Sunday links.
MAY 16, 2010
Red Shirt Movement, Thailand.
Charlie McBarron points out that GOP candidate for governor Bill Brady thinks the difference between telling the truth and telling a lie is just a matter of semantics.
So, Arne. If you call a duck a chicken, is it a chicken?
With Monday as the deadline,only 45% of Washington state’s school districts have signed on to the state’s Race application.
While the North American media continues to ignore the system-wide strike by students at the public University of Puerto Rico, this youtube video showing the police mistreating the father of a student is making the blogs.
Arizona’s superintendent of education wants to ban Paulo Friere’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. I think I know why.
Sent to the NY Times, May 10, 2010
In his speech at Hampton University (“Obama asks graduates to close education gap,” May 9), President Obama remarked that “…students in well-off areas are outperforming students in poorer rural or urban communities, no matter what skin color. Globally, it’s not even close. In 8th grade science and math, for example, American students are ranked about 10th overall compared to top-performing countries.”
The president is correct: Students in those well-off areas, who attend well-funded schools, do very well. They don’t rank 10th overall world-wide: They score at the top on international tests of science and math, while American children in “poorer rural or urban communities” score below the international average. Our overall performance is unimpressive because such a high percentage of children in the US live in poverty, among the highest of all industrialized countries (about 22.5%, compared to Sweden’s 2.5%).
This means that there is nothing seriously wrong with American education. The problem is
In his speech at Hampton University (“Obama asks graduates to close education gap,” May 9), President Obama remarked that “…students in well-off areas are outperforming students in poorer rural or urban communities, no matter what skin color. Globally, it’s not even close. In 8th grade science and math, for example, American students are ranked about 10th overall compared to top-performing countries.”
The president is correct: Students in those well-off areas, who attend well-funded schools, do very well. They don’t rank 10th overall world-wide: They score at the top on international tests of science and math, while American children in “poorer rural or urban communities” score below the international average. Our overall performance is unimpressive because such a high percentage of children in the US live in poverty, among the highest of all industrialized countries (about 22.5%, compared to Sweden’s 2.5%).
This means that there is nothing seriously wrong with American education. The problem is
