Judge rejects challenge to Minnesota teacher tenure laws
Lawsuit filed by education reform groups was third of its kind in the nation.
A Ramsey County judge on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit challenging Minnesota teacher tenure laws, rejecting its arguments that the laws protect ineffective teachers and deprive low-income and minority students of a high-quality education.
The suit, filed in April by national and local education reform groups, argued that state laws shield veteran teachers from layoffs even when they perform poorly. Senior teachers receive notice if their job is in question and a hearing to defend themselves against termination, whereas teachers with less seniority lack those protections.
The lawsuit, the third of its kind in the nation, was dismissed by Ramsey District Judge Margaret Marrinan on the grounds that it failed to establish a link between low academic achievement and the due process provided by the tenure laws.
Denise Specht, president of Education Minnesota, the state’s teachers union, said Wednesday that she was not surprised.
“We are really hoping that we can move beyond today’s decision,” she said. “I hope we can talk about ways to recruit and retain great educators. … Talking about how teachers are laid off is simply not how we are going to get better outcomes for students.”
Court vs. Legislature
In July, state and school district lawyers asked the court to dismiss the suit. Changing tenure laws should be considered by the Legislature and not the court, Alethea Huyser, an associate attorney solicitor general, argued at the time.
She said districts already can fire ineffective teachers and that the plaintiffs didn’t show that tenure laws directly hurt their children.
The Minnesota lawsuit, filed on behalf of the parents of five children, sparked concern among teachers’ advocates after a California judge ruled that state’s tenure laws unconstitutional. They were heartened in April when the California Appeals Court rejected the claims of harm and said it was up to the state legislature to set education policy. In August, the California Supreme Court declined to hear the case.
For the plaintiffs, the case is not over. “We are not pleased with the result,” said Jesse Stewart, an attorney representing the plaintiffs. “An appeal is certainly an option.”
Partnership for Education Justice, a group founded by former CNN anchor Campbell Brown that sponsored a similar tenure challenge in New York, backed the Minnesota case on behalf of the parents, as did Students for Education Reform Minnesota.
Critics disappointed
Latasha Gandy, executive director of the latter group, said she was “very Judge tosses suit challenging Minn. teacher tenure laws - StarTribune.com: