Teacher Evaluation, the Prequel
Imagine being able to evaluate a teacher before she is even hired! Too good to be true, you say? Read on.
Imagine the ability to hire a teacher that you know in advance will be able to produce those test scores necessary to 1) help your school system stay head and shoulders above your neighbors, 2) help your poorest schools avoid turnaround and charter takeover, or 2) help your charter company gain more contracts in the ESSA era of "no excuses" expansion.
Imagine being able to avoid the mistake of hiring those touchy-feely humanist losers who don't have the "growth mindset" necessary to initiate total compliance neural re-channeling and brain-bathing that has made Angela Duckworth and Carol Dweck the new heroines of 21st Century eugenics.
And imagine being able to take out the messy guesswork of school administrators making subjective decisions about hiring new teachers. None of that squishy intuition or personal connection business between principal and applicant.
What if we had a tool to select new teachers who bring the psychological and demographic characteristics that have been shown to generate high test scores in low-performing schools.
Welcome to TeacherMatch!
In Deefield, IL, the HR office says gut instinct is a thing of the past: "We're not even allowed to mention it during the Schools Matter: Teacher Evaluation, the Prequel:TeacherMatch CEO and co-founder Don Fraynd . . . .say[s] that more data-focused hiring practices can both help districts attract and secure top-notch candidates and more accurately predict whether a teacher will be effective in the classroom.