Latest News and Comment from Education

Friday, November 18, 2016

Sickout Leaders Make a Bid to Re-Energize Detroit Teachers Union | Labor Notes

Sickout Leaders Make a Bid to Re-Energize Detroit Teachers Union | Labor Notes:

Sickout Leaders Make a Bid to Re-Energize Detroit Teachers Union



“Fired Up or Burned Out?” asks a new slate running for office in the Detroit Teachers union (DFT). “Which one are you?”

Escalating Actions

In November 2015, thousands of Detroit teachers used their “professional development day” to go to the state Capitol in Lansing for a rally against overcrowded classes and unilateral health care cost increases.
That fall teachers held rolling sick-outs.
On January 11 more than 60 schools, out of 97, had to close when teachers called in “sick and tired,” and on January 20, 88 schools. Individuals and the local were served with injunctions.
In February, teachers held “walk-ins,” where they invited parents and the media, gathered before school in union T-shirts, and walked into their schools in unison.
In May, Emergency Manager Steven Rhodes warned that the district could run out of money to pay teachers. That led to two days of sick-outs—in all but three of the district’s schools—forcing Rhodes to assure teachers he would “honor that legal obligation.”
The goal of Dedicated Teachers for Fairness and Equity (DTFE) is to “re-energize our members,” said presidential candidate Asenath Jones, a 19-year world history teacher. Ballots were mailed to members November 14 and will be counted December 3.
“We’ve taken so many hits,” said vice presidential candidate Marietta Elliott, who teaches at a K-8 school focused on students’ African and African American heritage.
The Detroit school district is down to 46,000 students after being placed under “emergency management” by the Michigan governor. A succession of emergency managers has left the district in debt as more families opt for charter schools. Charter schools now enroll more Detroit students than public schools do.
Some teachers on the 13-member slate helped organize a wave of sickouts last school year, called to shed light on the woeful conditions of Detroit schools.
Teachers started organizing the actions in a small number of schools. “Sickouts had been maybe three at a time,” Elliott said. “Then [Emergency Manager] Darnell Earley called teachers ‘unethical.’ We had a conference call with 400 to 500 teachers on the call. We organized by forwarding text messages.” A January 20 day of action shut down 88 of the district’s 97 schools.
Teachers showed mold, water damage, broken equipment, and mice-infested classrooms to the media. And they didn’t fail to mention pay cuts and abusive teacher evaluation systems.
Sixth-grade English teacher Vanessa Dawson said that in her school, computers that students use to take the new M-STEP standardized test run too slow. On a hot day, she said, students will push any key out of frustration. “We give them popsicles to try to keep them on task,” she said.
Jones said the year’s sickouts, which were organized independent of union officers, not only shed light on students’ and teachers’ conditions, they lit a fire under members who’d been intimidated about exposing them.
“We had a union, but the union had taken a more passive approach,” said Dawson. “The times require aggressive fighters and strategic planning.”
The incumbent United for Teacher Rights slate has held office for most of the past two decades.
DTFE emphasizes that it will get teachers organized at the building level. “We want to support building reps and the school committees,” made up of a half-dozen teachers in each school, said U.S. history teacher Brian Diskin. “To reunify a district that’s lost a lot of zeal, you have to build from the ground up.”
Jones suggested that the union could hold monthly meetings for building reps to come together across schools, and establish sister schools to support each other.
Elliott emphasizes that if DTFE wins, the union will not only be urging members who have dropped out to recommit (Michigan is a right-to-work state), it will also be seeking more sources of funds for the starved school system.
“It’s about putting kids first, then teachers,” said Dawson.
Meet Detroit teachers and other local activists December 3 at the Labor Notes Troublemakers SchoolClick here for details and to register. Sickout Leaders Make a Bid to Re-Energize Detroit Teachers Union | Labor Notes:

Trial Date Looming, Trump’s Lawyers Say President-Elect Too Busy - Bloomberg Politics

Trial Date Looming, Trump’s Lawyers Say President-Elect Too Busy - Bloomberg Politics:

Trial Date Looming, Trump’s Lawyers Say President-Elect Too Busy



Donald Trump is pulling out the stops to stall a fraud trial over his defunct real estate “university” until he’s president.
Having earlier persuaded a federal judge to delay the trial until after last week’s election, the president-elect now says he has too many responsibilities as he prepares for his inauguration to be diverted. And if that doesn’t work, he may challenge how the jury pool was selected.
Trump’s lawyers head to court Friday to convince the judge in San Diego to put the case on hold until next year. That’s the same Indiana-born judge who Trump attacked during the campaign as being biased against him because of his Mexican-American heritage.
U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, for his part, has said he thinks the best option would be for Trump and plaintiffs claiming they were cheated by his real estate seminars to settle the case and avoid what would be the first trial in U.S. history to feature testimony from a president-elect.
If the trial goes ahead on Nov. 28, Trump’s lawyers show no signs of rolling over. They have already contested which witnesses can testify for the students and objected to Trump’s own comments about the case while campaigning from being mentioned to jurors. They’re even questioning the basics of which Southern California residents are called for jury duty and whether the process is random enough.
Their immediate goal is to show Curiel that the former reality television star preparing for his first elective office has too much on his plate for a two-week trial.

Briefings, Appointments

“President-elect Trump must receive daily security briefings, make executive appointments -- ultimately, thousands -- and establish relationships with appointees, members of Congress, governors, and foreign leaders," his lawyers said in a Nov. 12 filing. "He must also develop important policy priorities.”
Lawyers for the plaintiffs counter that any delay would be a “slippery slope” because Trump’s life is only going to get more complicated and unpredictable.
On Wednesday, lead Trump lawyer Daniel Petrocelli launched an initial salvo in what may be a coming challenge to the process by which nine citizens will be chosen to hear the Trump University case. Citing Trump’s right to a jury reflecting “a fair cross section of the community,” the attorney asked the court for granular details on how a pool of 100 prospective jurors were summoned and selected.
Lawyers for the former students said in response that Trump’s request is asking too much, too late.
The Trump team “waited until the eve of trial to request a far more broad and intrusive collection of juror information than is typically provided even in criminal cases,” the Trial Date Looming, Trump’s Lawyers Say President-Elect Too Busy - Bloomberg Politics:
Image result for big education ape trump university

Court ruling limits charter schools' expansions with satellite campuses outside their territory | Northern California Record

Court ruling limits charter schools' expansions with satellite campuses outside their territory | Northern California Record:

Court ruling limits charter schools' expansions with satellite campuses outside their territory

SAN DIEGO — A California appellate court recently ruled that charter schools cannot expand throughout their home county by opening satellite campuses outside of the district that granted them authorization.
The ruling was considered a win for California's school districts that have seen student numbers and state attendance funds decrease when charters opened “resource centers” in their boundaries without the district’s approval or oversight.
For charter advocates, the ruling is a disappointment. They say it will disrupt the education of more than 150,000 independent study charter school students unless the case is appealed to the California Supreme Court.
“We are very disappointed in the decision,” Ricardo Soto, senior vice president of Legal Advocacy and general counsel for California Charter Schools Association told the Northern California Record. “We think the decision goes against many years of the previous interpretation about the operation of charter schools up and down the state, which aren’t classroom based. They are independent study students in resource centers in districts where they are authorized.”
The ruling comes from the 3rd District Court of Appeal’s decision to overturn a lower court’s decision in lawsuit the Anderson Union High School District filed. The Redding-based district claimed in its suit the Shasta Charter Academy illegally started a resource center in its jurisdiction.
The lower court ruled in the charter’s favor, saying it’s legal to operate a resource center in the nearby Anderson district to allow independent study students an opportunity to use computers, receive tutoring and complete schoolwork in a classroom setting. While the state education code allows independent study charters to operate satellite campuses in their home district or nearby counties, the law say nothing about whether a charter may operate the same type of centers outside of their home district, which is why the lower court’s ruling was overturned.
“I think the court took a very strict reading of the statue and didn’t consider the policy arguments why the statute should have been interpreted to permit the location of these resource centers,” Soto said.
While the ruling is a positive for the various school districts, the ones who are impacted the most are the students who attend the charter schools and their families, according to Soto. Tens of thousands of students depend on the charter schools that operate the resource centers. The decision also hurts those who run the centers themselves, because oftentimes the locations are private and leased, and there are financial consequences for organizations that have to break a lease because they can’t keep the center open.
Even though the school districts have the current law on their side, the Charter School Association still plans to appeal the recent ruling. One of the charter schools in the case has already submitted a petition for a rehearing with the Court of Appeals, which is essentially a precursor to an appeal, according to Soto. The charter school organization’s attorney has already preparing to file an appeal.
“These schools typically serve families of students that are either not succeeding in the regular pubic school system where they are located, or, in some cases, they are serving families within the public school system through these resource centers and charter schools that wouldn’t have otherwise accessed the public school system,” Soto said. “It’s unfortunate the school districts have targeted these programs to try to close them down when families are choosing to go there to try to access the public school system in California. I think it’s a sad commentary that the school districts might be more interested in protecting their territory than figuring out a way to serve these families better.” Court ruling limits charter schools' expansions with satellite campuses outside their territory | Northern California Record:
 Big Education Ape: STATE APPELLATE COURT LIMITS CHARTER SCHOOL CAMPUSES - The San Diego Union Tribune - http://bigeducationape.blogspot.com/2016/10/state-appellate-court-limits-charter.html

 
How Goldilocks Opened a Charter School That Nobody Wanted

Big Education Ape: Charter School Approval Flea Flicker: Three charter schools closed by CPS file appeals with stat... http://bit.ly/1QGhKNd

Big Education Ape: Glendale Unified board denies charter school plans; petitioners say they will appeal to county -... http://bit.ly/1P9tvbD

Big Education Ape: Flea Flicker: Rocketship appeals to state board to build school in Concord - ContraCostaTimes http://bit.ly/1RVCrnq

Big Education Ape: Flea Flicker: Should state be able to approve charter schools in Virginia? - Daily Press http://bit.ly/1QPtgEg
Big Education Ape: Washington Charter Schools Find Another Source Of Public Money | KUOW News and Information http://bit.ly/1QPtknC

Rep. Garamendi introduces ‘American Food for American Schools’ bill

Rep. Garamendi introduces ‘American Food for American Schools’ bill:

Rep. Garamendi introduces ‘American Food for American Schools’ bill

Image result for chinese food take out for kids

Rep. John Garamendi, D-Solano, wants to strengthen the “Buy American” provisions of the National School Lunch Act.
To that end, the congressman Wednesday introduced H.R. 6299, the “American Food for American Schools” Act.
If passed, it is designed to bring more accountability and transparency to federal laws governing school lunches, he noted in a press release.
Under current law, school districts are required to use American products for school lunches wherever practical; however, they may request a waiver from the Department of Agriculture if the cost of “domestic sourcing is significantly higher,” according to the written statement. Unfortunately, these waiver requests do not always occur, he pointed out in the written statement.
Garamendi’s legislation would legally require school food-service providers to seek a waiver in order to use foreign commodities and products. Additionally, waiver requests must be made available to the public.
“One of the best ways to make sure our kids have local produce is to enforce the existing ‘Buy American’ provisions of the National School Lunch Act,” said Garamendi, who represents the sprawling, mostly rural 3rd Congressional district. “These provisions are designed to ensure taxpayer dollars support U.S. jobs and businesses, and have the added benefit of increasing the amount of American-grown food our children enjoy through the school lunch program. We have seen too many instances of school districts, including some right here in my district, importing foreign food unnecessarily without the proper disclosure.”
He noted recent recalls of imported foods that led to disease outbreaks, when that same produce could have been grown in California, where food safety standards are among the highest in the world.
The legislation has already earned support from key agricultural groups, according to Garamendi, who owns a ranch in Walnut Grove, where he lives.
“When local school districts use taxpayer dollars to purchase and import food products that are readily available here, it is a real slap in the face to American farmers who are required to comply with a host of laws and regulations to ensure they are producing the safest supply of food in the world,” said Rich Hudgins, president and CEO of the California Canning Peach Association.
He added, “Yet China is notorious for environmental, human rights and food safety violations so why are we using taxpayer dollars to buy their food products and risk the health and safety of our children?”
Rob Larew, senior vice-president of public policy and communications for the National Farmers Union, said: “The school lunch laws were designed to ensure all school-age children have access to high-quality, nutritious food products, like those grown and produced by U.S. farmers and ranchers. By improving transparency and enforcement of the ‘Buy American’ provisions, through the American Food for American Schools Act, we can better support both American agriculture and child nutrition.”
This latest House resolution is not the first time Garamendi addressed the issue.
In 2015, it was reported that the Sacramento City Unified School District had been importing canned peaches from China. While these purchases do not appear to have violated the “Buy American” provision because of cost differences, it did expose a lack of enforcement of the provisions requiring school districts to seek a waiver with the USDA under these circumstances. Garamendi’s involvement reportedly led the school district to change its acquisition policies.Rep. Garamendi introduces ‘American Food for American Schools’ bill:

 Image result for kids say yuck to school lunch

Diane Ravitch: Trump Education Policy | Accuracy.Org

Trump Education Policy | Accuracy.Org:

Trump Education Policy

Image result for big education ape Diane Ravitch

Education was not a subject of great importance during the recent Presidential campaign. It did not come up during the debates and was not often mentioned during the general election. Hillary Clinton ran with the strong support of the two national teachers’ unions and promised to support schools and teachers. Donald Trump announced his education policy while visiting a for-profit charter school in Ohio. He pledged to divert $20 billion in federal funds for school choice, whether charters or vouchers for religious schools. He also promised on several occasions to “get rid of” Common Core, the controversial standards that were widely adopted by the states during Obama’s second term.
There has been widespread speculation about who might be picked as Secretary of Education. And there has been widespread speculation about whether the Trump administration would either trim the Department of Education or eliminate it altogether.
Some of the names that have been prominently mentioned are Michelle Rhee, former chancellor of the public schools of the District of Columbia; Eva Moskowitz, chief executive officer of the Success Academy charter schools in New York City; and Williamson (Bill) Evers of the Hoover Institution.
Rhee and Moskowitz would certainly be zealous proponents of school choice. Selecting either of them would be a thumb in the eyes of the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers, who campaigned mightily for Clinton. Both have tangled with the unions and made clear their distaste for public schools and for teachers’ unions.
Rhee is a fierce warrior, who is known for firing teachers and principals who don’t raise test scores. Her negatives: a cheating scandal in D.C. during her tenure that was never fully investigated, and her husband, Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, who has admitted to indiscretions with young girls in the past.
Moskowitz’s charter schools boast very high test scores, but critics say she gets them by pushing out kids with low scores and excluding children with disabilities and English language learners. Taking the job with Trump would be a big salary cut for Moskowitz, who now makes double the salary of a Cabinet Secretary. And it is not clear whether there is any number two in her organization to keep it running without her.
Evers has been a crusader for traditional math instruction for many years. He has fought against the Common Core. As part of the conservative Koret Task Force on Education at the Hoover Institution, he has written widely about curriculum and instruction and he served on a local school board in California. He served as an education advisor to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq and subsequently as an Assistant Secretary of Education under President George W. Bush.
The Common Core divides these three candidates. Rhee and Moskowitz are strong supporters of the Common Core, which they implemented in the schools they have commanded. Breitbart News has already reported that parents who supported Trump are worried that he might back down on his opposition to Common Core by appointing either of them.
If President-elect Trump wants to take a swat at the teachers’ unions and supporters of public schools, he can’t go wrong with Rhee or Moskowitz. If he wants to show his determination to remove federal support for Common Core, Evers is a good bet.
Whoever he chooses may be tasked with the job of downsizing or closing down the Department of Education. That doesn’t mean the programs it runs will disappear, just that they will be shifted to another department. For many years, education was part of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and education programs might be returned there or dispersed elsewhere.
Whoever Trump chooses for Secretary — and it might be someone totally different from the three mentioned here — these will be challenging times for public education …
Trump has declared his determination to privatize public schools, to the extent that federal funds can encourage that outcome. No high-performing nation in the world has privatized its public schools; all have strong and equitably resourced public schools, staffed by certified teachers, not well-meaning amateurs. The two nations that did buy into the free-market privatization ideology — Sweden and Chile — have regretted it. Instead of better education, they got greater segregation of students by race, income, religion, and social status.
The threat to public schools is real under a Trump administration. In the recent election, voters in Massachusetts and Georgia overwhelmingly defeated ballot measures to increase the number of charter schools. Trump won Georgia, but the voters of Georgia turned down the same education proposal that Trump wants to fund.
Under the terms of current law, states have the power to decide how to use federal funds that are not tied to a mandatory program. If Trump releases $20 billion to the states, it will be left to governors and legislatures to decide whether to protect their public schools. Some deeply conservative states might decide to side with privatization, but it is not at all clear that the parents and local school districts will go along, even in Republican-controlled states.
Ravitch is author of many books, including Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America’s Public Schools and The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education. She is a research professor of education at New York University and served as Assistant Secretary of Education and Counselor to the Secretary of Education from 1991-1993 under the George H. W. Bush administration. She now blogs at dianeravitch.netTrump Education Policy | Accuracy.Org:
Image result for big education ape Diane Ravitch

Finding optimism for #oklaed despite SQ 779's defeat - NonDoc

Finding optimism for #oklaed despite SQ 779's defeat - NonDoc:

Finding optimism for #oklaed despite SQ 779’s defeat

779's defeat

(Editor’s note: Today, NonDoc presents two examinations of Oklahoma’s education system following the defeat of State Question 779 by voters Nov. 8. On one hand, James Davenport writes about how Oklahoma needs a new system entirely. On the other, John Thompson writes below that education advocates have reason to be optimistic despite obstacles.)
Former state Speaker of the House Steve Lewis opened his Nov. 4 article for Oklahoma Policy Institute with the observation:
For a state with a well-deserved reputation for loathing government, we Oklahomans sure spend a lot of time, energy and money governing ourselves.
Weirdly, that’s the good news! After a two-decade campaign to shrink government to the size where it can be drowned in the bathtub, Oklahoma City voters (at least) are pushing back.

2016’s victories in governing ourselves

Not long ago, it looked like Oklahoma was bound to follow North Dakota with an overwhelming victory for the so-called Right to Farm amendment, but corporate agriculture’s SQ 777 was defeated.
Meanwhile, Oklahoma’s incarceration rate is No. 2 in the nation, and we are No. 1 in the world for imprisoning women, but the passage of SQs 780 and 781 make simple possession of drugs a misdemeanor and allocate the savings from reduced prison sentences to local communities for mental health and drug treatment.
And who anticipated such a victory against SQ 790, which was a stalking horse for displaying the Ten Commandments at the Capitol? An ecumenical coalition successfully defended the First Amendment!
Last, although it was a terribly disappointing election for teachers across the state, the OKC metropolitan area sent two Democratic educators, Mickey Dollens and Forest Bennett, to the Legislature. We also re-elected Rep. Cyndi Munson (D-OKC) and elected Colin Walke, both Dems.

SQ 779’s defeat illustrates divisions

On the other hand, the surprising defeat of SQ 779 illustrates some of the divisions that Finding optimism for #oklaed despite SQ 779's defeat - NonDoc:


Charter School Industry – Big Donations to Malloy, No Oversight from Malloy administration - Wait What?

Charter School Industry – Big Donations to Malloy, No Oversight from Malloy administration - Wait What?:

Charter School Industry – Big Donations to Malloy, No Oversight from Malloy administration



When it comes to Governor Dannel Malloy and the Charter School Industry, two things are certain.  The campaign money from charter school advocates has been flowing into Malloy’s political operation at record levels while Malloy’s administration has been turning a blind eye to the fact that charter schools are violating Connecticut laws, regulations and policies.
Even the most cursory review of state and federal campaign finance reports reveal that Malloy’s pro-charter school agenda continues to pay “big dividends.”
Major donors associated with ConnCAN, the Achievement First charter school chain and other corporate education reform entities have donated in excess of $250,000 to Malloy’s Democratic State Central Committee in just the last four years.
Leading the way has been Jonathan Sackler, a member of both ConnCAN’s and Achievement First’s Board of Directors.  Sackler and his immediate family have given Malloy’s state Democratic committee more than $116,000 and that doesn’t even count the donations that have come from Sackler’s political action committee, the Purdue Pharma PAC.
In addition to Sackler’s money, charter school executives and the financial backers of the corporate education reform movement have donated tens of thousands more to Malloy’s political aspirations in recent years
And as education advocate and school finance expert Wendy Lecker observed in an article Charter School Industry – Big Donations to Malloy, No Oversight from Malloy administration - Wait What?:

Image result for big education ape malloy

Trump’s Immigration Proposals Threaten the Lives of Young Adults, Adolescents, and Children | janresseger

Trump’s Immigration Proposals Threaten the Lives of Young Adults, Adolescents, and Children | janresseger:

Trump’s Immigration Proposals Threaten the Lives of Young Adults, Adolescents, and Children

Image result for Trump’s Immigration Proposals Threaten the Lives of Young Adults, Adolescents, and Children

President-elect Donald Trump says his immigration policy is about building a wall between the U.S. and Mexico (that Mexico will supposedly pay for) and deporting immigrants with criminal records.
He has also threatened to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, by which President Obama protected the rights of the young adults—those known as Dreamers—who came to the United States as young children but who, as non-citizens, have struggled to qualify for in-state tuition and scholarships at their state colleges and universities and even to get work permits.  These are young people who have very likely known only the United States as home and who speak English at school and in the workplace. The DACA program— established by executive order—could be immediately overturned by our new president.
It is important to get one thing really clear about immigration: any changes in DACA or any mass expulsion of immigrant families will have the most tragic consequences for two groups: children and young adults.  There are two groups of vulnerable young people—adolescents and young adults who were brought here by their undocumented parents and who remain undocumented all these years later—and the children who were born here as U.S. citizens but who are the dependent children of undocumented parents who may be expelled.  Both groups of young people face a frightening future under President-elect Trump’s proposed immigration policies. Enormous linguistic, educational, cultural and personal challenges loom.
Under President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), young people living in the shadows were finally in a position to qualify for a Social Security Card and access to higher education.  The Los Angeles Times reported on Sunday: “An estimated 742,000 so-called Dreamers—those given protection under the program—live in the U.S.  Roughly one out of Trump’s Immigration Proposals Threaten the Lives of Young Adults, Adolescents, and Children | janresseger:


Democrats Warned Not to Help Trump Enact Their Own Damn School Policies | gadflyonthewallblog

Democrats Warned Not to Help Trump Enact Their Own Damn School Policies | gadflyonthewallblog:

Democrats Warned Not to Help Trump Enact Their Own Damn School Policies


It must be hard to be a neoliberal Democrat in Donald Trump’s America.
Almost every policy decision you favor is also on the Republican President-elect’s to-do list. But if you work with him, you’ll ruin the illusion that there’s a difference between the two of you.
DFER is a hedge fund managers’ pro-charter advocacy group. Despite it’s name, one would think the organization would be a natural ally for pro-school-choice Trump.
But, wait a minute.
I thought one of the first things Trump promised to do once he took the Oval Office was close the Department of Education.
Weeeeeelllllllll…. That’s so November 10th.
He’s already walking back that whooper just like he’ll soon have to admit that the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) doesn’t allow him to end Common Core – another one of his campaign promises. Ending the Core is up to the states (has been for months, yet most Republican controlled legislatures just can’t bring themselves to do it for some reason).
It’s easy to see why Trump has had a Come To Jesus moment about the Department of Education. If he really wants to add $20 billion in school-choice programs, as he promised on the campaign trail, a big government office that hands out bundles of cash in return for states enacting his personal policy desires sure would come in Democrats Warned Not to Help Trump Enact Their Own Damn School Policies | gadflyonthewallblog:


CURMUDGUCATION: The Faux Progressive Polka

CURMUDGUCATION: The Faux Progressive Polka:

The Faux Progressive Polka


It has always been one of the curiosities of the reformster movement-- the insistence that they are Progressives  and Democrats, while they have embraced and pushed policies linked to the privatization of public education.

Image result for Polka animated gif

How could it be that Bush II's ed policy could flow seamlessly into Obama's? How could it be that Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton saw each other as simpatico when it came to education?

The answer, of course, is that ed reform has been driven in large part by faux progressives. Probably the most spectacular example would be Democrats For Education Reform (DFER), a title in which the only accurate word is "for." Here, from his filmic ed reform magnum opus "A Right Denied," is DFER founder and hedge fund giant Whitney Tilson's explanation of how they decided to put the D in DFER:

“The real problem, politically, was not the Republican party, it was the Democratic party. So it dawned on us, over the course of six months or a year, that it had to be an inside job. The main obstacle to education reform was moving the Democratic party, and it had to be Democrats who did it, it had to be an inside job. So that was the thesis behind the organization. And the name – and the name was critical – we get a lot of flack for the name. You know, “Why are you Democrats for education reform? That’s very exclusionary. I mean, certainly there are Republicans in favor of education reform.” And we said, “We agree.” In fact, our natural allies, in many cases, are Republicans on this crusade, but the problem is not Republicans. We don’t need to convert the Republican party to our point of view…”

But now the head of DFER has this to say about serving in a Trump administration.

It is, generally speaking, an honor for any person of any political persuasion to be asked by the 
CURMUDGUCATION: The Faux Progressive Polka:



What Do German Schools Teach Kids about Human Dignity and their Political History? - Teacher in a Strange Land - Education Week Teacher

What Do German Schools Teach Kids about Human Dignity and their Political History? - Teacher in a Strange Land - Education Week Teacher:

What Do German Schools Teach Kids about Human Dignity and their Political History?

Image result for What Do German Schools

It may have been Ernest Boyer who declared that public education functions as a stage where Americans test and play out their deepest values and convictions. No matter who said it first--as a 30-year veteran of the classroom, I can attest to the absolute truthfulness of that statement.
Everything that happens around us--electionsnational tragediesmedia uglinesssocial unrestxenophobia and religious prejudicesexism and racism--shows up in public schools. Ask any teacher about keeping the outside world out of classroom dynamics. Ask any child, even a first-grader, if this election has made an appearance in her classroom. Ask any scolding pundit or self-righteous parent just how to stick to phonics and fractions when the very ground has shifted.
Can't be done. And when (not if) you try--teachers are rightly terrified of stepping out line, these days--the atmosphere in the room ranges from "temporary distraction" to "buried discussion" to "suppressed rage."  That's rage fromIMG_1087.JPG all sides, by the way--it doesn't matter whether you're a teacher in the self-satisfied white suburbs, or the white-hot, fearful urban centers. Adults are messing with kids' future, hiding the elephant in the room, and students are aware of this.
This might be a good place to quote Adolf HitlerHe alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.
So--a word about playing the Hitler card. I was--justifiably--criticized, on one occasion, for raising the specter of actual fascism in school politics. This is not a thing to ever, ever take lightly, I know. I also recognize that hyperbole always weakens an argument.
But I want to write here about a nation that once had a lot of explaining to do on that front, and has--from available evidence--been able, over the long span of three generations, to reconcile their role in what happened in the 1930s and 1940s in Germany, triggering global catastrophe. Maybe we ought to pay attention.
Two years ago, I had the revelatory experience of touring the Nazi Rally Grounds in Nuremberg and visiting the Documentation Center there, with an extraordinarily well-informed German guide, a doctoral student who was moonlighting as "World War II tour" escort and educator. It was a six-hour tour, and pricey--and you could sense the Americans we were traveling with grow weary of the information dump, wondering if the Christmas shop would still be open once the bus dropped us back off on the restored town square.
We wandered around the rally grounds and the manmade lake surrounding the building, once a Nazi headquarters and now the site of an extensive display of memorabilia and analysis. Our guide began by telling us that what we were looking at, the impressive, forbidding structure across the placid lake, was not a museum.
Museums are for sharing cherished cultural artifacts, he said. There are plenty of those in Germany--and we encourage you to visit them. A documentation center, on the other hand, is a public record of a human failure--one for which Germany was responsible. It was Germans' moral duty to keep the archived memory alive--at the Documentation Center, in concentration camps and courtrooms.
I wasn't taking notes--I signed up for the tour with little foreknowledge of what I would see or how it would impact me--but I remember a great deal of his running spiel. Our guide was an earnest, youngish man in a plaid shirt, crooked tie and glasses, who carried two notebooks full of tabbed information and could give the veteran who asked precise information about range of Messerschmitt war planes.
A lot of the questions, in fact, came from men asking about military equipment and strategies--not so many about the Holocaust or impact of the rise of fascism in Europe. Asked whether Austria had a similar urge to document their own involvement with racial and religious discrimination, our guide made a face and declined to comment.  Lesson #1 is that we speak for ourselves, he said.
He spoke of regional political differences, pre-War--how a country in acute financial distress could be utterly divided about causes and solutions. He talked about generational differences--and how it took Germans three full generations to understand how a handful of men turned a fundamentally decent people into killers, persuading those for whom horrific prejudice was just not a deal-breaker, if  Germany could be restored to greatness. 
His grandparents, he said, were impressionable young people, just starting their family, during the rise of the Third Reich. They were gone now, but as a child he had been instructed by his parents not to listen to what Oma said about the terrible war years. She's old, he'd been told. We'll respect her for that. Don't ask, and maybe she won't tell.
His parents were the generation that bore their parents' guilt. Then, as grandchildren of the Nazi legacy, his generation could finally claim to have actively worked to make sure it never happened again. In Germany, at least. Questioned, he shared extensive data about the skinhead movement, a serious worry for the moderate government. But then he compared incidents of far-right violence in Germany to gun violence in America, a sobering contrast for anyone who was inclined to feel superior.
Someone asked the obvious question: How on earth could so many rational people buy into Hitler's psychosis?
Ah, he said. This is where people from every nation must pay attention. Hitler was a genius at using available media and technology. Crystal radios were made cheap, and the same sticky message--an alternate, economically driven message of national pride-- was pumped into all homes. "News" was what the party decided.
Public rallies were enormously effective--the Nuremberg site was chosen because it was cheap and easy to get to by train, and surrounding farms could house families and large groups of people from a single town, camping and sleeping in haylofts. Everyone could participate--government was no longer centered in the industrial, better-educated north. A common enemy had been clearly identified, the future was brighter because there was a plan--a plan for everyone, not merely the political elites.  The ultimate community-building success.
A man asked about the crumbling rally grounds--an "amazing historical facility." Had there been any thought to restoring it? Our guide's face darkened. "Let it rot," he said. "Good riddance."
I asked--as a teacher---what German schoolchildren were taught about Germany's role in World War II. It was part of their national curriculum, he told us. They began with equity and community in early childhood, accepting differences and playing together. When students were 12, they read Anne FrankMedia literacy and logic and an intense focus on preparation for good, attainable, satisfying jobs were part of the program, in addition to history, economics and the predictable disciplines. We do not avoid our history, he said.
So what do you do in America, he asked?
Last week, an honored fellow at the U.S. Holocaust Museum, and recognized expert on World War II was suspended from his job, after a parent complained when he pointed out parallels between Nazi Germany and the 2016 election to students. It took a national petition and a global spotlight to get him reinstated.
Today, President Obama and Chancellor Merkel issued a "joint defense of strong American leadership in global security, free trade and combating global warming while cautioning against cozying up to Russia, in what appeared to serve as a message to President-elect Donald Trump."


Thursday, November 17, 2016

Who’s Protecting the Children in the Age of Trump? | The Merrow Report

Who’s Protecting the Children in the Age of Trump? | The Merrow Report:

Who’s Protecting the Children in the Age of Trump?