Latest News and Comment from Education

Friday, August 23, 2013

Remarks by the President and the Vice President on College Affordability | The White House

Remarks by the President and the Vice President on College Affordability | The White House:

Remarks by the President and the Vice President on College Affordability




Lackawanna College
Scranton, Pennsylvania
4:42 P.M. EDT
THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Urica, thank you very much for that introduction. 
Hello, Scranton!  (Applause.)  I tell you, it’s good to be home.  I left you a long time ago, but as a lot of my friends out here know, your heart stays here.  It never leaves.  And it’s a delight to be back.
And I just want you all to know, since so many of you have asked me about my son, things are -- it’s not only good to be here, but things are good at home in Delaware.  My son Beau is fine.  Sends his love.  (Applause.)  He wanted me to say hello to all of you, and he wanted to be with his colleague, Kathleen, the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania.  (Applause.)  But he’s doing well.  He’s anxious to get back to work.
Look, it’s great to be at Lackawanna College.  As many of you know, my wife, Jill, a Pennsylvania girl from the southeast corner of Pennsylvania, is a full-time community college professor.  And she knows what most of you know.  She has a great expression -- she says, Joe, community college is the best-kept secret in America.  And the President and I want you to know that we’re going to do everything to keep it from being a secret. 
And let me introduce you -- I know you know my town, Mr. President.  The President is right behind the curtain.  I know you know my native town, Scranton. 
But I’d like to introduce, Mr. President, because you can hear me back there, the community that formed everything I believed:  My absolute conviction that if you gave ordinary folks a fighting chance, they can and do, do extraordinary things.  (Applause.)  My absolute conviction borne out of my being raised about 20 blocks from here, my absolute conviction that the middle class is what made this country great, what built this country and what binds it together.  And my certain knowledge that people who grew up in neighborhoods like this one, the one I grew up in here in Scranton, have dreams just as big, just as expansive and just as accomplishable as anyplace in the world.  (Applause.)
As I said, Mr. President, I grew up not many blocks from here where we are today, and I can tell you there wasn’t a mom or dad in my neighborhood, Green Ridge up by Mary Wood, not a single one -- (applause) -- not a single one that believed their child couldn’t grow up to be anything they wanted to be.  Not a doubt in their mind as they struggled -- but no doubt if they were willing to work hard, we could do whatever we wanted to do. And guess what -- they were absolutely right.
You know, Mr. President, some might think this is a bit of nostalgia on my part, talking about Bobby, talking about my native town like I am.  And by the way, there’s only three women that I know who are close to perfect.  One was perfect -- the Blessed Mother.  The other was my mother, and the other is Bobby’s mom, Ellen Casey, right there.  (Applause.)
So a lot of you ask why I left Scranton when I was a kid -- I went to St. Paul’s and lived in North Washington -- why I left Scranton.  It was simple.  I lived three and a half blocks from the Caseys, and I knew that only one of us was going to be able to make it big, and it wasn’t going to be me.  (Laughter.)  So I had to get out because I knew that Casey would dominate.
But, look, it’s not just me believing this about my native town.  There’s a large new study that's been done by a group of four economists at Harvard and the University of California-Berkeley, and here’s what their study concluded -- and this is just about a month ago.  And I’m quoting from the study:  “Scranton still stands out as one of America’s cities where poor people have among the best odds of climbing to the middle class.” 
Mr. President, the American Dream is alive here in Scranton. (Applause.)  It’s alive here in Scranton.  And I think I know the reason why it’s alive.  The values that have made the middle class possible in America still matter here:  community, hard work, personal responsibility, faith, family.  But most of all, the value that is held most dear by this community, that was held most dear by my mom and dad as they were raising me here, and it’s still held dear by everyone is opportunity. 
That's the reason:  simple opportunity.  That's the value that sets America apart from the rest of the world -- opportunity.  It’s about making sure that folks have the opportunity to reach their God-given potential.  And I’m proud to say my hometown is one of those places where that dream is still working.
And that's why this is a perfect place to talk about education.  You know, Mr. President and I have a bunch of economists that work for us, and they're brilliant.  And they like to tell us that the middle class -- and they give us a number, they’ll say the middle class is $49,870 or $51,000 -- the middle class isn’t a number.  I tell them that it’s about -- it’s about understanding in your bones.  The middle class is about a value set.  It’s about being able to own your home and not just rent it.  It’s about being able to live in a safe neighborhood where your kids can walk the streets.  It’s about the dignity of a job that allows you to support your family; about being able to take care of your parents when the get older and hope your kids will never have to take care of you.  It’s about being able to send your kid to a good school where if he or she does well and qualified to get to college, you have a fighting chance to get them there.  It’s about making sure that if they get there, you can afford it.
And, Mr. President, I’ve never met a mother or father, nor have you, as we’ve campaigned all across this great nation, whether in a poor neighborhood, a middle-class neighborhood, or a wealthy neighborhood, that didn't dream -- didn't dream that their child would have access to a college education. 
And as all you folks know, that's something that's getting harder and harder to do.  And that's why the President and I are here today -- because we can't have the doors of college shut to the kids of the middle class and those aspiring to get there; because we can't let opportunity die.
There are a lot of people who tell you that you have shrink your dreams in this country now; that today’s generation of Americans and tomorrow’s are just not going to be able to aim as high as we did.  That's a bunch of malarkey.  I don't believe -- I don't believe, nor does the President believe, that for a minute.  And we never will.  That has never been the story of this nation.  And the President and I are determined to make sure that it’s never the story. 
So, ladies and gentlemen, it’s my pleasure to introduce to you, my friend, your President, Barack Obama.
THE PRESIDENT:  Hello, Lackawanna!  (Applause.)  Hello, Falcons!  Well, it is good to be back in Scranton.  (Applause.)
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  We love you!
THE PRESIDENT:  I love you back. 
First of all, everybody take a seat.  I want everybody to be comfortable.  Here’s some reasons I'm happy to be back in Scranton.  Reason number one is the first time I came to Scranton I was invited to a St. Patrick’s Day party -- (applause) -- that the ladies were hosting.  And I got to say, Michelle got a little jealous, because they were -- I was getting kisses and I came home and had all this lipstick on my collar -- (laughter) -- and Michelle said, what’s going on there?  (Laughter.)  I said, no, I was just campaigning.  (Laughter.) 
So that makes me like Scranton.  A second reason that I love Scranton is because if it weren’t for Scranton, I wouldn't have Joe Biden.  (Applause.)  And today is a special day for Joe and me because five years ago today, on August 23, 2008, I announced in Springfield, Illinois, my home state, that Joe Biden was going to be my running mate.  (Applause.)  And it was the best decision that I ever made, politically, because I love this guy.  And he’s got heart, and he cares about people and he’s willing to fight for what he believes in -- (applause) -- and he’s got some Scranton in him. 
And there’s not a day that goes by that Joe doesn’t talk about where he comes from, and he doesn’t talk about all of you. And he understands why he got into public service, because he carries with him the values that you taught him and the friendships that he made.  And so I just want all of you to know that I am lucky to have Joe -- not just as a running mate, but more importantly, as a friend.  And we love his family.  And I am so blessed to be here. And, thank you, Joe, for saying yes five years ago.  (Applause.) 
The third reason I love Scranton is because there are a lot of Caseys around here.  (Laughter.)  Now, Joe already talked about Bob Casey’s mom, who is gorgeous and wonderful, and we love her dearly.  (Applause.)  But I’ve got to admit Bob Casey is not bad either.  (Laughter.)  He is a great United States senator and I'm proud to call him a friend.  We love Teresa and we love his family.  (Applause.) 
Back in 2008, when we were campaigning in Pennsylvania and we were having a tough time and getting bad press, Bob Casey was right there with me -- on a train.  And you can judge your friends not by when you’re doing well, but when you’re having a tough time, and that’s the kind of person Bob Casey is.  And so I’m grateful for him.
We’ve got -- Mayor Chris Doherty is here.  Give him a big round of applause.  (Applause.)  The State Attorney General, Kathleen Kane, is here.  (Applause.)  The president of Lackawanna, Mark Volk, is here.  (Applause.) 
I want to say thank you to Urica Carver for the wonderful introduction to Joe.  Good job, Urica.  (Applause.)  And finally, I want to thank all of the students who are here.  (Applause.)  I know that -- looks like we’ve got the Falcons football team here. When’s your first game?
TEAM MEMBER:  31st!
THE PRESIDENT:  The 31st?  You guys going to be ready?
TEAM:  Yeah!
THE PRESIDENT:  Okay, I just want to make sure.  (Laughter.)
I know classes don’t start again until next week, so I appreciate you being inside when the day is so nice outside -- because these last few days of summer vacation I know are precious.  But we’re here to talk about something important, and that is, are we doing right by not just this generation but future generations.
I’m on a road trip.  It started at the University at Buffalo.  (Applause.)  There you go.  Then I went to Syracuse -- (applause) -- talked to some high school students there; then Binghamton University for a town hall earlier today.  Have you -- all you guys have been following me around everywhere?  (Laughter and applause.) 
And we’re ending this bus tour here in Scranton.  (Applause.)  And I wanted to visit Lackawanna College because of the great work that you’re doing here -- giving people a first-class education that doesn’t cost a fortune, with support in place to make sure that students stay on track. 
I’m told that many students here are the first in their families to attend college.  And I know your families are proud of you, but I’m proud of you, because getting a higher education is one of the best things you can do for yourself and for your country.  (Applause.)
But we've got to make sure that we're doing right by you.  That’s what I want to talk about today.  Over the past month, I’ve been visiting towns like Scranton and talking about what we need to do as a country to secure a better bargain for the middle class and everybody who is fighting to get into the middle class. We've got to have a national strategy that grows the economy in a broad-based way so that everybody who works hard has a chance to succeed.  (Applause.)  That's our goal.  That's what we're fighting for.  (Applause.)
Now, for the past four and a half years, we’ve been fighting back from a brutal recession that cost Americans their jobs and homes and savings, in some cases.  And what happened was that recession showed what had been some longer-term trends that were eroding middle-class security.  Folks at the top had been doing very well.  But ordinary Americans hadn't seen their wages go up, hadn't seen their salaries go up.  It was getting harder to save, harder to save for your kids' college education.  Health care was getting harder to obtain.  A lot of manufacturing had gone overseas. 
And so what Joe and I said was our focus is not just to fix the problems created by the crisis.  We've got to change the fundamentals so that we get back to the day when if you want to work hard, if you are willing to be responsible you can make it. You can succeed.  (Applause.)
So we saved an auto industry.  We took on a broken health care system.  We invested in new technologies to achieve energy independence.  We changed our tax code that was tilted too much in favor of folks who were doing very well at the expense of working families.  We started to crack down on some of the practices we had seen in the financial sector that got us into this mess into the first place. 
And because of that work, our businesses today have created 7.3 million new jobs over the last 41 months.  (Applause.)  We're generating more energy than ever before.  We sell more goods made in America to other countries than ever before.  (Applause.)  Manufacturing is starting to come back and in-shore instead of outsource.  Health care costs are growing at the slowest rate in 50 years.  Our deficits are falling at the fastest rate in 60 years.  (Applause.)  
So thanks to the grit and resilience and hard work of the American people -- and some good policies -- we’ve been able to clear away the rubble of the financial crisis.  We're laying the foundation for an economy that works for everybody.  But as I'll bet a lot of families in Scranton will tell you, we're not yet where we need to be.  We've got a lot more work to do.
Like I said, even before the crisis hit, we were living through a decade where almost all the productivity gains, all the benefits of technology were accruing at the very top.  And the average family had seen their incomes and wages flat or actually go down a little bit.  Most families were working harder and harder just to get by.  Costs of everything else were going up, but your wages and your incomes weren't going up. 
So reversing that trend, returning to the days when if you're willing to work hard you can succeed, that should be Washington's highest priority.  (Applause.)  That should be Washington's highest priority.  That's Joe's highest priority.  That's Bob Casey's highest priority.  That's my highest priority. That's what we should be focused on every single day.  (Applause.)
But we do have a problem, which is we've got some of our friends down in Washington who -- and it's not all Republicans, but there's a strong faction -- (laughter) -- who instead of focusing on what's helping middle-class families succeed, they're spending time arguing about whether or not we should be paying the bills for things we already spent money on.  They're threatening to shut down the government and have another financial crisis unless, for example, we get rid of the health care reform that we fought to pass and that’s going to provide millions of people health care security for the first time. 
That won't create jobs.  That’s not going to help our economy.  That doesn’t strengthen the middle class.  (Applause.) I have not seen a policy coming out of them that would actually help ordinary folks.  And we can't afford the usual Washington circus of distractions and political posturing and special interests and phony scandals.  We can't afford that.  We've got too much work to do. 
We've got to build on the cornerstones of what it means to be middle class in America:  A good job with good wages; a good education; a home of your own; affordable health care; secure retirements even if you’re not rich; more ladders of opportunity for everybody who's willing to work for.  That’s what we should be fighting for.  (Applause.)  
And one of the most important things we can do to restore that sense of upward mobility -- the ability to achieve the American Dream, the idea that you can make it if you try -- one of the most important things we can do is make sure every child is getting a good education.  (Applause.) 
And the students who are studying here, they understand that.  That’s why they've made sacrifices.  That’s why their family are making sacrifices.  You understand that in the face of global competition -- when the Germans and the Chinese and the Indians are all putting more money into education and putting more money into research -- that we can't just stand pat.  We can't stand by and do nothing.  You understand that a great education is more important than ever. 
And you don’t have to take my word for it.  Look, the data is clear:  If you get some kind of higher education -- whether it’s a 2-year degree, a 4-year degree, a technical college -- you’re more likely to have a job.  You're more likely to see your income going up.  More than ever before, some form of higher education is the surest path into the middle class, and the surest path that you stay there.  (Applause.) 
Now, here's the challenge:  The soaring cost of higher education has become an increasing burden and barrier for too many young people.  College has never been more necessary, but it's never been more expensive. 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  I'm with you!
THE PRESIDENT:  It's true.  (Laughter.) 
Over the past -- listen to this statistic, because this is important.  Over the past three decades, past 30 years, the average tuition at a public 4-year college has risen by more than 250 percent.  So it didn’t just double.  It went up 250 percent. The typical family income has only gone up 16 percent.  So you do the math.  I’m not a math major, but there are probably some good math people here.  If you’ve got the cost of college going up like this and incomes going up like that, you start getting that bigger and bigger gap, and that means it’s harder and harder for young people to afford college.
And, meanwhile, states have been cutting back on their higher education budgets.  And let’s face it, here in Pennsylvania there have been brutal cuts to not just higher education, but education, generally.  (Applause.)  Not enough colleges have been able to cut back on their costs.  So what happens if costs are going up, incomes are flat, and the state actually reduces its support for higher education?  Well, what you end up with is students have to pick up the tab, families have to pick up the tab, and taxpayers have to pick up the tab in the form of more and more financial assistance. 
And that’s happened.  The average student who borrows for college now graduates owing more than $26,000, but a lot of folks will owe a lot more than that.  I get letters from people who have $100,000 worth of debt; young people who’ve got $120,000 worth of debt.  And they may be working as teachers.  They may be doing really important work.  They may be working as researchers. But they can’t pay off that kind of debt.  (Applause.) 
So what’s ending up happening is students end up facing a choice that they should never have to make.  Either they say no to college, which means that they’re going to be paying the price the rest of their lifetimes for not getting a degree -- or they go to college, but they’re taking on so much debt that they’re not sure they’re ever going to be able to pay it back. 
And if you come out with huge debt, what does that mean?  It means you can’t get a mortgage on a house right away because you’re paying off your debt.  You may put off starting a family because you’re worried about paying off the debt.  If you’ve got a good idea for starting a business, you’re maybe going to put that off because you’re still servicing your debt.  And that’s bad for the entire economy.  That’s bad for everybody.
That’s a choice we should not accept.  That’s not who we are.  Keep in mind, this is a country that gave my grandfather, when he came back from World War II, the chance to go to college for free on the GI Bill.  (Applause.)  My mother was able to go to a public university and get the support she needed so she could go to school even though she was raising two kids and had to work part time to do it.  (Applause.) 
Michelle and I, we're only where we are today because scholarships and student loans gave us a shot at a great education. And, by the way, we did have to borrow a lot of money.  I didn’t pay off all of my student loans until right before I was elected to the U.S. Senate.  I was in my 40s.  I was supposed to be saving for Malia and Sasha -- I was still paying off my loans.  (Laughter.)  So I know a little bit about this.  
The point is, though, in the past, we've done what was required to support the next generation succeeding, because we understood if they succeed then we'll all succeed.  But we've kind of lost track of that.  So when Joe and I came in, with the help of Bob Casey and others, we took some steps to help make student loans more affordable.  We changed the system where student loans were going through banks, and banks were making billions of dollars; we said let's just give the loans directly to students, save billions of dollars so we can give more help to more students.  That’s what we did.  (Applause.) 
We set up a consumer watchdog to help students and their families navigate through the financial options, make sure that they don’t get taken by shady lenders.  And we gave more tools and resources to students and families to finance college.  And, by the way, young people, if you're still trying to figure out how to finance it, go to studentaid.gov, and it will give you information that you need. 
And then we took action to cap loan repayments at 10 percent of monthly incomes for a lot of borrowers who were going into public service so that they could responsibly manage their debt. And overall, these things made college more affordable, more accessible for millions of students and families.  Using tax credits and grants and student loans, all of this helped.  And then, just a few weeks ago, working with Bob Casey and others, we worked to make sure that student loan rates didn’t double.  And that saves the typical undergraduate more than $1,500 for this year's loans.  (Applause.) 
So we've made some progress.  But it's not enough.  The system is on a trajectory that is unsustainable, because if you keep on seeing the cost of college tuition go up and up and up, then no matter how much money we put in for loans or grants or what have you, it's not going to keep up.  And it means students are going to be even deeper in debt. 
What we have to do is to actually reduce the cost.  (Applause.)  And that means that state legislatures cannot just keep cutting support for public college and universities.  (Applause.)  They've got to prioritize the next generation.  (Applause.)  It means colleges have to work harder to prevent tuition from going up year after year. 
Our economy cannot afford the trillion dollars in outstanding student loan debt.  We can't price the middle class and everybody working to get into the middle class out of a college education.  We're going to have to change how we do business.  Higher education is not a luxury -- it's an economic necessity.  And every American should be able to afford it.  (Applause.)  
So yesterday, I announced some new reforms to shake up the system.  Some will require action from Congress.  (Laughter.)  That will -- that’s always challenging.  But these are ideas that should have bipartisan support.  Of course, so should Obamacare. (Applause.)  It's actually a really good idea.  It's going to work.  (Applause.)  It used to be a Republican idea.  (Laughter.) There was a governor in Massachusetts who set it up -- it's working really well.  (Laughter.) 
But some of the reforms we're proposing we can make on our own.  We're going to work with colleges to keep costs down.  We're going to work with states to make higher education a bigger priority in the budget.  And, by the way, students, we’re going to also ask a little more from you, too, when it comes to you receiving financial aid because you’re going to have responsibilities as well. 
And these reforms won’t be popular with all the institutions out there because some of them are doing okay with the status quo.  Even if their students aren’t graduating, they're still getting the money.  But I’m not concerned with the institutions. I’m concerned with the students.  I want the students to get a good deal.  (Applause.)  The institutions are there to serve the students and educate the young people.
So my plan comes down to three main goals.  Number one, I’m directing my administration to come up with a new, more useful rating system for colleges.  What we’re going to do is not just measure -- right now a lot of these rating systems are based on how selective the school is, how expensive the school is, how nice the dorm rooms are.  What I want is for us to measure the kind of value they're giving students and their families, and are they providing the opportunity that we should be providing.  Are they helping students from all kinds of backgrounds succeed?  Are they graduating students at a good rate?  Are students graduating with manageable debt?  Do they have strong career potential?  Are students getting jobs after they graduate from these places?  That's what we want to focus on.  (Applause.)
So that's information that's useful.  That's news you can use.  It will help students and parents figure out how much value a college truly offers. 
And then down the road, using these ratings, we’re going to work with Congress to change how we allocate federal aid for college.  Because I said this last year, and I meant it, colleges that keep their tuition down while providing a high-quality education, we want to see their taxpayer support go up.  We should not be subsidizing schools that are not getting good results for the young people who attend them.  (Applause.)  We’ve got to do more to reward schools that deliver for students and our future.  So that's number one.
Number two, we’re going to encourage more colleges to innovate, try new things, do things that can provide a great education without breaking the bank.  So, for example, a number of colleges across the country are using online education to save time and money for their students.  Or they may be, for example, seeing if you can get credits faster.  If you can show competency, if you know your subject matter, you shouldn’t -- it shouldn’t matter how many hours in a classroom you work.  The question is do you know the subject.  And if you can accelerate it, you should be able to save money doing it.  (Applause.)
Some schools are trying what you’re doing here in Scranton, and that's creating partnerships between high schools and colleges so students in high school can start accruing some credits.  They can get a jump on their degree.  That saves them money.  (Applause.)
So the bottom line is I want to see schools and states get in the game, try new things, figure out how to maintain high quality while reducing costs.  And we’ll provide incentives to states to do that.
And then the third thing, even if we control costs, some of you are still going to have debt once you graduate.  That's okay. I had debt.  Joe had debt.  Not all of us have parents who, no matter how much they love us and work hard, can afford to pay for all of our college.  But the question is can you manage it and afford it responsibly.  People don't want to take out debt, but they're making a good investment.  Education is something that will pay off in time, but it's got to be managed.  I don't want debt to keep you from getting the job that you want, or getting married, or buying your first home. 
So that's why we already capped repayments at 10 percent of a student income after college for a lot of students.  We call it “pay as you earn.”  (Applause.)  So far it's helping about 2.5 million students.  But there are a lot of students, both current and former students, who aren't eligible.  So we want to work with Congress to fix that and make more students eligible for it. 
And too many students don't know that the program exists.  So we're going to launch a campaign to help borrowers learn more about their options.  Because we should allow every student the chance to pay back their loans in a way that doesn’t stop them from becoming a teacher or becoming a nurse who is working in a needy community.  You may have great skills.  You may choose a profession that doesn't pay a lot of money -- you should be able to do that.  And if you're giving back to the community, we should help you do it. (Applause.) 
So if we do these three things -- increase value, encourage innovation, help people manage their debt after graduation -- then we'll help more students afford college.  We’ll help more students graduate from college.  We’ll help more students keep their debt low and repay it faster.  We can do that. 
AUDIENCE MEMBER:  (Inaudible.)
THE PRESIDENT:  Well, there you go.  (Laughter.) 
Now, this is going to take a lot of work.  But the people of Scranton I think know something about hard work.  The American people know something about hard work.  So just because something is hard doesn't mean that we don't do it.  (Applause.) We can get this done.  We can get college more affordable.  We can have the best-trained workforce in the world if we keep on moving forward.  And Joe and I are going to keep pushing for a better bargain for the middle class, a better bargain for the next generation.  And, Scranton, we're going to need your help to get it done. 
God bless you.  God bless the United States of America. 

END              5:21 P.M. EDT

NYC Educator: The Campbell Brown Show

NYC Educator: The Campbell Brown Show:

The Campbell Brown Show

Some people simply call this place earth, but for legal expert Campbell Brown, it's a forum for her to shock us with her spectacular and lurid accusations. There are 128 teachers who were accused of some sort of sexual offense. Why can't Walcott fire them? The short answer, of course, is that arbitrators, chosen jointly by UFT and DOE, found them not guilty.

But for legal expert Campbell Brown, who's married to some Students First bigshot, which surely has absolutely nothing to do with her crusade, that answer is just not good enough. So she made it a point to confront UFT President Michael Mulgrew about it. You can see the video here.

Gotham Schools had originally written it was about "teachers who have sexually harassed students," but to their credit, they changed it after I complained. The fact is, not all these cases were about that, and I know of only one. In this case no such thing happened. However, Campbell Brown did not like it when I objected.





You see how this goes, don't you? You can only answer two ways. Yes, I think it's harrassment, and I'm therefore 

SBE Agenda for September 2013 - State Board of Education (CA Dept of Education)

SBE Agenda for September 2013 - State Board of Education (CA Dept of Education):

SBE Agenda for September 2013

Agenda for the California State Board of Education (SBE) meeting on September 4, 2013.





State Board Members
  • Michael W. Kirst, President
  • Ilene W. Straus, Vice President
  • Sue Burr
  • Carl Cohn
  • Bruce Holaday
  • Aida Molina
  • Patricia A. Rucker
  • Niki Sandoval
  • Trish Williams
  • Jesse Zhang, Student Member
  • Vacancy
Secretary & Executive Officer
  • Hon. Tom Torlakson
Executive Director
  • Karen Stapf Walters
Schedule of Meeting
Location
Wednesday, September 4, 2013 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time ±
STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
Public Session, adjourn to Closed Session. The Closed Session will take place at approximately 11:30 a.m.  (The public may not attend.)
California Department of Education
1430 N Street, Room 1101
Sacramento, California 95814
916-319-0827
The Closed Session (1) may commence earlier than 11:30 a.m.; (2) may begin at or before 11:30 a.m., be recessed, and then be reconvened later in the day; or (3) may commence later than 11:30 a.m.
Please see the detailed agenda for more information about the items to be considered and acted upon. The public is welcome.

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA

Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation: Under Government Code sections 11126(e)(1) and (e)(2)(A), the State Board of Education hereby provides public notice that some or all of the pending litigation follows will be considered and acted upon in closed session:
  • Alejo, et al. v. Jack O’Connell, State Board of Education, et al., San Francisco County Superior Court, Case No. CPF-09-509568, CA Ct. of Appeal, 1st Dist., Case No. A130721
  • California School Boards Association, et al. v. California State Board of Education and Aspire Public Schools, Inc.,Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. 07353566, CA Ct. of Appeal, 1st Dist., Case No. A122485, CA Supreme Court, Case No. S186129
  • California School Boards Association and its Education Legal Alliance, et al. v. The California State Board of Education, et al., Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2008-00021188-CU-MC-GDS, CA Ct. of Appeal, 3rd Dist., Case No. No. C060957
  • D.J. et al. v. State of California, California Department of Education, Tom Torlakson, the State Board of Education, Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BS142775.  
  • Emma C.et al. v. Delaine Eastin, et al., USDC (No.Dist.CA), Case No. C-96-4179
  • EMS-BP, LLC, Options for Youth Burbank, Inc., et al. v. California Department of Education, et al., Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 03CS01078 and 03CS01079 and related appeal
  • Graham et al. v the State Board of Education, the California Department of Education, Jack O’Connell, Fred Balcom, Tom Torlakson, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC482694, 2nd Dist., Case No. B245288
  • K.C. et al. v. Jack O’Connell, et al., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. C054077 MMC
  • Opportunity for Learning – PB, LLC; Opportunities Learning – C, LLC, and Opportunities for Learning WSH, LLC, Notice of Appeal Before the Audit Appeals Panel
  • Options for Youth, Burbank, Inc., San Gabriel, Inc. Upland, Inc. and Victor Valley, Notice of Appeal Before the Education Audit Appeals Panel, OAH Case No. 2006100966
  • Options for Youth-Victor Valley, et al. v. California Department of Education, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC347454
  • Perris Union High School District v. California State Board of Education, California Department of Education, et al., Riverside County Superior Court, Case No. RIC520862, CA Ct. of Appeal, 4th District, Case No. E055856
  • Porter, et al., v. Manhattan Beach Unified School District, et al., United States District Court, Central District, Case No. CV-00-08402
  • Reed v. State of California, Los Angeles Unified School District, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, Jack O’Connell, California Department of Education, and State Board of Education, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC432420, CA Ct. of Appeal, 2nd Dist., Case No. B230817, CA Supreme Ct., Case No. 5191256
  • Shabazz, et al. v. Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr., California Attorney General Kamala Harris, Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, President California State Board of Education Dr. Michael Kirst, Does 1-50, Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG12636192
  • Stoner Park Community Advocates v. City of Los Angeles, Department of Planning of the City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation City of Los Angeles, New West Charter Middle School, and State Board of Education, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BS138051
  • Today’s Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of Education, et al., Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BS112656, CA Ct. of Appeal, 2nd Dist., Case Nos. B212966 and B214470
  • Vergara et al. v. State of California, Governor Edmund G. Brown, Tom Torlakson, the California Department of Education, the State Board of Education, Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC484642
Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation:  Under Government Code sections 11126(e), the State Board of Education hereby provides public notice that it may meet in Closed Session to decide whether there is a significant exposure to litigation, and to consider and act in connection with matters for which there is a significant exposure to litigation.  UnderGovernment Code sections 11126(e)(1) and (e)(2), the State Board of Education hereby provides public notice that it may meet in Closed Session to decide to initiate litigation and to consider and act in connection with litigation it has decided to initiate.
Under Government Code Section 11126(c)(14), the State Board of Education hereby provides public notice that it may meet in Closed Session to review and discuss the actual content of pupil achievement tests (including, but not limited to, the High School Exit Exam) that have been submitted for State Board approval and/or approved by the State Board.
Under Government Code Section 11126(a), the State Board of Education hereby provides public notice that it may meet in Closed Session regarding the appointment, employment, evaluation of performance, or dismissal, discipline, or release of public employees, or a complaint or charge against public employees. Public employees include persons exempt from civil service under Article VII, Section 4(e) of the California Constitution.
ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE PROVIDED
FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY
ALL ITEMS MAY BE RE-ORDERED TO BE HEARD ON
ANY DAY OF THE NOTICED MEETING
THE ORDER OF BUSINESS MAY BE CHANGED WITHOUT NOTICE
Time is set aside for individuals desiring to speak on any topic not otherwise on the agenda (please see the detailed agenda for the Public Session). In all cases, the presiding officer reserves the right to impose time limits on presentations as may be necessary to ensure that the agenda is completed.
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY
Pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, any individual with a disability who requires reasonable accommodation to attend or participate in a meeting or function of the California State Board of Education (SBE), may request assistance by contacting the SBE Office, 1430 N Street, Room 5111, Sacramento, CA, 95814; telephone, 916-319-0827; facsimile, 916‑319-0175.

CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

FULL BOARD AGENDA
Public Session

September 4, 2013
Wednesday, September 4, 2013 – 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time ±
California Department of Education
1430 N Street, Room 1101
Sacramento, California 95814
  • Call to Order
  • Salute to the Flag
  • Communications
  • Announcements
  • Report of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction
  • Special Presentations 
    Public notice is hereby given that special presentations for informational purposes may take place during this session.
  • Agenda Items
  • Adjournment

AGENDA ITEMS

Item 1 (DOC)
Subject: Update on the Activities of the California Department of Education and State Board of Education Regarding Implementation of Common Core State Standards Systems.
Type of Action: Information

Item 2 (DOC)
Subject:  Mathematics Framework for California Public Schools: Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve, 2013 Revision: Update on the revision of the framework.
Type of Action:  Information

Item 3 (DOC)
Subject: Update on Statewide Assessment Transition and Smarter Balanced Assessment Development Activities.
Type of Action: Information

Item 4 (DOC)
Subject:  Federal Waiver Request Submittal for Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, to Eliminate "Double-testing" During the Transition to New Assessments Aligned with College- and Career-ready Standards for the 2013–14 School Year Only.
Type of Action:  Action, Information 

Item 5 (DOC)
Subject:  Assessment, Development and Administration Update, Including, but not Limited to, the 2012–13 Standardized Testing and Reporting Results, California High School Exit Examination Results, and the Accountability Progress Reporting System Release.
Type of Action:  Information

Item 6 (DOC)
Subject:  Local Control Funding Formula: Discussion of Proposed Changes to California’s Local Educational Agency and School Planning and Accountability System.
Type of Action: Action, Information

Item 7 (DOC)
Subject: Recommendation of a Method to Emphasize Student Mastery of Standards in Science and Social Science Through the Public School Accountability System or by Other Means as Required by Education Code Section 52052.9.
Type of Action: Action, Information

Item 8 (DOC)
Subject:  Proposals for Alternative Methods to the Decile Ranks as Required by Education Code Section 52052.9.
Type of Action: Action, Information

Item 9 (DOC)
Subject:  Update on the English Language Development Standards Implementation Plan.
Type of Action:  Action, Information

Item 10 (DOC)
Subject:  Adoption of Next Generation Science Standards for California Public Schools, Kindergarten through Grade Twelve as the new Science Content Standards based upon the nationally developed Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) as required by Education Code 60605.85. Included in the recommendation for adoption are the NGSS Appendices A through M.
Type of Action:  Action, Information

WAIVERS

WAIVERS / ACTION AND CONSENT ITEMS
The following agenda items include waivers that are proposed for consent and those waivers scheduled for separate action because CDE staff has identified possible opposition, recommended denial, or determined may present new or unusual issues that should be considered by the State Board. Waivers proposed for consent are so indicated on each waiver’s agenda item; however, any board member may remove a waiver from proposed consent and the item may be heard individually. On a case-by-case basis, public testimony may be considered regarding the item, subject to the limits set by the Board President or by the President's designee; and action different from that recommended by CDE staff may be taken.
Federal Program Waiver (Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act)
Item W-01 (DOC)
Subject: Request by four districts for a waiver of Section 131(c)(1) of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-270).
Waiver Numbers:
  • Bret Harte Union High School District Fed-03-2013
  • Escalon Unified School District Fed-01-2013
  • Muroc Joint Unified School District Fed-04-2013
  • Pierce Joint Unified School District Fed-02-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL)

Schoolsite Council Statute (Number and Composition of Members)
Item W-02 (DOC)
Subject: Request by thirteen local educational agencies, under the authority of California Education Code Section 52863 for waivers of Education Code Section 52852, relating to schoolsite councils regarding changes in shared, composition, or shared and composition members.
Waiver Numbers:
  • Big Pine Unified School District 8-5-2013
  • Charter Oak Unified School District 12-5-2013
  • Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School District 7-5-2013
  • Glenn County Office of Education 11-5-2013
  • Gold Oak Union Elementary School District 29-6-2013
  • Golden Valley Unified School District 8-6-2013
  • Kernville Union Elementary School District 26-6-2013
  • Madera County Office of Education 17-5-2013
  • Marin County Office of Education 24-5-2013
  • Placer Union High School District 12-6-2013
  • Plumas County Office of Education 10-6-2013
  • Rio Elementary School District 16-6-2013
  • Woodland Joint Unified School District 26-5-2013
  • Woodland Joint Unified School District 27-5-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS)

Special Education Program (Educational Interpreter for Deaf and Hard of Hearing)
Item W-03 (DOC)
Subject: Request by three local educational agencies to waive California Code of Regulations, Title 5, Section 3051.16(b)(3), the requirement that educational interpreters for deaf and hard of hearing pupils meet minimum qualifications as of July 1, 2009, to allow three educational interpreters to continue to provide services to students until June 30, 2014, under a remediation plan to complete those minimum qualifications.
Waiver Numbers:
  • Clovis Unified School District 4-5-2013
  • Hemet Unified School District 2-5-2013
  • Shasta County Office of Education 13-5-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS)

Special Education Program (Resource Teacher Caseload)
Item W-04 (DOC)
Subject: Request by two local educational agencies, under the authority of California Education Code Section 56101 andCalifornia Code of Regulations, Title 5, Section 3100, to waive Education Code Section 56362(c). Approval of this waiver will allow the resource specialists at both agencies to exceed the maximum caseload of 28 students by no more than four students (32 maximum).
Waiver Numbers:
  • Pioneer Union Elementary School District 3-6-2013
  • Placer Union High School District 38-4-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS)

State Testing Apportionment Report (STAR)
Item W-05 (DOC)
Subject: Request by two local educational agencies to waive the State Testing Apportionment Information Report deadline of December 31 in the California Code of Regulations, Title 5, Section 11517.5(b)(1)(A), regarding the California English Language Development Test; or Title5, Section 1225(b)(2)(A), regarding the California High School Exit Examination; or Title 5, Section 862(c)(2)(A), regarding the Standardized Testing and Reporting Program.
Waiver Numbers:
  • Anderson Valley Unified School District 18-5-2013 
  • Orange Unified School District 9-5-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL)

Community Day Schools (CDS) (Colocate Facilities)
Item W-06 (DOC)
Subject: Request by two local educational agencies under the authority of California Education Code Section 33050, to waive portions of California Education Code Section 48661(a), relating to the colocation of a community day school with other types of schools and/or portions of California Education Code sections 48660 and 48916.1(d), relating to the allowable grade spans for community day schools.
Waiver Numbers:
  • Chaffey Joint Union High School District 4-6-2013
  • Sierra Unified School District 10-5-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS)

Equity Length of Time (Equity Length of Time)
Item W-07 (DOC)
Subject: Request by Forestville Union Elementary School District to waive California Education Code Section 37202, the equity length of time requirement for transitional kindergartern and kindergarten programs at Forestville Union Elementary School.
Waiver Number: 28-5-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS)

Out-of-State Use of Funds and Transportation Allowances
Item W-08 (DOC)
Subject: Request by Dunsmuir Joint Union High School District to waive a portion of California Education Code Section 35330(b)(3) to authorize expenditure of school district funds for students to travel to Oregon and Nevada to attend economically prudent curricular and extracurricular trips/events and competitions.
Waiver Number: 6-6-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL)

School Construction Bonds (Bond Indebtedness Limit - Non-Unified after 2000)
Item W-09 (DOC)
Subject: Request by Weaver Union School District to waive California Education Code sections 15102 and portions of 15268 related to bonded indebtedness limits. Total bonded indebtedness may not exceed 1.25 percent of the taxable assessed valuation of property for elementary school districts. Depending on the type of bond, a tax rate levy limit of $30 per $100,000 of assessed value for elementary school districts may also apply.
Waiver Number: 23-5-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS)

School District Reorganization (Elimination of Election Requirement)
Item W-10 (DOC)
Subject: Request by Bonsall Union Elementary School District to waive California Education Code Section 35103, that requires the election for the initial governing board of a newly formed school district to be held in March.
Waiver Number: 15-5-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL)

School District Reorganization (Elimination of Election Requirement)
Item W-11 (DOC)
Subject: Request by Lodi Unified School District to waive California Education Code Section 5020, and portions of sections 5019, 5021, and 5030, that require a district-wide election to establish new trustee areas.
Waiver Number: 21-6-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL)

Special Education Program (Algebra I Requirement for Graduation)
Item W-12 (DOC)
Subject: Request by Natomas Unified School District to waive California Education Code Section 51224.5(b), the requirement that all students graduating in the 2012–13 school year be required to complete a course in Algebra I (or equivalent) to be given a diploma of graduation, for five special education students based on Education Code Section 56101, the special education waiver authority.
Waiver Number: 20-6-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL)

Class Size Penalties (Over Limit on Grades 1-3)
Item W-13 (DOC)
Subject: Request by 12 districts, under the authority of California Education Code Section 41382, to waive portions ofEducation Code sections 41376(a), (c), and (d) and/or 41378(a) through (e), relating to class size penalties for kindergarten through grade three. For kindergarten, the overall class size average is 31 to one with no class larger than 33. For grades one through three, the overall class size average is 30 to one with no class larger than 32.
Waiver Numbers:
  • Adelanto Elementary School District 108-12-2012
  • Atascadero Unified School District 5-5-2013
  • Cottonwood Union Elementary School District 19-5-2013
  • Cottonwood Union Elementary School District 21-5-2013
  • El Monte City Elementary School District 18-6-2013
  • Fruitvale Elementary School District 14-5-2013
  • Gold Oak Union Elementary School District 16-5-2013
  • Greenfield Union Elementary School District 27-6-2013
  • Jamul-Dulzura Union Elementary School District 15-6-2013
  • New Haven Unified School District 5-6-2013
  • Sacramento City Unified School District 7-6-2013
  • Stanislaus Union Elementary School District 19-6-2013
  • Vacaville Unified School District 17-6-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS)

Class Size Penalties (Over Limit on Grades 4-8)
Item W-14 (DOC)
Subject: Request by two districts to waive portions of California Education Code Section 41376(b) and (e), relating to class size penalties for grades four through eight. A district’s current class size maximum is the greater of the 1964 statewide average of 29.9 to one or the district’s 1964 average.
Waiver Numbers:
  • Dos Palos Oro Loma Joint Unified School District 29-5-2013
  • Jamul-Dulzura Union Elementary School District 14-6-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS)

Quality Education Investment Act (Class Size Reduction Requirements)
Item W-15 (DOC)
Subject: Request by three local educational agencies to waive portions of California Education Code Section 52055.740(a), regarding class size reduction requirements under the Quality Education Investment Act.
Waiver Numbers:
  • Baldwin Park Unified School District 22-6-2013
  • Paramount Unified School District 13-6-2013
  • Pond Union Elementary School District 2-6-2013
(Recommended for APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS)
END OF WAIVERS

Item 11 (DOC)
Subject: Subject: STATE BOARD PROJECTS AND PRIORITIES.
Including, but not limited to, future meeting plans; agenda items; and officer nominations and/or elections; State Board office budget, staffing, appointments, and direction to staff; declaratory and commendatory resolutions; bylaw review and revision; Board policy; approval of minutes; Board liaison reports; training of Board members; and other matters of interest. 
Type of Action:  Action, Information

Item 12 (DOC)
Subject: Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT. 
Public Comment is invited on any matter not included on the printed agenda. Depending on the number of individuals wishing to address the State Board, the presiding officer may establish specific time limits on presentations.
Type of Action:  Information

Item 13 (DOC)
Subject:  Approval of the Charter School Number Assigned to Newly Established Charter Schools.
Type of Action:  Action, Information

Item 14 (DOC)
Subject: Elementary and Secondary Education Act: Approval of Local Educational Agency Plans, Title I, Section 1112.
Type of Action:  Action, Information

Item 15 (DOC)
Subject: Elementary and Secondary Education Act: Supplemental Educational Services Providers: Approval of Additional Providers to the 2013–15 State Board of Education-Approved Supplemental Educational Services Provider List and Denial of an Applicant Based on Appeal.
Type of Action:  Action, Information

Item 16 (DOC)
Subject: Update on Issues Related to California’s Implementation of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and Other Federal Programs: Fiscal Year 2012 School Improvement Grant Cohort 2 Fiscal Year 2012 Grant Award Notification; Title III Response to the Final Report Issued by the Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office.
Type of Action:  Action, Information

Item 17 (DOC)
Subject: Approve Changes to the State of California Consolidated State Application Workbook related to the Title III Accountability System in order to Comply with the Federal Title III Accountability Requirements.
Type of Action:  Action, Information

Item 18 (DOC; 1MB)
Subject:  Civic Center Act: Approve Commencement of the Rulemaking Process for Amendments to the California Code of Regulations, Title 5, sections 14037-14042.
Type of Action:  Action, Information

Item 19 (DOC)
Subject:  Pupil Fees and Discrimination Complaints: Adopt Proposed California Code of Regulations, Title 5, sections 4600-4650.
Type of Action: Action, Information

Item 20 (DOC; 2MB)
Subject: Approval of 2013–14 Consolidated Applications.
Type of Action:  Action, Information
ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING

This agenda is posted on the State Board of Education’s Web site. For more information concerning this agenda, please contact the State Board of Education at 1430 N Street, Room 5111, Sacramento, CA, 95814; telephone 916-319-0827; facsimile 916-319-0175. Members of the public wishing to send written comments about an agenda item to the board are encouraged to send an electronic copy to SBE@cde.ca.gov, with the item number clearly marked in the subject line. In order to ensure that comments are received by board members in advance of the meeting, materials must be received by 12:00 p.m. on the Monday before the meeting.
Questions: State Board of Education | 916-319-0827 

4LAKids - LAUSD CHARGED WITH VIOLATING UNION CONTRACT IN TEACHER EVALUATION + smf’s 2¢

4LAKids - some of the news that doesn't fit: LAUSD CHARGED WITH VIOLATING UNION CONTRACT IN TEACHER EVALUATION + smf’s 2¢:

LAUSD CHARGED WITH VIOLATING UNION CONTRACT IN TEACHER EVALUATION + smf’s 2¢



BY BARBARA JONES, LOS ANGELES DAILY NEWS  | HTTP://BIT.LY/13XKEAL

8/22/13, 9:05 PM PDT  ::  Los Angeles Unified’s teachers union has filed an unfair labor practice charge against the school district, saying administrators failed to negotiate key changes to a controversial performance evaluation system now being used to review educators.
Warren Fletcher, president of United Teachers Los Angeles, said Thursday that the complaint was filed in June with the state Public Employment Relations Board after the school district “unilaterally” imposed revisions in an evaluation developed under court order.
The complaint came to light this week as part of a “toolkit” posted on the UTLA website, advising teachers how to respond when they come up for review. It includes a letter that teachers can give their principals, asserting their collective bargaining rights.
“It has consistently been the position of UTLA that applying cookie-cutter rules and procedures to the teacher evaluation process is counterproductive for both teachers and administrators,” the letter says. “It is unfortunate that central Beaudry management is attempting to unilaterally implement these changes in the evaluation process. We all share the goal of an evaluation system where the work and judgment of professional educators in honored.”
Los Angeles Unified filed a nine-page response with PERB on Aug. 15, refuting each of UTLA’s allegations and asking that the complaint be dismissed.
The teacher evaluation stems from a lawsuit filed in 2011 against the school district and Superintendent John Deasy, claiming Los 

California Educators, Events to Honor 50th Anniversary of March on Washington - California Teachers Association

California Educators, Events to Honor 50th Anniversary of March on Washington - California Teachers Association:

California Educators, Events to Honor 50th Anniversary of March on Washington

NOTE TO MEDIA ON INTERVIEWS: To arrange interviews with a few Bay Area teachers who were at the historic march in 1963, contact Mike Myslinski at CTA at 408-921-5769.



BURLINGAME – California educators, labor and civil rights groups are joining in the national remembrance of the historic March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom in 1963 that helped accelerate victories won by the civil rights movement in that decade of defiance and deliverance. In front of more than 200,000 people, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. gave his “I Have a Dream” speech at the Lincoln Memorial to conclude that historic day 50 years ago.

While several days of commemorative events are planned in Washington, CTA is honoring these watershed events by partnering with the Oakland-based Equal Justice Society to promote free lesson plans for educators about milestones in civil rights. A Los Angeles re-enactment of the March on Washington Saturday, Aug. 24, is co-sponsored by the local labor movement, while a second commemorative event is scheduled for Oakland.

The recent actions by the U.S. Supreme Court to weaken the Voting Rights Act of 1965 make it clear that the struggle is far from over, said Dean E. Vogel, president of the 325,000-member California Teachers Association.

“This is a time of reflection on how much has been gained and how much work still needs to be done,” Vogel said. “CTA joins the entire labor family and all California families in honoring the meaning of that historic march and its legacy for all of us. Our union’s 150 years of advocacy for students has often meant fighting for justice, fairness and the respect that all people deserve.”

                                     California Teacher Recalls Southern Segregation
Oakland Unified School District teacher Rosenda Thomas will be attending a special Aug. 28 Equal Justice Society theater event honoring civil rights pioneers and the march itself of Aug. 28, 1963. She grew up in the civil rights movement. She is past chair of the CTA Black Caucus, and current national vice chair of the National Education Association’s Black Caucus.

As a little girl in the 1960s, Thomas was living in Berkeley and attending an integrated public school. She recalls the jarring visit to see an aunt in segregated Louisiana when she went to drink from a public water fountain.

“I was told I couldn’t drink from that fountain, that I had to drink from the one that was for colored people. I thought that meant the water was colored. I just felt like something wasn’t right. I didn’t understand that whole concept that black people couldn’t go certain places. That experience stayed with me all of my life.”

Now a veteran, 30-year teacher, she has a poster of Dr. King giving his speech at the March on Washington displayed in her second-grade classroom at Fruitvale Elementary in Oakland. She got to meet his son, Martin Luther King III, at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting in Washington last year. “It was a magical moment. I thanked him for having such a great father. He had an impact not just on the United States, but on the whole world.”

Thomas is a member of the Oakland Education Association, which is helping to promote another commemorative event about the march to be held from 1-2:30 p.m. Saturday, Aug. 24, at Mosswood Park, 3612 Webster St., Oakland. It’s sponsored by the Bay Area Black Worker Center, an affiliate of the National Black Worker Center Project.

Fifty summers ago, the scale of the simmering battle for civil rights exploded almost overnight from its frontlines in the defiantly segregated South to the national stage with the historic March on Washington. Peaceful demonstrators demanded justice for African Americans. The California Labor Federation notesin this new essay that the march was also about labor’s fight for economic justice for all.

Vogel said CTA partnered with the Equal Justice Society to “honor the march and keep alive the work and hopes of the civil rights struggle in California.” Now in its 13th year, the Equal Justice Society is dedicated to fighting for constitutional safeguards against discrimination, with the goal of creating a society where “race is no longer a barrier to opportunity.”

The EJS also works to combat implicit bias from racial and gender stereotypes that CTA also reveals and dispels in our training about overcoming unconscious bias.

                                        Free Lesson Plans On Civil Rights Milestones
To highlight the civil rights struggles, and to learn from the past to create a better future, the EJS has launched this website to promote the milestones that occurred in 1963 and after. To make students comprehend what was at stake, and why the struggles against racism still matter, educators can use these free and dynamic lesson plans for high school and middle school classrooms.

The lesson plans commemorate the 50th anniversaries of civil rights milestones looming in the 2013-2015 period. The milestones honored include the March on Washington of August 28, 1963; President Johnson signing the Civil Rights Act on July 2, 1964; the signing by Johnson of the Voting Rights Act on Aug. 6, 1965; and the signing of the Immigration and Nationality Act on Oct. 3, 1965, by Johnson, at the foot of the Statue of Liberty. The EJS shares concerns about the recent and alarming U.S. Supreme Court ruling that weakens the Voting Rights Act.

With these free lesson plans, students learn about affirmative action, the right to religious freedom, about the fight for racial equality in education, ballot propositions and civil rights, and other key topics.

Saturday’s re-enactment of the march in Los Angeles starts at 8 a.m. in a vacant lot at Marlton Square, 3838 W. Martin Luther King Blvd. and ends at Leimert Park. It’s sponsored by the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Southern California, NAACP and other groups. More details about more Los Angeles events are at www.sclcsocal.org.

Educators planning on attending in Los Angeles include Mary Jan “M.J.” Roberts, the United Teachers Los Angles/NEA vice president and UTLA/NEA affiliate president.

“Dr. King’s words are as true today as they were 50 years ago when he delivered his ‘I Have a Dream’ speech at the March on Washington,” Roberts said. “As a union leader and woman of color, I am proud to honor him. I will be there with my brothers and sisters in Los Angeles on Saturday as we re-enact that historic march.”

                                        Bay Area Aug. 28 Tribute to Unsung Heroes 
On Aug. 28, the Equal Justice Society in Oakland is hosting an original theatrical event honoring the unsung heroes and heroines who powered the civil rights movement, everyday people who took a stand. The night also features an exhibit of original art work inspired by the civil rights struggles. (Get more information here.) Acclaimed musicians, actors and dancers will pay homage to those who led the early battles, and who made a contribution.

The EJS says the themes will be about contributing to make a difference: “This contribution by everyday people was made through their words and ideas, dedication and hard work, and in some cases by sacrificing their lives. We should never forget that the struggle for equality in the 1960s was a war in many ways as important as the conflict abroad at the time.” 
                                                                ###
The 325,000-member CTA is affiliated with the 3.2 million-member National Education Association.