Latest News and Comment from Education

Monday, December 2, 2013

School reforms revive decades-old debate on impact of money on education outcomes | EdSource Today

School reforms revive decades-old debate on impact of money on education outcomes | EdSource Today:

20110117-Staff_CW_Louis_Freedberg-0055BW_vertical_web-209x3001.jpg
Louis Freedberg
The dramatic transformation of how California’s schools are funded is raising one of the most complex and challenging questions on the education policy landscape: Will additional money improve student academic outcomes?
The debate has been raging for decades – at least back to the landmark 1966 Coleman Report, a massive study headed by sociologist James Coleman for the U.S. Office of Education, which concluded that external factors such as parental income and education and resources in the home had a far greater impact on student achievement than levels of funding and any number of school programs.
The new funding plan championed by Gov. Jerry Brown and approved by the Legislature last summer will funnel additional money to school districts and charter schools based on the number of low-income students, English learners and foster children they serve. The extra funds are based on the argument that it costs more money to educate children from disadvantaged backgrounds, and with additional support, students will in the long run do better.
However, the school funding plan does not specify where or how districts must spend their funds. In fact, a central feature of the plan is to give school districts unprecedented local control over the money they receive from the state, in the belief that they know better than Sacramento what approaches will work best for their children.
The pressure will now be on those school districts to show that the infusion of funds will lead to better academic outcomes.
Relieved of numerous state mandates known as “categorical programs,” school districts now have enormous freedom to decide how to spend additional state funds, such as expanding preschool classes, reducing K-3 class sizes, hiring more counselors or teacher aides, repairing aging