Latest News and Comment from Education

Sunday, April 12, 2015

CORE Districts are "Fronts" for Gates, Waltons, Broad et al

CORE Districts:

CORE Districts are "Fronts" for Gates, Waltons, Broad et al



Virginia Adams Simon (Ginger), Director of Professional Capital

As Director of Professional Capital for CORE, Ginger will lead the work to implement required systems related to the ESEA Waiver’s School Quality Improvement System, Principle 3, as well as support meaningful learning opportunities to engage participants in collaborative cultures around the most critical issues of professional capital facing our schools. Ginger’s early career was as a teacher and school administrator in schools in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. In the last 10 years, her work turned to education policy where she worked at education policy centers at two universities, conducted educational research, developed policy, managed implementation efforts and led numerous large projects involving educators and education stakeholders. She most recently served as senior associate with Cross & Joftus, LLC, a national education consulting firm. In this capacity, she led numerous projects with clients such as the California Department of Education, LA Charter Schools, and Smithsonian Education Museum Studies. Ginger has considerable expertise in the area of value-added assessment and is the co-author of several articles and sole author of a chapter on using student growth measures and value-added as part of teacher evaluation. While Associate Director at the Center for Greater Philadelphia at the University of Pennsylvania, she worked with a consortium of districts to engage in shared learning around new evaluation models and provided hands-on technical assistance and training to districts implementing value-added assessment. Ginger received both her master’s and doctorate in Education Leadership from the University of Pennsylvania.
Contact Ginger at Ginger@Caedpartners.org



Cross & Joftus, LLC, a national education consulting firm




FOUNDATIONS


Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Cross & Joftus provided operational support to the District of Columbia’s State Superintendent as she implemented her strategic initiatives. Building on work done for the Joyce Foundation, we also developed an in-depth understanding of the policy and advocacy environment in Illinois for advancing education reform. This project included interviews with key stakeholders and leaders involved in state-level education issues in Illinois. The objective was to determine where and how the philanthropic community could invest effectively in strengthening education reform in the state. In addition, we authored a guide for district leaders on the development of a high-performing system of schools. Cross & Joftus also wrote a guide for district leaders on developing a high-performing system of schools and a policy paper describing the foundation’s vision for high school reform. www.gatesfoundation.org
Broad Foundation
Our firm advised superintendents trained by the Broad Center for Superintendents on how to use the No Child Left Behind Act to leverage educational improvement. www.broadfoundation.org
C.S. Mott Foundation
Cross & Joftus helped the foundation develop resources to support school districts and other organizations seeking to expand learning time. This work involved identifying financing models for expanded learning time, documenting successful financing strategies that could be replicated in other places, and providing technical assistance to states and localities seeking to sustain expanded learning programs and policies. We also provided technical assistance to five states that were working to better align their after school and early care activities. Finally, we wrote Dollars and Sense: A First Look at Financing a New Day for Learning, a paper on financing strategies for expanded learning. www.mott.org
Ellis Center for Educational Excellence (Ellis Center)
Our firm advised a new foundation on a strategy to have the maximum and sustainable effect on a limited number of school districts in the Phoenix area. We also advised the Ellis Center on staffing, strategic implementation, evaluation, and management. We also conducted an evaluation of the Center’s district improvement initiative. This included funding WestED to work closely with Creighton (AZ) School District in implementing comprehensive, systemic reform that will result in increased student achievement and a narrowing of achievement gaps. In addition, we helped the Center develop and facilitate a national advisory board that will inform their work. www.educatingarizona.org
Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
Cross & Joftus developed, implemented, and evaluated an education policy and advocacy campaign intended to improve education policy making in the states of Kansas and Missouri. On behalf of chairperson Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius, our firm also conducted a strategic planning effort for the Education Commission of the States. Cross & Joftus helped the foundation plan strategically for its multimillion-dollar, 10-year initiative to improve math and science education in the United States. Finally, we drafted a policy paper based on Missouri Governor Matt Blunt’s science, technology, engineering, and math statewide summit. www.kauffman.org
Ford Foundation
With the Ford Foundation, we are working with the Superintendent and her team in Elizabeth, New Jersey to analyze district expenditures with the ultimate goal of better aligning resources to priorities including expanded learning.
Foundation for the Carolinas
Cross & Joftus analyzed governance and management systems of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg (NC) School System and provided recommendations for improvement, including a blueprint for a citizen’s committee to monitor and support the CMS school system. www.fftc.org
Frontline Healthcare Workers Safety Foundation
Our firm designed and conducted evaluations of the foundation’s biosafety and biocontainment courses for emergency first responders and frontline healthcare workers. www.frontlinefoundation.org
Haan Foundation for Children
Our firm provided strategic communication support to the Power4Kids Initiative, a $10 million research study of interventions for struggling elementary school readers. www.haan4kids.org
Hall Family Foundation
We conducted a review of the foundation’s education grants and that assisted with the development of a strategy for future education grantmaking. www.hallfamilyfoundation.org
Hewlett, Gates, Irvine, and Stuart Foundations
Our firm developed and implemented a comprehensive, multistage policy development, communications, and advocacy strategy to help translate research on the California education system for whole system improvement. www.hewlett.org,www.gatesfoundation.orgwww.irvine.org, and www.stuartfoundation.org
Joyce Foundation
We studied the creation of state education advocacy organizations across the country to determine lessons learned and the potential impact of new organizations in certain states. We also assisted the foundation and the New Teacher Center in the development of a regional conference consisting of leaders from three states to develop policies for advancing high-quality teacher induction programs in those states, with particular emphasis on the establishment of programs in the major cities.www.joycefdn.org
Nellie Mae Education Foundation
Cross & Joftus provided support to the Foundation’s leadership team as they implement their District Level Systems Change initiative that creates opportunities to expand student centered learning approaches.  This included supporting the foundation in selecting grantees and then working with the foundation and grantees to develop sustainability strategies and areas where resources can be reallocate to support promising strategies. We are continuing to support the foundation as they roll out their next round of grant-making to 5 districts that are implementing student-centered learning initiatives and to work with grantees on developing long-term budgets and sustainability plans.www.nmefdn.org
Rogers Development Foundation
Cross & Joftus conducted a comprehensive needs analysis and developed a strategic plan for Rogers (Arkansas) School District, a rapidly growing and increasingly diverse school district serving 13,000 students. The needs analysis engaged district administrators and community leaders in a process of inquiry that modeled a process of continuous improvement and resulted in the identification of strengths and weaknesses related to the district’s management and governance systems. The strategic planning process used the results of the needs analysis to develop short- and long-term goals, measurable objectives, and actionable strategies that should result in systemic improvement. Cross & Joftus will be working with the school system and Foundation to help implement the strategic plan over the next few years. www.rogerslowell.com
Say Yes to Education Foundation
In support of the work of Say Yes to Education, C&J produced a video that demonstrates the power of the SYTE model in substantially increasing post-secondary completion by all graduates of Syracuse public schools. In addition, Gene Maeroff, former national education correspondent for the New York Times, has been commissioned to write a book documenting SYTE work in Syracuse. That book, Reforming a School System, Reviving a City: The Promise of Say Yes to Education in Syracuse is scheduled to be published November 19, 2013 by Palgrave Macmillan.

In addition, C&J Chairman Christopher Cross serves as a key adviser to SYTE on matters of strategy.www.sayyestoeducation.org
Wallace Foundation
Cross & Joftus is supporting a three-year project to provide technical assistance on finance and sustainability to the Wallace Foundation’s Next Generation After School Systems Building Initiative. The TA team for this project includes C&J, The National League of Cities, the National Institute of Out-of-School Learning, and the Gardner Center at Stanford University. We are supporting nine cities as they strengthen their afterschool infrastructure, implement quality enhancements and expand OST programming.

In addition, the Wallace Foundation engaged C&J to develop an assessment framework and process for identifying and strengthening alignment with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for members of the Expanded Learning Opportunities Professional Learning Community (ELO-PLC).  Building on our approaches being used to support schools and districts that are readying themselves for the CCSS, the ELO CCSS Alignment Project will identify opportunities to build bridges between what programs are currently doing and the Common Core based on the mission and activities of the programs.www.wallacefoundation.org
Walton Family Foundation
Cross & Joftus conducted a statewide needs analysis and a strategic plan for a new nonprofit that provides technical assistance to and advocates on the behalf of public charter schools and small, rural, traditional public schools. In partnership with Triand, Inc., Cross & Joftus worked with the Arkansas Department of Education and a consortium of six Arkansas districts to improve the use of data and technology in fostering whole-system improvement. Cross & Joftus conducted an evaluation of district and state implementation of and satisfaction with the statewide data system and provided recommendations to all stakeholders for improvements, including how to use data more effectively to inform the teaching and learning process.www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org

Rick Miller, Executive Director

Rick Miller serves as the Executive Director of the CORE districts. Prior to joining CORE, Miller was the Deputy State Superintendent for P-16 Policy and Information Branch of the California Department of Education.  In this position, Miller developed policy recommendations on promising ways to improve student achievement throughout California specifically focused on closing the state’s achievement gaps from PreK to Higher Education. Prior to his time at the California Department of Education, Miller worked at Microsoft Corporation developing communications strategies on privacy, security, and overall corporate image.  Miller also served as a strategic communications advisor to the Chancellor of the California State University System (CSU). Prior to working at CSU, Miller served the U.S. Department of Education in Washington D.C. as Press Secretary to Richard W. Riley, Secretary of Education in the Clinton Administration. Miller also spent time during those years periodically detailed to the White House Office of Advance where he traveled domestically and internationally on behalf of President Clinton. Miller also serves on the Education Advisory Board for the Region IX Equity Assistance Center as well as on the Board of Directors for Rocklin Academy Family of Schools. He lives in Rocklin, California with his wife, Julie, an elementary school speech therapist and their two sons, Casey and Ryan.
Contact Rick at: rick@capimpactllc.com


Noah Bookman, Chief Accountability Officer

Noah Bookman is the Chief Accountability Officer for CORE Districts, supporting the districts in implementing a first of its kind whole child approach to school accountability. Before CORE, Noah served as the Director of Performance Management for the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). His responsibilities involved developing and implementing a coherent system to articulate, monitor and deliver outcomes for schools, for the regional and central office units that support and manage schools, and for the operational divisions of the District’s central office. Noah also played a leadership role in the District’s educator effectiveness initiative. Prior to re-joining LAUSD, Noah served as a Managing Director at the After-School-All-Stars (ASAS), a national after-school program for at-risk youth. Before ASAS he was an English teacher in the Los Angeles Unified School District and served as Enrollment Director at the Oakland Unified School District. He is a graduate of University of California, Los Angeles and has a Masters in Public Policy from the University of California’s Goldman School of Public Policy.

Contact Noah at: Noah@caedpartners.org



Michelle Steagall, Chief Academic Officer

As the CORE Chief Academic Officer, Michelle Steagall is responsible for bridging the work to support the implementation of Common Core Standards and promoting teacher and principal effectiveness across the eight CORE partner districts. Michelle brings 23 years of school district experience to her work at CORE.  She began her educational career as a multi-graded classroom teacher amidst thousands of acres of wheat fields in rural North Eastern Oregon.  In 1990 she moved to California to join the Clovis Unified School District family where she served as a teacher, assistant principal in intermediate and elementary schools, an elementary principal and the associate superintendent for curriculum and instruction.  Additionally, Michelle served for six years as the superintendent of the Clay Joint Elementary School District and the Chowchilla School District both located in the diverse heart of California, the San Joaquin Valley. Michelle earned a Masters in Educational Administration from Fresno State, a Doctorate in Educational Leadership from the University of La Verne in Southern California and is a licensed curriculum auditor.  As a superintendent she was selected and served on various state wide committees with the California School Boards Association.
Contact Michelle at: michelle@caedpartners.org



Shannah Estep, Manager of Curriculum Integration

 As Manager of Curriculum Integration, Shannah’s work focuses on promoting deeper learning by integrating curriculum in the core  subject areas as well as the arts, specifically implementing the new Common Core standards. Shannah brings 20 years of experience in education, most recently writing Common Core curriculum and assessments for an educational foundation through Fresno Pacific University. Shannah began her career as a math and science teacher for a local junior high and through her years in the classroom, she taught many grades K-6.  In 2005, she left the classroom and joined the Fresno County Office of Education as a math consultant. At the county office, Shannah served as a professional development specialist, and during that time, completed her Master’s in Education at Fresno State University with a math education emphasis.
Contact Shannah at: shannah@caedpartners.org



Virginia Adams Simon (Ginger), Director of Professional Capital

As Director of Professional Capital for CORE, Ginger will lead the work to implement required systems related to the ESEA Waiver’s School Quality Improvement System, Principle 3, as well as support meaningful learning opportunities to engage participants in collaborative cultures around the most critical issues of professional capital facing our schools. Ginger’s early career was as a teacher and school administrator in schools in Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. In the last 10 years, her work turned to education policy where she worked at education policy centers at two universities, conducted educational research, developed policy, managed implementation efforts and led numerous large projects involving educators and education stakeholders. She most recently served as senior associate with Cross & Joftus, LLC, a national education consulting firm. In this capacity, she led numerous projects with clients such as the California Department of Education, LA Charter Schools, and Smithsonian Education Museum Studies. Ginger has considerable expertise in the area of value-added assessment and is the co-author of several articles and sole author of a chapter on using student growth measures and value-added as part of teacher evaluation. While Associate Director at the Center for Greater Philadelphia at the University of Pennsylvania, she worked with a consortium of districts to engage in shared learning around new evaluation models and provided hands-on technical assistance and training to districts implementing value-added assessment. Ginger received both her master’s and doctorate in Education Leadership from the University of Pennsylvania.
Contact Ginger at Ginger@Caedpartners.org


Hilary McLean, Director of Communications

 

Hilary McLean is a communications expert with two decades of experience in public affairs. Her background includes serving as the Communications Director for the California Department of Education, where she led the department’s messaging focus on closing the achievement gap, and as Chief Deputy Press Secretary for Governor Gray Davis, where she developed and managed communications strategy on a wide variety of political and public policy issues.  Hilary previously led the earned media efforts on a number of successful political campaigns, including the 1998 election of Bill Lockyer as Attorney General and the defeat of Propositions 200, 201, and 202 in 1996. In 1994, Hilary was selected as a California State Senate Fellow. As a Senate Fellow, Ms. McLean served on the staff of then-Senator Mike Thompson as a Legislative Aide.  Prior to her Senate Fellowship, Hilary spent several years as a television news reporter and assignment editor.
Contact Hilary at: hilary@capimpactllc.com



RoLesia Holman, Program Manager

RoLesia holds a BS in Education from the University of Maryland and an MA in Educational Policy and Leadership from The Ohio State University. She will be joining us following her recent completion of teaching and administrative positions in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). RoLesia is well grounded in public education gained from a decade of classroom teaching positions in Ohio and Maryland. Prior to that, she held career related positions at The Ohio State University. Early in her career, she served as a Resident Director with the Institute for Shipboard Education/Semester at Sea program. In this role, she traveled to nine countries on the three continents of South America, Africa, and Asia. This experience fueled her interest and curiosity regarding international education. Her passion for educational excellence for all children has led to positions and affiliations focused on equity and school reform. She served as a School Change Coach with the Center for Collaborative Education and as Director of Small Schools Project with the Black Alliance for Educational Options. She is a National Facilitator with the National School Reform Faculty and also served as a Board Member.  Since 2005, she has had varied experiences as the Proprietor of Sojourner Educational Services, designing and facilitating seminars on professional learning communities, providing coaching for small school start-ups and conversions, and providing professional development for school leaders, teachers, and parents.
Contact RoLesia at RoLesia@caedpartners.org


Jina Kim-Qvale, Program Manager

Jina began working in the field of education 16 years ago. She worked as a teacher in both public and private settings, and then as a Teacher Specialist. She served five years as an assistant principal and four as a principal. In 2010, she designed and opened an elementary pilot school, Ambassador School of Global Education, in Los Angeles Unified School District located on the historic RFK Community Schools complex. As part of an internal reform movement, Ambassador School of Global Education is a hub of innovation located in the center of Pico Union and Koreatown. Jina received her bachelor’s degree in Sociology and Psychology from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). She continued at UCLA to receive her master’s degree in Education and Pepperdine University for her master’s in Administration. In 2012, Jina received an Ed.D. through the UCLA Educational Leadership Program. Jina resides happily in Los Angeles with her husband, son, daughter, and dog.
Contact Jina at jina@caedpartners.org



Nathalie Umaña , School Support Program Coordinator

Nathalie started her career in education working for LA’s BEST (Better Educated Students for Tomorrow) as an after-school tutor and sports coach. She also worked as a paraprofessional in an elementary school in Southern California. While pursuing her undergraduate degree, she was a Corps Member for AmeriCorps’ Jumpstart program, where she implemented an early literacy program with preschool children. After graduating from San Francisco State University, she moved across the country to serve as a Teach For America Corps Member in Camden, New Jersey, where Nathalie worked as a first grade teacher. During her time as a Corps Member, she also attended graduate school at the University of Pennsylvania. For her master’s thesis, she researched teacher attrition rates and satisfaction rates in Camden’s charter schools. After finishing her two year commitment and receiving her Master of Science in Education from UPENN, Nathalie moved back to California and began working as a teacher in the San Francisco Unified School District. In addition to teaching, she served as a member of the professional development team at her school, planning, scheduling, and designing staff professional development. Nathalie also served as teacher leader for the Math Common Core State Standards implementation study team for the San Francisco Unified School District.
Contact Nathalie at nathalie@caedpartners.org


Sara Almaraz, Event Coordinator/Program Assistant

As Event Coordinator/Program Assistant at CORE, Sara Almaraz is responsible for managing the details of statewide CORE collaborative convenings and events. Sara brings several years of experience in the nonprofit and meetings arenas to CORE. Most recently, she worked in fund development, handling grant proposals, reports and other communication media for a large hunger relief organization in the Central Valley. She has also held positions with the San Francisco Convention & Visitors Bureau and the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, where she was responsible for communications, collateral and marketing efforts. Sara lives in Clovis, California, with her husband Kino, a mechanical engineer, and their daughter Malina.
Contact Sara at Sara@caedpartners.org

CORE Districts

 Big Education Ape: CORE Waivers: The Movement to Privatize California's Public Schools http://bit.ly/1ynynWg

The preceding message was brought to you by the good folks @ 

Saving Students From A Shattered System: Brainstorming Choice

Saving Students From A Shattered System: Brainstorming Choice:

Brainstorming Choice

There have been many arguments for and against parental choice. It really comes down to one issue. It is the belief that when your child is in a school where the students have low test scores, your child will make smaller gains in academics.  When your child is in a school with students who have higher test scores, your child will be more likely to make greater gains.

Let us take a deeper look at this issue:

First, test scores are not a sole indicator of academic achievement. They are, at best, 2nd class achievement.  Whole child learning, where a child demonstrates what they are able to do, is 1st class achievement. However, the problem is the mandated test drives the curriculum of the school. And teach to the test becomes the curriculum leaving the perception that kids in higher scoring schools end up being taught to the test better than those with kids in lower scoring schools based on those test results. This may or may not be the case but perceptions are real to those who have them. The reality is that the segregation of classes and in many cases races are in full force.

Second, with every child having the same singular standard it becomes essential to seek out the school that will enhance your child's standard the most. whether the standards are 1st or 2nd class, their is still a rush to find the school that will support you child the most.

Most schools make every effort to see that your child will achieve at the highest level. The reality is the current system of education forces "artificial choice" to become an issue. The current system is based on a poorly designed race that takes kids who are successful in the narrow scope of education to college and those who aren't to struggle for survival.  And the lack of survival puts kids on the streets.

What if we had an individual pathway to success for every child, an action plan to support learning for all? What if the system and philosophy of a school system was allowed to innovate away from Saving Students From A Shattered System: Brainstorming Choice:





Will you stink up the privatization garden party with me? | Cloaking Inequity

Will you stink up the privatization garden party with me? | Cloaking Inequity:

Will you stink up the privatization garden party with me?

58a05a8d_o
The fix is in folks. We need a war against the ultra wealthy who believe they have a right control everything our government does in education and elsewhere.
At the Cambridge Forum lecture that I gave in Harvard Square at the First Parish (Unitarian Universalist) on March 8, 2015 I discussed the role of wealthy in education reform and the privatization of education (See the post Julian Vasquez Heilig @CamForum to Discuss The Health of Democracy and Privatizing Education). The Director of the Cambridge Forum let me know that the radio program which will be syndicated on NPR across the nation will go to stations via satellite on April 17. Here in Sacramento, KQED airs the Cambridge Forum at 6:30 p.m. on Sundays. Thus it is likely the lecture will air either Sunday April 19 or the next Sunday.

The Cambridge Forum Lecture:
2015-03-08 13.42.51First, I want to thank you for inviting me here today for the Cambridge Forum. If you haven’t had a chance yet, you should go to YouTube and check out the archive of past lectures on the Cambridge Forum feed. As I was preparing for this talk, I watched several previous lectures on YouTube and was inspired by Professor LessigGarrison Keillor, the Onion, several MacArthur Genius award winners and many others who have given this lecture in the past.
Thank you again for having me.
Also, I am glad to be here in Boston. I spent a summer here in Massachusetts in the 1990s when I was a fellow at theEducation Development Center. I fell in love with the New England summer. So much so that I did end up applying to Harvard for my masters and doctorate. Even though I was admitted, I decided not to come to Cambridge for three reasons: a) it was about 70 degrees colder than Stanford California b) Myplane coming into Logan took enemy RPG fire and c) because Boston was awar zone at the time. Now to be honest, only one of those three was a reason I never ended up at Harvard, but it seems these days that public speakers have been exaggerating a little— so I went with it.
If you are here in the audience or listening at home or elsewhere I hope that you will Tweet from today’s conversation to @ProfessorJVH. My Twitter profile is Professor then my three initials J-V-H. I would like to write a post for my popular education blog Cloaking Inequity by integrating your Tweets and audience thoughts at a future date. I’d also like to publicly thank the hundreds of thousands Cloaking Inequity readers who hail from 181 countries around the world.
I’ll begin with a story about the US Constitution
As young children, Americans are inculcated with an admiration of democracy— a “manifest destiny” to see democratic systems spread throughout the world. However, in preparation for this lecture, I pondered the anti-democratic direction of education reform today. I began to ponder the aristocratic forces seeking to invade and pervade public policy when I read an editorial published in a Michigan newspaper that argued that the power to elect U.S. Senators should given back to politicians in state legislatures— as originally stipulated in the Constitution.
As you are probably well aware, the U.S. has not always directly elected Senators. Let me share a bit of history from the U.S. Senate Website.
The framers of the Constitution did not intend senators to be directly elected, and included in Article I, section 3, “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.”
However, the election of US Senators by politicians in the state legislatures got out of hand. Again, from the US Senate Website: 
Intimidation and bribery marked some of the states’ selection of senators. Nine bribery cases were brought before the Senate between 1866 and 1906. In addition, forty-five deadlocks occurred in twenty states between 1891 and 1905, resulting in numerous delays in seating senators. In 1899, problems in electing a senator in Delaware were so acute that the state legislature did not send a senator to Washington for four years.
2015-03-08 13.43.15Muckraker journalist, the bloggers of the early 20th century, (I actually just recently changed the tag line of Cloaking Inequity to “Muckraking since 2012”) Muckraker journalist pushed for direct democracy for the election of U.S. Senators in late 19th century. Again from the US Senate:
After the turn of the century, momentum for reform grew rapidly. William Randolph Hearst hired a veteran reporter, David Graham Phillips, who wrote scathing pieces on senators, portraying them as pawns of industrialists and financiersAs the pressure built from muckrakers and the public, the Senate and then the House advanced the 17th Amendment. The states ratified and the Will you stink up the privatization garden party with me? | Cloaking Inequity:






CORE Waivers: The Movement to Privatize California's Public Schools

Waivers Granted Under No Child Left Behind:





Big Education Ape: CORE waiver is bad idea | Letters to the Editor | FresnoBee.com http://bit.ly/1ynxH3a


Eight California districts receive historic NCLB waiver

Eight California school districts individually(see note below)  will receive the first district waivers from penalties under the No Child Left Behind law, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan announced Tuesday.
Duncan praised the districts’ “creative, thoughtful, innovative proposal.” He said that 1 million students will benefit from the districts’ “rigorous expectations” and that other states will learn from the collaborative strategies that the districts are pledging to carry out. “Frankly, working directly with districts wasn’t an easy decision,” Duncan said. “We’re not taking this up because it was simple, but because it was the right thing to do.”
The one-year waiver, issued after weeks of intense negotiations between federal officials and superintendents in the CORE districts, will free the districts from key sanctions of NCLB and provide them with flexibility to use about $110 million in Title I money for school improvement, including training teachers in Common Core standards. The districts will stop NCLB’s accountability clock, in which additional schools would be labeled as failing, and instead be able to create broader measures of student achievement beyond standardized test scores.


The CORE districts are spread out geographically and represent 1.1 million California students. More than half of those students are from two southern California districts, Los Angeles Unified and Long Beach Unified. Clovis Unified, which is included in the charts, withdrew its application late in the process.
The CORE districts are spread out geographically and represent 1.1 million California students. More than half of those students are from two southern California districts, Los Angeles Unified and Long Beach Unified. Clovis Unified, which is included in the charts, withdrew its application late in the process.


The eight unified districts applying through their umbrella organization, the California Office to Reform Education, or CORE, serve more than one in six students in the state; the districts are Los Angeles, Long Beach, San Francisco, Oakland, Santa Ana, Sanger, Sacramento City and Fresno. Clovis Unified, an original applicant that concluded the waiver was similar to its accountability system, has dropped out.
The waiver comes in the nick of time to take effect this school year. Duncan has issued waivers to 39 states so far and is reviewing applications for five more. An additional six states either have not applied or, like California, had their applications denied.
The waiver, the first that was not issued to a state department of education, has been strongly opposed by state chiefs of education, teachers unions and some advocacy groups that see a district waiver as a potential end run around federal accountability rules. Duncan said in a press conference that the law authorizes him to grant waivers to districts, as previous education secretaries have done for specific provisions. But Chris Minnich, executive director of the Council of Chief State School Officers, characterized the CORE waiver Tuesday as “an unprecedented shift in the federal role in education — clearly usurping state leadership.” California Department of Education officials expressed skepticism as well. In a statement Tuesday, California Teachers Association President Dean Vogel reiterated criticism of the waiver, though primarily for the districts’ failure to consult with local teachers unions in crafting the application, which he termed “counterproductive and divisive.”
The CORE superintendents argued to Duncan that they were seeking a stronger, “holistic” alternative to a narrowly focused and unworkable federal system. Districts, the application said, “have been too often chasing success in a system that does not define success in a comprehensive or rigorous manner.”


U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan during an interview on the PBS program NewsHour.  Source:  NewsHour.  (click to enlarge).
U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan granted the CORE districts’ waiver Tuesday.

Duncan agreed and singled out CORE’s commitment to significantly expand the accountability system to include more minority and special education students than currently required under federal law. CORE’s proposal calls for significantly lowering the number of students represented in a subgroup as part of a school’s accountability measure. The waiver requires any subgroup of 20 or more children in a school to be included, instead of a minimum of 100 students, a threshold that Duncan said left 153,000 children “invisible” in the CORE districts under NCLB. Dozens of elementary schools, for example, in which students with disabilities, Hispanic children or African American children account for between 20 and 99 students will now track the progress of those student groups.
“These students face the same issues of poverty and should be treated with the same notions of accountability,” said Los Angeles Unified Superintendent John Deasy.
Liz Guillen, the legislative director of Public Advocates, a civil rights law firm, said that what the CORE superintendents didn’t say was that this year, under the Local Control Funding Formula, the Legislature lowered the statewide subgroup number to 30 students anyway.
The students will now be measured not only on standardized test results but by broader dimensions of student engagement and performance in a new School Quality Improvement System.
  • Scores on state tests, high school graduation rates and persistence rates – the percentage of 8th graders that go on to enroll in 10th grade — will comprise 60 percent of the index;
  • Factors of school performance, based on parent, teacher and student surveys, rates of redesignating English learners and identifying special education students, with an eye to over-identifying minority students, will comprise 20 percent;
  • CORE will pilot a new domain, making up another 20 percent, of social and emotional factors including rates of chronic absenteeism, suspensions and expulsions and difficult-to-quantify measures of grit and determination that are predictive of success in college or work.
The state also is transitioning to a broader accountability system, although the pieces aren’t in place. The state’s Academic Accountability Index, or API, currently based solely on standardized tests, will incorporate graduation rates and other factors. Legislation establishing the Local Control Funding Formula requires that districts start tracking a range of academic performance metrics, parent involvement and school climate.
Long Beach Superintendent Christopher Steinhauser said that measures under the CORE waiver are “in total alignment” with the new state funding formula. Fresno Unified Superintendent Michael Hanson said that CORE wanted to press forward now to reduce academic disparities affecting low-income and minority students but that CORE’s accountability index would prove valuable to the state. Members of the State Board of Education, in strongly endorsing the waiver earlier this year, agreed.
But in statements on Tuesday, neither Gov. Jerry Brown nor Superintendent of Public Instruction Torlakson was particularly complimentary or pointed to any benefit from the waiver.
“Several local school districts have now received a one-year waiver of the proficiency goals of the No Child Left Behind law,” said Evan Westrup, the governor’s press secretary. “From our perspective, however, the primary challenge is to implement vigorously the landmark Local Control Funding Formula and the Common CORE curriculum.”
“All California schools deserve relief from the unworkable mandates of No Child Left Behind, so it’s noteworthy that a few districts have — temporarily at least — managed to navigate the complex waiver requirements imposed by the Administration,” Torlakson said. “I continue to believe … that relief from the failings of federal policy should not be reserved only for those prepared to provide Washington an ever-expanding role in the operation of California’s public schools.”

A collaborative model

The CORE superintendents based their plan on the work of Canadian author Michael Fullan, who introduced in Ontario a collaborative model of school improvement that he contrasts with the top-down “blame and shame” interventions in which low-performing schools have been closed or their teachers replaced under NCLB.
Instead, CORE will identify highly successful schools and place them as partners with low performers. Fullan emphasizes “non-judgmental” efforts to improve instruction based on a collective “moral imperative” to do right by all children: Only if there is little improvement after several years of work will stronger actions be required.
Fullan, who described this process to 450 CORE district teachers and administrators last week in San Francisco, will likely be hired as an adviser during the waiver’s roll-out. He already has worked in several CORE districts.
CORE’s superintendents, however, can expect initial resistance.
Vogel and union leaders in the CORE districts blasted the superintendents for paying lip service to Fullan while ignoring them in the creation of a waiver that includes commitments for new teacher evaluations.
“I’m extremely disappointed,” said Susan Mercer, president of the Santa Ana Teachers Association. The wavier “takes away the voice of the teachers. It’s top-down and a step backward. Reform only happens when everyone works together to make change.”
While  acknowledging that unions were not involved in developing the waiver, Deasy said “they must be involved as we start our journey today.” And he said that nothing in the waiver superseded teachers’ bargaining rights.

Two evaluation options

To qualify for a waiver, the CORE districts had to commit to use growth in student achievement as a factor in teacher and principal evaluations. Most teachers unions oppose this, although the Stull Act, the state law on evaluations, also requires it.
CORE’s application offered two options.
  • The Massachusetts alternative: Based on that state’s NCLB waiver, results from standardized and other tests would be used indirectly, as a check. If test scores didn’t agree with an evaluation based on classroom observations and other criteria, the district would take a second look to identify the discrepancy and could create a one-year improvement plan for the teacher.
  • The 20 percent minimum: Growth in student achievement, based a model that the CORE districts will develop, will comprise a minimum of 20 percent of a teacher’s or principal’s evaluation. Districts with their own models, like Los Angeles Unified, could seek approval to use their variations from the CORE board of directors.
This year, the districts will consult with unions on the criteria for an evaluation; bargaining would occur after the first year of a waiver. A new system would take effect in the third year of a waiver, assuming there is one. If teachers did not agree to one of the options, the district would no longer qualify for a waiver.

Cross-section of outside monitors

The approved waiver has several key changes from what CORE had proposed in May:
  • The waiver is for one year, not three. Duncan said he had imposed the same limitation on several other states and implied the CORE waiver could be folded into a future state waiver or extended if the state did not obtain one next year.
  • The waiver applies to only the eight districts this year. CORE had proposed to offer the waiver to any district that met the federal criteria and agreed to the rules of the consortium.
  • CORE created a 14-member School Quality Improvement System Oversight Panel to add teeth to the accountability system. CORE had proposed a decentralized system based on peer review and a board of directors. The oversight panel, meeting twice a year, will review the districts’ data and school improvement plans. For districts disregarding data requirements or chronically failing to show student improvement, the panel can recommend that the federal Department of Education yank their waivers.
Its biannual meetings  will be subject to the state’s open meeting law. Among those who will appoint one representative are the governor, the State Board of Education, the California Teachers Association, the California School Boards Association, the State Board of Education, the Association of California School Administrators Association, the state PTA, the California County Superintendents Education Services Association, Education Trust-West (an advocate for minority students), the California Collaborative on District Reform and groups representing students with disabilities, English learners and higher education research organizations.
Staff writers Susan Frey and Kathryn Baron contributed to this report. Check back for updates to this story.
*Note: Previous versions incorrectly characterized the approval as a collective waiver for the CORE districts. The Department of Education is granting individual waivers to the eight districts in the CORE network. The distinction is important, because the feds will monitor each district separately for compliance, not through CORE.
SCTA PowerPoint Presentation

CORE Board Meeting: Quarter 4

Signed Core Extension Letter 

Big Education Ape: CORE Districts are "Fronts" for Gates, Waltons, Broad et al http://bit.ly/1O5fbhw


Obama Administration Approves NCLB Waiver Request for California CORE Districts

The Obama administration today approved eight California school districts (Fresno Unified, Long Beach Unified, Los Angeles Unified, Oakland Unified, Sacramento City Unified, San Francisco Unified, Sanger Unified, and Santa Ana Unified) for a one year district waiver from No Child Left Behind (NCLB), in exchange for locally developed plans to prepare all students for college and career, focus aid on the neediest students, and support effective teaching and leadership. These eight districts submitted a joint request for waivers as part of the California Office to Reform Education (CORE).
Earlier this year, California notified the Department that the state did not plan to request Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) flexibility for the 2013-2014 school year and instead will focus on implementing its new college- and career-ready standards. As a result, the Department considered a separate request for waivers from the CORE districts, which together serve over one million students - more students than most states. These districts are leading the way for their state in moving forward with higher standards for all students, particularly English Learners, students with disabilities, and low-achieving students. Since California adopted new standards in 2010, these districts have created shared plans for implementation, systems to improve instruction and promote continuous learning, and joint professional development and supports for teachers. With their new accountability system, the districts will hold themselves and their schools accountable for the performance of thousands more students in underserved subgroups than under NCLB, including approximately 23,000 additional African American students, 15,000 Hispanic students, 20,000 English Learners, 10,000 low-income students, and 46,000 students with disabilities. Teachers and leaders in these districts will also receive more meaningful feedback on their practice through new evaluation systems designed to support improved instruction and increase student learning. As a result of these rigorous plans, the Department is granting the eight districts flexibility from some of NCLB's restrictive mandates to allow them to better focus on key reforms to improve student achievement and increase the quality of instruction.
"The CORE districts have been engaged in collaboration and innovation designed to promote deep student learning and effective implementation of new standards that will prepare students for college and a career," said U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan. "The districts' approved plan includes key accountability components that when implemented will surpass the rigor of the current NCLB system and provide an opportunity to expand innovative interventions and practices that can improve student achievement, rather than spending time and resources implementing NCLB's one-size-fits-all mandates. The significance of their willingness to step up, and for the first time, hold themselves accountable for literally tens of thousands of children who were invisible under NCLB cannot be overstated."
The Department is approving the CORE districts for a one-year waiver from six ESEA requirements and their associated regulatory, administrative and reporting requirements. These waivers are authorized under ESEA section 9401, and are being granted directly to the districts participating in CORE, and not to the CORE organization itself.
The Department will closely monitor the districts' implementation of their plans, and will work with the California Department of Education, the California State Board of Education, and the CORE districts to develop an integrated monitoring strategy.