Latest News and Comment from Education

Saturday, March 21, 2015

Hedge fund execs' money for charter schools may pay off - NY Daily News

Hedge fund execs' money for charter schools may pay off - NY Daily News:



Hedge fund executives give 'til it hurts to politicians, especially Cuomo, to get more charter schools






 Outside the Harvard Club in Midtown, a group of parents from the Alliance for Quality Education picketed as they chanted, “Public schools are not for sale!”

But the hedge fund chiefs inside had other ideas.
The title of the hedge fund bosses’ all-day symposium on Tuesday said it all: “Bonds & Blackboards: Investing in Charter Schools.” Sponsored by the Gates Foundation and the Walton Family Foundation, its aim was to convince investors there’s money to be made in charter schools.
Hedge fund executives have unleashed a tsunami of money the past few years aimed at getting New York’s politicians to close more public schools and expand charter schools.
They’ve done it through direct political contributions, through huge donations to a web of pro-charter lobbying groups, and through massive TV and radio commercials.
Since 2000, 570 hedge fund managers have shelled out nearly $40 million in political contributions in New York State, according to a recent report by Hedge Clippers, a union-backed research group.
The single biggest beneficiary has been Andrew Cuomo, who received $4.8 million from them.
Several of the governor’s big hedge fund donors, such as Carl Icahn, of Icahn Enterprises, Julian Robertson of Tiger Management, and Daniel Loeb, of Third Point LLC, are also longtime backers of charter schools.
Loeb is chairman of the board of the Success Academy network run by former City Councilwoman Eva Moskowitz. He’s given $62,000 to Cuomo, while 18 other members of the Success Academy board or their family members have given nearly $600,000 to the governor, according to state campaign records
But the direct donations don’t tell the full story.
In this era after the Supreme Court’s Citizens United case, the indirect contributions are even more astounding.
Take, for example, a group called New Yorkers for a Balanced Albany. It financed a massive advertising campaign late last year aimed at keeping the state Senate in Republican hands, largely by blasting upstate Democrats as tied to Mayor de Blasio.
That group received $3.5 million from just six hedge fund backers of charter schools.
Loeb contributed $1 million. So did Robertson, whose son Spencer runs a Brooklyn charter school. The others included Paul Tudor Jones, founder and chairman of Excellence Charter School, with $500,000; Icahn, who founded several Bronx charter schools, with $250,000; and Gotham Capital’s Joel Greenblatt, a founder of Success Academy, with $250,000.
The money they gave to New Yorkers for a Balanced Albany thus rivaled the $4.8 million that the teachers union, with its 185,000 members, spent on all political contributions.
But the same people also gave money to other pro-charter groups. Greenblatt, for instance, donated $45,000 to Democrats for Education Reform, a political action committee that, in turn, has given Cuomo $72,000.
Two other pro-charter groups, Families for Excellent Schools and the political arm of Students First New York, spent more than $10 million last year on their lobbying effort.
All that money and lobbying triumphed when Cuomo and the Legislature approved up to $2,600 more per pupil for charter school facilities, with New York City expected to pick up a big portion of that.
Now, the governor wants the Legislature to increase the state limit on charter schools.
Little wonder the big-money hedge fund managers gathered at the Harvard Club. They were there to examine, according to program literature, “the current state of the charter schools facilities financing landscape and new innovative financing mechanisms.”
In other words, all that money thrown at the politicians is about to pay off.
“Their agenda has nothing to do with improving our public schools,” said Zakiya Ansari, spokeswoman for the parents picketing outside.Hedge fund execs' money for charter schools may pay off - NY Daily News:

No Child Left Behind Is a Cheats’ Charter

No Child Left Behind Is a Cheats’ Charter:



No Child Left Behind Is a Cheats’ Charter





 Although re-authorization is still politically complicated, 2015 appears to be the year the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) will bereformed.

Popularly known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB), ESEA promised to close the achievement gap and herald an era of evidence-based education policy by giving federal teeth to a state-based accountability process launched in the early 1980s. However, NCLB not only failed to accomplish these goals, it also led to some schools resorting to cheating, so as to increase test scores.
Starting in 1984, I taught for 18 years in a South Carolina public school. For the past 13 years I have been a professor of teacher education. Throughout these 30-plus years, I have witnessed how accountability based on standards and high-stakes testing has guided how we view and run schools.
My experience and analysis of education policy during that time have revealed important lessons from NCLB–ones likely to be ignored during the re-authorization process. Education reform under the Obama administration and the initial plans for re-authorization show that politicians continue to support standardized testing as part of accountability policies, despite a long record of failure.

U.S. education policy has been misguided by “miracle” claims

Throughout the 1990s and into the 2000s, “miracles” in education reform have significantly influenced U.S. education policy. NCLB, for instance, was built on bipartisan support for George W. Bush’s self-proclaimed Texas miracle.
The “miracle” under Bush suggested that accountability based on standards and high-stakes testing raised student achievement and solved some long-standing educational challenges, such as dropout rates and achievement gaps.
However, scholars have raised questions about the “miracle.” An emeritus professor at Boston College, Walt Haney, who analyzed the Texas reform, concluded:
The gains on TAAS (Texas Assessment of Academic Skills) and the unbelievable decreases in dropouts during the 1990s are more illusory than real. The Texas “miracle” is more hat than cattle.
Despite ample evidence and expert opinion, such “miracle” reforms continue to drive policy even under Obama. Before becoming secretary of education in the Obama administration, Arne Duncan was credited with improving student pass rates in Chicago, another so-called education miracle.
Early in his administration, Barack (and Michelle) Obama endorsed theHarlem “miracle” that claimed enormous gains at Harlem charter schools. Yet,both “miracles” have been called into question.

Testing pressures have led to corrupt practices

In addition, NCLB has created several negative consequences.
For example, the pressure of accountability to meet unattainable goals such as 100% proficiency has resulted in cheating in order to raise test scores. High-profile cases have occurred in Atlanta and Washington, D.C.
Also as detailed by an academic, Andre Perry, testing pressures under NCLB led to corrupt practices in public and charter schools that were exposed in New Orleans. As Perry stated in his analysis, “the desperation to show growth can lead to nefarious practices like counseling out" (identifying students likely to score low on tests and recommending they leave a school) or even excessive expulsion and suspension.
The focus on raising test scores led to other negative consequences as well–such as increasing the emphasis on core courses while also eliminating electives such as art and even more teaching for the test. As a result,expectations for students were also narrowed.
A final consequence was a booming education marketplace. U.K.-based Pearson “has reaped the benefits,” as Stephanie Simon reports: “Half of its $8 billion in annual global sales comes from its North American education division.” A Software & Information Industry Association report reveals that testing and assessment products–which include software, digital content and related digital services–have increased by 57% since 2012-13. They now make up the largest single category of educational technology sales.

NCLB fails to close the achievement gap

Most important of all, NCLB has failed its most ambitious goals, including closing the achievement gap and ushering in evidence-based policy.
Based at UCLA and founded to deepen understanding of racial and ethnic groups in the United States, the Civil Rights Project and FairTest, a program that works to end the misuses and flaws of standardized testing, after a careful analysis of  National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data, reveal that the achievement gap, which appeared to be closing before these No Child Left Behind Is a Cheats’ Charter:

More California parents exercise right to skip standardized tests | Local News - KCRA Home

More California parents exercise right to skip standardized tests | Local News - KCRA Home:

More California parents exercise right to skip standardized tests

State launches its newest student testing program




SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KCRA) —California launched its newest student testing program Tuesday.

 Superintendent of Instruction Tom Torlakson made the announcement at Sutter Middle School in Sacramento, flanked by several local educators.

Students in grades 3-8 and high school juniors will take the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress, or CAASPP, exam.
The new-generation computer-based tests will replace the old fill-the-bubble-with-a-No.-2-pencil tests.
The results will not affect grade promotion, Torlakson said.
"Think of it as an academic check-up, designed to give teachers the feedback they need to improve instruction," Torlakson said.
But opponents of the Common Core curriculum on which the CAASPP is based, have organized a national "opt-out" movement. They encourage parents to take a stand against the use of standardized testing as a barometer for performance by not having children participate.
Critics argue standardized testing puts too much pressure on students and teachers and has become the primary focus in the classroom.
Since 1996, California has had a law that allows parents to decline standardized testing for children for any reason.
The numbers show very few parents have exercised this right. However, the recent negative attention toward Common Core may change that.
According to the California Department of Education, fewer than 7,400 parents declined the STAR test (the previous test) in 2013. That's out of the 4.7 million students who took it. Officials said they did not have opt-out numbers for 2014, when the CAASPP was administered on a trial basis.

Twenty-eight students in the Sacramento City Unified School District refused the exam in 2013, district spokesman Gabe Ross said.
The number jumped to 94 during the first year of field testing on the CAASPP.
Ross attributed the increase to the technology change, saying some students at schools that preferred the paper and pencil method chose not to take part.
In the San Juan Unified School District, 97 students opted out in 2013. That number jumped to 238 last year. Spokeswoman Kim Minugh said administrators determined the increase was due to More California parents exercise right to skip standardized tests | Local News - KCRA Home:

Big Education Ape: The Other Side of Corporate Education Reform in Sacramento: BRIAN HEAP KCRA 3 Anchor/Reporter http://bit.ly/1xy8L2R

Parents Can Opt Out - United Opt Out National

Click Here to go to United Opt Out National: 


Click Here to go to the WebsiteUnited Opt Out Team
Home
Click Here to go to the Website FairTest


OptOutofStandardizedTests

Welcome California!

We hope you find useful information here.
Please add information below by selecting "edit" then save.
Please use the discussion tab to have conversations with others regarding Opting Out.

OPTING OUT

California Law Allows Opting out of Tests
The reference is Title 5 of the CaliforniaCode of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 2, Subchapter 3.75 
"Standardized Testing and Reporting Program", Section 852, (a). 
Its under "more about STAR" on the SED website. 

"A parent or guardian may submit to the school a written request toexcuse his or her child from any or all parts of any test provided 
pursuant to Ed Code Section 60640 [a STAR is born}. The parent or guardian must initiate the request and the school district and its 
employees shall not solicit or encourage any written request on behalf of any child." 
The law is this: 
California Education Code Section 60615. "Notwithstanding any provision of law, a parent's or guardian's written request to school 
officials to excuse his or her child from any or all parts of the assessments administered pursuant to this chapter shall be granted." 

Reports of conversation with Linda Lownes (916-654-5371) in SED who said that districts may inform parents of this right, but they dont have to; that any announcement must be in the same wording to all parents in the district [for equity's sake]; and that the district may not send out a form letter for parents to use. She couldnt give me a reference for this, but instead told me it had been said to administrators at meetings. 
Then Les Axelrod (916-657-5198) in the Department, said he was speaking for the Department's lawyer (Carolyn Pirrillo,916-657-2453) and he said the Regulation is what there is; ie, the things said to administrators arent written down anywhere. 

So it seems to me that teachers are allowed to inform but not solicit or encourage parents to opt out. It also seems to me that means we need to organize advocates and parents to do the soliciting and encouraging."
[Source: Parents and Kids Against Standardized Testing - Discussion - California]

Letters Sent

Bill Kowba, Superintendent of Schools
San Diego Unified School District

Groups and Organizations

Laws

News

Misc

Education Perspectives for Central Valley, Inc., 6% Club
  • Non-Profit Organization advocating for families with a support group for families opting out in California.

PARCC Consortium Protects Pearson Using “Best Practices” Co-authored by Testing “Nonprofit” | deutsch29

PARCC Consortium Protects Pearson Using “Best Practices” Co-authored by Testing “Nonprofit” | deutsch29:



PARCC Consortium Protects Pearson Using “Best Practices” Co-authored by Testing “Nonprofit”





 On March 20, 2015, I published a post about the lately-produced Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) “Test Fairness and Security” statement.

Included in that statement is the following justification for monitoring social media “before, during and after” testing in the name of “test security”:
The PARCC states’ policy follows the best practices outlined by the Council of Chief State School Officers [CCSSO], which recommends that there should be “procedures to monitor the internet and social websites before, during and after test administration for any evidence the items and/or answers have been shared” online.  In order to maintain test security, each PARCC state contracted with its test vendor, Pearson, to search for any live PARCC test questions that are shared through public social media sites. This is standard practice for large-scale tests including ACT and SAT. 
I previously noted that those CCSSO “best practices” are not available to the public to read. One must pay $30 in order to read them.
What I did not note (but will now) is that in its statement of “testing fairness,” the PARCC consortium does not disclose the co-author of those “CCSSO best practices”: The Association of Test Publishers (ATP):
Established in 1992, The Association of Test Publishers is a non-profit organization representing providers of tests and assessment tools and/or services related to assessment, selection, screening, certification, licensing, educational or clinical uses.
ATP members are pledged to promote and advance the integrity of assessment services and products and their value to society; and dedicated to the highest level of professionalism and business ethics within the test publishing community. …
ATP’s membership is composed of the leading publishers and assessment services providers in today’s testing industry.
According to its 2013 990 tax form, ATP is registered as a 501(c)6. Here is a general definition from the IRS:
IRC 501(c)(6) provides for exemption of business leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate boards, boards of trade, and professional football leagues (whether or not administering a pension fund for football players), which are not organized for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. ….
Reg. 1.501(c)(6)-l defines a business league as an association of persons 
PARCC Consortium Protects Pearson Using “Best Practices” Co-authored by Testing “Nonprofit” | deutsch29:

She gets $250,000 a year to spearhead Rauner education privatization plans - Government News - Crain's Chicago Business

She gets $250,000 a year to spearhead Rauner education plans - Government News - Crain's Chicago Business:

She gets $250,000 a year to spearhead Rauner education plans




(AP) — A former Chicago charter schools executive is earning $250,000 a year to spearhead Gov. Bruce Rauner's top education initiatives, a salary that is more than double what her predecessors received and places her as the highest-paid member of a Cabinet already under scrutiny for its lofty paychecks.
For weeks, Beth Purvis' role in the administration had been somewhat of a mystery. There was no formal announcement when she was hired, and during a House education committee meeting earlier this month, she stood and introduced herself when someone on the panel asked if anyone from the governor's office was in attendance.
Not until after several inquiries from The Associated Press did the Rauner administration disclose that Purvis — a key member of the governor's transition team — is now earning $250,000 a year to advise him on education policy. Purvis is being paid as an independent contractor and accepting neither state health nor retirement benefits, according to the governor's office.
CHARTER SCHOOL BONA FIDES
From 2003 until last year, Purvis, who holds a doctorate in special education, served as CEO of the Chicago International Charter School, a network of 15 schools in Chicago and Rockford. She previously worked as a special education teacher in Maryland and Tennessee, as a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago and served on education advisory councils under the last two Illinois governors.
In an interview with the AP, Purvis said her salary is "commensurate with what I've been paid in the past" and cited her three decades of experience.
Rauner Friday called Purvis "a superstar" who is "well worth every penny."
"We need her leadership because we need to comprehensively transform education and vocational training in Illinois," Rauner said. "We have a mindset too much in government that everybody's identical, everyone should be treated the same. People should be compensated based on talent. We could pay everybody the same and have lots of mediocre folks."
DEMS RAISE QUESTIONS
But some Democratic lawmakers questioned whether the pay was appropriate for an employee of the state.
"We want the most talented people to take a turn serving in government," said Sen. Don Harmon of Oak Park. "But most all of us in public service are paid considerably less than if we used our talents in private enterprise. That sort of sacrifice is typically part of the public service deal."
The choice of Purvis also makes a statement about Rauner's priorities early in his tenure — a focus on lifting the state's cap on the number of charter schools allowed in the state. And Rauner last month proposed a budget that included a $300 million increase to K-12 school funding next year while calling for cuts elsewhere, including a roughly $400 million decrease in funding to higher education to offset the bump.
Rauner already has come under fire for paying top members of his administration significantly more than their predecessors but criticizing the average state worker as overpaid. He's spent the first months of his tenure calling for "shared sacrifice" and issuing an executive order halting nonessential spending.
A PRICEY PAYROLL
A review by The Associated Press earlier this year found annual salaries of 10 top employees in his administration far exceed those of comparable aides to former Gov. Pat Quinn by roughly $380,000 — or 36 percent.
Previous governors have hired point people on education, but they've largely also had other duties at the same time, state records show. Kristin Richards, who served as former Gov. Rod Blagojevich's point person on education, was paid $120,000 in 2008 to oversee education and She gets $250,000 a year to spearhead Rauner education plans - Government News - Crain's Chicago Business:

Charter leaders fired, they spent thousands on cars, spas, concerts

Charter leaders fired, they spent thousands on cars, spas, concerts:



Charter leaders fired, they spent thousands on cars, spas, concerts






 Amid accusations its co-leaders used school credit cards for more than $94,000 in personal purchases, the Family Foundations Academy charter school has fired the pair, re-shuffled its board, and handed the reins to the leaders of Eastside Charter School in hopes of convincing the state that it should stay open.

The new leaders say the school's academics and finances are fundamentally sound, and argue that 825 students shouldn't have to see their school closed because of two leaders' bad decisions.
"Our motivation is the good of the kids here," said Charlie McDowell, who is now chair of both schools' boards. "They have a successful school and it's just not right for the school not continue because of this."
Family Foundations was supposed to have its charter renewed at last month's State Board of Education meeting, but Department of Education officials abruptly postponed the vote, saying they had been made aware of an audit alleging serious financial mismanagement.
The audit, commissioned by the school in spring of 2014 and conducted by Philadelphia-based Auphsite Consulting, looked at charges on school-owned credit cards held by Sean Moore, its chief operating officer, and Tennell Brewington, founder and chief academic officer, made from July 2012 through Februrary 2014.
The audit said the pair used American Express corporate cards attached to bank accounts that were created to house money for construction projects and money brought in from sources other than the state.
Those cards were used in addition to state-issued "p-cards," which state workers are supposed to use for work purposes, and they "quickly became the instrument of choice for incurring nonschool related expenditures by Mr. Moore and Dr. Brewington," the audit said.
Charter schools are public schools that receive public funds, so the two should have used p-cards for any school-related purposes.
The audit could not account for $2,403.89 in p-card purchases. The big money, however was in the American Express Cards, which Moore used for a total of $73,956.02 and Brewington used for a total of $20,673.85.
Credit card records in the audit show purchases for car payments, furniture, flowers, fine watches, expensive meals and concert tickets, among many Charter leaders fired, they spent thousands on cars, spas, concerts:

P is for PARCC, Pearson, and Pushback | The Progressive

P is for PARCC, Pearson, and Pushback | The Progressive:



P is for PARCC, Pearson, and Pushback









 Jennifer C. Berkshire

Before the first day of PARCC testing, the results are in. Push back against indefensible state policies and the state will crack.
The special time you’ve been waiting for has at last arrived, boys and girls. It’s PARCC testing week! Think Easter but with a few key differences. Like instead of hunting for eggs, you’re after "college and career readiness." Also, those Peeps in your basket aren’t for realz but are being "piloted" to help determine what should go in your basket next year. Which is to say that it’s never a good idea to put all of the kids’ eggs in one basket, even if the state’s chief educational standards bunny happens to serve as the chair of an egg distributor. 
PARCC: In an eggshell 

First some answers to your questions: like is she really going to force us to endure an extended Easter metaphor that has little if any relevance to PARCC testing? No reader, because we have more important eggs to fry. You see, starting today, 200,000 young Bay Staters are taking a new, outstandingly predictive test that is so "highly aligned" with college and career readiness that the words college and career readiness are in the name of the actual test. Today’s test drive will help the state determine whether the test is the right twenty-first-century test for the state’s twenty-first-century test takers. Which raises our first high-stakes question: what about twenty-first-century test takes who refuse to take the twenty-first-century test?
In which the state clarifies its clarification

As we learned last year, "there is no provision in Massachusetts state law for parents to ‘opt out’ of the annual statewide assessment program." Last week the state clarified its position, again, to the effect that if parents should persist in exercising this non-provision, principals should gently but firmly encourage parents to rethink their refusal, reminding them "that students’ and teachers’ experiences will help the state decide whether PARCC is a worthwhile assessment." And then the kicker: "When a parent directs their child to refuse to take PARCC, they are forgoing their child’s opportunity to contribute to ESE’s evaluation of the test." As for kids who still decline the opportunity to be test drivers?
We ask principals and test proctors to handle refusals with sensitivity. Students should not be pressured to take the test, nor should they be punished for not taking the test.
About that security provision

Shall we pause briefly to assess what we’ve learned so far? For purposes of expediency I will reveal that the correct answer is "P," as in "push back against official positions that are indefensible and those positions are likely to be clarified." Speaking of which, the state’s largest teachers union pushed back hard last week against a requirement that teachers administering the new college and career readiness gauge sign a PARCC security agreement that specifies that:
Failure to abide by the terms of the agreement may result in an investigation that leads to sanctions including employment and licensure consequences, according to your state policies.
But as MTA President Barbara Madeloni noted, the agreement is as vague as it is ominous. BMad: take it away. 
This agreement is on PARCC letterhead but otherwise it is unclear who the parties to the agreement are. The school district as a governmental entity does not appear anywhere in the document. The link to the full document takes you to the Pearson website. Is this an agreement with PARCC? With Pearson? With the district? Who will enforce it and how?
Security, whatevs

Within hours of receiving the MTA’s letter, the Commissioner of College and Career Readiness, Mitchell D
- See more at: http://www.progressive.org/news/2015/03/188048/p-parcc-pearson-and-pushback#sthash.uizHfVSI.YhlKHMPZ.dpuf