Chicago school Inspector General: testing company conduct “egregious”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/301d9/301d9e603359f8b0f5555650e32a90935bfbd359" alt="Taking Test"
The OIG report refers to them as Vendor A and Vendor B but the Tribune has identified A as HMH and B as Pearson.
The OIG calls HMH’s conduct “egregious” and recommended “significant sanctions… ranging from a large fine to some term of debarment” or, essentially, firing:
In almost any other case involving such blatant attempts to influence a CPS employee with valuable benefits and subvert CPS’s ethical guidelines, the OIG would recommend permanent debarment. The OIG, however, recognized that given its large role in providing educational materials, debarring Vendor A could potentially do more harm than good by limiting the scope of educational materials available to CPS classrooms and/or limiting competition, which in turn could