractions That Interrupt Classroom Teaching and Learning (Tony Riehl) https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2026/01/06/distractions-that-interrupt-classroom-teaching-and-learning-tony-riehl/ via @CubanLarry 

Larry Cuban’s blog post discusses classroom distractions, particularly the challenge of managing cell phone use, and highlights veteran math teacher Tony Riehl’s approach to handling distractions. Riehl introduced a “distraction box” policy to manage not only cell phones but also other distracting items. His approach fosters a positive classroom atmosphere by promoting mutual respect and teaching students self-regulation and focus. Dan Meyer, an education blogger, praises this policy for addressing various distractions without singling out specific items and for strengthening teacher-student relationships.

### Key Points

- Managing classroom distractions, especially cell phone use, is essential for effective teaching and learning. 

- Tony Riehl’s “distraction box” policy includes various distracting items, not just cell phones, and encourages students to voluntarily place items in the box to maintain focus. 

- The policy promotes a positive classroom atmosphere, avoids confrontations, and builds mutual respect between teachers and students. 

- Dan Meyer supports the policy, emphasizing its focus on teaching self-regulation and its adaptability to different distractions. 



Setting Them Up for Failure Ohio legislature passes education mandate, fails to provide funding ANDY SPEARS https://theeducationreport.substack.com/p/setting-them-up-for-failure 

Ohio lawmakers have passed an education mandate requiring schools to provide "high-dosage tutoring" and professional development for math teachers, but they failed to allocate any funding for its implementation. This highlights a recurring issue where legislators impose mandates on schools without providing necessary resources, making it difficult for schools to comply effectively.

### Key Points

- Ohio legislature mandates "high-dosage tutoring" and professional development for math teachers without funding. 

- Legislators often impose education mandates without considering the resources needed for proper implementation. 

- Concerns were raised about potential ties between such mandates and companies benefiting financially from these laws. 



Selling Unity And putting the "Ew" in Mulgrew ARTHUR GOLDSTEIN https://arthurgoldstein.substack.com/p/selling-unity 

The article discusses the internal conflicts and dissatisfaction within the United Federation of Teachers (UFT), particularly focusing on the leadership of Michael Mulgrew and the Unity caucus. It highlights the discontent among members, especially retirees, regarding the management of healthcare, lack of transparency, and the monopolization of union leadership by Unity. The author advocates for change and emphasizes the need for greater engagement and accountability within the union.

### Key Points

- The Unity caucus, led by Michael Mulgrew, faces increasing criticism for its lack of transparency, monopolization of leadership, and resistance to change. 

- Retired Teacher Chapter (RTC) members feel marginalized, with limited decision-making power and restricted access to resources, despite being expected to support Unity. 

- Many retirees are dissatisfied with the union’s handling of healthcare plans, including the introduction of Medicare Advantage without proper consultation. 

- The article criticizes the culture of loyalty to Unity, which prioritizes control and political power over members' interests, leading to apathy and low voter turnout within the union. 

- The author calls for increased member engagement and promises to provide guidance on how to contribute to change within the union. 



Trump's Education Department Axes Grants for Full-Service Community Schools https://janresseger.wordpress.com/2026/01/06/trumps-education-department-axes-grants-for-full-service-community-schools/ via @janresseger 

The article discusses the Trump administration's decision to cancel federal grants for Full-Service Community Schools, a model proven effective in addressing educational disparities caused by poverty. These schools integrate social, medical, and extracurricular services into public schools to support students and families. Critics argue that the grant cancellations undermine efforts to promote equity and diversity in education. The article highlights the negative impact of poverty on educational outcomes and emphasizes the importance of community schools in bridging opportunity gaps.

### Key Points

- Full-Service Community Schools provide integrated social, medical, and extracurricular services to support students and families. 

- The Trump administration canceled $168 million in grants for community schools, citing concerns over diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. 

- Critics argue the cancellation undermines efforts to address educational disparities and support marginalized communities. 

- Research shows the effectiveness of community schools in improving graduation rates, attendance, and student achievement. 

- The American Federation of Teachers filed a lawsuit to block the grant terminations, emphasizing their importance in addressing poverty-related educational gaps. 



2025: Because We Had To Do Something About It https://thejosevilson.com/2025-because-we-had-to-do-something-about-it/ via @TheJoseVilson 

Join 2025: Because We Had To Do Something About It reflects Jose Vilson's personal experiences and societal observations during a challenging year. The article delves into themes of safety, community, systemic inequities, and the author's efforts to foster positive change despite adversity. Vilson recounts a robbery incident that led to reflections on societal failures, his role in supporting youth, and the necessity of building a compassionate and equitable society. He emphasizes the importance of collective action and faith in shaping a better future.

### Key Points

- The author shares personal experiences from 2025, including a robbery at his apartment, prompting reflections on societal inequities and systemic failures. 

- Vilson discusses the impact of economic hardship, rising grocery prices, and lack of community spaces on young people and their families. 

- He highlights his efforts to foster community, educational equity, and mutual care through initiatives like EduColor and local organizing. 

- The article emphasizes the need for adults to fight for young people and work towards a more inclusive and compassionate society. 

- Vilson underscores the importance of faith guiding actions to build a humanity that doesn't leave people behind. 



glen brown: Remember Jacob Chansley? https://teacherpoetmusicianglenbrown.blogspot.com/2026/01/remember-jacob-chansley.html 

J6ers: Where Are They Now? examines the aftermath of Donald Trump's pardons for January 6 Capitol riot participants. It highlights the criminal activities and public appearances of key figures involved in the insurrection, many of whom have reoffended or engaged in controversial actions since their release. The article also discusses Trump's ongoing political influence and actions during his second term.

### Key Points
- Donald Trump pardoned all January 6 offenders on his first day back in office, leading to public safety concerns. 
- Stewart Rhodes, leader of the Oath Keepers, had his sentence commuted and is rebuilding the militia. 
- Enrique Tarrio, former Proud Boys leader, was pardoned but later arrested for assault. 
- Joe Biggs, another Proud Boy, is suing the federal government for wrongful incarceration. 
- Jacob Chansley, the "QAnon Shaman," filed a $40 trillion lawsuit against Trump. 
- Jared Wise, a former FBI agent, was pardoned and now works in Trump's Justice Department. 
- Robert Keith Packer, infamous for wearing a "Camp Auschwitz" hoodie, was arrested again for a felony. 
- Taylor Taranto, involved in the Capitol riot, was arrested for weapons charges and making a hoax bomb threat. 
- Richard "Bigo" Barnett, who left a note on Nancy Pelosi’s desk, is seeking restitution for fees paid. 
- Christopher Moynahan, convicted for his role in the riot, was later arrested for threatening a Democratic leader. 
- Donald Trump, despite evidence of his involvement in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election, is immune from prosecution as president. 
glen brown: No Wars! No Kings! Congress Must Act! https://teacherpoetmusicianglenbrown.blogspot.com/2026/01/no-wars-no-kings-congress-must-act.html 

The article discusses various political and social issues, with a focus on criticism of Donald Trump's actions, particularly regarding his alleged unconstitutional military assault on Venezuela. It highlights the need for Congress to act against authoritarianism, advocates for grassroots activism, and touches on other global and domestic topics such as healthcare, social justice, and environmental concerns.

### Key Points

- The article criticizes Donald Trump's military actions in Venezuela, describing them as unconstitutional, driven by oil interests, and an attempt to consolidate authoritarian power. 

- The author calls for immediate action by Congress to prevent further military escalation and ensure accountability. 

- Grassroots activism is encouraged, with tools and events provided to mobilize public opposition to war and authoritarianism. 

- Broader themes include the importance of resisting oppression, addressing social justice issues, and fighting against fascism. 

- The blog references other political and social concerns, such as healthcare, pensions, education, and environmental justice. 

glen brown: “Congress must do the right thing by voting to stop this obvious catastrophe" https://teacherpoetmusicianglenbrown.blogspot.com/2026/01/congress-must-do-right-thing-by-voting.html 

Glen Brown's blog post critiques former President Donald Trump's military invasion of Venezuela in January 2026. The article discusses the illegality and immorality of the attack, which involved bombing Caracas, abducting Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, and plans to seize Venezuela's oil resources. Legal experts and political figures, including Yale and Harvard law professors, argue that the invasion violates international law, such as the UN Charter and the Fourth Geneva Convention. Critics also emphasize the moral implications of Trump's actions and call for his impeachment and removal from office. The blog reflects on broader themes of political chaos, the abuse of power, and the need for accountability in governance.

### Key Points

- Former President Donald Trump launched a military invasion of Venezuela, which included bombing Caracas and abducting the Venezuelan president and his wife. 

- Legal experts argue that the invasion violated international law, including the UN Charter and the Fourth Geneva Convention. 

- Critics, including scholars and political figures, describe the invasion as illegal, immoral, and driven by motives of resource exploitation, specifically oil. 

- Calls for Trump’s impeachment and removal intensified following the invasion, with demands for Congress to act against his unauthorized military actions. 

- The blog highlights ongoing political chaos, the erosion of constitutional norms, and the dangers of unchecked presidential power. 



Teacher Tom: No One Escapes Unscarred http://teachertomsblog.blogspot.com/2026/01/no-one-escapes-unscarred.html 

Teacher Tom reflects on the importance of risky play for children, drawing from personal experiences and discussions with educators of different generations. He highlights how modern over-supervision and fear of injuries have led to a decline in risky play, which is essential for emotional resilience, confidence, and self-regulation. The article critiques the societal shift towards constant monitoring and the mental health crisis it contributes to, advocating for creating opportunities for children to engage in risky, unsupervised play.

### Key Points

- Teacher Tom shares personal and generational stories of risky play and its role in childhood development. 

- Younger generations lack experiences of risky play due to over-supervision, leading to disbelief in older generations' stories. 

- The decline in risky play correlates with rising rates of anxiety and depression among children. 

- Risky play is crucial for teaching children emotional resilience, self-regulation, and confidence. 

- Modern culture's fear of physical injury has led to a preference for "safe" indoor activities, contributing to a mental health crisis. 

- Teacher Tom encourages adults to create spaces that allow children to engage in age-appropriate risky play. 

- The author emphasizes the importance of preserving and sharing stories of risky play to inspire future generations. 



Smartphone Use During School Hours by US Youth in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study   Education Research Report https://educationresearchreport.blogspot.com/ 

Education Research Report Tuesday, January 6, 2026 Postsecondary Enrollment, Finance, Employees in Postsecondary Education and Academic Libraries. The article discusses various studies and findings related to education, technology, adolescent behavior, mental health, and sustainability. Highlights include enrollment statistics, smartphone usage among adolescents, the impact of cannabis on teens, the role of video games in reducing burnout, and the potential of sustainable school meals to improve health and environmental outcomes.

### Key Points
- In fall 2024, 16.8 million undergraduate students enrolled at Title IV institutions, with 70% in 4-year institutions, 29% in 2-year institutions, and 2% in less-than-2-year institutions. Females accounted for 57-67% of students across public, private nonprofit, and private for-profit institutions. Distance education varied significantly by institutional type. 
- A study found U.S. adolescents spend over an hour daily on smartphones during school hours, mostly on social media. Disparities in usage were noted among racial groups and income levels, with problematic phone use linked to higher social media time. 
- Increased broadband internet access correlates with higher adolescent suicide ideation, cyberbullying, and body dissatisfaction, especially among girls. 
- Teacher collaboration and collective innovativeness significantly enhance cognitively activating teaching practices, promoting innovative instruction and equity in education. 
- Cannabis use among teens, even infrequent, is associated with emotional distress and poorer academic performance. Frequent use increases the risk of withdrawal symptoms and impacts brain development. 
- Familiar video games like Super Mario Bros. and Yoshi foster childlike wonder, boosting happiness and reducing burnout among young adults. 
- Sustainable school meal programs could reduce undernourishment, diet-related deaths, and environmental impact while promoting agrobiodiversity and food system transformation. 



Carrying Fire: Why My Daughter’s Michigan Acceptance Broke Me Open – Cloaking Inequity https://cloakinginequity.com/2026/01/06/carrying-fire-why-my-daughters-michigan-acceptance-broke-me-open/ 

CARRYING FIRE: WHY MY DAUGHTER’S MICHIGAN ACCEPTANCE BROKE ME OPEN

### Key Points

- The author reflects on the emotional experience of his daughter Lucia being accepted into the University of Michigan, making her a third-generation Wolverine. 

- Lucia's acceptance into the Learning, Equity, and Problem Solving for the Public Good (LEAPS) program highlights her commitment to community-centered leadership and responsibility. 

- The author draws parallels between his daughter’s journey and the story of Prometheus, emphasizing the importance of sharing knowledge and responsibility despite the challenges. 

- Martin Luther King Jr.'s legacy of moral clarity and courage, even in the face of rejection, serves as a lesson on the cost of leadership and the importance of standing for justice. 

- Institutions play a critical role in shaping history by choosing whether to welcome challenging ideas, as illustrated by Sacramento State's decision to host King during a controversial period. 

- A quote from King included in Lucia’s application – "Every person is heir to a legacy of dignity and worthiness" – resonates deeply with the author, connecting the past to the future. 

- LEAPS emphasizes education as a tool for serving the public good, focusing on equity, accountability, and community-centered learning rather than individual success alone. 

- Lucia’s decision to embrace the challenge of carrying "fire" symbolizes her commitment to responsibility, courage, and serving others with integrity. 

- The author expresses hope for Lucia’s future, recognizing the challenges ahead but also the potential for her to lead with purpose and humility. 

- The article concludes with reflections on the broader implications of carrying fire, emphasizing progress, moral responsibility, and the transformative power of education. 



When Implementing New Tech, Always Ask This Question PETER GREENE https://curmudgucation.substack.com/p/when-implementing-new-tech-always 

When implementing new technology or policies in education, it is crucial to consider who truly benefits from these changes. Often, decisions made by administrations prioritize their convenience over the needs of teachers, leading to an increased workload for educators. Many tech solutions, such as digital lesson plans or AI-powered tools, are designed to ease administrative tasks but can inadvertently create more work for teachers. Administrators should evaluate whether new technologies or policies genuinely support teaching and improve the classroom experience. If the primary beneficiaries are not the teachers or students, the adoption of such tools or policies should be reconsidered.

### Key Points

- Administrators often implement policies or technologies that prioritize their own convenience over teachers' needs. 

- Many "labor-saving" systems merely shift the workload to teachers, creating numerous minor inconveniences. 

- Administrative decisions should focus on enabling teachers to perform their jobs effectively and enhance classroom teaching. 

- Some ed tech tools, such as digital lesson plans or AI-powered systems, may not benefit teachers and instead add unnecessary burdens. 

- New technologies should be evaluated based on their actual usefulness to teachers and students, avoiding adoption for the sake of trendiness. 

CURMUDGUCATION: AI Student Spectators https://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2026/01/ai-student-spectators.html 

States are struggling to effectively integrate AI into schools, with some approaches raising concerns about the pedagogical impact. Connecticut's pilot programs and AI tools aim to assist students, but critics argue these methods risk reducing active student participation and learning. Instead of relying on AI for tasks like feedback or role-playing, educators should focus on fostering student creativity and engagement through traditional, hands-on assignments.

### Key Points

- States are facing challenges in implementing AI in schools, often with discouraging results. 

- AI tools in Connecticut schools are praised for privacy protections and education-specific functions but criticized for limiting meaningful student learning. 

- Critics argue AI feedback lacks understanding of student intent, making it less effective for learning. 

- An example of AI-driven assignments shows students becoming passive spectators rather than active participants, which undermines engagement and creativity. 

- Traditional assignments, such as role-playing or creating characters, are emphasized as more effective for student learning and participation. 



Cloaking Inequity: What Would James Baldwin Do? | National Education Policy Center https://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/james-baldwin 


The article reflects on the enduring relevance of James Baldwin's work and philosophy, emphasizing his commitment to truth, justice, and moral responsibility. It explores how Baldwin's ideas on education, art, and social justice remain vital in addressing contemporary issues like systemic inequality, political polarization, and societal denial. The author highlights Baldwin's belief in the transformative power of truth, love, and hope to drive personal and societal change.

### Key Points

- The article reflects on James Baldwin's influence on the author's thinking about leadership, identity, and moral responsibility. 

- Baldwin's works, especially his essays, continue to resonate in times of moral and societal confusion. 

- Baldwin believed in truth-telling as a form of love and an essential tool for confronting systemic inequality and racism. 

- He emphasized the role of educators and artists in fostering awareness, challenging societal norms, and exposing truths. 

- Baldwin advocated for a critical and honest love for America, emphasizing the need to confront its flaws to strengthen its moral foundation. 

- He warned against societal resignation, stressing the importance of participation and accountability in democracy. 

- Baldwin viewed personal introspection as essential to achieving societal transformation and believed that love required vulnerability and truth. 

- Baldwin's hope for change was resilient and rooted in the belief that justice and democracy require continuous effort across generations. 



Choosing Democracy: Where Are America's Leaders? https://choosingdemocracy.blogspot.com/2026/01/where-are-americas-leaders.html 

America's leadership class, including corporate CEOs, political leaders, and heads of institutions, is criticized for their silence or complicity in supporting Donald Trump's authoritarian actions, prioritizing profits and power over principles. The article calls for ordinary citizens to take on leadership roles and resist this trend.

Where the hell are America's leaders? Too many people with formal authority are intimidated by Trump or sucking up to him. That leaves you and me and everyone else without official power to resist his tyranny ROBERT REICH https://robertreich.substack.com/p/where-the-hell-are-americas-leaders 

### Key Points

- America's leadership class, including university presidents, law firm managers, nonprofit directors, and corporate CEOs, is either silent or complicit in supporting Trump's authoritarian agenda. 

- CEOs like Marc Benioff, Tim Cook, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jamie Dimon are accused of enabling Trump’s actions in exchange for tax cuts, federal contracts, and deregulation. 

- The article criticizes the transactional relationship between corporate leaders and political power, which undermines democracy and integrity. 

- The author calls for ordinary citizens to step up as leaders, emphasizing moral authority and grassroots organization to resist authoritarianism. 

- Historical figures like Fannie Lou Hamer and Martin Luther King Jr. are cited as examples of individuals who made significant impacts without holding formal power. 














Tuesday, January 6, 2026

JACK SMITH TESTIMONY: WHEN JUSTICE CAME KNOCKING (BUT NOBODY ANSWERED THE DOOR)


JACK SMITH TESTIMONY: WHEN JUSTICE CAME KNOCKING

(BUT NOBODY ANSWERED THE DOOR)


In what may go down as one of history's most elaborate exercises in "I told you so," former Special Counsel Jack Smith spent eight hours explaining to Congress why Donald Trump should have faced justice—complete with evidence, witnesses, and everything except the one thing that actually matters: a trial.

Released on New Year's Eve (because nothing says "Happy New Year" like 300 pages of legal testimony), Smith's deposition before the House Judiciary Committee reads like a prosecutor's fever dream: airtight evidence, cooperative witnesses, damning phone records, and absolutely zero chance of ever seeing the inside of a courtroom.

The Case That Had Everything (Except a Verdict)

Smith came armed with what prosecutors dream about: testimony from Trump's own allies, documented phone records from January 6, classified documents allegedly stashed at Mar-a-Lago like forgotten pool toys, and a conspiracy theory so thoroughly debunked that even some Republicans were willing to say, "Yeah, that didn't happen."

"The evidence was sufficient for conviction," Smith stated with the confidence of a man holding four aces in a game that got called on account of rain.

The special counsel methodically laid out his case: Trump allegedly orchestrated a scheme to overturn the 2020 election despite being told repeatedly by his own advisors that his fraud claims were, to use the legal term, "complete nonsense." When that didn't work, there was the small matter of classified documents that apparently took an unauthorized vacation to Florida.

The Republican Witness Protection Program

In perhaps the most delicious irony, Smith revealed his strategy relied heavily on Republicans who chose country over party—a demographic roughly as common as unicorns riding Segways. These Trump allies turned witnesses provided the backbone of the case, presumably after realizing that "I was just following orders" hasn't been a winning legal strategy since 1946.

Smith emphasized that January 6 "would not have happened but for Donald Trump," describing the former president as "the most culpable individual" in the conspiracy. It's the prosecutorial equivalent of saying, "Look, if you're going to throw a party that ends with people in the Capitol wearing Viking horns, you can't claim you just sent out innocent invitations."

The Evidence Room of Broken Dreams

The investigation uncovered:

  • Phone records showing White House communications with lawmakers on January 6 (though Smith clarified they only had timestamps, not contents—the legal equivalent of knowing someone called but not what they ordered for dinner)
  • Obstruction evidence including the alleged moving of classified document boxes before a grand jury subpoena, which is like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic if the deck chairs were marked "TOP SECRET"
  • Witness testimony from people who actually worked with Trump, which must have made for some awkward family dinners
  • Trump's own statements about election fraud that were contradicted by, well, reality

The Hearing That Wasn't Really a Hearing

Republicans on the committee spent their time suggesting Smith was politically motivated, which Smith denied with the weary patience of a teacher explaining for the fifteenth time that yes, you do need to show your work in math class.

Smith, who has served under both Republican and Democratic administrations (making him roughly as bipartisan as the post office), insisted his decisions were "based on facts and law, not political affiliation." This apparently did not satisfy critics who seemed to believe that investigating a Republican president automatically makes you a Democratic operative, by the same logic that investigating bank robbery makes you anti-money.

The Threats and the Chilling Effect

Smith also addressed the elephant in the room—or rather, the threats on his phone. Trump's social media attacks and promises of retribution created what Smith called a "chilling effect" on prosecutors and investigators. It's hard to pursue justice when the subject of your investigation is promising to make your life a living hell if he gets re-elected.

Spoiler alert: He got re-elected.

The Plot Twist Nobody Saw Coming (Except Everyone)

Here's where our legal thriller takes a turn worthy of M. Night Shyamalan: After all this evidence, all these witnesses, all these phone records and classified documents and Republican allies choosing democracy over party loyalty... the cases were dismissed following Trump's re-election.

Trump, who pleaded not guilty and called the indictment a "dark day," went on to pardon Capitol riot defendants, because if you can't beat the charges, you might as well pardon everyone else who was there too.

The Cassidy Hutchinson Subplot

In a fascinating aside, Smith addressed testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson about Trump allegedly trying to grab the steering wheel of his SUV to go to the Capitol during the riot. Investigators found conflicting accounts, which means we may never know if Trump attempted the most presidential carjacking in history. Some mysteries, it seems, are destined to remain unsolved.

What We Learned

Smith's testimony offers a masterclass in what happens when an unstoppable force (prosecutorial evidence) meets an immovable object (political reality). He had:

✓ Evidence of criminal schemes
✓ Obstruction of justice
✓ Witness testimony
✓ Phone records
✓ Classified documents
✗ A defendant who would actually face trial

The special counsel emphasized that "fraud is not protected speech," which is technically true but apparently doesn't matter if you're running for president while being investigated.

The Historical Footnote

Many observers called Smith's deposition "historic" and "pivotal," though it's unclear what exactly it pivoted toward besides a really expensive example of "what could have been." The eight-hour testimony showcased Smith's "calm and composed demeanor" and "commitment to transparency and justice," which are excellent qualities in a prosecutor, though perhaps less useful than "ability to actually prosecute."

Critics argued the deposition should have been televised live, because apparently we haven't had enough reality TV involving Trump.

The Moral of the Story

Jack Smith's testimony stands as a monument to the principle that in America, everyone is equal under the law—right up until they're not. He built cases that he believed would result in convictions, gathered evidence that would make any prosecutor salivate, and convinced Trump's own allies to testify.

And then Trump won re-election, the cases evaporated, and Smith found himself giving an eight-hour deposition explaining why he was right to pursue charges that will never be adjudicated.

It's the legal equivalent of preparing a gourmet meal, setting the table, lighting the candles, and then watching your dinner guest order pizza instead.

The Epilogue

Smith concluded his testimony by expressing concerns about retribution from Trump and his administration—a worry that seems quaint given that the alternative was apparently "don't investigate potential crimes because the suspect might win an election and be mad about it."

As for Trump, he continues to maintain his innocence, having successfully employed the legal strategy known as "run out the clock until you're president again." It's not in any law school textbooks, but you can't argue with results.

In the end, Jack Smith's testimony serves as a time capsule: a detailed record of what happens when evidence meets politics, when justice meets timing, and when a prosecutor brings proof beyond a reasonable doubt to a system that decided doubt was pretty reasonable after all.

The transcript is now available for anyone who wants to read 300 pages about a case that will never go to trial, charges that will never be adjudicated, and evidence that will never be tested in court.

Happy New Year, indeed.

Editor's Note: At press time, Smith was reportedly updating his resume and considering a career in something less stressful, like bomb disposal or lion taming.

In the end, Jack Smith's testimony serves as a time capsule: a detailed record of what happens when evidence meets politics, when justice meets timing, and when a prosecutor brings proof beyond a reasonable doubt to a system that decided doubt was pretty reasonable after all.

The transcript is now available for anyone who wants to read 300 pages about a case that will never go to trial, charges that will never be adjudicated, and evidence that will never be tested in court.

Happy New Year, indeed.

Editor's Note: At press time, Smith was reportedly updating his resume and considering a career in something less stressful, like bomb disposal or lion taming.

Parker Molloy Read Jack Smith's Testimony So You Wouldn't Have To https://dianeravitch.net/2026/01/06/parker-molloy-read-jack-smiths-testimony-so-you-dont-have-to/ via @dianeravitch 


Smith-Depo-Transcript_Redacted-w-Errata.pdf https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/2025-12/Smith-Depo-Transcript_Redacted-w-Errata.pdf 

# Summary of the Deposition of Jack Smith

## Overview

The deposition of Jack Smith, former Special Counsel, took place on December 17, 2025, before the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary. The session primarily focused on Smith's investigations into Donald Trump regarding the 2020 election interference and the handling of classified documents.

## Key Topics and Core Ideas

### 1. **Purpose of the Deposition**

- The deposition was conducted as part of the committee's oversight of the Biden-Harris administration's alleged misuse of the Justice Department for political purposes, particularly concerning the investigations involving Donald Trump. Smith's testimony was expected to clarify his role and the evidence collected during the investigations [1][5].

### 2. **Smith's Background and Investigative Approach**

- Jack Smith has a long career as a prosecutor, serving under both Republican and Democratic administrations. He emphasized that his decisions were based on facts and law, not political affiliation [16][17].

- He stated that the basis for the charges against Trump rested on the evidence collected during the investigations, which he believed would have led to convictions had the cases gone to trial [16][17].

### 3. **Investigations into Election Interference**

- Smith detailed that his investigation revealed Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election results. This included knowingly making false claims about election fraud, which were repeatedly discredited by individuals within his own party [16][17][24].

- Key evidence included communications with Republican officials who informed Trump that his fraud claims were unfounded, yet he continued to promote them [16][17][24].

### 4. **Handling of Classified Documents**

- The investigation into Trump's handling of classified documents revealed that he retained sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago estate after leaving office. Smith noted that Trump had multiple opportunities to return these documents but failed to do so [16][17][24].

- Smith described efforts to conceal classified documents, including moving boxes before a grand jury subpoena was issued, which he characterized as obstructive behavior [16][17][24].

### 5. **Legal and Ethical Considerations**

- Throughout the deposition, Smith emphasized the importance of following legal protocols and ensuring that his actions as Special Counsel were nonpartisan. He expressed concern over the potential chilling effect of political retribution against prosecutors and investigators involved in high-profile cases [16][17][24].

### 6. **Public Statements and Threats**

- Smith addressed the threats made against him and his colleagues by Trump, including derogatory remarks on social media. He indicated that such statements could be seen as attempts to intimidate witnesses and undermine the integrity of the judicial process [16][17][24].

## Key Points and Highlights

- **Testimony on Trump's Conduct**: Smith provided detailed accounts of Trump's actions and communications that indicated intent to subvert the electoral process and retain classified documents improperly [16][17][24].

- **Cooperation with the Justice Department**: He highlighted the cooperation between his office and the Department of Justice, particularly regarding adherence to legal standards and election year sensitivities [16][17][24].

- **Impact of Political Climate**: Smith expressed concerns about the implications of political pressures on law enforcement and the judiciary, asserting that public trust in these institutions is vital for democracy [16][17][24].

- **Conclusion of the Investigation**: Smith reiterated his commitment to conducting a thorough investigation based on evidence and law, independent of political influence, and expressed a desire for transparency in his findings [16][17][24].

This summary encapsulates the main themes and findings from the deposition of Jack Smith, reflecting on the complexities of the investigations into Donald Trump's actions surrounding the 2020 election and the subsequent handling of classified documents.


The video covers Jack Smith's deposition discussing his role as special counsel, legal restrictions on his testimony, and his handling of sensitive cases, including the January 6 investigation and classified documents related to Donald Trump.

Detailed Summary for [Jack Smith Deposition](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR-bhPzQYUE) by [Monica](https://monica.im)


  [00:00](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR-bhPzQYUE&t=0) The deposition of Mr. Smith is being conducted with specific legal restrictions in place, emphasizing the importance of adhering to laws regarding the disclosure of sensitive information.

  - Introduction of Mr. Smith's deposition and acknowledgment of legal constraints.}

- Mr. Smith is committed to providing information while respecting legal limitations on disclosure.}

- Key restrictions on Mr. Smith's testimony, including prohibitions against divulging certain information.}

- Clarification on the interpretation of grand jury secrecy and its implications for Mr. Smith's testimony.}

- Discussion of specific content from the special counsel's report that Mr. Smith is restricted from discussing.}

      

[01:02:49](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR-bhPzQYUE&t=3769.44) The deposition discusses the procedural requirements for prosecuting various types of cases, emphasizing the need for consultation with specific divisions within the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for sensitive matters.

  - Overview of prosecutorial requirements for tax cases, necessitating consultation with the tax division.}

- Requirements for handling national security-related cases, specifically regarding classified documents, which require approval from the national security division.}

- Discussion on the protocols for sensitive political matters and the role of the Attorney General in approving investigations and prosecutions.}

- Explanation of the FBI's regulations regarding investigations involving Congress members, highlighting the need for director approval before proceeding.}

- Emphasis on the importance of public integrity consultations before seeking toll records, establishing a policy that aligns with DOJ practices.}

      

[02:05:14](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR-bhPzQYUE&t=7514.149) In this segment, Jack Smith discusses his motivations for accepting the special counsel position and addresses the challenges he faced during his tenure. He emphasizes his qualifications and experience as a prosecutor while dismissing any political motivations behind his role.

  - Jack Smith expresses his interest in the special counsel position, believing he was the right person for the challenging job.}

- He confirms that he had no reservations about accepting the role despite facing significant public scrutiny and attacks.}

- Smith explains how he managed the pressures of public opinion, focusing on the work and the well-being of his staff rather than the external noise.}

- He firmly denies any political motivations for his role, stating that his decisions were not influenced by a desire to affect the upcoming presidential election.}

      

[03:07:52](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR-bhPzQYUE&t=11272.07) The deposition focuses on Jack Smith's appointment as special counsel, his recollection of the swearing-in process, and his interactions surrounding that period.

  - Discussion about the timing of Jack Smith's appointment in relation to President Trump's announcement.}

- Smith confirms he was sworn in as special counsel while he was in the Netherlands.}

- Smith recalls that individuals visited him shortly after his appointment, but he does not remember who administered the oath.}

- Inquiry about the total cost of Smith's probe, which he indicates he does not know.}

      

[04:10:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR-bhPzQYUE&t=15030.229) The deposition discusses the involvement of Rudy Giuliani and others in attempting to delay the certification of the vote through false claims, highlighting a broader conspiracy to undermine the electoral process.

  - Rudy Giuliani left voicemails for senators containing knowingly false claims aimed at delaying the vote certification.}

- There were multiple instances of communication with the White House regarding false claims made by the president and his associates.}

- Evidence from Department of Justice officials indicated that Donald Trump instructed them to claim the election was corrupt, revealing his perspective on the situation.}

- The investigation considers the extent of contacts between Trump and various officials, emphasizing their relevance to understanding the conspiracy.}

      

[05:14:58](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR-bhPzQYUE&t=18898.4) In this deposition, Jack Smith discusses his communications with Marshall Miller regarding his role as special counsel and his decision-making process related to accepting the position. He clarifies previous discussions about other cases and his willingness to return to the U.S. for the right opportunity.

  - Jack Smith addresses his prior conversations with Marshall Miller about the special counsel position.}

- He clarifies that he declined to work on another case before accepting the position of special counsel.}

- Smith expresses that while he enjoyed his previous work, he was open to returning to the U.S. for the right opportunity due to family reasons.}

- He confirms that he does not recall any communications with the Michigan Attorney General.}

      

[06:23:25](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR-bhPzQYUE&t=23005.44) In this segment of the deposition, Mr. Smith discusses the investigation related to January 6th, addressing questions about whether certain individuals were interviewed or testified. He emphasizes the constraints imposed by a judicial injunction, particularly regarding Director Cash Patel's involvement, and clarifies that the Supreme Court's decision does not exonerate President Trump's actions leading up to the events of January 6th.

  - Mr. Smith is questioned about interviews conducted during the January 6th investigation, specifically mentioning notable figures.}

- Mr. Smith indicates he cannot discuss specific details due to a judicial injunction.}

- Mr. Smith is asked if the Supreme Court's decision on executive immunity exonerates President Trump, to which he responds negatively and is prompted to explain.}

      

[07:18:21](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR-bhPzQYUE&t=26301.43) The deposition focuses on Donald Trump's handling of classified documents, particularly regarding military operations and the security clearance of individuals involved. It also touches on the FBI's actions related to document retrieval and the misordering of documents from Mar-a-Lago.

  - Discussion about Trump's statements regarding the document he was showing and the reactions of others present in the room.}

- Inquiry into whether individuals who received information about military operations had the necessary security clearance.}

- Questions regarding the FBI's search of Trump's residence and whether they retrieved all classified documents he retained after the 2020 election.}

- Transitioning off the record to discuss the misordering of documents seized from Mar-a-Lago and the implications of this misordering.}