UFT Unity's Solidarity v. Real Solidarity
I read in NY Teacher that our contract places parents and "educators back in the driver's seat in our city's public schools." I find the claim humorous. I doubt UFT Unity asked many parents what they wanted and I know they certainly didn't ask me. The lack of democracy in my Union is for me, perhaps, the single most depressing aspect of this whole educational war over "reform." The people who are supposed to be protecting me forge ahead, caring little to listen to my concerns or those of the rank and file.
When UFT Unity says "Solidarity," what exactly do they mean?
When UFT Unity says "Solidarity," what exactly do they mean?
1. Does solidarity mean signing a loyalty oath to uphold Unity policies come hell, high water, your conscience or the differing views of your constituency?
If that's solidarity, I am sorry for democracy.
2. Does solidarity mean voting for a contract for which you have never seen the M.o.A. (the 300-member Contract Committee and the Executive Board) or for which the M.o.A. was only released on the eve of the vote (Delegate Assembly), allowing little time for any delegate or his or her constituency to digest it? If solidarity means having so little faith in your own ability to analyze things or so much faith in Unity's ability to spoon feed grown adults, I cannot stomach that flavor of solidarity.
3. Does solidarity mean looking the other way when the contract enshrines principles like selling out your workforce with a second-tier, due-NYC Educator: UFT Unity's Solidarity v. Real Solidarity: