FOUNDING FATHERS AND MODERN JUSTICE
A TALE OF POWER, PRIVILEGE, AND A FEW QUESTIONABLES CHOICES
PART I: The Founding Fathers: Wealth, Privilege, Democracy, and a Dash of Accountability
Ah, the Founding Fathers—those powdered-wig-wearing, quill-wielding architects of a nation. We often imagine them as larger-than-life figures, debating liberty and justice under the flickering glow of candlelight. But let’s be real: these guys weren’t exactly starving artists scribbling away in a drafty attic. No, they were more like the 18th-century equivalent of tech billionaires—minus the hoodies, plus a lot more waistcoats.
Let’s address the powdered elephant in the room: wealth and privilege. The Founding Fathers weren’t just your average Joes (or average Georges). Many of them were landowners, merchants, or lawyers who had more money than they could fit in their horse-drawn carriages. George Washington, for example, wasn’t just the first president—he was also one of the richest men in America, thanks to his sprawling Mount Vernon estate and, let’s not forget, enslaved labor. Thomas Jefferson? Another member of the "I Own a Plantation" club. These were men who could afford to sit around and ponder the nature of democracy because they weren’t busy worrying about how to pay rent.
But here’s where it gets interesting: despite their privileged positions, these guys had the audacity to dream up a system that didn’t just serve their own interests (well, not *entirely*, anyway). They could’ve just written a constitution that said, “All power to us and our buddies,” slapped a wax seal on it, and called it a day. Instead, they decided to gamble on this wild idea called democracy. You know, government by the people, for the people—although back then “the people” was mostly code for “white male property owners.” Baby steps, folks.
Still, you have to give them credit for trying to create something that balanced power and held leaders accountable. They were like chefs experimenting with a new recipe: “Okay, let’s throw in some checks and balances, sprinkle in a separation of powers, and bake it in the oven of revolution. Hope it doesn’t burn!” And while their initial draft wasn’t perfect (see: slavery, lack of women’s rights), it laid the groundwork for a system that could evolve over time.
Accountability was a big deal to these guys—or at least the idea of it was. They didn’t want another King George situation where one guy got to call all the shots while everyone else just grumbled into their tea. So they built mechanisms like impeachment and term limits to keep power in check. Of course, whether those mechanisms have always worked as intended is another story. Let’s just say the Founding Fathers probably didn’t foresee Twitter feuds or 24-hour news cycles.
But here’s the kicker: for all their flaws—and there were *many*—the Founding Fathers managed to create a system that has endured for over two centuries. Sure, it’s been patched up and revised more times than your average software update, but it’s still kicking. And maybe that’s the most remarkable thing about them. They weren’t perfect saints or omniscient geniuses; they were just a bunch of wealthy dudes with some big ideas and an even bigger willingness to take risks.
So the next time you hear someone wax poetic about the Founding Fathers, remember this: they were human. Flawed, privileged, ambitious humans who somehow managed to pull off one of history’s greatest experiments. And if that doesn’t make you feel better about your own messy attempts at adulting, I don’t know what will.
In the meantime, let’s raise a glass (or maybe a quill) to the messy, imperfect experiment that is democracy—and to the hope that we can keep improving it. After all, if a bunch of wealthy landowners in powdered wigs could dream big, so can we.
PART II: The Supreme Court: When Justice Peeks Through Her Blindfold
Once upon a time, the law was the great equalizer, a blindfolded lady holding scales to weigh justice fairly for all. But over the last 40 years, it seems the Supreme Court has been fiddling with her blindfold, letting a few influential folks sneak a peek and tip those scales in their favor. The result? An evolving judicial landscape where corporations have personalities, presidents have immunity, and billionaires have privileges that would make even Gatsby blush.
Let’s start with the curious case of corporations. Thanks to a series of rulings, corporations have been granted "personhood." Yes, you read that right—your local coffee chain and the multinational tech giant now have rights akin to your Aunt Susan. They can donate to political campaigns, claim free speech, and probably even cry during sad movies (okay, maybe not that last one). But while you and I are busy paying taxes and trying to remember to separate our recyclables, these corporate “persons” are busy lobbying for tax breaks and deregulations. It’s like giving a toddler a cookie jar and then acting surprised when they eat all the cookies.
And then there’s presidential immunity. Once upon a time, the idea of holding leaders accountable was a cornerstone of democracy. But somewhere along the way, that cornerstone got swapped out for a wobbly Jenga block. The Supreme Court has made it increasingly difficult to hold sitting presidents accountable for their actions. Whether it’s questionable tweets or inciting insurrections, it seems our leaders are now shielded by an invisible cloak of immunity that would make Harry Potter jealous.
But wait, there’s more! Let’s talk about the billionaire elites and oligarchs who seem to have their own VIP section in the courtroom. The law was once a system of accountability, a way to ensure no one was above it. Yet today, it feels like the elite class has found a secret backdoor out of the courthouse. From Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous “sex island” escapades to tax loopholes so big you could drive a yacht through them, accountability for the rich and powerful is becoming as rare as a unicorn sighting.
Meanwhile, the rest of us are left scratching our heads, wondering when democracy became a spectator sport. The law was supposed to be blind, impartial, and fair. Instead, it’s starting to feel like Lady Justice is playing favorites, handing out immunity cards like she’s hosting a game of Monopoly for the 1%.
So where does that leave us? Well, if history has taught us anything, it’s that systems can change—but only if we demand it. Maybe it’s time we remind Lady Justice to tighten her blindfold and put those scales back in balance. After all, democracy isn’t supposed to be a playground for the elite; it’s supposed to be a system where everyone—corporations and billionaires included—plays by the same rules.
Until then, we’ll be here—watching from the sidelines with a healthy dose of skepticism and maybe a little sarcasm too. Because if we can’t hold the powerful accountable just yet, we can at least hold them up to scrutiny. And who knows? Maybe one day Lady Justice will tighten her blindfold and tip those scales back into balance.
.png)
.png)
.png)
