Education: Too much testing?
Gov. Jerry Brown was wrong to veto SB 547, but he made important points about the love of learning.
 Students work on a math lesson at Romero-Cruz Elementary School in Santa Ana. There is now widespread agreement that the federal No Child Left Behind Act was overly rigid, unfair to good schools and constricting to the curriculum. (Los Angeles Times) |
- Share3
- Comments0
The high-stakes measurement of student progress through annual standardized tests has, in many classrooms, restricted creativity, innovation and individuality. It has emphasized the skills involved in taking multiple-choice tests over those of researching, analyzing, experimenting and writing, the tools that students are more likely to need to be great thinkers, excellent university students and valued employees. But, by pressuring schools to raise achievement, it also has ensured that more students reach high school able to read books more sophisticated than those by Dr. Seuss — which, sad to say, was a major problem a decade ago — and tackle algebra by ninth grade.
There is now widespread agreement that the federal No Child Left Behind Act, with its sole emphasis on standardized tests
There is now widespread agreement that the federal No Child Left Behind Act, with its sole emphasis on standardized tests
