Frederick M. Hess's Blog
Stanford's Big Brains Get the Boot
by Frederick M. Hess • Apr 19, 2010 at 9:16 am
Cross-posted from Education Week
 Print |  Send |  RSS |
In my recent book Education Unbound, I argue that a big problem with "best practices"-style reform is that good ideas often don't play out as intended. Even pedigreed ideas that are cooked up by big-brained professors and prove successful at hand-picked pilot sites often fail to deliver at scale.
Most involved in K-12 schooling, of course, are much more enamored of expertise than I. Those in schools of education, in particular, are generally confident that they can identify the right recipes for professional development, instruction, and curricula--and aren't shy about urging those on policymakers and educators.
This is what made the Stanford University Graduate School of Education's charter school such an interesting test case. After all, here was an acclaimed school of education, stuffed with credentialed experts and spending an extra $3,000 per pupil above the state average. Clearly, as Stanford intended when its first charter opened in 2001, this was a chance for Stanford Ed to showcase its faculty's far-reaching prescriptions. Turns out, not so much.
In a truly brutal lead, Carol Pogash wrote last Thursday in The New York Times, "A charter school created and overseen by Stanford University's School of Education was denied an extension of its charter on Wednesday night after several members of the school board labeled it a failure." Citing poor academic performance and lousy classroom behavior management, the trustees of the Ravenswood City School District voted 3-2 to deny
