Latest News and Comment from Education

Friday, August 7, 2015

Thompson: This American Life, School Integration, & The Ultimate School Reform Excuse This Week In Education:

This Week In Education: Thompson: This American Life, School Integration, & The Ultimate School Reform Excuse:

Thompson: This American Life, School Integration, & The Ultimate School Reform Excuse






Former Pro-Publia writer Nikole Hannah-Jones, in School Segregation, the Continuing Tragedy of Ferguson, recalls of the inescapable truth that educators once acknowledged, and that we now need to remember. Children who attend the most segregated schools, Hannah-Jones reminds us, “are more likely to be poor. They are more likely to go to jail. They are less likely to graduate from high school, to go to college, and to finish if they go. They are more likely to live in segregated neighborhoods as adults.” Moreover, “their children are more likely to also attend segregated schools, repeating the cycle.”
Contributing to a continuing series by ProPublica and the New York Times on segregation, Hannah-Jones reports that “over the past 15 years …. the number of so-called apartheid schools — schools whose white population is 1 percent or less — has shot up. The achievement gap, greatly narrowed during the height of school desegregation, has widened.”
The national market-driven, test-driven school reform movement has downplayed the damage done by segregation. It’s choice-driven policies have actually increased the separation of students by race and class. And, This American Life’s The Problem We All Live With, featuring Hannah-Jones, begins with a mention of the research which explains why NCLB-type reforms have failed to improve schools serving neighborhoods with a critical mass of families from generational poverty. In doing so, it properly articulates the question that must be tackled before school improvement and other policies can promote racial justice and economic equality.
Accountability-driven reformers proclaimed their movement as the civil rights campaign of the 21stcentury, but they haven’t found a viable path towards school improvement. Competition-driven reformers derided traditional educators, who embrace socio-economic integration, early education, and full-service community schools, for allegedly making “excuses” and shifting attention away from the supposed real issue – bad teaching. But, This American Life has it right; reformers using competition-driven policies to improve instruction within the four walls of the classroom are distracting attention from the true problem.


One of the biggest opportunity costs of the instruction-driven, competition-driven reform movement is that it shifted energy and resources away from desegregation.  Hannah-Jones reminds us that in 1983, St. Louis began “the nation’s most successful metro-wide desegregation program.” The desegregation experiment wasn’t perfect, but “test scores for 8th and 10th grade transfer students rose. The transfer students were more likely to graduate and go onto college. … In surveys, white students overwhelmingly said they’d benefited from the opportunity to be educated alongside black students.”
But, as Amy Stuart Wells documented, the plug was pulled on the program and St. Louis became “the epicenter of where people tried to grapple with race, and failed miserably.” Then, in 2009, the state This Week In Education: Thompson: This American Life, School Integration, & The Ultimate School Reform Excuse: