What Got the ED Dept. So Mad About American InterContinental University and its Accreditor?
Last December, the Department of Education’s Inspector General released a bizarre alert memorandum concerning American InterContinental University, a for-profit school with branches throughout the country, and its accreditor, the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (HLC). As Kevin noted at the time, the report certainly seemed like strong stuff, even questioning whether the accreditor should be trusted by the Department. Unfortunately, whole pages worth of redacted information made it impossible to tell exactly what had gotten the Department so incensed.
The Department’s response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by Education Sector helps shed some light on the issue. Though the Department refused to release additional documents related to this issue, it did un-redact more portions of the alert memo (PDF).
Based upon this new information, we now know that the accreditor’s concerns about AIU stemmed from the school’s offering of 9 credits for individual undergraduate and graduate courses, mostly in the business department—classes that the alert memo refers as being “inflated in credit.” According to Jeff Leshay, a
QUICK Hits
RTT Commentary Edition. (Really–was there other news this week?)
Has RTT “engineered the kind of wholesale reform that ordinarily would take a generation to pull off?” (USA Today)
Other than Delaware and Tennessee, was “stakeholder support’ the big winner on Monday? (Politics K-12)
Will the winning states get enough public pressure that they have to deliver on their promises? (Nashville Tennessean)
Will there be pressure for losing states to get their act together for Round II? (Detroit News)
The Department’s response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by Education Sector helps shed some light on the issue. Though the Department refused to release additional documents related to this issue, it did un-redact more portions of the alert memo (PDF).
Based upon this new information, we now know that the accreditor’s concerns about AIU stemmed from the school’s offering of 9 credits for individual undergraduate and graduate courses, mostly in the business department—classes that the alert memo refers as being “inflated in credit.” According to Jeff Leshay, a
QUICK Hits
RTT Commentary Edition. (Really–was there other news this week?)
Has RTT “engineered the kind of wholesale reform that ordinarily would take a generation to pull off?” (USA Today)
Other than Delaware and Tennessee, was “stakeholder support’ the big winner on Monday? (Politics K-12)
Will the winning states get enough public pressure that they have to deliver on their promises? (Nashville Tennessean)
Will there be pressure for losing states to get their act together for Round II? (Detroit News)