Latest News and Comment from Education

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Charter Schools Program Discretionary/Competitive Grants

Charter Schools Program
CHARTER SCHOOLS PROGRAM


Current Section Purpose
 Office of Innovation and Improvement Home
Purpose


ED PROGRAMS
Search or print all Department programs.
MORE RESOURCES
Join Our Listserv
A Commitment to Quality National Charter School Policy Forum Report
download files PDF (1.28MB)


CFDA Number: 84.282
Program Type: Discretionary/Competitive Grants
Also Known As: Charter Schools, Public Charter Schools Program, CSP

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

This program provides financial assistance for the planning, program design, and initial implementation of charter schools, and the dissemination of information on charter schools. Grants are available, on a competitive basis, to SEAs in states that have charter school laws; SEAs in turn make subgrants to developers of charter schools who have applied for a charter. If an eligible SEA elects not to participate or if its application for funding is not approved, the Department can make grants directly to charter school developers.

TYPES OF PROJECTS

An eligible applicant that receives a grant or subgrant may use the funds only for post-award planning and design of the education program of a charter school. It may carry out such activities as the refinement of the desired education results, the refinement of the methods for measuring progress toward achieving those results, and the initial implementation of the charter school. Implementation may include informing the community about the charter school and acquiring necessary equipment, materials, and supplies. Other eligible operational costs that cannot be met by state and local sources also may be covered. A state may reserve up to 10 percent of its allocation to support eligible charter schools for dissemination activities.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The Public Charter Schools Program supports the planning, development, and initial implementation of charter schools. Charter schools provide enhanced parental choice and are exempt from many statutory and regulatory requirements. In exchange for increased flexibility, charter schools are held accountable for improving student academic achievement. The objective is to replace rules-based governance with performance-based accountability, thereby stimulating the creativity and commitment of teachers, parents, and citizens.
States--and specifically their State educational Agencies (SEAs)-- are eligible to compete for grants if they have a charter school law in place. If an eligible SEA does not participate, charter schools from the State may apply directly to the U.S. Department of Education. Grantees receive up to 3 years of assistance, of which the charter school may use not more than 18 months for planning and program design and not more than 2 years for the initial implementation of a charter school.
In awarding grants, the Department must give preference to States that have multiple chartering agencies (or an appeals process for prospective charter schools that initially fail to be approved by a single agency), that ensure accountability of public charter schools for reaching clear and measurable objectives, and that give public charter schools a high degree of autonomy over their budgets and expenditures.
In addition, States may reserve up to 10 percent of their grant for dissemination sub-grants to spread lessons learned form high-quality charter schools with a demonstrated history of success to other public schools, including other public charter schools, about how to create and sustain high-quality, accountable schools.

Take a Deep Breath – Lily's Blackboard #education

Take a Deep Breath – Lily's Blackboard

Take a Deep Breath

Because I work for a large organization that represents 3.2 million American educators in our public schools, colleges and universities, I get to be on TV.
I got to talk to Lou Dobbs (before his views on immigration apparently became an embarrassment to his station, and they canceled his show.) I got to be theFriendless Friend on Fox & Friends. I’ve been interviewed on radio by Claudio Sanchez and Diane Rheam and the fast-talking syndicated show en español, Piolin in the Morning. I get to talk a lot about children and public education.
But I never get to know if I’ve connected.
(watch Lily at Netroots Nation with TPM)
The Netroots Nation conference of blogger-activists is over. There were no media stars signing autographs. There were no 7-second soundbite interviews where you hope against hope that there might be someone channel surfing through a

Does Race to Top Finalist Release Impact Common Core Adoptions? � The Quick and the Ed

Does Race to Top Finalist Release Impact Common Core Adoptions? � The Quick and the Ed

Does Race to Top Finalist Release Impact Common Core Adoptions?

July 27th, 2010 | Category: Uncategorized


The deadline for states applying for RTT funds to adopt common core standards and provide related supplemental information to be considered in the RTT process is Aug 2nd.
I was assuming that the Dept of Education would not release the RTT results until after that deadline. But, today the Sec released the list of 19 finalists for round II. Did the Sec. release the list of Race to the Top finalists too early? Will this end up impacting the many states who applied for RTT, but have not yet adopted the common core standards. A quick look at the states in RTT that had not yet adopted common core – Alabama, California, Iowa, Maine, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Utah, and Washington. Only one of these states – California – is